Next Article in Journal
In Situ Room Temperature Electron-Beam Driven Graphene Growth from Hydrocarbon Contamination in a Transmission Electron Microscope
Previous Article in Journal
Time-Resolved Spectroscopy of Ethanol Evaporation on Free-Standing Porous Silicon Photonic Microcavities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure and Tensile Properties of AZ61 Alloy Sheets Processed by High-Ratio Extrusion with Subsequent Direct Aging Treatment

1
Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials of Ministry of Education & School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanling Campus, Jilin University, No. 5988 Renmin Street, Changchun 130025, China
2
International Center of Future Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
3
Institute of Casting Research, University of Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(6), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060895
Submission received: 18 April 2018 / Revised: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 23 May 2018 / Published: 26 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Manufacturing Processes and Systems)

Abstract

:
A high extrusion ratio of 166:1 was applied to commercial AZ61 alloy in one step with an extrusion speed of 2.1 m·min−1. The effects of DA (direct aging) treatment on the microstructure and tensile properties of extruded alloy were investigated. The extruded alloy exhibits fine DRXed grains and the average grain size is ~11 μm. After DA treatment at 170 °C, the tensile strength and 0.2% offset yield strength is enhanced from 314 to 336 MPa and from 169 to 191 MPa respectively, sacrificing elongation from 26.5% to 23.3%. The grain size and texture distribution of extruded AZ61 scarcely evolve during the post aging treatment. However, the enhanced strength in peak-aged alloy is mainly caused by the high-density elliptical Mg17Al12 precipitates distributing uniformly along the grain boundaries or within the grains, by precipitation and dispersion hardening. Furthermore, the nano-sized precipitates effectively inhibit grains from coarsening by triggering pinning effects along the grain boundaries at elevated temperature. As a result, the peak-aged alloy exhibits a better superplasticity of 306.5% compared with that of 231.8% of extruded sample. This work provides a practical one-step method for mass-producing Mg alloy sheets with excellent tensile strength and ductility compared with those fabricated by conventional extrusion methods.

1. Introduction

There have been numerous efforts to process fine-grained or nano-structured Mg alloys, with the aim of exhibiting specific mechanical properties, such as high strength and ductility. Among various approaches in grain refinement, severe plastic deformation (SPD) methods have attracted considerable research interest. These SPD methods include high-pressure torsion (HPT) [1], equal channel angular extrusion (ECAE) or equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) [2,3], multiaxial forging (MAF) or multi-directional forging (MDF) [4,5], accumulative roll bonding (ARB) [6,7], as well as cyclic extrusion and compression (CEC) [8], etc. However, the application of SPD methods to mass production remains challenging at present. Hence, it is necessary to provide a simple and efficient processing method suitable for industry application.
Recently, the one-step high-ratio extrusion has received attention due to its flexibility for use on Mg alloys with a great diversity of shapes, such as sheets, rods, tubes, etc. It has been confirmed that an intense deformation using one pass is more effective in obtaining ultrafine grains and high fraction of high angle grain boundaries than an accumulated high strain with multiple passes [9,10]. Studies on high-ratio extrusion have been mainly concentrated on the AZ31 [11,12], ZK60 [13,14], AZ61 [15], AZ80 [15] and AZ91 [16,17] alloys. As reported by Chen et al. [11], the casting AZ31 ingots were first extruded or compressed with a small strain to obtain the conventional extruded billet and subsequently extruded in a one-step method, with the extrusion ratio from 7:1 to 100:1. A gradual grain refinement from ~25 to ~4 μm was achieved with the extrusion ratio increasing, when the extrusion temperature was 250 °C. Murai et al. [12] investigated the influence of extrusion ratio on the tensile properties of the extruded AZ31B alloy, where the extrusion ratio was set at 10:1, 50:1 and 100:1, respectively. Their results indicated that the influence of extrusion ratio on elongation was more significant than on tensile strength, and elongation tended to improve with an increase in extrusion ratio. Uematsu et al. [15] employed a high extrusion ratio of 133:1 on the AZ61 and AZ80 alloys with the working temperature controlled from 340 to 377 °C. Hereinto, significant grain refinement was achieved, with the average grain size of ~3.9 and ~4.3 μm for the AZ61 and AZ80 alloys, respectively. In addition, Watanabe et al. [17] confirmed that fine grained AZ91 alloy with the average grain size of ~1.7 μm could be achieved by hot extrusion alone at 250 °C in one step with an extrusion ratio of 44:1. A large elongation of over 300% at the high strain rate of 1 × 10−2 s−1 was obtained at around 275 °C in their work.
Nevertheless, studies on the influence of aging treatment have scarcely been concentrated on the AZ61 alloy processed by high-ratio extrusion. Moreover, most of the reported work on high-ratio extrusion mainly focuses on the superplasticity of extruded alloys. Therefore, the extrusion temperature is usually relatively low, varying from 250 °C to 350 °C to create significant grain refinement. This distinctly results in a very slow extrusion speed, e.g., the extrusion speed at 250 °C is only 20 mm·min−1 when the extrusion ratio is 100:1 [11]. Moreover, there is also an adverse effect that the product size is limited by the requirement of both high extrusion ratio and low extrusion temperature. This severely inhibits the application of one-step high-ratio extrusion for industrial production. Accordingly, it is necessary to provide a more practical method that can not only meet mass production, but also has excellent mechanical properties. Furthermore, it has been reported by Uematsu et al. [18] that precipitation takes place more significantly in direct aging than in solution and aging condition and further achieves a higher hardness and tensile strength.
Therefore, the present work primarily focuses on the microstructure and tensile properties of high-ratio extruded AZ61 alloy that followed by direct aging (DA) treatment, where a high-ratio extrusion of 166:1 was carried out in one step at a high extrusion temperature as well as fast extrusion speed.

2. Experimental Procedure

The as-cast Mg-6.6Al-0.8Zn-0.3Mn (AZ61) alloy billets with a diameter of 95 mm were used in this study. After homogenization at 300 °C for 2 h and 400 °C for 5 h, the billets were extruded in a one-step process at an extrusion ratio of 166:1 to obtain a final sheet with the size of 0.95 mm in thickness and 45 mm in width, respectively. For better understanding the process, a sketch of the one-step extrusion process is illustrated in Figure 1. The homogenized alloy was extruded at 390 °C and the extrusion flow rate was set at 2.1 m·min−1. The actual temperature of the deformation zone in the extrusion process was measured using a thermocouple, which was installed inside the die. It turned out that the temperature increased to ~420 °C because of plastic deformation and friction in the extrusion process.
After processing, the extruded sheet was directly aged at 170 °C in the air furnace, as followed by naturally air cooling. The aging response was characterized in the mechanically polished samples using Vickers microhardness testing (1600-5122 VD MICROMET 5104, New York, NY, USA) at a load of 50 g for 15 s. Tensile specimens of the extruded and peak-aged samples were tested along the extrusion direction (ED) on INSTRON 5869 with a strain rate of 1.0 × 10−3 s−1 at room temperature and 300 °C, respectively. The gauge size of both cases is the same with 30 × 10 × 0.95 mm3. The microstructure was observed by an optical microscope (OM, Carl Zeiss Axio Imager A2m, Göttingen, Germany) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM, VEGA3 XMU, TESCAN, Brno, Czech). The phase constituents were analyzed on the X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/Max 2500PC, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation. The scanning electron microscope (SEM, VEGA3 XMU, TESCAN, Czech) equipped with an Oxford Instruments NordlysNano EBSD detector using Channel 5.0 data acquisition software was used to observe the grain structure and microtexture evolution. The accelerating voltage and step size was 20 kV and 0.5 μm, respectively. Nano Measurer 1.2 was used to obtain the average grain size and distribution of the Mg matrix and precipitates [19], which was derived from at least eight micrographs.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a shows the optical micrograph of the extruded sample. Fine and equiaxed grains distribute uniformly within the whole area, which indicates that dynamic recrystallization (DRX) takes place completely during the extrusion process. It is noteworthy that the grain size of extruded AZ61 alloy has a narrow range mainly from 5 to 15 μm, revealing an average grain size of ~11.1 μm (Figure 2b). Chung et al. [20] reported that the mean grain size of the 3-pass and 4-pass ECAPed AZ61 alloy was ~11.2 and ~10.6 μm, respectively. Consequently, the grain size of this work is comparable to their values and much finer than those fabricated by conventional extrusion process (20–35 μm) [21,22,23]. Furthermore, it is widely accepted that high strength and high ductility at room temperature is generally achieved by grain refinement [24]. Accordingly, the relatively finer grains in this work are conducive to a better combination of tensile strength and ductility. Generally, the relationship between true strain and extrusion ratio can be expressed as follows:
ε = ln Re
where ε is the true strain and Re is the extrusion ratio [11]. Hence, the present work obtains a true strain of about 5.1. Lin et al. [16] described a similar work that the AZ91 alloy was extruded with a reduction ratio of 166:1 at 250–350 °C. In their work, a rod billet with a diameter of 65 mm was extruded into a plate with width of 10 mm and thickness of 2 mm. Note that their extrusion size is much thicker and smaller that of 0.95 mm × 45 mm in this work. This confirms the practicability of fabricating Mg alloys sheets in thickness of less than 1 mm by a one-step extrusion process.
Figure 2c exhibits the typical SEM feature of the extruded AZ61 alloy. It is evident that few precipitates can be seen in the Mg matrix, which implies that most of Mg17Al12 phases have dissolved into the α-Mg matrix. Figure 2d,e illustrates the EBSD inverse pole figure (IPF) map and corresponding (0002) pole figure obtained from extrusion direction (ED)-transverse direction (TD) plane of extruded AZ61 alloy. High-angle grain boundaries with misorientations between 15° and 90° are colored in black, while low-angle grain boundaries are marked in gray with misorientations in the range from 2° to 15°. It demonstrates that the extruded specimen has a texture at the centre of the (0002) pole figure with little spread, in which the peak intensity is 25.6, indicating a basal texture. This is different from the conventional extruded texture where the basal planes parallel to the ED with a spread toward the TD. Similarly, a strong basal texture with a roughly circle-shaped distribution of {0001} orientation has also been reported in the hot-extruded AZ61 alloy [25].
To further improve the mechanical properties of the extruded AZ61 alloy, direct aging (DA) treatment was carried out at 170 °C in the present work. The change in Vickers hardness with the aging time is shown in Figure 3a. It shows that an obvious age-hardening is obtained where the micro-hardness increases from 63.1 (aged for 0 h) to the peak value of 82.3 at 54 h (DA-54h). Figure 3b shows the XRD analysis of the extruded and DA-54h samples. The typical peaks of Mg17Al12 phases in the DA-54h sample (red line) are more obvious in comparison with the extruded sample (black line). Hence, the increased micro-hardness is mainly attributed to the effective precipitation of Mg17Al12 particles by DA treatment. In addition, there are no peaks containing Zn in both cases, originating from the high solubility of Zn in Mg and relatively low content in this work, so most of Zn has dissolved into the matrix.
Figure 4a shows the SEM micrograph of the DA-54h specimen. Plenty of second phases have precipitated after DA treatment. Two types of precipitation morphology can be observed coexistent in the matrix, i.e., discontinuous precipitation along the boundaries and continuous precipitation within the grains. To further observe the two different types of precipitates clearly, high magnified SEM images are given in Figure 4b,c. It can be seen that most of the discontinuous precipitates along the boundaries have an elliptical morphology with the size ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 μm and the average value is ~0.5 μm (Figure 4b). This result is different from the coarse lamellar morphology of discontinuous β-Mg17Al12 phases that the precipitates generally grow from the grain boundaries into the grain interiors. The elliptical morphology in this work implies that the growth process of discontinuous precipitation is effectively inhibited. It is recognized that vacancies, dislocations and twins induced by deformation can act as the precipitation nuclei during the post heat treatment [26]. Although most of the deformation twins have been consumed by the DRX (Figure 2a,c) process, it is believed that there still exists a high density of vacancies and dislocations in the extruded condition, as the extrusion ratio is as high as 166:1. Furthermore, the distribution of solute atoms in the matrix is generally more uniform with the introduction of high-ratio extrusion compared with conventional extrusion. Hence, large amounts of continuous Mg17Al12 precipitates can be observed to occupy the remaining areas within the grains when direct aging treatment is performed on the extruded sample. The results demonstrate two distinct morphologies of continuous precipitates in the present work. One is the elliptical morphology with the diameter less than 1 μm (Figure 4b), which is similar to the discontinuous precipitation. The other exhibits a Widmanstätten structure (Figure 4c), which is the dominant morphology for continuous precipitates in the aging temperatures between 150 and 250 °C [27]. In addition, the uniform precipitation with small size is also attributed to the relatively low temperature of aging treatment, which is 170 °C in this work.
Figure 4d,e exhibits the EBSD analysis results of the DA-54h sample. Note that there is no significant evolution in the peak intensity, implying that the texture of extruded alloy scarcely evolved during the post heat treatment of DA. Additionally, the grain size distribution of the DA-54h sample is given in Figure 4f. It demonstrates that the grain size mainly distributes in a range from 5 to 15 μm with an average value of ~11.5 μm. Therefore, it is concluded that apart from the precipitation of Mg17Al12 phases, the DA-54h sample has a similar texture and grain size distribution to the extruded AZ61 alloy.
In order to study the effect of DA treatment on the mechanical properties, tensile tests of the extruded and DA-54h samples were carried out at room temperature and 300 °C, respectively. The results of typical tensile engineering stress-strain curves are shown in Figure 5a,b with corresponding tensile properties listed in Table 1. It is evident that the extruded sample shows a good combination of strength and ductility, with the tensile strength σb of 314 MPa and the elongation to failure εf of 26.5%. After subsequent heat treatment of DA at 170 °C for 54h, the tensile strength of DA-54h further enhances to 336 MPa. Jiang et al. [28] demonstrated a similar improvement of tensile strength by aging treatment for AZ61 alloy, which was increased from 310 to 327 MPa. However, the sacrifice of their elongation is obvious from 26% to 19%. It is noteworthy that the elongation of DA-54h is 23.3%, indicating a decrease of 3.2% compared with the extruded sample. Hence, the sacrifice of ductility in this work is smaller than that of 7% in their work. Compared with the coarse lamellar discontinuous precipitation in their work, the precipitates in this work are much finer in size (~0.5 μm) and more uniform in distribution. Since smaller and more numerous precipitate particles are better able to resist dislocation slip, they are more conducive to the mechanical properties [27]. Also, the 0.2% offset yield strength σ0.2 improved from 169 to 191 MPa after DA treatment, mainly due to the precipitation hardening of Mg17Al12 phases, as there is no distinct difference in the texture and grain size distribution between both cases. In addition, the dispersive second phases of high volume fraction also contribute to the dispersion hardening by the Orowan bypass mechanism. For the tensile tests at 300 °C, the tensile strength of extruded sample is 47 MPa and the elongation to failure is 231.8% (Figure 5b and Table 1). An obvious improvement of elongation is achieved in DA-54h sample, which is 306.5% with a comparable tensile strength of 48 MPa.
Additionally, the tensile properties of AZ61 alloy processed by various methods such as conventional extrusion [18,20,23,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], ECAP [2,3,20,36,37], multi-pass rolling [25,38,39,40,41] and forging [4,5,28] in the literature, are given in Figure 5c for comparison with this work. Note that the excellent balance of tensile strength and ductility in this work shows significant advantage compared with the conventional extrusion and is even comparable to the ECAP deformation. Accordingly, the one-step process with high extrusion ratio followed by direct aging treatment is proven to be a simple, economical and highly effective method for producing Mg alloy sheets with excellent mechanical properties.
Figure 6a,b shows the fracture micrographs of the extruded and DA-54h samples in the gauge section after tensile deformation at room temperature. As the initiation of microcracks is strongly connected to the presence and morphology of second phases, the reduction in ductility in the DA-54h sample should be mainly attributed to the existence of coarse micron-sized Mg17Al12 phases (Figure 6b), which may result in dislocation pile-ups and hence increase stress concentration in the neighborhood, acting as potential sources of breakage during tensile deformation. Figure 6c,d demonstrates the fracture micrographs of the extruded and DA-54h samples after tensile deformation at 300 °C, and the corresponding grain size distribution are shown in Figure 6e,f, respectively. Note that fine equiaxed grains with the grain size varying from 3 to 10 μm can be seen in the extruded (Figure 6c,e) and DA-54h (Figure 6d,f) samples, indicating the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization in both cases. However, it should be noted that there is a more uniform and finer microstructure with an average size of ~6 μm in the DA-54h alloy, which is believed to be conducive to obtaining a better superplasticity. Moreover, it is evident that most of the Mg17Al12 phases of DA-54h have dissolved back into the matrix and re-precipitated on the grain boundaries after tensile deformation at 300 °C (Figure 6d). It is well known that the mobility of grain boundaries and dislocations can be restricted due to the pinning force originated from particles [42]. The uniform nano-sized Mg17Al12 particles of DA-54h play a significant pinning effect on the grain boundaries, effectively inhibiting grains from coarsening in the process of tensile deformation at 300 °C and resulting in a better superplasticity of 306.5% compared with the extruded AZ61 alloy (231.8%, Figure 5b and Table 1).
Overall, the one-step extrusion process with a high extrusion ratio can significantly improve both the strength and ductility of AZ61 alloy in this work. Both the tensile strength and yield strength are further enhanced after DA heat treatment, with minimally sacrificing elongation. Moreover, the precipitation of nano-sized Mg17Al12 phases with uniform distribution allows better superplasticity, by effectively inhibiting the grain growth. Therefore, there is enormous potential for the one-step high-ratio extrusion with subsequent heat treatment of DA for the industrial production of Mg alloy sheets with excellent balance of tensile strength and ductility.

4. Conclusions

A high-ratio extrusion of 166:1 was successfully performed on the AZ61 alloy in one step without cracks for obtaining an alloy sheet less than 1 mm with a mass-producing speed of 2.1 m·min−1. The extruded alloy exhibits fine DRXed grains and the average grain size is ~11 μm, resulting in an advantageous balance of strength and ductility. The tensile strength and 0.2% offset yield strength is further enhanced from 314 to 336 MPa and from 169 to 191 MPa respectively after DA treatment, with a little sacrifice of elongation from 26.5% to 23.3%. Moreover, the peak-aged alloy shows a better superplasticity of 306.5% compared with that of 231.8% of extruded sample in the tensile deformation at 300 °C. Since the grain size and texture distribution of extruded AZ61 scarcely evolved during the post-aging treatment, the enhanced strength in peak-aged alloy is mainly due to the high-density elliptical Mg17Al12 precipitates. The nano-sized precipitates distributing uniformly along the grain boundaries or in the grain interiors played a significant role in the precipitation hardening and dispersion hardening, and further inhibit grains from coarsening by triggering pinning effects along the grain boundaries at elevated temperatures.

Author Contributions

C.-C.Z., H.-Y.W., M.Z., C.W., J.-H.L., Z.-Z.Y. and Q.-C.J. conceived and designed the experiments; C.-C.Z. performed the experiments; C.-C.Z., H.-Y.W. and C.W. analyzed the data; C.-C.Z. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [The National key research and development program] grant numbers [2016YFE0115300 and 2017YFA0403700], [The Natural Science Foundation of China] grant numbers [51625402, 51671093, 5170483 and 5170485], [The Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province] grant numbers [20160519002JH and 20170520124JH] and [“13th Five-Year” science and technology project of Jilin Province] grant number [JJKH20180129KJ].

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the donation of Henan Mingmei Magnesium Technology Co., Ltd for materials used in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhilyaev, A.P.; Nurislamova, G.V.; Kim, B.-K.; Baró, M.D.; Szpunar, J.A.; Langdon, T.G. Experimental parameters influencing grain refinement and microstructural evolution during high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yoshida, Y.; Arai, K.; Itoh, S.; Kamado, S.; Kojima, Y. Realization of high strength and high ductility for AZ61 magnesium alloy by severe warm working. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2005, 6, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, W.J.; Hong, S.I.; Kim, Y.S.; Min, S.H.; Jeong, H.T.; Lee, J.D. Texture development and its effect on mechanical properties of an AZ61 Mg alloy fabricated by equal channel angular pressing. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 3293–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jiang, M.G.; Yan, H.; Chen, R.S. Microstructure, texture and mechanical properties in an as-cast AZ61 Mg alloy during multi-directional impact forging and subsequent heat treatment. Mater. Des. 2015, 87, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Q.; Shu, D.; Hu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Yuan, B. Grain refinement in an as-cast AZ61 magnesium alloy processed by multi-axial forging under the multitemperature processing procedure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 541, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saito, Y.; Utsunomiya, H.; Tsuji, N.; Sakai, T. Novel ultra-high straining process for bulk materials-development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Acta Mater. 1999, 47, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsuji, N.; Saito, Y.; Utsunomiya, H.; Tanigawa, S. Ultra-fine grained bulk steel produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr. Mater. 1999, 40, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, J.B.; Wang, Q.D.; Peng, L.M.; Roven, H.J. Microstructure and high tensile ductility of ZK60 magnesium alloy processed by cyclic extrusion and compression. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 476, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Valiev, R.Z.; Langdon, T.G. Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2006, 51, 881–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakashima, K.; Horita, Z.; Nemoto, M.; Langdon, T.G. Influence of channel angle on the development of ultrafine grains in equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater. 1998, 46, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Y.J.; Wang, Q.D.; Peng, J.G.; Zhai, C.Q.; Ding, W.J. Effects of extrusion ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31 Mg alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 182, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Murai, T.; Matsuoka, S.; Miyamoto, S.; Oki, Y. Effects of extrusion conditions on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31B magnesium alloy extrusions. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 141, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mabuchi, M.; Asahina, T.; Iwasaki, H.; Higashi, K. Experimental investigation of superplastic behaviour in magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1997, 13, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mukai, T.; Watanabe, H.; Higashi, K. Grain refinement of commercial magnesium alloys for high-strain-rate-superplastic forming. Mater. Sci. Forum 2000, 350–351, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Uematsu, Y.; Tokaji, K.; Kamakura, M.; Uchida, K.; Shibata, H.; Bekku, N. Effect of extrusion conditions on grain refinement and fatigue behaviour in magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 434, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, H.K.; Huang, J.C. Fabrication of low temperature superplastic AZ91 Mg alloys using simple high-ratio extrusion method. Key Eng. Mater. 2003, 233–236, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Watanabe, H.; Mukai, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Higashi, K. High-strain-rate superplasticity in an AZ91 magnesium alloy processed by ingot metallurgy route. Mater. Trans. 2002, 43, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uematsu, Y.; Tokaji, K.; Matsumoto, M. Effect of aging treatment on fatigue behaviour in extruded AZ61 and AZ80 magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 517, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, H.Y.; Feng, T.T.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.G.; Pan, Y.; Zha, M.; Nan, X.L.; Wang, C.; Jiang, Q.C. Achieving a weak basal texture in a Mg–6Al–3Sn alloy by wave-shaped die rolling. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chung, C.S.; Chun, D.K.; Kim, H.K. Fatigue properties of fine grained magnesium alloys after severe plastic deformation. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2005, 19, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. El-Morsy, A.; Ismail, A.; Waly, M. Microstructural and mechanical properties evolution of magnesium AZ61 alloy processed through a combination of extrusion and thermomechanical processes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 486, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harai, Y.; Kai, M.; Kaneko, K.; Horita, Z.; Langdon, T.G. Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of AZ61 magnesium alloy processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater. Trans. 2008, 49, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kleiner, S.; Uggowitzer, P.J. Mechanical anisotropy of extruded Mg-6% Al-1% Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 379, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdelaziz, M.H.; Paradis, M.; Samuel, A.M.; Doty, H.W.; Samuel, F.H. Effect of aluminum addition on the microstructure, tensile properties, and fractography of cast Mg-based alloys. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 2017, 7408641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, X.S.; Suzuki, K.; Saito, N. Textures and stretch formability of Mg-6Al-1Zn magnesium alloy sheets rolled at high temperatures up to 793 K. Scr. Mater. 2009, 60, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nie, J.F. Precipitation and hardening in magnesium alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2012, 43, 3891–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lai, W.J.; Li, Y.Y.; Hsu, Y.F.; Trong, S.; Wang, W.H. Aging behaviour and precipitate morphologies in Mg-7.7Al-0.5Zn-0.3Mn (wt.%) alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 476, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, M.G.; Yan, H.; Chen, R.S. Enhanced mechanical properties due to grain refinement and texture modification in an AZ61 Mg alloy processed by small strain impact forging. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 621, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, S.-H.; You, B.S.; Park, S.H. Effect of billet diameter on hot extrusion behavior of Mg-Al-Zn alloys and its influence on microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 690, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhuiyana, M.S.; Mutoh, Y.; McEvily, A.J. The influence of mechanical surface treatments on fatigue behavior of extruded AZ61 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 549, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rashad, M.; Pan, F.; Lin, D.; Asif, M. High temperature mechanical behavior of AZ61 magnesium alloy reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, Q.; Zhang, J.X.; Jiang, Y.Y.; Li, Q.Z. Effect of strain ratio on cyclic deformation and fatigue of extruded AZ61A magnesium alloy. Int. J. Fatigue 2012, 44, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, H.T.; Zeng, X.Q.; Liu, L.F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.P.; Ding, W.J. Effect of cerium on microstructures and mechanical properties of AZ61 wrought magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 7061–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, Y.L.; Li, X.C.; Xu, W.T.; Wu, D.; Yang, M. Effects of process parameters on microstructural evolution and properties of AZ61 alloy during hot extrusion. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. IOP Publ. 2015, 103, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sajuri, Z.B.; Miyashita, Y.; Hosokai, Y.; Mutoh, Y. Effects of Mn content and texture on fatigue properties of as-cast and extruded AZ61 magnesium alloys. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2006, 48, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Avvari, M.; Narendranath, S. Influence of Route-R on wrought magnesium AZ61 alloy mechanical properties through equal channel angular pressing. J. Magnes. Alloys 2014, 2, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, J.F.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.J. Microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ61 alloys with large cross-sectional size fabricated by multi-pass ECAP. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 560, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, W.J.; Park, I.B.; Han, S.H. Formation of a nanocomposite-like microstructure in Mg-6Al-1Zn alloy. Scr. Mater. 2012, 66, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zha, M.; Zhang, H.M.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, E.B.; Jiang, Q.C. Prominent role of a high volume fraction of Mg17Al12 particles on tensile behaviors of rolled Mg-Al-Zn alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.S.; Suzuki, K.; Chino, Y.; Mabuchi, M. Texture and stretch formability of AZ61 and AM60 magnesium alloy sheets processed by high-temperature rolling. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 632, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olguín-González, M.L.; Hernández-Silva, D.; García-Bernal, M.A.; Sauce-Rangel, V.M. Hot deformation behavior of hot-rolled AZ31 and AZ61 magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 597, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Watanabe, H.; Mukai, T.; Higashi, K. Influence of temperature and grain size on threshold stress for superplastic flow in a fine-grained magnesium alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2008, 39, 2351–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sketch of the one-step extrusion process for AZ61 alloy.
Figure 1. Sketch of the one-step extrusion process for AZ61 alloy.
Materials 11 00895 g001
Figure 2. (a) Optical image, (b) grain size distribution, (c) SEM micrograph, (d) EBSD IPF map and (e) corresponding (0002) pole figure of the extruded AZ61 alloy.
Figure 2. (a) Optical image, (b) grain size distribution, (c) SEM micrograph, (d) EBSD IPF map and (e) corresponding (0002) pole figure of the extruded AZ61 alloy.
Materials 11 00895 g002
Figure 3. (a) Vickers hardness with aging time at 170 °C and (b) XRD patterns of the extruded and DA-54h AZ61 alloy.
Figure 3. (a) Vickers hardness with aging time at 170 °C and (b) XRD patterns of the extruded and DA-54h AZ61 alloy.
Materials 11 00895 g003
Figure 4. (a) Low magnification, (b,c) high magnification SEM micrographs (CP: continuous precipitation, DP: discontinuous precipitation), (d) EBSD IPF map, (e) (0002) pole figure and (f) grain size distribution of DA-54h.
Figure 4. (a) Low magnification, (b,c) high magnification SEM micrographs (CP: continuous precipitation, DP: discontinuous precipitation), (d) EBSD IPF map, (e) (0002) pole figure and (f) grain size distribution of DA-54h.
Materials 11 00895 g004
Figure 5. (a) Tensile engineering stress-strain curves of the extruded and DA-54h alloy at room temperature and (b) at 300 °C (insets: comparison of specimens before and after deformation), (c) ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as a function of elongation to failure of AZ61 alloy processed by various methods in the literature for comparison with this work.
Figure 5. (a) Tensile engineering stress-strain curves of the extruded and DA-54h alloy at room temperature and (b) at 300 °C (insets: comparison of specimens before and after deformation), (c) ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as a function of elongation to failure of AZ61 alloy processed by various methods in the literature for comparison with this work.
Materials 11 00895 g005
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of the fractured samples in the gauge section after tensile deformation of (a) extruded, (b) DA-54h at room temperature and (c) extruded, (d) DA-54h at 300 °C with corresponding grain size distribution in (e,f), respectively.
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of the fractured samples in the gauge section after tensile deformation of (a) extruded, (b) DA-54h at room temperature and (c) extruded, (d) DA-54h at 300 °C with corresponding grain size distribution in (e,f), respectively.
Materials 11 00895 g006
Table 1. Tensile properties of the extruded and DA-54h AZ61 alloy at room temperature and 300 °C.
Table 1. Tensile properties of the extruded and DA-54h AZ61 alloy at room temperature and 300 °C.
SamplesRoom Temperature300 °C
Tensile Strength, σb/MPaYield Strength, σ0.2/MPaElongation to Failure, εf/%Tensile Strength, σb/MPaElongation to Failure, εf/%
Extruded314 ± 2169 ± 626.5 ± 0.747 ± 1231.8 ± 1.8
DA-54h336 ± 1191 ± 323.3 ± 1.348 ± 1306.5 ± 11.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Zha, M.; Wang, C.; Li, J.-H.; Yang, Z.-Z.; Jiang, Q.-C. Microstructure and Tensile Properties of AZ61 Alloy Sheets Processed by High-Ratio Extrusion with Subsequent Direct Aging Treatment. Materials 2018, 11, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060895

AMA Style

Zhang C-C, Wang H-Y, Zha M, Wang C, Li J-H, Yang Z-Z, Jiang Q-C. Microstructure and Tensile Properties of AZ61 Alloy Sheets Processed by High-Ratio Extrusion with Subsequent Direct Aging Treatment. Materials. 2018; 11(6):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Cheng-Cheng, Hui-Yuan Wang, Min Zha, Cheng Wang, Jie-Hua Li, Zhi-Zheng Yang, and Qi-Chuan Jiang. 2018. "Microstructure and Tensile Properties of AZ61 Alloy Sheets Processed by High-Ratio Extrusion with Subsequent Direct Aging Treatment" Materials 11, no. 6: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060895

APA Style

Zhang, C. -C., Wang, H. -Y., Zha, M., Wang, C., Li, J. -H., Yang, Z. -Z., & Jiang, Q. -C. (2018). Microstructure and Tensile Properties of AZ61 Alloy Sheets Processed by High-Ratio Extrusion with Subsequent Direct Aging Treatment. Materials, 11(6), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop