Next Article in Journal
Prony Method Estimation for Motor Current Signal Analysis Diagnostics in Rotor Cage Induction Motors
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Uncertainties on Crude Oil Prices: Based on a Quantile-on-Quantile Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Life Cycle Assessment and Energy Balance of a Polygeneration Plant Fed with Lignocellulosic Biomass of Cynara cardunculus L.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
2
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(10), 3511; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103511
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 10 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Thinking for a Sustainable Built Environment)
Life Cycle Assessment is widely utilized to investigate the influences on global greenhouse gas emissions of various humankind activities and products [1,2]. Alongside this, Life Cycle Assessment-related methodologies exist such as Life Cycle Cost [3] and Social Life Cycle Assessment [4] which enable to holistically approach the analysis with specific focuses on the economic and social aspects, respectively. It is, therefore, necessary to establish a Life Cycle Thinking approach, particularly for the building sector, to deepen the understanding of the potential environmental, economic, and social impacts of construction materials and technologies, systems, and plants for energy production from renewable energy source. Within this framework, the Zero Emissions Building [5] and Zero Emissions Neighborhood [6] concepts, which, respectively, refer to carbon neutral buildings and districts, were outlined.
This book contains the successful invited submissions [7,8,9,10,11,12,13] to the Special Issue of Energies (ISSN 1996–1073) on the subject area of “Life Cycle Thinking for a Sustainable Built Environment” in the section “Energy and Buildings”. This Special Issue bring together current progress on Life Cycle Assessment which enables a better knowledge of the impacts of the building sector, but also a greater robustness of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology and the identification of low-carbon solutions.
Original research article and comprehensive reviews along with well documented case studies have been collected in this Special Issue. These works present both numerical and experimental investigations which focus on multiple aspects of the building design, ranging from the development of innovative and environmentally friendly materials to the implementation of highly effective plants for power and heat supply. Furthermore, methods to minimize carbon emissions from buildings since the early stages of the design process were presented, while a review article on the same topic highlights the state-of-art and outlines future research trends in this field.
As can be seen from the titles of the research articles, “Life Cycle Thinking” consists of a way of interpreting the built environment as a unicum in which the different elements are inter-connected, and they influence each other. In fact, design strategies and technology solutions which are applied throughout the building lifetime were demonstrated to influence several factors such as human health, carbon footprint, user comfort, and energy demand.
New research trends identified in this Special Issue encourage continued discussion about the strategies and solutions to design a sustainable built environment through Life Cycle Thinking-based approaches. The common objective must be the reduction in impacts of the building sector while maintaining adequate living standards.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Azzi, E.S.; Karltun, E.; Sundberg, C. Life Cycle Assessment of Urban Uses of Biochar and Case Study in Uppsala, Sweden. Biochar 2022, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mangmeechai, A. The Life-Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Life-Cycle Costs of e-Waste Management in Thailand. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2022, 32, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Perčić, M.; Frković, L.; Pukšec, T.; Ćosić, B.; Li, O.L.; Vladimir, N. Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Assessment of Power Batteries for All-Electric Vessels for Short-Sea Navigation. Energy 2022, 251, 123895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bonilla-Alicea, R.J.; Fu, K. Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of Residential Rooftop Solar Panels Using Challenge-Derived Framework. Energy. Sustain. Soc. 2022, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shirinbakhsh, M.; Harvey, L.D.D. Net-Zero Energy Buildings: The Influence of Definition on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Energy Build. 2021, 247, 111118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brozovsky, J.; Gustavsen, A.; Gaitani, N. Zero Emission Neighbourhoods and Positive Energy Districts–A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 72, 103013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barros Lovate Temporim, R.; Cavalaglio, G.; Petrozzi, A.; Coccia, V.; Iodice, P.; Nicolini, A.; Cotana, F. Life Cycle Assessment and Energy Balance of a Polygeneration Plant Fed with Lignocellulosic Biomass of Cynara cardunculus L. Energies 2022, 15, 2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ntouros, V.; Kousis, I.; Papadaki, D.; Pisello, A.L.; Assimakopoulos, M.N. Life Cycle Assessment on Different Synthetic Routes of ZIF-8 Nanomaterials. Energies 2021, 14, 4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manni, M.; de Albuquerque Landi, F.; Giannoni, T.; Petrozzi, A.; Nicolini, A.; Cotana, F. A Comparative Study on Opto-Thermal Properties of Natural Clay Bricks Incorporating Dredged Sediments. Energies 2021, 14, 4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manni, M.; Lobaccaro, G.; Lolli, N.; Bohne, R.A. Parametric Design to Maximize Solar Irradiation and Minimize the Embodied GHG Emissions for a ZEB in Nordic and Mediterranean Climate Zones. Energies 2020, 13, 4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Manni, M.; Nicolini, A. Multi-Objective Optimization Models to Design a Responsive Built Environment: A Synthetic Review. Energies 2022, 15, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Płoszaj-Mazurek, M.; Ryńska, E.; Grochulska-Salak, M. Methods to Optimize Carbon Footprint of Buildings in Regenerative Architectural Design with the Use of Machine Learning, Convolutional Neural Network, and Parametric Design. Energies 2020, 13, 5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Piontek, M.; Łuszczyńska, K. Testing the Toxicity of Stachybotrys Chartarum in Indoor Environments—A Case Study. Energies 2021, 14, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manni, M.; Cotana, F. Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment. Energies 2022, 15, 3511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103511

AMA Style

Manni M, Cotana F. Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment. Energies. 2022; 15(10):3511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manni, Mattia, and Franco Cotana. 2022. "Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment" Energies 15, no. 10: 3511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop