Next Article in Journal
Research on the Modulation and Control Strategy for a Novel Single-Phase Current Source Inverter
Next Article in Special Issue
Lithofacies Identification from Wire-Line Logs Using an Unsupervised Data Clustering Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Intrinsic Photoconductivity Spectral Dependence as a Tool for Prediction of Open-Circuit Voltage in Organic Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part I
 
 
Correction published on 21 January 2026, see Energies 2026, 19(2), 532.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II

1
School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
2
Institute of Geoenergy, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, 73100 Chania, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(18), 6727; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186727
Submission received: 17 July 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023 / Corrected: 21 January 2026

Abstract

In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) has become a buzzword in the petroleum industry, with numerous applications which guide engineers in better decision making. The most powerful tool that most production development decisions rely on is reservoir simulation with applications in multiple modeling procedures, such as individual simulation runs, history matching and production forecast and optimization. However, all of these applications lead to considerable computational time and computer resource-associated costs, rendering reservoir simulators as not fast and robust enough, and thus introducing the need for more time-efficient and intelligent tools, such as ML models which are able to adapt and provide fast and competent results that mimic the simulator’s performance within an acceptable error margin. In a recent paper, the developed ML applications in a subsurface reservoir simulation were reviewed, focusing on improving the speed and accuracy of individual reservoir simulation runs and history matching. This paper consists of the second part of that study, offering a detailed review of ML-based Production Forecast Optimization (PFO). This review can assist engineers as a complete source for applied ML techniques in reservoir simulation since, with the generation of large-scale data in everyday activities, ML is becoming a necessity for future and more efficient applications.
Keywords: review; machine learning; reservoir simulation; history matching; production optimization; production forecast review; machine learning; reservoir simulation; history matching; production optimization; production forecast

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samnioti, A.; Gaganis, V. Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II. Energies 2023, 16, 6727. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186727

AMA Style

Samnioti A, Gaganis V. Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II. Energies. 2023; 16(18):6727. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samnioti, Anna, and Vassilis Gaganis. 2023. "Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II" Energies 16, no. 18: 6727. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186727

APA Style

Samnioti, A., & Gaganis, V. (2023). Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II. Energies, 16(18), 6727. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop