Next Article in Journal
Exploring Hydrogen Embrittlement: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Advances in Metal Science
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Flexibility Potential of Energy-Intensive Industries in Energy Markets
Previous Article in Journal
SMC Algorithms in T-Type Bidirectional Power Grid Converter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Energy Security Based on Level of Alignment with the Goals of Agenda 2030
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Closing the Loop between Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A Holistic Assessment Based on Multiple Criteria

by
Christos Mertzanakis
,
Christos Vlachokostas
*,
Charalampos Toufexis
and
Alexandra V. Michailidou
Sustainability Engineering Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), P.O. Box 483, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(12), 2971; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122971
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 14 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024

Abstract

This paper puts forward a generic methodological framework to holistically assess WtE technologies based on the PROMETHEE approach. In addition to environmental and economic aspects, the method focuses on large-scale applicability and social preference, thus adopting economic, environmental, social, and technological criteria. Three data sources are selected, namely the scientific literature, a public survey, and an experts’ opinion survey, which is a novel combination with the aim to cover public consensus, technological applicability, and to provide alternative data sources for the economic and environmental criteria, thus enriching the methodology with the input of location specific data. The demonstration of the applicability of the proposed methodology is realized at a national level for the case of Greece. Anaerobic Digestion is shown to be the most preferable choice, recognized for its cost-effectiveness and lower environmental burden to other WtE technologies (i.e., gasification, pyrolysis, incineration). When all criteria are evaluated with equal weights, anaerobic digestion greatly outperforms incineration (net flow 0.833 versus 0.1667), while incineration only becomes the most preferred choice if the social criterion is in high focus (i.e., over 63% weight).
Keywords: multi-criteria decision analysis; life cycle assessment; waste-to-energy; waste management; anaerobic digestion multi-criteria decision analysis; life cycle assessment; waste-to-energy; waste management; anaerobic digestion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mertzanakis, C.; Vlachokostas, C.; Toufexis, C.; Michailidou, A.V. Closing the Loop between Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A Holistic Assessment Based on Multiple Criteria. Energies 2024, 17, 2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122971

AMA Style

Mertzanakis C, Vlachokostas C, Toufexis C, Michailidou AV. Closing the Loop between Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A Holistic Assessment Based on Multiple Criteria. Energies. 2024; 17(12):2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122971

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mertzanakis, Christos, Christos Vlachokostas, Charalampos Toufexis, and Alexandra V. Michailidou. 2024. "Closing the Loop between Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A Holistic Assessment Based on Multiple Criteria" Energies 17, no. 12: 2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122971

APA Style

Mertzanakis, C., Vlachokostas, C., Toufexis, C., & Michailidou, A. V. (2024). Closing the Loop between Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A Holistic Assessment Based on Multiple Criteria. Energies, 17(12), 2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122971

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop