Next Article in Journal
Demand-Side Management for Improvement of the Power Quality in Smart Homes Using Non-Intrusive Identification of Appliance Usage Patterns with the True Power Factor
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient and Stable Perovskite Large Area Cells by Low-Cost Fluorene-Xantene-Based Hole Transporting Layer
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Daily Cost of Reactive Power Procurement by Smart Inverters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dopant-Free All-Organic Small-Molecule HTMs for Perovskite Solar Cells: Concepts and Structure–Property Relationships
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Passivation Strategies through Surface Reconstruction toward Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells on n-i-p Architecture

1
Laboratory of Photomolecular Science, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Ångström Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Uppsala University, Box 523, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(16), 4836; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164836
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Revised: 6 August 2021 / Accepted: 6 August 2021 / Published: 8 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology)

Abstract

:
Perovskite solar cells have achieved remarkable enhancement in their performance in recent years. However, to get an entrance to the photovoltaic market, great effort is still necessary to further improve their efficiency as well as their long-term stability under various conditions. Among various types of approaches (including compositional engineering, dopant engineering, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), et al.), interfacial engineering through passivation treatment has been considered as one of the most effective strategies to reduce the non-radiative recombination within the PSCs. Thus, this short review summaries recent efforts on chemical interfacial passivation strategies from a different perspective owing to their common phenomena of reconstructing the perovskite surface via the formation of three-dimensional perovskite, low-dimensional perovskite and synergistic effect provided by a mixed-salt passivation system, respectively.

1. Introduction

Solar cells based on organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite structured materials have attracted tremendous attention in recent years, in which both efficiency and stability have been dramatically enhanced. In particular, the state-of-the-art record efficiency has reached 25.5% with n-i-p architecture [1,2,3,4], which is comparable with the well-established crystalline silicon based solar cells (with efficiencies around 26%) and better performance than the thin-film based solar cells (with power conversion efficiency (PCE) around 23% as indicated in National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) efficiency chart), making perovskite solar cell (PSC) a promising candidate in the PV market. However, there are still many defect trap states and charge transport barriers presented at the grain boundaries, bulk and interfaces within the PSCs, which not only hinders the further improvement in PCE towards its theoretical limit but also affects the stability of the devices, especially under exposure to moisture, oxygen, heating and light illumination [5,6]. Therefore, to address such issues, extensive work has been conducted on investigating various materials as well as device engineering.
Passivation is considered to be one of the most powerful approaches to enhance the device performance and long-term stability, mainly by improving charge carrier extraction and suppressing defect trap states [7,8,9]. It refers to a material becoming “passivate”, according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). Thus, passivation layers normally act as shielding layers to protect the active semiconductor surface from being affected or corroded by the surrounding environment. For PSCs, the passivation layer aims at either reducing the defect trap states at the grains and grain boundaries through chemical passivation or isolating adjacent functional interlayers through physical passivation to protect in order to avoid device degradation from exposing to the external environment, thus leading to an enhanced long-term stability. So far, a large amount of literature has been dedicated to summarizing various passivation materials and their effect in PSCs [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, this perspective, on the other hand, provides a different way of clarifying the chemical passivation effect through surface reconstruction, which is one of the most effective approaches to reduce the surface defects of the perovskite as well as the interface between perovskite and the hole-transporting layer (HTL) via the formation of a three-dimensional, low-dimensional interlayer, as well as the synergistic effect provided by a mixed-salt passivation system.

2. Surface Reconstruction with Formation of Three-Dimensional Perovskite Interlayer

Excess lead-iodide (PbI2) has been widely used as a passivation additive in perovskite films for high performance PSCs. In 2014, Yang and co-workers reported a self-induced passivation technique with the proper amount of PbI2 in the perovskite film of CH3NH3PbI3, which effectively improves its carrier behavior owing to the suppressed recombination at the grain boundaries (GBs) and adjacent interface with TiO2 (as illustrated in Figure 1), leading to a pronounced enhancement in device performance [12]. Self-induced passivation with excess/unreacted PbI2 has been investigated as a common strategy in improving device performance of PSCs by the other works, since PbI2 will help to reduce halide vacancies and passivate the defects in perovskite GBs [13,14]. However, the presence of unreacted PbI2 results in an intrinsic instability of the perovskite film, especially under continuous light illumination, which accelerates the formation of decomposition produces of lead and iodine in the perovskite films [15]. The degradation mechanism and detrimental effect under long-term stability has been recently further investigated by Tumen–Ulzii and co-workers [16].
As discussed above, a series of studies have proven that unreacted PbI2 in the perovskite films can bring a positive effect on device performance, while PbI2 crystals is one of the reasons for accelerating the degradation of PSCs. Therefore, many efforts have focused on surface reconstruction with formation of an additional perovskite layer through reactions with the excess of PbI2 from the pristine perovskite layer for further improvement in device performance as well as long-term stability. For example, Cho and co-workers introduced an interfacial passivating modifier of formamidinium bromide (FABr), which constructs an additional FAPbBr3-x-IIx layer via reaction with excess PbI2 on top of the primary (FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15 film [17]. Such post-treatment resulted in a perovskite surface reconstruction towards a denser and more homogenous film, as compared to the as-prepared perovskite film, which is indicated in the high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) (as shown in Figure 2). Consequently, the reconstructed FAPbBr3-x-IIx layer also acted as an electron blocking layer, leading to an improved PCE. However, the shelf-stability of the passivated device is similar to that of the control device. Other self-induced passivation agents, such as methylammonium bromide (MABr), have also been investigated to improve the perovskite film morphology after post-treatment of the perovskite film, which will passivate the surface defects and further improve the PCEs of the target devices [18]. MABr is also developed to treat as-prepared FAPbI3 film, which helps to increase the perovskite crystallinity as well as to optimize its absorption edge [19].

3. Surface Reconstruction with Formation of Low-Dimensional Perovskite Interlayer

Low-dimensional perovskites exhibit better environmental stability and photostability compared with their three-dimensional (3D) counterparts, but owing to its poor charge transport and wide bandgaps, perovskite PSCs based on low-D structure show relatively low efficiency [20]. Therefore, efforts have been focused on the structure of low-D/3D perovskite through interfacial engineering on the 3D-based perovskite with large size organic cation spacers. The newly formed low-D perovskite interlayer can help to further improve the performance of PSCs. Meanwhile, they also exhibit excellent long-term stability under various conditions. For example, Soek’s group demonstrated a systematic interfacial study on the effect of different alkyl chain length of ammonium iodide (butylammonium iodide (BAI), octylammonium iodide (OAI), and dodecylammonium iodide (DAI)) with the formation of a 2D perovskite on the top of 3D layer [21]. They realized that the chain’s electron-blocking ability and humidity resistance increase dramatically as the alkyl chain length increases. Consequently, the PSC treated with OAI has achieved a certified stabilized PCE of 22.9% and enhanced long-term stability under high humidity, with a relative humidity of 85%. Yoo et al. deposited a novel precursor/solvent combination (alkyl ammonium bromides/chloroform) on top of the 3D perovskite layer for the synthesis of the 2D layer. Such treatment resulted in a less faceted and distinctive grain surface and boundaries compare to the pristine 3D perovskite, leading to a certified stabilized PCE of 22.6% with the longest chain length for ammonium bromides [22]. Liu et al. employed pentafluoro-phenylethylammonium iodide (FEAI) on the surface 3D perovskite. The introduction of an F-rich 2D layer not only exhibited outstanding humid stability, but also achieved the perovskite solar cells with over 22% efficiency [23]. Except the 2D/3D PSCs, Chen’s group developed an in situ cross-linking polymerizable propargylammonium on the top of 3D absorption perovskite surfaces [24]. The new formed 1D/3D perovskite heterostructure could efficiently enhance the device performance and stability of PSCs. They evaluated the ISOS-D-1 stability of the unencapsulated solar cells under ambient condition with a humidity of 40–70% for 1500 h. The target devices retained 97% of their initial performance, whereas the control cell dropped to 43%. Moreover, after maximum power point tracking for more than 3000 h under continuous illumination, the passivated devices still retained 93% of their initial efficiency. More ammonium salts, such as butylammonium iodide (BAI), phenethylammonium iodide (PEAI), along with other types of molecules have also been reported to form low-D perovskite layers at the interface between perovskite and HTL, which present better PCEs by reducing the defects, suppressing the non-radiative recombination, and filling iodine vacancies of both the surfaces and GBs of perovskite films. Alongside this, the strategies show outstanding improvement in long-term stability, especially under a humid atmosphere [25,26].

4. Surface Reconstruction with Mixed-Salt Passivation through Synergistic Effect

As mentioned above, tremendous efforts have been made on designing functional molecules for interfacial treatment between perovskite and HTL. With the exception of the signal salt that was used to passivate the perovskite films, mixed-salt passivation has also been developed. The mixed-salt passivation provides a new strategy of designing new passivated materials, which could get benefits form signal material as well as the combined synergistic effect of two salts. Cho and co-workers reported a mixture of iso-butylammonium iodide (iBAI) and formammidinium iodide (FAI) to post-treat the as-prepared 3D perovskite layer, which enhanced both the efficiency and the long-term stability of PSCs after the treatment [27]. It is observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) that, as shown in Figure 3, the mixed-salt treatment significantly changed the perovskite surface morphology as the iBAI content increased with the formation of an interfacial layer. The authors also speculated that the passivation mechanism that the FAI reacts with the excessive PbI2 from the 3D perovskite reacts under the assistance of iBAI during the crystallization process, whereas FAI itself without iBAI cannot achieve the same results due to the insufficient annealing temperature. In addition, the formation of such an interfacial energetic barrier can effectively reduce the ionic transport, leading to a significantly suppressed photocurrent hysteresis. More recently, we proposed and investigated a systematic study of the mixed-salt passivation strategy of different F-substituted alkyl lengths of ammonium iodide, CF3CH2NH3I (TEAI), CF3(CF2)2CH2NH3I (HBAI) and CF3(CF2)5CH2NH3I (THAI) coupled with formammidinium bromide (FABr) [28,29]. We realized that the introduction of FABr resulted in a surface reconstruction with excessive PbI2 from the 3D perovskite, leading to the formation of an ultra-thin layer of FAPbIxBr3-x, which can be observed from SEM images and XRD patterns, as shown in Figure 4. Meanwhile, F-substituted the ammonium iodide passivated not only the surface but also the perovskite bulk through penetration into the grain boundaries, as evidenced by the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling shown in Figure 4. In addition, it is worth noticing that the shorter the length the alkyl ammonium iodide employs, the deeper it diffuses into the underlaying 3D perovskite, resulting in a champion PCE of 23.5%. Furthermore, all devices passivated with TEAI · FABr, HBAI · FABr or THAI · FABr shown more moisture tolerance with a water droplet contact angle of around 60 ° on the perovskite surface, owing to the introduction of F-substituted alkyl ammonium salts. As a result, the best performing device with TEAI · FABr treatment retained a remarkable 98% PCE of its initial value after exposing to a humidity of 30–60% in the dark for 800 h. Remarkably, the target devices also present excellent operational stability under continuous one sun illumination for 600 h with only 8% PCE drop, whereas the control device suffered from a 15% PCE drop of its initial value. This result illustrates the important of the synergistic effect provided by the mixed-salt passivation system in obtaining high efficiency and long-term stability simultaneously.

5. Summary and Outlook

Efficiency and stability have been identified as the most important challenges for the commercialization of perovskite solar cells. In this review, we expounded various passivation approaches of perovskite film through surface reconstruction to make efficient and stable perovskite solar cells on n-i-p configuration. In general, such passivation treatment improves the device performance of a PSC in the following ways:
(1)
Reconstructing the perovskite surface through the formation of an optimized layer of either 3D or low-dimensional perovskite aiming to reduce trap defects, hinder ion migration and suppress the non-radiative recombination centers.
(2)
Adjusting the energy levels through the newly formed interlayer to improve the charge carrier extraction and/or block electron transfer.
(3)
Enhancing the surface hydrophobicity through the formation of a more robust low-dimensional perovskite layer, which consequently improves the device stability, especially under humid conditions. In comparison, the formation of an additional 3D perovskite interlayer shows limited improvement in long-term stability due to the inherent instability of the 3D perovskite against moisture.
(4)
Combined improvements provided by mixed-salt system through synergistic effect.
Although tremendous efforts have been spent on optimizing PSCs with passivation treatment, there is still a lack of systematic studies on developing general rules and criteria for material selection and their passivation mechanisms. In addition, more characterization and theoretical calculation methods need to be further developed.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and B.Y.; supervision, A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

J.S. acknowledges the Swiss National Science Foundation for financial support (No. 200020_185041). B.Y. acknowledges the funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 764047.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskite as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, H.-S.; Lee, C.-R.; Im, J.-H.; Lee, K.-B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S.-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Yum, J.-H.; Moser, J.E.; et al. Lead Iodide Perovskite Sensitized All-Solid-State Submicron Thin Film Mesoscopic Solar Cell with Efficiency Exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Sanith, H.J. Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Best Research-Cell Efficiencies Chart. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-research-cell-efficiencies.20210625.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2020).
  5. Luo, D.; Su, R.; Zhang, W.; Gong, Q.; Zhu, R. Minimizing Non-Radiative Recombination Losses in Perovskite Solar Cells. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ran, C.; Xu, J.; Gao, W.; Huang, C.; Dou, S. Defects in Metal Triiodide Perovskite Materials Towards High-Performance Solar Cells: Origin, Impact, Characterization, and Engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4581–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, T.-H.; Tan, S.; Xue, J.; Meng, L.; Lee, J.-W.; Yang, Y. Interface and Defect Engineering for Metal Halide Perovskite Optoelectronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akin, S.; Arora, N.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Friend, R.H.; Dar, M.I. New Strategies for Defect Passivation in High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aydin, E.; De Bastiani, M.; De Wolf, S. Defect and Contact Passivation for Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; You, J. Recent Progresses on Defect Passivation toward Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yusoff, A.R.M.; Vasilopoulou, M.; Georgiadou, D.G.; Palilis, L.C.; Abate, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Passivation and Process Engineering Approaches of Halide Perovskite Films for High Efficiency and Stability Perovskite Solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2906–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Q.; Zhou, H.; Song, T.-B.; Luo, S.; Hong, Z.; Duan, H.-S.; Dou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y. Controllable Self-Induced Passivation of Hybrid Lead Iodide Perovskites toward High Performance Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 4158–4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jacobsson, T.J.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Anaraki, E.H.; Philippe, B.; Stranks, S.D.; Bouduban, M.E.F.; Tress, W.; Schenk, K.; Teuscher, J.; Moser, J.-E.; et al. Unreacted PbI2 as a Double-Edged Sword for Enhancing the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10331–10343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, Y.C.; Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Seo, J.; Yun, J.S.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Huang, S.; Green, M.A.; Seidel, J.; et al. Beneficial Effects of PbI2 Incorporated in Organo-Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, F.; Dong, Q.; Wong, M.K.; Djurišić, A.B.; Ng, A.; Ren, Z.; Shen, Q.; Surya, C.; Chan, W.K.; Wang, J.; et al. Is Excess PbI2 Beneficial for Perovskite Solar Cell Performance? Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tumen-Ulzii, G.; Qin, C.; Klotz, D.; Leyden, M.R.; Wang, P.; Auffray, M.; Fujihara, T.; Matsushima, T.; Lee, J.-W.; Lee, S.-J.; et al. Detrimental Effect of Unreacted PbI2 on the Long-Term Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1905035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cho, K.T.; Paek, S.; Grancini, G.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Gao, P.; Lee, Y.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells with a Compositionally Engineered Perovskite/Hole Transporting Material Interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, G.; Koh, T.K.; Lim, S.S.; Goh, T.W.; Guo, X.; Leow, S.W.; Begum, R.; Sum, T.C.; Mathews, N.; Mhaisalkar, S. Facile Method to Reduce Surface Defects and Trap Densities in Perovskite Photovoltaics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 21292–21297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, T.; Long, M.; Yan, K.; Qin, M.; Lu, X.; Zeng, X.; Cheng, C.M.; Wong, S.K.; Liu, P.; Xie, W.; et al. Crystallinity Preservation and Ion Migration Suppression through Dual Ion Exchange Strategy for Stable Mixed Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsai, H.; Nie, W.; Blancon, J.-C.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Asadpour, R.; Harutyunyan, B.; Neukirch, A.J.; Verduzco, R.; Crochet, J.J.; Tretiak, S.; et al. High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite solar cells. Nature 2016, 536, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, H.; Lee, S.-U.; Lee, D.Y.; Paik, M.J.; Na, H.; Lee, J.; Seok, S.I. Optimal Interfacial Engineering with Different Length of Alkylammonium Halide for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1902740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoo, J.J.; Wieghold, S.; Sponseller, M.C.; Chua, M.R.; Bertram, S.N.; Hartono, N.T.P.; Tresback, J.S.; Hansen, E.C.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Bulović, V.; et al. An Interface Stabilized Perovskite Solar Cell with High Stabilized Efficiency and Low Voltage Loss. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2192–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, Y.; Akin, S.; Pan, L.; Uchida, R.; Arora, N.; Milić, J.; Hinderhofer, A.; Schreiber, F.; Uhl, A.R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; et al. Ultrahydrophobic 3D/2D Fluoroarene Bilayer-based Water-resistant Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiencies Exceeding 22%. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, 2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, N.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zai, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Ma, S.; Gao, Z.; Wang, X.; et al. An in situ Cross-linked 1D/3D Perovskite Heterostructure Improves the Stability of Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells for over 3000 h Operation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4344–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, P.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S.; Lyu, M.; Yun, J.-H.; Wang, L. In Situ Growth of 2D Perovskite Capping Layer for Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mahmud, M.A.; Duong, T.; Yin, Y.; Pham, H.Y.; Walter, D.; Peng, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; Shen, H.; Wu, N.; et al. Double-Sided Surface Passivation of 3D Perovskite Film for High-Efficiency Mixed-Dimensional Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1907962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cho, Y.; Soufiani, A.M.; Yun, J.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, D.S.; Seidel, J.; Deng, X.; Green, M.A.; Huang, S.; Ho-Baillie, A.W.Y. Mixed 3D–2D Passivation Treatment for Mixed-Cation Lead Mixed-Halide Perovskite Solar Cells for Higher Efficiency and Better Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, B.; Suo, J.; Mosconi, E.; Ricciarelli, D.; Tress, W.; De Angelis, F.; Kim, H.-S.; Hagfeldt, A. Outstanding Passivation Effect by a Mixed-Salt Interlayer with Internal Interactions in Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3159–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suo, J.; Yang, B.; Mosconi, E.; Choi, H.-S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; De Angelis, F.; Grätzel, M.; Kim, H.-S.; Hagfeldt, A. Surface Reconstruction Engineering with Synergistic Effect of Mixed-Salt Passivation Treatment toward Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 2102902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Energy alignment and bandgap of PbI2 and perovskite is shown on the top left. The schematic n-i-p structure is shown on the bottom left. (I) The interface of perovskite/TiO2 before and after the introduction of PbI2 is described on the top right. (II) The interface of perovskite/HTM before and after the introduction of PbI2 is shown on the bottom right. Reprinted with permission from reference [12]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. Energy alignment and bandgap of PbI2 and perovskite is shown on the top left. The schematic n-i-p structure is shown on the bottom left. (I) The interface of perovskite/TiO2 before and after the introduction of PbI2 is described on the top right. (II) The interface of perovskite/HTM before and after the introduction of PbI2 is shown on the bottom right. Reprinted with permission from reference [12]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society.
Energies 14 04836 g001
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of the fabrication method of FABr passivated perovskite film. Top-view SEM images of (b) reference film and (c) FABr passivated film. Proposed change of film cross sectional structures of (d) reference film and (e) FABr passivated film. Republished with permission of Royal Society of Chemistry, from reference [17].
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of the fabrication method of FABr passivated perovskite film. Top-view SEM images of (b) reference film and (c) FABr passivated film. Proposed change of film cross sectional structures of (d) reference film and (e) FABr passivated film. Republished with permission of Royal Society of Chemistry, from reference [17].
Energies 14 04836 g002
Figure 3. Top-view SEM images of (a) pristine perovskite film and (bf) post-treated perovskite film with the increase ratio of iBAI. Republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons, from reference [27].
Figure 3. Top-view SEM images of (a) pristine perovskite film and (bf) post-treated perovskite film with the increase ratio of iBAI. Republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons, from reference [27].
Energies 14 04836 g003
Figure 4. Top-view HR-SEM images of perovskite. (a) Control films and perovskite film with treatment of (b) TEAI∙FABr, (c) HBAI∙FABr and (d) THAI∙FABr. (e) GIXRD patterns of pristine film and passivated perovskite film with TEAI∙FABr, HBAI∙FABr and THAI∙FABr. (f) EDS spectra of the grain boundary and grain of the TEAI·FABr treated perovskite film. (g) XPS depth profiling spectra of the post-treated films with TEAI∙FABr, HBAI∙FABr and THAI∙FABr. Copyright from reference [29].
Figure 4. Top-view HR-SEM images of perovskite. (a) Control films and perovskite film with treatment of (b) TEAI∙FABr, (c) HBAI∙FABr and (d) THAI∙FABr. (e) GIXRD patterns of pristine film and passivated perovskite film with TEAI∙FABr, HBAI∙FABr and THAI∙FABr. (f) EDS spectra of the grain boundary and grain of the TEAI·FABr treated perovskite film. (g) XPS depth profiling spectra of the post-treated films with TEAI∙FABr, HBAI∙FABr and THAI∙FABr. Copyright from reference [29].
Energies 14 04836 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suo, J.; Yang, B.; Hagfeldt, A. Passivation Strategies through Surface Reconstruction toward Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells on n-i-p Architecture. Energies 2021, 14, 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164836

AMA Style

Suo J, Yang B, Hagfeldt A. Passivation Strategies through Surface Reconstruction toward Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells on n-i-p Architecture. Energies. 2021; 14(16):4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164836

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suo, Jiajia, Bowen Yang, and Anders Hagfeldt. 2021. "Passivation Strategies through Surface Reconstruction toward Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells on n-i-p Architecture" Energies 14, no. 16: 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164836

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop