1. Introduction
The substation serves as the core of the power grid, ensuring the normal operation of the power transmission [
1]. In a substation, there are some critical loads used to support its operation, known as auxiliary systems, consisting of protection systems, communication systems, computers, and monitoring systems [
2]. When a fault occurs in the upper power grid, the relay protection and communication systems need to act in time to prevent the fault from spreading, so the auxiliary system of the substation has strict requirements for uninterrupted energy supply [
3,
4]. Therefore, it is imperative to install backup power systems at substations to mitigate risks such as grid faults or internal station short circuits. The auxiliary system structure of a 220 kV substation is illustrated in
Figure 1.
At present, backup power for substation auxiliary systems is widely provided by diesel generators and lead–acid batteries [
5,
6]. However, diesel generators raise environmental concerns, while lead–acid batteries face challenges in terms of energy density, charging rate, and environmental concerns [
7]. Lithium batteries are often considered as potential substitutes. Costa et al. [
8] demonstrated that integrating both lithium batteries and lead–acid batteries as backup power for the substation auxiliary system is more cost-effective and performs better than lead–acid batteries solely. However, lithium batteries are not suitable for prolonged float charging, which restricts their performance as a long-term backup power source.
Compared with batteries, hydrogen energy storage offers longer lifespan, smaller size and upper long-term storage capabilities. These features can substantially extend the power supply duration and enhance reliability when serving as a backup power source [
9]. Moreover, it has been investigated for use as a long-term energy storage solution in microgrids [
10,
11]. In [
12], a comprehensive hydrogen–electric energy system is established to generate electricity, produce hydrogen, and supply hydrogen load, improving the system’s revenue. The application of hydrogen energy storage in substations has already been started. Yang et al. [
13] incorporated wind power and hydrogen energy storage into a railway substation to enhance power supply capacity and reduce electricity costs. Obara et al. [
14] installed a hydrogen storage device in a substation to supplement the lower feeder power supply. In [
15], hydrogen fuel cells were used as backup power for the auxiliary system in substations with a small portion of lead–acid batteries. However, the paper did not analyze where the fuel of hydrogen cells come from, and the extended power supply time and reduced cost of hydrogen fuel cells were not quantified.
Furthermore, besides energy storage, photovoltaic (PV) power generation, as a clean alternative energy source, can also serve as a generation unit for substation auxiliary system [
16]. In 1995, a substation in California, USA, added PV power generation to reduce line losses and enhance the reliability of the distribution system [
17]. De Araujo Silva Júnior et al. [
18] established a substation microgrid comprising a hybrid PV and Li-PbC energy storage system, evaluating its roles in supporting daily operations and emergency response. The study highlights that a PV–storage hybrid microgrid can serve as a novel approach to providing uninterrupted power to substation auxiliary systems. Properly matching the two components enables the system to harness the advantages of both renewable energy generation and energy storage.
Due to the high cost of batteries, a more comprehensive approach is necessary. Reasonable capacity configuration can maximize normal operational benefits for the substation while also meeting demand for backup power during faults and emergencies. Tabares et al. [
19] built a micro-grid with PV power and lead–acid batteries to supply auxiliary services during a contingency for a substation. They used Monte Carlo simulation and exhaustive search to determine the required emergency power supply capacity, considering battery costs. Ribic et al. [
20] presented a capacity configuration model for lead–acid battery backup power in a substation auxiliary system using the differential evolution method. The model considered building and maintenance costs, temperature retention costs, and system reliability. In [
21], a multi-objective optimization model is proposed for a PV–battery system in substation. This model considers investment costs and contingency availability indicators to configure energy storage capacity, which offers valuable insights for configuring emergency power supply in substation auxiliary systems. However, these literatures only utilize energy storage for emergency power supply, failing to fully exploit its potential such as peak shaving and valley filling.
Additionally, the backup power microgrid discussed in the aforementioned article has no operating strategies besides charging when connected to the grid, whereas control strategies are essential for optimizing performance and efficiency. Microgrid scheduling methods are divided into optimization-based methods and rule-based methods. Optimization-based methods aim to minimize system operating costs and power fluctuations over a given period (usually from several hours to several days) to find a global optimal solution [
22]. Ji et al. [
23] employ non-dominated sorting to study multi-objective optimization strategies for active distribution networks, achieving global optimization of system output, operation times, network loss, and node voltage deviation. Rule-based methods determine microgrid power distribution rules based on human experience and expert knowledge. Yuan et al. [
24] propose a rule-based real-time environmental management system for fuel cell/battery hybrid power systems, optimizing power distribution between fuel cells and batteries. Lopez et al. [
25] present a rule-based power management system for a hydrogen-supercapacitor hybrid generator, managing various power sources. Optimization-based methods require significant computational power for real-time global optimization, which is challenging due to the limited resources of microcontrollers and the aging equipment in substations. In contrast, rule-based strategies are simple, robust, and have low computational complexity, making them effective for stable and reliable power distribution even with limited resources.
Therefore, this paper proposes a PV-based electric–hydrogen microgrid solution for substations, which not only meets emergency backup supply requirements but also enhances profitability during routine operations. The main contributions of the paper are as follows:
We propose a dual-purpose electric–hydrogen microgrid solution for substation auxiliary systems, leveraging idle rooftop and ground space for PV and hydrogen equipment. This approach is shown to not only meet critical emergency backup requirements but also enhance daily operational profitability by enabling services such as peak shaving and valley filling.
We formulate detailed operational strategies for both normal and fault scenarios, addressing a key gap in the literature which often lacks strategies beyond simple grid charging. The normal operation strategy optimizes energy distribution based on time-of-use tariffs and weather conditions, while the fault strategy details the critical coordination of the hybrid storage system. In particular, it uses the lithium battery’s rapid response to bridge the fuel cell’s startup time, ensuring a truly seamless power supply to critical loads.
We introduce an optimization model that mathematically embeds the fault strategy as a hard constraint. Unlike conventional models that primarily optimize for daily economics, our approach first calculates the non-negotiable backup energy required during faults, defining it as a ’safety-first’ operational boundary. This methodology ensures the system’s robustness is mathematically guaranteed, while the remaining capacity is then optimized for daily profitability.
The rest of this paper is structured as follows: The principle and theoretical analysis are presented in
Section 2. The rule-based scheduling strategy for normal and fault conditions are presented in
Section 3. The modeling and algorithm for capacity configuration are detailed in
Section 4. A case study is provided in
Section 5. The conclusions of this work are drawn in
Section 6.
5. Case Study
To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed microgrid, the case study takes a 220 kV substation as an example to construct an electric–hydrogen backup power microgrid and calculate its capacity configuration. The unit capacity of photovoltaic power is 30 kW, with a maximum allowable abandonment rate of photovoltaic power set at 3% according to experience. Meteorological data, including sunlight radiation and temperature for a typical year in a specific region of Northwest China, are obtained from Meteonorm software (version 8.0). During normal operations, hydrogen is transported and sold every 10 days. The economic parameters of the electric hydrogen backup power microgrid are presented in
Table 3, while the electricity prices by time of use are shown in
Table 4. Detailed technical parameters are listed in
Appendix A.
According to
Table 1, under normal conditions, the auxiliary load is stable at around 10 kW throughout the day, with slight fluctuations. In the event of a fault, the uninterrupted load increases to approximately 20 kW, including additional loads like UPS and emergency lighting. At the moment of failure, the breakers and switches require temporary power from the microgrid, with a potential peak power demand of up to 25 kW (
Figure 7).
5.1. Calculation of HESS Capacity Required for Fault Support
Typically, the specified fault support time for a substation is 2 h. However, due to uncertainty in the duration of the fault, this study assumes a 10-h support time for critical loads and evaluates scenarios ranging from 2 to 10 h for economic analysis. This approach prevents the substation load from being affected by prolonged faults, which could lead to more extensive failures. A comparison is made between the battery-only power supply and the electric–hydrogen HESS microgrid power supply.
To ensure the system has sufficient margin to handle uncertainties in actual use, both energy storage systems are configured at 1.2 times the required capacity. Furthermore, in the HESS scenario, lithium batteries are configured at 2.5 times the required capacity. The calculations are performed using Equation (
7)–(10). To ensure the responsiveness of the backup power source, the short-term power from relay protection is handled by the battery, thus the fuel cell only needs 20 kW. The configuration and economic results are listed in
Table 5.
Figure 8 shows the comparison of purchasing costs for two energy storage strategies. The results indicate that when the power supply duration exceeds 7 h, using HESS is more cost-effective than using only batteries. In particular, for 8-h and 10-h power supply durations, the cost of using HESS is 17.96% and 32.63% lower, respectively, compared to batteries. This demonstrates that as power supply time increases, the cost advantage of HESS over batteries grows, leading to better overall economy.
Additionally, since the energy storage components (hydrogen storage tank) and energy supply components (fuel cells) of hydrogen energy storage are independent, expanding the capacity of hydrogen storage is more convenient. Given that hydrogen storage tanks are much cheaper than fuel cells and batteries, this significantly reduces costs. Furthermore, with advancements in hydrogen storage technology, HESS will become increasingly competitive for large-capacity emergency energy storage in the future.
5.2. Optimized Configuration Results for HESS Capacity
To confirm the advantages of the proposed microgrid backup power system, three substation backup power system scenarios are designed:
No microgrid, relying solely on a lithium battery for backup power.
No PV system, relying on a combination of lithium batteries and hydrogen storage for backup power.
Integrates both PV and HESS, representing the proposed backup power system in this paper.
In comparing the optimization results of the three backup power systems (
Table 6), the battery rated power is 25 kW in all cases, matching the power required in fault scenarios. This is because the difference between the photovoltaic output (maximum 30 kW) and the auxiliary load power (around 10 kW during normal operation) is less than 25 kW, so the battery charging and discharging power needed for daily operations is not high.
Scenario I: To ensure 10 h of power supply during a fault, a large battery capacity is required, significantly increasing the equipment purchase cost. Although lithium batteries provide peak shaving and valley filling during normal operations, reducing the system’s grid power purchase cost, their peak-valley arbitrage income is limited due to the station transformer capacity, leading to wasted battery capacity.
Scenario II: After introducing the hydrogen storage system, hydrogen storage can produce hydrogen in large quantities during off-peak electricity prices, providing peak shaving, valley filling, and hydrogen sales revenue. Because the unit capacity cost of hydrogen storage tanks is much lower than that of lithium batteries, the battery capacity is reduced to the minimum needed to ensure power during faults, 10 kWh. The capacity of the hydrogen storage tank far exceeds the energy required by the system during faults, demonstrating that producing green hydrogen not only benefits the system economically but also ensures power supply during faults without conflict.
Scenario III: Adding a PV system enables the substation auxiliary system to achieve self-sufficiency through photovoltaic power generation. Excess photovoltaic energy can be used to produce green hydrogen, reducing the required grid power while significantly protecting the environment.
In all three scenarios, as the electric–hydrogen backup power microgrid becomes more complete, the total net present value cost gradually decreases. The total net present value cost in Scenario III is reduced by 46.55% compared to Scenario I and by 36.51% compared to Scenario II. This indicates that combining hydrogen storage and PV systems in the microgrid design not only optimizes battery capacity allocation and reduces overall costs but also achieves a win-win situation for environmental protection and economic benefits, and ensures long-term power supply for the substation auxiliary system in emergency situations.
In conclusion, microgrid application has significant advantages regarding environmental and economic benefits.
5.3. Microgrid Operation Analysis
This section analyzes the daily operation of the microgrid based on the optimal capacities (e.g., 13 kWh battery and 2836 kWh H2 tank) obtained in
Section 5.2. The final
and
are calculated as defined by Equations (11) and (12). This calculation results in an enforced battery SOC range of (0.769, 0.9), which is significantly higher than the physical limit of (0.2, 0.9), and a
range of (0.2, 0.8). With these specific operational constraints now defined, three typical days were chosen to simulate daily operations, as shown in
Figure 9.
During valley grid electricity price hours (23:00–7:00), the electrolyzer operates at full power to produce hydrogen as the revenue from hydrogen production exceeds the cost of purchasing electricity. During other periods, surplus photovoltaic energy is used to produce green hydrogen if it exceeds the starting power of the electrolyzer. Due to the limited capacity of the lithium batteries and the requirement to maintain sufficient minimum storage capacity for fault demand, they only provide a limited capacity for peak shaving.
Figure 10 shows the SOC and
results over a 10-day normal operation period. The dotted lines indicate the operational limits constrained by the fault backup requirements. The results confirm that both fall within these enforced ranges, with hydrogen being sold on the 10th day.
This strategy maintains lithium batteries at a lower Depth of Discharge (DoD), thereby reducing stress and enhancing durability and reliability of the battery cells [
35,
36]. It enables the system to withstand unexpected disruptions while optimizing the longevity and performance of the energy storage components.
5.4. Influence of Hydrogen Pricing
To further analyze the impact of hydrogen market price on the substation auxiliary system, a sensitivity analysis is provided in this section. The price of hydrogen at the hydrogen refueling station is set at 6.25 yuan/m
3, which establishes the upper limit for the microgrid’s selling price. Five hydrogen price levels are selected for economic calculation in the entire life cycle, as shown in
Figure 11.
The results suggest that as the hydrogen price increases, the total cost decreases while the hydrogen selling revenue increases. In particular, for every 0.5 yuan increase in hydrogen price, the net present value total cost decreases successively by 15.47%, 31.29%, 47.11%, and 62.94%. From an economic perspective, a higher hydrogen price results in greater benefits. However, from the perspective of the microgrid itself, the price of hydrogen should not be set too high to improve market competitiveness.
Based on the analysis of hydrogen production, storage, and transportation costs, a price of 5 yuan/m3 appears appropriate. Increasing the hydrogen price beyond this point is unlikely to yield substantial benefits. Furthermore, this price is lower than the market price, enhancing the feasibility of selling hydrogen to nearby refueling stations.
6. Conclusions
This paper introduces a microgrid for substation auxiliary systems, serving as a backup power source with a PV system, battery storage, and hydrogen storage, replacing traditional lead–acid battery or diesel generator approaches. According to calculations, for a 220 kV substation, the available rooftop area can be utilized to install 30 kW of PV panels. This improvement maximizes substation space with solar and hydrogen equipment, generating profits and cleaner energy. It also smooths electricity demand patterns and enables black start capability during faults.
Then, energy dispatch strategies for normal and fault scenarios were formulated for the microgrid, considering the startup power of electrolyzers and the startup time of fuel cells. Based on this, an optimization model for capacity configuration was established to simultaneously meet fault demand and daily operational needs. The process involves three key steps: Step 1 calculates the required HESS backup energy during a fault, Step 2 establishes the capacity configuration optimization model from an economic perspective, and Step 3 utilizes the PSO algorithm to solve the model and investigate parameter sensitivity.
The results indicate that for fault support alone, when the required support duration exceeds 7 h, using HESS is more cost-effective than relying solely on batteries. In particular, for support durations of 8 h and 10 h, the cost using HESS is 17.96% and 32.63% lower, respectively, compared to batteries. When considering daily operational economics, the proposed microgrid backup power system results in a 46.55% reduction in total net present value cost compared to a lithium battery-only system and a 36.51% reduction compared to a system with hydrogen storage but no PV. Under the proposed capacity constraints to ensure the required energy during faults, the SOC range for the battery during normal operation is restricted to (0.769, 0.9). This maintains a lower Depth of Discharge (DoD), enhancing durability of the battery cells. This design provides significant environmental benefits by producing green hydrogen and reducing grid power consumption, and it ensures long-term power supply reliability for substation auxiliary systems. Therefore, the microgrid application demonstrates clear advantages in both economic and environmental aspects.
Furthermore, by establishing the proposed microgrid at the substation, it is possible to integrate distributed energy sources scattered throughout cities, thereby enhancing the flexibility of the power system. Additionally, utilizing substations as hydrogen refueling stations offers significant advantages. These sites are not only widely distributed but, crucially, they are already staffed by professional maintenance personnel. This existing technical expertise in managing complex energy systems provides a strong foundation for safely overseeing the physical and cyber–physical security of new hydrogen infrastructure [
37]. Consequently, the configuration methods discussed in this paper hold significant potential for widespread application, as they are applicable to any substation equipped with auxiliary systems, with the configuration outcomes primarily influenced by the scale and safety requirements of the specific auxiliary system.