Next Article in Journal
When Distributed Energy Becomes Governable: A Perspective on Coordination and Aggregation in Energy Transitions
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Transition in Poland in the Context of EU Climate Policy: An Analysis of the Energy–Economy–CO2 Emissions Nexus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Trends and Future Scenarios in Afghanistan: Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Renewable Energy Potential, and Sustainable Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Crude Oil Prices Forecasting in the Energy Transition Era: Evidence from Geopolitical and Technological Drivers

1
Economics Department, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
2
Faculty of Economics, University of Tipaza, Tipaza 42000, Algeria
3
Department of Business Administration, College of Business, King Khalid University, Abha 62521, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Management, Université de Lorraine, CEREFIGE, F-57000 Metz, France
5
Faculty of Economics, Ain Temouchent University, Ain Temouchent 46000, Algeria
6
College of Business & Economics, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(10), 2302; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102302
Submission received: 24 March 2026 / Revised: 3 May 2026 / Accepted: 7 May 2026 / Published: 10 May 2026

Abstract

This study examines crude oil return dynamics in the context of the global energy transition, where decarbonization policies, technological innovation, and shifting energy demand increasingly influence market behavior. We propose a heavy-tailed distributional LSTM framework to jointly model the conditional mean, volatility, and tail risk of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) returns, incorporating key transition-related drivers: carbon allowance returns (ETS), artificial intelligence (AI) activity, electric vehicle (EV) market returns (SPKS), and geopolitical risk (GPR). Granger causality results show that ETS significantly predicts mean returns, reflecting the growing impact of climate policy signals, while AI and EV markets primarily affect volatility, indicating transmission through uncertainty channels. The model adopts a Student-t specification to capture heavy-tailed behavior and extreme price movements. Out-of-sample results reveal limited mean predictability but improved forecasting of return magnitude and tail risk. These findings highlight that, under energy transition dynamics, oil market predictability is increasingly concentrated in the risk dimension rather than in average returns.
Keywords: energy transition; crude oil forecasting; distributional LSTM; carbon markets (ETS); artificial intelligence; electric vehicles; geopolitical risk; volatility forecasting; tail risk energy transition; crude oil forecasting; distributional LSTM; carbon markets (ETS); artificial intelligence; electric vehicles; geopolitical risk; volatility forecasting; tail risk

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sendi, A.; Atif, D.; Abdelkader, S.B.; Mohammed, K.S. Crude Oil Prices Forecasting in the Energy Transition Era: Evidence from Geopolitical and Technological Drivers. Energies 2026, 19, 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102302

AMA Style

Sendi A, Atif D, Abdelkader SB, Mohammed KS. Crude Oil Prices Forecasting in the Energy Transition Era: Evidence from Geopolitical and Technological Drivers. Energies. 2026; 19(10):2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sendi, Asaad, Dalia Atif, Salim Bourchid Abdelkader, and Kamel Si Mohammed. 2026. "Crude Oil Prices Forecasting in the Energy Transition Era: Evidence from Geopolitical and Technological Drivers" Energies 19, no. 10: 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102302

APA Style

Sendi, A., Atif, D., Abdelkader, S. B., & Mohammed, K. S. (2026). Crude Oil Prices Forecasting in the Energy Transition Era: Evidence from Geopolitical and Technological Drivers. Energies, 19(10), 2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop