Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of a New Segmented Annular Ring Tube for Heat Transfer Enhancement in Solar Water Heating Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Agent-Based Coordinated Voltage Regulation Technique in an Unbalanced Distribution System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulations to Eliminate Backflow Power in an Isolated Three-Port Bidirectional DC–DC Converter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids

1
Department of Business Administration, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48547, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Data Science, Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727, Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-gu, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
3
Interdisciplinary Major of Ocean Renewable Energy Engineering, Korea Maritime & Ocean University, 727, Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-gu, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(21), 5830; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215830
Submission received: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 5 November 2025

1. Introduction

In recent years, renewable energy has become one of the most critical pillars for addressing the dual challenges of global energy shortages and environmental degradation. Among renewable sources, photovoltaic (PV) systems have gained particular attention for their sustainability, scalability, and zero on-site emissions [1,2,3,4].
The photovoltaic (PV) system converts sunlight directly into electricity through the photovoltaic effect, enabling clean energy generation without combustion or mechanical components [5,6]. Consequently, PV systems require minimal maintenance and exhibit long operating lifespans. However, their performance is strongly influenced by environmental factors such as irradiance and temperature, resulting in nonlinear current–voltage (I–V) and power–voltage (P–V) characteristics that complicate energy harvesting [7,8,9].
Recent studies have revealed that the goal of improving the conversion efficiency and methods of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) remains one of the main topics of research in modern PV systems [10,11,12,13]. Conventional MPPT techniques such as the perturb-and-observe (P&O) method and the incremental conductance (INC) method were the first techniques introduced in commercial inverters [14,15]. However, these methods suffer from oscillations and slow dynamic responses under partial shading (PS) conditions [16,17], and therefore hybrid and bio-inspired optimization algorithms, such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), ant colony optimization (ACO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO), have been developed to remedy these conditions [18,19,20,21].
A representative example is the hybrid Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) and P&O algorithm proposed for complex partial shading environments [22,23,24]. This hybrid model proved to be superior both in speed of tracking and in steady-state ripple losses compared with conventional MPPT schemes. Likewise, fuzzy logic and artificial neural network (ANN) controllers combined with incremental conductance and perturb-and-observe methods have proven more adaptive to the transient conditions of irradiance [25,26]. The comparative experiments undertaken using these adaptive controllers confirmed gains in energy harvesting of the order of 3–5% in distributed PV arrays [27,28].
On the level of converters, differential power processing (DPP) types and switched-capacitor–inductor (SCL) types have been developed to prevent the losses that arise from differences in the PV module output level [29,30,31]. Converter developments such as partial power processing converters (PPPCs) have enabled isolated module optimization and power decoupling [32,33,34]. Efficiencies exceeding 98% have been exhibited in various simulations, while a compact circuit design while maintaining a relatively simple control architecture [35,36]. Similar research has been reported in Energies journal [2,9], with reference to the subject of converter integration (simplified bidirectional DC–DC structures) where backflow power in isolated systems has been eliminated.
PV management on the microgrid scale has been revolutionized by advances in data analytics and monitoring associated with the IoT [12,37,38,39]. The use of real-time data from IoT sensors related to irradiance, temperature, and load is sent to cloud-based platforms for adaptive scheduling and fault identification. AI-based predictive methods have improved the accuracy of fault diagnosis by as much as 15–20% when compared with surrogate methods based on conventional thresholds [40,41,42].
Such systems have also been successfully employed in intelligent agricultural factories where interlinked servers manipulate environmental controls, irrigation, and lighting fed by IoT [3,43]. AI-supported decision management can support energy efficiency and safety in renewable energy infrastructures.
The convergence of converter-level innovation, intelligent control, and IoT-based adaptive management characterizes the technological basis of the new photovoltaic microgrid [44,45,46]. This basis supports the transition to cyber–physical PV ecosystems, leading to flexible, resilient and sustainable energy networks [47,48,49].

2. Review Papers

In recent articles, Thi Thu Em Vo et al. conducted one of the first reviews synthesizing floating photovoltaic (FPV) applications within the context of aquaculture and offshore industry, emphasizing structural design and adaptation to environmental conditions [4,5,50].
The cited reviews showed that the aim of FPV is to lower module temperature and evaporation and increase the energy yield when compared to land-based PV systems [51,52]. They also emphasize the importance of FPV for sustainable coastal economies and hybrid solar and tidal systems [4,5].
Subsequent studies extended these discussions to desert and inland aquaculture contexts. They found that FPV installations had the potential to achieve a balance between land and water use [6,19,20]. Recent techno-economic analyses showed that FPV deployment could result in a roughly 10–13% increase in annually generated energy while reducing evaporation loss from water reservoirs [21,22,23]. Environmental simulations showed that the cooling effect of the water surface improved the efficiency of solar PV modules and their longevity [24,25].
Nguyen and Bhattacharyya conducted design optimization assessments of mooring configuration, hydrodynamic stability, and energy production performance in large-scale FPV systems [26,27]. Their results indicated that optimized anchor angles and flexible mooring materials could improve energy capture by 2–4% for varying wind conditions [28,29]. Additional analyses focusing on renewable energy and applied energy indicated that lightweight composite materials reduce installation costs and environmental footprint [30,31,32]. Such results are consistent with previous analyses published in Energies journal on FPV–aquaculture integration, which also confirmed the mutual benefits of energy and ecological sustainability [4,5,6].
In addition, the incorporation of predictive maintenance and AI-based monitoring in FPV systems is perceived as an emergent trend. The possibility of real-time optimization of floating structures under variable conditions of weather and load is provided through smart sensors, edge computing, and data-based anomaly detection [33,34,35]. These innovations further reinforce the change of FPV systems into intelligent, self-learning, and eco-adaptive infrastructures aiding sustainable aquaculture and the development of an offshore industry.
Li et al. and Santos et al. surveyed AI-based MPPTs, which included comparative assessments of deep, fuzzy, and bio-inspired hybrid controller access in photovoltaic systems [36,37,38,39]. These meta-analyses concluded that intelligent controllers have higher performance compared to traditional algorithms in convergence speed, adaptability, and energy yield. The authors also compared the problems encountered in their hardware realization, including data generalization and the cross-platform application of learning-based controllers [12,40].
The importance of cybersecurity and privacy is rapidly expanding in distributed energy systems. In particular, recent studies emphasize privacy-preserving authentication, secure data-sharing protocols, and blockchain-based intrusion-detection paradigms as key elements of resilient AI-enabled energy systems [7,42,43,44,45,46].

3. Research Papers

The work presented by Muhammad Shahid Niazi et al. [2], “A Simple Mismatch Mitigating Partial Power Processing Converter for Solar PV Modules”, introduces a switched-capacitor–inductor (SCL)-based differential power processing (DPP) converter that was proven to be capable of minimizing the mismatch losses occurring in PV modules due to partial shadowing effects. Experimental results showed conversion efficiencies greater than 98% for this converter, indicating that it brings greater reliability and simplicity for use in high performance PV systems.
In a proposed study by Kyung-Yong Kim et al. [3], titled “Research on Crop Growing Factory: Focusing on Lighting and Environmental Control with Technological Proposal,” an IoT-based control framework was developed to control the lighting intensity, temperature, and humidity in plant factories. The proposed system achieved many advantages in terms of energy efficiency and operational stability, which validated its applicability for microgrid-based distributed energy management.
In the paper by Muhammad Annas Hafeez et al. [8], “A Novel Hybrid MPPT Technique Based on Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) and Perturb and Observe (P&O) under Partial and Complex Partial Shading Conditions”, the hybrid technique adopted blended classical and bio-inspired optimization techniques to obtain better results in tracking performance. The simulation results showed that the efficiency obtained by the HHO-P&O technique was 99.8% and the oscillations in the steady-state condition were almost negligible; their technique was considered to have the best performance compared to the existing MPPT PSO and ACS techniques.
In their study titled “Simulations for the Elimination of Back Flow Power in a Three-Port Isolated Bidirectional DC–DC Converter”, Norbert Njuanyi Koneh et al. [9] propose a modified dual phase-shift (DPS) control law to eliminate backflow power losses through the synchronized internal and external phase displacement angles. The simulation results confirm no backflow power losses and a close to 20% increase in efficiency, which represents a theoretical solution for stable power control in microgrids based on photovoltaic energy conversion.
These scholarly articles cover a wide variety of subjects related to the optimization of photovoltaic systems, converter design, efficient energy management, hybrid MPPT algorithms, and secure power conversion control. Collectively, they give empirical and simulation results for improving energy efficiency, system stability, and intelligent PV-integrated microgrids, hence providing valuable information towards improving renewable, intelligent, and sustainable energy technology.

4. Conclusions and Future Work

As the importance of sustainability in global society has been forging ahead in the wake of advances in artificial intelligence, renewable sources of energy, and digitalization, the application of intelligence in energy systems must be explored globally to achieve this goal. This special publication, “Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids”, showcases the latest advances in intelligent energy conversion, intelligent energy management, and secure means of communication technology, directly contributing to the development of modern energy systems.
In detail, the eight representative papers contained in this Special Issue give wide-ranging views of the different aspects of PV and microgrid research. They deal with converter-level efficiency optimization [2], IoT-based smart energy management [3], floating photovoltaic (FPV) applications for sustainable aquaculture and offshore systems [4,5], PV−aquaculture integration in desert environments [6], secure mechanisms for smart grid authentication [7], hybrid intelligent MPPT algorithms [8], and high-efficiency dual phase-shift (DPS) power conversion control [9]. Overall, such works present the technological advances required for the intelligent, secure, and efficient energy operation of microgrids in Industry 4.0.
This Special Issue provides a holistic overview of the MPPT methods used for PV systems employed in microgrid environments, in terms of principles, comparative performance, and applicability within the framework of Industry 4.0 energy management. To provide a complete view of these interconnected developments, the conceptual framework of the development of microgrid PV systems is illustrated in Figure 1 illustrates five important research dimensions that jointly enable intelligent, secure and sustainable energy management.
This Special Issue is not only concerned with increasing energy output or reducing costs, but rather emphasizes technologies that express the values of humanity, support the sustainable utilization of energy, and ensure for the safety and security of our systems. One of its aims is to demonstrate how each renewable energy technology can coexist with artificial intelligence and intelligent control to create clean and sustainable energy systems that will also be stable and reliable.
A total of eight academic contributions are published, including review papers and research papers. The continuation of this theme will be expanded in future Special Issues under the title “Intelligent Energy Systems and AI-Based Microgrid Optimization, Volume 2” comprising themes on new topics such as energy–data integration, secure decentralized power networks, artificial intelligence, ethical implications of energy systems, etc. The next volume will investigate the intelligent, adaptive and human-centered energy solutions aligned to global commercial objectives for sustainability, safety, and innovation in technology.

Author Contributions

Y.L. and J.-H.H. developed the ideas for this paper together. Y.L. took the lead on writing the first draft, with J.-H.H. providing critical feedback, revisions, and guidance throughout the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Special Issue: Survey of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV System in Micro-Grid. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies/special_issues/Microgrid_PV_System (accessed on 28 October 2025).
  2. Niazi, K.A.K.; Yang, Y.; Kerekes, T.; Sera, D. A Simple Mismatch Mitigating Partial Power Processing Converter for Solar PV Modules. Energies 2021, 14, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, K.-Y.; Huh, J.-H.; Ko, H.-J. Research on Crop Growing Factory: Focusing on Lighting and Environmental Control with Technological Proposal. Energies 2021, 14, 2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vo, T.T.E.; Ko, H.; Huh, J.-H.; Park, N. Overview of Solar Energy for Aquaculture: The Potential and Future Trends. Energies 2021, 14, 6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vo, T.T.E.; Ko, H.; Huh, J.; Park, N. Overview of Possibilities of Solar Floating Photovoltaic Systems in the Offshore Industry. Energies 2021, 14, 6988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vo, T.T.E.; Je, S.-M.; Jung, S.-H.; Choi, J.; Huh, J.-H.; Ko, H.-J. Review of Photovoltaic Power and Aquaculture in Desert. Energies 2022, 15, 3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Je, S.-M.; Woo, H.; Choi, J.; Jung, S.-H.; Huh, J.-H. A Research Trend on Anonymous Signature and Authentication Methods for Privacy Invasion Preventability on Smart Grid and Power Plant Environments. Energies 2022, 15, 4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hafeez, M.A.; Naeem, A.; Akram, M.; Javed, M.Y.; Asghar, A.B.; Wang, Y. A Novel Hybrid MPPT Technique Based on Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) and Perturb and Observer (P&O) under Partial and Complex Partial Shading Conditions. Energies 2022, 15, 5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koneh, N.N.; Ko, J.-S.; Kim, D.-K. Simulations to Eliminate Backflow Power in an Isolated Three-Port Bidirectional DC–DC Converter. Energies 2023, 16, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esram, T.; Chapman, P.L. Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2007, 22, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hohm, D.P.; Ropp, M.E. Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms. Prog. Photovolt Res. Appl. 2003, 11, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Subudhi, B.; Pradhan, R. A Comparative Study on Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 4, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Femia, N.; Petrone, G.; Spagnuolo, G.; Vitelli, M. Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Method. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2005, 20, 963–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, F.; Duan, S.; Liu, F.; Liu, B.; Kang, Y. A Variable Step Size INC MPPT Method for PV Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2008, 55, 2622–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hussein, K.H.; Muta, I.; Hoshino, T.; Osakada, M. Maximum photovoltaic power tracking: An algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. IEE Proc.—Gener. Transm. Distrib. (IET) 1995, 142, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shenoy, P.S.; Kim, K.A.; Johnson, B.B.; Krein, P.T. Differential Power Processing for Increased Energy Production and Reliability of Photovoltaic Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 2968–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shenoy, P.S.; Krein, P.T. Differential power processing for DC systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 1795–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Güngör, V.C.; Sahin, D.; Kocak, T.; Ergut, S.; Buccella, C.; Cecati, C.; Hancke, G.P. Smart Grid Technologies: Communication Technologies and Standards. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 2011, 7, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zanella, A.; Bui, N.; Castellani, A.; Vangelista, L.; Zorzi, M. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andoni, M.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Abram, S.; Geach, D.; Jenkins, D.; McCallum, P.; Peacock, A. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 100, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aitzhan, N.Z.; Svetinovic, D. Security and Privacy in Decentralized Energy Trading Through Multi-Signatures, Blockchain, and Anonymous Messaging Streams. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2018, 15, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sahu, A.; Yadav, N.; Sudhakar, K. Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ramanan, C.J.; Lim, K.H.; Kurnia, J.C.; Roy, S.; Bora, B.J.; Medhi, B.J. Towards sustainable power generation: Recent advancements in floating photovoltaic technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 194, 114322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Farrar, L.W.; Bahaj, A.S.; James, P.; Anwar, A.; Amdar, N. Floating solar PV to reduce water evaporation in water stressed regions and powering water pumping: Case study Jordan. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 260, 115598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benjamins, S.; Williamson, B.; Billing, S.-L.; Yuan, Z.; Collu, M.; Fox, C.; Hobbs, L.; Masden, E.A.; Cottier-Cook, E.J.; Wilson, B. Potential environmental impacts of floating solar photovoltaic systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 199, 114463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Faruqui, M.F.I.; Jawad, A.; Masood, N.-A. Techno-economic assessment of power generation potential from floating solar photovoltaic systems in Bangladesh. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramanan, C.J.; Lim, K.H.; Kurnia, J.C.; Roy, S.; Bora, B.J.; Medhi, B.J. Design study on the parameters influencing the performance of floating solar PV. Renew. Energy 2024, 223, 120064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahaman, M.A.; Chambers, T.L.; Fekih, A.; Wiecheteck, G.; Carranza, G.; Possetti, G.R.C. Floating photovoltaic module temperature estimation: Modeling and comparison. Renew. Energy 2023, 208, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, G.; Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; Hou, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J. Hydrodynamic analysis of floating photovoltaic system constrained with rigid connectors. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 29920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Woolway, R.I.; Zhao, G.; Rocha, S.M.G.; Thackeray, S.J.; Armstrong, A. Decarbonization potential of floating solar photovoltaics on lakes worldwide. Nat. Water 2024, 2, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, M.; Raza, M.A.; Faheem, M.; Sarang, S.A.; Panhwar, M.; Jumani, T.A. Conventional and artificial intelligence based maximum power point tracking techniques for efficient solar power generation. Eng. Rep. 2024, 6, e12963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kermadi, M.; Berkouk, E.M. Artificial intelligence-based maximum power point tracking controllers for photovoltaic systems: Comparative study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ram, J.P.; Babu, T.S.; Rajasekar, N. A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 826–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kofinas, P.; Doltsinis, S.; Dounis, A.I.; Vouros, G.A. A reinforcement learning approach for MPPT control method of photovoltaic sources. Renew. Energy 2017, 108, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Avila, L.O.; De Paula, M.; Trimboli, M.; Carlucho, I. Deep reinforcement learning approach for MPPT control of partially shaded PV systems in Smart Grids. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 97, 106711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jing, W.; Lai, C.H.; Wong, S.H.W.; Wong, M.L.D. Battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system in standalone DC microgrids: A review. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2017, 11, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jacob, A.S.; Banerjee, R.; Ghosh, P.C. Sizing of hybrid energy storage system for a PV-based microgrid through design-space approach. Appl. Energy 2018, 212, 640–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. do Amaral, J.V.S.; dos Santos, C.H.; Montevechi, J.A.B.; de Queiroz, A.R. Energy Digital Twin applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 188, 113891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ilgen, K.; Schindler, D.; Wieland, S.; Lange, J. The impact of floating photovoltaic power plants on lake water temperature and stratification. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, B.; Zhu, T.; Wang, J.; Shu, H.; Yu, T.; Zhang, X.; Yao, W.; Sun, L. Comprehensive overview of maximum power point tracking algorithms of PV systems under partial shading condition. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 121983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nisar, H.; Janjua, A.K.; Hafeez, H.; Shakir, S.; Shahzad, N.; Waqas, A. Thermal and electrical performance of solar floating PV system compared to on-ground PV system—An experimental investigation. Sol. Energy 2022, 241, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Z.; Rath, S.; Xu, J.; Xiao, T. Federated Learning for Smart Grid: A Survey on Applications and Potential Vulnerabilities. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.10764. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou, K.; Fu, C.; Yang, S. Big data driven smart energy management: From system architecture to data analytics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Egunjobi, O.O.; Gomes, A.; Egwim, C.N.; Morais, H. A systematic review of blockchain for energy applications. e-Prime—Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2024, 9, 100751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, Y.-N.; Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wu, Q.; Liang, H. Blockchain-empowered security and privacy protection technologies for smart grid. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2023, 85, 103708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pop, C.; Cioara, T.; Antal, M.; Anghel, I.; Salomie, I.; Bertoncini, M. Blockchain based decentralized management of demand response programs in smart energy grids. Sensors 2018, 18, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaur, H.; Alam, M.A.; Jameel, R.; Mourya, A.K.; Chang, V. A proposed solution and future direction for blockchain-based heterogeneous medicare data in cloud environment. J. Med. Syst. 2018, 42, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, H.; Song, M.; Wang, Y. Does AI-infused operations capability enhance or impede the relationship between information technology capability and firm performance? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 191, 122517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shiradkar, S.; Sharma, R.; Choudhary, D.; Venkateswaran, J.; Kumar, P.; Solanki, C. Can community based solar energy initiatives deliver on women’s empowerment in India? Evidence from rural Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh. Energy Res. Soc. Social Sci. 2024, 110, 103225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, J.; Liang, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, F.; Wu, Q. Online coal consumption characteristics fitting for daily economic dispatch using a data-driven hybrid sequential model. Appl. Energy 2023, 341, 121127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Möslinger, M.; Ulpiani, G.; Vetters, N. Circular economy and waste management to empower a climate-neutral urban future. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 421, 138454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koondhar, M.A.; Albasha, L.; Mahariq, I.; Graba, B.B.; Touti, E. Reviewing floating photovoltaic (FPV) technology for solar-power generation: Energy-yield benefits and module-cooling advantages. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2024, 54, 101449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework for the development of microgrid photovoltaic (PV) systems.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework for the development of microgrid photovoltaic (PV) systems.
Energies 18 05830 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Huh, J.-H. Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids. Energies 2025, 18, 5830. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215830

AMA Style

Liu Y, Huh J-H. Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids. Energies. 2025; 18(21):5830. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yuanyuan, and Jun-Ho Huh. 2025. "Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids" Energies 18, no. 21: 5830. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215830

APA Style

Liu, Y., & Huh, J.-H. (2025). Editorial of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods for PV Systems in Micro-Grids. Energies, 18(21), 5830. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop