Next Article in Journal
Surface Modification of Li(Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2)O2 Cathode Materials by Nano-Al2O3 to Improve Electrochemical Performance in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Structure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Cu-Fe-X Alloys with Excellent Thermal Stability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Analysis on the Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloys

1
Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(11), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111271
Submission received: 20 September 2017 / Revised: 30 October 2017 / Accepted: 31 October 2017 / Published: 6 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Materials Characterization)

Abstract

:
Knowledge of statistical characteristics of mechanical properties is very important for the practical application of structural materials. Unfortunately, the scatter characteristics of magnesium alloys for mechanical performance remain poorly understood until now. In this study, the mechanical reliability of magnesium alloys is systematically estimated using Weibull statistical analysis. Interestingly, the Weibull modulus, m, of strength for magnesium alloys is as high as that for aluminum and steels, confirming the very high reliability of magnesium alloys. The high predictability in the tensile strength of magnesium alloys represents the capability of preventing catastrophic premature failure during service, which is essential for safety and reliability assessment.

1. Introduction

Magnesium alloys are well known for their lightweight, high specific strength, high recycling ability, and excellent damping capacity [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, the use of magnesium alloys has been significantly increasing worldwide over the past years. Unfortunately, the macroscopic brittle fracture of most magnesium alloys, through cleavage and quasi-cleavage fracture modes [5], may raise a concern regarding the stability of characteristic strength, as extensively revealed in Mg-based glassy alloys [6]. Such a deleteriously flawed sensitivity behavior of magnesium alloys potentially presents a severe problem for their application, which has unfortunately received no attention to date.
There are many approaches to quantify the effect of statistically distributed flaws or defects on the mechanical properties of a brittle material. Among these approaches, Weibull statistical analysis has been widely used to describe the reproducibility of fracture strength [7]. For example, numerous Weibull models have been historically applied to rationalize the strength scatter in many ceramics and brittle metals [8,9]. Nevertheless, extremely rare data are available on the Weibull statistical distribution of strength for magnesium alloys. In this work, we employ Weibull statistical analysis to evaluate the strength reliability of magnesium alloys; the statistical distribution of strength is found to be highly correlated with the material’s specific microstructural state or feature. Our finding provides insight into understanding and stabilizing magnesium alloys by tailoring processing protocols.

2. Experimental section

Mg-6Zn-1Mn (ZM61) was prepared by vacuum induction melting under an Ar atmosphere using commercial high purity Mg (99.9%), Zn (99.9%) and Mg-4%Mn master alloys (ZG-0.01, Jinzhou, China). The alloy rods (80 mm in diameter and 250 mm in height) were machined and homogenized at 330 °C for 24 h. Then, they were immediately inserted into the extrusion chamber (350 °C) and extruded to bars with a diameter of 16 mm under an extrusion ratio of 25. Subsequently, the extruded bars were solution treated at 420 °C for 2 h followed by water quenching and then artificially aged at 180 °C for 16 h. The detailed processing of the extruded and aged ZM61 magnesium alloys can be seen elsewhere [10]. The microstructure of the extruded and aged alloys was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, TESCAN VEGA 3 LMH, Brno, Czech Republic) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, ZEISS LIBRA 200FE, Heidenheim, Germany), respectively. The uniaxial tensile characteristics of dogbone-like specimens (50 mm in gauge length and 5 mm in gauge diameter) were determined on a universal testing machine with a strain rate of 2 mm/min. The fracture morphologies were also examined with an SEM (JEOL JSM-7800F, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

Twenty samples were tested for each alloy, and all the stress-strain curves are shown in Figure 1a,b for extruded and aged ZM61 magnesium alloys, respectively. The apparent strength for each experiment was surprisingly uniform, especially for the extruded alloys. The 0.2% offset yield strength (σy) for the extruded alloy ranged from 206 to 212 MPa, with a variation of only ±0.7% around its mean value. The ultimate tensile strength (σu) and fracture strength (σf) ranged from about 300 to 307 MPa and 280 to 291 MPa, with a variation of ±0.5% and ±1.3% around their corresponding mean values, respectively. The statistical result for the extruded alloys demonstrated a very narrow distribution range for the σy, σu and σf. For the aged alloys, the σy ranged from 307 to 320 MPa, with a variation of ±1.3% around its average value. The σu and σf ranged from about 345 to 355 MPa and 302 to 333 MPa, with a variation of ±0.9% and ±3% around their corresponding average values, respectively. Interestingly, the strength of all the magnesium alloys matched the statistical trend and displayed a narrow distribution, which was evidently very different from common brittle materials, the tensile strength of which is usually highly scattered [8].
Weibull statistics is a well-established characterization tool in the field of fracture strength of brittle materials. Weibull related the cumulative failure probability P f of volume V of a material under a uniaxial tensile stress σ using the following relationship [8]:
P f = 1 exp [ V ( σ σ u σ 0 ) m ]
where σ0 is a scaling parameter, m is the Weibull modulus and V is a normalized volume of the tested sample. The σu is the location parameter, denoting the stress at which there is a zero failure probability; it is usually taken as zero for the safest assumption [11]. For N nominally identical specimens ranked from the weakest (i = 1) to the strongest (i = N), the failure probability P f of the ith one is calculated using the following equation [12]:
P f , i = n i 0.5 N
where n i is the ith sample ( n i = 1, …, N experiments) and N is the total number of samples tested. These results were then plotted in the usual double logarithmic form of the Weibull expression. Therefore, the parameters of the Weibull distribution could be obtained by linearizing Equation (1).
ln [ ln ( 1 1 P f ) ] = ln V + m ln σ m ln σ 0
By fitting a straight line to ln [ ln ( 1 / 1 P f ) ] as a function of ln σ , the Weibull modulus m was simply the slope, and the scaling parameter σ0 could be determined from the intercept. The coefficient of determination R 2 has been commonly used as a measure of the goodness of fit. The higher the value of R 2 , the more likely the data are to follow the distribution being tested. Recently, Tiryakioglu et al. [13] ran Monte Carlo simulations to determine the critical points of R 2 and proposed that the following formula can be used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit tests for sample sizes between 5 and 100:
R 0.05 2 = 1.0637 0.4174 n 0.3
If the calculated R 2 is higher than R 0.05 2 , then it can be concluded that the data indeed came from a Weibull distribution. The Weibull fit was acceptable. On the contrary, the two-parameter Weibull analysis was not valid if R 2 < R 0.05 2 .
Figure 2 shows the Weibull plots in the form suggested by Equation (3) for the extruded (a) and aged (b) magnesium alloys. From Figure 2a, a very good linear relationship of the σy, σu and σf was observed. The coefficients of determination, R2, for the σy, σu and σf were 0.925, 0.951 and 0.901, respectively, which were all higher than the value of R 0.05 2 (0.894), suggesting that the experimental data could be reasonably described by the Weibull distribution equation. Linear least squares fitting of Equation (3) was performed for these data given the Weibull modulus m of the σy, σu and σf as 166.3, 261.4 and 92.6 for the extruded alloys, respectively. Surprisingly, the failure Weibull modulus m, which ranged from 90 to 100, was as high as the ductile aluminum and steel [8]. Since the m value reflected the degree of variation in the strength of the samples tested, a higher m value implied a narrower distribution of fracture stresses and a higher reliability. Typical values of the Weibull modulus m for some materials including Mg-based bulk metallic glasses [14] were summarized and are listed in Table 1. Although magnesium alloys are often regarded as macroscopically brittle materials, it was interesting to observe a very high reliability from the rather uniform strength data and large Weibull modulus. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 2b, the Weibull plots of the σy, σu and σf for the aged alloys displayed a relatively poor linear relationship, especially for σf. The coefficients of determination, R2, from the linear least squares fitting method were 0.838, 0.883, 0.677 for the σy, σu and σf, respectively. The R 2 was much lower than the value of R 0.05 2 (0.894), implying that the experimental data for aged alloys were not acceptable based on the two-parameter Weibull distribution [15]. We also noticed significant deviation of some points from the fitting line at high values of ln(σf). This was very different from the previous report where the assumption of the threshold was zero, which was no longer appropriate for the two-parameter distribution. This is still an open question and implies that the Weibull analysis may be upgraded to a three-parameter version for fitting. When considering the location parameter σu, the three-parameter Weibull model has also been suggested as a more interpretable and accurate reliability assessment [16].
The tensile failure strength σf was very sensitive to interior flaws and cracks. For the extruded magnesium alloys, flaws such as shrinkage porosity, oxidation slags and cracks in the as-cast stage were basically eliminated during the hot extrusion [17]. Figure 3a shows the backscattered electron imaging in the SEM of the extruded alloy; after a complete solid solution heat treatment, only a few of the α-Mn phases were precipitated for the extruded alloy, which could be further confirmed by the bright field mode of the TEM as shown in the inset. Due to the small amount of precipitation with sparse distribution, it has little effect on the variation of mechanical properties. After the hot extrusion process, the microstructure of the alloy shows a relatively uniform and fine structure. Therefore, a uniform failure strength and large Weibull moduli m were attained. However, for the aged alloy as shown in Figure 3b, a large amount of precipitation with different morphologies, including rod MgZn2 Laves phase (β’1) and plate MgZn2 Laves phase (β’2), was observed. It has been demonstrated that the main strengthening phase in the current Mg alloy was the β’1 phase [18]. However, the very different diameter rod from ~12 nm to ~75 nm of the β’1 phase may be one of the negative influences on the variation of mechanical strength. In addition, the coarsening of precipitated phases was observed after ageing, which may increase the tendency of stress concentration on the grain boundaries and phase boundaries. This could possibly increase the probability of initiation and propagation of crack and flaws [19,20] and result in a relatively variable failure strength.
These flaws could be further interpreted by the fracture morphologies of the extruded (a) and aged (b) magnesium alloys as shown in Figure 4, which displayed ductile tearing fracture characteristics and typical cleavage fracture features, respectively. The embedded Mn-rich particles in the dimples appeared on the fracture surface as shown in the inset, implying that the extruded alloy did not have any macro-inclusions. In contrast, EDS analysis of the inclusion-initiated fracture in the aged alloy with the lowest σf revealed some impurities, such as Fe and Si. It was noted that such defects were usually located at or near the specimen surface, which likely yielded a highly severe stress concentration. These macro-inclusions were also responsible for the relatively large variation of the σf for aged Mg alloys. These findings are consistent with the notion that magnesium alloys are capable of large ductility which reduces their flaw sensitivity, as indicated by the strain-to-failure ε (%) that decreased from ~20% to ~10% for the extruded and aged magnesium alloys, respectively.
Furthermore, the varieties of mechanical properties for magnesium alloys may be involved in the solution treatment and artificial aging treatment. These flaws in magnesium alloys were generally micron sized. Therefore, the microhardness could be further explained by the degree of flaws in magnesium alloys under different processing conditions. In order to ensure the reliability of the statistical results, we measured twenty indentations on each sample in well-defined regular arrays, resulting in a total of four hundred raw data points for each alloy and fully reflecting the flaw distribution in extruded and aged magnesium alloys. The experimental data could also be reasonably described by the Weibull distribution equation as shown in Figure 5. It can be seen that the Weibull modulus m of microhardness for the extruded magnesium alloys was 33.7, which was much higher than that of the aged ones. This implied that the micro-flaws in extruded alloys had rather uniform sizes. Regardless of the flaw size, the narrow distribution in the measured microhardness was a result of a narrow distribution of the flaw size, large or small, further explaining why the extruded alloys had such a high uniformity, as indicated by the uniformity of the apparent yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and fracture strength values measured for a large number of extruded magnesium alloys.

4. Conclusions

By utilizing Weibull analysis, we found that both the extruded and aged MgZnMn alloys demonstrate strikingly high consistency in terms of tensile strength. Specifically, the extruded magnesium alloys have a very high reliability with a Weibull modulus m = 92.6 for fracture strength. Such a high Weibull modulus is comparable to many types of aluminum and steel. Compared to the extruded magnesium alloys, the aged alloys show a higher flaw sensitivity, which originates from the embrittlement effect by the distinct microstructural features whereby interconnected coarse Laves phase often precipitates within the alloy matrix. We therefore believe that these findings have very important implications for the safety and reliability assessment of magnesium alloys for lightweight applications.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51671162, 51531002 and 51474043), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XDJK2017B054 and XDJK2017D012), Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (No. cstc2015jcyjBX0107), and International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (No. 2015DFA51330).

Author contributions

Shengfeng Guo designed the study; Hongju Zhang performed the main experiments; Shengfeng Guo, Ruoyu Liu, Xianquan Jiang, Dingfei Zhang and Jingfeng Wang performed the data analysis; Shengfeng Guo wrote the paper with support from Fusheng Pan. All authors contributed to the general discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kainer, K.U. Magnesium—Alloys and Technologies; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo, A.A. Magnesium casting technology for structural applications. J. Magnes. Alloys 2013, 1, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, W.Q.; Birbilis, N.; Sha, G.; Wang, Y.; Daniels, J.E.; Xiao, Y.; Ferry, M. A high-specific-strength and corrosion-resistant magnesium alloy. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qin, D.Z.; Wang, J.F.; Chen, Y.L.; Lu, R.P.; Pan, F.S. Effect of long period stacking ordered structure on the damping capacities of Mg-Ni-Y alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 624, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, Y.Z.; Wang, Q.D.; Ding, W.J.; Zeng, X.Q.; Zhu, Y.P. Fracture behavior of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Mater. Lett. 2000, 44, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zberg, B.; Arata, E.R.; Uggowitzer, P.J.; Loffler, J. Tensile properties of glassy MgZnCa wires and reliability analysis using Weibull statistics. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 3223–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weibull, W. A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 1951, 18, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
  8. Meyers, M.A.; Chawla, K.K. Mechanical Behavior of Materials; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu, W.F.; Li, Y.; Schuh, C.A. Strength, plasticity and brittleness of bulk metallic glasses under compression: Statistical and geometric effects. Philos. Mag. 2008, 88, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, D.L.; Zhang, D.F.; Sun, J.; Luo, Y.X.; Xu, J.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Pan, F.S. High cycle fatigue behavior of extruded and double-aged Mg-6Zn-1Mn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 662, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sullivan, J.D.; Lauzon, P.H. Experimental probability estimators for Weibull plots. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1986, 5, 1245–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, J.H.; Wang, J.Q.; Lu, L.; Li, Y. High tensile strength reliability in a bulk metallic glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 041905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tiryakioğlu, M.; Hudak, D. Guidelines for Two-Parameter Weibull Analysis for Flaw-Containing Materials. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 1130–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, Y.Y.; Ma, E.; Xu, J. Reliability of compressive fracture strength of Mg-Zn-Ca bulk metallic glasses: Flaw sensitivity and Weibull statistics. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tiryakioğlu, M.; Hudak, D.; Okten, G. On evaluating Weibull fits to mechanical testing data. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 527, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, Z.; Tang, L.C.; Xu, J.; Li, Y. A three-parameter Weibull statistical analysis of the strength variation of bulk metallic glasses. Scr. Mater. 2009, 61, 923–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, F.S.; Yang, M.B.; Chen, X.H. A Review on Casting Magnesium Alloys: Modification of Commercial Alloys and Development of New Alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, D.F.; Shi, G.L.; Dai, Q.W.; Yuan, W.; Duan, H.L. Microstructures and mechanical properties of high strength Mg-Zn-Mn alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2008, 18, s59–s63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, F.M.D.; Panigrahi, S.K. Age hardening, fracture behavior and mechanical properties of QE22 Mg alloy. J. Magnes. Alloys 2015, 3, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang, L.Y.; Zhang, D.F.; Fan, X.W.; Guo, F.; Hu, G.S.; Xue, H.S.; Pan, F.S. Evaluating the morphology of precipitates and the room temperature mechanical properties of age hardened AZT802 magnesium alloy treated at different aging temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 644, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Tensile stress-strain curves of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Figure 1. Tensile stress-strain curves of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Materials 10 01271 g001
Figure 2. Weibull plot of tensile strength of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Figure 2. Weibull plot of tensile strength of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Materials 10 01271 g002
Figure 3. The SEM images and the bright-field TEM images of the microstructure for the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Figure 3. The SEM images and the bright-field TEM images of the microstructure for the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Materials 10 01271 g003
Figure 4. The fracture morphologies of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Figure 4. The fracture morphologies of the ZM61 magnesium alloys: (a) extruded and (b) aged.
Materials 10 01271 g004
Figure 5. Weibull plot of the microhardness of the extruded and aged ZM61 magnesium alloys.
Figure 5. Weibull plot of the microhardness of the extruded and aged ZM61 magnesium alloys.
Materials 10 01271 g005
Table 1. Typical values of the Weibull modulus m for some materials.
Table 1. Typical values of the Weibull modulus m for some materials.
MaterialmRef.
Traditional Ceramics:
Brick, Pottery, Chalk
<3[8]
Engineered Ceramics:
SiC, Al2O3, Si3N4
5–10[8]
Metals:
Aluminum, Steel90–100[8]
Extruded magnesium alloy92.6This work
Mg-based glassy alloy5–41[6,14]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, S.; Liu, R.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Pan, F. Statistical Analysis on the Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloys. Materials 2017, 10, 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111271

AMA Style

Guo S, Liu R, Jiang X, Zhang H, Zhang D, Wang J, Pan F. Statistical Analysis on the Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloys. Materials. 2017; 10(11):1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Shengfeng, Ruoyu Liu, Xianquan Jiang, Hongju Zhang, Dingfei Zhang, Jingfeng Wang, and Fusheng Pan. 2017. "Statistical Analysis on the Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloys" Materials 10, no. 11: 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop