Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Power Quality in Standalone Microgrids Powered by Wind and Battery Systems Using HO Algorithm Based Super Twisting Sliding Mode Controllers
Previous Article in Journal
The Optimal Integration of Virtual Power Plants for the South African National Grid Based on an Energy Mix as per the Integrated Resource Plan 2019: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Method for Assessing the Causes of Damage to a Bearing in a Rotary Air Preheater

by
Paweł Maślak
*,† and
Grzegorz Przybyłek
Department of Machine and Vehicle Design and Research, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Energies 2024, 17(24), 6490; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246490
Submission received: 15 November 2024 / Revised: 9 December 2024 / Accepted: 19 December 2024 / Published: 23 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section J: Thermal Management)

Abstract

:
This article presents a method for identifying the cause of damage to a rotary air preheater on one of the fluidized bed boilers operating in a power plant. The bearing in question operates under harsh conditions with the exhaust gas temperature reaching 287 °C and causing its casing to heat up intensively. It is therefore important to ensure that the bearing is constantly cooled by water, which lowers the operating temperature and thus extends its service life. Unfortunately, after a short period of operation, the upper double-row spherical roller bearing was damaged, and the tests presented in the assessment method helped to determine the cause of damage to its casing.

1. Introduction

The rotary air preheater (LUVO, Figure 1) is one of the auxiliary devices of a steam generator and consists of a rotor and its drive, flanged connections, bearings, seals, and housing. Its task is to recover the temperature from the exhaust gases leaving the boiler and to heat up the air flowing in the opposite direction. The heated air is used to heat up the dust that enters the boiler through coal burners to ignition temperature. The heat is transferred through a vertical-axis rotor.
The rotor of the rotary air preheater consists of a sheet metal structure, which is the main part of the heat exchanger, and two end pins supported on self-aligning spherical roller bearings (transverse on top, tapered at the bottom). These pins are fixed to the sheet metal element with a screw connection.
The application of a self-aligning spherical roller bearing in the top section of the preheater has a number of advantages. The most important one is the insensitivity to misalignment of the shaft in relation to the housing resulting from shaft deflection. In addition, spherical roller bearings can support high radial loads as well as high axial loads in both directions [1,2]. The entire rotor is enclosed in a sealed casing with flanged connections on top and bottom for exhaust gases and air.
The preheater casing divides the device into two zones: the flue gas zone and the air zone. Usually, the casing is divided into two sectors, but there are other possibilities depending on the required parameters, i.e., the required air heating temperature. The height and diameter of the rotor can also vary. The size of the device is chosen based on the size of the steam generator, and the efficiency of the preheater has a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the boiler.
The bearing component of the aforementioned rotor in the rotary air preheater consists of an axial thrust bearing underneath the rotor and a guide bearing on top of the rotor. The rotor guide bearing is a double-row spherical roller bearing with an outer diameter of 520 mm with an F7 fit and an inner diameter of 340 mm with a g6 fit. The static radial capacity for that bearing is 6,199,830 N, and the axial capacity is the same value [3].
The damage to the self-aligning spherical roller bearing of the rotary air preheater is shown in Figure 2.
Bearings are critical components in various mechanical systems, facilitating smooth motion and reducing friction between moving parts. However, the integrity of bearings can be compromised due to various factors, leading to cracks and subsequent failure. In one power plant, after several months of operation, there was an emergency shutdown of the preheater on a fluidized bed boiler due to damage to the top bearing. The aim of the research on this bearing was to conduct an analysis to identify a case of sudden destruction. The bearing worked for 6 months and was destroyed. The designed operating time of this bearing is 10 years. Due to such a period of planned operation, the analysis was carried out with the scope of immediate damages and not fatigue. The fatigue life of this bearing was not monitored.

2. State of Art

This summary examines research on bearing damage in industrial equipment, including wind turbines and rotary air preheaters. Bearing damage in rotary air preheaters is a critical issue that can lead to significant operational disruptions and maintenance costs. Understanding the causes and early detection methods for bearing damage is essential for maintaining the efficiency and reliability of these systems.
Monitoring vibration amplitude and temperature is crucial for detecting bearing issues, with values exceeding 4.5 mm/s and 70 °C indicating potential problems [4]. Bearing damage can lead to significant operational disruptions, as seen in a power plant where gear failure caused a unit shutdown. Improper lubrication and installation procedures are common causes of bearing damage in compressors [5]. In wind turbines, main bearing replacements occur earlier than expected, with 10% replaced by 10.5 years and up to 25% by 20 years [6]. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current theory and practice related to the main bearings used in wind turbines, including their design, operation, modeling, damage mechanisms, and fault detection. Spalling is the primary type of damage observed, often resulting from surface-initiated rolling contact fatigue. These findings highlight the importance of proper maintenance and monitoring to prevent bearing failures and extend equipment lifespan. This survey [7] collects the efforts to understand the sources and consequences of damage to babbitted industrial bearings, which operate by means of a hydrodynamic, or hydrostatic, film. Major individual damage types are discussed in the context of major damage categories.
The paper [8] examines the causes and mechanisms of bearing damage in aircraft gas turbine main shaft bearings, finding that the initial damage is often caused by surface defects and that the failure mechanism involves peeling and spalling of the bearing surface. An examination of approximately 200 bearing incidents in current aircraft engines has shown that damage in the bearing is initiated at the surface. The initial damage was produced by abrasive particles, dents, grinding scores, skidding, large carbides, and corrosion pits. The first phase of the failure mechanism appeared to be by peeling, where microscopic regions about 0.13 mm (0.005 in) were removed from the surface, and the peels eventually developed into spalls. These mechanisms of failure are a consequence of the partial EHD lubrication utilized in these bearings and the consequent sharing of the load by the asperities and the EHD film.
The paper [9] reviews traditional algorithms used to detect and diagnose faulty ball bearings in rotating machinery. This paper shows traditional signal processing algorithms used to detect and diagnose faults in ball bearings of heavy-duty milling machine tool spindle heads. Different kinds of faults have been created deliberately on the bearings of a test spindle head.
The paper [10] provides a comprehensive survey of theoretical and simulation approaches to understanding adhesive joint failures. This review, conducted within the framework of the CERTBOND initiative, focuses on methods applicable across aerospace, automotive, civil engineering, and other sectors. The authors examine nine models, including classical analytical methods, process zone methods, linear elastic fracture mechanics, the virtual crack closure technique, and the cohesive zone method, among others. Each model is discussed in terms of methodology, required parameters, advantages, disadvantages, and specific industrial applications. The review highlights both strengths and limitations of these models in handling complex factors like crack propagation, environmental effects, and composite materials, providing a critical comparative analysis that guides future improvements in adhesive joint certification and application.
The paper [11] explores a method to assess bearing loads in hydraulic excavator drive systems. The authors develop a mathematical model to calculate the forces and moments experienced by the slewing bearings during operation. This model uses measurements of the excavator’s kinematic chain and hydraulic pressures to compute load vectors under real-world conditions. By analyzing these loads, particularly during the digging phase, the study provides insights to optimize bearing selection for durability and performance. This research contributes valuable data for improving excavator design, ensuring structural integrity and operational efficiency.
The paper [12] investigates the thermal behavior of threaded spindle bearings in CNC machines. By focusing on ZKLN type bearings, the study uses finite-element analysis (FEA) to model heat generation and dissipation due to friction. The iterative process combines analytical methods and FEA simulations to optimize the thermal load calculations. The results reveal that while housing materials slightly affect heat distribution, managing thermal loads is essential for accurate machine performance, as heat can induce deformations that compromise precision. This work contributes a systematic approach for enhancing spindle bearing design in high-speed applications.
This summary examines failure analyses in various industrial applications. Cracking in air preheater components was attributed to microstructure degradation and high thermomechanical stress [13]. API X70 steel, used in ethanol pipelines, showed susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) and corrosion fatigue, particularly in notched specimens and under staggered constant load conditions [14]. A comprehensive review of failure case studies highlighted issues such as buckling in pressurized vessels, fatigue failures in welded structures, and environmentally assisted cracking in various materials and components [15]. In a liquid sulfur recovery unit, a 304 stainless-steel heat exchanger failed due to pitting corrosion, intergranular corrosion, and SCC caused by sulfuric acid and chloride ions [16]. These studies emphasize the importance of understanding material behavior, environmental factors, and stress conditions in preventing industrial failures.
For wind turbines, premature main bearing failures primarily result from rolling contact fatigue, often requiring replacements much earlier than expected. Aircraft turbine bearings frequently fail due to surface defects and spalling initiated by abrasives and corrosion. A review paper on ball bearing fault detection discusses traditional signal processing methods, while another paper investigates adhesive joint failures and presents various modeling techniques to predict crack propagation under industrial conditions.
Cracked bearings represent a significant challenge in mechanical systems, with implications for performance, maintenance, and safety. By understanding the causes of bearing cracks and implementing effective mitigation strategies, engineers and maintenance personnel can enhance the reliability and longevity of bearing systems. Overall, these studies emphasize that proactive maintenance and optimized design, supported by analytical and simulation models, are crucial for extending equipment lifespan and reliability across industries.

3. Chemical Composition Analysis

At the beginning of research, the chemical composition was analyzed with a spectrometer to determine the type of material used for the bearing [17,18]. All elements of the bearing were tested, i.e., the inner ring, damaged outer ring, spherical roller elements, and cage (Figure 3).
Table 1 shows the identified alloying elements and their percentage in the material of the damaged outer ring of the bearing.
Based on the percentage composition of elements, it was determined that the material that best matches this composition is AISI 6150 alloy steel (1.8159/51CrV4) [18]. Mechanical properties of that steel are shown in Table 2. The most important are the tensile and yield strength of that steel.
During X-ray analysis, the spectrometer detected exceedances for some alloying elements contained in this steel (marked red—Table 1). When analyzing the different percentages of individual elements, it should be noted that each bearing manufacturer uses its own proprietary technology to manufacture bearing parts. This is why small exceedances in the percentage of alloying elements for the identified steel grade are acceptable.
The material used for the outer ring of the bearing is highly wear-resistant. It has a very good impact strength and is highly resistant to dynamic loads (higher-class heat treatment). Therefore, this material is commonly used in loaded machine parts such as shafts, gears, gearboxes, and rolling elements operating at high temperatures [18]. Moreover, during production, individual elements of bearings, i.e., the outer and inner rings and rolling elements, are subjected to 100% UT inspection (ultrasonic testing).

4. Measurement of Raceway Hardness

The second parameter that is important in determining the steel grade is hardness. When carrying out hardness measurements, the Vickers method was used (Figure 4). The tests were performed on two parts of the damaged ring in 10 points that were uniformly distributed along the circumference of the bearing. The number of measurements at each point ranged from 6 to 10, and the obtained hardness range was from 61.8 HRC to 62.1 HRC.
According to the literature, corrosion-resistant bearing steels are obtained through the process of hardening (820–840 °C) and low tempering at 180 °C (1 ÷ 2 h), which produces a hardness of 62.5 HRC [18]. Therefore, the measured values confirm that the outer ring of the bearing in the rotary air preheater has undergone proper heat treatment.

5. Non-Destructive Testing

When assessing the technical condition of structures or when identifying causes of damage to components of devices or machines, non-destructive testing methods are often used [19,20].

5.1. Visual Testing

The basic method of non-invasive assessment is visual testing, which was carried out on all elements of the damaged bearing [21,22]. The visual inspection of the outer ring revealed a discontinuity in the material of the outer raceway, which passes through the oil hole and groove. The visual inspection of the fracture resulting from the separation of a fragment of the casing revealed three types of fracture surfaces:
  • Fatigue fracture (marked red—Figure 5);
  • Shear damage (marked yellow—Figure 5);
  • Contact pressure areas—indentations in the separated part of the ring (marked blue—Figure 6).
In addition, formations of non-ferrous metals were found on the fracture surface, which means that during the failure, a part of the ring must have come into contact with the cage that is made of brass (Figure 7).
Other phenomena caused by the temporary overloading of the bearing included the flaking of material, denting in the separated fragments of rolling elements, seizures, and crevice corrosion, particularly visible on the inner raceway of the bearing (Figure 8). Additionally, tests revealed damage to the side surfaces of the outer ring (Figure 9).
When the rolling elements of the damaged bearing were examined, most of them had cavities, chipping, and spalling (Figure 10a).
The damage to the inner ring of the air preheater bearing caused by excessive contact pressures, through excessive bearing deflection, resulted in the grinding of the surface of a significant number of rollers; there are “fresh” signs of material flaking (Figure 10b).
The aforementioned damage may have already started while the bearing was in operation and not as a direct result of a failure because the LUVO bearing is subject to heavy and low cycle loads.
In addition, when operating in severe conditions (elevated temperatures), the bearing sustains so-called secondary damage. Figure 11 shows an example of such damage in the form of fretting corrosion on the outer ring.
Fretting corrosion is commonly encountered when operating conditions cause deformations of bearing seats under heavy loads. It can be black (as recorded in this case), red, or reddish brown. Over time, advanced corrosion leads to improper contact between the mating surfaces of elements and consequently to bearing damage.

5.2. Magnetic Particle Testing

In order to determine the extent of damage to the outer and inner raceways of the bearing, non-destructive tests were carried out using the magnetic particle method (MT). During the inspection, the wet magnetic particle testing method with a permanent magnet was used. To detect the flux leakage field, magnetic particles in an aerosol suspension were sprayed onto the tested component during magnetization. The test area of the part was cleaned of oil and painted with contrast paint to improve the sensitivity of particle defectographs [23,24,25,26].
Based on the test results, it was possible to determine the geometric form and the size of the crack on the outer ring of the bearing (Figure 12).

6. Finite-Element Analysis

Based on the documentation provided for the upper rotary shaft of the air heater, a numerical model was built.
A load was applied to the model in the form of forces causing a bending moment of the shaft and pressure applied to the lubrication holes; the model was supported on bearings in accordance with the documentation, shown in Figure 13.
The values of the loads adopted for numerical calculations are as follows:
force causing a bending moment:F1 = 14.5 kN
lubricant pressure:p = 0.1 MPa
rotation speed:v = 1.1 min −1
The numerical model with loads is shown in Figure 14.
Strength calculations were performed, and the results of calculations indicating the places of maximum stress of the bearing raceway are shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16. The highest stress values were obtained in the area of the lubrication introduction holes. The values reach 498 MPa, which is above the value of yield strength of AISI 6150 alloy steel (1.8159/51CrV4). In those conditions, the crack appeared next to the lubricant hole.
The stress around the grease hole was above the yield limit for steel AISI 6150 alloy steel (1.8159/51CrV4), which caused the material to plasticize and became the site of crack initiation. This became one of the main reasons for the failure of the bearing.

7. Conclusions

The material of the bearing was tested for chemical composition and hardness. By measuring the percentage of individual alloying elements in the steel, it was determined that the material used to build the bearing satisfies the standards and complies with the documentation of the device manufacturer. The hardness of the material was measured in order to verify that the correct heat treatment process was selected for the bearing components. The obtained hardness values (~62 HRC) confirmed that correct heat treatment was used for the bearing.
Based on the abovementioned results of the material tests, it was determined that the failure was not caused by poor quality of the supporting bearing. The design error caused the appearance of a crack in the bearing raceway, which later caused the destruction and damage of the entire bearing.
Non-destructive testing was the step in determining the cause of bearing damage. The test results identified damage in the form of a crack in the bearing’s outer ring, material flaking, and seizures of the inner raceway and fractures of its side surface. In addition, the visual inspection revealed the presence of fretting, which propagated during operation and became one of the main causes of damage to the rotary air preheater bearing. Fretting usually occurs when the fit is insufficient/too loose and there is relative motion between the bearing ring and housing. Relative motion is usually caused by shape inaccuracies or shaft deflection and causes small pieces of the material to split off from the surface of the seat in the housing. These pieces oxidize quickly upon contact with air. The corrosion on the outer ring (Figure 11) produces local shape imperfections on the surface of the bearing seat; the volume of iron oxide is larger than that of pure steel. The natively concave and convex bearing seat resulted in insufficient fit between the bearing ring and the seat surface along its width, which is why it deflected under load, resulting in a fatigue crack on the circumference of the ring raceway; the ring cracked at its weakest point, in the oil groove. The likely direction of propagation and the resulting loss of material integrity of the outer ring is shown in Figure 17.
The fretting, which resulted in the failure of the air preheater, could have also been caused by human error when the bearing seat was mounted.
To sum up, as a result of the performed tests, it was determined that the direct cause of failure of the rotary air preheater support was fretting, which occurred due to a design error—the fit was insufficient—and/or there where manufacturing flaws—incorrect mounting of the bearing in the housing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M. and G.P.; methodology, P.M. and G.P.; investigation, P.M. and G.P.; resources, P.M. and G.P.; data curation, P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, P.M. and G.P.; visualization, P.M. and G.P.; supervision, P.M. and G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Smolnicki, T. Fizykalne Aspekty Koherencji Wielkogabarytowych Łożysk Tocznych i Odkształcalnych Konstrukcji Wsporczych; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wrocław, Poland, 2002. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  2. Smolnicki, T. Large-Diameter Rolling Bearings. Global and Local Problems; Wrocław University of Technology Publishing House: Wrocław, Poland, 2013. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  3. Available online: http://www.skf.com (accessed on 25 October 2024).
  4. Hartono, B.; Sutisna, S.P. Analisa kerusakan bearing suspention preheater fan berbasis data temperatur dan vibrasi. AME (Apl. Mek. Dan Energi) J. Ilm. Tek. Mesin 2018, 4, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hart, E.; Raby, K.; Keller, J.; Sheng, S.; Long, H.; Carroll, J.; Brasseur, J.; Tough, F. Main Bearing Replacement and Damage—A Field Data Study on 15 Gigawatts of Wind Energy Capacity; NREL: Golden, CO, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hart, E.; Clarke, B.; Nicholas, G.; Kazemi Amiri, A.K.; Stirling, J.; Carroll, J.R.; Dwyer-Joyce, R.; McDonald, A.; Long, H. A review of wind turbine main bearings: Design, operation, modelling, damage mechanisms and fault detection. Wind. Energy Sci. 2020, 5, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Branagan, L. Survey of Damage Investigation of Babbitted Industrial Bearings, Engineering, Materials Science. Lubricants 2015, 3, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Averbach, B.; Bamberger, E. Analysis of bearing incidents in aircraft gas turbine mainshaft bearings. Tribol. Trans. 1991, 34, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bediaga, I.; Mendizabal, X.; Arnaiz, A.; Munoa, J. Ball bearing damage detection using traditional signal processing algorithms. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 2013, 16, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tserpes, K.; Barroso-Caro, A.; Carraro, P.A.; Beber, V.C.; Floros, I.; Gamon, W.; Kozłowski, M.; Santandrea, F.; Shahverdi, M.; Skejić, D.; et al. A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints. J. Adhes. 2022, 98, 1855–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jovanović, V.; Janošević, D.; Petrović, N. Experimental determination of bearing loads in rotating platform drive mechanisms of hydraulic excavators. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 2014, 12, 157–169. [Google Scholar]
  12. Krstić, V.; Milčić, D.; Milčić, M. A thermal analysis of the threaded spindle bearing assembly in numerically controlled machine tools. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 2018, 16, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fuwei, L.; Xiaodong, H.; Chongbin, M.; Bin, Y.; Yun, L. Failure analysis on cracking of backing plate of lifting lug for air preheater. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 109, 104395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. dos Santos, E.A.; Giorgetti, V.; Júnior, C.A.d.S.; Marcomini, J.B.; Sordi, V.L.; Rovere, C.A.D. Stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue analysis of API X70 steel exposed to a circulating ethanol environment. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2022, 200, 104846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, D.R. Failure Analysis Case Studies II: A Sourcebook of Case Studies Selected from the Pages of Engineering Failure Analysis 1997–1999; Engineering, Environmental Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, X.; Liu, M.; Liu, Z.; Du, C.; Li, X. Failure analysis of a 304 stainless steel heat exchanger in liquid sulfur recovery units. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 116, 104729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. PN-EN ISO 683-17:2015-01;  Stale do Obróbki Cieplnej, Stale Stopowe i Stale Automatowe. Część 17: Stale na Łożyska Kulkowe i Wałeczkowe. ISO: Geneva, Swetzerland, 2015. (In Polish)
  18. Luty, W. Metaloznawstwo i Obróbka Cieplna Stali Łożyskowych; WNT: Warsaw, Poland, 1980. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  19. PN-EN 1330-2; Badania Nieniszczące. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2001. (In Polish)
  20. PN-EN 13018; Badania Nieniszczące—Badania Wizualne. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2004. (In Polish)
  21. PN-EN 12454; Odlewnictwo—Badania Wizualne Nieciągłości Powierzchniowych. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. (In Polish)
  22. PN-EN ISO 9934-1;  Badania Nieniszczące—Badania Magnetyczno—Proszkowe. Część 1: Zasady Ogólne. ISO: Geneva, Swetzerland, 2017. (In Polish)
  23. PN-EN 1369; Odlewnictwo—Badania Magnetyczno—Proszkowe. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. (In Polish)
  24. PN-EN 10228-1; Badania Nieniszczące Odkuwek Stalowych—Badania Magnetyczno—Proszkowe. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2016. (In Polish)
  25. PN-EN 10246-12; Badania Nieniszczące rur Stalowych. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. (In Polish)
  26. PN-EN 10288-4; Badania Nieniszczące Odkuwek Stalowych—Badania Ultradźwiękowe Odkuwek ze Stali Nierdzewnych, Austenitycznych i Austenityczno-Ferrytycznych. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2003. (In Polish)
Figure 1. The installation of a rotary air preheater on the steam generator.
Figure 1. The installation of a rotary air preheater on the steam generator.
Energies 17 06490 g001
Figure 2. Damaged self-aligning spherical roller guide bearing of the rotary air preheater.
Figure 2. Damaged self-aligning spherical roller guide bearing of the rotary air preheater.
Energies 17 06490 g002
Figure 3. Damaged self-aligning.
Figure 3. Damaged self-aligning.
Energies 17 06490 g003
Figure 4. The measurement of hardness of the damaged outer ring of the bearing using the COMPUTEST S.C. hardness meter CISAM-ERNST, 2018, Switzerland.
Figure 4. The measurement of hardness of the damaged outer ring of the bearing using the COMPUTEST S.C. hardness meter CISAM-ERNST, 2018, Switzerland.
Energies 17 06490 g004
Figure 5. Fracture of the outer ring of the bearing. Fatigue, conchoidal zone (red arrows) and shear, residual zone (yellow arrows).
Figure 5. Fracture of the outer ring of the bearing. Fatigue, conchoidal zone (red arrows) and shear, residual zone (yellow arrows).
Energies 17 06490 g005
Figure 6. Zone of contact pressure between the separated part of the raceway and the rest of the raceway.
Figure 6. Zone of contact pressure between the separated part of the raceway and the rest of the raceway.
Energies 17 06490 g006
Figure 7. Traces of brass, which the bearing cage is made of.
Figure 7. Traces of brass, which the bearing cage is made of.
Energies 17 06490 g007
Figure 8. Signs of peeling and damage to the raceway and side surfaces of the inner ring.
Figure 8. Signs of peeling and damage to the raceway and side surfaces of the inner ring.
Energies 17 06490 g008
Figure 9. Signs of damage to the side surfaces of the outer ring.
Figure 9. Signs of damage to the side surfaces of the outer ring.
Energies 17 06490 g009
Figure 10. Damage to the bearing’s rolling elements: (a) chipped contact surface between the rolling element and the raceway; (b) chipped edge of the rolling element.
Figure 10. Damage to the bearing’s rolling elements: (a) chipped contact surface between the rolling element and the raceway; (b) chipped edge of the rolling element.
Energies 17 06490 g010
Figure 11. Fretting corrosion on the bearing’s outer ring mating surface – marked with yellow arrows.
Figure 11. Fretting corrosion on the bearing’s outer ring mating surface – marked with yellow arrows.
Energies 17 06490 g011
Figure 12. Size of material discontinuity.
Figure 12. Size of material discontinuity.
Energies 17 06490 g012
Figure 13. Scheme of loads and supports.
Figure 13. Scheme of loads and supports.
Energies 17 06490 g013
Figure 14. Numerical model with loads and constraints.
Figure 14. Numerical model with loads and constraints.
Energies 17 06490 g014
Figure 15. Results of FEM analysis—stress results according to the Huber–Mises hypothesis (Mpa).
Figure 15. Results of FEM analysis—stress results according to the Huber–Mises hypothesis (Mpa).
Energies 17 06490 g015
Figure 16. Results of FEM analysis—stress results according to the Huber–Mises hypothesis (Mpa).
Figure 16. Results of FEM analysis—stress results according to the Huber–Mises hypothesis (Mpa).
Energies 17 06490 g016
Figure 17. Direction of crack propagation.
Figure 17. Direction of crack propagation.
Energies 17 06490 g017
Table 1. Percentage composition of elements in the material of the outer ring of the bearing.
Table 1. Percentage composition of elements in the material of the outer ring of the bearing.
ElementFeCrMnSiCuNiMoP
Max98.221.101.000.35--0.250.04
[%]96.601.451.090.410.290.080.030.00
Min95.000.800.400.15--0.150.00
Table 2. Mechanical properties of AISI 6150 alloy steel (1.8159/51CrV4).
Table 2. Mechanical properties of AISI 6150 alloy steel (1.8159/51CrV4).
PropertiesConditions
T (°C)Treatment
Density (×1000 kg/m3)7.7–8.0325
Poisson’s Ratio0.27–0.3025
Elastic Modulus (GPa)190–21025
Tensile Strength (MPa)667.425Annealed at 815 °C
Yield Strength (Mpa)412.325Annealed at 815 °C
Elongation (%)23.025Annealed at 815 °C
Reduction in Area (%)48.425Annealed at 815 °C
Hardness (HB)19725Annealed at 815 °C
Impact Strength (J)27.425Annealed at 815 °C
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maślak, P.; Przybyłek, G. The Method for Assessing the Causes of Damage to a Bearing in a Rotary Air Preheater. Energies 2024, 17, 6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246490

AMA Style

Maślak P, Przybyłek G. The Method for Assessing the Causes of Damage to a Bearing in a Rotary Air Preheater. Energies. 2024; 17(24):6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maślak, Paweł, and Grzegorz Przybyłek. 2024. "The Method for Assessing the Causes of Damage to a Bearing in a Rotary Air Preheater" Energies 17, no. 24: 6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246490

APA Style

Maślak, P., & Przybyłek, G. (2024). The Method for Assessing the Causes of Damage to a Bearing in a Rotary Air Preheater. Energies, 17(24), 6490. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop