Frontier Research and Application Advances in Energy-Saving Technologies for Aluminum Electrolysis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Electrolyzer Structure Optimization
2.1. Anode Structure and Material Optimization
2.2. Cathode Structure and Material Optimization
2.3. Optimization of Anode Conductive Devices
3. Improvements in Electrolysis Technology
3.1. Electrolyte Formulation Optimization
3.2. Optimization of Electrolysis Process Control
4. Exploration of Energy Utilization Systems
4.1. Flexible Power Supply Adaptation
4.2. Waste Heat Recovery Technology
5. Summary and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dardor, D.; Flórez-Orrego, D.; Germanier, R.; Margni, M.; Maréchal, F. Decarbonizing the aluminium industry: A comprehensive review of pathways and process integration perspectives. Energy Strategy Rev. 2025, 61, 101853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullen, J.M.; Allwood, J.M. Mapping the Global Flow of Aluminum: From Liquid Aluminum to End-Use Goods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3057–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Lin, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, A.; Shi, Z.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Wang, G.; Liu, F. Research on Aluminum Electrolysis from 1970 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis. JOM 2024, 76, 3265–3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes-Bozo, L.; Fúnez-Guerra, C.; Luis Salazar, J.; Vyhmeister, E.; Valdés-González, H.; Jaén Caparrós, M.; Clemente-Jul, C.; Carro-De Lorenzo, F.; De Simón-Martín, M. Green hydrogen integration in aluminum recycling: Techno-economic analysis towards sustainability transition in the expanding aluminum market. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2024, 22, 100548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haarberg, G.M. Electrowinning of Aluminum—Challenges and Possibilities for Reducing the Carbon Footprint. Electrochemistry 2024, 92, 043002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Peng, J.; Di, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, K. Upcycling of scrap aluminum to pure aluminum through molten salt electrolysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 191, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcgeer, J.P. Hall-Heroult: 100 Years of Processes Evolution. JOM 1986, 38, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Basu, B. Sustainable Primary Aluminium Production: Technology Status and Future Opportunities. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2019, 72, 2135–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dokl, M.; Strajnar, G.; Vujanović, A.; Puhar, J.; Kravanja, Z.; Čuček, L. Environmental impact assessment of organic Rankine cycle using waste heat from the aluminium industry. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2025, 27, 101022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowicki, C.; Gosselin, L. An Overview of Opportunities for Waste Heat Recovery and Thermal Integration in the Primary Aluminum Industry. JOM 2012, 64, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brough, D.; Jouhara, H. The aluminium industry: A review on state-of-the-art technologies, environmental impacts and possibilities for waste heat recovery. Int. J. Thermofluids 2020, 1, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Müller, D.B. Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: A critical review of life cycle assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 35, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flórez-Orrego, D.; Dardor, D.; Germanier, R.; Margni, M.; Maréchal, F. A systemic study for decarbonizing secondary aluminium production via waste heat recovery, carbon management and renewable energy integration. Energy Convers. Manag. 2025, 341, 120021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dardor, D.; Flórez-Orrego, D.; Domingos, M.E.R.; Germanier, R.; Margni, M.; Maréchal, F. Towards carbon-negative primary aluminium production: Integrating biomass resources and renewable electricity. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 534, 146994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, Y.V.; Boronko, E.A. Analysis of Energy Sustainability and Problems of Technological Process of Primary Aluminum Production. Energies 2025, 18, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Ebe, F.; Morris, J.; Lorenz, H.; Kondzialka, C.; Heilscher, G. Implementation and Test of an IEC 61850-Based Automation Framework for the Automated Data Model Integration of DES (ADMID) into DSO SCADA. Energies 2022, 15, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musii, R.; Lis, M.; Pukach, P.; Chaban, A.; Szafraniec, A.; Vovk, M.; Melnyk, N. Analysis of Varying Temperature Regimes in a Conductive Strip during Induction Heating under a Quasi-Steady Electromagnetic Field. Energies 2024, 17, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, R. Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch Method for Integrated Energy in Aluminum Electrolysis Considering Production Safety Constraints. Processes 2025, 13, 3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Chen, B.; Xie, H.; Ye, X.; Bai, J. Participation of electrolytic aluminum loads in grid interaction control strategies considering process flow and regulation costs. Front. Energy Res. 2025, 12, 1493558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, N.; Liu, Y.; Xin, H.; Sun, H.; Zhang, R. Exploring the paths of energy conservation and emission reduction in aluminum industry in Henan province, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 467, 142997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.; Yu, X.; Li, D.; Lei, T.; Hao, Q.; Guan, D. Different technology packages for aluminium smelters worldwide to deliver the 1.5 °C target. Nature Climate Change 2025, 15, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudreau, P.; Johnson, M.; Bergthorson, J.M. Techno-economic assessment of aluminum as a clean energy carrier to decarbonize remote industries. Energy Adv. 2024, 3, 1919–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eskin, D.G. Conversion of Aluminum to Hydrogen: A Metallurgical Point of View. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 26, 2401125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sgouridis, S.; Ali, M.; Sleptchenko, A.; Bouabid, A.; Ospina, G. Aluminum smelters in the energy transition: Optimal configuration and operation for renewable energy integration in high insolation regions. Renew. Energy 2021, 180, 937–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Zhou, K.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, H.-W.; Zhang, L. Recent progress of inert anodes for carbon-free aluminium electrolysis: A review and outlook. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 25272–25285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Einarsrud, K.E.; Eick, I.; Bai, W.; Feng, Y.; Hua, J.; Witt, P.J. Towards a coupled multi-scale, multi-physics simulation framework for aluminium electrolysis. Appl. Math. Model. 2017, 44, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Zhang, W.; Liu, D.; Cen, J.; Xiong, J.; Luo, G. Multi-Objective Optimization of Cell Voltage Based on a Comprehensive Index Evaluation Model in the Aluminum Electrolysis Process. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zhou, D.; Zhao, Z. Progress in Application of Energy-Saving Measures in Aluminum Reduction Cells. JOM 2019, 71, 2420–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammad, I.; Kelley, D.H. Stabilizing a Low-Dimensional Model of Magnetohydrodynamic Instabilities in Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. In Light Metals 2022; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, G.; Ding, Y.; Bai, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, J.; Chen, C. AlF3-Modified Carbon Anodes for Aluminum Electrolysis: Oxidation Resistance and Microstructural Evolution. Inorganics 2025, 13, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkhipov, A.; Ahli, N.; Necheporenko, I.; Mukhanov, A.; Potocnik, V. Review of Thermal and Electrical Modelling and Validation Approaches for Anode Design in Aluminium Reduction Cells. In Proceedings of the 36th International ICSOBA Conference 2023, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 6–9 November 2023; Volume 589. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Q.; Xiao, J.; Du, H.; Yao, Z. Thiophenic Sulfur Transformation in a Carbon Anode during the Aluminum Electrolysis Process. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 4539–4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, F.; Xu, G.; Wang, A.; Chen, C. Optimized fabrication and enhanced performance of low-porosity carbon anodes for aluminum electrolysis. Carbon Lett. 2025, 35, 2111–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, W.; Li, M.; Liu, L.; Li, H. A new approach for improving the quality of the carbon anode for aluminum electrolysis—An impregnation-baking process. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 96, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Li, B.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.; Peng, J.; Wang, Y.; Cheung, S.C.P. Effect of Slotted Anode on Gas Bubble Behaviors in Aluminum Reduction Cell. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 3161–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishurov, A.V.; Bezrukikh, A.I.; Puzanov, I.I.; Zavadyak, A.V.; Evstratko, V.V.; Volkov, N.A.; Konovalenko, A.I.; Konstantinov, I.L.; Voroshilov, D.S.; Baykovskiy, Y.V. Quality diagnostics of the baked anodes for aluminum electrolytic cells by non-destructive control method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 130, 437–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blais, M.; Désilets, M.; Lacroix, M. Optimization of the cathode block shape of an aluminum electrolysis cell. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 58, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padamata, S.K.; Singh, K.; Haarberg, G.M.; Saevarsdottir, G. Wettable TiB2 Cathode for Aluminum Electrolysis: A Review. J. Sustain. Metall. 2022, 8, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Song, Y.; Di, Y.; Wang, Y.; Feng, N. Increasing the Energy Efficiency of Aluminum-Reduction Cells Using Modified Cathodes. JOM 2017, 69, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, W.; Li, T.; Wang, Z.; Gao, B.; Shi, Z.; Hu, X.; Cui, J. Impact of the Usage of a Slotted Cathode Carbon Block on Thermoelectric Field in an Aluminum Reduction Cell. JOM 2015, 67, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.-H.; Wang, H.-Q.; Li, Q.-Y. Preparation of wettable TiB2-TiB/Ti cathode by electrolytic boronizing for aluminum electrolytic. J. Cent. South Univ. 2019, 26, 2681–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, W. Effect of TiC on TiB2-carbon inert cathodes for aluminum electrolysis. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 125, 108987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Li, S.-X.; Chen, D.-L.; Liu, X.-L.; Ma, C.-D.; Li, X.-B. Evaluation of cathode quality and damage of aluminium electrolytic cell based on non-destructive technology. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2021, 31, 3929–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ma, H.; Shen, Z. Research on explosive welding of aluminum alloy to steel with dovetail grooves. Mater. Des. 2015, 87, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Mao, H.; Liu, C.; Liu, M. The Control System of Friction Welding Machine for 5000 kN Large Electrolytic Aluminum Prebaked Anode Conductor. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1748, 052016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Feng, B.; Chen, Z.; Liang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liang, X. Simulation and Application of a New Type of Energy-Saving Steel Claw for Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Sustainbility 2024, 16, 8061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Hu, X.; Zhao, J.; Chen, C.; He, G.; Zhang, L. The study of thermal-electrical coupling numerical simulation of aluminum electrolytic cell anode assembly and parameter optimization of steel claws. Results Eng. 2025, 26, 104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasegaram, D.R.; Molenaar, D. Towards improved energy efficiency in the electrical connections of Hall–Héroult cells through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 93, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obaidat, M.; Al-Ghandoor, A.; Phelan, P.; Villalobos, R.; Alkhalidi, A. Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Aluminum Reduction Technologies. Sustainbility 2018, 10, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Xie, P.; Hao, W.; Lu, D.; Qi, Y.; Mi, Y. Ionic liquids as electrolytes in aluminum electrolysis. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1014893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Peng, J.; Wang, Y.; Di, Y. Study on Liquidus Temperature of NaF-KF-LiF-AlF3 System with Low Cryolite Ratio. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzdaltsev, A.V.; Nikolaev, A.Y.; Zaikov, Y.P. Towards the Stability of Low-Temperature Aluminum Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 046521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubiňáková, E.; Danielik, V.; Híveš, J. Electrochemical characterization of multicomponent sodium cryolite electrolytes with high content of aluminium fluoride. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Wang, J.; Mou, C.; Wu, S.; Zong, C. Study on micro-structure and transport properties of KF-NaF-AlF3-Al2O3 system by first-principles molecular dynamics simulation. J. Fluor. Chem. 2020, 235, 109546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantin, V. Influence of the operating parameters over the current efficiency and corrosion rate in the Hall–Heroult aluminum cell with tin oxide anode substrate material. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, L.; Xue, J.; Ndong, G.K.; Li, X.; Lang, G.; Lin, R.; Li, W.; Xu, X. Effects of Current Density and Temperature on Anode Carbon Consumption in Aluminum Electrolysis. Light Metals 2015, 2015, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Z. Study on the Inter-Electrode Process of Aluminum Electrolysis (II)—Digital Analysis of the Anode Gas Distribution Patterns on the Anode Surface Using A See-Through Cell. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, L.; He, T.; Luo, H. Piggybacking on past problem for faster optimization in aluminum electrolysis process design. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 126, 106937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Shi, J.; Yin, G.; He, W.; Yi, J. Optimal Control for Aluminum Electrolysis Process Using Adaptive Dynamic Programming. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 220374–220383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Yao, Y.; Bao, J.; Skyllas-Kazacos, M.; Welch, B.J.; Jassim, A.; Mahmoud, M. Advanced Model-Based Estimation and Control of Alumina Concentration in an Aluminum Reduction Cell. JOM 2022, 74, 706–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, T.-A. A comprehensive review of aluminium electrolysis and the waste generated by it. Waste Manag. Res. 2023, 41, 1498–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G.; Han, R. Low-Carbon Economic Collaborative Scheduling Strategy for Aluminum Electrolysis Loads with a High Proportion of Renewable Energy Integration. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Q.; Xu, J.; Liao, S.; Liu, H. Adaptive load control of electrolytic aluminum for power system frequency regulation based on the aluminum production operation state. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Liu, W.; He, B.; Cao, Z.; Liu, G.; Chuan, B.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, Y. Multi-Objective Optimization Strategy for Integrated Energy System Considering Mixed Participation of Aluminum Electrolysis and Hydrogen Production Industries. Energies 2025, 18, 6109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ran, L.; Li, J.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, B.; Li, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhang, H. Fully-Coupled Electric-Thermal-Flow Modeling and Investigation of Dynamic Thermal-Ledge Behavior in Aluminum Electrolysis Cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024, 171, 093507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Ran, L.; He, G.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. Analysis and Countermeasures of Wind Power Accommodation by Aluminum Electrolysis Pot-Lines in China. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 2526–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Yang, C.; Cheng, J.; Duan, Z.; Wei, Z.; Li, L.; He, Z.; Zhou, X. Review on Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Shanxi Metall. 2024, 47, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Liang, G.; Guan, Y. Industrial Experimental Study on Efficient Recovery Technology of Waste Heat from the Side of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Nonferrous Met. Eng. 2023, 13, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakhrai, S.G.; Kondrat’ev, V.V.; Belyanin, A.V.; Nikolaev, V.N.; Gron, V.A. Cooling of the Anode Gases of Aluminum Reduction Cells in Alumina-Heating Heat Exchangers. Metallurgist 2015, 59, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ming, Y.; Zhou, N. Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Waste Heat Power Generation System (WHPGS) Applied to the Sidewalls of Aluminum Reduction Cells. Entropy 2020, 22, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barzi, Y.M.; Assadi, M.; Parham, K. A waste heat recovery system development and analysis using ORC for the energy efficiency improvement in aluminium electrolysis cells. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 1511–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Tao, W.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Z. A Numerical Approach on Waste Heat Recovery through Sidewall Heat-Exchanging in an Aluminum Electrolysis Cell. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 3573306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cascella, F.; Gaboury, S.; Sorin, M.; Teyssedou, A. Proof of concept to recover thermal wastes from aluminum electrolysis cells using Stirling engines. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 172, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Category | Sub-Category | Core Optimization Measures | Key Performance Improvement Data | Literature Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Electrolyzer Structure Optimization | 1.1 Anode Structure and Material Optimization | Focus on raw material quality and sulfur species transformation to guide anode desulfurization and material optimization | COS identified as the main sulfur product, contributing to increased carbon consumption and anode degradation. | Zhong et al. [32] |
| B2O3 and asphalt additives introduced to optimize anode forming and sintering, improving pore structure | Lower porosity, higher density, improved electrical and oxidation resistance | Bai et al. [33] | ||
| Integrated anode impregnation-calcination process with optimized pitch mass transfer and calcination parameters | Compressive strength +9.43 MPa; gas permeability −0.54 nPm | Hou et al. [34] | ||
| Slotted anode design for enhanced bubble release | Bubble removal efficiency 36→63%; bubble layer −3.5 mm | Sun et al. [35] | ||
| Non-destructive inspection via resistance and magnetic field mapping | Defect detection accuracy 82%; 13.5% hidden defective anodes identified | Mishurov et al. [36] | ||
| 1.2 Cathode Structure and Material Optimization | 5° inclined cathode with raised collector bar | Electrolyzer voltage −200 mV | Peng et al. [39] | |
| Slotted cathode configuration | Maximum horizontal current density −50.4% | Tao et al. [40] | ||
| TiB2-TiB/Ti gradient composite cathode | Improved sodium penetration and corrosion resistance | Huang et al. [41] | ||
| TiB2-C composite cathode with TiC catalysis | Voltage drop −120 mV; reduced metal flow instability | Wang et al. [42] | ||
| Ultrasonic wave velocity and impact-echo testing for cathode carbon blocks and steel rods | Quality selection via wave velocity-voltage drop criteria; three damage types identified in situ | Luo et al. [43] | ||
| 1.3 Optimization of Anode Conductive Devices | Explosive welding of aluminum-steel composite conductors | Enhanced stability of anode guide rod | Li et al. [44] | |
| Large-scale friction welding process control | Anode conductor voltage −8 mV | Feng et al. [45] | ||
| 15° inclined current-equalizing steel claw | Energy saving 114.1 kWh/t Al; voltage −36 mV | Han et al. [46] | ||
| Optimized steel-claw geometry parameters | Voltage drop −34.3 mV | Zhang et al. [47] | ||
| 2. Improvements in Electrolysis Technology | 2.1 Electrolyte Formulation Optimization | NaF-KF-LiF-AlF3 electrolyte system | Lower liquidus temperature | Chen et al. [51] |
| KF-NaF-AlF3-Al2O3 electrolyte system | Optimal current density 0.4–0.55 A·cm−2 at 750–800 °C | Suzdaltsev et al. [52] | ||
| LiF addition in multicomponent cryolite melt | Conductivity +1.88% (1 wt% LiF) | Kubiňáková et al. [53] | ||
| First-principles MD simulations of KF-NaF-AlF3-Al2O3 melt at CR = 1.3 and 877 °C. | Dominant species: [AlF4]−, [AlF5]2−, [AlF6]3−; diffusivity order: Na > K > F > O > Al; σ = −0.07543c + 1.734; η = 0.17914c + 1.118 | Guo et al. [54] | ||
| 2.2 Optimization of Electrolysis Process Control | ARMA-FNN-based multi-objective control | State classification accuracy 96.78% | Xu et al. [27] | |
| PPPFO + NSGA-II optimization framework | Improved IGD and HV performance | Yao et al. [58] | ||
| Adaptive dynamic programming control | Fast convergence to 945 °C and 3645 mV | Zhou et al. [59] | ||
| EKF-LQR control for alumina feeding | Alumina SD 0.127→0.022 wt%; PFC reduction | Shi et al. [60] | ||
| 3. Exploration of Energy Utilization Systems | 3.1 Flexible Power Supply Adaptation | Electro-thermal-fluid coupled modeling | Prediction errors: metal-layer velocity <5.7%, crust thickness <8.82%, crust temperature difference <5% | Ran et al. [65] |
| Wind-electrolysis integrated operation | Wind power absorption 57.84 million kWh | Zhang et al. [66] | ||
| 3.2 Waste Heat Recovery Technology | Anode gas-alumina heat exchanger | Energy saving 135–170 kWh/t Al | Shakhrai et al. [69] | |
| ORC waste heat power generation | Single-cell power 18.27 kW; efficiency 9.15% | Barzi et al. [71] | ||
| Heat pipe + ORC combined system | Sidewall heat recovery ~80% | Yang et al. [72] | ||
| LTD Stirling engine recovery | Stable power density 14.3 W·m−2 | Cascella et al. [73] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhou, Y.; Zhao, C.; Xiao, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M.; Huang, S.; Yang, J.; Mao, Q.; You, Z.; Zhong, Q. Frontier Research and Application Advances in Energy-Saving Technologies for Aluminum Electrolysis. Energies 2026, 19, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040959
Zhou Y, Zhao C, Xiao J, Zhou L, Wang M, Huang S, Yang J, Mao Q, You Z, Zhong Q. Frontier Research and Application Advances in Energy-Saving Technologies for Aluminum Electrolysis. Energies. 2026; 19(4):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040959
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhou, Yu, Chaoxian Zhao, Jin Xiao, Liuzhou Zhou, Minxu Wang, Sen Huang, Jiyuan Yang, Qiuyun Mao, Zihan You, and Qifan Zhong. 2026. "Frontier Research and Application Advances in Energy-Saving Technologies for Aluminum Electrolysis" Energies 19, no. 4: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040959
APA StyleZhou, Y., Zhao, C., Xiao, J., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Huang, S., Yang, J., Mao, Q., You, Z., & Zhong, Q. (2026). Frontier Research and Application Advances in Energy-Saving Technologies for Aluminum Electrolysis. Energies, 19(4), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040959

