Next Article in Journal
Emerging Nanomedicine Therapies to Counter the Rise of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Sensitive Hydrogen (H2) Sensing Device Based on Ag Doped SnO2 Nanospheres
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructural Evolution of AlCoCrFeNiSi High-Entropy Alloy Powder during Mechanical Alloying and Its Coating Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of the Interlayer Distance on the Performance of Thermally Reduced Graphene Oxide Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/ma11020322
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

3D Graphene-Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanotubes Network Modified Electrode as Sensing Materials for the Determination of Urapidil

by
Yanju Wu
1,
Anxing Zhou
1,
Huimin Yang
1,
Fei Wang
1,* and
Kui Lu
2,*
1
School of Material and Chemistry Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou 450007, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering and Food Science, Zhengzhou Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou 450044, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(2), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020322
Submission received: 30 January 2018 / Revised: 11 February 2018 / Accepted: 12 February 2018 / Published: 23 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Functional Nanomaterials and Their Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, a three dimensional (3D) graphene-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (G-NCNTs) network was successfully fabricated on the surface of a glassy carbon (GC) electrode using the pulse potential method (PPM) in a graphene oxide-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (GO-NCNTs) dispersion. The morphological and characteristics of GO-NCNTs and G-NCNTs nanocomposites were investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UV-vis spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and electrochemical experiments. The 3DG-NCNTs network was applied as a new voltammetric material for the fabrication of an electrochemical platform for determination of urapidil. Systematic electrochemical tests demonstrate that the 3DG-NCNTs network modified GC electrode can effectively increase the response to the oxidation of urapidil. Under the optimum conditions, the electrochemical response was linear with urapidil concentrations in the range of 1.0 × 10−8~2.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1, while a low detection limit of 5.0 × 10−9 mol·L−1 was obtained for urapidil. Moreover, the proposed sensing platform exhibited good results for sensitivity, reproducibility, selectivity, and stability, which makes it very suitable for use as an ideal inexpensive and rapid analytical method applicable for complex drug matrices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Urapidil is a phenyl piperazine substituted uracil derivative and its structure is shown in Scheme 1. Because of its characteristic to induce blood vessel dilation with few serious side effects, it is very suitable to treat severe hypertension and hypertensive crisis for the elderly [1,2]. Now it has been applied as a preferential anti-hypertensive drug in many countries. Therefore, the determination of urapidil is necessary for drug safety. UV-vis and flow-injection chemiluminescence [3,4] was first employed, but it suffered from low detection limit and narrow linear range. Recently, several analytical methods, such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [5], liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [6,7], capillary electrophoresis (CE) [8], and atomic absorption spectrometery (AAS) [9], have been also proposed for determination of urapidil. Although these methods have some advantages of accuracy and sensitivity, they require tedious pretreatment procedures, or complicated pre-separation processes, at high cost. In contrast, electrochemical methods with respect to their advantages such as simplicity, sensitivity, accuracy, and ease of on-site applications, have received considerable attention. As to the determination of urapidil, different electrochemical methods have been reported [10,11]. Despite the progress made, it is very interesting and important to develop a rapid, simple, sensitive, and reliable analytical method for urapidil.
Graphene (as a two-dimensional (2D) carbon material) has been an attractive candidate for numerous applications including electronic devices [12], energy conversion and storage devices [13], sensors and biosensors [14] due to its excellent electrochemical stability, large specific surface area, and high electrical conductivity [15,16]. However, the aggregation or restacking of graphene sheets that inevitably occurs due to the strong π-π interactions results in the loss of effective surface area [17]. To overcome this issue, it is very important to design and fabricate three-dimensional (3D) graphene sheets with porous structures. These 3D graphene (3DG) networks have an extraordinary surface area, allow target analyte to access the individual graphene sheets more easily, and create continuous ion transport pathways due to their unique porous structure, which in turn decreases the mass transport resistance of the electrode. Recently, various methods have been proposed for fabricating 3D graphene including the template method [18], chemical reduction method [19], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method [20], and the electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO) sheets method [21]. Among these methods, electrochemical reduction is a green, facile, and low cost approach for preparing electroactive materials. Moreover, it is the most convenient and effective way for electrode surface modification since it can directly deposit reduced graphene sheets on the surface of electrodes. On the other hand, various electrochemical platforms based on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have also been widely used in past years [22,23,24]. Besides, recent research confirmed that nitrogen-doped CNTs (NCNTs) exhibit better conductivity, as well as higher rate capability and wettability than that of ordinary CNTs [25,26,27].
In this work, we present a simple yet effective way to fabricate the 3D graphene-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (3DG-NCNTs) network modified glassy carbon (GC) electrode using the pulse potential method (PPM). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and electrochemical experiments confirmed that G-NCNTs nanocomposite interpenetrated the network of 3D structure and gave excellent electrochemical performance. The 3DG-NCNTs network was applied as a new voltammetric material for the fabrication of an electrochemical platform for determination of urapidil. Systematic electrochemical tests demonstrated that the 3DG-NCNTs network modified GC electrode can effectively increase response to the oxidation of urapidil. Under the optimum conditions, the electrochemical response was linear with urapidil concentrations in the range of 1.0 × 10−8~2.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1. The proposed sensing platform exhibited good sensitivity, reproducibility, selectivity, and stability, which makes it very suitable for use as an ideal inexpensive and rapid analytical method applicable for complex drug matrices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

High-purity flake graphite (325 meshes) and nitrogen-doped multi walled carbon nanotubes (N content: 3.00 wt %; OD: 10–20 nm; L: 0.5–2 μm; purity >95%) were purchased from Nanjing Xfnano Materials Tech. Co. Ltd. (Nanjing, China). All other reagents including urapidil, H2O2, K4[Fe(CN)6], H2SO4, and hydrazine hydrate were bought from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All reagents were of guaranteed grade and used as received. Double distilled water (DDW) was used for all preparations. Urapidil sustained-release tablets (Xi’an Lijun Pharmaceutical Co., Xi’an, China) were purchased from a local drugstore (Zhengzhou, China).

2.2. Preparation of GO-NCNTs Dispersion

Graphene (GO) sheets were prepared from high-purity flake graphite by a modified Hummers method [28]. After preparation, GO was centrifuged at 4000 rpm to remove the unreacted flake graphite. Then, the exfoliated GO was obtained by ultrasonication for 3 h. Finally, 3 mg NCNTs were added to 10 mL 3 mg·mL−1 GO suspension, and then sonicated for 30 min to obtain GO-NCNTs homogeneous dispersion.

2.3. Preparation of 3DG-NCNTs Network Modified GC Electrode

Prior to surface functionalization, a glassy carbon (GC) electrode was polished (with aqueous slurries of 0.05 μm α-alumina on a polishing cloth) and sonicated in DDW for 5 min, after being dried under N2 blowing. The cleaned GC electrode was immersed in GO-NCNTs dispersion, and electrodeposition was carried out by PPM under stirring. The parameters of electrodeposition were optimized according to our previous report [29,30] and listed as follows: anodic pulse duration ta, 0.7 s; cathodic pulse duration tc, 0.3 s; experimental time texp, 150 s. At the same time, a 3DG modified GC electrode was also fabricated by a similar procedure in GO dispersion.

2.4. Instruments and Characterizations

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis was performed by a Dimension FastScan AFM (Bruker Company, Karlsruner, Germany). Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of the prepared 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs networks were obtained using a field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) of MERLIN (Zeiss Company, Jena, Germany). Raman spectra were conducted on an inVia Reflex Raman spectrometer (Renishaw Company, Gloucestershire, UK). UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a UV-2102 spectrophotometer (UNICO Company, Shanghai, China). Electrochemical tests including cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), chronampermetry (CA), and chronocoulometry (CC) were done on a CHI 650A electrochemical analyzer (CHI Instrumental, Shanghai, China) using a conventional three-electrode system.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of GO-NCNTs Dispersion

It has been reported previously that CNTs can be bonded to GO through π-π interaction [31]. Therefore, NCNTs can also be incorporated to GO sheets. The inset of Figure 1 shows the GO (curve a) and GO-NCNTs (curve b) homogeneous dispersion. It is clear that the change of color from yellow to black was found after the NCNTs were added and dispersed. Moreover, UV-vis absorption spectra experiments were used to compare the absorption band change of GO and GO-NCNTs. As can be seen in Figure 1, the characteristic absorptions of GO are observed at about 240 nm and 310 nm, and GO-NCNTs give an obvious increase in absorbance, indicating that NCNTs have been bonded to GO sheets through π-π interaction.
Further the AFM image showed the morphology of GO and GO-NCNTs (Figure 2). The result exhibited that the average thickness of GO sheets is ≈1 nm; suggesting GO sheets were almost single-layer (Figure 2A). However, the average thickness of GO-NCNTs increased to about 30 nm (Figure 2B), and many nanowires on the surface of GO sheets were observed, which further confirmed that the NCNTs have been successfully bonded onto GO.

3.2. Electrochemical Deposition and Characterization of 3DG-NCNTs Network

According to a previous report, the graphene sheets prepared by the CV technique were mainly laid down at the surface of the electrode (2D planar structure) [32]. On the other hand, the potentiostatic method (PM) can fabricate the 3D graphene network with a porous structure [32]. Recently, we reported that PPM can make uniform and crumpled reduced graphene sheets [29,30]. The reduced graphene sheets are nearly vertically aligned to the surface of the electrode. Therefore, we decided on PPM to fabricate the 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs modified electrode.
To evaluate the structural characterization of the 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs films prepared by PPM, morphologies of the 3DG (Figure 3A) and 3DG-NCNTs (Figure 3B) modified electrodes were characterized using SEM. As can be seen in Figure 3, a highly porous and uniform interconnected network of 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs is observed on the electrode surface, respectively. The porous walls consist of upright oriented graphene sheets, which facilitate the access of target analyte to the electrode surface. Besides, to this 3DG-NCNTs network, NCNTs like a wire connect the isolated graphene sheets. The 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs network modified electrode was further characterized by Raman spectra. Figure 4 shows the Raman spectra of 3DG (curve a) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve b) modified GC electrode. The Raman spectra of 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs have two dominant peaks around 1310 and 1580 cm−1, which are assigned to the D and G bands of graphene sheets, respectively. From the Raman spectra of 3DG, the intensity ratio of D to G band peaks is calculated as 1.6. However, by introducing NCNTs to the 3DG, the ID/IG ratio greatly increased to 1.8 and a distinct 2D band appeared, indicating the restoration of sp2 conjugated domains in the graphitic structures [33].
In order to demonstrate electrochemical properties, we used [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− as a redox probe to directly investigate the charge transfer property of different electrodes [34]. Compared with the bare GC electrode, both cathodic and anodic peak currents (ip) increase significantly and peak to peak separation (ΔEp) values decrease obviously at 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrodes (Figure 5A), which indicate that 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs networks can offer high conductivity, respectively. Interestingly, the largest ip and the smallest ΔEp of the redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− are observed at the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode. The result confirms that the presence of NCNTs can increase the electron transfer at the interface and result in a more conductive network. Furthermore, the average electroactivity area of different electrodes can be obtained based on the Randles-Sevcik Equation [35]: ip = 2.69 × 105n3/2ADo1/2cov1/2. The average electroactivity areas of the bare GC electrode, 3DG, and 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrodes were calculated as 0.062, 0.145, and 0.232 cm2, respectively. The average electroactivity areas of 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs network modified GC electrodes increase significantly. This could be attributed to the formation of a highly porous 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs network. To further test that the 3D structure has a direct influence on the electrochemical performance of the modified electrode, the 3DG and 3DG-MWCNTs network modified GC electrodes were left to dry in the air. Under this circumstance, the entrapped water inside the network evaporated gradually. The result caused the 3D highly porous structure to collapse and form a compact 2D layer due to the strong π-π interactions. As a result, the ip of the redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− decreased dramatically and ΔEp increase obviously in its dry state as shown in Figure 5A (curve d and curve e). Therefore, the modified electrodes must be kept in DDW to prevent the collapse of the porous network when not in use.
The influence of the NCNTs ratio (NMWCNTs:GO) on electrochemical characterization of the 3DG-NCNTs network was also studied by using [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− (Figure 5B). It is clear that the current grows on increasing the NCNTs. However, when the ratio of NCNTs was greater than 1:5, the current did not increase but significantly decreased and a 3DG-NCNTs film was not observed on the surface of the electrode. The reason might be that it was made difficult to electrochemically reduce the GO-NCNTs because amounts of NCNTs were bonded onto the GO. Therefore, we chose 1:10 as the optimal ratio.

3.3. Voltammetric Behavior of Urapidil at 3DG-NCNTs Network Modified GC Electrode

The electrochemical response of urapidil at different electrodes was investigated by using CV and DPV techniques. Figure 6A shows the cyclic voltammetric response recorded at the bare GC electrode, 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs network modified GC electrode. As can be seen, only a very weak and broad irreversible oxidation peak is observed for urapidil on the bare GC electrode, suggesting that the oxidation activity of urapidil is very sluggish. In contrast, the oxidation peak current (ipa) increases dramatically on the surface of the 3DG and 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode. Also, the largest ipa and the lowest oxidation peak potential (Epa) is obtained on the surface of 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode, indicating the 3DG-NCNTs network prepared is the most active for the oxidation of urapidil. The same result was also found for the electrochemical response of urapidil using the DPV technique (Figure 6B). Besides, the ipa of urapidil on the surface of 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode is 20.4 and 1.9 fold higher than that of the bare GC electrode and 3DG modified GC electrode, respectively. These results can be attributed not only to the enlargement of the electroactive area of the GC electrode due to the presence of the highly porous 3DG-NCNTs network , but also to the contribution of NCNTs as electron wires that promote the conductivity of the modifier film. Therefore, the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode was selected as the electrochemical sensor for investigating the voltammetric behavior of urapidil and establishing the electroanalytical method.
The kinetics for the electro-oxidation of urapidil on the surface of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode was studied by recording cyclic voltammograms (CVs) at different potential scan rates(v) (Figure 6C). With increasing v, the ipa grows gradually and the plot of ipa and v shows a good linear relationship, indicating that this is an adsorption-controlled process. Moreover, the Epa shifts positively on increasing v and the plot of Epa and lnv shows also a good linear relationship. The linear equation was represented as Epa (V) = 0.770 + 0.029lnv (mV·s−1) (R = 0.998). According to Laviron’s theory [36], αn = 0.89 can be obtained from the slope. Then n = 2 can be achieved, with the value of α estimated from the peak width at half-height [36]. At the same time, the apparent rate constant (ks) of 1.45 s−1 can be also calculated from the intercept.
To illustrate the effect of pH value on the voltammetric behavior of urapidil at the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode, CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil were recorded at different pHs (from 2.0 to 8.0) of 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer solutions (PBS) (Figure 6D). It was found that on increasing the pH values, the Ep shifted negatively, which suggests the participation of H+ ions in the oxidation reaction. Moreover, the ipa of urapidil reached its maximum at pH = 6. Hence, PBS of pH 6.0 was used in the further experiments.

3.4. Chronoamperometry and Chronocoulometry Investigations

CA was performed to evaluate the catalytic rate constant (kcat) for the electro-oxidation of urapidil on the surface of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode. Figure 7A shows chronoamperometric curves of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode in the absence (curve a) and with 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1urapidil (curve b). According to our previous report [30], the corresponding icat/iL versus t1/2 plot is presented and shown as the inset in Figure 7A. From the slope of the straight line, the kcat is calculated to be 1.25 × 103 mol L−1 s−1, which is much larger than that of the bare GC electrode (87.9 mol·L−1·s−1) and the 3DG network modified GC electrode (0.94 × 103 mol·L−1·s−1). The result verifies that the 3DG-NCNTs network can provide a more efficient interface for the electro-oxidation of urapidil.
At the same time, CC was also done to determine the saturating absorption capacity (Γ*) for urapidil on the surface of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode. Figure 7B shows chronocoulometric curves of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode in the background (curve a) and with 5.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 urapidil (curve b). According to the formula given by Anson [37], the corresponding Q~t1/2 plots are performed and shown as the inset in Figure 7B. Using the equation reported earlier: Q = nFAΓ* [38] and the intercept difference between curves a and b, Γ* is obtained to be 7.53 × 10−9 mol·cm−2. The result is much higher than that of the vbare GC electrode (9.72 × 10−11 mol·cm−2) and 3DG network modified GC electrode (2.91 × 10−9 mol·cm−2). It therefore indicates that the 3DG-MWCNTs network is effective for enlargement of the loading amount of urapidil due to enlargement of the effective surface area.

3.5. Analytical Application and Method Validation

3.5.1. Optimization of Accumulation Conditions

In the optimization of experimental parameters, the influence of the accumulation time (tacc) and accumulation potential (Eacc) on the electrochemical response characteristic of urapidil was estimated by recording the ipa using DPV. The 3DG-MWCNTs modified electrode was immersed in 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil solution for a certain period of time (from 30 to 240 s) to allow the infiltration of urapidil to the inner parts of the network. As clearly shown in Figure 8A, an accumulation step at open circuit condition has a significance influence on the electrochemical response of urapidil. The ipa increased greatly within 180 s and then enhanced only slowly on increasing tacc. As a result, 180 s was set as the accumulation time. On the other hand, the Eacc(0.10–0.40 V) had little influence on the ipa. So the accumulation was carried out at open circuit condition.

3.5.2. Analytical Performances

Under the optimum conditions, the calibration curve for urapidil determination was established. Figure 8B displays the response of different concentrations of urapidil by differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry (DPASV). The ipa is linearly proportional to urapidil concentrations in the range of 1.0 × 10−8–2.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 as represented by the following equations: ipa (μA) = 4.52 + 71.83c (μmol·L−1) (R = 0.999) (the inset of Figure 8B). A limit of detection (LOD) of 5.0 × 10−9 mol·L−1 is calculated by signal-to-noise ratio of 3 (S/N) [39]. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with previously reported methods for the electrochemical determination of urapidil [10,11] and the results are listed in Table 1. It is obvious that the proposed method exhibited a lower detection limit and wider linear ranges, which indicate that the 3DG-NCNTs networks fabricated by PPM can be used satisfactorily as electrochemical sensor materials.
The reproducibility of the modified electrode fabricated for urapidil sensing, expressed in terms of relative standard deviation, was determined to be 3.1% at a urapidil concentration of 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1. Renewal of the electrode could be achieved upon immersion of the electrochemical sensor in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0) for 5 min under constant stirring, and CV was carried out in the potential ranging from 0.20 V to 0.80 V (vs. SCE) until the peaks of urapidil disappeared. After five renewal/sensing cycles, DPASV response to a 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil solution decreased by 5.7% (Figure 8C). In addition, the long-term stability test of the sensor when stored at 4 °C for 2 weeks showed a loss of 4.2% when tested upon the addition of 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil.

3.5.3. Interference Studies

To evaluate the effect of potential interfering compounds, we compared the electrochemical response toward 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil before and after adding 10-fold amounts of starch, glucose, theophyline, ascorbic acid, uric acid, dopamine, and epinephrine. As seen from Figure 8D, the electrochemical response did not change significantly (≤5%). Moreover, it was also observed that 200-fold of Ca2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, and Fe2+ had almost no influence on the oxidation peak of urapidil. These results clearly confirmed that the electrochemical sensor had excellent selectivity.

3.6. Determination of Urapidil in a Tablet Sample

To test the feasibility of the developed method for the analysis of tablet samples, the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode was applied for the determination of urapidil content in commercial tablets using a standard addition method. The tablet samples were processed according to previous work [11]. The results of the proposed method were compared to those using UV-visible methods (Table 2). The results of these tests revealed that the method is well adapted for urapidil detection in tablet samples. Compared to the UV-visible method, no significant difference was obtained.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we presented a simple yet effective way to fabricate 3DG-NCNTs network on the surface of a GC electrode using PPM in a GO-NCNTs homogeneous dispersion. The prepared network exhibits a larger accessible surface area as well as higher conductivity by incorporation of NCNTs into the 3D network. The 3DG-NCNTs network was applied as a new voltammetric material for the fabrication of the electrochemical platform for determination of urapidil, which showed a wider linear range and a low detection limit. Moreover, good sensitivity and selectivity make it very suitable for determination of urapidil content in tablet samples with excellent recoveries as confirmed by the UV-visible method.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial sponsored program for science＆technology innovation talents in Universities of Henan Province (16HASTIT002), and the National Science Foundation of China (No. 21572046).

Author Contributions

Fei Wang and Kui Lu conceived and designed the experiments; Yanju Wu, Anxing Zhou, and Huimin Yang performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Kui Lu contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Yanju Wu and Fei Wang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alijotas-Reig, J.; Bove-Farre, I.; de Cabo-Frances, F.; Angles-Coll, R. Effectiveness and safety of prehospital urapidil for hypertensive emergencies. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2001, 19, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hirschl, M.M.; Binder, M.; Bur, A.; Herkner, H.; Müllner, M.; Woisetschläger, C.; Laggner, A.N. Safety and efficacy of urapidil and sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Intensive Care Med. 1997, 23, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yue, Q.; Song, Z.; Wang, C. Rapid determination of subnanogram urapidil using flow injection enhancement chemiluminescence. J. Anal. Chem. 2006, 61, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lang, H.Y.; Li, Y.R.; Zhang, W.P.; Zhang, X.J.; Shen, Y.H. Determination of urapidil by flow injection chemiluminescence. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2003, 24, 618–620. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai, D.; Zhang, Q. HPLC analysis of urapidil in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian J. Chem. 2012, 24, 315–318. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ambavaram, V.B.R.; Nandigam, V.; Vemula, M.; Kalluru, G.R.; Gajulapalle, M. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantification of urapidil and aripiprazole in human plasma and its application to human pharmacokinetic study. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2013, 27, 916–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ma, J.; Lin, G.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, L. Determination of urapidil hydrochloride in rabbit plasma by LC-MS-MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2011, 34, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, S.; Wei, Y.; Long, C.; Deng, B. Capillary electrophoresis with end-column electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive determination of urapidil hydrochloride in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetics study. J. Chromatogr. B 2015, 1006, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, Y.R.; Lang, H.Y.; Wei, Y.F.; Zhang, W.P. Determination of urapidil by flow-injection indriect atomic absorption spectrometry. Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 2003, 22, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zheng, L.; Song, J. Voltammetric behavior of urapidil and its determination at multi-wall carbon nanotube paste electrode. Talanta 2007, 73, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, K.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, W.; Ye, B. Sensitive determination of urapidil at an electrochemically pretreated glassy carbon electrode by linear sweep voltammetry. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 6548–6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Biswas, C.; Lee, Y.H. Graphene versus carbon nanotubes in electronic devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 3806–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hou, J.B.; Shao, Y.Y.; Ellis, M.W.; Moore, R.B.; Yi, B.L. Graphene-based electrochemical energy conversion and storage: Fuel cells, supercapacitors and lithium ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15384–15402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shao, Y.Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A.; Lin, Y.H. Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: A review. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yan, J.; Wei, T.; Shao, B.; Ma, F.Q.; Fan, Z.J.; Zhang, M.L.; Zheng, C.; Shang, Y.C.; Qian, W.Z.; Wei, F. Electrochemical properties of grapheme nanosheet/carbon black composites as electrodes for supercapacitors. Carbon 2010, 48, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, B.G.; Yang, M.H.; Hong, W.H.; Choi, J.W.; Huh, Y.S. 3D macroporous graphene frameworks for supercapacitors with high energy and power densities. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 4020–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bai, H.; Li, C.; Wang, X.L.; Shi, G.Q. On the gelation of graphene oxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5545–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.P.; Ren, W.C.; Gao, L.B.; Liu, B.L.; Pei, S.F.; Cheng, H.M. Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, K.W.; Chen, L.B.; Chen, Y.Q.; Bai, H.; Li, L. Three-dimensional porous graphene-based composite materials: Electrochemical synthesis and application. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20968–20976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saidin, M.I.; Isa, I.M.; Ahmad, M.; Hashim, N.; Ab Ghani, S. Analysis of trace nickel by square wave stripping voltammetry using chloropalladium(II) complex-modified MWCNTs paste electrode. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2017, 240, 848–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yao, L.; Teng, J.; Zhu, M.; Zheng, L.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, G.; Xue, F.; Chen, W. MWCNTs based high sensitive lateral flow strip biosensor for rapid determination of aqueous mercury ions. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 85, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, C.; Jia, N. MWCNTs-PEI composites-based electrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of bisphenol A. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2016, 235, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vikkisk, M.; Kruusenberg, I.; Joost, U.; Shulga, E.; Tammeveski, K. Electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on nitrogen-containing multi-walled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 87, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsierkezos, N.G.; Othman, S.H.; Ritter, U. Nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes for paracetamol sensing. Ionics 2013, 19, 1897–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wen, B.; Song, X.; Li, T. Preparation and electrochemical properties of nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, F.; Wu, Y.; Lu, K.; Ye, B. A sensitive voltammetric sensor for taxifolin based on graphene nanosheets with certain orientation modified glassy carbon electrode. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2015, 208, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, F.; Wu, Y.; Lu, K.; Gao, L.; Ye, B. A simple, rapid and green method based on pulsed potentiostatic electrodeposition of reduced graphene oxide on glass carbon electrode for sensitive voltammetric detection of sophoridine. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 141, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mani, V.; Chen, S.M.; Lou, B.S. Three dimensional graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes and graphene-carbon nanotubes hybrids. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 11641–11660. [Google Scholar]
  32. Asadian, E.; Shahrokhian, S.; Zad, A.I.; Ghorbani-Bidkorbeh, F. Glassy carbon electrode modified with 3D graphene-carbon nanotube network for sensitive electrochemical determination of methotrexate. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2017, 239, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Shi, L.; Zhu, X.; Lan, M.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, Z.H. Electrochemical sensing of nicotine using screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with nitrogen-doped graphene sheets. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 784, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, P.H.; Fryling, M.A.; McCreery, R.L. Electron Transfer Kinetics at Modified Carbon Electrode Surfaces: The Role of Specific Surface Sites. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 3115–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R. Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 148–150. [Google Scholar]
  36. Laviron, E. General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1979, 101, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anson, F.C. Application of Potentiostatic Current Integration to the Study of the Adsorption of Cobalt(III)-(Ethylenedinitrilo)tetraacetate on Mercury Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 932–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palanisamy, S.; Karuppiah, C.; Chen, S.M.; Emmanuel, R.; Muthukrishnan, P.; Prakash, P. Direct electrochemistry of myoglobin at silver nanoparticles/myoglobin biocomposite: Application for hydrogen peroxide sensing. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2014, 202, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miller, J.N.; Miller, J.C. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 4th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2000; pp. 120–125. [Google Scholar]
Materials 11 00322 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Chemical structure of urapidil.
Scheme 1. Chemical structure of urapidil.
Materials 11 00322 sch001
Materials 11 00322 g001 550
Figure 1. UV-visible absorption spectra of graphene-oxide (GO) (a) and graphene oxide-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (GO-NCNTs) (b); the inset shows the objects of GO (a) and GO-NCNTs (b).
Figure 1. UV-visible absorption spectra of graphene-oxide (GO) (a) and graphene oxide-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (GO-NCNTs) (b); the inset shows the objects of GO (a) and GO-NCNTs (b).
Materials 11 00322 g001
Materials 11 00322 g002 550
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of GO (A) and GO-NCNTs (B) from their dilute aqueous dispersion on freshly cleaned mica.
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of GO (A) and GO-NCNTs (B) from their dilute aqueous dispersion on freshly cleaned mica.
Materials 11 00322 g002
Materials 11 00322 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images obtained from 3DG (A) and 3D graphene-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (3DG-NCNTs) (B) modified glassy carbon (GC) electrode.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images obtained from 3DG (A) and 3D graphene-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes (3DG-NCNTs) (B) modified glassy carbon (GC) electrode.
Materials 11 00322 g003
Materials 11 00322 g004 550
Figure 4. Raman spectra of 3DG (curve a) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve b) modified GC electrode.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of 3DG (curve a) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve b) modified GC electrode.
Materials 11 00322 g004
Materials 11 00322 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b), 3DG-NCNTs (curve c), 2DG (curve d), 2DG-NCNTs (curve e) modified GC electrode in 1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl solution; (B) CVs of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode prepared in different portions of NCNTs solution in 1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl solution, NCNTs portion: (a) 1:20, (b) 1:10, (c) 1:5, v = 0.05 V·s−1.
Figure 5. (A) Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b), 3DG-NCNTs (curve c), 2DG (curve d), 2DG-NCNTs (curve e) modified GC electrode in 1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl solution; (B) CVs of the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode prepared in different portions of NCNTs solution in 1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl solution, NCNTs portion: (a) 1:20, (b) 1:10, (c) 1:5, v = 0.05 V·s−1.
Materials 11 00322 g005
Materials 11 00322 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve c) modified GC electrode in 0.2 mol·L−1 phosphate buffer solutions (PBS, pH = 6.0), v = 0.05 V·s−1; (B) differential pulse voltammetry (DPVs) of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on the bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve c) modified GC electrode in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0); (C) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode at different scan rates; (D) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode at different pH values, v = 0.05 V·s−1.
Figure 6. (A) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve c) modified GC electrode in 0.2 mol·L−1 phosphate buffer solutions (PBS, pH = 6.0), v = 0.05 V·s−1; (B) differential pulse voltammetry (DPVs) of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on the bare GC electrode (curve a), 3DG (curve b) and 3DG-NCNTs (curve c) modified GC electrode in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0); (C) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode at different scan rates; (D) CVs of 1.0 × 10−6 mol·L−1 urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode at different pH values, v = 0.05 V·s−1.
Materials 11 00322 g006
Materials 11 00322 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Chronoamperometric curves of the background (curve a) and 1.0 × 10−4 mol·L−1 urapidil (curve b) in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0) on the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode, the inset shows the corresponding relationship of icat/iL versus t1/2; (B) Chronocoulometric curves of the background (curve a) and 5.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 urapidil (curve b) in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0) on the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode; the inset shows the corresponding relationship of Q versus t1/2.
Figure 7. (A) Chronoamperometric curves of the background (curve a) and 1.0 × 10−4 mol·L−1 urapidil (curve b) in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0) on the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode, the inset shows the corresponding relationship of icat/iL versus t1/2; (B) Chronocoulometric curves of the background (curve a) and 5.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 urapidil (curve b) in 0.2 mol·L−1 PBS (pH = 6.0) on the 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode; the inset shows the corresponding relationship of Q versus t1/2.
Materials 11 00322 g007
Materials 11 00322 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) Peak current vs. accumulation time plots for 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil at open circuit condition; (B) DPASVs of different concentration of urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode under the optimum conditions; the inset shows corresponding calibration curve of c for ipa; (C) Influence of renewal step on the ipa detected on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode; (D) Influence of different interfering compounds on the ipa detected on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode.
Figure 8. (A) Peak current vs. accumulation time plots for 5.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 urapidil at open circuit condition; (B) DPASVs of different concentration of urapidil on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode under the optimum conditions; the inset shows corresponding calibration curve of c for ipa; (C) Influence of renewal step on the ipa detected on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode; (D) Influence of different interfering compounds on the ipa detected on 3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrode.
Materials 11 00322 g008
Table
Table 1. Comparison of determination of urapidil by the different sensing methods reported.
Table 1. Comparison of determination of urapidil by the different sensing methods reported.
ElectrodeMethodsLinear Range (mol·L−1)Detection Limit (mol·L−1)Reference
Multi-wall carbon nanotube paste electrodeDPV5.0 × 10−8~2.0 × 10−63.8 × 10−8[10]
Electrochemically pretreated GC electrodeLSV2.0 × 10−8~5.0 × 10−62.0 × 10−8[11]
3DG-NCNTs modified GC electrodeDPV1.0 × 10−8~2.0 × 10−65.0 × 10−9This work
DPV: differential pulse voltammetry; GC: glassy carbon; 3DG-NCNTs: 3D graphene-nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes LSV: linear sweep voltammetry.
Table
Table 2. Determination of results of urapidil in tablet samples by differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry (DPASV).
Table 2. Determination of results of urapidil in tablet samples by differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry (DPASV).
DPASV (n = 3) aUV-Vis
SamplesOriginal Found (μmol·L−1)Standard Added (μmol·L−1)Total Found (μmol·L−1)RSD (%)Recovery (%)Original Found (μmol·L−1)RSD (%)
Tablet b0.49(30.4 mg·tablet−1)0.300.783.496.70.501.9
0.501.012.9104.0
1.001.454.196.0
a. Average of three determinations; b. Marked urapidil content: 30 mg·tablet−1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.; Zhou, A.; Yang, H.; Wang, F.; Lu, K. 3D Graphene-Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanotubes Network Modified Electrode as Sensing Materials for the Determination of Urapidil. Materials 2018, 11, 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020322

AMA Style

Wu Y, Zhou A, Yang H, Wang F, Lu K. 3D Graphene-Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanotubes Network Modified Electrode as Sensing Materials for the Determination of Urapidil. Materials. 2018; 11(2):322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yanju, Anxing Zhou, Huimin Yang, Fei Wang, and Kui Lu. 2018. "3D Graphene-Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanotubes Network Modified Electrode as Sensing Materials for the Determination of Urapidil" Materials 11, no. 2: 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020322

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop