Next Article in Journal
In Situ Generation of Fluorescent Copper Nanoclusters Embedded in Monolithic Eggshell Membrane: Properties and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Forming Quality Analysis on the Cold Roll Forming C-channel Steel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/ma11101912
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Ultrasonication-Assisted Cobalt Hydroxide Composite with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity toward Oxygen Evolution Reaction

by
Yujun Si
1,*,
Chaozhong Guo
2,*,
Chenglong Xie
1 and
Zhongping Xiong
1
1
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China
2
Research Institute for New Materials Technology, Engineering Research Center of New Energy Storage Devices and Applications, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(10), 1912; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101912
Submission received: 11 August 2018 / Revised: 29 September 2018 / Accepted: 29 September 2018 / Published: 9 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Catalytic Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A catalyst toward oxygen evolution reaction (OER) was synthesized by depositing cobalt hydroxide on carbon black. Ultrasonication was applied during precipitation to improve the performance of the catalyst. The ultrasonic-assisted process resulted in the refinement of the cobalt hydroxide particles from 400 nm to 50 nm, and the thorough incorporation of these particles with carbon black substrate. The resulting product exhibited enhanced OER catalytic activity with an onset potential of 1.54 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode), a Tafel slope of 18.18 mV/dec, and a stable OER potential at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, because of the reduced resistance of the catalyst and the electron transfer resistance.

1. Introduction

Clean and renewable energy sources are urgently needed to be developed to address the increasing energy crisis and pollution problems. Hydrogen, as a high-energy density noncarbon energy source, has been considered as a clean energy source, and its production has been one of the top research hotspots. Electrochemical water splitting is an effective approach to convert renewable energy sources to promising hydrogen energy [1,2,3,4,5]. This process involves a hydrogen evolution reaction at the cathode, and an oxygen evolution reaction (OER, 4OH− → O2 + 2H2O + 4e− in alkaline solution) at the anode. The OER is the major obstacle for water splitting, because this process is kinetically sluggish, involving a complex four-electron transfer with high overpotential [6,7,8]. Considerable attention has been paid to developing efficient catalysts for OER with low overpotential and high activity.
IrO2 and RuO2 have been demonstrated as the best OER electrocatalysts [9,10]. However, their large-scale applications are blocked by their high prices and limited natural reserves. The first-row transition metal oxides have been extensively investigated because of their natural abundance, low cost, environmental-friendliness, and high catalytic activity [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Studies have suggested that the oxy-hydroxides of nickel, cobalt, and iron are promising electrocatalysts for the OER. Co3O4 [17,18,19] and Co(OH)2 [20,21,22], synthesized by different methods have been widely investigated because of their high stability and high catalytic activity (theoretically, Co3O4 can close the OER activity of RuO2 and IrO2). However, the development of oxy-hydroxides of cobalt with high electrocatalytic activity to OER remains a major challenge because of poor electrical conductivity and limited exposed active sites.
To obtain an OER catalyst with better conductivity, transition metal oxide catalysts are mixed with conductive materials, such as carbon black, with the aid of polymeric binders in actual application. However, the utilization of insulating binders can reduce the electrocatalytic performance [23,24]. An efficient strategy to overcome this shortage is by fabricating nanoparticles of OER catalysts and naturally immobilizing the nanoparticles onto the conductive substrates. Fabrication of composites of oxy-hydroxides of cobalt with functionalized carbon-based materials (e.g., heteroatom-doped graphene and carbon nanotubes) has received special interest. This process can improve the poor conductivity of metal oxides, and the resulting catalysts also usually exhibit bifunctional catalytic activities [25,26]. The morphologies of the transition metal oxides also play a key role in the heterogeneous electrocatalytic reaction, because more catalytic active sites can be exposed to facilitate the OER by refining the particle sizes or by increasing the porosity of the catalysts with greater specific surface area [27,28].
Ultrasonication is a nonconventional technique that has been proven to be superior on operation, product selectivity, and reduced reaction time. Ultrasonication can bring instantaneous generation, and the growth and collapse of micrometer-sized bubbles in liquid medium, which is helpful for the synthesis of nanostructured materials. Recently, the use of ultrasonication in chemistry has grown significantly [29,30,31]. In the present work, we prepared cobalt hydroxide [Co(OH)2] by parallel flow precipitation on carbon black with the assistance of ultrasonication. The particles of Co(OH)2 were refined and well incorporated with the carbon black substrate, and the resulting catalyst shows enhanced OER catalytic activity.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of the Catalyst

A mixed solvent (pH 10) from 30 mL of deionized water and 30 mL of ethanol was placed in a water bath (50 °C) with an ultrasonic generator (40 kHz). Then, 2 g of carbon black (VXC72R, Cabot) was dispersed into the solvent under ultrasonication and mechanical stirring. Afterward, 30 mL of Co(NO3)2·6H2O solution (1.0 mol L−1, 0.03 mol) and 30 mL of KOH solution (2.0 mol L−1, 0.06 mol) were added into the mixed solvent at 1.0 mL min−1 by two peristaltic pumps. Then, ultrasonication and stirring were terminated, by keeping the reaction system in the water bath for another 10 h, followed by filtering and washing with deionized water until pH 7, drying at 80 °C for 10 h. The resulting catalyst was denoted as ultra-Co(OH)2/C. As a control, Co(OH)2/C was prepared by the same procedure but without the assistance of ultrasonication during precipitation.

2.2. Physical Characterizations

The phase structure of the catalyst was determined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (DX-2600, Fangyuan, Dandong, China). The morphology was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Gemini SEM 300, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The OER catalytic activity of the catalyst was evaluated by electrochemical measurements performed in 0.1 M KOH solution on a CHI760E workstation (Chenhua, Shanghai, China) with a platinum sheet as a counter-electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode, and a glassy carbon electrode (Φ = 0.5 cm) coated with the catalyst as a working electrode by pipetting 10 μL of dispersion of catalyst (including commercial RuO2, 10 mg mL−1 of concentration) onto the electrode surface and naturally drying in air. The catalyst loading on the working electrode was 0.51 mg cm−2. Electrochemical linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was conducted at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. The OER potential was recorded by chronopotentiometry at a current density of 10 mA cm−2. The dispersion of catalyst was also dropped on graphite paper and carried out the chronopotentiometry test for 5 h, and then its micromorphology was observed. The electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) was tested over a frequency range from 105 Hz to 0.1 Hz. All of the potentials were converted to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the equation ERHE = ESCE + 0.2415 V + 0.0591 pH (pH 13).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the preparation of the Co(OH)2/C catalysts without/with ultrasonication, and the morphologies of the resulting catalysts. Once the solutions of Co(NO3)2 and KOH were dropped into the suspension containing carbon black, the Co2+ ions immediately reacted with the OH− ions to form the Co(OH)2 precipitates. These precipitates were deposited onto the surface of carbon black to yield the Co(OH)2/C catalyst.
During the initial stage of precipitation, the Co(OH)2 particles were small and had greater surface Gibbs free energies. The particles spontaneously assembled to form bigger crystals under quiet conditions. However, crystal growth was destroyed once ultrasonication was imposed on the reaction system. The SEM images in Figure 1 show that the hexagonal crystals of Co(OH)2 with size of approximately 400 nm can be observed in the Co(OH)2/C catalyst. The Co(OH)2 particles were bigger than that of carbon black, and they were not well incorporated with each other. However, only spherical particles with sizes of less than 50 nm could be observed, and no obvious Co(OH)2 particles with regular shapes were found in the ultra-Co(OH)2/C prepared with the assistance of ultrasonication. The results indicate that Co(OH)2 crystal could not grow well because of the disturbance caused by ultrasonication during precipitation. The Co(OH)2 precipitates existed as small particles, and they were absorbed on the surface of carbon black. Thus, better distribution and incorporation with carbon black substrate was found in ultra-Co(OH)2/C.
Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C. The cobalt element mainly existed as Co(OH)2 (JCPDS No. 30-0443) in the catalysts. The crystallite sizes of Co(OH)2 were calculated by the Scherrer Equation from three lattice planes (001), (100), and (101), and they were listed in the XRD patterns. Apparently, the crystallites were also refined by ultrasonication.
The electrocatalytic performance of the catalysts to the OER was investigated in 0.1 M KOH solution. Figure 3a shows the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of the OER on the catalysts of Co(OH)2/C, ultra-Co(OH)2/C, and pure commercial RuO2. The OER onset potential of RuO2 was approximately 1.52 V, while those of Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C were approximately 1.54 V. The similar potentials show that the OER catalytic activity of Co(OH)2 was close to the OER activity of the benchmark RuO2 catalyst. However, the OER current densities of the three catalysts were different from each other. At the same potential of 1.66 V, the OER current density was 6.16 mA cm−2 on the ultra-Co(OH)2/C, which was greater than the 4.05 mA cm−2 of the Co(OH)2/C and the 2.95 mA cm−2 of RuO2. The improvement in catalytic performance of ultra-Co(OH)2/C can be attributed to its smaller particle size and better conductivity.
The LSV curves were converted to Tafel plots and fitted by the Tafel equation (η = a + blgj, where η is the overpotential, j is the current density, and b is the Tafel slope) to examine the catalytic kinetics of the catalysts, as shown in Figure 3b. As expected, the ultra-Co(OH)2/C showed a Tafel slope of 18.18 mV/dec, which was less than the 18.92 mV/dec of the Co(OH)2/C and 20.25 mV/dec of RuO2. Thus, the ultra-Co(OH)2/C could achieve higher current density at a lower overpotential than the Co(OH)2/C and RuO2 catalysts. Figure 4 presents the OER performed at 10 mA cm−2 of current density, and the SEM imagines of the two catalysts after catalyzing OER for 5 h. The electrode potential of ultra-Co(OH)2/C remained stable at a lower level in the OER process. However, the overpotential of Co(OH)2/C catalyst was greater, and it increased with the reaction time. As shown in the SEM images, the hexagonal crystals of Co(OH)2 in Co(OH)2/C catalyst disappeared after the OER. The broken crystals of Co(OH)2 in the OER process deteriorated the catalysis performance of the Co(OH)2/C catalyst.
These results indicate that the ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalyst has better OER catalytic performance than the Co(OH)2/C catalyst. This characteristic was due to the fact that the Co(OH)2 particles were smaller in the ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalyst than in the Co(OH)2/C catalyst without the disturbance from the ultrasonication during precipitation. Consequently, the Co(OH)2 in the ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalyst had a greater electrochemical specific surface area and more exposed active sites to catalyze the oxygen evolution reaction.
To further investigate the charge transfer kinetics during the OER, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed at 1.66 V of potential, at which OER were catalyzed both on the two catalysts. Figure 5a shows that the Nyquist curves of the Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalysts were composed of a small capacitive semi-circle at the high-frequency region, and a large capacitive semi-circle at the low-frequency region. The smaller impedance of the ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalyst (Figure 5b) corresponded to better conductivity. Two peaks existed in the Bode plots of the phase angle versus frequency, as shown in Figure 5c. Thus, the impedance spectra could be fitted by an equivalent circuit model with two time constants, as shown in Figure 5d. Herein, Rs represents the resistance of the electrolyte between the reference and working electrodes. Rf is the resistance of the catalyst itself. Q is the constant phase element in the catalyst. Rct is the electron transfer resistance in the OER process. Cdl is a double-layer capacitance on the catalyst surface.
The values of the equivalent circuit elements were fitted using ZSimpDemo software (3.30d, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Among of these elements, Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C have Rf values of 4.063 ohm cm2 and 3.205 ohm cm2, respectively, and corresponding Rct values of 8.448 ohm cm2 and 5.487 ohm cm2. The reduced resistances reveal the smaller obstacle in the OER. Meanwhile, the 0.0173 F cm−2 of Cdl of ultra-Co(OH)2/C is greater than the 0.0073 F cm−2 of Co(OH)2/C. This result indicates the greater specific surface area and the greater number of active sites of ultra-Co(OH)2/C to facilitate the OER.

4. Conclusions

An OER catalyst ultra-Co(OH)2/C was fabricated by a parallel flow precipitate method with the assistance of ultrasonication. The growth of regular hexagonal crystals of Co(OH)2 was controlled using ultrasonication, and they decreased from approximately 400 nm to less than 50 nm. The smaller sizes of Co(OH)2 particles exhibit more active sites on the catalyst surface while they promote the formation of a more stable catalytically active film, upon mixing with carbon black. Due to these reasons, the ultra-Co(OH)2/C showed better OER catalytic activity with an onset potential of 1.54 V and a Tafel slope of 18.18 mV/dec, which ensured that the ultra-Co(OH)2/C worked well at a more stable and lower potential in the actual OER process. The conductivity of the catalyst was also improved because of the smaller particle of Co(OH)2 and the better incorporation with carbon black. The resistance Rf of the ultra-Co(OH)2/C itself and the electron transfer resistance Rct during the OER were reduced by 21% and 35% compared to those observed in the case of Co(OH)2/C, without the assistance of ultrasonication, leading ultimately to improved catalytic performance in the oxygen evolution reaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; Methodology and experiment, Y.S., C.G., C.X.; Software, Z.X.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, Y.S.; Writing-Review & Editing, C.G.; Funding Acquisition, Y.S., C.G.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Fundation of China (NSFC 21805024), the Basic and Frontier Research Program of Chongqing Municipality (cstc2018jcyjAX0461, cstc2015jcyjA50032), the College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project of SUSE (No. cx2017017), and the Open Project of Engineering Research Center of New Energy Storage Devices and Applications of Chongqing Municipality (No. KF20170201).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. McCrory, C.C.L.; Jung, S.; Ferrer, I.M.; Chatman, S.M.; Peters, J.C.; Jaramillo, T.F. Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4347–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kuai, L.; Geng, J.; Chen, C.; Kan, E.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Geng, B. A reliable aerosol-spray-assisted approach to produce and optimize amorphous metal oxide catalysts for electrochemical water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7547–7551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jamesh, M.I.; Sun, X. Recent progress on earth abundant electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline medium to achieve efficient water splitting—A review. J. Power Sources 2018, 400, 31–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liao, P.Q.; Shen, J.Q.; Zhang, J.P. Metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 373, 22–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, J.; Wang, Y.Z.; Wang, C.C.; Lu, S.Y. In situ formation of NiO on Ni foam prepared with a novel leaven dough method as an outstanding electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9797–9806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Separating hydrogen and oxygen evolution in alkaline water electrolysis using nickel hydroxide. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11741–11748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Du, P.; Eisenberg, R. Catalysts made of earth-abundant elements (Co, Ni, Fe) for water splitting: Recent progress and future challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6012–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Farid, S.; Ren, S.; Hao, C. MOF-derived metal/carbon materials as oxygen evolution reaction catalysts. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2018, 94, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, W.; Wu, L.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Liu, P.; Zhu, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Renner, J.N.; et al. Reaction mechanism for oxygen evolution on RuO2, IrO2, and RuO2@IrO2 core-shell nanocatalysts. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 819, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sung, M.; Kim, J. Oxygen evolution reaction on Pt sphere and Ir-modified Pt sphere electrodes with porous structures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 2130–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, D.; Chen, C.; Baiyee, Z.M.; Shao, Z.; Ciucci, F. Nonstoichiometric oxides as low-cost and highly-efficient oxygen reduction/evolution catalysts for low-temperature electrochemical devices. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9869–9921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gong, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Liang, Y.; Wu, J.Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Wei, F.; Dai, H. An advanced Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8452–8455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, P.F.; Yang, S.; Zheng, L.R.; Zhang, B.; Yang, H.G. Electrochemical etching of α-cobalt hydroxide for improvement of oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9578–9584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, J.; Kim, J.S.; Baik, H.; Kang, K.; Lee, K. Porous β-MnO2 nanoplates derived from MnCO3 nanoplates as highly efficient electrocatalysts toward oxygen evolution reaction. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 26535–26539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kanan, M.W.; Nocera, D.G. In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+. Science 2008, 321, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bediako, D.K.; Lassalle-Kaiser, B.; Surendranath, Y.; Yano, J.; Yachandra, V.K.; Nocera, D.G. Structure-activity correlations in a nickel-borate oxygen evolution catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6801–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, X.X.; Li, T.T.; Zheng, Y.Q. Co3O4 nanosheet arrays treated by defect engineering for enhanced electrocatalytic water oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 2009–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xie, T.; Min, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Fu, D.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, K.; Lei, M. Synthesis of mesoporous Co3O4 nanosheet-assembled hollow spheres towards efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 754, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, X.; Xia, Z.; Tian, Z.; Ma, Y.; Qu, Y. Ultrathin porous Co3O4 nanoplates as highly efficient oxygen evolution catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8107–8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, C. Enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution of α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets on carbon nanotube/polyimide films. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9667–9675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cui, C.; Wang, J.; Luo, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Li, Z. MOF-mediated synthesis of monodisperse Co(OH)2 flower-like nanosheets for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 273, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burke, M.S.; Kast, M.G.; Trotochaud, L.; Smith, A.M.; Boettcher, S.W. Cobalt-iron (oxy)hydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts: The role of structure and composition on activity, stability, and mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3638–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, X.; Zhao, C. Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional nickel-iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6616–6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ruan, J.; Zhao, W.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Zheng, X.; Ye, Q.; Xu, X.; Wang, F. New insights into graphite paper as electrocatalytic substrate for oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1146–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, S.K.; Dhavale, V.M.; Kurungot, S. Surface-tuned Co3O4 nanoparticles dispersed on nitrogen-doped graphene as an efficient cathode electrocatalyst for mechanical rechargeable zinc-Air battery application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21138–21149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lu, X.; Zhao, C. Highly efficient and robust oxygen evolution catalysts achieved by anchoring nanocrystalline cobalt oxides onto mildly oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 12053–12059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leng, X.; Zeng, Q.C.; Wu, K.H.; Gentlea, I.R.; Wang, D.W. Reduction-induced surface amorphization enhances the oxygen evolution activity in Co3O4. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27823–27828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Li, K.; Li, L.; Wei, J.; Feng, L.; Fu, Q. Morphology-controlled fabrication of Co3O4 nanostructures and their comparative catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, J.; Fang, C.; Zou, J.; Lu, H.; Tian, C.; Han, C.; Zhao, D. In situ ultrasonic formation of AgBr/Ag2CO3 nanosheets composite with enhanced visible-driven photocatalytic performance. Mater. Lett. 2016, 170, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Fang, D.; Xu, J.; Liang, J.; Zhou, L. Microwave-ultrasound assisted synthesis of β-FeOOH and its catalytic property in a photo-Fenton-like process. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 27, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Khan, N.A.; Jhung, S.H. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with microwave or ultrasound: Rapid reaction, phase-selectivity, and size reduction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 285, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 11 01912 g001 550
Figure 1. Fabrication of Co(OH)2/C, ultra-Co(OH)2/C and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the catalysts.
Figure 1. Fabrication of Co(OH)2/C, ultra-Co(OH)2/C and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the catalysts.
Materials 11 01912 g001
Materials 11 01912 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns of the (a) Co(OH)2/C and (b) ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalysts.
Figure 2. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns of the (a) Co(OH)2/C and (b) ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalysts.
Materials 11 01912 g002
Materials 11 01912 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Linear sweep voltammetry curves and (b) Tafel plots of ultra-Co(OH)2/C, Co(OH)2/C, and RuO2 catalysts in 0.1 M KOH.
Figure 3. (a) Linear sweep voltammetry curves and (b) Tafel plots of ultra-Co(OH)2/C, Co(OH)2/C, and RuO2 catalysts in 0.1 M KOH.
Materials 11 01912 g003
Materials 11 01912 g004 550
Figure 4. Chronopotentiometry curves of ultra-Co(OH)2/C and Co(OH)2/C catalysts at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 0.1 M KOH, and SEM images after catalyzing OER for 5 h.
Figure 4. Chronopotentiometry curves of ultra-Co(OH)2/C and Co(OH)2/C catalysts at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 0.1 M KOH, and SEM images after catalyzing OER for 5 h.
Materials 11 01912 g004
Materials 11 01912 g005 550
Figure 5. Electrochemical impedance spectra of Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalysts, (a) Nyquist curves; (b) Bode plots of Z versus frequency; (c) Bode plots of phase angle versus frequency; and (d) equivalent circuit model.
Figure 5. Electrochemical impedance spectra of Co(OH)2/C and ultra-Co(OH)2/C catalysts, (a) Nyquist curves; (b) Bode plots of Z versus frequency; (c) Bode plots of phase angle versus frequency; and (d) equivalent circuit model.
Materials 11 01912 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Si, Y.; Guo, C.; Xie, C.; Xiong, Z. An Ultrasonication-Assisted Cobalt Hydroxide Composite with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity toward Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Materials 2018, 11, 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101912

AMA Style

Si Y, Guo C, Xie C, Xiong Z. An Ultrasonication-Assisted Cobalt Hydroxide Composite with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity toward Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Materials. 2018; 11(10):1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Si, Yujun, Chaozhong Guo, Chenglong Xie, and Zhongping Xiong. 2018. "An Ultrasonication-Assisted Cobalt Hydroxide Composite with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity toward Oxygen Evolution Reaction" Materials 11, no. 10: 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop