Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Evaluating and Advancing Global Energy Performance through the World Energy Trilemma Index (WETI)
3. Climate Change and Energy Security
Category | Insights | Reference |
---|---|---|
Energy Security | Security of external energy supply in the EU. | [4] |
Energy management challenges and benefits of cross-border renewable investment. | [18] | |
Addressing climate change adaptation to ensure energy security. | [5] | |
Emphasis on hydrogen as a green fuel. | [6] | |
Sustainable hydrogen production. | [7] | |
Hydrogen production by immobilized cyanobacterium. | [8] | |
Development of biohydrogen production processes. | [9] | |
Energy Equity | Effects of demographic changes on energy and emissions. | [19] |
Relationship between economic growth, renewable electricity, and CO2 emissions. | [20] | |
Nexus between energy intensity, carbon emissions, RE, and economic growth. | [21] | |
Ethical considerations between economic growth and environmental sustainability. | [22] | |
Enhancing climate change literacy in undergraduate programs. | [16] | |
Use of active learning in geoscience courses. | [17] | |
Environmental Sustainability | GHG emissions from biogas production. | [12] |
Energy savings and GHG reductions from biogas. | [13] | |
Carbon footprints across countries. | [14] | |
Overview and validation of the environmental Kuznets curve. | [23] | |
Application of EKC in emerging markets with advanced analytics. | [24] | |
A comprehensive survey on the EKC hypothesis. | [25] | |
Diversification of the energy mix in EU countries. | [26] | |
Role of technology in climate and energy politics. | [27] | |
The significance of end-use tech in energy and climate change. | [28] | |
Role of energy technology innovation in Canada. | [29] | |
Integrating RESs with TES systems. | [30] | |
Contribution of renewable electricity to mitigating CO2 emissions. | [20] | |
RE and environmental sustainability in Europe. | [31] | |
Role of RE in environmental sustainability in BRICS countries. | [32] | |
Promises and limitations of nuclear fission energy. | [33] | |
Relationship between nuclear energy, RE, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in the US. | [34] |
4. Energy Policies across Countries and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Environmental Sustainability
5. Investigating Challenges in Aligning Energy Security with Climate Change Mitigation
Country/Region | Energy Security Challenges | Climate Change Challenges | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Africa | Dominance of large hydropower | Inconsistency in defining “renewable” vs. “sustainable” | [66] |
ASEAN region, Indonesia | Balancing energy security and climate change issues, implementation of regional plans | Consideration of CO2 mitigation in generation planning, emphasis on renewable energy | [35] |
Asia | Affordability and process technologies, dependence on fossil fuels, infrastructure, and investment for sustainable energy | Balancing energy demand with economic growth, strengthening policies for renewables | [54] |
Developing countries | Increasing energy intensity due to urbanization, challenges in the power generation sector | Population and economic growth driving GHG emissions, environmental impacts of renewable technologies | [63] |
EU | Balancing energy independence with emission reduction, implementing market-based instruments for EE | Issues with biomass and biofuel use, the potential overlap of certificates, and emission reduction units | [37] |
|
| [40] | |
Europe (developed countries), Latin America, Africa (developing countries), Chile | Balancing security of supply with sustainability | Different emphasis on mitigation based on development status, opposition to coal and hydro projects in Chile | [38] |
GCC | Hydrocarbon sector dominance, weak diversification achievements, problems with energy price reforms | High ecological footprint, low air quality, need for new technologies and energy–environmental policy improvements | [42] |
|
| [43] | |
Global | Fossil fuel scarcity, energy security for import-reliant countries, need for government intervention and innovation, technological advancements relying on non-RES, and the impact of nuclear energy consumption | Environmental degradation, varying levels of environmental sustainability, fossil emissions driving green energy innovations, potential environmental degradation from natural resource usage | [36,40,44] |
Global (with a focus on the EU) | Uneven distribution of biomass resource needs for harmonized policies and standards, the establishment of trade frameworks for bioenergy | Sustainable production and consumption of bioenergy | [61] |
Global (with mention of South Korea) | Limited availability of natural resources, reliance on specific energy sources | Balancing stable energy supply with economic and environmental concerns, managing high GHG emissions in power generation | [65] |
Global (with mention of the EU) | Need for coherent governance systems, requirement of country-specific energy transition policies | Designing clear political objectives for emissions reduction, reorientation of fuel subsidies towards new technologies | [41] |
MENA | Dependence on hydrocarbons, need for renewable energy and innovation, political stability | Carbon emissions, underdeveloped research in carbon neutrality, economic growth impacting climate mitigation | [46] |
Evaluation of energy security through the Environmental Energy Security Index, diversified energy mix | Implementation of renewable energy initiatives for carbon neutrality, environmental Kuznets curve in high-income countries | [47] | |
South Asian region | Energy shortages, lack of access to clean energy, reliance on imported energy | Air pollution, climate vulnerability, natural resource degradation | [50] |
| |||
China, United Kingdom, Kenya, Bangladesh | Underutilization of renewables in China, optimizing resources in the UK, increasing efficiency in Kenya | Ecological concerns and alternative energy sources in Bangladesh | [52] |
Ghana (developing countries’ context) | Fast-growing energy demands with financial constraints, reliance on fossil fuels, hydropower, and traditional biomass | Rapid growth in energy demand affects decarbonization costs | [51] |
India | Challenges specific to hydropower development | [56] | |
Kuwait | Implementation of high-energy performance designs for residential buildings | Addressing the impact of subsidization on energy performance | [43] |
Saudi Arabia | Development of large-scale photovoltaic power plants to meet energy demands | Implementing energy policies that consider the relationship between electricity consumption and CO2 emissions | [43] |
UAE | The transition towards RE while maintaining current energy needs | Carbon emissions reduction and achieving a 50% increase in clean energy supply by 2050 | [43] |
Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain | Increasing energy demand and cost of intermittency with renewable energy | Urbanization linked to environmental degradation | [59] |
6. Examining Specific Case Studies: Energy Policies and Environmental Sustainability
Country/Region | Policy/Action | Description/Methodology | Measurable Outcomes | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
ASEAN, India, China, South Korea, Japan | Promotion of clean and renewable energy | Analysis of investments and policies for clean and renewable energy | Carbon emission reduction, diversification of energy supplies, enhancement of EE | [54] |
Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, Pakistan, South Korea) | Nuclear energy consumption, technological advancements, RESs | Impact of nuclear energy consumption, tech advancements, and renewable and non-RESs on carbon footprints | Improved environmental quality through nuclear and renewable energy; recommended investment in nuclear energy and tech innovation; encouraged regulatory tactics and energy modernization; support for environmentally friendly technologies and policies | [36] |
Baltic states | Flexible Kyoto Mechanism, financial support for EE and renewables | Assessment of policies on EU sustainable energy development targets using various indicators | End-use EE, use of renewables, combined heat and power use, security of energy supply, reduction in greenhouse gases and other pollutant emissions | [37] |
GCC | Environmental and energy policies | Explored policies implemented to protect the environment and empower sustainable consumption and production | Found that current policies are not enough to generate sustainable consumption and production; recommended enhancing movements toward the free market economy and renewable energy | [42] |
Feed-in tariffs (FIT) and energy auctions | Planning, grant and subsidy allocation, collaboration between public and private sectors | Encourages renewable energy use and reduces electricity consumption and CO2 emissions. | [43] | |
MENA | Renewable energy deployment | Analyzed economic, financial, and political variables, including innovation, for renewable energy deployment using the PSTR model | Identification of governance, innovation, political stability, and financial development as main drivers | [46] |
Environmental Energy Security Index (EESI) | Developed EESI with nine sub-indicators to quantify energy security considering social and environmental aspects | Yemen, Morocco, and Algeria ranked high on EESI, suggesting recommendations for energy mix diversification and energy-efficient technologies | [47] | |
Carbon neutrality research | Implemented heterogeneous and second-generation panel data techniques to investigate the roles of renewable energy, economic growth, and government effectiveness | Found that government effectiveness and renewable energy contribute to carbon neutrality; economic growth initially delays it | [48] | |
| ||||
Austria, Germany, Croatia | Decarbonization and diversification of energy systems | Use of RES | Reduction in carbon emissions from energy generation | [40] |
China | Top-1000 Enterprises Energy-Saving Program; National Emissions Monitoring Program for Key Polluting Sources | Targets energy intensity and imposes quantitative targets on SO2 emissions | Limited effects on energy and pollution outcomes for the energy intensity policy; significant reductions in SO2 emissions and cuts in direct coal use for the SO2 emissions policy | [55] |
Germany, Britain | Carbon pricing, renewable subsidies | Effectiveness of carbon pricing and renewable subsidies in reducing carbon emissions | Reduction in carbon emissions due to higher carbon prices in Britain; emissions abatement through wind and solar power in both countries | [53] |
Ghana | National Electrification Scheme | Reducing energy poverty and increasing electrification rates | Achieved 84% electrification in 2017 | [51] |
Greece (Thessaloniki) | Promotion of renewable energy | Evaluation of websites of renewable energy enterprises using the PROMETHEE II method | Not explicitly mentioned in the provided snippet | [67] |
Hawaii Island | Sustainable Energy Plan | Reduction in demand for primary energy through efficiency measures, renewable generation, and reduced use of fossil fuels | Reduction in GHG emissions; 46% of energy demand met by renewable generation; Hawaii Island released 1.96 Mt CO2-eq of GHG in 2006 | [73] |
Indonesia (Sulawesi) | Long-term generation expansion planning | Considering CO2 emission limitations and the target for a 31% renewable energy mix in 2050 | Increase in renewable energy mix to 32.39% by 2050; reduction in CO2 emissions to 27.04 million tons; 29% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030; reduction in CO2 emission production by 36.1% by 2030 and 38.4% by 2050 | [35] |
Italy (Foggia) | Reduction in GHG emissions | Urban Carbon Footprint (UCF) methodology to calculate spatial UCF | Identification of economic sectors with high GHG emissions suggested actions for emission reduction | [68] |
Italy (University of Turin) | UniTo energy plan through UniToGO | Reduce primary energy consumption, improve building EE, and increase energy from renewables | Reduced primary energy consumption; increased renewable energy usage; improved ranking in GreenMetric World University Rankings | [69] |
Kenya, China, Bangladesh, UK | Various energy policies promoting renewables | Development of solar power plants, wind farms, geothermal sources, hydroelectric, wind, solar heating, and geothermal energy | Reduction in pollution; reduced reliance on fossil fuels; renewable electricity overtaking fossil fuels in the UK | [52] |
Saudi Arabia | The techno-economic potential of the solar industry | Focused on the development and sustainability of the solar industry | Growth in solar energy production and potential for future energy security | [43] |
UAE | Pearl Rating System | Implementation of energy and environmental sustainability ratings for building designs | Integration of green energy technology in about 70% of buildings | [43] |
Energy Demand Side Management (DSM) and energy efficiency | Implementation of energy performance standards, district cooling networks | Reduction in peak electricity demand and overall energy demand | [43] | |
2050 Energy Plan | Aims for a reduction in electricity consumption and an increase in clean energy supply | Reduction of 14% in peak demand by 2021, 40% in electricity consumption by 2050, and 30% in Dubai by 2030 | [43] | |
Retrofit Program | Energy savings and carbon emissions’ reduction through building design changes | Savings of 7550 GWh/year in electricity consumption, reduction of 4.5 million tons/year in carbon emissions | [43] | |
United States | Public renewable energy research and development (RERDD) budgets | Investigation of the impact of RERDD budgets and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on CO2 emissions | Reduction in CO2 emissions, asymmetric effects of EPU on environmental policies | [72] |
RPS | Effectiveness of RPS in promoting renewable energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions | Increased renewable energy capacity and generation; reduced emissions; job creation; health co-benefits of renewable energy policy | [49] |
7. Renewables at the Forefront: Shaping a Secure and Sustainable Energy Future
Region/Country | Renewable Energy Technology | Impact on Energy Security | Impact on Environmental Sustainability | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Africa | Hydropower, wind, solar, biomass, geothermal | Mitigates energy insecurity due to diversified energy sources. | Mixed: Hydropower may have negative impacts on ecosystems, while others, like solar and wind, are highly sustainable. | [66] |
ASEAN | General renewables (focus on Asian countries’ efforts) | Emphasizes the role of science, technology, and collaborations in meeting energy demands. | Highlights transitioning to renewables to combat climate change, but specific impacts are not detailed. | [54] |
Baltic States (Specifically Latvia) | Renewable electricity, hydro (Latvia), wind farms (Latvia), biomass | Improved energy generation from renewables due to policy measures. | Aids in reducing environmental impact and mitigating climate change. Policy schemes also have positive results. | [37] |
BIMSTEC | General renewables | Transitioning from fossils to renewables is highlighted for energy security. Technological innovation plays a role. | Reduction in carbon footprint and environmental impacts. References the potential for 100% renewable electricity. | [80] |
European Union | Hydropower, wind (onshore and offshore), solar | Helps enhance energy security by reducing dependence on non-renewables and through energy storage solutions | Significant reduction in emissions and improved results for climate change. | [81] |
Bioenergy, biomass | The growth of the bioenergy trade is aimed at diversifying fuel sources for increased domestic energy supplies. | Emphasizes the need for EU-level standards and certification to ensure bioenergy sustainability. Potential negative impacts must be addressed. | [61] | |
RESs | Safeguards energy security and promotes energy independence. Significant in achieving energy supply safety as highlighted in EU energy policy. | Strengthens environmental protection and addresses climate change. Decarbonization of electricity generation through RESs contributes to natural environment preservation. | [67] | |
GCC | Solar and nuclear energy | Contributes to a stable energy supply and mitigates the impact of oil market volatility. | Helps to achieve the SDGs and reduces the carbon footprint of the energy sector. | [79] |
General renewable energy | Strengthens energy independence, reduces reliance on energy imports. | Reduces GHG emissions, mitigates climate change. | [58] | |
RES, support mechanisms (e.g., feed-in tariffs, auctions) |
| Promotes diverse RESs for environmental sustainability and long-term economic benefits. | [43] | |
MENA | Solar, wind, biomass | Enhances energy diversity and reduces reliance on fossil fuels, improving energy independence. | Significant potential to reduce carbon emissions and combat climate change. | [48] |
South Asian region | Various renewable energy technologies | Enhanced energy security through effective utilization of RESs. Increased cross-border renewable energy investment and trade contribute to regional energy security. | Mitigation of climate change through the adoption of RES. Emphasis on incorporating renewables to address environmental challenges. | [50] |
| ||||
Canada | Bioenergy feedstock | Emphasizes the need for accurate estimates of potential feedstock production for sound bioenergy policies, but does not delve deeply into energy security. | Bioenergy can lead to a net reduction in greenhouse gas production in the long term, contributing to environmental sustainability. | [82] |
Chile | Large hydro projects | Contributes to achieving a low carbon economy. | Renewable energy, including hydro projects, plays a role in achieving environmental sustainability. | [38] |
Germany, United Kingdom | Wind, solar power | Inferred to promote energy independence and diversification. | Contributes to the reduction in GHG emissions, mitigates climate change effects. | [53] |
Ghana | Solar, wind, biomass, hydro | Enhances energy security by diversifying energy sources and reducing dependence on fossil fuels | Mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and contributes to environmental sustainability. | [51] |
Hawaii Island | Not specified | Reduction in fossil fuel use and increased fuel diversity enhance energy security. | Achieving environmental sustainability by reducing demand for primary energy and shifting to renewable supplies. | [73] |
India | Small hydropower, wind energy, solar photovoltaic energy, garbage for power generation | Advocates for focusing on renewable/non-conventional energy resources instead of new thermal power stations. | Essential for reducing CO2 emissions and promoting afforestation. | [76] |
Italy | Electricity from biogas | Reducing dependence on fossil fuels if managed sustainably. | Contributing to reducing GHG emissions requires careful management of environmental issues like energy crop production, methane losses, and feedstock transport for long-term sustainability. | [83] |
Kenya, China, Bangladesh, United Kingdom | Solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal | Reduction in dependence on fossil fuels, improved energy security | Reduction in pollution, mitigation of climate change impacts | [63] |
Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain | General renewable energy | Supports environmental sustainability targets | Reduction in CO2 emissions | [52] |
Saudi Arabia | Solar energy | Contributes to the techno-economic potential of the renewable energy sector | Aids in sustainable energy production aligned with Saudi Vision 2030 | [43] |
South Korea | Hydropower | Renewable energy enhances supply stability and economy, especially considering fuel prices and fluctuations. | Its high contribution is due to low greenhouse gas emissions and its nature as a pure domestic energy source. | [65] |
Sulawesi, Indonesia | Variable renewable energy (VRE) power plants | Considered for long-term generation expansion planning. | Reduced CO2 emissions, albeit with increased costs. | [59] |
UAE | Solar and clean energy projects | Provides a robust alternative to oil, ensuring long-term energy security | Aids in meeting national and international environmental commitments and reducing GHG emissions. | [46] |
Pearl Rating System for Building Designs, 2050 Energy Plan, various renewable energy technologies | Increases energy efficiency and rationalization, reducing costs; aims for a 50% increase in clean energy supply. | Integration of green energy technology in buildings and support for sustainable building sector trends. | [43] | |
United States | Renewable energy technologies (focus on research and development) | Does not explicitly mention the impact on energy security. | Investing in renewable energy technologies can reduce CO2 emissions, highlighting the role of research and development. | [72] |
| ||||
General (global context) | RESs | RE significantly contributes to ensuring energy security. RE is projected to provide 90% of all electricity in the world by 2050. | RE has a substantial impact on decarbonization and climate policies. It addresses extreme weather conditions, rising sea levels, and biodiversity losses. | [40] |
General (global context) | Wind, solar, hydrogen | Diversification of economies, protection from price swings, job creation. | Achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. | [35] |
General (global context) | Hydroelectric power, solar, wind | Diversifies the energy mix, reducing reliance on a single primary source and ensuring long-term supply. | Significantly contributes to reducing CO2 emissions and mitigates climate change and air pollution. | [41] |
General (global context) | Biohydrogen from microalgae | Reducing dependency on fossil fuels, thereby contributing to energy security. Biohydrogen has high energy potential and sustainability. | Sustainable and clean; helps mitigate environmental issues associated with conventional energy sources. Carbon neutrality and water production as a significant by-product denote environmental stewardship. | [74] |
General (global context) | General renewables | Crucial for achieving energy security by decoupling from fossil fuel energy sources and promoting economic growth. | Supports achieving a decarbonized economy and minimizing adverse environmental impacts, particularly emissions. | [39] |
General (global context) | Green energy innovation (including adoption of renewables and new technologies) | Contributes to the diversification of energy sources and decarbonization of economic productivity. | Effective in reducing GHG emissions across various sectors like power, transport, and buildings. Promotes clean and sustainable energy sources. | [44] |
General (global context) | Renewable energy research development and demonstration (RERDD) | Emphasizes reducing reliance on traditional energy sources to improve energy security. | While investment in RERDD promotes clean energy innovation, current budgets are insufficient for significant CO2 emission reductions. | [77] |
General (global context) | Generic (not specified) | Not explicitly mentioned. | A sustainable economic model based on renewables could limit the environmental impacts of energy production. | [84] |
General (global context) | Bioenergy (liquid fuel) | Reduces dependence on petroleum. | Ethanol may have a minor environmental impact compared to gasoline, and perennial bioenergy crops can contribute positively. | [75] |
General (global context) | General renewable energy (mention of photovoltaic panels and wind farms) | Importance in transforming the energy system. | Reduction in pollutant emissions, but potential impacts on ecosystems must be addressed. | [55] |
General (global context) | Microalgae biofuels | Reduces reliance on fossil fuels, provides sustainable energy resource. | Mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and treats wastewater efficiently. | [78] |
8. Influence of Geopolitical Dynamics on Energy Security and Climate Change Mitigation
9. Trade-Offs between Achieving Energy Security and Mitigating Climate Change: Economic and Social Considerations
10. Effectiveness of Policy Instruments in Achieving Energy Security and Climate Change Mitigation
11. Conclusions and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
List of Abbreviations
ASEAN | Association of Southeast Asian Nations |
BIMSTEC | Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation |
CDM | Clean Development Mechanism |
CHP | Combined heat and power |
EGDIP | European Green Deal Investment Plan |
EE | Energy efficiency |
EFP | Ecological footprint |
EKC | Environmental Kuznets curve |
EPU | Economic policy uncertainty |
ESESI | Energy Security and Environmental Sustainability Index |
ETS | Emissions trading system |
EU | European Union |
GCC | Gulf Cooperation Council |
GHG | Greenhouse gases |
IEA | International Energy Agency |
LAC | Latin America and the Caribbean |
MWh | Megawatt-hour |
OECD | Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development |
PROMETHEE | Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations |
R&D | Research and development |
RDDD | Research, development, demonstration, and deployment |
RECs | Renewable energy certificates, or renewable energy credits |
RERDD | Renewable energy research, development, and demonstration |
RES | Renewable energy source |
RPS | Renewable Portfolio Standards |
SEIP | Sustainable Europe Investment Plan |
SDG | Sustainable development goal |
TES | Thermal energy storage |
UCF | Urban carbon footprint |
VRE | Variable renewable energy |
WEC | World Energy Council |
WETI | World Energy Trilemma Index |
References
- (WECouncil), W.E.C. WORLD ENERGY TRILEMMA INDEX 2022. World Energy Council, in partnership with OLIVER WYMAN. London, UK. Available online: https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/World_Energy_Trilemma_Index_2022.pdf?v=1669842216 (accessed on 1 November 2023).
- Song, M.; Latif, M.I.; Zhang, J.; Omran, M. Examining the energy trilemma index and the prospects for clean energy development. Gondwana Res. 2023, 122, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- (WECouncil), W.E.C. WORLD ENERGY TRILEMMA INDEX 2021. World Energy Council, in partnership with OLIVER WYMAN. London, UK. Available online: https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/WE_Trilemma_Index_2021.pdf?v=1634811254 (accessed on 1 November 2023).
- Le Coq, C.; Paltseva, E. Measuring the security of external energy supply in the European Union. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4474–4481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A.U.; Appadurai, A.N.; Neelormi, S. Status of Climate Change Adaptation in South Asia Region. In Status of Climate Change Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific; Springer Climate; Alam, M., Lee, J., Sawhney, P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Wu, J.; Huang, R.; Zhang, W.; He, W.; Deng, Z.; Han, Y.; Xiao, B.; Luo, H.; Qu, W. Effects of temperature and total solid content on biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of rice straw: Performance and microbial community characteristics. Chemosphere 2022, 286 Pt 1, 131655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anto, S.; Mukherjee, S.S.; Muthappa, R.; Mathimani, T.; Deviram, G.; Kumar, S.S.; Verma, T.N.; Pugazhendhi, A. Algae as green energy reserve: Technological outlook on biofuel production. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anjana, K.; Kaushik, A. Enhanced hydrogen production by immobilized cyanobacterium Lyngbya perelegans under varying anaerobic conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 63, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azwar, M.Y.; Hussain, M.A.; Abdul-Wahab, A.K. Development of biohydrogen production by photobiological, fermentation and electrochemical processes: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuso Nerini, F.; Tomei, J.; To, L.S.; Bisaga, I.; Parikh, P.; Black, M.; Borrion, A.; Spataru, C.; Castán Broto, V.; Anandarajah, G.; et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 2017, 3, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN. The 17 Goals. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals#:~:text=They%20recognize%20that%20ending%20poverty,preserve%20our%20oceans%20and%20forests. (accessed on 13 November 2023).
- Meyer-Aurich, A.; Schattauer, A.; Hellebrand, H.J.; Klauss, H.; Plöchl, M.; Berg, W. Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources. Renew. Energy 2012, 37, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bachmaier, J.; Effenberger, M.; Gronauer, A. Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 10, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanemoto, K.; Moran, D.; Hertwich, E.G. Mapping the Carbon Footprint of Nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10512–10517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unesco. How Can Education Strengthen Climate Action? 2023. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/how-can-education-strengthen-climate-action (accessed on 13 November 2023).
- Hanrahan, J.; Shafer, J. Improving Climate Change Literacy and Promoting Outreach in an Undergraduate Atmospheric Sciences Program. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2019, 100, 1209–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huguet, C.; Pearse, J.; Noè, L.F.; Valencia, D.M.; Ruiz, N.C.; Heredia, A.J.; Avedaño, M.A.P. Improving the motivation of students in a large introductory geoscience course through active learning. J. Geosci. Educ. 2019, 68, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, S.Z.; Kousar, A.; Razzaq, S.; Saeed, A.; Alam, M.; Mahmood, A. Energy management in South Asia. Energy Strategy Rev. 2018, 21, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronenberg, T. The impact of demographic change on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2637–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Shahbaz, M.; Roubaud, D.; Farhani, S. How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 2018, 113, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emir, F.; Bekun, F.V. Energy intensity, carbon emissions, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: New insights from Romania. Energy Environ. 2018, 30, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonakakis, N.; Chatziantoniou, I.; Filis, G. Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: An ethical dilemma. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 808–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, T.S. Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: An application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinda, S. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 49, 431–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekun, F.V.; Alola, A.A.; Sarkodie, S.A. Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO(2) emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, T. Editorial—Performance Philosophy Vol 3(1). Perform. Philos. 2017, 3, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, C.; Grubler, A.; Gallagher, K.S.; Nemet, G.F. Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordaan, S.M.; Romo-Rabago, E.; McLeary, R.; Reidy, L.; Nazari, J.; Herremans, I.M. The role of energy technology innovation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Canada. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 1397–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkhatat, A.; Al-Muhtaseb, S.A. Combined “Renewable Energy–Thermal Energy Storage (RE–TES)” Systems: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alola, A.A.; Yalciner, K.; Alola, U.V.; Akadiri, S.S. The role of renewable energy, immigration and real income in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Europe largest states. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 674, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nathaniel, S.P.; Yalçiner, K.; Bekun, F.V. Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resour. Policy 2021, 70, 101924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knapp, V.; Pevec, D. Promises and limitations of nuclear fission energy in combating climate change. Energy Policy 2018, 120, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menyah, K.; Wolde-Rufael, Y. CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 2911–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthahhari, A.A.; Putranto, L.M.; Sarjiya; Tumiran; Anugerah, F.S.; Priyanto, A.; Isnandar, S.; Savitri, I. Environmental Considerations in Long-Term Generation Expansion Planning with Emission Limitations: An Analysis of the Sulawesi Power System in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2020 FORTEI-International Conference on Electrical Engineering (FORTEI-ICEE), Bandung, Indonesia, 23–24 September 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, N.; Mahboob, F.; Hamid, Z.; Sheikh, A.A.; Ali, M.S.E.; Glabiszewski, W.; Wysokinska-Senkus, A.; Senkus, P.; Cyfert, S. Nexus between Nuclear Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Asia Pacific Region: Policy toward Environmental Sustainability. Energies 2022, 15, 6956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streimikiene, D.; Sivickas, G. The EU sustainable energy policy indicators framework. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mocarquer, S.; Rudnick, H. Achieving a low carbon economy in a fast developing country. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 24–28 July 2011; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Alola, A.A.; Bekun, F.V.; Sarkodie, S.A. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rabbi, M.F.; Popp, J.; Mate, D.; Kovacs, S. Energy Security and Energy Transition to Achieve Carbon Neutrality. Energies 2022, 15, 8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arroyo M, F.R.; Miguel, L.J. Low-Carbon Energy Governance: Scenarios to Accelerate the Change in the Energy Matrix in Ecuador. Energies 2020, 13, 4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweidan, O.D. The environmental and energy policies to enable sustainable consumption and production in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 23, 2639–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almasri, R.A.; Narayan, S. A recent review of energy efficiency and renewable energy in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Int. J. Green Energy 2021, 18, 1441–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkodie, S.A.; Owusu, P.A. Escalation effect of fossil-based CO(2) emissions improves green energy innovation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 785, 147257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldulaimi, S.H.; Abdeldayem, M.M. Examining the impact of renewable energy technologies on sustainability development in the middle east and north Africa region. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2022, 14, 18479790221110835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awijen, H.; Belaïd, F.; Zaied, Y.B.; Hussain, N.; Lahouel, B.B. Renewable energy deployment in the MENA region: Does innovation matter? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 179, 121633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chentouf, M.; Allouch, M. Environmental energy security in the MENA region—An aggregated composite index. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 10945–10974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, C.; Zhang, J.; Ntarmah, A.H.; Kong, Y.; Zhao, H. Carbon Neutrality in the Middle East and North Africa: The Roles of Renewable Energy, Economic Growth, and Government Effectiveness. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rhodes, E.; Scott, W.A.; Jaccard, M. Designing flexible regulations to mitigate climate change: A cross-country comparative policy analysis. Energy Policy 2021, 156, 112419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.A.A.; Zhou, P.; Walasai, G.D.; Mohsin, M. Energy security and environmental sustainability index of South Asian countries: A composite index approach. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diawuo, F.A.; Scott, I.J.; Baptista, P.C.; Silva, C.A. Assessing the costs of contributing to climate change targets in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Ghanaian electricity system. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020, 57, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Tanzil, S.; Ritu, R.H.; Kamunya, D.M. Geographical distribution of renewable energy production for maximum efficiency and environmental sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Modern Power Systems (MPS), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 16–17 June 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Gugler, K.; Haxhimusa, A.; Liebensteiner, M. Effectiveness of climate policies: Carbon pricing vs. subsidizing renewables. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2021, 106, 102405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thavasi, V.; Ramakrishna, S. Asia energy mixes from socio-economic and environmental perspectives. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4240–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, M.; Weng, Y.; Cao, J.; Selin, N.E.; Karplus, V.J. Improving Evaluation of Energy Policies with Multiple Goals: Comparing Ex Ante and Ex Post Approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 15584–15593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandya, A.B. Comprehensive Approach for Hydropower Development for Energy-Water Security. In Water Governance and Management in India; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 63–98. [Google Scholar]
- Chapman, A.; Shigetomi, Y. Visualizing the shape of society: An analysis of public bads and burden allocation due to household consumption using an input-output approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, K.; Rahman, S.M.; Khondaker, A.N.; Abubakar, I.R.; Aina, Y.A.; Hasan, M.A. Renewable energy utilization to promote sustainability in GCC countries: Policies, drivers, and barriers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 20798–20814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Leitao, N.C.; Bekun, F.V. Fresh Validation of the Low Carbon Development Hypothesis under the EKC Scheme in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain. Energies 2021, 14, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. Africa Energy Outlook 2022: Challenges and Priorities-Africa in an Evolving Global Context. 2020. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2022/key-findings (accessed on 1 November 2023).
- Magar, S.B.; Pelkonen, P.; Tahvanainen, L.; Toivonen, R.; Toppinen, A. Growing trade of bioenergy in the EU: Public acceptability, policy harmonization, European standards and certification needs. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 3318–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Shahzad, U.; Paramati, S.R. Impact of energy infrastructure investments on renewable electricity generation in major Asian developing economies. Aust. Econ. Pap. 2022, 62, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Princiotta, F.T.; Loughlin, D.H. Global climate change: The quantifiable sustainability challenge. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2014, 64, 979–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shukla, A.K.; Sudhakar, K.; Baredar, P. Renewable energy resources in South Asian countries: Challenges, policy and recommendations. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2017, 3, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, W.S.; Kim, S.S.; Moon, K.H.; Lim, C.Y.; Yun, S.W. A conceptual framework for energy security evaluation of power sources in South Korea. Energy 2017, 137, 1066–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyiwul, L. Income, environmental considerations, and sustainable energy consumption in Africa. Int. J. Green Energy 2018, 15, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreopoulou, Z.; Koliouska, C.; Galariotis, E.; Zopounidis, C. Renewable energy sources: Using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 131, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, M.; Laiola, E.; Tricase, C.; Rana, R. Toward urban environmental sustainability: The carbon footprint of Foggia’s municipality. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitri Sari, R.; Baricco, M.; Tartaglino, A.; Gambino, P.; Dansero, E.; Cottafava, D.; Cavaglià, G.; Hadiyanto, H.; Suwartha, N. University of Turin performance in UI GreenMetric Energy and Climate Change. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 48, 03003. [Google Scholar]
- Cottafava, D.D. The Green Office Model in Italy: Enabling Student-Driven Change Towards Sustainability through the Green Office Model. 2017. Available online: http://www.green.unito.it/it/Talk_ISCN#:~:text=The%20contribution%20will%20be%20a,led%20and%20staff (accessed on 25 October 2023).
- MUV. MUV Interviews. The Unito Green Office Success Story 2021. Available online: https://www.muvgame.com/en/muv-interviews-the-unito-green-office-success-story/ (accessed on 25 October 2023).
- Ahmed, Z.; Cary, M.; Shahbaz, M.; Vo, X.V. Asymmetric nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable energy technology budgets, and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the United States. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 313, 127723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.; Chertow, M. Climate stabilization wedges in action: A systems approach to energy sustainability for Hawaii Island. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2234–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Li, F.; Zhu, X.; Liao, Q.; Chang, J.S.; Ho, S.H. Biohydrogen production from microalgae for environmental sustainability. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parish, E.S.; Kline, K.L.; Dale, V.H.; Efroymson, R.A.; McBride, A.C.; Johnson, T.L.; Hilliard, M.R.; Bielicki, J.M. Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production. Environ. Manag. 2013, 51, 307–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, N.; Taplin, R. Climate change, electricity generation and environmental sustainability: India and the Ganges Region. Energy Policy 1998, 26, 989–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, T.S.; Awosusi, A.A.; Bekun, F.V.; Altuntas, M. Coal energy consumption beat renewable energy consumption in South Africa: Developing policy framework for sustainable development. Renew. Energy 2021, 175, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho Lopes, A.P.; dos Santos, F.M.L.F.; Vilar, V.J.P.; Pires, J.C.M. Process Integration Applied to Microalgal Biofuels Production. In Energy from Microalgae; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 35–57. [Google Scholar]
- Albaker, A.; Abbasi, K.R.; Haddad, A.M.; Radulescu, M.; Manescu, C.; Bondac, G.T. Analyzing the Impact of Renewable Energy and Green Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the MENA Region. Energies 2023, 16, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanger, A.; Hossain, M.R.; Awan, A.; Sunday Adebayo, T.; Zubair Chishti, M. Linking tourist’s footprint and environmental tragedy through transportation, globalization and energy choice in BIMSTEC region: Directions for a sustainable solution using novel GMM-PVAR approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stranddorf, L.K.; Clavreul, J.; Prieur-Vernat, A.; Ryberg, M.W. Evaluation of life cycle impacts of European electricity generation in relation to the Planetary Boundaries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 39, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dymond, C.C.; Titus, B.D.; Stinson, G.; Kurz, W.A. Future quantities and spatial distribution of harvesting residue and dead wood from natural disturbances in Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacenetti, J.; Negri, M.; Fiala, M.; Gonzalez-Garcia, S. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: Impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho, J.F. Measuring economic performance, social progress and sustainability using an index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BIMSTEC. Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. Available online: https://bimstec.org/ (accessed on 25 October 2023).
- Adedoyin, F.F.; Zakari, A. Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: The role of economic policy uncertainty. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 140014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Bank. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. ©License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. 2023. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39796 (accessed on 29 November 2023).
- Zahoor, Z.; Khan, I.; Hou, F. Clean energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 16006–16016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Region/Country | Energy Policy/Strategy | Key Findings/Output | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
ASEAN region | Generation expansion planning | Emphasis on expanding energy generation capacities. | [35] |
Asia–Pacific top consumers | Nuclear energy consumption | The sustainability alignment of nuclear energy is ambiguous. | [36] |
Baltic states | Biomass and biofuels emphasis | Introduced a scoring system prioritizing biomass and biofuels. | [37] |
Developed vs. developing countries | Varied energy policies | Socio-economic contexts influence policy design. | [38] |
European Union (EU) | Trade policy and RE consumption | Policies influence environmental footprint (EFP). | [39] |
RE Policy | The policy has led to significant achievements in RE adoption. In 2020, the share of gross final energy consumption from RESs reached 22%, exceeding the 20% target set for 2020. | [40] | |
RE and EE | Leading the transition towards renewables and efficiency. | [41] | |
GCC Region | Environmental and energy policies for sustainable consumption and production | Institutional actions are not sufficient for sustainable consumption and production; there is a need for economic diversification and a shift toward RE. | [42] |
RE, EE improvements, technological advancements, policy reforms | There has been an increased use of RES, reduction in energy consumption and carbon emissions, and advancements in EE and technology, but overall RE contribution remains low compared to conventional sources. | [43] | |
IEA member countries | Green energy innovations and R&D | Energy R&D is pivotal in reducing emissions. | [44] |
MENA Region | RE technologies | Positive effect on sustainability development: high cultural acceptance and readiness to invest in clean energy. | [45] |
Factors driving RE deployment (economic, financial, political) | Innovation and governance quality are the main drivers; there are calls for sustainable policy options to increase innovation performance. | [46] | |
Environmental Energy Security Index (EESI) | There is variation in energy security levels and recommendations for investing in local resources, diversifying the energy mix, and energy-efficient technologies. | [47] | |
RE, energy intensity, green innovation | RE significantly reduces carbon emissions and emphasizes the need for green innovation and energy-efficient technologies. | [42] | |
RE investments, government effectiveness | Government effectiveness and RE contribute to carbon neutrality; economic growth initially delays it. | [48] | |
OECD countries | Flexible energy regulations | Policies’ effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and design features. | [49] |
South Asian countries | Energy Security and Environmental Sustainability Index (ESESI) | Scoring system categorizing nations on energy security and environmental sustainability. | [50] |
Various Nations | Energy Planning Models | Effective policy decision making has no direct tie to environmental sustainability. | [51] |
| |||
Austria | Energy transition strategies towards zero-carbon energy sources | Demonstrated reduced GHG emissions. | [40] |
Bangladesh | RE sourcing | Strategies tailored to national resources and contexts. | [52] |
Solar home systems | Provided electricity to over 5 million households, reducing kerosene usage and improving indoor air quality. | [40] | |
Brazil | Ethanol fuel policies | The policy has led to ethanol meeting 50% of light vehicle fuel needs, contributing to reduced urban air pollution and emissions. | [40] |
United Kingdom | Carbon pricing vs. renewable subsidies | Carbon pricing was found to be more effective. | [53] |
RE sourcing | Strategies tailored to national resources and contexts. | [52] | |
China | RE-focused policies | Emphasis on creating a low-carbon society. | [54] |
Top-1000 Enterprises Energy-Saving Program | Analysis of policies targeting SO2 emissions. | [55] | |
Hydropower integration | Utilized hydropower potential. | [56] | |
Croatia | Energy transition strategies | Demonstrated reduced GHG emissions. | [40] |
Germany | Sustainable energy transition strategies | Policies focus on social equity and implementation challenges. | [57] |
Energy transition strategies to increase energy access and affordability, as well as diversification towards renewable energy | Demonstrated reduced GHG emissions. | [40] | |
RE policies (feed-in tariffs, RPS) | Policies effective in promoting RE. | [58] | |
Carbon pricing vs. renewable subsidies | Carbon pricing is more effective. | [53] | |
Greece | RE within the EKC framework | Aligned with EU’s 2030 targets and European Green Deal Investment Plan. | [59] |
India | National solar mission | India’s solar power capacity grew from 2.6 GW in 2014 to over 40 GW by 2019, reducing coal dependence and emissions. | [40] |
RE-focused policies | Emphasis on creating a low-carbon society. | [54] | |
Italy | Sustainable energy transition strategies | Policies focus on social equity and implementation challenges. | [57] |
RE within the EKC framework | Aligned with EU’s 2030 targets and European Green Deal Investment Plan. | [59] | |
Japan | Sustainable energy transition strategies | Policies focus on social equity and implementation challenges. | [57] |
RE-focused policies | Emphasis on a low-carbon society. | [54] | |
Kenya | RE sourcing | Strategies tailored to national resources and contexts. | [52] |
Norway | Hydropower integration | Utilized hydropower potential. | [56] |
Portugal | RE within the EKC framework | Aligned with EU’s 2030 targets and European Green Deal Investment Plan. | [59] |
South Korea | RE-focused policies | Emphasis on creating a low-carbon society. | [54] |
Spain | RE within the EKC framework | Aligned with EU’s 2030 targets and European Green Deal Investment Plan. | [59] |
Sweden | Hydropower integration | Utilized hydropower potential. | [56] |
United States | RE policies (feed-in tariffs, RPS) | Policies effective in promoting RE. | [58] |
Renewable portfolio standards | The policy has boosted RE capacity and generation, leading to reduced emissions and health benefits. | [40] |
Country/Region | Geopolitical Dynamic Impact | Key Insights | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
BIMSTEC region | Interplay between tourism, globalization, and energy choices | Renewable energy boosts economic and environmental resilience | [80] |
Developing nations | International commitments vs. sustainable energy solutions | The challenge of poverty mitigation and consistent energy supply | [52] |
EU | Dependency on Russian energy imports, exacerbated by the Russia–Ukraine conflict | Geopolitical tensions are challenging the EU’s energy security, necessitating a shift to RE and energy diversification to achieve independence | [40] |
Ganges region, India | Emissions from coal-powered plants | The challenge of curtailing emissions and ensuring the energy supply | [76] |
GCC | Technology transfer and international agreements impact energy policies | RE sector’s growth is influenced by technology development, international transfers, and UN climate agreements | [43] |
General (global context) | Energy source diversification and import dependence | To enhance national security, reduce dependence on energy imports | [50] |
Shift to renewable energy | Reduces geopolitical risks associated with fossil fuel dependence | [67] | |
MENA | Economic, financial, and political variables influence renewable energy deployment | Political stability, governance quality, financial development, and innovation are significant drivers for renewable energy deployment. Higher innovation performance is likely to bolster the impact of governance quality on renewable energy deployment. | [46] |
| |||
Chile | Growing population’s energy demands and low-carbon economy transition | Balancing energy needs with a low-carbon transition | [38] |
China | Transitioning to energy security through economic and political strategies | China’s energy security transition involves economic and political measures, focusing on decarbonization and sustainable energy sources | [40] |
Japan | Household consumption patterns influence societal dynamics | Implications on energy utilization and environmental health | [57] |
Russia–Ukraine | Increase in energy prices due to conflict | Risks of relying heavily on geopolitically sensitive regions | [40] |
Energy Security vs. Climate Change | Economic Considerations | Social Considerations | Recommendations/Strategies | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Balancing energy security with environmental sustainability; emphasis on renewable energy and decarbonizing electricity. | Energy’s role in economic growth, stability, and poverty alleviation. EU’s policy goals for competitive prices and investment in R&D for transition. | Importance of energy for social development and social acceptance of renewable energy. | Comprehensive approach with economic, social, and environmental considerations. Development and utilization of RES. | [37,39,44,50,54,67,76,80,86] |
Transition from fossil fuels to cleaner technologies; sustainable energy systems to address security and climate change. | Impact of economic growth on ecological footprint. Affordability challenges. Promoting competitive markets for economic competitiveness. | Women’s participation in the labor market. Central Asian efforts in clean energy. Environmental impact of thermal plants. | Implement policies promoting sustainable practices. Introduce alternative energy systems and R&D for cleaner technologies. | [37,39,44,54,65,76,80,82,86] |
Structural adjustments in energy systems; energy security in economic policy uncertainty. | Investment in R&D and economic policy impact. Challenges of fast-growing demand and reliance on natural resource exports. | Public consultation for quality of life. Public acceptability of bioenergy and efforts to reduce energy poverty. | Technological innovation to decarbonize sectors. Policy interventions and monitoring for development with environmental impact consideration. | [37,38,44,51,54,61,65,68,72,76,80,82] |
Diversifying energy sources for security and climate neutrality; promoting renewables and low-carbon technologies. | Importance of energy affordability and rising cost challenges. Renewable technologies’ cost-effectiveness. Investment in nuclear energy and cleaner energy public–private partnerships. | It is not extensively discussed but includes health impacts, safety, and impact monitoring. | Increase renewable energy share, reduce energy use, and consider higher costs with emission limits. Wastewater treatment integration with microalgal cultivation. Policy instruments for effective energy codes. | [35,36,40,41,52,58,63,66,78] |
Enhancing water and energy security with hydropower in India; stabilization wedge methodology for sustainable transition. | Renewable technologies’ cost-effectiveness and economic performance. Techno-economic concerns; policy interventions needed. | Importance of safety and impact monitoring. Social, technological, and economic conditions for sustainable energy. | Accelerate hydropower development with environmental and social impact considerations. A holistic approach with efficiency measures and renewable generation. | [56,73,75] |
Balance and transition | Investment in local renewable resources, diversification of energy mix, technological innovations for energy savings, reduction in energy imports, shift towards low-carbon economies. | Employment shifts, public acceptance of new technologies, education, and awareness, managing transitions in fossil fuel-reliant regions, addressing energy poverty. | Encourage regional cooperation, policy reforms, sustainable energy policies, integrating renewable energy into national grids, EE standards, public and private sector partnerships, promoting green innovation. | [46,47,79] |
Policy Instrument | Key Findings and Impacts | Limitations and Challenges | Context/Comparison | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carbon pricing |
|
|
| [37,49,53] |
Renewable energy certificates |
|
|
| [37] |
Renewable energy subsidies |
|
|
| [53] |
Flexible regulations |
|
|
| [49] |
Energy price reforms |
|
|
| [42] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Elkhatat, A.; Al-Muhtaseb, S. Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability. Energies 2024, 17, 3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133179
Elkhatat A, Al-Muhtaseb S. Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability. Energies. 2024; 17(13):3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133179
Chicago/Turabian StyleElkhatat, Ahmed, and Shaheen Al-Muhtaseb. 2024. "Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability" Energies 17, no. 13: 3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133179
APA StyleElkhatat, A., & Al-Muhtaseb, S. (2024). Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability. Energies, 17(13), 3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133179