# Feasibility for Damage Identification in Offshore Wind Jacket Structures through Monitoring of Global Structural Dynamics

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Damage Identification Approach

#### 2.1. Metrics and the Modal Assurance Criterion Equation

#### 2.2. Algorithms, MAC vs. Frequency

#### 2.3. Modal Flexibility Based Damage Metric

## 3. Case Study Structure and Model

## 4. Structural Model and Damage Modelling

#### 4.1. General Approach

#### 4.2. Joint Damage

#### 4.3. Pile Interaction

#### 4.4. Bolted Connection

#### 4.5. Corrosion and Marine Growth

## 5. Detectability Considerations

#### 5.1. Dependence on Nacelle Direction of Modal Properties in Intact Condition

#### 5.2. Choice of Damage Metric

^{4}, but not any of the other similar sharp reductions. While the MAC returned to a relatively high value, the damage index continued to increase as more damage was implemented, therefore, the damage index is a better choice for quantifying the level of damage.

## 6. Results

#### 6.1. Joint Damage

#### 6.1.1. Joint Loss

#### 6.1.2. Damage at Varied Nacelle Direction

#### 6.2. Soil

#### 6.2.1. Global Scour

#### 6.2.2. Displacement Factor

#### 6.2.3. Characteristic Strength

#### 6.3. Bolted Connection

#### 6.4. Corrosion and Marine Growth

#### 6.4.1. Corrosion

#### 6.4.2. Marine Growth

## 7. Discussion

## 8. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Martinez-Luengo, M.; Shafiee, M. Guidelines and cost-benefit analysis of the structural health monitoring implementation in offshore wind turbine support structures. Energies
**2019**, 12, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kolios, A.J.; Smolka, U. Risk-based maintenance strategies for offshore wind energy assets. In Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Palm Springs, CA, USA, 27–30 January 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-K.; Chai, J.-F.; Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, T.-Y.; Kuo, Y.-S. Development of seismic demand for chang-bin offshore wind farm in taiwan strait. Energies
**2016**, 9, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ju, S.-H.; Huang, Y.-C. Analyses of offshore wind turbine structures with soil-structure interaction under earthquakes. Ocean Eng.
**2019**, 187, 106190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Konstandakopoulou, F.; Konstantinidou, M.; Pnevmatikos, N.; Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. Safety and performance of offshore platforms subjected to repeated earthquakes. Infrastructures
**2020**, 5, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Konstandakopoulou, F.D.; Evangelinos, K.I.; Nikolaou, I.E.; Papagiannopoulos, G.A.; Pnevmatikos, N.G. Seismic analysis of offshore platforms subjected to pulse-type ground motions compatible with European Standards. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
**2020**, 129, 105713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cevasco, D.; Koukoura, S.; Kolios, A.J. Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2021**, 136, 110414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Luczak, M.M.; Telega, J.; Zagato, N.; Mucchi, E. On the damage detection of a laboratory scale model of a tripod supporting structure by vibration-based methods. Mar. Struct.
**2019**, 64, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tcherniak, D.; Chauhan, S.; Hansen, M.H. Applicability limits of operational modal analysis to operational wind turbines. In Structural Dynamics and Renewable Energy; Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series; Springer: Jacksonville, FL, USA, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 317–327. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G.; Zhai, Y.; Leng, D.; Tian, X.; Mu, W. Research on structural damage detection of offshore platforms based on grouping modal strain energy. Ocean Eng.
**2017**, 140, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, M.; Wang, S.; Li, H. A residual strain energy based damage localisation method for offshore platforms under environmental variations. Ships Offshore Struct.
**2018**, 14, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, W. Numerical and experimental investigation of modal-energy-based damage localization for offshore wind turbine structures. Adv. Struct. Eng.
**2018**, 21, 1510–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fathi, A.; Esfandiari, A.; Fadavie, M.; Mojtahedi, A. Damage detection in an offshore platform using incomplete noisy FRF data by a novel Bayesian model updating method. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 217, 108023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mousavi, Z.; Varahram, S.; Ettefagh, M.M.; Sadeghi, M.H.; Razavi, S.N. Deep neural networks–based damage detection using vibration signals of finite element model and real intact state: An evaluation via a lab-scale offshore jacket structure. Struct. Health Monit.
**2020**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oliveira, G.; Magalhães, F.; Cunha, Á.; Caetano, E. Vibration—Based damage detection in a wind turbine using 1 year of data. Struct. Control Health Monit.
**2018**, 25, e2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Weijtjens, W.; Verbelen, T.; Capello, E.; Devriendt, C. Vibration based structural health monitoring of the substructures of five offshore wind turbines. Procedia Eng.
**2017**, 199, 2294–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yi, J.H. Laboratory tests on local damage detection for jacket-type offshore structures using optical FBG sensors based on statistical approaches. Ocean Eng.
**2016**, 124, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mieloszyk, M.; Luczak, M.M.; Mucchi, E.; Telega, J.; Ostachowicz, W.M. Damage detection in laboratory scale model of the offshore support structure using two different measurement techniques. In Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2016), Bilbao, Spain, 5–8 July 2016; pp. 2430–2439. [Google Scholar]
- Stubbs, N.; Farrar, C.; Kim, J. Field Verification of a Nondestructive Damage Localization and Severity Estimation Algorithm. In Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering; SPIE International Society for Optical: Nashville, TN, USA, 1995; p. 210. [Google Scholar]
- Wandji, W.N. Rayleigh’s quotient-based damage detection algorithm: Theoretical concepts, computational techniques, and field implementation strategies. Struct. Health Monit.
**2017**, 17, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cevasco, D.; Tautz-Weinert, J.; Kolios, A.J.; Smolka, U. Applicability of machine learning approaches for structural damage detection of offshore wind jacket structures based on low resolution data. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2020**, 1618, 022063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jeong, S.; Kim, E.J.; Shin, D.H.; Park, J.W.; Sim, S.H. Data fusion-based damage identification for a monopile offshore wind turbine structure using wireless smart sensors. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 195, 106728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fan, W.; Qiao, P. Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A review and Comparative Study. Struct. Health Monit.
**2010**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ziegler, L.; Cosack, N.; Kolios, A.; Muskulus, M. Structural monitoring for lifetime extension of offshore wind monopiles: Verification of strain-based load extrapolation algorithm. Mar. Struct.
**2019**, 66, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ivanhoe, R.O.; Wang, L.; Kolios, A. Generic framework for reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine jacket support structures under stochastic and time dependent variables. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 216, 107691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shittu, A.A.; Mehmanparast, A.; Shafiee, M.; Kolios, A.; Hart, P.; Pilario, K. Structural reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures subjected to pitting corrosion-fatigue: A damage tolerance modelling approach. Wind Energy
**2020**, 23, 2004–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Malekzehtab, H.; Golafshani, A.A. Damage detection in an offshore jacket platform using genetic algorithm based finite element model updating with noisy modal data. Procedia Eng.
**2013**, 54, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, K.; Yan, R.-J.; Guedes Soares, C. Damage identification in offshore jacket structures based on modal flexibility. Ocean Eng.
**2018**, 170, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, H. Damage Localization of an Offshore Platform considering Temperature Variations. Math. Probl. Eng.
**2015**, 2015, 954926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Nguyen, C.U.; Huynh, T.C.; Kim, J.T. Vibration-based damage detection in wind turbine towers using artificial neural networks. Struct. Monit. Maint.
**2018**, 5, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rytter, A. Vibrational Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Luengo, M.; Kolios, A.; Wang, L. Structural Health Monitoring of Offshore Wind Turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2016**, 64, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Song, Y.; Liang, L.; Du, Y.; Sun, B. Railway polygonized wheel detection based on numerical time-frequency analysis of axle-box acceleration. Appl. Sci.
**2020**, 10, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Pastor, M.; Binda, M.; Harčarik, T. Modal Assurance Criterion. Procedia Eng.
**2012**, 48, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kuhn, H.W. Variants of the hungarian method for assignment problems. Nav. Res. Logist. Q.
**1956**, 3, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - BLADT Industries. Wikinger Offshore Wind Farm. Available online: https://stateofgreen.com/en/partners/bladt-industries-as-make-sustainable-steel-solutions/solutions/wikinger-offshore-wind-farm-foundations/ (accessed on 4 June 2019).
- Wikinger, the Project that Consolidates Germany as a Strategic Market. Available online: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/lines-business/flagship-projects/wikinger-offshore-wind-farm (accessed on 4 June 2019).
- Ramboll. ROSA, Program ROSA Structural Analysis, User’s Guide; Ramboll: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Passon, P.; Branner, K.; Larsen, S.E.; Rasmussen, H.J. Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation Design; Technical University of Denmark—DTU: Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- American Petroleum Institute. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design, 21st ed.; American Petroleum Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Jonkman, J.; Musial, W. Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) for IEA Task 23 Offshore Wind Technology and Deployment; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2010; Volume 303. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scheu, M.N.; Tremps, L.; Smolka, U.; Kolios, A.; Brennan, F. A systematic Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis for offshore wind turbine systems towards integrated condition based maintenance strategies. Ocean Eng.
**2019**, 176, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Luengo, M.M.; Kolios, A. Failure mode identification and end of life scenarios of offshore wind turbines: A review. Energies
**2015**, 8, 8339–8354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Weijtjens, W.; Verbelen, T.; De Sitter, G.; Devriendt, C. Foundation structural health monitoring of an offshore wind turbine—A full-scale case study. Struct. Health Monit.
**2015**, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Guo, J.; Jiang, Z. A Damage identification approach for offshore jacket platforms using partial modal results and artificial neural networks. Appl. Sci.
**2018**, 8, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Budyanas, R.G.; Nisbett, J.K. Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Adedipe, O.; Brennan, F.; Mehmanparast, A.; Kolios, A.; Tavares, I. Corrosion fatigue crack growth mechanisms in offshore monopile steel weldments. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
**2017**, 40, 1868–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Martinez-Luengo, M.; Causon, P.; Gill, A.B.; Kolios, A.J. The effect of marine growth dynamics in offshore wind turbine support structures. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference On Marine Structures, Lisbon, Portugal, 8–10 May 2017; pp. 889–898. [Google Scholar]
- Jusoh, I.; Wolfram, J. Effects of Marine Growth and Hydrodynamic Loading on Offshore Structures. J. Mek.
**1996**, 1, 77–96. [Google Scholar] - Pascual, G. Investigation on the Influence of Marine Growth on the Dynamics of FowT; Cranfield University: Cranfield, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Anton, H.; Rorres, C. Elementary Linear Algebra, 11th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Weinert, J.; Smolka, U.; Schümann, B.; Cheng, P.W. Detecting Critical Scour Developments at Monopile Foundations Under Operating Conditions. In Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, EWEA 2015, Scientific Proceedings, Paris, France, 17–20 November 2015; pp. 135–139. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Luengo, M.; Kolios, A.; Wang, L. Parametric FEA modelling of offshore wind turbine support structures: Towards scaling-up and CAPEX reduction. Int. J. Mar. Energy
**2017**, 19, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Diagram of damage process used to map damages implemented in a structural model with structural response caused by a change in the structure.

**Figure 2.**Example case showing the eigenfrequencies of the first 10 modes as the stiffness of a leg element is reduced from design stiffness to complete loss of stiffness.

**Figure 3.**Shapes of first five modes along with their respective frequencies. Colored by total displacement. (

**a**) Tower modes 1 and 2, (

**b**) torsional mode 3, (

**c**) swaying modes 4 and 5.

**Figure 4.**Representation of the structure in ROSA, including appurtenance, sea and soil. Labels of joints presented.

**Figure 5.**Modal assurance criterion (MAC) values for the undamaged case as nacelle direction is rotated in comparison to 0 degrees. Comparison is made to the original direction at 0 degrees. Mode shapes are transformed to the original reference.

**Figure 7.**‘Damage index’ as a result of changing nacelle direction, with no damage implamented. This comparative value is calculated in comparison to the nacelle at 0 degree case.

**Figure 8.**MAC values for the first five modes as simulated damage to a leg element is implemented. (

**a**) Mode frequency value; (

**b**) MAC value, both with comparison based on mode frequency; (

**c**) mode frequency value; (

**d**) MAC value, both with comparison based on maximized MAC values.

**Figure 11.**MAC values for the leg damaged case at varying nacelle directions compared to undamaged case at 0 degrees. Mode shapes have been transformed back to original reference.

**Figure 12.**Effect of gradually increased depth of global scour, compared to 0 scour depth. Modes compared based on maximized MAC (

**a**) Difference in natural frequency, (

**b**) MAC value. Scour depth in meters for the 23 m × 23 m jacket.

**Figure 13.**Effect of displacement factor compared to a factor of 1. (

**a**) Difference in frequency, (

**b**) MAC value.

**Figure 16.**Effect of corrosion relative to the uncorroded structure. (

**a**) Change in frequency, (

**b**) MAC values.

**Figure 17.**Effect of marine growth relative to the unfouled structure. (

**a**) Change in frequency, (

**b**) MAC values.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Richmond, M.; Smolka, U.; Kolios, A.
Feasibility for Damage Identification in Offshore Wind Jacket Structures through Monitoring of Global Structural Dynamics. *Energies* **2020**, *13*, 5791.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215791

**AMA Style**

Richmond M, Smolka U, Kolios A.
Feasibility for Damage Identification in Offshore Wind Jacket Structures through Monitoring of Global Structural Dynamics. *Energies*. 2020; 13(21):5791.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215791

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Richmond, Mark, Ursula Smolka, and Athanasios Kolios.
2020. "Feasibility for Damage Identification in Offshore Wind Jacket Structures through Monitoring of Global Structural Dynamics" *Energies* 13, no. 21: 5791.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215791