Structure and Electrochemical Behavior of ZnLaFeO₄ Alloy as a Negative Electrode in Ni-MH Batteries

Abstract

This study focuses on the structural and electrochemical behavior of the compound ZnLaFeO₄ as a negative electrode material for nickel–metal hydride (Ni-MH) batteries. The material was synthesized by a sol–gel hydrothermal method to assess the influence of lanthanum doping on the ZnFe₂O₄ spinel structure. X-ray diffraction revealed the formation of a dominant LaFeO₃ perovskite phase, with ZnFe₂O₄ and La₂O₃ as secondary phases. SEM analysis showed agglomerated grains with an irregular morphology. Electrochemical characterization at room temperature and a discharge rate of C/10 (full charge in 10 h) revealed a maximum discharge capacity of 106 mAhg⁻¹. Although La³⁺ doping modified the microstructure and slowed the activation process, the electrode exhibited stable cycling with moderate polarization behavior. The decrease in capacity during cycling is due mainly to higher internal resistance. These results highlight the potential and limitations of La-doped spinel ferrites as alternative negative electrodes for Ni-MH systems.

1. Introduction

Recently, mobile tools have become one of the most significant sources of pollution, consuming nearly half of the world’s oil production and accounting for a quarter of global CO₂ emissions [1,2,3]. This dramatic increase in oil resource depletion, coupled with the growing environmental awareness, has created an urgent need to develop a new model of energy-efficient and eco-friendly vehicles, such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs) [4,5]. The key challenge in the development of EVs and HEVs lies in battery performance [6]. As a solution, lithium-ion (Li-ion) and nickel–metal hydride (Ni-MH) batteries have emerged as the most critical onboard energy storage systems for these vehicles [7]. While lithium batteries offer the highest energy density, their low thermal stability presents significant safety concerns, particularly in the transportation sector [8,9]. On the other hand, Ni-MH batteries are widely used to reduce CO₂ emissions in transportation due to their high energy density, ease of application in series, series/parallel configurations, safe charge and discharge processes, tolerance to overcharge and over-discharge, excellent thermal properties, and the use of environmentally acceptable and recyclable materials [10,11,12,13,14,15,16].

However, the battery performance is influenced by the intrinsic properties of the electrode materials. In Ni-MH batteries, the negative electrode acts as a hydrogen-absorbing material, where hydrogen is reversibly inserted and released during the charging and discharging processes. During charging, hydrogen is stored in the form of metal hydrides (MHₓ), and during discharging, it is released in the form of hydrogen ions that participate in the redox reaction with the positive electrode. Various metal compounds with high discharge capacities, such as AB₅ [17,18,19], AB₂ [20], AB₃ [21], AB [22], and A₂B [23], have been studied since the invention of Ni-MH batteries. Despite their promising properties, these compounds are often expensive and difficult to produce, which limits their performance and viability in commercial applications. As a solution, oxide-based ABO₃ compounds (e.g., perovskite alloys) have been investigated and developed as alternatives to the intermetallic alloys used in Ni-MH batteries [24,25,26]. However, one of the primary challenges in advancing this technology is the limited operating temperature range for effective hydrogen absorption; to overcome this challenge, ceramic oxide nanomaterials, including ferrites, have attracted the interest of the research community because of their distinctive crystal structures and magnetic characteristics [27,28,29]. These nanomaterials can be classified into three main types: hexaferrites, spinel ferrites, and garnets. In fact, nano-sized spinel ferrites having the chemical formula AB₂O₄, where A and B occupy the tetrahedral and octahedral cation sites, respectively, are the most widely utilized, due to their fascinating structural characteristics and outstanding electrical and magnetic properties [30,31,32]. This nanomaterial is extensively used in a wide range of applications, such as microwave and magnetic devices [33,34], wastewater treatment [35], sensors [36], targeted drug delivery [37], anticorrosion pigments [38,39], and optoelectronic systems [40]. It has also demonstrated a promising performance as an anode material in both lithium-ion [41,42] and sodium-ion batteries [43].

Given that the properties of nano-ferrites are highly dependent on the synthesis method, several techniques (e.g., co-precipitation [44], thermal decomposition [45], solvothermal methods [46], the sol–gel technique [47,48], etc.) were explored in previous studies, to prepare spinel ferrites. Among these, the sol–gel technique stands out for offering excellent textural characteristics, high chemical homogeneity, good crystallinity, and high purity of the final product [49].

These results have motivated research into the use of this type of nanomaterial as an electrode material in Ni-MH batteries. For instance, Wissem et al. [50] synthesized zinc spinel ferrites (ZnFe₂O₄) using the sol–gel method and investigated them as innovative anode materials in Ni-MH batteries. The performed electrochemical characterization revealed the excellent discharge capacity (up to 145 mAh/g) and high stability during cycling.

In complementary studies [51], substitution of the A site (Zn²⁺) with rare-earth cations such as Sm³⁺ in the Zn_xSm_1−xFe₂O₄ system also led to interesting results, highlighting the potential of cation substitution to enhance the electrochemical properties of spinel ferrites.

Based on these results, we propose a new approach based on B-site substitution in the spinel structure, where Fe³⁺ is partially replaced by La³⁺ to form the doped compound ZnLaFeO₄. This substitution is expected to modify the structure and improve electrochemical behavior by enhancing hydrogen diffusion and electrode stability.

This work aims to investigate the structural, morphological, and electrochemical characteristics of ZnLaFeO₄ as an innovative negative electrode material used in Ni-MH batteries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Method Applied to Synthesize the Alloys

The ZnLaFeO₄ powders were synthesized using a sol–gel hydrothermal process, employing stoichiometric quantities of high-purity metal nitrates: zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, 99.9% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), iron nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O, ≥99.95% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate (La(NO₃)₃·6H₂O, 99.999% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). These precursors were dissolved in demineralized water at room temperature, along with citric acid, to form a homogeneous solution. Ethylene glycol was then added to the solution under continuous stirring. After eight hours of agitation, the resulting gel was dried to remove water. Subsequently, it was ground into a fine powder. Finally, the powders were placed in the oven at 900 °C for 12 h to be calcined.

2.2. Characterization Methods

A Siemens X-ray diffractometer with Ni-filtered copper radiation (λ = 1.5404 Å) was used to obtain the X-ray diffraction data of the powders at room temperature. Then, the surface morphology of the alloy powder was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

2.3. Electrochemical Characterization

The negative electrodes were prepared applying latex technology [52,53], which consisted of mixing 90% target compound with 5% carbon black and 5% polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The resulting latex was later dried under a vacuum at room temperature for 24 h. Two pieces of the dried latex were pressed onto each side of a nickel grid, which served as the current collector. Electrochemical measurements were conducted at room temperature in a three-electrode cell, where the coiled nickel wire, the Hg/HgO electrode and the prepared hydride negative electrode were used as auxiliary, reference and working electrodes, respectively. A concentrated potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution (6 M) was used as the electrolyte. The negative hydride electrode was characterized by various electrochemical methods utilizing an EC-Lab potentiostat–galvanostat. All measurements were performed at a C/10 rate. Chronopotentiometry was employed to evaluate the cycling properties, including the activation of the negative electrode, maximum electrochemical capacity, and polarization. This technique involves applying a constant current between the working and auxiliary electrodes while monitoring the potential change over time during a series of cycles [54] and potentiodynamic polarization, which involves applying a potential E on the LaZnFe₂O₄ negative electrode and varying it linearly with time at a slew rate of v = 1 mVs⁻¹.

3. Results

3.1. SEM Observations

Figure 1 displays scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showcasing the microstructures of ZnLaFeO₄ spinel ferrites.

The micrographs of the ZnLaFeO₄ alloys show substantial particle agglomeration, which hinders the accurate determination of grain sizes through SEM analysis.

3.2. Structural Properties

The X-ray diffractograms were refined by applying the Rietveld method, drawing from the Pearson crystal structure library and using the Maud program, as illustrated in Figure 2. This technique involves fitting the calculated diffraction pattern as closely as possible to the measured data, which allowed for identifying phases within the examined powder and determining their mass proportions and lattice parameters.

The analysis of the X-ray diffraction pattern of the ZnLaFeO₄ sample reveals a complex composition comprising three main phases: LaFeO₃ (54.88%), La₂O₃ (33.23%), and ZnFe₂O₄ (11.89%). The predominance of LaFeO₃ suggests a strong reaction between lanthanum (La) and iron (Fe) during the preparation of the sample. However, the presence of La₂O₃ and ZnFe₂O₄ phases indicates an incomplete reaction, due to the uneven distribution of elements, which prevented the full formation of LaFeO₃.

In their study, Chaudhary et al. [55] observed the formation of an ortho-ferrite phase. Similarly, Angari et al. [56] noticed that the characteristic peaks corresponding to the LaFeO₃ phase became progressively more pronounced as the concentration of La ions increased in the NiFe₂O₄ spinel ferrite. This observation suggests that La cations did not easily form a solid solution with the spinel ferrite, likely due to the limited solubility of La ions or their incorporation into the spinel lattice. Indeed, at high dopant concentrations (La³⁺), only a small fraction of La³⁺ cations were substituted into the spinel lattice, while the excess cations accumulated at the grain boundaries, resulting in the formation of the orthoferrite LaFeO₃ phase [57,58,59].

The average crystallite size $D$ of the lanthanum-doped Zn-ferrite was determined using two techniques: the Debye–Scherrer method and the Williamson–Hall method were employed to calculate the crystallite size by applying the following formula:

$$D={\displaystyle \frac{k\mathsf{\lambda }}{\beta \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\theta }}$$

(1)

where k is Scherrer’s constant, k = 0.9; $\theta$ (radian) denotes Bragg’s angle; λ represents the wavelength of the radiation CoKα; and $\beta$ (radian) designates the half-height width of the peaks.

The Scherrer method assumes the isotropy of the crystallites, by attributing the broadening of diffraction peaks solely to the crystallite size, while neglecting significant microstructural characteristics such as crystallographic defects or stress-induced distortions. In contrast, the Williamson–Hall method offers a more comprehensive analysis by considering that the broadening of diffraction peaks results from a combination of factors, including both the crystallite size and the micro-strain (crystallographic defects). The Williamson–Hall equation is written as follows:

$$\beta \cos \theta ={\displaystyle \frac{k\mathsf{\lambda }}{D}}+4\epsilon \sin \theta$$

(2)

The crystallite size can be determined using the intercept and slope of the linear fit from the plotted curve $\beta \cos \left(\theta \right)=f(4\sin \left(\theta \right))$.

Figure 3 represents the Williamson–Hall diagrams of the ZnLaFeO₄ compound.

Table 1. Crystallographic parameters obtained by Rietveld refinement of the powders and the average crystallite sizes obtained by the two methods.

Sample	Phases Found	Lattice Parameters (Å)	Abundance of Phase (wt%)	Crystallite Size Ds (nm)	Crystallite Size DW-H (nm)	Sig	Fit Parameters
ZnLaFeO4	LaFeO3	a = 5.562 b = 7.841 c = 5.549	54.88	36.45	54.32	1.8	Rwp = 6.11; Rb = 5.77 Rexp = 5.36
	La2O3	a = 3.956 c = 6.137	33.23
	ZnFe2O4	a = 8.439	11.89

presents the crystallographic details of the powders determined by Rietveld refinement analysis, including lattice parameters, phase composition, and crystallite size. The latter was measured using two different methods.

3.3. Cycling Properties of the ZnLaFeO₄ Electrode Using the Galvanostatic Method

3.3.1. Activation Process of the ZnLaFeO₄ Electrode

The alloy activation during electrochemical cycling is mainly determined by its maximum discharge capacity, low electrode polarization, and stable half-discharge potential. It worth noting that some compounds activate after the first cycle, while others may require several cycles to achieve full activation.

Figure 4 shows the evolution of the discharge potential as a function of the electrochemical capacity variation in the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode during the initial activation cycles in a 6 M KOH electrolyte at a C/10 rate.

The experimental results indicate that the substitution of lanthanum into the spinel structure significantly influenced the electrode’s activation process. The later was slowed by the electrode’s low cyclability and was only achieved after 46 cycles, with the maximum discharge capacity reaching approximately 106 mAh/g. Zayani et al. [51] systematically investigated the trivalent cation substitution in sol–gel-synthesized ZnFe₂O₄, revealing a strong correlation between Sm³⁺ substitution levels on the A-site of the spinel ZnFe₂O₄ and electrode activation kinetics. Their work demonstrated that higher Sm³⁺ doping concentrations progressively hindered the activation process. In case of high-rate substitution of La (another trivalent cation) for Fe in ZnFe₂O₄, excess La ions are partially incorporated into the spinel structure and interact with Fe, resulting in the formation of LaFeO₃ at the grain boundaries. This phenomena created a thin insulating layer around the grains, which introduced additional resistance to the charge transfer process.

To assess the reversibility of the hydrogen absorption/desorption reactions, the polarization parameter, which is the difference between the half-charge and half-discharge potentials during electrochemical cycling, was introduced This parameter can be expressed using the following equation:

$$∆\mathrm{E}={\mathrm{E}}_{1/2} \mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}-{\mathrm{E}}_{1/2} \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}$$

(3)

Figure 5 illustrates the evolution of the half-charge/half-discharge potentials as a function of number of cycles and the polarization curve for the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode.

During the first cycle before activation, the half-discharge potential of the electrode shifted to less positive values, impeding the insertion of hydrogen into the interstitial sites of the electrode. As the activation cycle progressed, the half-discharge potential became more positive, facilitating hydrogen insertion into the electrode. Initially, the polarization values varied between approximately 663 and 817 mV. This value gradually decreased to 99 mV at the activation cycle before being stabilized during the subsequent cycles. These results are consistent with the electrochemical discharge capacity data, suggesting that the hydrogen absorption/desorption reactions at the sites became more reversible during the activation cycle.

3.3.2. Cycling Properties of the ZnLaFeO₄ Electrode

Figure 6 shows the evolution of the electrochemical discharge capacity as a function of the number of cycles of the ZnLaFeO₄ negative electrode.

The specific discharge capacity showed a progressive increase throughout the activation cycles, reaching a maximum value of 106 mAh·g⁻¹, as illustrated in Figure 6. While this value remains lower than that of certain oxide-based materials such as ZnFe₂O₄ (145 mAh·g⁻¹) [50] and intermetallic compounds like LaNi₅, it still outperforms several conventional hydride materials, Ti_2−xZr_xNi (102 mAh·g⁻¹) [60]. This demonstrates the promising balance between performance and stability offered by the La-substituted ZnLaFeO₄.

3.3.3. Electrode Degradation Process

After several charge/discharge cycles, a decrease in capacity was commonly observed in most studied electrodes. This decrease can be explained by the first-order degradation kinetics, used to calculate the degradation rate ($K_{deg})$. This parameter provides information about the stability of the electrochemical discharge capacity as a function of the number of cycles.

The discharge capacity ($Q_{dich,N}$) and the concentration of the active material in the electrode are directly correlated with first-order degradation kinetics. This can be expressed as the following relationship:

$$Q_{dich,N}=Q_0\exp (-K_{deg} N)$$

(4)

$${logQ}_{dich,N}={logQ}_0-0.434\exp K_{deg} N$$

(5)

where Q₀ represents the maximum capacity (mAhg⁻¹), while $K_{deg}$ denotes the degradation constant of the hydride material at a specific charge/discharge rate. This constant was derived from the slope of the linear part of the curve log(Q) = f(N), similarly to a first-order kinetic rate constant.

The following formula can be used to express the deterioration rate ($K_{deg}$), which is directly proportional to the corrosion rate ($r_{corr}$):

$$r_{corr}=K_{deg}{C}_M$$

(6)

Figure 7 illustrates the dependence of ${logQ}_{dich,N}$ on the number of cycles, showing the capacity degradation curve of the negative electrode.

The maximum discharge capacity (Q_disch,max), the capacity at the 80th cycle (Q₈₀), the retained discharge capacity (R80(%)), as well as the hydrogenation and corrosion characteristics obtained from the capacity fade curve are among the distinctive parameters summarized in

Table 2. Degradation parameters derived from the capacity fade curve.

Material	Nmax	Qdisch,max (mAh/g)	Qdich80 (mAh/g)	R80 (%)	$\frac{\partial \mathbf{l}\mathbf{o}\mathbf{g}{\mathbf{Q}}_{\mathbf{d}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{s}\mathbf{c}\mathbf{h}}}{\partial \mathbf{N}}$	K (cycle−1)	CM (g·cm−3)	rcorr (g·cm−3·cycle−1)
ZnLaFeO4	46	106	74	69.81	−0.00495	0.01140	2.028	0.02311

.

It was noted that, after activation, the discharge capacity decreases with cycling, primarily due to the oxidation of the active surface. According to Pan et al. [61], the interactions of the working electrode with the electrolyte lead to the deterioration of the negative electrode material, which results in the decrease in the discharge capacity. The formation of corrosive byproducts, including iron (Fe) deposits that accumulate on the surface of the alloy, can be linked to this loss of capacity. It was also observed that the overall performance of the electrode was reduced because of the existence of these deposits, which drastically minimized the active surface area accessible to the hydrogen absorption.

Various approaches were examined in previous studies to minimize the degradation rates. Indeed, Dymek et al. [62] investigated the degradation mechanisms of a La_1.5Mg_0.5Ni_6.5Co_0.5 electrode coated with amorphous nickel. The obtained results showed that the nickel coating considerably reduced the deterioration of the electrode, most likely by acting as a barrier to prevent corrosion and mechanical wear. In a similar aim, Bala et al. [63] focused on the efficacy of encasing electrodes in Ni-P coatings to improve the durability and minimize the deterioration. Another study’s experimental results showed a significant decrease in the degradation with increasing Mn substitution levels, thereby enhancing structural stability and corrosion resistance, which consequently prolonged the electrode’s lifetime and improved its cycling performance. The above-stated research works demonstrated the important role of surface alterations and material substitution techniques in reducing the deterioration of the electrode used in electrochemical applications.

SEM micrographs obtained after cycling are shown in Figure 8. A comparative SEM analysis was carried out between ZnFe₂O₄ and La-doped ZnLaFe₂O₄ after electrochemical cycling. SEM micrographs highlight marked morphological differences between the ZnFe₂O₄ and ZnLaFe₂O₄ samples, resulting from lanthanum incorporation.

The ZnFe₂O₄ sample features a compact, dense microstructure composed of strongly agglomerated micrometric grains interspersed with cracks attributable to thermomechanical stresses. Its homogeneous, low-porosity surface is characteristic of a material that has undergone high-temperature sintering or calcination.

Conversely, lanthanum doping ZnLaFe₂O₄ leads to a nanostructured, porous morphology, where quasi-spherical particles are irregularly dispersed. This transition to a finer, less agglomerated structure suggests that the La³⁺ ion disrupts crystal growth, probably due to its higher ionic radius than that of Fe³⁺, inducing lattice distortions and limiting grain coalescence.

3.3.4. Kinetic Parameters of the ZnLaFeO₄ Negative Electrode

Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves are commonly employed by researchers to determine the electrochemical discharge capacity based on the duration of each discharge cycle. However, Henryk Bala et al. [64] introduced innovative methods to determine some kinetic parameters, such as the equilibrium potential and the exchange current density. Their approach involves simplifying all interfacial processes between the negative electrode and electrolyte during charging and discharging to the H₂O/H₂ system.

The equilibrium potential (E^eq_H2O/H2) can be determined by applying the following formula [65,66].

$$E_{H2O/H_2}^{eq}={\displaystyle \frac{E^{(i+)}+E^{(i-)}-blog\left(\frac{\left|i_c\right|}{i_a}\right)}{2}}$$

(7)

If |i_c| = ia, Equation (2) was simplified to represent the midpoint of the potential jump (ΔE), resulting in the following equation:

$${\displaystyle \frac{{\mathrm{E}}^{(\mathrm{i}+)}+{\mathrm{E}}^{(\mathrm{i}-)}}{2}}$$

(8)

The potentials E⁽ⁱ⁺⁾ and E⁽ⁱ⁻⁾ correspond to the start of the charge and the end of the discharge, respectively. The Tafel slope of the straight lines on both sides (cathodic and anodic) of the hydrogen electrode is represented by b, while i_charge and i_discharge are the charge and discharge currents applied between the working electrode and the auxiliary electrode, respectively.

Figure 9 illustrates the variation in the equilibrium potential for the H₂O/H₂ system as a function of the number of cycles for the ZnLaFeO₄ negative electrode.

As shown in Figure 9, the equilibrium potential of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode declines gradually with the increase in the number charge/discharge cycles. During the initial cycles, the potential shifts towards more negative values. As the number of cycles increases, the equilibrium potential gradually turns towards more positive values, resulting in a value of −0.827 V at the end of the cycling process.

The obtained findings reveal that the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode underwent an initial activation or modification, followed by a stabilization phase. Clearly, the performance and potential of the electrode were influenced by changes in its electrochemical properties or structure during cycling.

3.4. Redox Properties of the Electrode ZnLaFeO₄ Studied by the Potentiodynamic Method

During electrochemical cycling, the ZnLaFeO₄ negative electrode cycling was studied by determining voltammograms, I = f(E), using the linear voltammetry technique. Using the first Stern method and origin software, the Tafel polarization curves were drawn using the obtained voltammograms.

Figure 10 shows the progression of both experimental and theoretical Tafel curves for ZnLaFeO₄ negative electrodes during cycling.

As illustrated in Figure 10, the Tafel polarization curves of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode exhibit minimal variation during the initial cycles, indicating stable electrochemical behavior. However, a distinct shift appears around the 46th activation cycle, with the curves moving toward more positive potential values. This change suggests that the activation process improves the electrode’s ability to facilitate hydrogen insertion, likely due to increased surface activity and a greater number of active sites. After this activation process, the Tafel curves gradually shift back toward less positive potential values, indicating a reduction in hydrogen insertion efficiency. This behavior may be attributed to a decline in surface reactivity or a partial saturation of active sites, which makes hydrogen incorporation more difficult.

Adjusting the theoretical Butler–Volmer equation to the Tafel polarization curves allowed for determining the redox variables, such as the current density and the Nernst potential [67].

Figure 11 depicts the progress of the Nernst potential (E0) as the ZnLaFeO4 electrode underwent multiple charge/discharge cycles.

It was observed that the Nernst potential of the electrode increased as the activation cycles of the electrode increased during the activation cycle and shifted toward less negative values. It reached its maximum value on the 40th cycle, which is attributed to the fast insertion of hydrogen into the electrodes, especially during the activation process. After this activation phase, the Nernst potential shifted to more negative values, indicating that hydrogen insertion became more difficult due to the deterioration of the active material through oxidation [51].

Figure 12 demonstrates the variation in the exchange current density I₀ as a function of the number of cycles of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode.

As shown in Figure 12, during cycling, the exchange current density of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode shows the same evolution as the electrochemical discharge capacity. As the activation cycles proceeded, the exchange current density of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode increased and reached its highest values. This rise can be explained by the improved hydrogen adsorption occurring at the electrode–electrolyte interface during cycling. However, achieving the maximum value required more cycles because the LaFeO₃ phase, which appeared at the grain boundaries, had poor intrinsic conductivity.

It was also noted that the current density of the ZnLaFeO₄ electrode decreased due to corrosion after activation, which resulted in fewer interstitial sites available for hydrogen insertion.

4. Conclusions

Due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, the sol–gel method was used to synthesize the ZnLaFeO₄ compound.

Structural analysis revealed a multiphase composition in the synthesized ZnLaFeO₄ material, consisting of a spinel structure accompanied by LaFeO₃ and La₂O₃ secondary phases. The electrochemical behavior of the electrode was investigated using techniques such as chronoamperometry and cyclic voltammetry. The activation process was relatively slow, with the maximum discharge capacity of 106 mAh/g achieved only after 46 cycles. This sluggish activation is likely due to structural rearrangements.

The gradual decrease in discharge capacity after the activation process was attributed to mechanical degradation of the electrode, particularly cracking and fracturing caused by volumetric expansion and contraction during charge/discharge cycles. These defects likely contributed to the loss or detachment of active material, thereby reducing the number of electrochemically accessible sites.

A strong correlation was observed between discharge capacity, polarization, and current density throughout cycling. The high La³⁺ concentration was found to destabilize the spinel structure, facilitating the emergence of the LaFeO₃ perovskite phase. This structural transformation negatively affected both the integrity and the electrochemical performance of the electrode.

Compared to analogous compounds, the ZnLaFeO₄ alloy developed in this study demonstrates a significantly enhanced electrochemical performance. Undoped ZnFe₂O₄, for instance, commonly suffers from a low discharge capacity and poor cycling stability due to its limited electrical conductivity and inherent structural limitations. Similarly, while LaFeO₃ is known for its chemical stability, its perovskite structure is not well-suited to hydrogen storage, leading to a suboptimal performance in Ni-MH batteries. In contrast, the ZnLaFeO₄ compound exhibits a maximum discharge capacity of 106 mAh/g along with stable cycling behavior. These improvements underscore the beneficial role of La doping, which appears to enhance charge transport and corrosion resistance within the spinel structure. Overall, ZnLaFeO₄ emerges as a promising candidate for use as an anode material in Ni-MH battery systems.

Future work will focus on a more controlled and gradual substitution of La³⁺ into the spinel lattice, to investigate its effects on the structural stability and overall electrochemical performance of the material.