Next Article in Journal
Energy Resilience in Presence of Natural and Social Uncertainties
Previous Article in Journal
Cleaner Potential for Natural Rubber Drying Process Using Microwave Technology Powered by Solar Energy
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Solar Energy Powered Seawater Desalination Processes: A Review

Energies 2022, 15(18), 6562; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186562
by Mudhar A. Al-Obaidi 1, Rana H. A. Zubo 2, Farhan Lafta Rashid 3, Hassan J. Dakkama 4, Raed Abd-Alhameed 5,6,* and Iqbal M. Mujtaba 7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Energies 2022, 15(18), 6562; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186562
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 4 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 September 2022 / Published: 8 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper discussed three different seawater desalination processes, multistage flash, multi-effect distillation, and reverse osmosis. Also, the authors evaluated combining concentrated solar power or photovoltaic to the aforementioned three technologies. The conclusion is a solar-powered system can not only reduce carbon footprint significantly but also have some economic advantages.

1. In the abstract, is it appropriate to claim solar energy is a supplier of unlimited energy?

2. In figure 1, don't use abbreviations.

3. Is it possible to re-draw figure 4 to match the style of figures 2 and 3? The scaling of the figure is off.

4. Add a table to summarize the advantages/disadvantages of three desalination systems

5. The discussion below line 424 lacks logic. 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attached response.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This article discusses a fascinating topic, mainly desalination, combined with renewable energy systems, but I still have some suggestions.

1. There are typos in this manuscript. It is suggested that the spelling and symbols should be re-checked in this manuscript.

2. There mark is an error in Figure 2. Please correct it.

3. Figure 4 has abbreviations that need to be added to explain (such as TK-100, P-100, VFD…).

 4. This manuscript is a review, but most references are described in the text, and figures should be added. Authors can refer to the following article format to modify.

 

Nabil Karamia; Nazih Moubayedb; Rachid Outbibc. General review and classification of different MPPT Techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 68, Part 1, February 2017, Pages 1-18.

Author Response

Please see the attached response.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form

Author Response

Please see the attached. 

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The bottom lines are to be deleted from Lines 165, 189, 206, 295, and 315.

2. Figure 2 shows the  T=112C is T=112 degrees?

3. Line 415 has a typo.

Author Response

Please see the attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop