Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Control with a Fixed and Variable Roll, Pitch, and Yaw Axis on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Energy Consumption
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Investigation of a Low-Cogging-Torque and High-Torque-Density Double-Sided Permanent Magnet Motor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Improved Coordinated Control Strategy for Auxiliary Frequency Regulation of Gas–Steam Combined Cycle Units

1
Jiangsu Frontier Electric Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211102, China
2
National Engineering Research Center of Power Generation Control and Safety, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(22), 5997; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225997 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 3 November 2025 / Accepted: 13 November 2025 / Published: 15 November 2025

Abstract

With the increasing penetration of renewable energy, the frequency regulation burden on thermal power units is growing significantly. Among them, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) units are playing an increasingly important role in grid ancillary services due to their high efficiency and low emissions. This paper investigates coordinated control strategies to improve the auxiliary frequency regulation capability of CCGTs, addressing the limitations of traditional control approaches where gas turbines dominate while steam turbines respond passively. A decentralized model predictive control (MPC) strategy based on rate-limited signal decomposition is proposed to improve auxiliary frequency regulation. First, a dynamic model of the F-class CCGT systems oriented towards control is established. Then, predictive controllers are designed separately for the top and bottom cycles, with control accuracy improved through a fuzzy prediction model, Kalman filtering and state augmentation. Furthermore, a multi-scale decomposition method for AGC (Automatic Generation Control) signals is developed, separating the signals into load-following and high-frequency components, which are allocated to the gas and steam turbines respectively for coordinated response. Comparative simulations with a conventional MPC strategy demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves power tracking speed, stability, and overshoot control, with the IAE (Integral of Absolute Error) index reduced by 83.7%, showing strong potential for practical engineering applications.
Keywords: combined cycle; decentralized predictive control; rate-limited signal decomposition; auxiliary frequency regulation; coordinated control combined cycle; decentralized predictive control; rate-limited signal decomposition; auxiliary frequency regulation; coordinated control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xiao, X.; Sun, L.; Pan, L. Improved Coordinated Control Strategy for Auxiliary Frequency Regulation of Gas–Steam Combined Cycle Units. Energies 2025, 18, 5997. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225997

AMA Style

Hu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Xiao X, Sun L, Pan L. Improved Coordinated Control Strategy for Auxiliary Frequency Regulation of Gas–Steam Combined Cycle Units. Energies. 2025; 18(22):5997. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Zunmin, Yilin Zhang, Tianhai Zhang, Xinyu Xiao, Li Sun, and Lei Pan. 2025. "Improved Coordinated Control Strategy for Auxiliary Frequency Regulation of Gas–Steam Combined Cycle Units" Energies 18, no. 22: 5997. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225997

APA Style

Hu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T., Xiao, X., Sun, L., & Pan, L. (2025). Improved Coordinated Control Strategy for Auxiliary Frequency Regulation of Gas–Steam Combined Cycle Units. Energies, 18(22), 5997. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop