This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Thermoeconomic and Environmental Impact Analysis of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant
by
Ali Şimşek
Ali Şimşek 1 and
Aysegul Gungor Celik
Aysegul Gungor Celik 2,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa 45400, Turkey
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hasan Ferdi Turgutlu Technology Faculty, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa 45400, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(3), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030611 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 December 2025
/
Revised: 21 January 2026
/
Accepted: 22 January 2026
/
Published: 24 January 2026
Abstract
Geothermal energy is recognized as one of the most reliable and environmentally sustainable energy sources. This study presents a comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and exergoenvironmental assessment of the Mis I binary geothermal power plant (GPP) operating with a low-temperature geothermal resource. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing a four-dimensional (4-E) assessment—energy, exergy, economic, and exergoenvironmental—of the Mis I binary geothermal power plant (GPP). Unlike conventional studies that focus on theoretical models, this research utilizes real-time operational data to identify potential improvements at the component level by evaluating exergy-based environmental sustainability and economic performance. The energy efficiency of the n-pentane Rankine cycle was calculated as 39.76%, indicating that a substantial portion of the geothermal heat is rejected as waste. The exergy input to the plant was determined to be 18,580.29 kW, while the net electrical power output was 8990 kW, resulting in an overall exergy efficiency of 48.38%. These results highlight the clear disparity between energy and exergy efficiencies and underline the importance of exergy-based performance evaluation for low-temperature geothermal power systems. Component-level exergy balance analyses were conducted using real operating data, revealing that the cooling towers are the dominant sources of exergy destruction, whereas the turbine units exhibit comparatively high thermodynamic effectiveness. Improvement potential analysis identified cooling towers I–II, evaporator II, and preheater I as key components requiring further optimization. Economic evaluation showed that approximately 64% of the total investment cost is associated with turbine units, with a total plant cost of about USD 6.7 million. The levelized cost of electricity was calculated as 0.0136 USD/kWh, and the payback period was approximately 1.5 years. Exergoenvironmental results indicate that the Mis I GPP achieves the highest sustainability index (1.94) among comparable plants, confirming its superior thermodynamic, economic, and environmental performance.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Şimşek, A.; Gungor Celik, A.
Thermoeconomic and Environmental Impact Analysis of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant. Energies 2026, 19, 611.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030611
AMA Style
Şimşek A, Gungor Celik A.
Thermoeconomic and Environmental Impact Analysis of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant. Energies. 2026; 19(3):611.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030611
Chicago/Turabian Style
Şimşek, Ali, and Aysegul Gungor Celik.
2026. "Thermoeconomic and Environmental Impact Analysis of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant" Energies 19, no. 3: 611.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030611
APA Style
Şimşek, A., & Gungor Celik, A.
(2026). Thermoeconomic and Environmental Impact Analysis of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant. Energies, 19(3), 611.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030611
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.