Next Article in Journal
Research on the Competition–Cooperation Relationship and Profit Allocation Between Virtual Power Plants and Traditional Power Plants Under Energy Transition
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch of Agricultural Park Integrated Energy Systems Based on Improved Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solar-Powered Interfacial Evaporation for Simultaneous Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Salinity Gradient Power Generation

1
China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China
2
Institute of Thermal Science and Power Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
3
School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource & Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
5
Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Energies 2025, 18(23), 6139; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236139
Submission received: 16 October 2025 / Revised: 8 November 2025 / Accepted: 13 November 2025 / Published: 24 November 2025

Abstract

Solar-driven interfacial evaporation desalination technology offers a feasible solution to the global shortage of freshwater resources. However, previous interfacial evaporation technologies have often only focused on the production of freshwater resources, without fully utilizing the high-energy photons in sunlight and the salinity gradient generated after seawater evaporation. In this work, a solar-driven water–hydrogen–electricity (SWHE) co-production system integrated by solar-driven interfacial evaporation (SIE), interface photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (IPHE), and reverse electrodialysis (RE) was proposed. The aim is to enhance the efficiency of solar energy utilization and achieve simultaneous production of freshwater, hydrogen, and electricity. Under 2-sun irradiation, the SWHE device achieved a water generation rate of 0.77 kg m−2 h−1, a hydrogen generation rate of 8.57 mmol m−2 h−1, and a highest power density of 2.9 mW m−2. Outdoor tests demonstrate that the cumulative water production reached 1.6 kg m−2 over 6 h, with a total hydrogen yield of 12.22 mmol m−2 and a highest power density of 0.095 mW m−2, which validated the environmental adaptability of SWHE system. This novel design strategy is expected to provide a novel form of freshwater resources and energy supply for human society.

1. Introduction

Freshwater resources are a necessary condition for maintaining the stable operation and healthy development of human society [1,2,3]. The rapid increase in population size, climate warmings, and intensification of environmental pollution have intensified the consumption of freshwater resources [4,5,6]. It is predicted that by 2050, the number of urban residents facing water shortages worldwide will rise to 2.373 billion [7]. A total of 97.2% of the water resources on the earth are seawater. Seawater desalination technology is considered as a viable solution for the freshwater resource crisis [8,9,10]. However, previous seawater desalination technologies (e.g., reverse osmosis and multi-stage flash distillation) are typically associated with issues of high energy consumption and environmental pollution [11,12]. Solar energy, as a renewable energy which is abundant and clean, has demonstrated great potential in the field of seawater conversion [13,14], environmental management [15], and energy production [16,17,18]. SIE technology is an advanced technique that takes photothermal materials as the core and converts solar energy into thermal energy by constructing local heat zones to achieve efficient evaporation [14,19].
In recent years, SIE has obtained much research due to its high-efficiency photothermal conversion, zero carbon emissions, and strong scalability [20]. Li et al. [21] typically built an ANF/MoS2@MXene evaporator which reached an evaporation rate of 1.42 kg m−2 h−1 with 1-sun irradiation and simultaneously realized broadband absorption through MXene and vertically dispersed MoS2 nanosheets. Han et al. [22] designed a one-dimensional Fe/C structured film for interface evaporation. Its unique one-dimensional evaporation structure reduced the enthalpy of pure water evaporation at 25 °C to 1388 kJ kg−1 and achieved an evaporation rate of 2.6 kg m−2 h−1 with 1-sun irradiation. Although the materials and structure used in evaporators are constantly being updated, the traditional single-effect evaporation system still faces a bottleneck of single resource output, which means that the potential energy generated as a by-product during the evaporation process has not been fully exploited [23,24,25].
Considering the bottleneck of single output from SIE, researchers have conducted extensive studies on multi-energy cogeneration systems based on SIE to recover the by-product energy such as the residual heat from the light–thermal conversion [17,26], latent heat of steam [27], and ion gradient at the interface [28,29]. Ho et al. [26] connected a Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric module to the bottom of an interface evaporator to convert the temperature gradient into electricity, reaching an evaporation rate of 1.36 kg m−2 h−1 by 1-sun irradiation and a power density of 0.4 W m−2. Zhou et al. [30] designed a device combining an interfacial evaporator with a Nafion membrane, which recovers the salinity gradient energy generated by seawater evaporation through a cation exchange membrane. With the light intensity of 1-sun irradiation, it achieved a vapor production rate of 1.1 kg m−2 h−1 and a power density of 1 W m−2. Huang et al. [31] developed an interface photocatalytic water hydrogen co-production system that consists of a photocatalytic layer and air-water collection materials, achieving a H2 generation rate of 425.4 μmol·g−1·h−1 while water vapor supply reached 0.121 kg m−2·h−1 with the light intensity of 1-sun irradiation. These studies blazed a new trail for the innovation of the SIE system from single freshwater production to water–energy cogeneration.
In this paper, a SWHE device with multi-energy collaborative production capabilities was proposed through integrating SIE technology, IPHE technology, and RE technology. SIE absorbs sunlight and transforms it into thermal energy for seawater evaporation. A portion of the water vapor generated during evaporation is split into hydrogen on the surface of a photocatalyst, while the rest condenses on the device walls to form collectable freshwater. The salinity gradient generated by seawater evaporation is recovered by the RE module, which uses ion-selective membranes to generate electricity. This device solely relies on solar energy as its power input source. It is anticipated to supply water and generate electricity for remote regions where there is a shortage of clean water and energy resources.

2. Experiment and Methods

2.1. Design Concept of the SWHE System

The design principle of the SWHE system is illustrated in Figure 1. A photothermal local heating interface was constructed with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) microporous hydrophobic membrane as the core. Deep gray Pt/TiO2, which exhibits high light absorption properties, was deposited on the PTFE membrane’s surface to serve as the IPHE module’s photocatalyst and the SIE module’s solar absorber. It is important to emphasize that the low surface energy of the PTFE membrane can effectively prevent the permeation of ions in liquid seawater, thus ensuring the stability of the photocatalyst. By coupling the evaporation interface with the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution interface, the full-spectrum utilization of solar energy can be achieved. Long-wave photons are absorbed to heat seawater and generate water vapor, providing raw materials for the IPHE module. Subsequently, a portion of the water vapor is cracked on the Pt/TiO2 surface under the action of short-wave high-energy photons, causing the hydrogen evolution reaction to occur, while the unreacted water vapor is collected through the condensation wall. Meanwhile, the successive evaporation of seawater causes a constant accumulation of concentration near the evaporation interface, which is significantly higher than that in the bulk seawater area. This salinity gradient energy caused by evaporation can be recovered through an RE module for electric output. Due to the concentration potential difference, cations in seawater form a directional migration through the cation exchange membrane (Nafion 117) to form a potential difference, and then the electric energy caused by ion migration is output (Ag/AgCl). The specific structure of the device is elaborated in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S1.

2.2. Material Characterization

As shown in Figure 2a, a Pt/TiO2–PTFE composite membrane was fabricated by loading Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst onto a PTFE hydrophobic membrane for the integration of SIE and IPHE. Firstly, 10 mg of Pt/TiO2 powder was mixed with 100 mL deionized water to form a suspension through ultrasonic diffusion. The preparation process of the Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst is shown in Figure S2. Subsequently, the composite membrane was formed by vacuum filtering the Pt/TiO2 powder onto the surface of PTFE hydrophobic membrane and then drying it. Figure 2b shows the physical image of the Pt/TiO2–PTFE composite membrane with a surface color of dark gray. SEM images demonstrate that the Pt/TiO2 catalyst particles are successfully and consistently bonded to the PTFE membrane’s upper surface’s polyethylene terephthalate support layer (Figure 2c). Meanwhile, the cross-sectional SEM for thickness shows that the thickness of this composite film is only 109.21 μm (Figure S3). The lower surface of the PTFE membrane shows a distinct porous network structure with an average pore diameter of approximately 0.22 μm, which provides a transport channel for water vapor. The static contact angle tests on both sides of the composite membrane were 123.3° and 127.3°, respectively, indicating that the composite membrane has excellent hydrophobic properties (Figures S4 and S5). As shown in Figure 2d, within all solar radiation bands, from 300 to 2500 nm, the composite film’s absorption rate can reach 92.5% (weighted by AM 1.5G) due to the roughness of the Pt/TiO2 powder and the high blackness. The PTFE surface’s elemental mapping by the EDS further verified that Pt, Ti, and O elements were evenly deposited across the surface. This suggested that the hydrophobic membrane surface had a significant amount of catalysts that could be utilized for photocatalytic reactions (Figure 2e). The XPS confirmed the successful synthesis of Pt/TiO2 (Figure S6).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evaluation of Basic Performance

To evaluate the water–hydrogen–electricity cogeneration capacity of the system, tests were first conducted in the controlled laboratory environment. Figure 3a shows an experimental test system layout. Figure S7 shows the layout of the actual experimental testing system. The uncertainties of the freshwater production process (UW), hydrogen production process (UH), and salinity gradient power generation (UE) of this system are 5.00%, 5.83%, and 5.00%, respectively. Figure 3b shows the under light intensity of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation, the steady-state temperature of the evaporation interface reached 42 °C, 45 °C, and 50 °C, respectively. Figure 3c shows that the freshwater generation rate of the SWHE reached 0.42 kg·m−2·h−1, 0.61 kg·m−2·h−1, and 0.77 kg·m−2·h−1 under solar intensities of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation, respectively. The primary cause of this is the increase in water vapor partial pressure on the evaporation side due to the rising temperature of seawater; this thus causes the vapor flux to rise. Under the synergistic action of the ultraviolet spectrum and the Pt/TiO2 catalyst, partial water vapor undergoes the PTFE membrane for cracking to generate H2, as shown in Figure 3d. After three hours of operation, the hydrogen generation of SWHE reached 11.21 mmol·m−2, 16.77 mmol·m−2, and 25.72 mmol·m−2 under light intensities of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation, respectively. In comparison to 1-sun irradiation of light intensity, the production of hydrogen increased significantly by up to 129% under 2 kW·m−2 of light intensity. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the photothermal–photocatalytic synergy mechanism. Specifically, the elevation of temperature decreases the activation energy of the reaction. Simultaneously, the augmentation of photon flux density elevates the concentration of electron-hole pairs. This increase effectively surmounts the reaction energy barrier, and the variation in the reaction Gibbs free energy is directly offset by solar energy.
Continuous evaporation leads to varying salt concentrations on either side of the Nafion 117 membrane. Driven by the concentration gradient, Na+ migrates through the Nafion 117 membrane towards the side with lower concentration, while Cl is selectively blocked. The Nernst equation indicates a positive correlation between the ion concentration in solution and voltage output of RE. Under light intensities of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation, the salt content of the brine in the distillation chamber increased from 3.5 wt% to 4.94 wt%, 6.08 wt%, and 7.56 wt%, respectively (Figure S8). This can be primarily attributed to the temperature rise, which enhances the seawater evaporation rate and consequently increases the salinity gradient. Under the synergistic effect of temperature and the salinity gradient, the ion diffusion flux across the Nafion 117 membrane is enhanced, significantly increasing the open-circuit voltage of the system. As shown in Figure 3e, under light intensities of 1-sun, 1.5-sun, and 2-sun irradiation, the open-circuit voltages of the device reached 10.44 mV, 18.45 mV, and 27.9 mV, respectively. A notable acceleration in the voltage increase rate was observed after 60 min, coinciding with the rise and eventual stabilization of the temperature at the evaporation interface. High solar intensity not only increases the concentration gradient between solutions by enhancing the evaporation rate, but also boosts the ion migration efficiency through thermodynamic effects. Under light intensities of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation, the SWHE’s highest output power was 0.28 mW·m−2, 0.85 mW·m−2, and 2.9 mW·m−2, separately (Figure S9). Figure 3f shows the water, hydrogen, and electricity production capacity of the SWHE with various light intensities. Under the irradiation of 2-sun irradiation, the output capacity of the device is the highest, with water generation reaching 1.844 kg·m−2, hydrogen production reaching 25.72 mmol·m−2, and the maximum voltage reaching 27.9 mV.

3.2. Reliability Testing of the Device

To verify the operational reliability of the device in actual complex environments, the performance of the device was systematically evaluated using real seawater as the feed solution. Additionally, a Poisson–Nernst–Planck theory-based numerical simulation model was developed to deeply analyze the physical and chemical processes involved in the device’s operation. The established two-dimensional axisymmetric model is shown in Figure 4a. On both sides, there are two cylindrical nano-solution pools, each measuring Rp in radius and Lp in length. The two solution pools are connected by a cylindrical nano-channel with a radius of Rp and a length of Lp. The nano-channel wall is negatively charged. Details of the boundary conditions (Table S2) and model structural data (Table S3) are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
To investigate the reliability of the SWHE system, the change in seawater salt concentration was calculated based on the system’s water generation rate, and a numerical simulation was conducted to analyze the power output capacity of the RE module. After being exposed to solar intensities of 1-sun irradiation, 1.5-sun irradiation, and 2-sun irradiation for 3 h, the simulated open-circuit voltages were 12 mV, 18.7 mV, and 27.5 mV, respectively. The corresponding experimental values were 10.439 mV, 18.454 mV, and 27.91 mV, with relative errors of 14.9%, 1.33%, and 1.47%, respectively (Figure 4b). Figure 4c shows the trend of the simulated current of the SWHE varying with solar intensity by different solar intensities. The simulation results are essentially in line with the outcomes of the experiment, which shows that ion transport in the Nafion 117 membrane can be adequately described by this model. Furthermore, to investigate the influence of light intensity variation on ion diffusion, this paper calculated the variation in the ion diffusion coefficient along the axial direction of the pore under varying solar intensities. Figure 4d shows that the N+ diffusion coefficient grows with the enhancement of light intensity, and this phenomenon is particularly significant on the side closer to the light source. This is explained by the interface evaporator absorbs spectral energy, causing the temperature and concentration of the water body to increase. This promotes the electrophoretic movement of ions from the high-concentration side to the low-concentration side, thereby generating a larger ion current.
Compared with the NaCl solution that simulates seawater, the composition of real seawater is often more complex, which poses challenges to the practical application of the device. This study employed a systematic test with real seawater to evaluate the reliability of the device. Figure 4e shows that with the light intensity of 1 kW m−2, the device achieved the highest voltage of 14 mV and highest hydrogen generation rate of 11.48 mmol m−2. Subsequent water quality tests on the desalinated water obtained through condensation and real seawater showed that the concentration of K+ dropped from roughly 875 mg L−1 to 1.07 mg L−1, Ca2+ from 561 mg L−1 to 6.9 mg L−1, Na+ from 9978 mg L−1 to 5.82 mg L−1, and Mg 2+ from 1604 mg L−1 to 0.28 mg L−1. These results met the drinking water standards set by the World Health Organization, demonstrating the excellent desalination capability of the SWHE device (Figure 4f).

4. Outdoor Performance Evaluation

To verify the operational capability of the SWHE equipment in real outdoor environments, on 8 April 2025, from 9:00 to 15:00, an outdoor experiment was carried out on the rooftop of the Wuhan Institute of Technology laboratory building. Figure 5a shows the layout of the outdoor experimental setup, where a hygrograph and a solar intensity meter are used to detect the real-time variation in environmental temperature and solar intensity over time. The setup collects hydrogen gas in the chamber every 30 min using a micro-injector and delivers it to a gas chromatograph for detection. The voltage output of the device is monitored in real time by a KDMS-2450 source meter.
Figure 5b shows that the average daily light intensity was 803 W·m−2 while the average ambient temperature was 31.36 °C. The SWHE is exposed to sunlight, allowing water vapor to pass through the Pt/TiO2–PTFE composite membrane and condense on the wall surface, thereby transforming into water droplets to be collected (Figure 5c). Figure 5d shows the variation in hydrogen generation and voltage during the operation of the SWHE device. Eventually, 12.22 mmol m−2 of hydrogen was collected. In addition, a 14.56 mV open-circuit voltage as well as a 0.095 mW·m−2 highest power density were attained (Figure 5e). It is worth noting that the hydrogen production rate fluctuates with the variation in light intensity, as shown in Figure 5f. At the peak solar intensity period of 12:30 (0.97 kW m−2), the hydrogen evolution rate reached a peak of 3.9 mmol·m−2·h−1, indicating that the fluctuation of light intensity directly affects the carrier separation efficiency of the photocatalytic active sites. After 6 h of outdoor operation, SWHE achieved the water production of 1.6 kg·m−2, hydrogen generation of 12.22 mmol·m−2, and a maximum output power of 95.5 µW m−2 (Figure 5g). The outdoor experimental results fully demonstrate that the SWHE device can stably produce freshwater, hydrogen, and electricity in an environment with fluctuating natural solar intensity and temperature changes.
In summary, this system not only produces freshwater through interface evaporation, but also simultaneously generates hydrogen energy and electrical energy by utilizing the high-energy photons in sunlight and the salinity gradient generated during evaporation. Thus, it achieves efficient utilization of solar energy. A detailed comparison of this SWHE multi-energy combined system with other systems can be found in Supplementary Materials Table S4.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study successfully developed and demonstrated a hybrid solar-driven water–hydrogen–electricity co-production system that integrates interfacial evaporation, photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, and reverse electrodialysis. The key conclusions are as follows: (i) Unlike the previous SIE systems, the SWHE system effectively utilizes the additional salinity gradient generated during the interface evaporation process and the high-energy photons in sunlight, significantly improving the efficiency of solar energy utilization and achieving additional hydrogen and electrical energy outputs. The analysis of the experimental results shows that with the light intensity of 2-sun irradiation, SWHE can achieve a freshwater generation rate of 0.77 kg·m−2 h−1, a hydrogen generation rate of 25.72 mmol·m−2, and a highest power density of 2.9 mW·m−2. (ii) Experimental results align well with numerical simulations based on the Poisson–Nernst–Planck model, confirming the reliability of the proposed mechanism and system design. (iii) Moreover, SWHE can still maintain stable operation in the outdoor real environment (the average light intensity is 803 W m−2), achieving a freshwater generation rate of 0.27 kg m−2 h−1, a hydrogen production rate of 3.9 mmol m−2 h−1, and a highest power density of 0.095 mW m−2.
Although this study demonstrates the successful co-production of freshwater, hydrogen, and electricity, certain limitations in the SWHE system remain and warrant further investigation: (i) The hydrogen production efficiency of the device needs to be further improved. In the future, higher-efficiency and low-cost photocatalytic materials can be adopted to increase the hydrogen output of the device. (ii) The system performance needs to be optimized. By introducing low-grade waste heat or improving the structure of the device, it can adapt to low light intensity and fluctuating natural environments, enabling the device to operate. Overall, the proposal of this system provides a new idea for efficient solar energy utilization in the interface evaporation process and helps to build a sustainable new energy production system.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en18236139/s1, Figure S1: Structure and device assembly of SWHE; Figure S2: Photos of the preparation process of Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst; Figure S3: The cross-section SEM for thickness; Figure S4: The static contact angle of the Pt/TiO2-PTFE composite membrane is 123.33°. (On the side loaded with the catalyst); Figure S5: The static contact angle of the Pt/TiO2-PTFE composite membrane is 127.319°. (The side that comes into contact with seawater); Figure S6: XPS image of Pt/TiO2-PTFE; Figure S7: Diagram of laboratory experiment system; Figure S8: The Variation of seawater concentration under different solar Intensities; Figure S9: Power output of the SWHE device under different solar intensities; Table S1: List of uncertainties; Table S2: List of parameters for the simulation model; Table S3: Simulation condition settings; Table S4: Comparison with other systems. References [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] are cited in supplementary file.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G., G.D., L.H. and X.H.; Methodology, R.G., G.D., Y.Z., H.H., X.Y., S.L., B.H. and J.P.; Investigation, G.D.; Writing—original draft, R.G. and G.D.; Writing—review & editing, L.H. and X.H.; Supervision, L.H.; Funding acquisition, L.H. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province grant number (No. 2023AFB078).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Ruiying Gao, Ying Zhang, Hanhua He, Xinxing Yin, Shan Luo and Baolin Huang were employed by the China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SWHESolar-driven water–hydrogen–electricity
SIESolar-driven interfacial evaporation
IPHEInterface photocatalytic hydrogen evolution
REReverse electrodialysis
PTFEPolytetrafluoroethylene
SEMScanning electron microscope
EDSEnergy dispersive spectrometer
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

References

  1. Curto, D.; Franzitta, V.; Guercio, A. A review of the water desalination technologies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rosa, L.; Sangiorgio, M. Global water gaps under future warming levels. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bernauer, T.; Böhmelt, T. International conflict and cooperation over freshwater resources. Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, M.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Rijneveld, R.; Beier, F.; Bak, M.P.; Batool, M.; Droppers, B.; Popp, A.; van Vliet, M.T.H.; Strokal, M. A triple increase in global river basins with water scarcity due to future pollution. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pokhrel, Y.; Felfelani, F.; Satoh, Y.; Boulange, J.; Burek, P.; Gädeke, A.; Gerten, D.; Gosling, S.N.; Grillakis, M.; Gudmundsson, L.; et al. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, G.; Gao, H.L.; Li, Y.; Tang, Q.; Woolway, R.I.; Merder, J.; Rosa, L.; Michalak, A.M. Decoupling of surface water storage from precipitation in global drylands due to anthropogenic activity. Nat. Water 2025, 3, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, C.Y.; Liu, Z.F.; Wu, J.G.; Pan, X.; Fang, Z.; Li, J.; Bryan, B.A. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, X.H.; Mishra, D.D.; Wang, X.B.; Peng, H.; Hu, C. Towards highly efficient solar-driven interfacial evaporation for desalination. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 17907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, J.; Cai, Y.C.; Zhang, C.H.; Wei, W.; Chen, C.; Liu, L.; Yang, K.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tseng, C.-C.; et al. Fast water transport and molecular sieving through ultrathin ordered conjugated-polymer-framework membranes. Nat. Mater. 2022, 21, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, X.S.; Wei, W.F.; Feng, X.Z.; Wang, R.; Yang, S.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, H. Photovoltaic-Driven Battery Deionization System for Efficient and Sustainable Seawater Desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 22992–23003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, Z.H.; Xu, J.W.; Liang, Y.Z.; Luo, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; He, J.; Chen, Y. Bioinspired Solar-Driven Osmosis for Stable High Flux Desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 3800–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. He, S.X.; Zhang, W.; Gu, Z.L. Ultrafast seawater desalination with phosphorene oxide nanochannel based membrane: Nonmonotonic relationship between oxidation degree and water permeability. Desalination 2023, 563, 116751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, G.; Xu, Y.; Ding, T.; Li, J.; Yin, J.; Fei, W.; Cao, Y.; Yu, J.; Yuan, L.; Gong, L.; et al. Water-evaporation-induced electricity with nanostructured carbon materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. George, N.; Gabriel, L.; Boriskina, S.; Li, H.; Yang, W.; Zhang, T.; Chen, G. Steam generation under one sun enabled by a floating structure with thermal concentration. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, Y.L.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhang, X.Z.; Lv, B.; Xu, Y.; Fan, X. Co-enhancing volatile organic compound degradation and steam generation in solar interfacial evaporation by integrating with electro-Fenton. Water. Res. 2025, 277, 123348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, T.; Wu, M.; Xu, J.X.; Du, R.; Yan, T.; Wang, P.; Bai, Z.; Wang, R.; Wang, S. Simultaneous atmospheric water production and 24-hour power generation enabled by moisture-induced energy harvesting. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, Y.; Ding, T.P.; Gao, M.M.; Chan, K.H.; Cheng, Y.; He, J.; Ho, G.W. Controlled heterogeneous water distribution and evaporation towards enhanced photothermal water-electricity-hydrogen production. Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jang, J.H.; Kang, J.H.; Ghule, B.; Kim, H.; Jang, J.-H. An Approach to Enhance PEC Water Splitting Performance through Al: Ti Codoping in Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Photoanode: The Effect of Al3+ as a Codopant. ACS Materials Lett. 2024, 6, 2897–2904. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, X.Q.; Min, X.Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Xu, N.; Zhu, P.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, S. Storage and recycling of interfacial solar steam enthalpy. Joule 2018, 2, 2477–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tanaka, H.; Nosoko, T.; Nagata, T. A highly productive basin-type-multiple-effect coupled solar still. Desalination 2000, 130, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, M.M.; Zheng, R.Q.; Wang, M.J.; Li, X. A MoS2-based evaporator with porous structure and interlayer channels for solar desalination and photocatalytic degradation. Sol. Energy 2024, 279, 112853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ning, J.Q.; Yang, C.L.; Mei, Q.Y.; Huang, L.; Han, K. One-dimensional Fe/C constructed Janus membrane enables highly-efficient and stable solar-driven interfacial evaporation. Adv. Membr. 2024, 4, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mojtaba, E.M.; Lu, Q.; Yang, R.; Lu, Q. All-in-One Hybrid Solar-Driven Interfacial Evaporators for Cogeneration of Clean Water and Electricity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2412870. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, X.T.; Zhang, J.P. Highly salt-resistant and all-weather solar-driven interfacial evaporators with photothermal and electrothermal effects based on Janus graphene @ silicone sponges. Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.; Peng, L.M.; Yang, W.; Tang, C.-Y.; Pu, J.-H.; Zha, X.-J.; Ke, K.; Bao, R.-Y.; Yang, M.-B. All-weather-available, continuous steam generation based on the synergistic photo-thermal and electro-thermal conversion by MXene-based aerogels. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, L.L.; Ding, T.P.; Gao, M.M.; Peh, C.K.N.; Ho, G.W. Shape Conformal and Thermal Insulative Organic Solar Absorber Sponge for Photothermal Water Evaporation and Thermoelectric Power Generation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, W.B.; Shi, Y.S.; Zhang, C.L.; Hong, S.; Shi, L.; Chang, J.; Li, R.; Jin, Y.; Ong, C.; Zhuo, S.; et al. Simultaneous production of fresh water and electricity via multistage solar photovoltaic membrane distillation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, P.H.; Liu, K.; Chen, Q.; Li, J.; Duan, J.; Xue, G.; Xu, Z.; Xie, W.; Zhou, J. Solar-driven simultaneous steam production and electricity generation from salinity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1923–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, Z.A.; Han, C.L.; Gao, S.W.; Li, Z.; Jing, M.; Yu, H.; Wang, Z. Achieving efficient power generation by designing bioinspired and multi-layered interfacial evaporator. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, F.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, X.; Shi, W.; Yu, G. Materials for solar-powered water evaporation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 388–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qin, C.L.; Gui, C.X.; Ren, T.; Huang, L.; Liu, P.; Wei, Q.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Fan, K. Solar-driven hydrogen and water co-generation based on atmospheric water harvesting. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 504, 158721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kilsgaard, B.S.; Haldrup, S.; Catalano, J.; Bentien, A. High figure of merit for electrokinetic energy conversion in Nafion membranes. J. Power Sources 2014, 247, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koh, W.H.; Silverman, H.P. Anion transport in thin-channel cation exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1983, 13, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hsu, J.P.; Tai, Y.H.; Yeh, L.H.; Tseng, S. Importance of temperature effect on the electrophoretic behavior of charge-regulated particles. Langmuir 2012, 28, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tseng, S.; Li, Y.M.; Lin, C.Y.; Hsu, J.P. Salinity gradient power: Influences of temperature and nanopore size. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 2350–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaule, S.; Khudoyarov, D.; Kim, S.; Yoon, Y.; Jang, J.H. Inverse-L Shaped Evaporator Based on La1−xSrxMnO3 Perovskite with Efficient Salt Collection via Localized Salt Gradient. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2501360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; He, J.J.; Ye, C.W.; Tang, S.C. Achieving Ultrahigh Voltage Over 100 V and Remarkable Freshwater Harvesting Based on Thermodiffusion Enhanced Hydrovoltaic Generator. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024, 14, 2400529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, G.X.; Liu, H.J.; Liu, K.K.; Wang, H.Y.; Wen, X.Y.; Liu, L.J.; She, Y.; Feng, L.L.; Niu, R.; Gong, J. All-In-One Carbon Foam Evaporators for Efficient Co-Generation of Freshwater and Electricity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2423781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.C.; Zhao, H.N.; Chen, W.S.; Li, J.H.; Deng, L.; et al. Photothermal interface with high-adhesive superhydrophobicity to construct vapor splitting module for hydrogen evolution from seawater. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 346, 123743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pornrungroj, C.; Mohamad Annuar, A.B.; Wang, Q.; Rahaman, M.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Andrei, V.; Reisner, E. Hybrid photothermal-photocatalyst sheets for solar-driven overall water splitting coupled to water purification. Nat. Water. 2023, 1, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Design concept of the SWHE system.
Figure 1. Design concept of the SWHE system.
Energies 18 06139 g001
Figure 2. Preparation and characterization of the Pt/TiO2–PTFE composite membrane: (a) Preparation steps of the composite membrane; (b) Physical image of the composite membrane; (c) SEM image of the composite membrane; (d) Composite membrane’s absorption spectra in the solar band; (e) Energy spectrum of Pt/TiO2 on the surface of the composite membrane.
Figure 2. Preparation and characterization of the Pt/TiO2–PTFE composite membrane: (a) Preparation steps of the composite membrane; (b) Physical image of the composite membrane; (c) SEM image of the composite membrane; (d) Composite membrane’s absorption spectra in the solar band; (e) Energy spectrum of Pt/TiO2 on the surface of the composite membrane.
Energies 18 06139 g002
Figure 3. Assessment of the water, hydrogen, and electricity generation capabilities of the SWHE in the laboratory setting: (a) Experimental test system layout; (b) Variation in temperature within the seawater distillation chamber under varying light intensities; (c) The SWHE’s water production rate under varying light intensities; (d) Hydrogen yield of the SWHE with varying light intensities; (e) Voltage fluctuations of the SWHE with varying light intensities; (f) Summary of the water–hydrogen–electricity outputs of the SWHE with varying light intensities.
Figure 3. Assessment of the water, hydrogen, and electricity generation capabilities of the SWHE in the laboratory setting: (a) Experimental test system layout; (b) Variation in temperature within the seawater distillation chamber under varying light intensities; (c) The SWHE’s water production rate under varying light intensities; (d) Hydrogen yield of the SWHE with varying light intensities; (e) Voltage fluctuations of the SWHE with varying light intensities; (f) Summary of the water–hydrogen–electricity outputs of the SWHE with varying light intensities.
Energies 18 06139 g003
Figure 4. Simulation of the RE module and operational conditions of the SWHE device under seawater conditions: (a) RE simulation model; (b) The variation in the simulated voltage and actual voltage of the device at various light intensities; (c) Comparing the experimental current and simulated current under varying light intensities; (d) Ion diffusion coefficient along the pore axis; (e) Hydrogen and electricity generation capacity of the SWHE device under the light intensity of 1-sun irradiation; (f) Comparison of ion concentrations in condensate water and seawater for the SWHE device.
Figure 4. Simulation of the RE module and operational conditions of the SWHE device under seawater conditions: (a) RE simulation model; (b) The variation in the simulated voltage and actual voltage of the device at various light intensities; (c) Comparing the experimental current and simulated current under varying light intensities; (d) Ion diffusion coefficient along the pore axis; (e) Hydrogen and electricity generation capacity of the SWHE device under the light intensity of 1-sun irradiation; (f) Comparison of ion concentrations in condensate water and seawater for the SWHE device.
Energies 18 06139 g004
Figure 5. Performance of the SWHE under real outdoor environmental conditions: (a) Exterior view of the SWHE experimental device; (b) Variations in outdoor light intensity and ambient temperature; (c) Temporal evolution of hydrogen and electricity production by the SWHE device; (d) Spatial distribution of condensate water within the SWHE device; (e) Output power generated by the SWHE device; (f) Temporal changes in the hydrogen production rate of the SWHE device under varying conditions; (g) Summary of the operational products of the SWHE device in an outdoor setting.
Figure 5. Performance of the SWHE under real outdoor environmental conditions: (a) Exterior view of the SWHE experimental device; (b) Variations in outdoor light intensity and ambient temperature; (c) Temporal evolution of hydrogen and electricity production by the SWHE device; (d) Spatial distribution of condensate water within the SWHE device; (e) Output power generated by the SWHE device; (f) Temporal changes in the hydrogen production rate of the SWHE device under varying conditions; (g) Summary of the operational products of the SWHE device in an outdoor setting.
Energies 18 06139 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, R.; Ding, G.; Zhang, Y.; He, H.; Yin, X.; Luo, S.; Huang, B.; Huang, L.; Pei, J.; Hu, X. Solar-Powered Interfacial Evaporation for Simultaneous Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Salinity Gradient Power Generation. Energies 2025, 18, 6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236139

AMA Style

Gao R, Ding G, Zhang Y, He H, Yin X, Luo S, Huang B, Huang L, Pei J, Hu X. Solar-Powered Interfacial Evaporation for Simultaneous Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Salinity Gradient Power Generation. Energies. 2025; 18(23):6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Ruiying, Gaoming Ding, Ying Zhang, Hanhua He, Xinxing Yin, Shan Luo, Baolin Huang, Lu Huang, Junxian Pei, and Xuejiao Hu. 2025. "Solar-Powered Interfacial Evaporation for Simultaneous Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Salinity Gradient Power Generation" Energies 18, no. 23: 6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236139

APA Style

Gao, R., Ding, G., Zhang, Y., He, H., Yin, X., Luo, S., Huang, B., Huang, L., Pei, J., & Hu, X. (2025). Solar-Powered Interfacial Evaporation for Simultaneous Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Salinity Gradient Power Generation. Energies, 18(23), 6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop