Next Article in Journal
Potential Business Models of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) for the Oil Refining Industry in Thailand
Next Article in Special Issue
Conducting a Geographical Information System-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis to Assess the Potential and Location for Offshore Wind Farms in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Probabilistic Evaluation of Geomechanical Risks in CO2 Storage: An Exploration of Caprock Integrity Metrics Using a Multilaminate Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilisation of Renewable Electricity to Produce Synthetic Methane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Towards Cleaner Cities: An Analysis of the Impact of Bus Fleet Decomposition on PM and NOX Emissions Reduction in Sustainable Public Transport

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
2
Department of Technical Systems Engineering, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 10, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
3
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Environment and Architecture, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
4
Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, al. mjr. W. Kopisto 2a, 35-315 Rzeszow, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(19), 6956; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196956
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 20 September 2023 / Accepted: 2 October 2023 / Published: 5 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Transition and Environmental Sustainability II)

Abstract

:
The problem of poor air quality in urban areas has a negative impact on the health of residents. This is especially important during periods of smog. In Poland, as in other countries, the problem of poor air quality, especially during the winter season, is associated with a high concentration of particulate pollutants in ambient air (PM10, PM2.5). Sources of particulate emissions, in addition to solid-fuel boilers, include means of transportation, especially those equipped with diesel engines. In turn, during periods of strong sunshine (spring and summer), the problem of photochemical smog, whose precursors are nitrogen oxides NOX, arises in urban areas. Their main sources of emissions are internal combustion engines. Therefore, to improve air quality in urban areas, changes are being made in the transport sector, among which is upgrading the fleet of urban transport vehicles to low- or zero-emission vehicles, which are more environmentally friendly. In addition, measures that reduce the harmfulness of the transportation sector to air quality include the introduction of clean transportation zones, as well as park-and-ride (P&R) systems. The purpose of this article is to present the results in terms of PM10, PM2.5, and NOx emission reductions, implemented over a period of two years (2021–2022) in the area of the Rzeszow agglomeration, related to the modernization of the suburban bus fleet and the implementation of a P&R system for passenger cars. The results of the study were compared with the value of estimated emissions from coal-fired boilers used for residential heating and hot water, which also contribute to smog. Thanks to the implementation of the project, i.e., the replacement of 52 old buses with new buses of the Euro VI emission class and the construction of new P&R spaces, the total average annual reduction in emissions amounted to approximately 703.6 kg of PM10, approximately 692.7 kg of PM2.5, and a reduction of approximately 10.4 tons of NOX.

1. Introduction

Poor air quality in Poland and other countries of the European Union is largely attributed to high concentrations of volatile dust, including monitored PM2.5 and PM10. In the year 2020, as much as 96% of the urban populace encountered levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exceeding the World Health Organization’s recommended threshold of 5 µg/m3 [1,2]. Dust emissions are particularly high in winter, when solid fuel boilers become the main source of emissions. Figure 1 graphically shows the average values of dust in the ambient air at the air quality monitoring station in Rzeszow [3]. As can be seen, the problem of high concentrations of particulate matter is related to the winter season. However, this does not mean that the problem is exclusive to the winter season. Sources of particulate emissions also include vehicles, especially vehicles with diesel engines [4,5], which, in addition to releasing dust from the abrasion of the tires, the road surface, clutch friction materials, or brakes, emit significant amounts of particulate matter in the engine exhaust [6,7]. In addition, internal combustion engines are a major source of NOX emissions in urban areas [2,7]. The dependencies of changes in air pollutant concentrations are proportional to traffic intensity [8]. The problem of engine exhaust emissions depends on many factors, including those related to road resistance and driving cycle [9,10]. It is important to introduce solutions in urban transportation to improve the energy efficiency of the transportation system. [11]. The issue of particulate emissions from vehicular sources is addressed by the proposed Euro 7 vehicle emission standard [12]. As predicted by previous projections [13], the Euro 7 standards are poised to become the pioneering global emissions regulations, surpassing the scope of merely controlling exhaust emissions. These standards will introduce further constraints on particulate emissions originating from brakes, along with guidelines for addressing microplastic emissions originating from tires. The rules will apply to all vehicles, including electric vehicles. The solutions being introduced to improve the operation of transport in urban areas in terms of environmental impact [14] are also related to reducing the emissions of other pollutants, including greenhouse gases [15], which is particularly important in view of the problem of global warming and observed climate change [16]. In addition, reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions are important due to their harmfulness to the environment and efforts to reduce the risk of photochemical smog [17].
At the same time, air pollution has become an important criterion affecting human health. It also has a significant impact on the health of the exposed population. It is becoming important to ensure clean air, which is increasingly affecting inequalities in health, both locally and globally. Unsatisfactory air quality involves significant social and economic deficits but can be avoided by coordinated action [18].
It should be noted that a person inhales, in relation to their level of activity, about 10–20 m3 of air per day of life, and with the air, various types of pollutants also enter the body. The body’s reaction to toxic factors can vary in nature [19]:
  • Strong, caused by a single introduction of a large dose of toxins into the body;
  • Chronic, caused by the long-term introduction of small doses of toxins into the body;
  • Imperceptible; the effects of introducing toxins into the body can manifest themselves only after a certain period of time.
When analyzing the individual effects of PM10 dust on human health, it should be noted that it directly affects the development and exacerbation of respiratory diseases associated with pulmonary and bronchial obstruction. Exposure to PM10 can cause inflammation in the lower respiratory tract, leading to symptoms analogous to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [18]. A study carried out in several European cities indicated that an increase in PM10 concentration leads to an increase in asthma incidence of 1.2% for the age group 0–14 years and 1.1% in the 15–64 age group. In the case of the incidence of COPD in people 65 years and older, it increases by 1.0% [20].
There is also no doubt that PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matters also have a carcinogenic effect [21,22]. Exposure to PM10 is associated with an increased risk of relative lung cancer development of 1.22 per 10 μg/m3 increase in its concentration in the air [23]. PM10 also has a negative impact on the circulatory system, but this impact is smaller than that of PM2.5 [24]. As research shows, an increase in PM10 concentration by 21 μg/m3 results in a risk of developing atherosclerosis increasing by approximately 4%, because PM10 dust always contains smaller particles (including PM2.5), according to WHO data. PM10 dust also has the ability to penetrate the bloodstream, and its increased concentration in the air can cause a higher number of deaths from cardiovascular causes [25,26].
Nitrogen oxides enter the human body through inhalation and are adsorbed through the tissue of the respiratory system into the circulatory system. In recent years, the negative health effects of short- and long-term exposure to elevated NO2 concentrations have been confirmed. The relevant studies clearly indicated a relationship between short-term exposure to NO2 and respiratory symptoms. The most common symptoms were pneumonia, worsening of symptoms in patients with asthma, and worsening of allergic reactions in the airways [27]. In the case of prolonged exposure to NO2 in children, there was a high probability of developing asthma [28].
In conclusion of the health aspect, it should be noted that scientific research shows that a reduction in particulate matter by 10 μg/m3 after 10 years results in a 27% reduction in the number of deaths from cardiovascular diseases [29]. Furthermore, it has been proven that reducing the average annual concentration of PM2.5 to 15 μg/m3 could extend useful life by 1 month to 2 years [30]. Therefore, reducing the emission of harmful dust is also important from the perspective of the health of the society living in a given area.
One of the EU initiatives includes a project executed in Rzeszow, titled “Development of a Low-Emission Economy and improvement of the mobility of residents by improving sustainable public transportation in the ROF.” This undertaking aims to replace the aging bus fleet with new buses that adhere to low-emission standards. The project encompasses the Rzeszow Functional Area and involves nine municipalities. The endeavor encompassed various components, such as the procurement of 54 novel low-emission passenger buses, and the revitalization of 233.3 km of public transportation routes (achieved by constructing new road connections and bridges, as well as refurbishing road infrastructure). It also involved the establishment of bus stops, bus bays, sidewalks, and bus shelters, along with the accompanying infrastructure. Furthermore, the initiative included the creation of 11 park-and-ride parking facilities, offering a total of 481 parking spaces, including 31 designated for individuals with disabilities. The renovation of bus and train stations, along with the establishment of an interchange center to facilitate seamless transfers, was also part of the plan. Additionally, the project encompassed the construction of bicycle paths spanning a total length of 12.45 km, accompanied by 13 “Bike & Ride” parking facilities. The scope also extended to the establishment of technical facilities like workshop buildings, bus washing facilities, and supporting infrastructure.
The purpose and novelty of this article is to present the benefits of reducing the emissions of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, associated with the replacement of the old-type city bus fleet with new low-emission buses of the EURO 6 emission class. Furthermore, the reduction in the emissions of the pollutants analyzed, associated with the construction of parking lots of the P&R system, was taken into account, because drivers leave their personal cars in places outside of Rzeszów and use public transport while traveling to work in Rzeszów. In addition, a comparison of vehicle emissions results with emissions from solid-fuel central heating and hot water boilers used in single-family homes is presented.
This research employed actual data for all bus traffic calculations, and emissions assessments were conducted using the COPERT Version 5.6.5 software suite. The study introduces a novel approach for assessing the repercussions of transitioning from an aging bus fleet to a modern counterpart, a method that can readily find application in analogous scenarios within other European urban contexts. An overview of the study’s framework is depicted in Figure 2.

2. Research Background

The use of modern propulsion systems in urban buses is crucial in the context of the implementation of European Union projects and policies, in particular, the European Green Deal [31]. The use of low-emission, renewable-based city buses is also crucial to achieving sustainable public transport goals [32]. A study of this type, which compared the use of, e.g., electric buses as a replacement for older generation propulsion, is described in the paper [33]. Buses of this type are an effective means of reducing emissions of, e.g., PM and NOx. The use of modern bus designs and propulsion systems also contributes to the reduction in noise in congested areas [34]. As an example of the issues described above, there is also a paper, [35], in which the authors describe different strategies for the development of urban transport with a view to its electrification in the city of Szczecin, Poland. In this paper, three hypotheses are tested which describe the introduction of zero-emission buses into urban transport for different scopes of implementation. Another article dealing with the decomposition of public transport in Poland over the years is [36], in which the authors describe the development of different public transport strategies in Poland over the years 1990–2020, highlighting socioeconomic, environmental, and technological aspects.
A key issue in the modernization of existing transport systems in modern cities is the integration of different means of public transport to reduce energy consumption and vehicle emissions. Currently, a lot of research and work is being conducted on efficient interchange plans that enable a seamless combination of different modes of transport. This is essential to encourage people to use public transport, among other things. According to a study by Transport for London (2018), the introduction of integrated ticketing and payment systems has significantly increased public transport and reduced CO2 emissions by 180,000 t per year [37]. A Chinese study shows that the integration of different modes of public transport has also contributed to a 3.5% annual increase in employment in the transport sector [38].
The decomposition of the bus fleet structure in urban agglomerations is currently being carried out around the world. These studies provide a wealth of information on the differences in emissions from different fuel types and vehicle propulsion systems. In general, buses powered by petrol or diesel engines emit a higher amount of, e.g., particulates and nitrogen oxides compared to hydrogen [39]. However, the use of modern solutions for these buses and the use of other alternative fuels, e.g., CNG, helps to reduce the emissions of toxic compounds, in order to reduce their impact on the health of city dwellers as much as possible. An example of a paper that addresses the implementation of CNG-powered buses is [40], where the authors show how the introduction of CNG has reduced the impact of bus emissions on air pollution in Delhi, India.
It is also important to use different emission forecasting models to predict the potential of different bus fleet decomposition strategies as an effective tool to reduce air pollution. Through such analyses, multiple scenarios can be tested to determine the optimum strategy for sustainable public transport, thus contributing to emission reduction targets in line with transport policies in different parts of the world. An example of such work is, e.g., [41], where the authors analyze the introduction of HEVs and BEVs and their impact on emission reductions for CO, NOx, and PM using the calculation method of the HBEFA model.
The topic addressed is very important in the context of the current literature review and can be an important contribution to the further development of different bus fleet decomposition strategies. Studies by the WHO (World Health Organisation) and other health organizations provide important epidemiological data to estimate the reduction in morbidity and mortality as a result of improved air quality. For example, a WHO (2018) report showed that a reduction in PM2.5 concentrations by 10 μg/m3 could reduce deaths from respiratory diseases by approximately 15% in cities [42].

3. Research Methodology

The existing emission models are categorized into two distinct types:
  • Models that utilize traffic parameters such as acceleration, braking, continuous driving, and idling, functioning at the microscale and mesoscale levels.
  • Models founded on the average speed of a vehicle, primarily employed at the macro level.
Macro-scale models primarily rely on the average speed parameter of the specific road section(s) under analysis [43]. These models are instrumental in approximating both fuel consumption and the ecological footprint of road transportation. They enable the assessment of the overall energy consumption attributed to road infrastructure development initiatives and strategies, as well as the evaluation of the ecological ramifications pertaining to greenhouse gas emissions within the study region. The environmental effects can span local, regional, or even global domains, encompassing both short- and long-term implications. Macro-scale emission models facilitate the quantification of the extensive impact of transportation, whether on a regional scale or within a designated transportation corridor.
For the purpose of calculating emissions, the most commonly used method for project evaluation is the use of COPERT software [44,45]. COPERT is a model for macro-scale emissions calculations based on European data using the distance traveled, vehicle type, emission class, driving speed, load, humidity, and air temperature [46].
The mass of pollutants emitted in the COPERT model is calculated according to Equation (1):
E i = j   m F C j , m · E F i , j , m
where:
Ei—emissions of the exhaust component i (g);
FCj,m—fuel consumption of vehicle of category j, for fuel m (kg);
EFi,j,m—emission factor of component i for vehicle category j and fuel m (g/kg).
This model encompasses a range of fuels, including diesel, gasoline, CNG, and LPG. The current methodology employed in macro-scale emission models for assessing the quantity of detrimental exhaust constituents is characterized by two fundamental calculations. The initial step involves the selection of a set of emission factors that dictate emissions based on specific traffic conditions, while the subsequent stage entails the evaluation of vehicular activity within the designated study area. Emission levels are derived by multiplying the outcomes of these two stages.
Consequently, the COPERT emissions calculator was employed to evaluate the implications of replacing the aging bus fleet with a newer one, focusing on the municipality of Rzeszow. The project also encompasses the establishment of park-and-ride (P&R) facilities situated in suburban regions.
Within the study, two distinct scenarios, denoted as variants, were examined:
  • V0: This serves as a counterfactual scenario, considering emissions from the old bus fleet (accounting for no P&R service and additional passenger car trips).
  • V1: Represents the existing scenario, encompassing emissions from the novel low-emission bus fleet (excluding any additional passenger car trips due to the presence of the current P&R service).
For the V0 scenario (a scenario assuming no investment), emissions from buses prior to replacement were computed, along with emissions projections for passenger cars that would have been utilized in the absence of the project and its associated P&R parking. The analysis spanned the period from 3 January 2021 to 2 January 2023. The data used for these calculations were sourced from the Association of Rzeszow Municipalities. Emission calculations were conducted in accordance with the EMEP/EEA methodology [46], integrated into COPERT 5.6.5. A comprehensive overview of the study’s framework is depicted in Figure 3.

3.1. Description of the Area of the Implemented Project

The project was executed within the confines of Rzeszow, which is situated in Poland. Rzeszow holds the status of being the capital of the Subcarpathian Voivodeship and stands as the central hub of the Rzeszow agglomeration, boasting a populace of approximately 200,000 individuals [47]. This city accommodates six universities, and its vicinity is graced by an international airport positioned near Jasionka.
In order to facilitate the COPERT emission calculations, pertinent meteorological data concerning the analyzed region are required, encompassing variables like annual temperature and humidity. The weather conditions characteristic of the Rzeszow agglomeration are depicted in Figure 4.
The urban transportation network within the Rzeszow agglomeration encompasses a total of 63 bus lines. In 2015, a comprehensive system was introduced, aiming to seamlessly integrate public transportation services not only within Rzeszow itself but also across the adjoining areas. This overarching system incorporates multiple enhancements, including the implementation of traffic light control mechanisms designed to prioritize public transport vehicles. Furthermore, the system encompasses an online vehicle tracking system, an information dissemination system, the adoption of electronic ticketing, and the establishment of stationary ticket vending machines. To support the realization of these enhancements, Rzeszow secured supplementary funding from European Union resources.
As part of these developments, a diverse fleet of buses has been procured, spanning modern diesel and CNG, along with hybrid and electric models. The city also enjoys the convenience of a well-connected rail transportation network, facilitating travel between suburban locales and the city center, and further extending to encompass rural and international rail connections. In recent years, the establishment of park-and-ride (P&R) facilities in suburban regions has contributed to the overall transportation landscape. Figure 5 provides an overview of the study area, encompassing the city of Rzeszow and its affiliated municipalities, alongside an approximate depiction of the P&R spaces.

3.2. Description of the Vehicle Fleet under Study

The bus fleet involved in this study encompassed a total of 52 vehicles operating across 13 distinct lines. Following the project’s implementation, the outdated bus fleet underwent a comprehensive overhaul, with the entire roster being replaced by modern vehicles procured for this purpose. The original bus fleet comprised 29 buses without assigned emission classes, while the remaining 23 adhered to EURO II standards. This fleet underwent replacement with EURO VI-compliant buses, the majority of which were manufactured post-2019. For a comprehensive overview of the bus fleet composition, please refer to Table 1. Furthermore, an in-depth breakdown of the bus fleet data, serving as input for COPERT calculations, is furnished in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials.
Input data crucial for the COPERT emissions calculator encompassed average mileage per vehicle, which was sourced from the transportation operator. These mileage figures underwent individual adjustments for each bus line. Alongside this, other essential parameters consisted of average speed and load for each of the examined bus lines. The average speed and load metrics for the buses were derived from factual data made available by the transportation operator. These aforementioned parameters, pivotal for subsequent emission calculations, are outlined in Table 2 and Table 3. Subsequently, PM emissions were computed utilizing these input parameters. The calculations for PM emissions were carried out for each line independently, and the ensuing averages were calculated for each of the analyzed variants.
Emission assessments also encompass passenger car emissions. Given the project’s scope, which involves the substitution of the old bus fleet with new buses and the establishment of fresh park-and-ride (P&R) facilities, the analyses account for a specific quantity of passenger cars operating on the road in the scenario without P&R facilities. The research encompasses four P&R locations, serving as parking points for over 150,000 vehicles throughout the examined two-year period. The data pertaining to the volume of vehicles utilizing these P&R parking zones were sourced from road management authorities at the respective locations.
In the V0 scenario, characterized by the absence of P&R parking lots, the study postulated that passenger cars would travel an approximately equivalent distance to buses, originating from the existing P&R parking lots. The average distances for each driver were multiplied by the overall count of vehicles utilizing the P&R facilities. Specifics regarding the number of vehicles within the P&R zones are shown in Table 4.
Figure 6 shows the percentages of passenger cars, taking into account the emission standards and fuels used, adopted for calculations in the COPERT model. These data were adopted based on information contained in the statistical data for Rzeszow County.
Emissions originating from passenger cars within the V0 scenario were computed using data encompassing the number of cars within each park-and-ride (P&R) parking facility, coupled with an estimated average travel distance derived from the buses utilized by the car drivers who parked in the P&R lots (as detailed in Table 4). The study’s assumption posited that the distance covered by car drivers utilizing the parking facilities equates to half the distance covered by the buses of each line, originating from the stops situated close to the parking facilities and culminating at the final stops. To facilitate these calculations, data pertaining to the number of cars were employed, segregated by both fuel type and emission class [47]. These specific details are presented in Table 5.

4. Results and Discussion

The proposed methodology and its practical implementation are exemplified through a comparative analysis of two bus fleet variants, focusing on PM and NOx emissions. As previously outlined, variant V0 encompasses the original bus fleet and supplementary car trips resulting from the absence of park-and-ride (P&R) facilities. Conversely, variant V1 involves a modern low-emission bus fleet and the establishment of new P&R spaces in suburban regions.
Emission calculations were conducted using authentic data spanning a two-year interval from the beginning of 2021 to the start of 2023. These calculations were grounded in actual information sourced from bus journeys and road infrastructure.
The quantifiable reduction in emissions was evaluated utilizing the following Formula (2) [15]:
Δ E = E o E 1
where:
ΔE—reduction in pollutant (PM2.5, PM10, and NOX) emissions;
Eo—non-investment scenario emissions (variant V0);
E1—emissions related to the implementation of the project (variant V1).
The outcomes of PM emission calculations pertaining to the V0 variant (i.e., the former vehicle fleet with the absence of park-and-ride parking lots) for each of the examined bus lines are consolidated and presented in Table 6.
The computed PM and NOX emissions for the V0 variant from passenger cars for the analyzed two-year period (2021–2022) are shown in Table 7.
Table 8 shows the computed values of PM and NOX emissions for new buses in the V1 variant for each bus line.
For the analyzed two-year period, the estimated average annual decrease in PM and NOX emissions associated with the project is shown in Table 9.
Thanks to the implementation of the project, i.e., the replacement of 52 old buses with new buses of the Euro VI emission class and the construction of new P&R spaces, the total average annual reduction in emissions amounted to approximately 703.6 kg of PM10, approximately 692.7 kg of PM2.5, and a reduction of approximately 10.4 tons of NOX. With the introduction of P&R zones, the average annual reduction in particulate emissions was about 120 kg. In terms of NOx emission reductions, the replacement of the bus fleet reduced NOx emissions by about 9867 kg, while the average annual reduction in emissions due to the use of P&R parking lots was about 500 kg.
An additional significant aspect concerns the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, which was thoroughly examined in the referenced article [15]. Consequently, the execution of such projects assumes a pivotal role in addressing the escalating challenges related to particulate and gaseous emissions, inclusive of greenhouse gases, as well as the resultant concern over global warming. Leveraging the methodology presented in this study, the substitution of a fleet comprising 52 buses and the establishment of park-and-ride (P&R) zones yielded remarkable outcomes: PM2.5 emissions were curtailed by over 690 tons, PM10 emissions by more than 700.0 kg, and NOx emissions by more than 10.3 tons within a single year. Considering emissions from buses only (Figure 7), it can be concluded that after the fleet was replaced with a new one, the relative emissions of PM10, PM2.5, and NOX were about 15.6%, 8.8%, and 6.1%, respectively.
It is also worth highlighting the problem of data sensitivity analysis. This work is based on a data set provided by the transport operator and based on statistical data from a local data bank. An analysis of a certain range of data would give a possibly more complete picture of a certain effect, e.g., a quantitative change in the fleet of vehicles meeting certain EURO standards, as the vehicle fleet is subject to continuous modification due to aging and the registration of new vehicles. An example of a paper that addresses this problem is [48], where the authors analyze the sensitivity of the input data to the output data of the COPERT model. The uncertainty analysis of the emission results shows differences ranging from −58% to 76%.
As is well known, during the winter season, emissions of dust and gaseous pollutants also come from individual heat sources used by residents. Taking into account the pollutants analyzed, the average annual dust emissions from a single solid-fuel boiler in a single-family home, according to [49], can range from about 17.5 kg/year of PM10 (using a biomass boiler) to approximately 20.5 kg/year of PM10 (for a coal-fired boiler). For the average annual NOx emissions, these values are about 6.6 kg/year for a biomass boiler and about 7.20 kg/year for a coal boiler, respectively. If a condensing gas boiler is used, these emissions can average about 0.67 kg/year for PM10 and about 3.61 kg/year for NOX.
Therefore, it can be seen that the estimated annual reduction in pollutant emissions analyzed by replacing the bus fleet and introducing P&R zones is equivalent to the annual emissions of about 35 coal-fired boilers used in a single-family home with a heating demand of about 8000 kWh/year. Thus, in order to achieve improvements in air quality during the winter season, it is very important to replace solid-fuel heat sources with other low-emission heat sources, such as condensing gas boilers or heat pumps.
On the other hand, with NOX emissions in mind, it can be said that it is very important to modernize the bus fleet and expand P&R zones. The value of the average estimated reduction in NOX emissions after project implementation, at about 10,370 kg/year, corresponds to the annual emissions of about 1500 coal-fired boilers.
When comparing the methodology and results used to other works, many differences can be observed in the conduct of this study. For example, the work [50] describes a similar problem but with a different approach. This paper introduces a remaining life additional benefit–cost (RLABC) analysis approach, aiming to maximize net benefits by either the early retirement of buses or retrofitting buses within their lifespans. By assessing net benefits for different bus types, optimal fleet management schemes are identified for both operators and governments. This approach enables the creation of government subsidy plans for win-win solutions, enhancing efficiency and flexibility in fleet management. Using a case study of Hong Kong’s largest bus company, the study demonstrates the considerable benefits of this approach over fixed retirement plans. Another example is the work presented in [44]. This study investigates the emission status and future trends of heavy-duty diesel passenger buses in Hainan Province. It employs statistical analysis to assess the technical distribution, activity patterns, and operational conditions of these buses. Emissions of CO, CO2, NOX, and PM in 2017 are calculated using the COPERT model, with additional refinement through calibration using Portable Emission Measurement System data. Three emission scenarios are considered: baseline, emission reduction standard, and emission reduction standard combined with the replacement of diesel buses by electric vehicles. Utilizing a gray model, the study predicts the number of heavy-duty diesel passenger buses in each scenario and combines this with calibrated emission factors to project emission trends. The results indicate that the emission reduction standard alone will lead to significant reductions in CO, CO2, NOX, and PM emissions by 2025, with even more substantial reductions achieved when combined with electric vehicle adoption, highlighting the potential for significant environmental improvements.
The introduction of the above-described retrofitting of the fleet and public transport apparently brings some benefits in terms of ambient air quality. However, taking into account all urban and non-urban emissions, this improvement in air quality represents a margin and may be symbolic overall. However, every step to improve air quality, even a local one, should be taken, because with small steps one can achieve a certain satisfactory long-term effect.
Building upon the developed methodology, a comparative assessment was undertaken, gauging PM and NOx emissions. The evaluation encompassed two distinct scenarios: firstly, the condition preceding the replacement of the existing bus fleet with a novel one, and secondly, an envisaged situation featuring the new bus fleet, coupled with the establishment of park-and-ride (P&R) parking facilities. In Central and Eastern European countries, old bus fleets are common [51,52]. Calculations of particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions, based on replacing bus fleets with new ones, show significant reductions in the emissions of these pollutants.
Achieving a significant reduction in air pollutant dust emissions is crucial to improving the quality of life and health of society.

5. Conclusions

The primary aim of this study was to introduce a methodology geared towards the computation of PM and NOx emissions attributed to bus fleets. This methodology was employed to conduct a practical case study within the vicinity of the Rzeszow municipality. For this analysis, authentic data pertaining to 52 buses operating across 13 suburban bus lines were employed.
The conducted research allows us to formulate the following conclusions:
  • Replacement of the bus fleet with a new one resulted in a decrease in PM10 emissions by about 84.4%, PM2.5 emissions by about 91.2%, and NOX emissions by about 93.9%;
  • Taking into account the additional introduction of the P&R system (abandoning self-driven cars in favor of buses), the estimated decrease in emissions of the analyzed pollutants would additionally increase by about 1.3% for PM10, by about 0.6% for PM2.5, and by about 0.3% for NOX;
  • Solid-fuel heating systems used in single-family homes are mainly responsible for PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution;
  • For the implemented project (introduction of a P&R system and the replacement of the bus fleet), NOX emission reductions equivalent to the elimination of about 1500 solid-fuel heating systems used in single-family homes can be achieved.
The results of the impact of the analyzed transport scenarios on air quality have an application value and they can be used as an example helpful in the decision-making process in urban management.
A constraint inherent to the present study lies in its focus, indicating a prospective avenue for subsequent investigations. A noteworthy facet for future research involves the incorporation of additional exhaust constituents within the analytical framework. Furthermore, a compelling prospect pertains to the exploration of emissions associated with alternative bus propulsion configurations, including electric or hydrogen-powered buses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en16196956/s1; Table S1: Emission model input (COPERT): comparison between the existing fleet of buses (left) and the newly replaced buses (right), featuring fundamental factors such as euro standard, manufacturing year, and curb weight.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J., M.M. and H.K.; methodology, A.J. and M.M.; software, A.J. and M.M.; validation, V.M., H.K. and A.J.; formal analysis, A.J., V.M., P.W., M.M., H.K., B.B., M.Ś. and S.P.; investigation, A.J. and H.K.; resources, A.J., V.M., B.B., M.Ś., S.P. and M.M.; data curation, A.J. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J., V.M., P.W., H.K., B.B., S.P. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, A.J., V.M., H.K., B.B., S.P., P.W, M.Ś. and M.M.; visualization, A.J. and M.M.; supervision, A.J., V.M., H.K. and P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors wish to acknowledge the Polish Ministry of Education and Science and the Rzeszow University of Technology for supporting this research.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Association of Municipalities “Podkarpacka Komunikacja Samochodowa” in Rzeszów for participating in the described research and for allowing the presentation of the results of the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CNGCompressed natural gas
CO2Carbon dioxide
CO2eCarbon dioxide equivalent
EGDEuropean Green Deal
GWP Global warming potential
LPGLiquefied petroleum gas
NOXNitrogen oxides
P&R Park and ride
PMParticulate matter
PM2.5Particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less
PM10Particulate matter with a diameter of 10 μm or less

References

  1. European Environment Agency. Air Quality in Europe 2022; Report No. 05/2022; EEA: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. European Environment Agency. European Union Emission Inventory Report 1990–2021; Under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention): EEA Report XX/2023; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023; Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-emissions-inventory-report-1990-2021/at_download/file (accessed on 20 July 2023).
  3. National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management. Measurement Data Bank. Available online: https://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/archives (accessed on 15 March 2020).
  4. Bielaczyc, P.; Szczotka, A.; Woodburn, J. Exhaust emissions of particulate matter from light-duty vehicles—An overview and the current situation. Combust. Engines 2017, 171, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Merkisz, J.; Kozak, M.; Molik, P.; Nijak, D.; Andrzejewski, M.; Nowak, M.; Rymaniak, Ł.; Ziółkowski, A. The analysis of the emission level from a heavy-duty truck in city traffic. Combust. Engines 2012, 150, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hvan der Gon, D.; Hulskotte, J.; Jozwicka, M.; Kranenburg, R.; Kuenen, J.; Visschedijk, A. Chapter 5—European Emission Inventories and Projections for Road Transport Non-Exhaust Emissions: Analysis of Consistency and Gaps in Emission Inventories. In Non-Exhaust Emissions; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Giechaskiel, B.; Joshi, A.; Ntziachristos, L.; Dilara, P. European Regulatory Framework and Particulate Matter Emissions of Gasoline Light-Duty Vehicles: A Review. Catalysts 2019, 9, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smieszek, M.; Mateichyk, V.; Dobrzanska, M.; Dobrzanski, P.; Weigang, G. The Impact of the Pandemic on Vehicle Traffic and Roadside Environmental Pollution: Rzeszow City as a Case Study. Energies 2021, 14, 4299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jaworski, A.; Lejda, K.; Bilski, M. Effect of driving resistances on energy demand and exhaust emission in motor vehicles. Combust. Engines 2022, 189, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, R.; Zhang, F.; Peng, Z.; Pei, Y. The NOx emission characteristics of gasoline vehicles during transient driving cycles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 109, 103386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mateichyk, V.; Kostian, N.; Smieszek, M.; Mosciszewski, J.; Tarandushka, L. Evaluating Vehicle Energy Efficiency in Urban Transport Systems Based on Fuzzy Logic Models. Energies 2023, 16, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Samaras, Z.; Hausberger, S. Preliminary findings on possible Euro 7 emission limits for LD and HD vehicles. In Proceedings of the AGVES Meeting, Online, 27 October 2020; Available online: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/fdd70a2d-b50a-4d0b-a92a-e64d41d0e947/CLOVE%20test%20limits%20AGVES%202020-10-27%20final%20vs2.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  13. European Commission. Commission Proposes New Euro 7 Standards to Reduce Pollutant Emissions from Vehicles and Improve Air Quality. 2022. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6495 (accessed on 15 June 2023).
  14. Holman, C.; Harrison, R.; Querol, X. Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 111, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jaworski, A.; Mądziel, M.; Kuszewski, H. Sustainable Public Transport Strategies—Decomposition of the Bus Fleet and Its Influence on the Decrease in Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Energies 2022, 15, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diffenbaugh, N.S.; Barnes, E.A. Data-driven predictions of the time remaining until critical global warming thresholds are reached. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 120, e2207183120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dimitriades, B. Effects of hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxides on photochemical smog formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1972, 6, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krzeszowiak, J.; Pawlas, K. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), properties and epidemiological significance in respiratory and circulatory diseases. A review of the literature on the effects of short- and long-term exposure. Med. Srod. 2018, 21, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. WHO. Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  20. Atkinson, R.W.; Anderson, H.R.; Sunyer, J.; Ayres, J.; Baccini, M.; Vonk, J.M.; Boumghar, A.; Forastiere, F.; Forsberg, B.; Touloumi, G.; et al. Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Respiratory Admissions Results from APHEA 2 PrOject. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 1860–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Muñoz-Ibañéz, F.; Maldonado-Alcaíno, A.; Jack, D.; Yan, B.; Xu, L.; Acuña, M.; Leiva-Guzman, M.; Valdés, A.; Cáceres, D. Cancer Burden Disease Attributable to PM2.5 and Health Risk by PM2.5-bound Toxic Species in Two Urban Chilean Municipalities. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2022, 22, 220247. Available online: https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-22-06-oa-0247.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2023). [CrossRef]
  22. Jakovljević, I.; Smoljo, I.; Sever Štrukil, Z.; Pehnec, G. Carcinogenic Activity and Risk Assessment of PAHs in Ambient Air: PM10 Particle Fraction and Bulk Deposition. Toxics 2023, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Turner, M.C.; Krewski, D.; Pope, A.C.; Chen, Y.; Gapstur, S.M.; Thun, M.J. Long-term Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Lung Cancer in a Large Cohort of Never-Smokers. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 18, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tramuto, F.; Cusimano, R.; Cerame, G.; Vulltagio, M.; Calamusa, G.; Maida, C.M.; Vitale, F. Urban air pollution and emergency roomadmissions for respiratory symptoms: A casecrossover study in Palermo, Italy. Environ. Health 2011, 10, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. WHO. Health Effects of Particulate Matter: Policy Implications for Countreis in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia; WHO Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013. Available online: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/344854?show=full (accessed on 27 July 2023).
  26. Brook, R.D.; Rajagopalan, S.; Pope, C.A.; Brook, J.R.; Bhatnagar, A.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; Holguin, F.; Hong, Y.; Luepker, R.V.; Mittleman, M.A.; et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 121, 2331–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. COMEAP. Committee on The Medical Effects of Air Pollutants 2015: Statement: The Evidence for the Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Health; Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants: London, UK, 2023. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nitrogen-dioxide-health--effects-ofexposure (accessed on 26 July 2023).
  28. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen—Health Criteria. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Available online: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=526855 (accessed on 27 July 2023).
  29. Laden, F.; Schwartz, J.; Speizer, F.E.; Dockery, D.W. Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. Extended Followup of the Harvard Six Cities Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boldo, E.; Medina, S.; Le Tertre, A.; Hurley, F.; Mücke, H.G.; Ballester, F.; Aguilera, I.; Eilstein, D. Health Impact Assessment of Long-term Exposure to PM2.5 in 23 European Cities. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 21, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wolf, S.; Teitge, J.; Mielke, J.; Schütze, F.; Jaeger, C. The European Green Deal—More than climate neutrality. Intereconomics 2021, 56, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Paulsson, A. Making the sustainable more sustainable: Public transport and the collaborative spaces of policy translation. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2018, 20, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elliott, M.; Kittner, N. Operational grid and environmental impacts for a V2G-enabled electric school bus fleet using DC fast chargers. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 30, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsoi, K.H.; Loo, B.P.; Li, X.; Zhang, K. The co-benefits of electric mobility in reducing traffic noise and chemical air pollution: Insights from a transit-oriented city. Environ. Int. 2023, 178, 108116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pietrzak, K.; Pietrzak, O. Environmental Effects of Electromobility in a Sustainable Urban Public Transport. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Połom, M.; Wiśniewski, P. Implementing Electromobility in Public Transport in Poland in 1990–2020. A Review of Experiences and Evaluation of the Current Development Directions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Allen, J.; Piecyk, M.; Cherrett, T.; Juhari, M.N.; McLeod, F.; Piotrowska, M.; Bates, O.; Bektas, T.; Cheliotis, K.; Friday, A.; et al. Understanding the transport and CO2 impacts of on-demand meal deliveries: A London case study. Cities 2021, 108, 102973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, Q. Changing urban form and transport CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis of Beijing, China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 4558–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, C.C.; Liao, Y.T.; Chang, Y.W. Life cycle assessment of alternative energy types–including hydrogen–for public city buses in Taiwan. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 18472–18482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Krelling, C.; Badami, M.G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of compressed natural gas implementation in the public bus transit fleet in Delhi, India. Transp. Pol. 2022, 115, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Konečný, V.; Gnap, J.; Settey, T.; Petro, F.; Skrúcaný, T.; Figlus, T. Environmental Sustainability of the Vehicle Fleet Change in Public City Transport of Selected City in Central Europe. Energies 2020, 13, 3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ding, D.; Xing, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, K.; Hao, J. Estimated contributions of emissions controls, meteorological factors, population growth, and changes in baseline mortality to reductions in ambient PM 2.5 and PM 2.5-related mortality in China, 2013–2017. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 067009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mądziel, M.; Campisi, T.; Jaworski, A.; Kuszewski, H.; Woś, P. Assessing Vehicle Emissions from a Multi-Lane to Turbo Roundabout Conversion Using a Microsimulation Tool. Energies 2021, 14, 4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, F.; Zhuang, J.; Cheng, X.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Yan, Z. Investigation and Prediction of Heavy-Duty Diesel Passenger Bus Emissions in Hainan Using a COPERT Model. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ali, M.; Kamal, M.D.; Tahir, A.; Atif, S. Fuel Consumption Monitoring through COPERT Model—A Case Study for Urban Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. EEA. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2019; Update October 2020; EEA: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020; Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/at_download/file (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  47. Polish Local Data Bank. Available online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  48. Dey, S.; Caulfield, B.; Ghosh, B. Modelling uncertainty of vehicular emissions inventory: A case study of Ireland. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hałacz, J.; Skotnicka-Siepsiak, A.; Neugebauer, M. Assessment of Reducing Pollutant Emissions in Selected Heating and Ventilation Systems in Single-Family Houses. Energies 2020, 13, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, L.; Lo, H.K.; Cen, X. Optimal bus fleet management strategy for emissions reduction. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 41, 330–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niemczyk, J.; Sus, A.; Borowski, K.; Jasiński, B.; Jasińska, K. The Dominant Motives of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Energy Sector in Western Europe from the Perspective of Green Economy. Energies 2022, 15, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Patella, S.M.; Serafini, S. Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts. Sustainability 2019, 11, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Average levels of NOX, PM2.5, and PM10 in the air in Rzeszow in 2019 (data from the monitoring station on Pilsudski Street).
Figure 1. Average levels of NOX, PM2.5, and PM10 in the air in Rzeszow in 2019 (data from the monitoring station on Pilsudski Street).
Energies 16 06956 g001
Figure 2. General diagram showing the methodology for calculating PM and NOX emissions for buses and passenger cars.
Figure 2. General diagram showing the methodology for calculating PM and NOX emissions for buses and passenger cars.
Energies 16 06956 g002
Figure 3. Diagram showing authors’ logic for the PM and NOX emission calculation methodology.
Figure 3. Diagram showing authors’ logic for the PM and NOX emission calculation methodology.
Energies 16 06956 g003
Figure 4. The weather conditions characteristic of the Rzeszow agglomeration (macroscale calculation input data).
Figure 4. The weather conditions characteristic of the Rzeszow agglomeration (macroscale calculation input data).
Energies 16 06956 g004
Figure 5. Map illustrating the research area with marked locations of park-and-ride facilities [15].
Figure 5. Map illustrating the research area with marked locations of park-and-ride facilities [15].
Energies 16 06956 g005
Figure 6. The percentages of passenger cars by (a) emission standard and (b) fuel used.
Figure 6. The percentages of passenger cars by (a) emission standard and (b) fuel used.
Energies 16 06956 g006
Figure 7. Relative emissions of PM10, PM2.5, and NOX from buses for the analyzed variants.
Figure 7. Relative emissions of PM10, PM2.5, and NOX from buses for the analyzed variants.
Energies 16 06956 g007
Table 1. Comparison between the original bus fleet (left side) and the new replacement buses (right side), inclusive of fundamental parameters such as the count and EURO standard. These details serve as input for COPERT calculations.
Table 1. Comparison between the original bus fleet (left side) and the new replacement buses (right side), inclusive of fundamental parameters such as the count and EURO standard. These details serve as input for COPERT calculations.
Fleet of Buses Prior to ReplacementFleet of Buses following Replacement
Quantity of Buses Standard Quantity of Buses Standard
29-52EURO VI
23EURO II
Table 2. Actual operational data from the bus fleet incorporated to perform emission calculations for the studied bus lines in the year 2021.
Table 2. Actual operational data from the bus fleet incorporated to perform emission calculations for the studied bus lines in the year 2021.
Route Occupancy (%)Average Speed (km/h)Yearly Distance Traveled (km)
11127.894,097
2633.439,398
3826.5116,657
41128.185,188
5830.282,186
6528.564,976
71328.193,263
81123.6193,972
91431.639,197
102232.395,098
111227.1112,724
121027.562,215
13926.248,549
Table 3. Authentic operational data from the bus fleet utilized to conduct emission calculations for the investigated bus lines in the year 2022.
Table 3. Authentic operational data from the bus fleet utilized to conduct emission calculations for the investigated bus lines in the year 2022.
Route Occupancy (%)Average Speed (km/h)Yearly Distance Traveled (km)
129.327.8101,816
223.533.480,534
34.626.591,688
45.028.177,675
54.630.274,557
67.028.553,005
713.628.174,325
813.623.6181,959
918.031.631,950
1026.032.3103,037
1110.227.190,407
1210.727.554,633
1316.526.254,002
Table 4. Data on passenger cars at P&R locations for the 2-year period analyzed.
Table 4. Data on passenger cars at P&R locations for the 2-year period analyzed.
ParkingQuantity of VehiclesMean Approximate Distance Covered by Drivers (km)
152,01210.0
229,37522.4
364,41013.0
4574414.0
Table 5. Quantity of passenger cars categorized by distinct fuel type and emission standard, serving as inputs for COPERT calculations.
Table 5. Quantity of passenger cars categorized by distinct fuel type and emission standard, serving as inputs for COPERT calculations.
P&RFuelQuantity of Vehicles
Euro Standard
-123456
Parking 1Petrol3902156039006242468226003120
Diesel2574103025744120309017162060
LPG13265301326212215928841062
Sum52,012
Parking 2Petrol220488122023526264514691762
Diesel14545831454232717479701162
LPG7482987481198898500599
Sum29,375
Parking 3Petrol4830193248327730579832203864
Diesel3188127631885102382621262550
LPG164265616422628197010961314
Sum64,410
Parking 4Petrol230144202230460804804
Diesel15294132152304530530
LPG78486878156274274
Sum5744
Table 6. PM emission (kg) and NOX emission (kg) calculation results of the V0 variant for the old bus fleet.
Table 6. PM emission (kg) and NOX emission (kg) calculation results of the V0 variant for the old bus fleet.
LinePM10PM2.5NOx
202120222021202220212022
161695661842911
224492245337690
3626074561056830
455545150760751
552514847721709
641433840578603
760645659832891
813215312314218112092
925242422352325
1059675462822969
117376687010151054
1240423739558577
1332353033441490
Annual sum71678768172610,12510,892
Sum1503140721,017
Table 7. PM10, PM2.5, and NOX emission calculation results of the V0 variant for passenger cars.
Table 7. PM10, PM2.5, and NOX emission calculation results of the V0 variant for passenger cars.
P&RPM10 (kg)PM2.5 (kg)NOx (kg)
Parking 135.626.1250.8
Parking 245.033.1317.3
Parking 357.342.1403.7
Parking 40.70.526.9
Sum138.6101.8998.7
Table 8. PM10, PM2.5, and NOX emission (kg) calculation results of the V1 variant for new EURO VI buses.
Table 8. PM10, PM2.5, and NOX emission (kg) calculation results of the V1 variant for new EURO VI buses.
LinePM10PM2.5NOx
202120222021202220212022
19.411.05.05.551.856.1
23.88.52.04.219.940.7
311.58.96.14.765.751.7
48.58.24.54.346.746.2
58.17.84.34.143.642.9
66.36.63.43.535.437
79.410.05.05.351.154.8
819.522.710.312.0115.8133.8
94.03.72.12.021.720.1
1010.010.85.25.849.143.4
1111.311.66.06.162.965.3
126.26.43.33.434.535.6
134.85.42.52.827.530.6
Annual sum112.8121.659.763.7625.7658.2
Sum234.4123.41283.9
Table 9. Estimated average annual reduction in PM and NOX emissions.
Table 9. Estimated average annual reduction in PM and NOX emissions.
Information Regarding the Studied ScenariosPM10 (kg)PM2.5 (kg)NOX (kg)
Projected mean annual emission decrease due to bus replacement634.3641.89867.0
Projected mean yearly emission decrease resulting from drivers utilizing P&R facilities69.350.9499.3
Overall mean annual projected emission decrease703.6692.710,366.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaworski, A.; Mateichyk, V.; Kuszewski, H.; Mądziel, M.; Woś, P.; Babiarz, B.; Śmieszek, M.; Porada, S. Towards Cleaner Cities: An Analysis of the Impact of Bus Fleet Decomposition on PM and NOX Emissions Reduction in Sustainable Public Transport. Energies 2023, 16, 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196956

AMA Style

Jaworski A, Mateichyk V, Kuszewski H, Mądziel M, Woś P, Babiarz B, Śmieszek M, Porada S. Towards Cleaner Cities: An Analysis of the Impact of Bus Fleet Decomposition on PM and NOX Emissions Reduction in Sustainable Public Transport. Energies. 2023; 16(19):6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaworski, Artur, Vasyl Mateichyk, Hubert Kuszewski, Maksymilian Mądziel, Paweł Woś, Bożena Babiarz, Mirosław Śmieszek, and Sławomir Porada. 2023. "Towards Cleaner Cities: An Analysis of the Impact of Bus Fleet Decomposition on PM and NOX Emissions Reduction in Sustainable Public Transport" Energies 16, no. 19: 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196956

APA Style

Jaworski, A., Mateichyk, V., Kuszewski, H., Mądziel, M., Woś, P., Babiarz, B., Śmieszek, M., & Porada, S. (2023). Towards Cleaner Cities: An Analysis of the Impact of Bus Fleet Decomposition on PM and NOX Emissions Reduction in Sustainable Public Transport. Energies, 16(19), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop