Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Reductions in NOx Emissions, Combustion Instability, and Efficiency Loss in a Lean-Burn CHP Engine via Hydrogen-Enriched Natural Gas
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Shipboard Motor Failure Monitoring Technology: Multi-Physics Field Mechanism Modeling and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance System Integration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Mechanism, Modeling and Challenges of Geological Storage of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

1
College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
College of Carbon Metrology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology—Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(16), 4338; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164338
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 9 August 2025 / Accepted: 13 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section B: Energy and Environment)

Abstract

CO2 geological storage (CGS) is critical for mitigating emissions in hard-to-abate industries under carbon neutrality. However, its implementation faces significant challenges. This paper examines CO2-trapping mechanisms and proposes key safety measures: the continuous monitoring of in situ CO2 migration and formation pressure dynamics to prevent remobilization, and pre-injection lithological analysis to assess mineral trapping potential. CO2 injection alters reservoir stresses, inducing surface deformation; understanding long-term rock mechanics (creep, damage) is paramount. Thermomechanical effects from supercritical CO2 injection pose risks to caprock integrity and fault reactivation, necessitating comprehensive, multi-scale, real-time monitoring for leakage detection. Geostatistical analysis of well log and seismic data enables realistic subsurface characterization, improving numerical model accuracy for risk assessment. This review synthesizes current CGS knowledge, analyzes technical challenges, and aims to inform future site selection, operations, and monitoring strategies.
Keywords: CO2 geological storage; trapping mechanisms; surrounding rock deterioration; CGS simulation methods; in-site monitoring CO2 geological storage; trapping mechanisms; surrounding rock deterioration; CGS simulation methods; in-site monitoring

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Jin, K.; Zhao, W.; Ding, L.; Zhang, J.; Xu, D. Mechanism, Modeling and Challenges of Geological Storage of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Energies 2025, 18, 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164338

AMA Style

Wang S, Jin K, Zhao W, Ding L, Zhang J, Xu D. Mechanism, Modeling and Challenges of Geological Storage of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Energies. 2025; 18(16):4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shun, Kan Jin, Wei Zhao, Luojia Ding, Jingning Zhang, and Di Xu. 2025. "Mechanism, Modeling and Challenges of Geological Storage of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide" Energies 18, no. 16: 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164338

APA Style

Wang, S., Jin, K., Zhao, W., Ding, L., Zhang, J., & Xu, D. (2025). Mechanism, Modeling and Challenges of Geological Storage of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Energies, 18(16), 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop