Next Article in Journal
Stress-Based Fatigue Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Blades Using Physics-Informed AI Reduced-Order Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Underground Coal Gasification Technology: A Review of Advantages, Challenges, and Economics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling an Industrial Distribution Network with Significant Photovoltaic Integration Using ATP-EMTP
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Do Energy Security Crises Accelerate Decarbonisation? The Case of REPowerEU

1
Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, 1100 Vienna, Austria
2
International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(1), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010200 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 November 2025 / Revised: 22 December 2025 / Accepted: 28 December 2025 / Published: 30 December 2025

Abstract

Energy security crises have historically been turning points for energy systems, exposing vulnerabilities, reshaping policy priorities, and boosting technological change. However, whether—and to what extent—such crises accelerate low-carbon transitions remains contested. This paper examines the effects of the 2022 energy crisis on the European Union (EU)’s energy transition, using policy analysis combined with a quantitative assessment of renewable energy trends, forecasts, and targets. We analyse the ambition, implementation, and outcomes of the REPowerEU plan, the main response to the crisis. In an unprecedented move, REPowerEU securitised renewable energy as a means to reduce dependence on Russian energy imports. However, the plan only moderately increased earlier renewable energy targets and did not reverse declining subsidies despite more forceful implementation measures. Its effects have been uneven across technologies. Already accelerating solar may overshoot its targets, onshore wind might only slightly accelerate beyond its current steady growth, and offshore wind remains constrained by economic and institutional uncertainties. Despite increased subsidies for fossil fuels, coal continued declining, oil remained stable, and natural gas dropped. Overall, REPowerEU sustained rather than transformed the EU’s low-carbon transition, illustrating both the potential and limits of accelerating decarbonisation under security crises.
Keywords: European Union; energy transition; energy security; renewable energy; energy policy; REPowerEU; policy targets; offshore wind; solar PV; onshore wind European Union; energy transition; energy security; renewable energy; energy policy; REPowerEU; policy targets; offshore wind; solar PV; onshore wind

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlenko, A.; Cherp, A. Do Energy Security Crises Accelerate Decarbonisation? The Case of REPowerEU. Energies 2026, 19, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010200

AMA Style

Pavlenko A, Cherp A. Do Energy Security Crises Accelerate Decarbonisation? The Case of REPowerEU. Energies. 2026; 19(1):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlenko, Anastasia, and Aleh Cherp. 2026. "Do Energy Security Crises Accelerate Decarbonisation? The Case of REPowerEU" Energies 19, no. 1: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010200

APA Style

Pavlenko, A., & Cherp, A. (2026). Do Energy Security Crises Accelerate Decarbonisation? The Case of REPowerEU. Energies, 19(1), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop