Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- The expansion of digital twins of physical systems, which radically increase the productivity of large production chains;
- -
- Reliance on artificial intelligence in predicting and preventing equipment failures and danger conditions;
- -
- Iterative simulation of the approaches in generative design using machine learning;
- -
- Replacement of people—machine operators—by managers of collaborative robots;
- -
- Transition from company to industry forecasting and coordination based on machine learning.
- -
- Integration of human and machine activities into “augmented” labor—creative, intuitively determined, without excessive automation;
- -
- Formation of flexible and distributed chains for the production of energy sources and their burning in accordance with the need for energy and the increase in energy saving;
- -
- Elimination of labor safety risks.
2. Methodology
3. Mining 4.0 Technological Core
3.1. Computer Integrated Mining
3.2. The Internet of Things
3.3. Digital Twins
3.4. Big Data and Cloud Computing
3.5. Smart Sensors
3.6. Three-Dimensional Scanning and Modeling
3.7. Blockchain
3.8. Neural Networks
3.9. Machine Vision
4. Place of Mining 4.0 and 5.0 in the Expected Expansion of Industry 5.0
5. Technological Platform for the Transition from Mining and Energy 4.0 to 5.0
6. Human-Oriented Core of Mining 5.0
- -
- Expansion of artificial intelligence and smart robots that is safe for humans;
- -
- Creation of flexible intelligent systems for planning investment and extraction of fossil fuels, integrated into the world energy market;
- -
- Designing new energy systems of cities and industrial clusters, taking into account the potential of both renewable and non-renewable energy.
7. Conclusions and Prospects
- -
- Defining the role of Industry 4.0 digital technologies in upgrading mining to a level that meets the needs of its stakeholders in cost-effective production and safe labor and the entire society in cheap, uninterrupted and clean energy;
- -
- Summing up the possibilities of Industry 5.0, which will make fossil fuels extraction and burning an important factor of sustainable energy in the future, when environmental requirements for industry, including in developing countries, will increase radically;
- -
- Defining the basis for the integration of Mining 4.0 and Energy 4.0 technologies within the framework of the future sustainable Energy 5.0. Its supporting elements are the following: intelligent forecasting and planning along the entire energy production chain in the balance of its renewable and non-renewable components; development of intelligent control of power consumption in the mining sector; transition to the production of green fuels (such as hydrogen) from fossil hydrocarbons; implementation of convergent digital post-mining technologies.
- (A)
- Intensification of research activity in the field of integration of digital technologies of renewable and non-renewable energy and uniform and fair satisfaction of the energy needs in all countries, taking into account the availability of hydrocarbons;
- (B)
- Focusing the attention of researchers on the potential of digital technologies of Mining 4.0, and in the future Mining 5.0, in the field of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals related to affordable energy and land and water conservation;
- (C)
- Supplementing existing national energy strategies and charters with provisions on harmonizing the technological development of energy production from renewable and fossil sources and fixing Mining 4.0 and 5.0 technologies as a priority for energy security.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wickens, C.D.; Hollands, J.G.; Banbury, S.; Parasuraman, R. Engineering Psychology & Human Performance; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Stefanini Group. What Is Industry 5.0? How Shifting Objectives Enables Transformation. 4 November 2022. Available online: https://stefanini.com/en/insights/news/what-is-industry-50-how-shifting-objectives-enables-transformation (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Cehlar, M. The structural role of convergent technologies in the modern economy. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2019, 3, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mikhailov, V.G.; Zhironkin, V.S. Development of recycling economy technologies in the context of transition to Industry 4.0. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 4, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T. Technological core and economic aspects of modernization on the Industry 4.0 platform. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 3, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T. Review of national strategies for transition to industry 5.0. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 3, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fataliyev, T.K.; Mehdiyev, S.A. The Impact of Industry 4.0 on the Formation of Science 4.0. Probl. Inf. Technol. 2022, 13, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breque, M.; De Nul, L.; Petridis, A. Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407 (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Singh, R.; Akram, S.V.; Gehlot, A.; Buddhi, D.; Priyadarshi, N.; Twala, B. Energy System 4.0: Digitalization of the Energy Sector with Inclination towards Sustainability. Sensors 2022, 22, 6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elangovan, U. Industry 5.0: The Future of the Industrial Economy; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; 152p. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, C.; Zhang, H. Evaluation of Urban Ecological Livability from a Synergistic Perspective: A Case Study of Beijing City, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Pham, Q.-V.; Ba, P.; Deepa, N.; Dev, K. Industry 5.0: A Survey on Enabling Technologies and Potential Applications. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2021, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAP. Industry 5.0: Adding the Human Edge to Industry 4.0. Available online: https://www.sap.com/insights/industry-5-0.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Zhdaneev, O.; Chuboksarov, V. Prospects for Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia. Energy Policy 2020, 7, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carayannis, E.G.; Draper, J.; Bhaneja, B. Towards Fusion Energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 Context: Call for a Global Commission for Urgent Action on Fusion Energy. J. Knowl. Econ. 2021, 12, 1891–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeb, S.; Mahmood, A.; Khowaja, S.A.; Dev, K.; Hassan, S.A.; Qureshi, F.N.M.; Gidlund, M.; Bellavista, P. Industry 5.0 is Coming: A Survey on Intelligent NextG Wireless Networks as Technological Enablers. arXiv 2022, 2205, 09084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zizic, M.C.; Mladineo, M.; Gjeldum, N.; Celent, L. From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology. Energies 2022, 15, 5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrahamsson, L.; Johansson, B.; Johansson, J. Future of metal mining: Sixteen predictions. Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng. 2009, 1, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrasco, Y. Mining 4.0: A Digital Transformation Approach to Mining Sector. In Proceedings of the Conference “Technology Management and Leadership in Digital Transformation–Looking Ahead to Post-COVID Era”, Portland, OR, USA, 7–11 August 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Faz-Mendoza, A.; Gamboa-Rosales, N.K.; Medina-Rodriguez, C.E.; Casas-Valadez, M.A.; Castorena-Robles, A.; Lopez-Robles, J.R. Intelligent processes in the context of Mining 4.0: Trends; research challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, Bahrain, 8–9 November 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; p. 9317095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertayeva, K.; Panaedova, G.; Natocheeva, N.; Kulagovskaya, T.; Belyanchikova, T. Industry 4.0 in the mining industry: Global trends and innovative development. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 135, 04026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carrasco, Y. Technology and Innovation Management in Open-Pit Peruvian Mining: Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference for Management of Technology (IAMOT 2019). National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, India, 8–10 April 2019; pp. 136–141. [Google Scholar]
- Loow, J.; Abrahamsson, L.; Johansson, J. Mining 4.0–the Impact of New Technology from a Work Place Perspective. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019, 36, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, K.; Sepasgozar, S. Governance, Standards and Regulation: What Construction and Mining Need to Commit to Industry 4.0. Buildings 2022, 12, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, J.; Choi, Y. A New GIS-Based Algorithm to Support Initial Transmitter Layout Design in Open-Pit Mines. Energies 2018, 11, 3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossein, M.N.; Mohammadrezaei, M.; Hunt, J.; Zakeri, B. Internet of Things (IoT) and the Energy Sector. Energies 2020, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Joseph, A.; Balachandra, P. Energy Internet, the Future Electricity System: Overview, Concept, Model Structure and Mechanism. Energies 2020, 13, 4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Jung, D.; Nguyen, H.; Choi, Y. Diagnosis of Problems in Truck Ore Transport Operations in Underground Mines Using Various Machine Learning Models and Data Collected by Internet of Things Systems. Minerals 2021, 11, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Challenge of Industry 4.0 and the Demand for New Answers; IndustriALL Head Office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; 36p.
- BPM InfoSys. IoT in Mining. Available online: https://www.infosysbpm.com/blogs/sourcing-procurement/iot-in-mining.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Vitor, R.F. Enabling Digital Twins in Industry 4.0. Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process. 2022, 455, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cogswell, D.; Paramatmuni, C.; Scotti, L.; Moffat, J. Guidance for Materials 4.0 to interact with a digital twin. Data-Centric Eng. 2022, 3, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAP SE. The Intelligent Enterprise for the Mining Industry Making Mining More Agile and Sustainable from the Pit to the Customer. August 2022. Available online: https://www.sap.com/documents/2017/11/3eb0f65b-dd7c-0010-82c7-eda71af511fa.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Build a Digital Twin with Process Mining. Use Digital Twin Models to Improve Your Decision-Making. Available online: https://apromore.com/build-a-digital-twin-model-with-process-mining/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Huang, A.; Huo, Y.; Yang, J.; Gu, H.; Li, G. Computational Modeling and Prediction on Viscosity of Slags by Big Data Mining. Minerals 2020, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tyleckova, E.; Noskievicova, D. The role of big data in Industry 4.0 in mining industry in Serbia. CzOTO 2020, 2, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, M.; Huang, Q.; Xu, R.; Wang, C.; Xu, J. Optimization of Shearer Drum Based on Multi-Objective Bat Algorithm with Grid (MOBA/G). Machines 2022, 10, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Chen, J.; Liu, C. Overview on the Development of Intelligent Methods for Mineral Resource Prediction under the Background of Geological Big Data. Minerals 2022, 12, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Qin, T. Construction of Conceptual Prospecting Model Based on Geological Big Data: A Case Study in Songtao-Huayuan Area, Hunan Province. Minerals 2022, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stupar, D.I.; Ogrizovic, V.; Roser, J.; Vizintin, G. Analytical and Numerical Solution for Better Positioning in Mines with Potential Extending Application in Space Mining. Minerals 2022, 12, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullo, S.L.; Sinha, G.R. Advances in Smart Environment Monitoring Systems Using IoT and Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurdziak, L.P.; Błazej, R.; Bajda, M. Conveyor Belt 4.0. In Book: Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance; Kacprzyk, J., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabek, P.; Szrek, J.; Zimroz, R.; Wodecki, J. An Automatic Procedure for Overheated Idler Detection in Belt Conveyors Using Fusion of Infrared and RGB Images Acquired during UGV Robot Inspection. Energies 2022, 15, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Gao, K.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, C. Efficient Graphical Algorithm of Sensor Distribution and Air Volume Reconstruction for a Smart Mine Ventilation Network. Sensors 2022, 22, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zietek, B.; Banasiewicz, A.; Zimroz, R.; Szrek, J.; Gola, S. A Portable Environmental Data-Monitoring System for Air Hazard Evaluation in Deep Underground Mines. Energies 2020, 13, 6331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Gao, X.; Yang, J.; Deng, K.; Yu, Y. Monitoring Mining Subsidence Using A Combination of Phase-Stacking and Offset-Tracking Methods. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 9166–9183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ilieva, M.; Polanin, P.; Borkowski, A.; Gruchlik, P.; Smolak, K.; Kowalski, A.; Rohm, W. Mining Deformation Life Cycle in the Light of InSAR and Deformation Models. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, S.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, D.; Xia, Y. Goaf Locating Based on InSAR and Probability Integration Method. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, S.; Mallorqui, J.J.; Fan, H.; Zheng, M. Improving PSI Processing of Mining Induced Large Deformations with External Models. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabrys, M.; Ortyl, L. Georeferencing of Multi-Channel GPR–Accuracy and Efficiency of Mapping of Underground Utility Networks. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozmus, M.; Tokarczyk, J.; Michalak, D.; Dudek, M.; Szewerda, K.; Rotkegel, M.; Lamot, A.; Roser, J. Application of 3D Scanning; Computer Simulations and Virtual Reality in the Redesigning Process of Selected Areas of Underground Transportation Routes in Coal Mining Industry. Energies 2021, 14, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janus, J.; Ostrogorski, P. Underground Mine Tunnel Modelling Using Laser Scan Data in Relation to Manual Geometry Measurements. Energies 2022, 15, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martelet, G.; Gloaguen, E.; Dossing, A.; Lima Simoes da Silva, E.; Linde, J.; Rasmussen, T.M. Airborne/UAV Multisensor Surveys Enhance the Geological Mapping and 3D Model of a Pseudo-Skarn Deposit in Ploumanach, French Brittany. Minerals 2021, 11, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhao, H.; Bi, L.; Wang, L. Implicit 3D Modeling of Ore Body from Geological Boreholes Data Using Hermite Radial Basis Functions. Minerals 2018, 8, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Čebašek, V.; Rupar, V.; Đenadić, S.; Miletić, F. Cutting Resistance Laboratory Testing Methodology for Underwater Coal Mining. Minerals 2021, 11, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Hong, S.; Oh, J.-W.; Bae, D.-S. Simulation Technology Development for Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical System in Deep-Seabed Integrated Mining System Using Multibody Dynamics. Minerals 2022, 12, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, J.P.; Eger, T.R.; Frayne, R.J.; Delgado, G.P.; Ji, X. Research Using Virtual Reality: Mobile Machinery Safety in the 21st Century. Minerals 2013, 3, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Borowski, P.F. Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yao, F.; Wen, F. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Modern Power Systems: A Brief Survey. Energies 2022, 15, 4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pincheira, M.; Antonini, M.; Vecchio, M. Integrating the IoT and Blockchain Technology for the Next Generation of Mining Inspection Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Fan, J.; Yan, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. A Gas Concentration Prediction Method Driven by a Spark Streaming Framework. Energies 2022, 15, 5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crespo Marquez, A.; de la Fuente Carmona, A.; Antomarioni, S. A Process to Implement an Artificial Neural Network and Association Rules Techniques to Improve Asset Performance and Energy Efficiency. Energies 2019, 12, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Polo, F.A.O.; Bermejo, J.F.; Fernandez, J.F.G.; Marquez, A.C. Failure mode prediction and energy forecasting of PV plants to assist dynamic maintenance tasks by ANN based models. Renew. Energy 2015, 81, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, D.; Paithanka, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Equeenuddin, S.M. Integrated Parametric Graph Closure and Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Open Pit Mine Scheduling under Uncertainty. Mining 2022, 2, 32–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, R.; Mercier, P.H.J.; Navarra, A. Integrated Artificial Neural Network and Discrete Event Simulation Framework for Regional Development of Refractory Gold Systems. Mining 2022, 2, 123–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Jiang, K.; Shi, H.; Yu, Y.; Hao, N. Application of Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Damage Detection of Conveyor Belt. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senjoba, L.; Sasaki, J.; Kosugi, Y.; Toriya, H.; Hisada, M.; Kawamura, Y. One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Drill Bit Failure Detection in Rotary Percussion Drilling. Mining 2021, 1, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodny, J.; Tutak, M. The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Analyze Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions from the Mining and Quarrying Sector in the European Union. Energies 2020, 13, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meng, X.; Chang, H.; Wang, X. Methane Concentration Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Classical Time Series Analysis. Energies 2022, 15, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Yan, B.; Zhang, Q. Automatic Events Recognition in Low SNR Microseismic Signals of Coal Mine Based on Wavelet Scattering Transform and SVM. Energies 2022, 15, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Zhu, J.; He, M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Li, D.; Kang, L.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Wan, X. Research on Intelligent Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal Seam Impact Risk Based on BP Neural Network Model. Energies 2022, 15, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmoutti, M.; Hodgkinson, J.; Dean, P. Prediction of Mining Conditions in Geotechnically Complex Sites. Mining 2021, 1, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Bakr, A.Y.; Sazid, M. Application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Prediction and Optimization of Blast-Induced Impacts. Mining 2021, 1, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubinkin, D.; Sadovets, V.; Syrkin, I.; Chicherin, I. Assessment of the Need to Create Control Sytem of Unmanned Dump Truck. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 177, 03022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Singh, D.; Bhamu, J. Machine Vision in Industry 4.0: Applications; Challenges and Future Directions. In Machine Vision for Industry 4.0. Applications and Case Studies; Raut, R., Krit, S., Chatterje, P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odeyar, P.; Apel, D.B.; Hall, R.; Zon, B.; Skrzypkowski, K. A Review of Reliability and Fault Analysis Methods for Heavy Equipment and Their Components Used in Mining. Energies 2022, 15, 6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gackowiec, P.; Brzychczy, E.; Kesek, M. Enhancement of Machinery Activity Recognition in a Mining Environment with GPS Data. Energies 2021, 14, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Chang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, W. PCViT: A Pre-Convolutional ViT Coal Gangue Identification Method. Energies 2022, 15, 4189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, G.; Liu, H.; Ren, K.; Deng, B.; Xue, J. Automatic Recognition Based on Convolutional Neural Network. Energies 2022, 15, 3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chomacki, L.; Rusek, J.; Słowik, L. Machine Learning Methods in Damage Prediction of Masonry Development Exposed to the Industrial Environment of Mines. Energies 2022, 15, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateo, F.W.; Redchuk, A.; Tornillo, J.E. Industry 5.0 and new business models in mining. Adoption Case of Machine Learning to optimize the process at a copper Semi Autogenous Grinding (SAG) Mill. In Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, 26–28 July 2022. [Google Scholar]
- International Energy Agency Report. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy System. 2021. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/IEA%2C%20Net%20Zero%20by%202050.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Tsotsos, H. Energy 5.0: How Digital Transformation in the Energy Sector will Affect Future Manufacturing, Environment and Societies. Industry 4.0. 10 August 2022. Available online: https://industry4o.com/2022/08/10/energy-5-0/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Adel, A. Future of industry 5.0 in society: Human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. J. Cloud Comput. 2022, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massaro, A. Advanced Control Systems in Industry 5.0 Enabling Process Mining. Sensors 2022, 22, 8677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. Industry 4.0 and Energy 4.0 for Southeast Asia. The Diplomat. 21 May 2015. Available online: https://thediplomat.com/2015/05/industry-4-0-and-energy-4-0-for-southeast-asia/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Babkin, A.V.; Koryagin, S.I.; Liberman, I.V.; Klachek, P.M.; Bogdanova, A.A.; Saghatelyan, N.H. Industry 5.0: A Neuro-Digital Tool for Strategic Goal-Setting and Planning. Tech. Technol. Probl. Serv. 2022, 3, 64–85. Available online: https://sciup.org/industrija-50nejro-cifrovoj-instrumentarij-strategicheskogo-celepolaganija-i-148324959 (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Jimenez-Paredes, A.E.; Alfaro-Saldana, E.F.; Hernandez-Sanchez, A.; Garcia-Meza, J.V. An Autochthonous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Metapopulation Exploited for Two-Step Pyrite Biooxidation Improves Au/Ag Particle Release from Mining Waste. Mining 2021, 1, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaselimi, M.; Protopapadakis, E.; Voulodimos, A.; Doulamis, N.; Doulamis, A. Towards Trustworthy Energy Disaggregation: A Review of Challenges, Methods, and Perspectives for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring. Sensors 2022, 22, 5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Industry 4.0 Opportunities behind the Challenge. In Proceedings of the Background Paper of UNIDO General Conference 17 “Partnering for Impact” Achieving the SDGS, Vienna, Austria, 27 November–1 December 2017; Available online: https://sdg.iisd.org/news/unido-conference-focuses-on-partnerships-for-achieving-isid-gender-equality/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Lang, M. From Industry 4.0 to Energy 4.0: Future Business Models and Legal Relations; Conference Report of Digitalisierung in der Energiewirtschaft XX; Jahrestagung Institut für Berg- und Energierecht: Bochum, Germany, 17 March 2016; Available online: http://wise.co.th/wise/References/Creative_Economy/From_Industry_4_to_Energy_4.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Dwyer, B.; Bassa, J. Combining IoT, Industry 4.0, and Energy Management Suggests Exciting Future in Tech Logo. ISA’s Flagship Publications. March/April 2018. Available online: https://www.isa.org/intech-home/2018/march-april/features/combining-iot-industry-4-0-and-energy-management (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Digital Transformation in Energy Industry–Energy 4.0. Powertech Review. 27 January 2020. Available online: https://powertechreview.com/digital-transformation-in-energy-industry-energy-4-0/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- He, X.; Zhao, K.; Chu, X. A survey of the state-of-the-art. Knowl. Based Syst. 2021, 2012, 106622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, W.M.; Uddin, G.M.; Farooq, M.; Riaz, F.; Ahmad, H.A.; Kamal, A.H.; Anwar, S.; El-Sherbeeny, A.M.; Khan, M.H.; Hafeez, N.; et al. Construction of Operational Data-Driven Power Curve of a Generator by Industry 4.0 Data Analytics. Energies 2021, 14, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez-Abreu, A.-D.; Delgado-Prieto, M.; Osornio-Rios, R.-A.; Saucedo-Dorantes, J.-J.; Romero-Troncoso, R.-d.-J. A Novel Deep Learning-Based Diagnosis Method Applied to Power Quality Disturbances. Energies 2021, 14, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddouche, M.; Ilinca, A. Energy Efficiency and Industry 4.0 in Wood Industry: A Review and Comparison to Other Industries. Energies 2022, 15, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teba, C. Energy 4.0: How Digital Evolution is Shaping the Future of Electricity. Energy Intelligence. 29 January 2021. Available online: https://www.dexma.com/blog-en/energy-4-0-how-digital-revolution-is-shaping-the-future-of-electricity/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Nota, G.; Nota, F.D.; Peluso, D.; Toro Lazo, A. Energy Efficiency in Industry 4.0: The Case of Batch Production Processes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, B. How Industry 4.0 Can Impact Energy. Solar Magazine. 14 March 2023. Available online: https://solarmagazine.com/how-industry-4-0-can-impact-energy/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Industry 4.0 in the energy sector. Biznes Alert. 24 July 2019. Available online: https://biznesalert.com/industry-4-0-in-the-energy-sector/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Borowski, P.F. Innovative Processes in Managing an Enterprise from the Energy and Food Sector in the Era of Industry 4.0. Processes 2021, 9, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.; Ghobakhloo, M. Energy sustainability and industry 4.0. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 463, 012090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konchalovic, D.; Nikolic, J.; Djokic, A.; Momcilovic, P.; Zivkovic, D. Energy Cooperatives and a Just Transition in Southeast Europe. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2023, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonida, C. 5G: Connecting Mining to Industry 4.0. The Intelligent Miner. 25 January 2019. Available online: https://theintelligentminer.com/2019/01/25/5g-connecting-mining-to-industry-4-0/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Silva, T.H.H.; Sehnem, S. Industry 4.0 and the Circular Economy: Integration Opportunities Generated by Startups. Logistics 2022, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhironkin, S.; Ezdina, N. Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to Mining 5.0 Innovative Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahavandi, S. Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abu-Abed, F.N. Application of intelligent management technologies and business design of industry 5.0 in mining 5.0. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 3, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kagan, E.S.; Goosen, E.V.; Pakhomova, E.O.; Goosen, O.K. Industry 4.0 and an upgrade of the business models of large mining companies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 823, 012057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benndorf, J.; Restrepo, D.A.; Merkel, N.; John, A.; Buxton, M.; Guatame-Garcia, A.; Dalm, M.; de Waard, B.; Flores, H.; Möllerherm, S.; et al. TRIM4Post-Mining: Transition Information Modelling for Attractive Post-Mining Landscapes—A Conceptual Framework. Mining 2022, 2, 248–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seminario-Córdova, R.; Rojas-Ortega, R. Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Production: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Last Five Years. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buryakovskaya, O.A.; Ambaryan, G.N.; Tarasenko, A.B.; Suleimanov, M.Z.; Vlaskin, M.S. Effects of Bi–Sn–Pb Alloy and Ball-Milling Duration on the Reactivity of Magnesium–Aluminum Waste-Based Materials for Hydrogen Production. Materials 2023, 16, 4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OER International. Industry 5.0: The Hydrogen Revolution? 4 January 2021. Available online: https://ocean-energyresources.com/industry-5-0-the-hydrogen-revolution/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Corbyn, B. This Time is Different: The Resurgence of Clean Tech VC Funding. Fortune. 29 September 2021. Available online: https://fortune.com/2021/09/28/this-time-is-different-the-resurgence-of-cleantech-vc-funding/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Bi, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y. A New Reform of Mining Production and Management Modes under Industry 4.0: Cloud Mining Mode. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gackowiec, P.; Podobinska-Staniec, M.; Brzychczy, E.; Kuhlbach, C.; Ozver, T. Review of Key Performance Indicators for Process Monitoring in the Mining Industry. Energies 2020, 13, 5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clausen, E.; Sorensen, A.; Uth, F.; Mitra, R. Assessment of the Effects of Global Digitalization Trends on Sustainability in Mining; Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources: Hannover, Germany, 2020; 69p. [Google Scholar]
- González-Ruiz, J.D.; Mejia-Escobar, J.C.; Franco-Sepúlveda, G. Towards an Understanding of Project Finance in the Mining Sector in the Sustainability Context: A Scientometric Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Elements | Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (USA) | Industry 4.0 (Germany) | National Technology Initiative (Russia) | Society 5.0 (Japan) | Made in China 2025 | IKTVA (Saudi Arabia) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goal | Expansion of high-performance jobs in the USA | German leadership in the development and implementation of cyber-physical systems by 2020 both at home and abroad | To form fundamentally new markets and create conditions for the global technological leadership of Russia by 2035 | Solving the problems of population decline, childlessness of working citizens | Harmonization of technology and industry; restructuring of the industrial sector | Reforming all industries in order to develop alternative energy sources |
National key technologies | Additive technologies, digital manufacturing and design, power and flexible hybrid electronics, integrated photonics | Industrial Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems, service robotics, smart factories | Nine Markets of the Future (AeroNet, AutoNet, Neuronet, Energynet, Health-Net, SafeNet, MariNet, Food-Net, FinNet) | Socio-economic and cultural system based on advanced digital technologies | Advanced robotics, aerospace, high-tech marine and railway technology | Cyber-physical systems in oil production, environmental and industrial waste |
Organization | Interdepartmental and intersectoral initiative | One of the 10 “future projects” under the High-Tech Strategy 2020 Action Plan | An independent interdepartmental cross-industry initiative that connects business and society | Intersectoral social initiative | Interdepartmental and intersectoral initiative | Intersectoral initiative |
State participants | Industry ministries, NASA, National Science Foundation (NSF) | Ministry of Education and Research, Ministry of Economy and Technology | Presidential Council for Modernization of the Economy and Innovative Development, line ministries | Japan Big Business Federation “Keidanren” | State Council of the People’s Republic of China | Saudi Aramco, Government of Saudi Arabia |
Other participants | Universities, national laboratories, professional associations | National Academy of Engineering Sciences, Association of IT companies, machine builders, electronics manufacturers | Agency for Strategic Initiatives, Russian Venture Company | Large, medium and small enterprises | Large, medium and small enterprises | Large, medium and small enterprises |
2011 | 2011 | 2014 | 2016 | 2015 | 2017 |
The Steps of Industrial Development | Results | Technological Innovations | The Steps of Geotechnology Development | Core Innovations in Fossil Fuels Extraction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Industry 1.0 | First pieces of equipment with high specific capacity | Steel, coke and first machines production | Mining 1.0 | Replacement of humans with machines in auxiliary and support processes |
Industry 2.0 | Electric drive machines | Electric power, strong alloys, conveyors, petrochemistry, automobiles | Mining 2.0 | Replacement of humans with machines in the main processes |
Industry 3.0 | Robotization of individual processes | Automation, analog computing and control systems | Mining 3.0 | High specific productivity equipment, analog telemetry |
Industry 4.0 | Limited replacing of humans with artificial intelligence | Deep digitalization, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, convergent technologies | Mining 4.0 | Unmanned technologies, remote process control, digital simulation |
Industry 5.0 | Machine-–Human Synergy | Data mining, Internet of Everything, artificial intelligence as a main means of production, cyber-physical systems, collaborative robots, omnipresent augmented reality | Mining 5.0 | Using collaborative robots in mines and quarries, equipment control and processes management with blockchain, digital twins, machine learning, ESG and post-mining |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhironkin, S.; Dotsenko, E. Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production. Energies 2023, 16, 5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155794
Zhironkin S, Dotsenko E. Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production. Energies. 2023; 16(15):5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155794
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhironkin, Sergey, and Elena Dotsenko. 2023. "Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production" Energies 16, no. 15: 5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155794
APA StyleZhironkin, S., & Dotsenko, E. (2023). Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production. Energies, 16(15), 5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155794