1. Introduction
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a widely used technique to fabricate high-quality thin films and coatings, crucial in industries such as semiconductors, photovoltaics, and advanced materials [
1]. It involves the chemical reaction of precursors of the vapor phase on a heated substrate, forming a thin solid film [
2]. The versatility and precision of CVD make it essential for producing thin films with excellent uniformity, purity, and adhesion.
CVD’s importance in thin-film deposition is especially pronounced in the semiconductor industry, where it is crucial for the manufacturing of integrated circuits and other microelectronic devices [
3]. Thin films created through CVD are crucial for forming active layers, insulating barriers, and conductive pathways in these components. The precise control of film thickness on the nanometer scale and the ability to achieve excellent step coverage in complex topographies are vital for the miniaturization and enhancement of the performance of semiconductor devices [
4].
Beyond semiconductors, CVD is widely used in the production of photovoltaic cells [
5], where thin films of materials such as silicon, cadmium telluride, and copper indium gallium selenide are deposited to create efficient solar cells. In optics, CVD is used to deposit antireflective coatings, optical filters, and waveguides [
6]. Additionally, aerospace and defense industries use CVD to produce wear-resistant and corrosion-resistant coatings, improving the durability and performance of critical components [
7].
The widespread use of CVD in various high-tech industries highlights its importance. The ability to precisely control the chemical composition and microstructure of thin films through process parameter adjustments allows for the creation of materials with properties tailored to specific applications. This flexibility makes CVD a valuable tool for technological advancement and innovation [
8].
The effectiveness of CVD processes is strongly dependent on the dynamics of heat and mass transfer. Accurate modeling of these phenomena is crucial for optimizing the deposition process, ensuring uniform film thickness, and achieving the desired material properties [
9].
Heat transfer in CVD involves the conduction, convection, and radiation of thermal energy to and from the substrate and the reactor walls [
10]. Maintaining the substrate at an optimal temperature is essential to promote the desired chemical reactions while avoiding thermal degradation or stress [
11]. Inconsistent temperature distribution can lead to non-uniform film growth, defects, and reduced material performance [
12]. Therefore, understanding and controlling heat transfer is fundamental to producing high-quality thin films.
Mass transfer involves the transport of gaseous precursors to the substrate surface and the removal of by-products from the reaction zone. Efficient mass transfer ensures uniform delivery of reactants to the substrate, promoting consistent deposition rates and film composition [
13]. Factors such as gas flow dynamics, precursor concentration, and reactor design significantly impact mass transfer. Poor mass transfer can result in precursor depletion, incomplete reactions, and non-uniform deposition [
14].
This review provides a thorough examination of recent advances in heat and mass transfer modeling for CVD processes. The intricate interplay between heat transfer, mass transfer, and chemical reactions within the CVD environment requires sophisticated modeling to accurately predict film growth and properties. This review covers a broad range of CVD systems, including thermal CVD, plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD), and metal-organic CVD (MO CVD). Each system presents unique challenges and opportunities in terms of heat and mass transfer, and this review highlights specific modeling techniques and solutions developed for each. In addition to fundamental aspects of heat and mass transfer, this review explores various modeling methodologies, ranging from analytical models and empirical correlations to advanced numerical simulations. It discusses the advantages and limitations of different approaches and their applicability to different CVD processes and materials. Computational models that incorporate fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and kinetics can simulate different reactor designs, precursor chemistries, and operating conditions, helping researchers and engineers optimize processes. These models help predict deposition rates, film uniformity, and material properties, reducing the need for extensive experimental trials.
Advances in numerical methods, such as finite element analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and multiscale modeling techniques, are highlighted for their role in enhancing model accuracy and efficiency. These models account for gas-phase reactions, surface kinetics, and thermodynamic properties, providing a comprehensive understanding of the deposition process. This review also explores the latest developments in computational tools, focusing on the integration of CFD, multiphysics simulations, and machine learning techniques to improve model accuracy and predictive capabilities. Case studies and recent research examples illustrate the practical implementation of these models and their impact on process optimization.
By synthesizing existing knowledge and identifying gaps in current research, this review aims to provide a roadmap for future studies and innovations in the field. It serves as a valuable resource for researchers and engineers looking to improve the modeling of heat and mass transfer in CVD systems.
2. Fundamentals of CVD
To apply thin ceramic coatings that enhance wear resistance under friction conditions, two entirely different vapor phase deposition processes are typically used [
15]: chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD). In the CVD process, a coating of reaction products is generated on the substrate through a chemical reaction occurring in the gas phase, usually carried out at atmospheric pressure. CVD-produced coatings are uniform, even on the surfaces of complex-shaped products [
16]. The substrate temperature is higher in CVD processes compared to PVD [
17]. For example, when a TiN layer is produced by chemical deposition, the temperature is approximately 1000 °C, while in the physical process, it is around 500 °C. In chemical vapor deposition, layers are formed on the surface of a heated material as a result of a chemical reaction in the gas phase. Therefore, the production of CVD layers is a continuation of thermochemical treatment processes in a gas atmosphere, especially diffusion metallization.
During the CVD process, reactive gaseous substrates, usually with a carrier gas, flow around the substrate, and the coating is formed by decomposition of the reactive gas mixture on the treated surface and incorporation of released metal atoms or chemical compounds into the layer [
18]. There are three main stages in the process [
19]:
- −
Production of a chemical compound of the applied element with high volatility (easily evaporating);
- −
Transport of gas (vapor) from the forming compound to the place of deposition without its disintegration;
- −
The chemical reaction necessary to produce a coating on the surface of the product.
Chemically, vapor deposition layers are the result of a chemical reaction on the surface of a heated substrate. Therefore, the basic condition of the process is the availability of a chemical compound of the applied element that vaporizes at a reasonably low temperature and decomposes upon contact with the substrate, leading to the formation of the element or chemical compound [
20].
Figure 1 shows the transport and reaction processes that take place during CVD.
Table 1 presents the numerical data in tabular form as well as formulae for calculations of chemical vapor deposition processes.
The deposition rate DR is influenced by the Avogadro number NA, the universal gas constant R, the temperature T, the pressure P, and the activation energy Ea. The diffusion coefficient D can be determined experimentally or from literature values. The gas flow rate F and reactant gas concentration C are process parameters controlled during the CVD process. The activation energy (Ea) of the CVD process is typically determined by experimental methods. For determining Ea, the following steps are considered:
Experimental setup—conduct a series of deposition experiments at different temperatures while keeping other parameters constant (e.g., pressure, gas flow rate). Measure the deposition rate (DR) at each temperature.
Data collection—record the deposition rates (DR) and the corresponding temperatures (T).
Arrhenius plot—use the Arrhenius equation which relates the deposition rate to temperature:
where
A—pre-exponential factor,
R—the universal gas constant,
T—the absolute temperature in Kelvin.
Linear regression—plot ln (DR) against 1/T on a graph. The plot should yield a straight line if the process follows the Arrhenius behavior. The slope of the line can be used to calculate the activation energy.
Calculation of the activation energy.
The CVD process is used to produce layers from metallic and non-metallic materials as well as their compounds, including carbides, nitrides, borides, and oxides [
21,
22].
Charges are placed on graphite or nickel trays. The reducing and diluting gas, usually dry hydrogen, is introduced into the reactor simultaneously with the start of heating the charge. Once the charge reaches the process temperature, reactive components are supplied to the chamber. During the process, the gaseous components introduced into the reactor react on the surface of the workpiece, forming a coating and gaseous reaction products. In many CVD processes, gases such as hydrogen peroxide (HF) or HCl are formed during the reactions, which are neutralized by passing them through chemical or cryogenic traps. The CVD coating deposition cycle, including heating and cooling of the products, is long and can take up to 12 h. Therefore, it is practical to install a separate reactor for each type of coating composition, e.g., one for TiC/TiN and another for TiC/Al2O3. In this way, contamination of the chamber with substances other than those used to produce the specific type of layer is avoided.
The reactions that occur in gaseous substrates and lead to the formation of coatings require an energy source. Different variants of the CVD process differ in the type of energy source used, resulting in variations in the properties of the produced coatings. Typical energy sources include the hot surface of the coated products, and direct or alternating current plasma at radio frequency or microwave frequency. Sometimes, the heat from the combustion of process gases serves as an energy source, such as the combustion of acetylene during the CVD process to produce diamond-like coatings [
23]. The chemical reactions that occur in the thermal CVD process on the surface of the product between gaseous reagents are thermally activated. Therefore, to ensure that the process progresses at a satisfactory rate, a temperature higher than 900 °C is usually required. The plasma CVD process allows for a significant reduction in temperature in the range of 300–700 °C. However, the use of metal-organic compounds allows the process temperature to be reduced even further, to around 500 °C. Low-temperature processes enable the production of layers on substrates made of materials with low melting points, and materials that undergo phase transformations above the deposition temperature. The low deposition temperature of plasma CVD limits the stresses caused by the large difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the substrate and the coating. This primarily limits the tendency for deformation and cracking during the cooling of the product from the coating production temperature to room temperature.
The CVD process can be performed under atmospheric pressure conditions (100 kPa) [
24,
25] or under reduced pressure conditions (0.1–6.6 kPa) [
26]. The process is practically applicable when the chemical reactions that occur ensure that a coating of the required thickness of 5–15 μm can be achieved within a reasonable time of 5–6 hours. The rate of chemical reactions and the deposition rate in the CVD process increase exponentially with temperature, according to the Arrhenius equation [
24]. Therefore, high-temperature processes are preferred from a kinetic standpoint. However, high temperature adversely affects the substrate, causing changes in its microstructure and mechanical properties.
Since the mechanical properties of the substrate are crucial, significant effort has been made to find chemical reactions that allow the CVD process to be conducted at relatively low temperatures. The temperature at which the substrate is heated during the process usually ranges from 600 to 1100 °C. This temperature is sufficient to cause significant and often undesirable changes in the microstructure of the steel. Therefore, heat treatment is necessary after the process to ensure the required microstructure and properties of the substrate. The development of CVD processes is driven by the objective of reducing the deposition temperature. One of the low-temperature processes is plasma-assisted CVD [
27].
CVD processes are used to produce coatings made of metals, ceramics, diamond, and diamond-like layers. This method can produce coatings from metals that cannot be deposited electrolytically and have high melting points, such as W, Mo, Re, Nb, Ta, Zr, and Hf. Refractory metals are deposited at temperatures significantly below their melting or sintering temperatures. Diamond and diamond-like layers, chemically deposited from a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and hydrocarbons, have properties similar to natural diamond [
28]. Currently, CVD processes are used primarily to produce cutting tools’ coatings. The coatings produced are usually multilayered, using the best properties of each layer material [
29]. For example, a TiN layer provides a low friction coefficient and resistance to galling, while an Al
2O
3 layer is characterized by high oxidation resistance and high-temperature stability, which is beneficial when the cutting speed is high [
30]. Meanwhile, the TiC and Ti(C,N) layers provide high resistance to abrasive wear under friction conditions [
31].
The advantage of the CVD process is the ability to deposit coatings on partially obscured surfaces, such as the internal surfaces of small-diameter holes (<1 mm). As in other processes, a strong bond between the coating and the substrate is only possible if the surface of the substrate is clean and free from oil and grease residues, oxides, and other contaminants [
19].
The high substrate temperature promotes the mutual diffusion of atoms from the substrate into the coating and vice versa. Therefore, the bond between the coating and the substrate produced by a high-temperature process is a strong metallic bond. However, when the atoms of the layer form brittle intermetallic phases with the atoms of the substrate, such mutual diffusion is undesirable because it reduces mechanical properties and leads to delamination of the coating. To avoid this, diffusion barriers are used in the form of interlayers made of materials that do not form brittle phases with either the substrate or the deposited outer coating. In some applications, multilayer CVD coatings are beneficial. They not only provide good adhesion to the substrate and limit mutual diffusion, but also allow advantageous changes in mechanical, chemical, and physical properties across their cross-section [
32]. For example, on carbide tools, three successive layers are deposited in the order from the substrate: titanium carbide, titanium carbonitride, and titanium nitride. This coating shows significantly greater durability compared to a single-layer coating. Sometimes, ten-layer coatings are used.
The microstructure of the coatings produced by the CVD process usually consists of columnar grains, although equiaxed grains typically form at the beginning of the process (near the surface of the product) [
33,
34]. The type of microstructure and grain size are significantly dependent on the processing conditions [
35]. Often, the most desirable microstructure does not form at a high deposition rate. Therefore, it is necessary to balance the cost criteria of the process (high deposition efficiency) with the microstructure that ensures good tribological properties.
Coatings formed during the CVD process result from the absorption of deposited atoms on the substrate surface, their migration across the substrate surface, and the formation of clusters of atoms by the adsorbed atoms. These clusters, upon reaching a critical size by the addition of new atoms, become grain nuclei. A significantly higher growth rate of grains in the direction parallel to the substrate surface than in the perpendicular direction to the substrate surface leads to the formation of a thin, dense coating layer with a well-defined structure and surface topography. Grain nucleation on the substrate is heterogeneous, so the cleanliness of the substrate, its roughness, and its crystalline structure greatly influence the nucleation and growth of the grains, as well as the microstructure and surface topography of the coating [
36].
In general, the microstructure of the coating and the topography of its surface depend on the following [
37,
38]:
The process temperature, which affects the mobility of atoms;
Supersaturation;
Duration of the process;
Pressure in the chamber;
Gas flow rate (laminar or turbulent);
Spatial position of the substrate in the chamber;
Substrate surface preparation.
Generally, an increase in the reaction temperature and the duration of the process increases the volume fraction of the crystalline structure while decreasing the amorphous fraction. Similarly, reducing the gas flow rate and the degree of supersaturation has the same effect. The grains in the immediate vicinity of the substrate are very small, about 1 μm in size. However, at a distance of approximately 1 μm from the substrate, the grains achieve much larger sizes. Grains with a favorable crystalline orientation grow faster and eliminate grains with less favorable orientations that grow more slowly. Additionally, grain growth is energetically easier compared to the nucleation of new grains on the surface of the growing layer. In the coating zone away from the substrate, a microstructure of equiaxed or columnar grains can be distinguished.
Increasing the deposition temperature changes the topography of the exterior surface of the coating. A relatively low temperature and short deposition time lead to the formation of a coating with a surface roughness of about 1 μm with characteristic spherical protrusions. Increasing the temperature or time causes needle-shaped grains to begin dominating the surface of the coating. Further increasing the deposition temperature or prolonging of the time promotes the formation of a coarse-grained equiaxed microstructure.
CVD can be classified according to three parameters [
39]:
- −
Operating conditions (atmospheric pressure CVD (APCVD), low pressure CVD (LPCVD), and ultrahigh vacuum CVD (UHVCVD));
- −
Physical characteristics of vapor (aerosol-assisted CVD (AACVD) and direct liquid injection CVD (DLICVD));
- −
Substrate heating (hot-wall CVD, and cold wall CVD).
The different practices for the application of chemical vapor deposition processes for various technical applications are shown in
Table 2.
3. Heat Transfer Modeling
Heat transfer modeling is crucial for optimizing chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes because it directly impacts the quality and properties of thin films. The primary objective is to ensure uniform temperature distribution across the substrate, which is essential for consistent deposition rates and uniform film thickness. Temperature variations can lead to defects, stress, and variations in material properties.
Heat transfer models help design CVD reactors and processes that maintain stable thermal environments, promoting high-quality film deposition. These models help determine optimal process conditions such as substrate temperature, precursor flow rates, and reactor pressure. By simulating various thermal scenarios, researchers can identify conditions that maximize deposition efficiency while minimizing energy consumption and material waste, which is vital for scaling up from laboratory to industrial production.
Thermal gradients within the reactor affect deposition processes, growth rates, and film morphology. Accurate modeling allows for better control of these factors. Proper temperature control prevents premature precursor decomposition and ensures complete chemical reactions, thereby avoiding poor film quality. In addition, modeling helps design controlled heating and cooling protocols to mitigate thermal stress, cracking, and delamination.
Heat transfer modeling is essential for designing and scaling up CVD reactors by evaluating different configurations for effective thermal management. It often integrates with other multiphysics models, including mass transfer, fluid dynamics, and chemical kinetics, providing a comprehensive understanding of the CVD process. This integration helps optimize gas flow patterns, temperature distribution, and precursor delivery.
Effective heat transfer management improves energy efficiency, reduces consumption, and improves sustainability by identifying energy saving opportunities and minimizing the environmental impact of CVD operations.
Heat transfer modeling plays a crucial role in CVD processes by enabling precise control and optimization of the temperature distribution, which is essential to achieve uniform thin-film coatings and high-quality material growth. For example, the performance of SiC devices is highly dependent on the material quality of SiC substrates, which are influenced by heat and mass transfer within the CVD reactor [
41]. Numerical simulations and modeling help to understand the complex interactions of fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and surface reactions, which are critical to predicting and controlling the deposition process [
42]. Modeling has been used to evaluate new reactor concepts for SiC bulk growth, demonstrating the impact of gas flow and temperature distribution on the deposition area [
43]. Additionally, reactor geometry, such as a cone top configuration, can significantly affect gas flow patterns and deposition rates, reducing non-uniformity in film thickness [
9]. The temperature distribution on the wafer surface is another critical factor that influences chemical reactions during the CVD process. Models have shown significant temperature drops in narrow gaps between the wafer and heater under low-pressure conditions [
44]. In applications such as X-ray anodes, heat transfer modeling optimizes the design for better thermal management, reducing maximum temperatures in critical components [
45]. Furthermore, CVD processes in-line for coating optical fibers benefit from coupled radiation and convection heat transfer models to predict temperature profiles and improve coating uniformity [
46]. Numerical models also ensure the stability and uniformity of substrate heating, which is vital for the deposit of oxide semiconductor layers containing nanoparticles [
47]. In general, heat transfer modeling integrates thermodynamic, kinetic, and transport data to link the properties of the film with the process parameters, highlighting its indispensable role in the advancement of CVD technology [
48].
Recently, there has been increasing interest in using various modeling tools to simulate heat transfer in CVD processes. These approaches include continuum models (based on finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD)), molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), hybrid approaches, and multiphysics modeling. FEA involves breaking down a complex geometry into smaller, simpler parts called finite elements. It solves the governing equations of heat transfer, mass transfer, and structural mechanics for each element and then assembles the results to obtain a comprehensive solution. CFD focuses on solving fluid flow equations to simulate the behavior of gases in the CVD process. It uses numerical methods to solve the Navier–Stokes equations for fluid flow and incorporates models for heat and mass transfer. MD simulates the behavior of atoms and molecules over time using Newton’s equations of motion. It provides insights into the interactions and mechanisms at the atomic level in the CVD process. LBM is a numerical approach that models fluid dynamics using discrete lattice grids and simplified kinetic models. It solves the Boltzmann transport equation on a lattice grid to simulate fluid flow.
Table 3 presents the most important information on individual methods and their application in the context of CVD processes.
The following sections will analyze selected solutions developed over the last decade.
3.1. Continuum-Based Approaches
The study of continuum-based models in heat transfer during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes has seen significant advancements over the last decade, with various research papers contributing unique insights and methodologies.
3.1.1. Finite Element Analysis
The finite element analysis (FEA) has been extensively applied to model heat transfer during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, offering various advantages and facing certain limitations.
The modeling of CVD processes using the FEA involves several detailed steps to ensure accurate simulation of the complex phenomena occurring during the deposition process. The following steps outline the typical approach based on the gathered literature:
Defining the geometry and meshing—defining the geometry of the reactor and the substrates where the deposition takes place. This includes creating a computational grid or mesh that represents the physical domain.
Setting up the physical and chemical models—specifying the governing equations for fluid flow, heat transfer, mass transport, and chemical reactions. For CVD, these typically include the Navier–Stokes equations for fluid dynamics, energy equations for heat transfer, and species transport equations coupled with reaction kinetics.
Boundary and initial conditions—appropriate boundary conditions such as inlet velocities, temperatures, and species concentrations are applied. Initial conditions for temperature and species concentrations within the reactor are also set to start the simulation.
Simulation of gas-phase reactions—the gas-phase reactions are modeled to simulate the dissociation of precursor gases and the formation of reactive intermediates. This includes the use of a microwave frequency electric field for processes like MPA-CVD to facilitate gas discharge plasma.
Surface reactions and film growth—the reactions at the substrate surface and the subsequent film growth are modeled to understand the deposition rates and uniformity. Parameters like temperature and pressure are controlled to optimize film properties.
Coupling multiscale models—for detailed analysis, multiscale modeling is used to link macro-scale reactor models with micro-/nano-scale surface models. This approach helps in predicting the growth of nano-/micro-roughness on the film surface and its properties.
Validation and optimization—the simulation results are validated against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Sensitivity analysis and optimization techniques are used to refine the process parameters for better performance and efficiency.
The study by Lisik et al. [
49] involves the numerical modeling of a CVD reactor using ANSYS CFX software 14.5. The primary goal is to evaluate numerical approaches for simulating heat and mass transfer within the reactor chamber. The process simulated involves the growth of thin films through the deposition of materials from gaseous reactants onto a substrate. This is crucial in semiconductor manufacturing and other industrial applications requiring thin-film coatings. The model is developed in three dimensions, covering the reactor chamber bounded by its walls, electrodes, and gas inlet and outlet tubes. The specific dimensions of the modeled structure are detailed but not explicitly listed in a tabular form. Boundary conditions used in the study of Lisik et al. are the following:
Adiabatic boundary condition—no heat transfer through the chamber walls; heat removal is solely by the gas flow.
Convective boundary condition—heat exchange with the surroundings occurs; modeled with a typical heat transfer coefficient and reference temperature.
Isothermal boundary condition—surfaces are maintained at a constant temperature.
Radiative heat exchange—included in some simulations to account for thermal radiation effects within the chamber.
The study concludes that the developed numerical model accurately represents the heat and mass transfer processes within the CVD reactor. Key findings include the following:
Convection on the chamber walls is the dominant mode of heat removal;
Radiative heat exchange significantly affects temperature distribution, particularly far from the susceptor;
The numerical results closely match experimental measurements, validating the model’s accuracy.
Houston and Sime developed a self-consistent model for hydrogen plasma in MPA-CVD reactors, highlighting the practical performance of the discontinuous Galerkin method. However, the complexity of the model posed implementation difficulties [
50].
Sime’s thesis on MPA-CVD reactors introduced automatic code generation for DG finite element formulations, simplifying the implementation process, though the approach remains prone to human error [
51].
Cheimarios et al. reviewed multiscale models for CVD, stressing the need to link different scales to optimize the process, particularly for patterned and flat surfaces [
52].
Zhou and Hsieh’s work on FDM, a related additive manufacturing process, demonstrates the reliability of numerical modeling in predicting thermal responses and bonding mechanics, which can be analogous to CVD processes [
53].
Khanafer et al. further explore FDM by developing a 3D computational model to analyze transient heat transfer and inter-layer adhesion, validated against experimental data, suggesting potential applications in CVD modeling [
54].
Gabrielli et al. reviewed strategies to reduce computational effort in FEA of rolling-element bearings, which can be adapted to optimize CVD reactor simulations by balancing accuracy and computational load [
55].
Kleimanov et al. developed a numerical model using COMSOL Multiphysics to ensure substrate temperature stability and uniform layer deposition in a CVD reactor for oxide semiconductor layers containing gold nanoparticles [
47].
Aranganadin et al. discussed the design of a 3D MPECVD chamber using FEM to achieve accurate simulation results by incorporating multiple physical interfaces [
56].
Stupple et al. used FEA to model heat transfer in a water-cooled copper-based X-ray anode with a CVD diamond heat spreader, demonstrating significant temperature reduction [
45].
Table 4 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the FEM method.
3.1.2. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Modeling CVD processes using CFD involves several critical steps to simulate and analyze the deposition mechanisms accurately. These steps ensure the detailed prediction of flow behavior, chemical reactions, heat transfer, and deposition rates within the reactor. These steps are as follows:
Geometry and mesh generation—defining the reactor geometry and creating a computational mesh. The geometry includes the entire CVD reactor setup, such as the substrate, gas inlet, and outlet. A fine mesh is generated, often using hexahedral elements, to capture the spatial details accurately.
Defining physical models—specifying the governing equations for fluid flow, heat transfer, and mass transport. The Navier–Stokes equations for fluid dynamics, energy equations for heat transfer, and species transport equations for chemical reactions are defined. CFD models incorporate detailed reaction kinetics, including homogeneous gas-phase reactions and heterogeneous surface reactions.
Boundary and initial conditions—appropriate boundary conditions, such as inlet velocities, temperatures, species concentrations, and wall conditions, are applied. Initial conditions for temperature and species concentrations within the reactor are also set. These conditions are crucial for starting the simulation and ensuring accurate results.
Simulation of flow and heat transfer—CFD model simulates the flow and heat transfer within the reactor. This includes the behavior of the gas flow, temperature distribution, and heat transfer mechanisms.
Chemical reactions and species transport—model includes detailed chemical reactions occurring in the gas phase and on the substrate surface. The transport of reactant species and the formation of products are simulated. User-defined functions are often used to model specific reactions, such as SiCl4 oxidation in the MCVD process.
Validation and calibration—simulation results are validated against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Parameters such as reaction rates, diffusion coefficients, and thermal properties are calibrated to match the experimental observations.
Optimization and analysis—sensitivity analysis and optimization techniques are used to refine the process parameters for improved performance. The CFD model can perform computational experiments to identify the rate-limiting steps, whether diffusion or reaction kinetics. This helps in optimizing the reactor design and operating conditions for better film uniformity and deposition rates.
The last decade has seen significant advancements in the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to model heat transfer during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, as evidenced by the reviewed papers.
The study by Peng et al. [
57] involves the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the flow and heat transfer within a tungsten crucible CVD reactor. The simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent 19.1 to optimize the performance and structure of the reactor. The simulated process involves the deposition of tungsten using a CVD reactor, where tungsten hexafluoride (WF
6) is reduced by hydrogen (H
2) to deposit tungsten. This process is crucial for producing high-density, high-purity tungsten coatings and parts. The geometric model of the CVD reactor includes an outer cylinder and a heated susceptor. The detailed dimensions are as follows:
Height: 920 mm;
Outer cylinder diameter: 600 mm;
Susceptor diameter: 300 mm;
Susceptor height: 750 mm.
Boundary conditions are as follows:
Susceptor heating wall temperature: 873 K;
Outer cylinder wall initial temperature: 300 K;
Operating pressure: 1 atm;
WF6 mass flow: 20 L/min;
H2 mass flow: 60 L/min;
Initial inlet temperature: 300 K.
The study concludes that the CFD simulations provide valuable insights into the internal flow and heat transfer characteristics of the tungsten crucible CVD reactor. Key findings include the following:
The upper gas inlet mode results in a more uniform and reasonable temperature distribution, which is conducive to tungsten deposition;
Both axial and radial heat convection occur between the susceptor and the outer wall, with axial convection being more intense;
The molar ratio of H2 to WF6 significantly impacts the tungsten deposition rate, and excess H2 is not favorable for deposition;
Thermal radiation has a considerable impact on temperature distribution and cannot be ignored.
Lee et al. highlighted the importance of considering slip-flow regimes and heterogeneous reactions to accurately simulate heat transfer and hydrogen generation in HFCVD processes, emphasizing the correlation between gas temperature and hydrogen concentration gradients on substrates [
58].
Libreros et al. discussed the complementary nature of theoretical, experimental, and CFD methods in optimizing flat fin heat exchangers, which is relevant for CVD reactor design [
59].
Tran et al. demonstrated the use of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) to reduce the complexity of CFD models in CVD processes, making them more computationally efficient [
60].
Passos et al. explored the synthesis of polymeric biomaterials in a vertical CVD reactor, using CFD to optimize heat and mass transfer for uniform material deposition [
61].
Silva et al. used CFD steady-state simulations to determine the hydrodynamic and thermal properties of the flow field in a modified CVD process, achieving good agreement with reference studies [
62].
Zhou et al. employed the sliding mesh method in CFD to study the real-time dynamics of transport phenomena in MO CVD, finding that susceptor moving speed significantly affects film uniformity [
63].
CFD simulations using a three-dimensional hexahedral mesh and finite volume method have been employed by Park et al. to solve momentum, continuity, energy, and chemical species equations, showing good agreement with reference studies [
64].
Table 5 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the CFD method.
3.2. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations
Modeling CVD processes using MD involves several detailed steps to simulate the atomic-level interactions and behaviors during deposition. The key steps involved in this modeling approach are the following:
Initialization of the simulation system—create an initial configuration of atoms that represents the substrate and the gas-phase species involved in the deposition process. This involves defining the types of atoms, their initial positions, velocities, and any initial chemical bonds.
Potential energy function—selecting an appropriate interatomic potential function (force field) is crucial. The potential energy function describes how atoms interact with each other.
Simulation of gas-phase dynamics—the gas-phase molecules are introduced into the simulation domain, and their dynamics are simulated using MD. This involves solving Newton’s equations of motion for the atoms, taking into account the forces derived from the potential energy function. The behaviors of gas molecules, such as their diffusion and interaction with the substrate, are modeled.
Surface reactions and deposition—as the gas-phase species reach the substrate, surface reactions occur, leading to the deposition of material. The MD simulation tracks these reactions in real time, capturing the formation and breaking of chemical bonds.
Temperature and pressure control—the simulation maintains the desired temperature and pressure conditions, which are critical for accurate modeling of CVD processes. This can be achieved using thermostat and barostat algorithms. The temperature influences the kinetic energy of atoms and the reaction rates on the substrate.
Analysis of deposition and film growth—the properties of the deposited film, such as its density, structure, and anisotropy, are analyzed.
Validation and comparison—the simulation results are compared with experimental data to validate the model. Parameters like deposition rate, film thickness, and structural properties are compared to ensure the accuracy of the MD simulation.
The last decade has seen significant advancements in the application of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to model heat transfer during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. These simulations have been pivotal in understanding and optimizing the multiscale nature of CVD, which involves complex interactions from the macroscopic reactor scale to the atomic scale of the deposited films [
52].
For instance, MD simulations have been employed to predict the behavior of supercritical CO
2 in heat transfer applications, highlighting the importance of accurate thermal coefficients and the challenges associated with the mutability of supercritical properties [
65].
In the context of CVD, MD has been used to simulate the sulfurization of MoO
3 by H
2S/H
2 mixtures, revealing critical reaction pathways and intermediates that enhance the quality of MoS
2 layers [
66].
Additionally, the development of constant chemical potential molecular dynamics (CμMD) has provided new insights into concentration-driven processes, such as crystallization and surface adsorption, which are fundamental to CVD [
67]. The study employs constant chemical potential molecular dynamics (CμMD) simulations to model non-equilibrium concentration-driven processes. This method involves applying concentration-dependent external forces to regulate the flux of solute species between selected subregions of the simulation volume, thereby maintaining a constant chemical potential. The primary processes simulated in this study include crystallization, surface adsorption, permeation through porous materials, and nucleation. These simulations aim to maintain a steady-state concentration gradient, essential for accurately studying concentration-driven phenomena such as phase transitions and adsorption. The simulation setup varies depending on the specific process being studied. For example, in crystallization simulations, the model typically includes a crystal growth region surrounded by a control region (CR) and a force region (FR) that maintain the desired concentration. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Control Region (CR)—concentration of solute species is kept constant to simulate an open system;
Force Region (FR)—external forces are applied to regulate the concentration of solute species;
Transition Region (TR)—delimits the area where the concentration gradient is established;
Periodic Boundary Conditions (PBCs)—applied to simulate an infinite system and avoid finite-size effects.
The study concludes that the CμMD technique effectively models various concentration-driven processes, providing insights that are difficult to achieve with traditional molecular dynamics simulations. The conclusions include the following:
Accurate growth rate calculations and equilibrium shape predictions were obtained;
The method correctly characterizes adsorption thermodynamics on porous or solid surfaces;
Simulations of permeation through porous materials provided new insights into membrane selectivity and efficiency;
The spherical implementation of CμMD enabled the study of nucleation processes, overcoming limitations of finite-size effects.
Overall, the integration of MD simulations with other computational techniques has significantly improved the design, analysis, and optimization of CVD processes, paving the way for the development of novel materials and more efficient reactors.
Table 6 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of application of the MD simulations.
3.3. Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM)
The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) has significantly advanced in modeling heat transfer during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, leveraging its mesoscopic approach to handle complex boundaries and parallelization effectively. This method models fluid flow using fictive particles, which simplifies the integration of thermodynamics into transport equations and enhances its flexibility in dealing with multiphase flows, making it highly suitable for CVD applications [
68].
Modeling CVD processes using the LBM involves several detailed steps to simulate fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and species transport in the reactor. Modeling with LBM includes the following steps:
Initialization and geometry setup—define the computational domain, which includes the geometry of the reactor and the substrates. The domain is discretized into a lattice grid where each node represents a fluid particle.
Lattice Boltzmann Equation (LBE)—the core of LBM involves solving the discrete Boltzmann equation on the lattice grid. This equation describes the evolution of particle distribution functions that represent the probability of particles moving in certain directions with specific velocities. The multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) model is often used for better numerical stability and accuracy.
Boundary and initial conditions—appropriate boundary conditions, such as inlet velocities, temperatures, and species concentrations, are applied. Initial conditions for the distribution functions, temperature, and species concentrations within the reactor are set to start the simulation.
Simulation of fluid flow and heat transfer—the LBM solves the Lattice Boltzmann Equation for fluid flow and heat transfer. The method inherently captures the coupling between flow and thermal fields, making it suitable for simulating the complex interactions in CVD processes.
Chemical reactions and species transport—the transport and reactions of precursor gases are modeled using the LBM. The method tracks the distribution of species across the lattice grid and models the chemical reactions that lead to deposition on the substrate.
Coupling with nucleation and growth models—in addition to the LBM for fluid and species transport, nucleation and growth models are integrated to simulate the deposition process. These models account for the formation of nuclei on the substrate and their subsequent growth into a thin film. The morphology of the deposited film can be studied by considering factors like precursor supply and surface roughness.
Validation and analysis—the simulation results are validated against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Parameters such as deposition rate, film thickness, and surface morphology are compared.
Recent studies have demonstrated the LBM’s efficiency in simulating 3D liquid–vapor-phase changes and heat transfer in irregular geometries, which are prevalent in CVD reactors [
69,
70].
The Immersed Boundary-LBM (IB-LBM) has shown particular effectiveness in modeling radiative heat transfer in 2D irregular geometries, highlighting its potential for handling the complex geometries encountered in CVD processes [
71]. LBM is used to discretize the radiative heat transfer equation in absorbing and emitting media, while the immersed boundary method (IBM) models the boundaries of irregular geometries. The process simulated involves radiative heat transfer in complex 2D geometries. The study focuses on modeling how radiation interacts with irregular boundaries, which is crucial for understanding heat transfer in high-temperature industrial applications with complex geometrical shapes. The computational domain uses a uniform grid for spatial discretization, and specific details of grid size depend on the geometry being modeled. Examples are as follows:
A 2D square enclosure is used with a grid size of 0.01 m × 0.01 m;
The number of Lagrangian points on the boundaries ensures that the distance between points is less than the length of the Eulerian lattice.
Boundary conditions are as follows:
Radiative equilibrium mode—the temperature of all boundaries is known, and the medium’s temperature field is computed to maintain radiative equilibrium.
Isothermal media mode—the medium within the enclosures is kept at a constant temperature, with cold boundary walls.
Radiative density term—an additional term based on radiation intensity difference is included to satisfy boundary conditions at the immersed boundaries.
The study concludes:
The results of IB-LBM are in good agreement with other numerical methods like the finite volume method (FVM) and discrete ordinates method (DOM);
The IB-LBM provides a simpler and faster computational approach compared to traditional methods for irregular geometries;
The method performs well in optically thick media but shows instability in optically thin media;
The IB-LBM can be extended to combine radiative heat transfer with other heat transfer modes in complex geometries.
Additionally, LBM’s capability to simulate natural convection and entropy generation in non-Newtonian fluids under magnetic fields has been explored, providing valuable insights into optimizing heat transfer in CVD reactors [
72].
The development of multiple-relaxation-time LBM approaches have further improved the efficiency and accuracy of simulations, making it a promising candidate for 3D liquid–vapor-phase change modeling in CVD [
73].
Moreover, the method’s application in predicting heat transfer and phase change in multi-layer deposition processes has been validated against experimental data, underscoring its reliability [
74].
LBM’s intrinsic second-order accuracy and efficient interface treatments for conjugate heat transfer make it a robust tool for modeling thin layers in CVD processes [
75].
LBM has been successfully applied to model the drying of colloidal suspensions, enhancing heat conduction in nanoparticle deposition, which is analogous to the fine control required in CVD processes [
76].
Bibliometric analysis of LBM research indicates a growing focus on multiscale models and hybrid methods, which are crucial for accurately capturing the multiscale nature of CVD processes. Overall, LBM’s unique advantages, such as easy handling of complex geometries, parallel simulations, and continuous development, make it a powerful tool for advancing the understanding and optimization of heat transfer in CVD processes.
The paper by Łach et al. introduces a heat flow model based on the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) for phase transformation, which can be adapted to simulate the heat transfer in CVD processes due to its capability to handle complex boundaries and phase changes [
77].
Svyetlichnyy et al. discuss the development of a platform for 3D simulation of additive layer manufacturing, highlighting the importance of accurately modeling the changes in the state of matter. This is crucial for CVD, where precise control of temperature and reactant flow impact the quality of the deposited layers [
78].
The application of cellular automata and LBM in additive layer manufacturing presented by Svyetlichnyy et al. provides a framework that can be leveraged for modeling the deposition and heat distribution in CVD, ensuring uniform layer formation [
79].
Finally, Łach and Svyetlichnyy (2024) present a 3D model of carbon diffusion during diffusional phase transformations, which can be directly applied to model mass transfer during CVD, enhancing the understanding of reactant diffusion and product layer growth [
80].
Table 7 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the LBM method.
4. Mass Transport Modeling
Mass transport modeling is a critical component in the analysis and optimization of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. It involves understanding and predicting the movement and distribution of reactant gases, intermediates, and by-products within the CVD reactor. This modeling is essential for controlling the deposition of thin films on substrates, ensuring uniformity, quality, and efficiency.
Mass transport modeling helps analyze how reactant gases flow through the reactor, including understanding laminar or turbulent flow regimes, flow patterns, and how these affect the distribution of reactants near the substrate surface. The boundary layer, the thin region adjacent to the substrate where the gas velocity changes from zero (at the substrate) to the free stream value, significantly influences mass transport. Modeling the boundary layer helps predict local deposition rates.
The shape and dimensions of the CVD reactor impact gas flow and reactant distribution. Mass transport models assist in designing reactor geometries that promote uniform gas distribution and efficient reactant delivery to the substrate. Proper placement and design of gas inlets and outlets ensure that reactants are evenly distributed and by-products are efficiently removed, minimizing dead zones and enhancing film uniformity.
Mass transport modeling helps determine the concentration profiles of reactants within the reactor, crucial for predicting local deposition rates on the substrate, which depend on the availability of reactants at the surface. Temperature gradients within the reactor affect reaction kinetics and mass transport properties. Models that incorporate thermal effects can predict how temperature variations influence the deposition rate and uniformity.
Achieving uniform film thickness across the substrate is critical for high-quality coatings. Mass transport models identify the conditions that lead to uniform reactant distribution and deposition rates. By manipulating mass transport parameters, it is possible to influence film characteristics such as thickness, composition, grain size, and stress, leading to improved film quality.
When scaling up from laboratory to industrial scale, maintaining process consistency is challenging. Mass transport models help understand how changes in reactor size affect gas flow and deposition rates, enabling effective scale-up. Models can guide the adjustment of process parameters such as flow rates, pressures, and temperatures to maintain optimal conditions during scale-up.
Efficient use of reactants is critical for cost-effective and environmentally friendly CVD processes. Mass transport models optimize reactant flow to maximize utilization and minimize waste. By optimizing heat and mass transfer, models help design processes that require less energy for heating and maintaining the desired reactor conditions.
Mass transport modeling is often integrated with thermal, chemical reaction, and fluid dynamics models to provide a comprehensive understanding of the CVD process. This holistic approach captures the interplay between different physical phenomena. Combining mass transport with chemical kinetics and thermal analysis enhances the accuracy of predictions regarding film properties and process outcomes.
Mass transport modeling is indispensable in the development, optimization, and scaling of CVD processes. It enables a detailed understanding of reactant distribution, gas flow dynamics, and deposition mechanisms. By providing insights into how reactants and by-products move and interact within the reactor, mass transport models facilitate the design of more efficient reactors, improve film quality, and ensure uniform deposition. This modeling is essential for achieving high-performance CVD processes, reducing waste, and enhancing overall process efficiency.
Mass transport modeling plays a crucial role in CVD processes by providing insights into the complex interactions between fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and chemical reactions, which are essential for optimizing deposition quality and efficiency. These models help elucidate the basic mechanisms of multi-species transport and their interplay with gas and surface reactions, as seen in the development of 3D CFD models for pyrocarbon deposition [
81]. The integration of mass transport with chemical kinetics models, such as those for carbon-coated optical fibers, allows for the optimization of coating quality by validating different reactor models under various conditions [
82]. Mass transport modeling also addresses the challenges of uniform precursor concentration and convective mass transport in reactors, as demonstrated in studies on pulsed-pressure CVD systems [
83]. Furthermore, these models are essential for predicting growth rates and doping non-homogeneity in SiC epitaxial growth processes, aiding in the development of new CVD processes [
84,
85]. The application of reduced-order models [
60], such as the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) method [
86], significantly reduces the complexity of the governing equations, making it feasible to control transport processes more efficiently. Overall, mass transport modeling is indispensable for advancing CVD technology, enabling precise control over deposition parameters and enhancing the quality and uniformity of the deposited films [
87].
Table 8 presents the most important information about the approaches to the mass transport modeling in the context of CVD processes.
4.1. Diffusion-Based Models
Diffusion-based models, particularly those leveraging stochastic differential equations (SDEs), have shown significant promise in various domains, including the modeling of complex processes like chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Fishman et al. introduced novel approaches to diffusion models constrained by inequality metrics, relevant for applications like robotics and protein design, which can potentially be adapted for precise control in CVD environments [
88]. Yang et al. provided an extensive survey of diffusion models, categorizing them into efficient sampling, improved likelihood estimation, and data structure handling, highlighting their broad applicability and potential enhancements for CVD processes [
89]. These studies collectively illustrate how diffusion-based models can be optimized and adapted to improve the precision and efficiency of CVD processes, leveraging advancements in computational techniques and theoretical frameworks. The following subsections present selected solutions in this area.
4.1.1. Fick’s Laws of Diffusion
Fick’s laws of diffusion are pivotal in modeling chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, as they describe the transport mechanisms essential for material deposition. The first law, which relates the diffusive flux to the concentration gradient, and the second law, which predicts how diffusion causes concentration to change over time, are instrumental in designing and optimizing CVD systems.
Modeling CVD processes using Fick’s laws of diffusion involves several detailed steps to describe the diffusion-driven transport of chemical species within the reactor and their subsequent deposition on the substrate. In this modeling approach, the following steps can be considered:
Defining the geometry and mesh generation—define the geometry of the reactor and the substrates. This includes creating a computational grid or mesh that represents the physical domain. For example, in a typical CVD reactor, the geometry would include the gas inlet, the reaction chamber, and the substrate on which the deposition occurs.
Setting up the governing equations—the core of this modeling approach is Fick’s first and second laws of diffusion. Fick’s first law describes the flux of species due to concentration gradients, while Fick’s second law describes the time-dependent change in concentration due to diffusion.
Initial and boundary conditions—define the initial concentration distribution of reactants within the reactor and the boundary conditions at the reactor walls and substrate surface. For instance, the initial condition could be a uniform concentration of reactants in the gas phase, and boundary conditions could include zero flux at the walls and a specific reaction rate at the substrate surface.
Reaction kinetics—incorporate the reaction kinetics of the chemical species at the substrate surface. The deposition rate on the substrate is often governed by surface reactions, which can be described by rate equations that depend on the concentration of the reactants.
Numerical solution—solve the coupled partial differential equations (PDEs) for diffusion and reaction using numerical methods. This typically involves discretizing the equations using finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods and solving them iteratively. Various numerical schemes can be used to ensure stability and accuracy, especially for stiff reaction terms.
Simulation of transient and steady-state behavior—conduct simulations to study both transient and steady-state behavior of the CVD process. Transient simulations capture the evolution of concentration profiles over time, while steady-state simulations provide the final deposition profile and thickness uniformity.
Validation and optimization—validate the simulation results against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Sensitivity analysis and optimization techniques can be used to refine the process parameters for improved film uniformity and deposition rates.
Sibatov and Sun discusses the generalized Fick’s laws in the context of fractional operators, describing dispersive transport in disordered semiconductors, relevant for advanced CVD process modeling [
90]. The modeling is based on the generalized Fick’s laws, incorporating various fractional time operators such as Riemann–Liouville, Caputo–Fabrizio, and Atangana–Baleanu operators. The primary process simulated is the dispersive transport of charge carriers in disordered semiconductors, studied through the time-of-flight (ToF) method. This method involves measuring the transient current response following the injection of charge carriers by a short laser pulse under a strong electric field to minimize space charge effects. The simulations involve a finite width sample. For the ToF experiments, the system geometry is typically coplanar, suited for thin films and nanostructured systems. The model considers multiple scenarios with different fractional operators to analyze the impact on transport dynamics. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Electric field—a strong electric field is applied to eliminate space charge effects;
Initial condition—charge carriers are generated near the electrode by a short laser pulse;
Fractional operators—various fractional operators are used to model different types of anomalous diffusion.
Key findings include the following:
Riemann–Liouville Operator—the transient current shows a power-law decay, indicating typical dispersive transport behavior;
Tempered Fractional Operator—the current decay is truncated, showing a smoother transition to normal transport;
Caputo–Fabrizio Operator—transient current decays exponentially, requiring special tuning of carrier generation in ToF experiments;
Atangana–Baleanu Operator—shows initial plateau in transient current, suppressing the power-law decay initially observed.
Paul et al. introduce Fick’s laws, detailing the derivation and solutions of the second law for various conditions, which are crucial for estimating diffusion coefficients in CVD processes [
91].
Poirier and Geiger apply Fick’s laws to the diffusion of chemical species through a phase due to concentration gradients, offering essential insights for modeling diffusion in materials used in CVD processes [
92].
Donev et al. explore a mesoscopic model of diffusion in liquids, highlighting the importance of thermal fluctuations and random advection in addition to Fick’s laws, enhancing our understanding of diffusion in CVD processes at different scales [
93].
Cheimarios et al. emphasize the multiscale nature of CVD, illustrating how Fick’s laws are applied at different scales to model the diffusion and deposition of thin films. Their work reviews various methodologies and the transfer of information between scales, highlighting the complexity of accurately modeling CVD processes [
52].
Andreucci et al. extend Fick’s laws to inhomogeneous media, relevant for CVD processes involving spatially varying properties. They discuss the geometric interpretation of reversibility and hydrodynamic scaling, providing insights into the macroscopic behavior of diffusion in CVD [
94].
Additionally, Gavriil et al. critically assess the application of Fick’s laws in food packaging, which parallels the challenges in CVD processes by addressing complex transport phenomena and environmental interactions [
95].
Philipse discusses Brownian motion and diffusion equations, explaining how particle positions and orientations evolve over time, which is foundational for understanding diffusion in CVD processes [
96].
These studies underscore the significance of Fick’s Laws in providing a foundational understanding of diffusion in CVD and similar processes.
Table 9 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of application of Fick’s laws of Diffusion.
4.1.2. Boundary Layer Approaches
Boundary layer approaches are crucial in the modeling of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, as they help in understanding the transport phenomena near the substrate surface where deposition occurs. These approaches allow for detailed analysis of the kinetics, transport, and reaction mechanisms within the boundary layer.
Modeling CVD processes using boundary layer approaches involves several steps to capture the detailed behavior of fluid flow, heat transfer, mass transport, and chemical reactions within the thin boundary layer near the substrate surface. The boundary layer approach simplifies the complex three-dimensional flow by focusing on the critical region where deposition occurs. Taking into account this approach, the following steps can be considered:
Defining the geometry and meshing—defining the reactor geometry and generating a computational mesh, focusing particularly on the regions near the substrate where the boundary layer forms. For example, in a typical CVD reactor, the geometry would include the gas inlet, reaction chamber, and the substrate.
Formulate the governing equations—the key equations used in boundary layer modeling include the Navier–Stokes equations for fluid flow, the energy equation for heat transfer, and species transport equations for mass transfer.
Initial and boundary conditions—appropriate initial and boundary conditions are applied. The initial conditions could be a uniform temperature and concentration of reactants in the gas phase. Boundary conditions typically include no-slip conditions for velocity at the substrate, specified temperature, and species concentrations at the substrate surface, and convective boundary conditions at the inlet.
Reaction kinetics and surface reactions—the deposition rate on the substrate is governed by surface reaction kinetics. These rates depend on the local concentrations of reactants and temperature at the substrate surface.
Solve the simplified equations—the simplified boundary layer equations are solved numerically using methods like finite difference, finite element, or finite volume techniques. These methods discretize the equations and solve them iteratively to obtain the velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles within the boundary layer.
Analysis of deposition profiles—the results from the boundary layer model provide the local deposition rates and the resulting film thickness profile. These profiles are analyzed to understand the uniformity and quality of the deposited film.
Validation and optimization—the simulation results are validated against experimental data to ensure accuracy. The validated model can be used to optimize process parameters like temperature, pressure, and reactant flow rates to achieve desired film properties. Sensitivity analyses can be performed to identify critical parameters influencing the deposition process.
Lukashov et al. propose an analytical model for the deposition of thermal barrier coatings (TBC) via metal-organic CVD (MO CVD), using the reacting boundary layer model to analyze the diffusion combustion of precursors and evaluate coating growth rates and precursor efficiency [
97]. The simulated process involves the deposition of 7YSZ (7 wt% Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia) thermal barrier coatings. The deposition is modeled as a combustion of Zr(dpm)4 and Y(dpm)3 precursors in the presence of an oxygen-argon flow. The precursors decompose upon reaching the heated substrate, forming ZrO
2 and Y
2O
3 coatings. The model considers a boundary layer formed by the reagent flow around a flat wall. The dimensions and specific geometry of the boundary layer are defined in the context of a laminar flow regime, with assumptions about the molecular diffusion coefficients being the same for all substances involved. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Temperature—substrate temperature is higher than 600 °C, indicating a diffusion regime of combustion;
Gas flow—the reagent mixture includes Zr(dpm)4, Y(dpm)3, argon, and oxygen. The argon serves as the carrier gas, while oxygen acts as the reactant gas;
Stoichiometric ratios—the reaction front is modeled assuming complete consumption of the reactants to form solid oxides directly on the substrate surface.
The study concludes the following:
The coating growth rate stabilizes at high oxygen mole fractions, independent of further increases in oxygen content;
The model effectively describes the influence of precursor concentration and substrate temperature on coating growth;
The results are consistent with experimental data, validating the assumptions of the reacting boundary layer model.
Zhang et al. investigate the impact of boundary layers on the deposition rates and characteristics of polycrystalline silicon in a CVD process using trichlorosilane and hydrogen, highlighting the importance of controlling boundary layer thickness to enhance deposition uniformity and quality [
98].
Aghajani et al. study the deposition of SiC on C/C composites using CVD, exploring the deposition kinetics by varying process parameters such as time, temperature, and precursor composition, and employing boundary layer theory to understand the deposition rates and coating characteristics [
99].
Boi et al. examine the growth of Fe-filled carbon nanotubes using boundary layer chemical vapor synthesis, a method that exploits random fluctuations within the viscous boundary layer, discussing how tangential and perpendicular growth modes affect the synthesis process [
100].
Kleimanov et al. present a numerical model of a CVD reactor used for producing oxide semiconductor layers, aiming to ensure uniform substrate heating and layer deposition by simulating the induction heating process and analyzing the impact of the boundary layer on deposition uniformity [
47].
Sayevand and Machado address singularly perturbed fractional differential equations displaying boundary layer behavior, introducing a novel operational matrix technique to approximate solutions, enhancing the accuracy and stability of boundary layer models, which is vital for predicting deposition rates in CVD processes [
101].
Timms and Purvis present a one-dimensional model for the initiation of shear bands in reactive materials, using boundary layer analysis to identify key physical properties controlling the reactive shear banding process, providing insights into localized plastic deformation relevant for understanding stress effects in CVD processes [
102].
Table 10 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the boundary layer approaches.
4.2. Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) Simulations
Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations are a powerful tool for modeling chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, offering detailed insights into the physicochemical phenomena occurring at various scales. KMC methods are particularly advantageous for studying deposition processes due to their ability to address larger time and spatial scales compared to molecular dynamics (MD) and provide a more detailed approach than continuum-type models [
103].
Modeling CVD processes using the Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) method involves several steps to simulate the atomic-scale mechanisms and dynamics of the deposition process:
Initialization—define the initial configuration of the simulation system, which includes the substrate and the gas-phase species involved in the deposition process. The system is discretized into a lattice where each site can be occupied by an atom, molecule, or remain empty.
Defining event types—identify and define the possible events that can occur during the CVD process. These events include adsorption, desorption, surface diffusion, nucleation and growth, surface reactions.
Event selection and probability calculation—for each type of event, calculate the probability of its occurrence based on the system’s current state and predefined rate constants. These probabilities are often determined using Arrhenius-type expressions that depend on factors like temperature and activation energy.
Time evolution—use the KMC algorithm to evolve the system over time. The algorithm involves selecting an event, updating the system, advancing the time.
Simulation of growth dynamics—the KMC simulation tracks the temporal evolution of the system, capturing the stochastic nature of atomic-scale processes. It allows the study of growth dynamics, including the formation of thin films and surface morphologies.
Analysis and validation—analyze the simulation results to extract meaningful insights, such as film thickness, surface roughness, and growth rates. Compare the results with experimental data to validate the model and refine the parameters if necessary.
Chen et al. propose an all-atom KMC model to simulate the growth of graphene on a Cu substrate, including essential atomistic events such as deposition, diffusion, and attachment of carbon species, successfully predicting various graphene morphologies and growth kinetics [
104]. The primary process simulated is the growth of graphene on a Cu(111) substrate. This involves the decomposition of carbon-containing gas molecules (e.g., methane or ethene) into carbon species (CHx, where x = 0–3) that dissolve and diffuse on the substrate to form graphene nuclei. The nuclei grow further with the attachment of these carbon species to the domain edges. The dimensions of the simulation box are 213 × 246 Å
2, comprising 20,000 sites. An initial circular graphene nucleus with a diameter of 4 nm is placed at the center of the substrate surface. The lattice constant of the 2D hexagonal graphene lattice is 2.46 Å. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Deposition flux (F)—carbon species are deposited at a specified flux rate. The model considers varying deposition fluxes (0.1 ML s−1 to 10 ML s−1);
Growth temperature (T)—simulations are conducted at different temperatures (e.g., 800 °C to 1000 °C);
Energy barriers—energy barriers for various atomistic events (e.g., surface diffusion, attachment, detachment, and edge diffusion) are obtained from first-principles calculations.
The study concludes that the KMC model successfully predicts various graphene morphologies observed experimentally, such as compact hexagonal, dendritic, and circular domains. The conclusions include the following:
The dominance of carbon dimers as the feeding species is confirmed, with their concentration depending on the growth flux and temperature;
The model captures the transition from compact hexagonal to fractal shapes with increasing deposition flux or decreasing growth temperature;
The model provides insights into the growth kinetics and mechanisms, enabling controlled synthesis of graphene with desired morphologies.
Pineda and Stamatakis present the basic principles, computational challenges, and successful applications of KMC simulations in heterogeneous catalysis. Their work highlights the integration of first-principles calculations with KMC to accurately model reactions over surfaces, which is critical for designing novel catalysts used in CVD processes [
105].
Cheimarios et al. present modern applications of Monte Carlo and KMC models in deposition processes, including physical and chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, and electrochemical deposition [
106].
Papanikolaou and Stamatakis discuss the fundamentals and applications of KMC simulations in modeling reactions on catalytic surfaces, reviewing the principles of KMC simulations and their relevance in heterogeneous catalysis and CVD processes [
107].
Rodgers et al. present a three-dimensional KMC model to simulate diamond CVD, including adsorption, etching, lattice incorporation, and surface migration events. The model accurately reproduces experimental growth rates and provides insights into growth mechanisms under different conditions [
108].
Osman and Mitra simulate the growth of polymer films on two-dimensional surfaces using KMC, modeling the initial growth of Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition (iCVD) surface reactions, assuming room temperature substrates and specific reactor pressures. The simulation results are compared with experimental data for initial growth, demonstrating the potential of KMC in modeling polymer film deposition [
109].
Heiber introduces Excimontec, a Python package for simulating ionic transport properties in crystalline materials using KMC. The tool aids in understanding and optimizing organic semiconductor devices by modeling the behavior of excitons and polarons in semiconductor layers, relevant for CVD processes [
110].
Edward and Johnson use an atomistic multi-lattice KMC model to understand defect generation in multi-layered graphene caused by the adsorption and diffusion of epoxy groups. The simulations reveal the temperature and pressure dependencies of defect formation, providing insights into the role of epoxy diffusion in CVD processes [
111].
Agarwal et al. introduce the QSD-KMC approach for modeling state-to-state dynamics in complex systems, such as biomolecular dynamics. The method retains time resolution even in highly non-Markovian dynamics, which can be applied to CVD processes to model long timescale reactions and state transitions [
112].
Table 11 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of application of the Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations.
4.3. Multiscale Modeling Techniques
Multiscale modeling of mass transport during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) involves integrating various scales to accurately predict and optimize the deposition process.
Modeling CVD processes using multiscale modeling techniques involves integrating models at various scales to accurately capture the phenomena occurring at different levels, from macroscopic reactor scales to microscopic and atomic scales. The key steps involved in a multiscale modeling approach are the following:
Defining the problem and setting objectives—define the goals of the simulation, such as optimizing film uniformity, understanding deposition mechanisms, or predicting material properties. This step involves identifying the key physical and chemical processes that need to be modeled at different scales.
Macroscopic reactor-scale modeling—at this scale, models are developed to simulate the overall behavior of the CVD reactor. This includes fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and mass transport of the precursor gases. The governing equations typically used are the Navier–Stokes equations for fluid flow, energy equations for heat transfer, and species transport equations for mass transport.
Meso-scale modeling—this intermediate scale bridges the gap between the macroscopic and microscopic scales. It involves simulating phenomena such as surface diffusion, nucleation, and growth of thin films. Techniques like phase-field modeling can be used to simulate the evolution of microstructures during film growth.
Microscopic and atomic-scale modeling—at this scale, models capture atomic-level interactions and chemical reactions. Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are commonly used to model surface reactions, adsorption/desorption processes, and atomic-scale diffusion.
Coupling and integration—integrate the models from different scales to enable information flow between them. For instance, the results from the reactor-scale CFD model (e.g., species concentration and temperature profiles) can be used as input for the meso-scale phase-field model, which in turn provides boundary conditions for the atomic-scale KMC or MD simulations.
Validation and calibration—validate the integrated multiscale model against experimental data to ensure its accuracy. This involves comparing simulation results with experimental measurements of film thickness, morphology, and other properties. Calibration may be required to adjust model parameters for better agreement with experimental data.
Simulation and optimization—perform simulations using the validated model to explore the effects of different process parameters (e.g., temperature, pressure, gas flow rates) on the deposition process. Use the model to optimize these parameters for desired film properties.
At the macroscopic level, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are employed to simulate the complex reacting flow within the CVD reactor, capturing the transport phenomena and temperature-dependent physical properties to understand the interplay between gas and surface reactions. This is complemented by mesoscale models that link reactor-scale heat and mass transport equations with phase-field equations to predict the morphology and distribution of synthesized materials, such as 2D materials like MoS2. At the microscopic level, models focus on the detailed surface chemistry and the effects of micro-topography on species consumption, as seen in the deposition of silicon from silane on trenched wafers. Multiscale approaches also involve coupling different software packages to handle large-scale transport-reaction models and small-scale reactive precursor gas models, ensuring that fast reaction processes are accurately represented without losing critical information [
52].
Momeni et al. developed a multiscale model linking CVD control parameters to the morphology, size, and distribution of synthesized 2D materials. The model couples reactor-scale heat and mass transport equations with mesoscale phase-field equations to predict and control the growth morphology of 2D materials like MoS
2. The framework is experimentally validated, demonstrating its capability to optimize growth conditions [
113]. The simulation includes the dynamics of gas flow, heat transfer, precursor diffusion, and the nucleation and growth of MoS
2 islands on a substrate. The computational model involves a 3D simulation of the growth chamber, with specific dimensions for the reactor setup. For PFM simulations, the 2D region is discretized into 3600 × 3600 grid points, representing a 3.6 mm × 3.6 mm region in real size. This large-scale FEM model captures the concentration distribution of precursors and temperature profiles within the chamber. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Gas flow—laminar flow of carrier gas (Ar) and precursor gases (MoO3 and sulfur).
Temperature—heating zones maintained at specific temperatures (800 °C and 725 °C) for different simulation scenarios.
Deposition rate—spatially varying deposition rate based on precursor concentration calculated from FEM.
No-slip boundary condition—applied to the substrate surface to model the interaction between the gas flow and the solid surface.
Key findings include the following:
Precursor concentration—high precursor concentrations lead to higher nucleation densities and larger island sizes.
Growth instabilities—observed in regions with high concentration gradients, leading to non-uniform island shapes.
Experimental validation—the model accurately replicates experimental observations, demonstrating the predictive capability for optimizing CVD growth parameters.
Geiser proposed a multiscale model based on two different software packages. The large scales are simulated with CFD software based on the transport-reaction model (or macroscopic model), and the small scales are simulated with ordinary differential equations (ODE) software based on the reactive precursor gas model (or microscopic model) [
114].
Table 12 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of multiscale modeling.
4.4. Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches
Modeling CVD processes using machine learning (ML) and data-driven approaches involve several steps to integrate experimental data, simulate the deposition process, and optimize parameters for desired outcomes:
Data collection and preprocessing—gather extensive experimental data on the CVD process, including process parameters such as temperature, pressure, gas flow rates, precursor concentrations, and resulting film properties like thickness, uniformity, and morphology. These data must be cleaned and preprocessed to remove noise and handle missing values.
Feature selection and engineering—identify the most relevant features (input variables) that influence the CVD process outcomes. Feature engineering may involve creating new features from existing data to better capture underlying patterns. For example, combining temperature and gas flow rate into a single feature that represents the thermal budget.
Model selection and training—choose appropriate machine learning algorithms to model the relationship between process parameters and deposition outcomes. Common algorithms include linear regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, and neural networks. Train the model using a portion of the collected data, ensuring that the model learns the underlying patterns without overfitting.
Validation and hyperparameter tuning—validate the trained model using a separate validation dataset to ensure its accuracy and generalizability. Hyperparameter tuning is performed to optimize the model’s performance by adjusting parameters such as learning rate, tree depth, or number of neurons.
Model evaluation and interpretation—evaluate the model’s performance using metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), R-squared, or classification accuracy, depending on the type of model. Interpret the model to understand the influence of different features on the deposition outcomes. Techniques like feature importance or SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values can be used for this purpose.
Prediction and optimization—use the trained model to predict deposition outcomes for new sets of process parameters. Optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms or gradient-based methods can be employed to find the optimal set of parameters that achieve desired film properties.
Experimental validation—validate the model predictions and optimized parameters through experimental trials. Compare the experimental results with the model predictions to ensure consistency and refine the model if necessary.
Deployment and continuous improvement—deploy the model for real-time prediction and control of the CVD process in a production environment. Continuously collect new data and update the model to maintain its accuracy and adapt to any changes in the process conditions.
Machine learning (ML) and data-driven approaches have been increasingly applied to model mass transport in chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes, offering enhanced predictive capabilities and optimization potential.
Koronaki et al. presented an equation-free, data-driven approach for reduced order modeling of CVD processes, utilizing the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) method and artificial neural networks (ANN) for model development, with the support vector machine (SVM) classification algorithm used to identify clusters of data corresponding to different process states [
115]. The simulated process involves the epitaxial growth of thin films in a vertical CVD reactor. The study focuses on the competition between free convection, due to the temperature difference between the heated wafer and the incoming gases, and forced convection due to the gas flow rate. This competition leads to the multiplicity of steady states. The computational domain is two-dimensional, taking advantage of axial symmetry. The mesh used in CFD computations consists of 15,066 cells. The ROM is built from a snapshot library of 735 vectors, with each vector containing 60,264 values of pressure, velocity components, and temperature at each discretization point. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Deposition temperature: 1200 K at the wafer;
Reactor walls temperature: maintained at 300 K;
Gas flow: nitrogen (N2) as the carrier gas;
Mass inlet flow rate—varies, with specific steps for different simulation scenarios to study the stability and multiplicity of states.
The study concludes the following:
Support vector machines (SVM) can be used to classify different states based on convection dominance;
The ROM reduces the computational complexity compared to full-scale CFD simulations, achieving high accuracy with minimal data;
The ROM predictions closely match the full CFD model results, with errors not exceeding 2.5%.
Xie and Stearrett studied benchmark data imputing, feature selection, and regression algorithms for ML-based CVD virtual metrology. They found that linear feature selection regression algorithms underfit the data, suggesting that a nonlinear feature selection and regression algorithm combined with nearest data imputing can achieve up to 70% prediction accuracy. This significantly reduces CVD processing variation and improves wafer quality, demonstrating ML’s potential in enhancing metrology in mass production [
116].
Costine et al. discussed an ML approach that uses data from published growth experiments to predict growth performance in unexplored parameter spaces. By leveraging literature data on MoS
2 thin films grown using CVD, the study employs unsupervised and supervised ML methods to uncover design rules that classify monolayers and guide future CVD experiments, optimizing growth conditions for desired microstructures and morphologies [
117].
Yoshihara et al. constructed an ML model to design experimental CVD conditions for forming large-area graphene. The model predicts graphene domain size from CVD growth conditions and spectral information of the Cu surface, demonstrating faster graphene growth compared to traditional methods. This approach highlights the efficacy of ML in optimizing CVD conditions for large-scale applications [
118].
Zeng et al. integrated ML with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to identify core factors influencing the phase composition of boron carbide deposits. By combining ML and CFD, the prediction error is significantly reduced, providing accurate predictions of the deposited boron–carbon ratio. This approach highlights the potential of ML in optimizing deposition conditions and understanding mass transport mechanisms [
119].
Khosravi and Zeraati modeled the length of CNTs prepared by floating catalyst CVD using hybrid artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene expression programming (GEP). The models consider various CVD parameters, with ANN-MPSO (modified particle swarm optimization) providing accurate predictions for CNT length. The results highlight the effectiveness of ML in predicting outcomes based on CVD process parameters [
120].
Dritsas and Trigka, focusing on cardiovascular disease prediction, demonstrated the efficacy of supervised ML techniques in handling complex datasets and improving prediction accuracy. The methodologies and insights can be adapted to optimize mass transport models in CVD processes [
121].
Table 13 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the machine learning and data-driven models.
5. Combined Heat and Mass Transfer Modeling
The complex modeling of heat and mass transfer in the CVD process is essential for optimizing the deposition process, ensuring high-quality film production, and achieving economic and environmental benefits. By leveraging advanced modeling techniques, researchers and engineers can design more efficient and effective CVD systems, leading to advancements in semiconductor technology and other fields that rely on high-quality thin films.
The coupling of heat and mass transfer in CVD processes is crucial because the temperature distribution affects the reaction rates, which in turn influence the concentration fields. Additionally, the exothermic or endothermic nature of the reactions can significantly alter the temperature field. The coupled equations can be solved using numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods.
Table 14 presents the most important information about the approaches to the combined heat and mass transfer modeling in the context of CVD processes.
5.1. Coupled Heat and Mass Transfer Equations
Modeling CVD processes using coupled heat and mass transfer equations involves several detailed steps to accurately simulate the transport phenomena and chemical reactions occurring in the reactor:
Defining the geometry and meshing—define the geometry of the CVD reactor, including the substrate, gas inlet, and outlet regions. The computational domain is then discretized into a mesh or grid, which can be structured or unstructured depending on the complexity of the geometry. This step is crucial for setting up the spatial resolution of the simulation.
Formulating governing equations—the core of the modeling approach involves formulating the coupled heat and mass transfer equations. These equations describe the conservation of energy, mass, and momentum in the reactor.
Initial and boundary conditions—specify the initial conditions for temperature, velocity, pressure, and species concentrations within the reactor. Boundary conditions are applied at the reactor walls, inlet, and outlet. Common boundary conditions include inlet boundary, outlet boundary, wall boundary.
Modeling surface reactions—surface reactions on the substrate play a crucial role in determining the deposition rate and film properties. These reactions can be modeled using appropriate reaction kinetics, often involving adsorption, desorption, and chemical reactions at the surface.
Numerical solution—discretize the governing equations using numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element, or finite volume methods. This step involves transforming the partial differential equations into algebraic equations that can be solved iteratively. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software like ANSYS Fluent (
https://www.ansys.com, accessed date: 30 June 2024), COMSOL Multiphysics (
https://www.comsol.com/, accessed date: 30 June 2024), or OpenFOAM (
https://www.openfoam.com/, accessed date: 30 June 2024) can be used for this purpose.
Simulation and convergence—run the simulation and monitor the convergence of the solution. Convergence criteria are typically based on residuals of the governing equations, ensuring that the solution reaches a steady state or a time-accurate transient state.
Post-processing and analysis—analyze the simulation results to extract meaningful insights. This includes examining temperature distributions, concentration profiles, flow patterns, and deposition rates. Visualization tools within the CFD software or external tools like ParaView can be used for this purpose.
Validation and calibration—validate the simulation results against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Calibration may be necessary to adjust model parameters and improve agreement with experimental observations. This step is crucial for building confidence in the model’s predictive capability.
Reznik et al. perform physical and mathematical simulations of SiC deposition in a porous carbon–carbon composite material. The results of parametric calculations of heat and mass transfer at macro- and microlevels are presented, analyzing the compaction of pore space by an SiC matrix depending on reaction medium parameters [
122]. The primary process simulated is the CVD of SiC into the pore spaces of a CCCM, intended for use as a heat shield material in aerospace applications. The CVD process involves the decomposition of monomethyl silane (CH
3SiH
3) to form an SiC matrix within the composite material. The simulation utilizes a detailed geometric model of the CVD reactor and the CCCM. The reactor is divided into 1,035,632 finite volumes, while the pore space of the CCCM is discretized into approximately 1,200,000 mesh cells. These cells are used to capture the complex geometry and ensure accurate simulation results. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Temperature—the temperature of the reactor and CCCM varies depending on the location and process conditions, with specific attention to maintaining the desired reaction temperatures.
Pressure—the reactor operates under vacuum conditions (0.1 Pa) to facilitate gas flow and reactions.
Gas flow—monomethyl silane is introduced into the reactor, and its flow rate is adjusted based on the size of the CCCM piece and the reaction kinetics.
Heat transfer—conduction, convection, and radiation heat transfer modes are considered within the reactor and CCCM.
Chemical reactions—the decomposition of monomethyl silane is modeled using the Arrhenius equation for reaction surfaces, capturing both heterogeneous and homogeneous reactions.
Key findings include the following:
The temperature fields in the CVD reactor are relatively homogeneous, which is crucial for consistent SiC deposition.
The rate of SiC deposition is influenced by the temperature and pore size, with optimal deposition occurring at around 880 K.
Complex vortex flows within the pore space significantly affect the uniformity and rate of SiC compaction.
The simulation helps determine optimal process parameters to achieve desired material properties, such as sufficient residual porosity and uniform compaction.
Kuvyrkin et al. construct a mathematical model describing the CVD process on a curvilinear plate. The model accounts for convective heat transfer, radiative heat transfer, and mass transfer during substance attachment to the surface. A numerical algorithm is proposed to find the temperature profile over time, with results and analysis provided for different materials. This model helps in understanding and optimizing deposition on complex geometries [
123].
Lukashov et al. propose an analytical model for the growth of thermal barrier coatings during metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MO CVD). The model considers the coating deposition process as independent global reactions of diffusion combustion under convection conditions on a permeable surface. The rate of coating growth and precursor efficiency are analytically evaluated, and the model’s accuracy is confirmed through comparison with experimental data [
97].
An et al. investigate the heat and mass transfer performance in a three-dimensional bell-shaped polysilicon CVD reactor. They analyze the distributions of velocity, temperature, and concentrations of key components, as well as the silicon deposition rate. The study finds that higher inlet velocities lead to more uniform distributions and better deposition performance, providing insights for reactor design optimization [
124].
Wejrzanowski et al. study the relationship between heat and mass transfer in a hot-wall CVD reactor and the epitaxial growth of SiC. The research focuses on achieving homogeneous film thickness by modeling heat and mass transfer distributions during the epitaxial growth process, providing valuable insights for reactor design and optimization [
41].
Raji and Sobhan develop a mathematical model for CNT synthesis through catalytic CVD. They use COMSOL software to solve the governing equations for momentum, energy, and mass transport, providing insights for optimal furnace design [
125].
Lisik et al. provide a numerical model of a CVD reactor validated against experimental data, focusing on heat and mass transfer [
49].
Table 15 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles in the field of the application of the coupled heat and mass transfer equations.
5.2. Phase Change Phenomena
Modeling CVD processes using phase change phenomena involves capturing the dynamics of vapor to solid transitions, which are critical for accurately simulating film growth and deposition rates. The detailed steps involved the following:
Defining the geometry and meshing—defining the geometry of the CVD reactor, including the substrate, gas inlet, and outlet regions. Create a computational grid or mesh to discretize the domain, ensuring high resolution in regions where phase change and deposition occur.
Formulating governing equations—develop the coupled equations that describe mass, momentum, energy, and species transport, incorporating terms that account for phase change.
Modeling phase change phenomena—incorporate models for phase change, such as nucleation, growth, and solidification processes.
Boundary and initial conditions—define appropriate boundary conditions, such as inlet gas flow rates, temperatures, and species concentrations. Specify initial conditions for temperature, species concentrations, and the presence of nuclei on the substrate.
Numerical solution—discretize the governing equations using numerical methods like finite difference, finite element, or finite volume techniques. Use computational tools such as ANSYS Fluent, COMSOL Multiphysics, or custom codes to solve these equations iteratively.
Phase-field modeling—employ phase-field models to capture the detailed morphologies and interface dynamics during phase change. This involves solving additional equations for the phase-field variable, which distinguishes between different phases (vapor, liquid, solid).
Simulation and convergence—run the simulation and monitor for convergence. Ensure that the solution reaches a steady state or time-accurate transient state, depending on the nature of the deposition process.
Post-processing and analysis—analyze the simulation results to extract insights into temperature distributions, concentration profiles, flow patterns, and deposition rates. Visualization tools within the CFD software or external tools like ParaView (
https://www.paraview.org/, accessed date: 30 June 2024) can be used to interpret the results.
Validation and calibration—validate the simulation results against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Adjust model parameters through calibration to achieve better agreement with experimental observations. This step is critical for ensuring the model’s predictive capability.
Leone et al. perform kinetic calculations of the chemical phenomena during the epitaxial growth of silicon carbide. The study focuses on the effects of precursor types and growth temperatures on the deposition process, considering gas-phase reactions and phase changes [
126].
Geiser and Arab develop a four-phase model for CVD processes, incorporating phase changes and transport phenomena to optimize the deposition of metallic bipolar plates [
127].
Jamshidi et al. use thermodynamic equilibrium calculations to model gas-phase species in a thermal plasma CVD reactor, considering ionic species and phase changes during polycrystalline diamond deposition [
128].
Vignoles provides a comprehensive review of modeling techniques for chemical vapor infiltration (CVI), including phase change phenomena, for the preparation of fiber-reinforced composites [
129].
Fashu et al. use a phase-field (PF) model to investigate the growth morphology of two-dimensional (2D) materials during CVD. The model, based on Burton–Cabrera–Frank (BCF) crystal growth theory, explores the effects of substrate temperature and concentration of absorbed atoms on the substrate. The results demonstrate that the rich morphology of 2D islands in CVD growth can be reproduced, showing transitions from dendritic to compact shapes with increasing substrate temperature [
130].
In a review article, Sabzi et al. discuss the factors influencing CVD system design, including substrate geometry, temperature, chemical composition, and deposition processes. The paper highlights the role of phase change phenomena, such as surface reaction kinetics, diffusion, and desorption, in determining the deposition rate and microstructure of ceramic coatings during CVD processes [
131].
Table 16 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles related to phase change phenomena.
5.3. Surface Reaction Kinetics
Modeling CVD processes using surface reaction kinetics involves a series of detailed steps to accurately simulate the chemical reactions occurring on the substrate surface, which govern the deposition rates and film properties:
Defining the geometry and meshing—defining the geometry of the CVD reactor, including the substrate, gas inlet, and outlet regions. The computational domain is discretized into a mesh or grid to allow for numerical simulation of the transport phenomena and surface reactions.
Formulating governing equations—develop the equations that describe the mass, momentum, energy, and species transport, incorporating terms for surface reaction kinetics.
Modeling surface reaction kinetics—incorporate detailed surface reaction mechanisms that describe the adsorption, desorption, and chemical reactions of precursor molecules on the substrate surface. These mechanisms are typically described by rate equations that depend on the surface concentration of reactants and temperature.
Initial and boundary conditions—specify the initial conditions for temperature, velocity, pressure, and species concentrations. Boundary conditions are applied at the reactor walls, inlet, and outlet. Typical boundary conditions include specified velocity, temperature, and species concentrations at the inlet, and pressure outlet or outflow conditions at the outlet.
Numerical solution—discretize the governing equations using numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element, or finite volume techniques. Computational tools like ANSYS Fluent, COMSOL Multiphysics, or custom codes are used to solve these equations iteratively.
Simulation of surface reactions—use kinetic models to simulate the surface reactions and predict the deposition rates. This involves solving the rate equations for surface reactions and integrating them with the transport equations to capture the interplay between surface chemistry and transport phenomena.
Simulation and convergence—run the simulation and monitor for convergence. Ensure that the solution reaches a steady state or time-accurate transient state, depending on the nature of the deposition process.
Post-processing and analysis—analyze the simulation results to extract insights into temperature distributions, concentration profiles, flow patterns, and deposition rates. Visualization tools within the CFD software or external tools like ParaView can be used to interpret the results.
Validation and calibration—validate the simulation results against experimental data to ensure accuracy. Adjust model parameters through calibration to achieve better agreement with experimental observations. This step is crucial for ensuring the model’s predictive capability.
Song et al. propose surface kinetic mechanisms for the epitaxial growth of SiC using methyltrichlorosilane (MTS) in a hydrogen environment, discussing the components of surface species and growth rates under different mechanisms [
132]. The MTS decomposes in the reactor to form intermediate species containing silicon, carbon, and chlorine, which subsequently contribute to the growth of the SiC film through surface reactions. The numerical model simplifies the reactor into a two-dimensional (2D) model, focusing on a horizontal hot-wall CVD reactor. The reactor has a deposition region where the temperature and gas flow conditions are critical for the simulation. The computational grid details are not explicitly provided, but it involves a sufficient resolution to capture the temperature and concentration gradients accurately. Boundary conditions are as follows:
Temperature—the substrate temperature is maintained at around 1200 °C, while the susceptor surface shows a temperature variation of about 145 °C.
Pressure—the reactor operates at a low pressure of 100 mbar to facilitate the deposition process.
Gas flow—the H2/MTS ratio is maintained at 30, with a gas flow rate of MTS at 20 sccm.
Flow and diffusion—the gas mixture in the reactor is treated as an ideal gas, and the flow is assumed to be laminar. Mass diffusion is modeled considering the species diffusion coefficients.
Key findings include the following:
CH3 is the most abundant active carbon surface species, occupying about 80% of the surface sites on the Si face.
The predicted growth rate is consistent with experimental data, although the initial kinetic mechanism overestimates the adsorption rates. Adjustments in the mechanism provide more accurate growth rate predictions.
The study highlights the importance of incorporating accurate surface reaction mechanisms and the impact of intermediate species on the deposition process.
Jansen discusses the processes involved in modeling surface reactions in CVD, including the use of lattice models to represent adsorption sites and defects. The study also covers the implementation of processes and the importance of reducing noise in Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations [
133].
Badran and Shi investigate the decomposition kinetics of 1-methylsilacyclobutane (MSCB) in a hot wire CVD reactor. Using vacuum ultraviolet laser single photon ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry, they determine the rate constants and activation energies for different decomposition pathways, highlighting the catalytic role of the tungsten filament in the reactor [
134].
Reinke characterizes the surface kinetics of titanium isopropoxide (TTIP) and water in HV-CVD, deriving activation energies for desorption, hydrolysis, and pyrolysis, and demonstrating the deposition of epitaxial barium titanate films at a low temperature of 400 °C [
135].
Reinke further investigates the surface reaction kinetics of TTIP in a high-vacuum CVD of titanium dioxide, providing quantitative predictions of precursor impinging rates and examining the activation energies of surface reaction steps [
136].
Sabzi et al. discuss the factors influencing CVD system design, focusing on surface reaction kinetics, diffusion, and desorption reactions [
131].
Muneshwar and Cadien present a first-order kinetic model for atomic layer deposition (ALD) reactions, simulating the effects of precursor exposure, post-precursor purge, reactant exposure, and substrate temperature on growth per cycle [
137].
Konar and Nessim, in a mini-review, focus on the synthesis of transition metal selenides using ambient-pressure CVD, emphasizing their application in energy storage and the influence of surface morphology on reaction kinetics [
138].
Yuesong Xiang et al. investigate the controlled synthesis of 2D magnetite nanosheets using CVD, emphasizing the importance of surface reaction kinetics in their formation [
139].
Tomasini details the role of surface energy and activation energy in determining the reaction kinetics in CVD processes, focusing on molecular hydrogen dissociative adsorption and precursor thermal decomposition [
140].
Zhao et al. discuss the tuning of crystal dimensions through growth temperature and hydrogen concentration, linked to surface reaction and mass transport mechanisms [
141].
Table 17 presents a summary of various aspects of selected articles related to surface reaction kinetics.
6. Challenges and Opportunities in CVD Modeling Including Heat and Mass Transfer Aspects
Recently, various articles have discussed the challenges and limitations in chemical vapor deposition (CVD) modeling, as well as future directions and opportunities.
Filho et al. describe the modeling challenges in scaling up AACVD processes, including the prediction of aerosol behavior, heat and mass transfer coefficients, and reaction rate constants under uncertainty [
142].
Lee et al. discuss technical challenges in MO CVD growth of 2D materials, emphasizing the need for control over nucleation and growth stages to enable practical applications [
143].
Jiang et al. highlight recent advances and challenges in the CVD growth of 2D vertical heterostructures, focusing on controllable synthesis, growth temperature, precursor design, and substrate engineering [
144].
Dong et al. present a theoretical framework for 2D material CVD synthesis, discussing challenges and opportunities in exploring CVD mechanisms to better understand 2D material synthesis [
145].
Qun Wang et al. focus on challenges in the controllable CVD fabrication of high-quality TMD films, emphasizing the importance of controlling precursor concentration, nucleation density, and oriented growth [
146].
Heat and mass transfer modeling for CVD processes presents both challenges and opportunities. Considering the challenges, the following points can be noted:
- ○
Modeling heat and mass transfer for CVD processes requires addressing complex interactions between different phases (gas and solid), necessitating advanced modeling techniques and considerable computational resources.
- ○
Achieving accurate modeling of flow fields is essential but challenging, as it requires accounting for heat transfer contributions from multiple phases.
- ○
The significant computational demands of accurate simulations present a major challenge, requiring the use of advanced hardware and optimization techniques, such as GPU acceleration.
- ○
Ensuring the accuracy and applicability of numerical models is challenging and necessitates extensive validation against experimental data, which can be resource-intensive. Without proper validation, the predictive power of these models is limited.
- ○
Incorporating advanced techniques such as fuzzy logic and artificial intelligence into CVD modeling can improve predictive capabilities. However, these methods require sophisticated implementation and validation, posing additional challenges.
Considering the opportunities, the following points can be noted:
- ○
Advanced simulation tools such as CFD facilitate the creation and validation of numerical models without requiring physical prototypes, potentially streamlining the design process and lowering costs.
- ○
CFD and other advanced modeling techniques provide significant opportunities for optimizing the design and performance of heat exchangers, which are crucial components in CVD processes.
- ○
Methods such as fuzzy logic-based models can effectively predict heat transfer coefficients, offering valuable tools for optimizing industrial processes and enhancing model accuracy.
- ○
Incorporating AI and machine learning into CVD modeling enhances predictive capabilities and optimizes process parameters by uncovering patterns not evident through traditional methods.
- ○
Real-time monitoring and control in CVD processes ensure optimal conditions, enhancing product quality and reducing material waste.
- ○
Collaboration among materials science, engineering, and computer science researchers can create more accurate CVD models, addressing the complex challenges of these processes.
- ○
Using dimpled surfaces can enhance heat transfer and reduce flow resistance, making CVD processes more efficient.
Considering the opportunities, it is worth focusing on parallel programming, which can significantly advance the modeling of CVD processes by providing the computational power necessary to tackle these systems’ inherent complexities. By enabling high-resolution, real-time, and scalable simulations, parallel programming enhances our ability to optimize and control CVD processes, paving the way for innovations in materials science and manufacturing. The potential roles and benefits include the following:
- ○
CVD processes involve multiscale phenomena, and parallel programming efficiently simulates these models by distributing tasks across multiple processors, allowing simultaneous solving of molecular dynamics and continuum mechanics equations.
- ○
CVD processes often involve solving large PDE systems for heat, mass, and momentum transfer. Parallel programming reduces computation time by dividing the domain into sub-domains and solving them concurrently, which is crucial for real-time process optimization and control.
- ○
Parallel programming distributes computational demands, enabling high-resolution simulations to capture detailed CVD process features like intricate temperature gradients and concentration profiles.
- ○
Conducting parametric studies on CVD outcomes is computationally intensive. Parallel programming allows simultaneous simulations with different parameters, drastically reducing time and crucially optimizing process parameters and product quality.
- ○
In advanced manufacturing, real-time control and monitoring of CVD processes are vital. Parallel computing enables real-time simulations and adjustments, ensuring the process stays within desired parameters and reduces defects.
- ○
As CVD models grow in complexity and size, scaling simulations across multiple processors is crucial. Parallel programming provides the scalability to handle larger models without exponentially increasing computation time.
- ○
CVD processes often involve coupled phenomena, like fluid flow and chemical reactions. Parallel programming allows simultaneous solving of these models, ensuring more accurate and realistic simulations.
Parallel programming can model the deposition of advanced materials, requiring detailed simulations of multicomponent systems. High-fidelity simulations optimize reactor design for better uniformity and efficiency in thin-film deposition. Combining parallel computing with machine learning enhances predictive modeling, enabling faster convergence to optimal conditions and more robust control strategies.
7. Conclusions
This review has provided an overview of recent advancements in heat and mass transfer modeling for chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. Through a comprehensive analysis of literature published over the past decade, several key findings and trends have emerged.
Firstly, significant progress has been made in developing sophisticated computational models that accurately capture the complex interplay of thermal, fluid, and chemical phenomena inherent in CVD processes. These models range from continuum-based approaches such as finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics to atomistic methods like molecular dynamics and Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. Each approach offers unique insights into different length and time scales, enabling a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms governing heat and mass transport.
Furthermore, advancements in numerical techniques, parallel computing, and high-performance computing have enabled the simulation of increasingly complex CVD systems with greater accuracy and efficiency. Coupled with experimental studies, these models have facilitated the optimization of process parameters, the prediction of deposition rates and film properties, and the exploration of novel materials and processes.
However, several challenges remain. The integration of experimental data with computational models continues to pose difficulties, particularly in reconciling discrepancies in spatial and temporal resolutions and ensuring the quality and consistency of experimental validation data. Additionally, the complexity of multiphysics interactions and the sheer scale of parameter spaces in CVD present ongoing challenges for model development and validation. The integration of detailed numerical values characteristic of CVD processes, such as deposition rates (0.1–10 nm/min), temperature ranges (300–1000 K), and pressure conditions (0.1–10 Torr), is essential for providing clearer benchmarks for future studies and practical applications. While the numerical values characterizing CVD processes provide essential guidelines for optimizing and understanding the deposition process, several limitations can affect their reliability and applicability. Deposition rates can vary significantly depending on the specific system and conditions. Factors such as reactor design, precursor delivery, and substrate material can cause deviations from expected rates. Operating at higher temperatures may not be feasible for all substrates, especially those sensitive to heat. Conversely, lower temperatures might not provide sufficient energy for effective precursor decomposition and film formation. Maintaining stable pressure conditions can be challenging, particularly in large-scale or industrial settings. Pressure fluctuations can impact film uniformity and quality. Variations in gas flow rates can lead to non-uniform deposition across the substrate. Achieving precise control over flow rates is crucial but can be technically demanding. Uniform concentration distribution throughout the reactor is difficult to achieve. Gradients in reactant concentration can result in uneven film properties. The activation energy is highly dependent on the specific chemical reactions and precursors used. Variations in precursor purity, flow dynamics, and reactor environment can alter the effective activation energy. The diffusion coefficient is influenced by temperature, pressure, and the physical properties of the reactants. Accurate determination requires extensive experimental data, which might not always be available.
Looking ahead, future research directions should focus on addressing these challenges through interdisciplinary collaborations, advanced experimental techniques, and the continued development of computational methodologies. By leveraging emerging technologies such as machine learning, data assimilation, and in situ monitoring, researchers can enhance the predictive capabilities of CVD models and further accelerate innovation in materials science and engineering.
8. Future Directions
Taking into account future directions of activities, a review article is planned that will provide a comprehensive overview of the current state and future potential of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) modeling. It will include recent advancements in CVD modeling techniques, focusing on advanced computational methods that improve simulation precision and efficiency, the integration of detailed surface chemistry for better prediction accuracy, recent developments in real-time monitoring and control strategies, and high-throughput computational methods for process optimization. The practical applications of advanced CVD modeling will be demonstrated across various fields, including semiconductor device fabrication, thin-film coatings for energy applications, advanced materials synthesis, and emerging nanotechnology applications. The paper will also address current challenges and limitations in CVD modeling, such as complex reaction mechanisms, high computational costs, lack of experimental validation, and the need for realistic boundary conditions. Finally, it will outline future directions and opportunities, highlighting the integration of computational models with experimental techniques, the development of predictive models, advancements in multiscale modeling, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize CVD processes and accelerate material discovery.