Next Article in Journal
A New Framework of Vehicle-to-Grid Economic Evaluation: From Semi-Systematic Review of 132 Prior Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Division of Lacustrine Environment and Significance for Shale Oil Exploration: A Case Study of the Third Member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag
Previous Article in Special Issue
Testing Method for Non-Isothermal Radial Wall Jets from Ceiling Diffusers Used in Building Ventilation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Thermal Comfort, Environmental Quality, and Energy Consumption in the Built Environment

by
Jan Kaczmarczyk
1,
Aleksandra Lipczyńska
1 and
Asit Kumar Mishra
2,3,*
1
Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
School of Public Health, University College Cork, T12 XF62 Cork, Ireland
3
DTU Sustain, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(12), 3087; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123087
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Accepted: 10 June 2025 / Published: 11 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermal Comfort, Environment Quality and Energy Consumption)
The built environment is a cornerstone of human well-being, influencing health, productivity, well-being, and a sustainable life [1,2,3,4]. As societies strive to mitigate climate change and enhance healthy living, the interplay between thermal comfort, environmental quality, and energy consumption has become a focal point for researchers and practitioners alike. This Special Issue of Energies brings together cutting-edge research that addresses these interconnected challenges, offers innovative solutions to optimize building performance, and highlights the need for prioritizing occupant needs.

1. The Interplay of Key Factors

The delicate balance between thermal comfort, environmental quality, and energy efficiency is a central theme in modern building design. However, achieving these goals often seems to conflict with the imperative to reduce energy consumption, particularly in the race towards a net-zero society and with tightening global sustainability targets.
Buildings account for approximately 40% of global energy consumption and contribute over 30% of CO2 emissions, with a significant proportion used for thermal comfort provision [5]. The high energy consumption of air conditioning systems is largely due to the uniform control of indoor temperature regardless of building location, despite evidence suggesting this rigidity is unnecessary for ensuring occupant comfort [6,7]. Substantial energy savings could be achieved by allowing for wider ranges of indoor temperature fluctuation while maintaining satisfactory comfort levels [4,6,8,9,10].
The papers in this Special Issue exemplify the multidisciplinary approaches required to navigate these challenges. The presented research highlights how technological innovation and holistic design can reconcile these competing priorities, from advanced ventilation systems to biophilic design and renewable energy integration.

2. Key Contributions from the Special Issue

2.1. Optimizing Ventilation for Energy Efficiency, Comfort, and Sustainable Cooling Solutions

The study “Testing Method for Non-Isothermal Radial Wall Jets from Ceiling Diffusers Used in Building Ventilation” [11] addresses a critical issue in variable air volume (VAV) systems: the risk of cold air dumping during low-flow conditions. The authors provide a framework for minimizing discomfort while maintaining energy efficiency by introducing a method to assess non-isothermal jet behavior.
Similarly, “Ventilation Methods for Improving Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency in Multi-Family Buildings in Central Europe” [12] underscores the limitations of natural ventilation in retrofitted buildings. Simulation results emphasize the superior performance of mechanical ventilation systems, substantially improving indoor air quality (IAQ) while reducing heating energy requirements, an essential finding for Central Europe’s extensive stock of thermally retrofitted residential buildings.
Expanding the scope to outdoor thermal environments, the work “Cooling of Air in Outdoor Areas of Human Habitation” [13] explores evaporative cooling coupled with photovoltaic (PV) systems as a sustainable alternative to conventional compressor-based cooling systems for urban outdoor spaces. With solar energy meeting 81% of the cooling demand, this solution emerges as the most efficient and environmentally friendly solution. This approach not only mitigates urban heat island effects but also optimizes energy use through renewable resources.
Recent advances in outdoor evaporative cooling technologies have further demonstrated their effectiveness in hot climates, with systems capable of lowering the dry air temperature to 95% of the wet-bulb temperature [14]. Moreover, the development of modular and context-aware evaporative cooling systems for outdoor urban environments represents a promising approach to mitigating heat stress in public spaces while minimizing water consumption through intelligent control systems [15].
These studies emphasize the importance of implementing smart ventilation strategies that adapt to occupancy and climate conditions, as well as innovations aimed at addressing challenges posed by climate change. Considering the changing climate, the demand for comfort cooling is increasing, making the sustainable provision of such cooling one of the crucial challenges for the future built environment.

2.2. Innovative HVAC Control and Air Distribution Strategies

“Influence of Control Strategy on Heat Recovery Efficiency in a Single-Duct Periodic Ventilation Device” [16] demonstrates how simple sensor-based adjustments can improve heat recovery efficiency by over 10%. Balancing air supply and exhaust cycles significantly enhanced system efficiency and reliability under real-world conditions. This cost-effective decentralized solution shows promise for widespread implementation in existing residential buildings, aligning energy savings with indoor environmental quality.
The use of sensor-based adjustments presents a complementary step to model predictive control (MPC). MPC has emerged as a promising approach for optimizing HVAC system operation. MPC strategies can significantly reduce energy consumption while maintaining or improving occupant comfort through predictive algorithms that anticipate building needs based on weather forecasts, occupancy patterns, and thermal dynamics [17]. MPC implementation could yield energy savings of ~20%, though practical challenges remain in developing accurate predictive models and integrating these systems with existing building management systems [18].
“Innovative High-Induction Air Diffuser for Enhanced Air Mixing in Vehicles and Personalized Ventilation Applications” [19] introduces a diffuser that improves air entrainment by 48% compared to traditional diffusers, reducing temperature disparities in vehicle cabins. This technology enhances the thermal comfort of vehicle occupants and has broader applications for personalized ventilation [20] in offices and other enclosed spaces.

2.3. Biophilic Design and Occupant Well-Being

The integration of biophilic design elements has shown significant potential for improving occupant well-being [21]. The research “Effect of Indoor Green Walls on Environment Perception and Well-Being of Occupants in Office Buildings” [22] highlights the dual benefits of biophilic design: improving air humidity and occupants’ perception of the indoor environment while also enhancing psychological well-being. Green walls matched the performance of standalone humidifiers while fostering a more positive work environment. The findings reinforce the importance of nature-based solutions in sustainable building design and compliment similar findings carried out worldwide [23,24].

3. Towards Integrated Solutions

The diversity of research in this Special Issue is a testament to the cross-disciplinary impact of this issue. It also reflects the complexity of creating energy-efficient, comfortable, and healthy buildings. Several overarching themes emerge:
  • Adaptability: Systems must respond dynamically to occupancy, climate, and user preferences and adaptability [5,25] (e.g., sensor-controlled ventilation, VAV adjustments).
  • Renewables Integration: Solar energy and passive cooling strategies can decouple comfort from high energy consumption. Simultaneously, it is becoming imperative to incorporate circular economy principles like building repurposing and material reuse [26].
  • Human-Centric Design: Occupant well-being should drive innovation, whether through biophilic elements or novel, personalized systems [27,28]. Context-specific and dynamic systems can be the future of indoor thermal comfort [29].
  • Holistic Retrofitting: As shown in the multi-family building study, deep energy retrofits must prioritize the indoor environmental quality alongside the energy efficiency of the space [30]. This is also an important change introduced into the 2024 recast of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, EU [31].

4. Conclusions

This Special Issue underscores the transformative potential of interdisciplinary research in shaping the future of the built environment. By bridging the gap between energy efficiency and occupant-centric design, the featured papers provide actionable insights for architects, engineers, and policymakers. As the world transitions toward net-zero buildings, the lessons from these studies will be invaluable in creating spaces that are not only sustainable but also conducive to human health and productivity.
As part of the second edition of this Special Issue, we invite researchers to build upon these findings and continue exploring innovative approaches to harmonizing thermal comfort, environmental quality, and energy consumption in the built environment. For instance, the scalability of evaporative cooling in humid climates or the long-term maintenance of green walls warrants further exploration. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence for real-time system optimization presents an exciting frontier.

Funding

A.K.M. is a Dorothy and Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellow, partly funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101034345.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used in this work.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the authors who chose to publish their work in this Special Issue. Their cooperation during the review and publication process is highly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lamb, S.; Kwok, K.C.S. A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers. Appl. Ergon. 2016, 52, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seppanen, O.; Fisk, W.J.; Faulkner, D. Control of temperature for health and productivity in offices. ASHRAE Trans. 2005, 111, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisk, W.J. Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2000, 25, 537–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kent, M.G.; Huynh, N.K.; Mishra, A.K.; Tartarini, F.; Lipczynska, A.; Li, J.; Sultan, Z.; Goh, E.; Karunagaran, G.; Natarajan, A.; et al. Energy savings and thermal comfort in a zero energy office building with fans in Singapore. Build. Environ. 2023, 243, 110674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, L.; Yan, H.; Lam, J.C. Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications—A review. Appl. Energy 2014, 115, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rupp, R.F.; Vásquez, N.G.; Lamberts, R. A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment. Energy Build. 2015, 105, 178–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mishra, A.K.; Ramgopal, M. Field studies on human thermal comfort—An overview. Build. Environ. 2013, 64, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bienvenido-Huertas, D.; Pulido-Arcas, J.A.; Rubio-Bellido, C.; Perez-Fargallo, A. Feasibility of adaptive thermal comfort for energy savings in cooling and heating: A study on Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Urban Clim. 2021, 36, 100807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lipczynska, A.; Schiavon, S.; Graham, L.T. Thermal comfort and self-reported productivity in an office with ceiling fans in the tropics. Build. Environ. 2018, 135, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoyt, T.; Arens, E.; Zhang, H. Extending air temperature setpoints: Simulated energy savings and design considerations for new and retrofit buildings. Build. Environ. 2015, 88, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hurnik, M. Testing Method for Non-Isothermal Radial Wall Jets from Ceiling Diffusers Used in Building Ventilation. Energies 2025, 18, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferdyn-Grygierek, J.; Grygierek, K. Ventilation Methods for Improving the Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency of Multi-Family Buildings in Central Europe. Energies 2024, 17, 2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barnat, E.; Sekret, R.; Babiarz, B. Cooling of Air in Outdoor Areas of Human Habitation. Energies 2024, 17, 6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dhariwal, J.; Manandhar, P.; Bande, L.; Marpu, P.; Armstrong, P.; Reinhart, C.F. Evaluating the effectiveness of outdoor evaporative cooling in a hot, arid climate. Build. Environ. 2019, 150, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stojanovic, D.; Vujovic, M.; Ding, Y.; Katic, M. Context-aware module for evaporative cooling in the outdoor built environment. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 2023, 21, 100–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koper, P. Influence of Control Strategy on Heat Recovery Efficiency in a Single-Duct Periodic Ventilation Device. Energies 2024, 17, 5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taheri, S.; Hosseini, P.; Razban, A. Model predictive control of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems: A state-of-the-art review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 60, 105067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rockett, P.; Hathway, E.A. Model-predictive control for non-domestic buildings: A critical review and prospects. Build. Res. Inf. 2017, 45, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bode, F.I.; Joldos, T.O.; Sirbu, G.M.; Danca, P.; Cosoiu, C.; Nastase, I. Innovative High-Induction Air Diffuser for Enhanced Air Mixing in Vehicles and Personalized Ventilation Applications. Energies 2024, 17, 2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Melikov, A. Personalized ventilation. Indoor Air 2004, 14, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Richardson, M.; Butler, C.W. Nature connectedness and biophilic design. Build. Res. Inf. 2022, 50, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lipczynska, A.; Kaczmarczyk, J.; Dziedzic, B. Effect of Indoor Green Walls on Environment Perception and Well-Being of Occupants in Office Buildings. Energies 2024, 17, 5690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Budaniya, M.; Mishra, A.K.; Rai, A.C.; Dasgupta, M.S. Indoor plants’ effect on occupants’ performance, perceived comfort, and affect in an open-plan space in composite climatic regions, India. Build. Environ. 2025, 274, 112785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, X.; Du, M.; Deng, P.; Zhou, T.; Hong, B. Effects of green walls on thermal perception and cognitive performance: An indoor study. Build. Environ. 2024, 250, 111180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, R.; Zhang, S.; Du, C.; Schweiker, M.; Hodder, S.; Olesen, B.W.; Toftum, J.; d’Ambrosio, F.R.; Gebhardt, H.; Zhou, S. Evolution and performance analysis of adaptive thermal comfort models–A comprehensive literature review. Build. Environ. 2022, 217, 109020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palomar-Torres, A.; Rey-Hernández, J.M.; Rey-Hernández, A.; Rey-Martínez, F.J. Decarbonizing Near-Zero-Energy Buildings to Zero-Emission Buildings: A Holistic Life Cycle Approach to Minimize Embodied and Operational Emissions Through Circular Economy Strategies. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rugani, R.; Bernagozzi, M.; Picco, M.; Salvadori, G.; Marengo, M.; Zhang, H.; Fantozzi, F. Thermal comfort and energy efficiency evaluation of a novel conductive-radiative Personal Comfort System. Build. Environ. 2023, 244, 110787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rawal, R.; Schweiker, M.; Kazanci, O.B.; Vardhan, V.; Jin, Q.; Duanmu, L. Personal comfort systems: A review on comfort, energy, and economics. Energy Build. 2020, 214, 109858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, A.K.; Loomans, M.; Hensen, J.L.M. Thermal comfort of heterogeneous and dynamic indoor conditions—An overview. Build. Environ. 2016, 109, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jayalath, A.; Vaz-Serra, P.; Hui, F.K.P.; Aye, L. Thermally comfortable energy efficient affordable houses: A review. Build. Environ. 2024, 256, 111495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kurnitski, J. Model Indoor Environmental Quality regulation to fulfil new provisions of 2024 EPBD recast. REHVA J. 2025, 2025, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaczmarczyk, J.; Lipczyńska, A.; Mishra, A.K. Thermal Comfort, Environmental Quality, and Energy Consumption in the Built Environment. Energies 2025, 18, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123087

AMA Style

Kaczmarczyk J, Lipczyńska A, Mishra AK. Thermal Comfort, Environmental Quality, and Energy Consumption in the Built Environment. Energies. 2025; 18(12):3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaczmarczyk, Jan, Aleksandra Lipczyńska, and Asit Kumar Mishra. 2025. "Thermal Comfort, Environmental Quality, and Energy Consumption in the Built Environment" Energies 18, no. 12: 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123087

APA Style

Kaczmarczyk, J., Lipczyńska, A., & Mishra, A. K. (2025). Thermal Comfort, Environmental Quality, and Energy Consumption in the Built Environment. Energies, 18(12), 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop