Next Article in Journal
Qualitative and Quantitative Characterisation of Major Elements in Particulate Matter from In-use Diesel Engine Passenger Vehicles by LIBS
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Investigation of Very-Large-Scale Motions in a Turbulent Boundary Layer for Different Roughness
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Scale Analysis and Pattern Recognition of Ultrasonic Signals of PD in a Liquid/Solid Composite of an Oil-Filled Terminal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Dilution Effect on CH4/Air Premixed Turbulent Flame Using OH and CH2O Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Experimental Study on the Jet Pressure Performance of Organ–Helmholtz (O-H), Self-Excited Oscillating Nozzles

1
Hubei Key Laboratory of Waterjet Theory and New Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
3
Chinese Ship Research and Design Center, Wuhan 430064, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(2), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020367
Submission received: 19 November 2019 / Revised: 2 January 2020 / Accepted: 3 January 2020 / Published: 12 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineering Fluid Dynamics 2019-2020)

Abstract

:
To make a better application of the self-excited oscillation jet, a compound organ–Helmholtz oscillation nozzle (OH nozzle) was designed to generate better pulse effects in the present study. The effects of geometric parameters on pressure characteristics of self-excited oscillation jets were investigated experimentally. The geometric parameters of OH nozzles were determined based on the design principle of the organ-pipe and Helmholtz nozzles. Various types of OH nozzles were tested to obtain the relationship between oscillation pressure and geometric parameters. Experimental results showed that some structural parameters are sensitive to the pump pressure, while others are not. The optimum geometric optimum parameters were obtained based on experimental results. The peak pressure and pressure pulsation amplitude are closely related to the target distance. The peak pressure decreases sharply with target distance at first and decreases with a further increase of the target distance. The peak pressure becomes stable beyond a certain range of target distance. With the increase of the target distance, the pressure pulsation amplitude increases at first and then decreases. The optimum target distance was determined based on experimental results to achieve better pulsation performance and has a value of 20 mm in the present study.

1. Introduction

Waterjet technology has been applied in a wide range of industries, including cutting [1], cleaning [2], surface treatment [3], coal and gas exploration [4,5], etc. Hu et al. [1] used an ultra-high-pressure water jet for cutting rubber, and it was found that the water jet was capable of recycling rubber materials without damaging the internal organizational structures of materials. Kohan et al. [2] investigated a jetting system to move the self-elevating mobile jack-up units, which are employed for offshore exploration and development purposes. Soyama et al. [3] used the waterjet to increase peening intensity, and the improvement of the fatigue strength of stainless steel was observed. Lin et al. [4] proposed the cross-borehole hydraulic slotting technique, and the minimum period of gas drainage was reduced in this way.
Waterjets are categorized into pulsed waterjets [6], abrasive waterjets [7], cavitating waterjets [8], rotating waterjets [9], and so on. Among them, pulsed waterjets, which can improve cutting efficiency because of the water-hammer effect, have attracted the interest of researchers [10]. Mechanical methods, including wobbling, rotating, and reciprocating, are the ordinary ways of producing pulsed waterjets. Though these methods have been successfully applied, the equipment for mechanical methods is complex and the reliability is not satisfactory [11,12,13]. In order to get more powerful waterjets with simpler devices, self-excited oscillation waterjets are becoming the hotspot in the field of waterjets. Different from mechanical methods, self-excited methods produce effective pulsed waterjets by specially designed nozzles, which turn continuous jets into discontinuous pulse jets without any moving parts [14,15]. Ding et al. [16] utilized a self-excited jet in surface peening and achieved better performance. Recently, Huang et al. [17] conducted experiments of the self-excited oscillating jets, and observed both a higher peak pressure and a higher erosion rate, indicating its high applicability for oil-gas exploration and development. Li utilized self-excited jets in petroleum engineering, and improvements in penetration rates were observed.
The nozzles are the key devices for generating self-excited oscillation jets, and their geometric parameters are closely related to the jet’s performance. At present, organ-pipe nozzles and Helmholtz nozzles are the most common and efficient nozzles used to produce self-excited oscillation waterjets. The structural diagram and working principle of the organ-pipe nozzle are shown in Figure 1. The resonance chamber of the organ-pipe nozzle mainly consists of two co-axial cylindrical cavities. Fluid enters from the upper chamber and flows out through the lower chamber. Johnson et al. [18,19] found that organ-pipe nozzles could improve rock cutting capability and efficiency by nearly six times. It was demonstrated that self-excited oscillations would occur in the nozzle if the excitation frequency was near the fundamental frequency of the nozzle. Chahine et al. [20] found that the efficiency of organ-pipe nozzles was more than two orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional nozzles. Besides, he concluded that bubbles resulting from highly resonant organ-pipe nozzles were the main reason for improving the erosion capability [21]. Li et al. [22,23] studied the effects of area discontinuity at nozzle inlet on the oscillation characteristics of organ-pipe nozzles. And the experiment results showed that area enlargement and contraction have a positive effect on the pressure fluctuation characteristics of the jets.
Helmholtz nozzles are also used to generate self-excited oscillation jets. The basic structure and working principle of the Helmholtz nozzle are shown in Figure 2. The resonance chamber is the structure where jets oscillation is generated and develops, and the cavity’s shape is cylindrical. Compared to organ-pipe nozzles, Helmholtz nozzles have better jet oscillation performance, especially in the air, but they do not function well under high pump pressure [24]. Wilson et al. [25] first established a model of Helmholtz nozzles. He concluded that jet instability would form a large number of vortex rings, and the impact of the vortex rings was the main factor to generate pulsation in the nozzle. Crow et al. [26] found that the edge shear layer of jets showed an obvious trend of a structured vortex ring when the external excitation frequency matched with the natural frequency of the air jet. Rockwell et al. [27] studied the self-excited oscillation mechanism from four aspects: feedback, frequency, amplitude, and resonance. In the experiment introduced by Morel et al. [28], pressure fluctuations can exceed 5.6 times the value of jet dynamic pressure. This is owing to the resonance between the oscillating chamber of the Helmholtz nozzle and unstable jets, which amplifies the pressure pulsation. In recent years, experimental measures have been developed. Geveci et al. [29] used a three-dimensional particle video graph to measure the change rule of flow longitude in the pipeline cavitation system. They pointed out that the oscillation characteristics of moving fluid passing through the cavity in the pipeline were related to the instability of the fluid boundary layer and the fixed vibration characteristics of the cavity. This further confirms the important role of the nozzle oscillating chamber structure for the stroke pulse jet. Kolsek et al. [30] studied the influence of different structure parameters on the characteristics of the self-excited oscillation pulse waterjet, and found vortex structure and its pattern of change over time in the Helmholtz oscillation nozzles. Based on the thickness of the approach boundary layer, Ma et al. [31] proposed a model for predicting pressure fluctuations. Hu et al. [32] proposed a new methodology of generating pulsed air-water jets by entraining and mixing air into the cavity of the Helmholtz oscillator, and found that there was an optimum cavity length corresponding to the jet dynamic pressure.
From the middle of the last century, a considerable amount of research has been carried out on self-excited oscillation waterjets, especially on organ-pipe nozzles and Helmholtz nozzles. However, it is hard to significantly improve certain nozzle pulsed performances based on the key parameter designing. At an international conference in the United States in 2007, Hlavac proposed a nozzle composed of an organ pipe and a Helmholtz chamber [33,34]. Double-chamber strengthened nozzles are studied in this article. It is an effective idea to use two chambers to generate self-excited oscillation pulse waterjets, as reasonable cooperation of both resonance chambers stimulates fluid resonance more obviously. To the best of our knowledge, there is, so far, little literature on this kind of composite nozzle, and the flow field structure and pressure pulsation rule inside the nozzle are rarely involved. In this study, the OH composite nozzle (organ–Helmholtz composite nozzles) experiments were carried out; the axial peak pressure and pressure oscillation pulsation amplitude of jet flow were taken as the parameters to evaluate the jet performance. This paper serves as a supplement to the previous research on waterjets and the beginning of the study into organ–Helmholtz composite nozzles.

2. Structural Principle of Self-Excited Oscillation Nozzle

The relationships between the structural parameters of different types of nozzles and their natural frequencies were analyzed based on the theory of fluid network model.

2.1. Structural Principle of Organ-Pipe Nozzles

The natural frequency is determined by geometry and material of the resonance chamber,
f = K N c L 1 ,
where c is the wave velocity, which is related to material of nozzle. L1 is the length of oscillation cavity. KN is the coefficient, which is related to the diameter of organ-pipe oscillation cavity.
K N = F { N , ( d 1 d 2 ) 2 , ( d 2 d 3 ) 2 } = { 2 N 1 4 ,   i f [ ( d 1 d 2 ) 2 1   a n d   ( d 2 d 3 ) 2 1   ] N 2 ,           i f [ ( d 1 d 2 ) 2 1   a n d   ( d 2 d 3 ) 2 1   ] .
According to the principle of hydroacoustics, the resonant standing wave is close to that of the fluid critical self-excited structure, which is determined by the critical Strouhal number of the nozzle. Their relationship is as follows:
S t * = f * · d 3 v ,
where S t * is the critical Strouhal number, f * is the critical oscillation frequency, d3 is diameter of nozzle outlet, and v is the jet velocity. The jet velocity v can be expressed by the Mach number,
M a = v c .
From the above two equations, we can obtain
f * = S t * · M a d 3 c .
When the resonant standing wave frequency is equal to or close to the nozzle natural frequency, a self-oscillating jet is formed. According to previous research [23,31], when the critical Strouhal number is a multiple of 0.3, a strong oscillation phenomenon can occur in the cavity. Combining Equations (3) and (5), the relationship between the length of the oscillating chamber and the diameter of the outlet can be obtained [18,35].
L 1 d 3 = K N M a S t * .
In the self-excited oscillation case, S t * can be expressed with the use of S L * . According to the theory of Morel [29], S L *   is given as follows.
S t * = S L * d 4 L 2 ;
S L * = ( N 0.25 L 1 f ) u c u .
The oscillation frequency is calculated through:
f = c 2 π π d 3 4 V .
Substituting the length L1 of the cavity and the diameter d2 of the cavity into the Equation (8):
f = c 2 π d 2 d 3 L 1 .
The Strouhal number can be substituted into the above equation.
d 2 d 3 = 1 2 π S t M a d 3 L 1 .
According to the experiment, when the Strouhal number is 0.6, the cavity length to diameter ratio is 0.8, so the oscillation effect is obvious.

2.2. Structural Principle of Helmholtz Nozzles

When S t is a critical value, the jet ejected from the nozzle becomes a discontinuous vortex circulation. The natural frequency relationship of the Helmholtz resonator is calculated as follows:
f = c 2 π d 4 d 3 L 2 .
Equation (11) can be expressed using S t and Ma as follows:
d 4 d 3   =   1 2 π S t M a d 3 L 2 .
The above equation is the relationship showing that the Helmholtz cavity diameter (d4) should be satisfied. When the vortex from d1 reaches the second injection hole d2, the pressure signal returns to d1 after the time tL = L2/c. If the cavity length L2 makes the time for the pressure signal to reach d1 exactly equal to the time required to generate a new vortex, the vibration in the cavity is amplified to produce a strong resonance at the time. So the cavity length L2 should satisfy the following equation:
L 2 = n λ t L u c ,
where n is the number of vortexes and uc is the vortex convective velocity. Introducing St and Ma, then, making α = uc /u1, it can be derived from the relationship that the cavity length L2 should satisfy
L 2 d 3 = n α S t ( 1 + α M a ) .
If the fluid in the organ-pipe oscillation chamber and the Helmholtz oscillation chamber resonates, their natural frequencies must be equal or satisfy the multiple relationship; the following relationship:
f O = N f H ,
where f O   is the natural frequency of organ nozzle, f H is the natural frequency of Helmholtz nozzle, and N is a positive integer.
K N c L 1 = N c 2 π d 4 d 3 L 2 ,
where a is the jet velocity, c is the disturbance wave velocity, and K N is the coefficient which is related to the diameter of pipeline oscillating chamber.
The above Equations (6), (11), (13), (15), and (17) can be applied as a reference for the design of the OH self-excited nozzle.

3. Experimental Setup and Procedures

3.1. Structural Principle of OH Self-Excited Nozzle

The structure diagram of the OH self-excited oscillation nozzle is shown in Figure 3. It consists of two main sections. One is the upstream organ tunnel oscillating chamber and the other is the downstream Helmholtz oscillating chamber. If the two nozzles are compounded by a certain principle, jet pulsation generated in the oscillating chamber of the organ tube is amplified after entering the Helmholtz oscillation chamber. That means that the slight disturbance is amplified twice. Therefore, the nozzle with this structure can produce a pulsation that is more intense than the organ tube nozzle and the Helmholtz nozzle at the same pump pressure.
The key parameters determining the jet performance in the composite nozzle are as follows: d1/d2 is called the upper cross-sectional diameter shrink ratio. d2/d3 is called a lower cross-sectional diameter shrink ratio. The above two parameters have a great relationship with the performance of organ-pipe resonance chamber. Besides, d3/d5 is the ratio of inlet and outlet diameter of the Helmholtz resonance chamber. L2 and d4 are the length and diameter of the Helmholtz oscillation chamber, respectively. These three parameters have an important influence on the performance of the Helmholtz resonance chamber. Therefore, designing an OH type compound oscillation nozzle is to continuously adjust and optimize these five parameters so that a better jet oscillation effect can be obtained. In order to process these nozzles more conveniently, the nozzle is machined in two parts during processing. The middle part is threaded and two different structural parts can be freely combined.
Referring to the theoretical analysis and experimental conditions [23], a basic OH nozzle form was designed, and its parameters are shown in Table 1. The nozzles used in the experiments were all obtained by changing the parameters on this nozzle. Except for the altered parameters, the other parameters were the same as those of the basic nozzles. These altered parameters were as follows. d1/d2 values were set to 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, and 3. Then, d2/d3 values were set to 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5, respectively. The values of L2 were set to 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm, respectively, and values of the cavity diameter d4 were 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mm, respectively. The nozzle inlet and outlet diameter ratios (d3/d5) were 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.5 respectively. Therefore, a total of ten organ nozzles and fifteen Helmholtz nozzles were processed. Their physical diagrams are shown in Figure 4.

3.2. Facilities and Setup

This experiment was carried out on a multi-functional high-pressure water jet test bench. The test bench is composed of four parts, a high-pressure piston pump set, a frequency conversion platform, a test bench, and a control platform. Each component performs unique functions. The experiment used a static pressure sensor to measure the nozzle inlet pressure. Besides, we independently designed a high-pressure water jet pressure test tank to accomplish the experiment. A target disk was mounted on the right side of the water tank, and a measuring hole of 1 mm in diameter was placed in the center of the target disk to measure the striking pressure of the jet center. The connection diagram of the experimental device is shown in Figure 5.
The experiment platform works by relying on two key lines, a water flow line and a signal flow line. The water flow line refers to the water passage during the experiment. The water passes through the high-pressure piston pump set through the high-pressure hose and the flow stabilizer to enter the horizontal rigid pipe. Then, it passes through the joint and ejects from the self-excited nozzle. After that, it hits the target on the right side of the tank through the submerged or non-submerged environment. Signal lines refer to the paths through which signals are collected during the experiment. Pressure sensors (Model: JXBS-3001-P304) and the data acquisition instrument (Model: QuantumX MX840B) are the most important components, the latter of which has a sampling frequency of more than 10,000 Hz. When the water flows through the connector and hits the target disk, the upper pressure sensor transmits the pressure signal to the computer through the data acquisition instrument for subsequent analysis and processing.
The following is a brief introduction to the relevant parameters and the working performance of each part. The high-pressure pump’s main function is to supply continuous and stable high pressure of water. It works with the frequency conversion platform, whose main function is to control the high-pressure piston pump’s speed by changing the frequency of the three-phase current. Therefore, the high-pressure pump was able to achieve smooth pressure conversion and provide specific pressure for the experiment. The test bench was the main operating area for the experiment, which can achieve changes in the target distance both in the horizontal and vertical directions. The movement accuracy is up to 0.1 mm, while the stroke in each direction is greater than 1 m. The control center is the platform for operating the bench. It can realize many functions, such as lifting and lowering the stage, driving the horizontal servo motor, setting the moving speed, and positioning of each moving part, which is the key part of the human–computer interaction of the whole system.
Five pressure drops (10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 MPa) were used to test the performance of the OH type self-excited oscillation nozzle. The experimental pressure range was 10–30 MPa and provided good pressure conditions and regions for optimizing the structural parameters of the oscillation nozzle. At each test, pressure measurements were taken at the nozzle inlet.
The impact pressure of the oscillating nozzle varies at different target distances. The target distance is defined as the distance between the nozzle outlet and the measurement target disk. According to the guiding experiment and the experience of self-excited oscillating jet nozzle research, the target distance of this experiment was set in the range of 10–100 mm, and it was regarded as a group every 10 mm.

3.3. Perturbation Elimination

In order to ensure the accuracy of such an experiment, the external influence factors should be reduced during the experiment. For example, in the experiment, the high-pressure piston pump set would inevitably have pulsation of flow and pressure during the working process. This pulsation has a relatively large influence on the pulsation generated by the self-excited nozzle, so two accumulators were provided in the high-pressure line. One of the accumulators is mounted close to the pump set and the other is mounted close to the nozzle. It has been estimated that the installation of the accumulator can reduce the pulsation in the pipeline by 80%.
Water head loss occurs when water passes through a high-pressure hose. In order to reduce the impact caused by head loss, a pressure sensor was provided at the joint where the nozzle was installed to monitor the pressure change of the high-pressure water entering the nozzle in real-time. After the pressure is stabilized, a good experimental result can be obtained.
Before measuring the impact pressure, alignment of the jet axis with the center of the target was performed. In order to make the center of the oscillating nozzle and the center of the target plate overlap as much as possible, the directions of stage y and z needed to be adjusted. After the axis was aligned, the data measured by the pressure sensor were regarded as the striking pressure at the center of the jet. In the experiment, the accuracy of the sensors was ≤0.25% FS (full scale), which meets the experimental requirements.

4. Results and Discussion

The pressure characteristics of the water jet determine its destructiveness and cutting effect. In this experiment, the pressure pulsation peak and amplitude of the OH self-excited oscillation nozzle were measured under different pump pressures. So the effects of different structural parameters on the pressure performance were analyzed.
Figure 6 shows the pressure curve measured by the sensor over a period of time. The experiment was carried out under these conditions: the target distance was 10 mm, pump pressure was 20 MPa, and the nozzle parameter was d1/d2 = 2.6. It can be seen that the pressure measured by the sensor changes over time. This indicates that the nozzle created a self-excited oscillation pulsed jet. It can be seen that the peak pressure is not constant during different periods of pressure change. In order to process data efficiently and accurately, the data is divided into series parts by time. Peak pressure is the maximum pressure during each period of time, while trough pressure is the minimum one. The pressure oscillation amplitude is defined as the difference between peak pressure and trough pressure measured at the jet axis in the same cycle during each period time. Then, the average value of the peak pressures for all stable periods of time is taken as the peak pressure of the nozzle. So does the pressure pulsation amplitude. Peak pressure and pressure oscillation amplitude can directly indicate the severity of jet pulsation. Therefore, this article uses these two indicators to evaluate nozzle performance.
The performance of the OH nozzle was compared with those of the organ-pipe nozzle and Helmholtz nozzle, and the geometric parameters of the OH nozzle are listed in Table 1. Figure 7 shows the comparison of the peak pressure and the pressure oscillation amplitude of the OH nozzle and the organ nozzle at different target distances under the condition of 30 MPa pressure. Obviously, the OH nozzle performs better than the organ nozzle or Helmholtz nozzle which makes it up. It can be seen that the peak pressure of the optimal OH nozzle would be about 8% higher than that of the organ nozzle or Helmholtz nozzle in the same pump pressure. The pressure pulsation amplitude is about 26% higher. This shows that the OH nozzle does achieve better self-oscillating jet performance.

4.1. The Effect of d1/d2 on Pressure Characteristics

Figure 8 shows the relationship between the peak pressure and pulsation amplitude on the jet axes of different nozzles as a function of the target distance. It can be seen that peak pressure decreases with increasing jet target distance. The overall trend of decreasing jet peak pressures is accordant, but the decreasing rate and peak value are different for different nozzles. When the pump pressure is 20 MPa, the nozzle with a d1/d2 of 2.6 has a peak pressure of 23.3 MPa at a 10 mm target distance. As the jet target distance increases, the peak pressure value of the pulsation decreases rapidly, while the downward trend slows down and approaches the level with the target distance exceeding 50 mm. Other nozzle peak pressures in the same group have the same trend, but the pressure pulsation peaks are smaller than this.
It has a complicated relationship between the pressure pulsation amplitude and the jet target distance. When the pressure changes, the change law of peak pressure and pulsation amplitude at different target distances are the same as when the pressure is 20 MPa. The maximal peak pressures of all the nozzles were measured at a 10 mm target distance, which is the smallest target distance measured in the experiment. However, the maximum pressure pulsation amplitudes were measured at a target distance of 20 mm.
The reason is that when the target distance is small, the time when the jet is ejected from the nozzle outlet to the contact with the sensor is too short. It will cause the pressure pulsation in the nozzle to not sufficiently develop. However, peak pressure will also be rapidly reduced when the target distance is too large. The jet is fully developed at the proper target distance, so the pressure amplitude is the largest at a certain target distance.
In fact, the variation law of the peak pressure and pulsation amplitude of different nozzles with the target distance in different pump pressures is similar in this experiment. Generally, the peak pressure is maximal at s = 10 mm and the pressure pulsation amplitude is maximal at s = 20 mm. The effect of the target distance will not be discussed later.
The maximal jet peak pressure and amplitude for different pump pressures are shown in Figure 9. They were measured at the target distance of 20 mm. It can be seen from the two pictures that the best oscillation nozzle structure is d1/d2 = 2.6. The reason is that d1/d2 of the OH nozzle determines the fluid velocity and reflected wave frequency of the jet entering the oscillating chamber of the organ pipe. Only when the reflected wave frequency is the same or close to the natural frequency of the structure, will the jet produce significant resonance and oscillation effects.

4.2. The Effects of d2/d3 on Pressure Characteristics

Figure 10 shows the peak pressures and pulsation amplitudes of different d2/d3 nozzles at the different target distances. Obviously, the change law here is similar to that discussed previously. It can be seen that the peak pressure is larger when d2/d3 is small. When d2/d3 increases, the performance of the nozzle will gradually deteriorate. Judging from the peak pressure, the performance of the nozzles is similar when d2/d3 is small. However, the variation law of pressure pulsation amplitude is different from that of peak pressure. When d2/d3 increases, pressure pulsation amplitude increases first and then decreases. Therefore, in comparison, d2/d3 = 2.5 is the best nozzle structure. Based on Figure 11, the conclusion that d2/d3 has a more pronounced effect on jet pressure pulsation can be drawn. When d2/d3 is small, the pressure pulsation amplitude is significantly smaller. The main reason for this phenomenon is that d2/d3 will affect the space reflected by the jet after it enters the resonance chamber of the organ pipe and contacts the lower collision wall. This means that inside the nozzle, d2/d3 has a major influence on the jet velocity.

4.3. The Effect of L2 on Pressure Characteristics

Figure 12 shows the peak pressures and pulsation amplitudes of different L2 nozzles at the different target distances. Their change law stays the same as the previous one. According to Figure 13, nozzle performance first becomes better as L2 increases, and then it deteriorates. It is obvious that L2 = 4 mm is the best parameter. Meanwhile, according to the curves, L2 = 6 mm nozzle also has relatively good performance when pump pressure is low. In fact, the best L2 will be slightly affected by pump pressure.
Surprisingly, it can be seen that the pressure pulsation amplitude of L2 = 6mm nozzle is slightly higher than that of 4 mm when the pump pressure is lower. But nozzle performance of L2 = 4 mm is much better than that of the nozzle of L2 = 6 mm with the pump pressure increasing. In other words, the comprehensive performance of L2 = 4 mm nozzle is still the best.
This is because the jet enters into the surrounding fluid in the chamber in the Helmholtz oscillation cavity, and a tiny vortex is continuously generated at the boundary layer. The jet exchanges energy with the environmental fluid, and the degree of turbulence in the cavity increases with the cavity length. At the same time, the feedback generated from the downstream collision wall also exacerbates the attenuation of the axial velocity. When the cavity length is long enough, the ordered vortex ring formed in the jet shear layer has sufficient space to develop. Therefore, the feedback from the downstream collision wall back to the upstream can also be well amplified, which plays an important role in modulating the jet. However, as the cavity length continues to increase, the fluid of the axial center exchanges energy with the surrounding environment, causing a large loss. When this loss is greater than the modulation, the peak pressure and amplitude will decay.
It can be seen from this that flow in the Helmholtz resonance chamber is more complicated than that in the organ pipe resonance chamber. Therefore, the influence of inlet pressure cannot be ignored when designing the Helmholtz oscillation cavity structure.

4.4. The Effect of d4 on Pressure Characteristics

Figure 14 shows the peak pressures and pulsation amplitudes of different d4 nozzles at the different target distances. Figure 15 shows the peak pressures and pulsation amplitudes of different d4 nozzles at different pressures. From the above peak pressure curves and pressure pulsation curves, it can be seen that the nozzle performance of d4 = 12 mm is better than that of d4 = 10mm when the pressure is low. However, with the pump pressure increasing, nozzle with d4 =10mm has a better performance. This indicates that in the OH type self-excited nozzle, the optimal d4 structure of the nozzle is extremely sensitive to changes in pressure.
For the Helmholtz nozzle, the vortex ring modulation coupling of the downstream collision wall feedback is mainly affected by d4. If the cavity diameter is too small, the jet will form a reflux vortex when it engulfs the surrounding fluid in the chamber and cannot be fully developed. This causes the chamber wall to be subjected to limited compression against the backflow of the chamber, resulting in increased energy consumption. If the cavity diameter is too large, the vortex is fully developed and the return flow is away from the jet axis, and the axial jet cannot be effectively modulated and coupled. So d4 = 12 mm nozzles have better performance when the pressure is lower. When the pressure is 20 MPa or more, the pulsation amplitude of the pressure produces a maximum at d4 = 10 mm.

4.5. The Effect of d3/d5 on Pressure Characteristics

Figure 16 shows the effects of d3/d5 on the peak pressure and pressure pulsation amplitude of the OH self-excited pulse nozzle at the different target distances. Figure 17 shows the effect of d3/d5 on the peak pressure and pressure pulsation amplitude of the OH self-excited pulse nozzle at different pressures. As can be seen from the two pictures, the jet peak pressure increases as the nozzle diameter increases at first, and then decreases. When the nozzle diameter ratio value is 1.0, the jet pulsation peak is the largest. The pressure pulsation amplitude of the jet shows a more sensitive change. When d3/d5 value is 0.5, the pressure pulsation amplitude is almost 5 MPa or less and keeps steady with the pump pressure’s increases. It indicates that the fluid does not oscillate when passing through the nozzle at such a time. As d3/d5 increases, the oscillation effect generated by the nozzle increases, reaching a maximum value when d3/d5 is 1.0.
When d3/d5 is small, only the innermost layer of the jet core zone can be ejected outward through the nozzle outlet. Most of the jets will only reciprocate continuously in the oscillating chamber, so it is almost impossible to form an oscillating jet. When d3/d5 is too large, the fluid in contact with the collision wall at the periphery of the jet is small, and the oscillation effect generated when propagating upward is insufficient to modulate the core region of the jet. Therefore, no obvious oscillating jets will form in this case.

5. Conclusions

OH nozzles (organ–Helmholtz nozzles) are novel self-oscillation nozzles. They do not just connect an organ-pipe nozzle and a Helmholtz nozzle together. They combine the two kinds of ordinary nozzles, and the synergistic effect of OH nozzles makes pressure fluctuations of self-excited jets more obvious. In this paper, the pressure oscillation characteristics of OH nozzles were investigated, and the conclusions were obtained as follows:
(1) Both the jet peak pressure and the pressure pulsation amplitude are positively correlated with the pump pressure. The jet peak pressure is inversely related to the target distance. As the target distance increases, the peak pressure first decreases sharply, and then decreases slowly. As the target distance increases, the pressure pulsation amplitude increases at first, and then decreases. Therefore, there is an optimum target distance, which is 20 mm in the experiment.
(2) Some of the optimal parameters of the OH nozzle are not sensitive to pressure. In this experiment, the performance of that nozzle regarding those parameters was the best regardless of the change in pressure. These parameters may be related to the initial perturbation vortex formation. The optimal parameters are d1/d2 = 2.6, d2/d3 = 2.5, and d3/d5 = 1.
(3) The optimum ranges of L2 and d4 are affected by pressure. They are closely related to the development of disturbance waves, and the oscillation pulsed jet can enhance and develop only in appropriate situations. L2 is relatively lightly affected by pressure. L2 = 6 mm has good performance when the pump pressure is low. When the pressure is increased, L2 = 4 mm performs better. Similarly, d4 = 12 mm performs well when the pressure is low. When the pressure exceeds 20 MPa, d4 = 10 mm performs better.

Author Contributions

X.W., Y.H., and X.D. conceived and designed the schemes; Y.L. and M.X. performed the experiments; Y.L. and D.L. analyzed the data; M.X. and Y.L. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 51804318 and number 51805188), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (number 2018YFC0808401).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

fnatural frequency of organ-pipe nozzle (Hz)
cwave velocity (m/s)
St*critical Strouhal number
d3diameter of organ-pipe nozzle outlet (mm)
MaMach number
d4Helmholtz cavity diameter (mm)
Vvolume of organ-pipe chamber (m3)
d1diameter of organ-pipe nozzle inlet (mm)
StStrouhal number
Nmode number
KNcoefficient
L1length of oscillation cavity (mm)
f*critical oscillation frequency (Hz)
vjet velocity (m/s)
S*LStrouhal number based on the cavity length
L2cavity length (mm)
d2diameter of organ-pipe nozzle resonance chamber (mm)
d5diameter of Helmholtz nozzle outlet (mm)
nnumber of vortex

References

  1. Hu, Y.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.C.; Li, X.H.; Long, X.P.; Zhai, G.Y.; Huang, M. Mechanism and experimental investigation of ultra high pressure water jet on rubber cutting. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2014, 15, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kohan, O.; Bienen, B.; Gaudin, C.; Cassidy, M.J. The effect of water jetting onspudcan extraction from deep embedment in soft clay. Ocean Eng. 2015, 97, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soyama, H. Improvement of fatigue strength by using cavitating jets in air and water. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 6638–6641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, B.Q.; Yan, F.Z.; Zhu, C.J.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, Q.L.; Guo, C.; Liu, T. Cross-borehole hydraulic slotting technique for preventing and controlling coal and gas outbursts during coal roadway excavation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 26, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, W.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.; Yuan, B.; Fang, Z. Forming mechanism and radius prediction of hydraulically generated slots based on a two-walled jet. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 36, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hou, R.; Wang, T.; Lv, Z.; Tian, Y. Investigation of the pulsed waterjet flow field inside and outside of the nozzle excited by ultrasonic vibration. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 99, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alberdi, A.; Artaza, T.; Suarez, A.; Rivero, A.; Girot, F. An experimental study on abrasive waterjet cutting of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks for drilling operations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 86, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, W.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Q.; Fang, Z. Integrated CFD-aided theoretical demonstration of cavitation modulation in self-sustained oscillating jets. Appl. Math. Model. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bo, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhou, W. Research on the law of rock breaking by rotating jet. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2003, 22, 664. [Google Scholar]
  10. Samson, T.; MacDonald, D.; Fernandez, R.; Jodoin, B. Effect of Pulsed Waterjet Surface Preparation on the Adhesion Strength of Cold Gas Dynamic Sprayed Aluminum Coatings. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2015, 24, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dehkhoda, S.; Bourne, N.K. Production of a high-velocity water slug using an impacting technique. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 025109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lehocka, D.; Klich, J.; Foldyna, J.; Hloch, S.; Krolczyk, J.B.; Carach, J.; Krolczyk, G.M. Copper alloys disintegration using pulsating water jet. Measurement 2016, 82, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, Q.J.; Xue, L.; Kim, K.Y.; Shi, Z.F. Multi-objective optimization of a flow straightener in a large capacity firefighting water cannon. J. Hydrodyn. 2019, 31, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liao, Z.; Tang, C. Theoretical analysis of self-excited oscillating pulse jet nozzle. J. Chongqing Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2002, 02, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghadi, S.; Esmailpour, K.; Hosseinalipour, S.M.; Mujumdar, A. Experimental study of formation and development of coherent vortical structures in pulsed turbulent impinging jet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2016, 74, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, X.; Kang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Zeng, D. Experimental investigation on surface quality processed by self-excited oscillation pulsed waterjet peening. Materials 2017, 10, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, M.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Cai, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. Experimental investigation on the rock erosion characteristics of a self-excited oscillation pulsed supercritical CO2 jet. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 139, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johnson, V.E., Jr.; Lindenmuth, W.T.; Conn, A.F.; Frederick, G.S. Feasibility Study of Tuned-Resonator, Pulsating Cavitating Water Jet for Deep-Hole Drilling; SAND 81-7126; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, USA; Hydronautics, Inc.: Laurel, MD, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, J.V.E.; Chahine, G.L.; Lindenmuth, W.T.; Conn, A.F.; Frederick, G.S.; Giacchino, J.G.J. Cavitating and Structured Jets for Mechanical Bits to Increase Drilling Rate—Part I: Theory and Concepts. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 1984, 106, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chahine, G.L.; Johnson, V.E.; Lindenmuth, W.T.; Frederick, G.S. The use of self-resonating cavitating water jets for underwater sound generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985, 77, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chahine, G.; Genoux, P.; Johnson, V.E., Jr.; Frederick, G.S. Analytical and Experimental Study of the Acoustics and the Flow Field Characteristics of Cavitating Self-Resonating Water Jets; Tracor Hydronautics, Inc.: Laurel, MD, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, D.; Kang, Y.; Ding, X.L.; Wang, X.C.; Fang, Z.L. Effects of area discontinuity at nozzle inlet on the characteristics of high speed self-excited oscillation pulsed waterjets. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2016, 79, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, D.; Kang, Y.; Ding, X.L.; Liu, W.C. Experimental study on the effects of feeding pipe diameter on the cavitation erosion performance of self-resonating cavitating waterjet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 82, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tuna, B.A.; Rockwell, D. Self-sustained oscillations of shallow flow past sequential cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 2014, 758, 655–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilson, T.A.; Beavers, G.S.; DeCoster, M.A.; Holger, D.K.; Regenfuss, M.D. Experiments on the Fluid Mechanics of Whistling. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1971, 50, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Crow, S.C.; Champagne, F.H. Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1971, 48, 547–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rockwell, D.; Naudascher, E. Self-Sustained Oscillations of Impinging Free Shear Layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1979, 11, 67–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morel, T. Experimental Study of a Jet-Driven Helmholtz Oscillator. J. Fluids Eng. 1979, 101, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geveci, M.; Oshkai, P.; Rockwell, D.; Lin, J.C.; Pollack, M. Imaging of the self-excited oscillation of flow past a cavity during generation of a flow tone. J. Fluids Struct. 2003, 18, 665–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kolsek, T.; Jelic, N.; Duhovnik, J. Numerical study of flow asymmetry and self-sustained jet oscillations in geometrically symmetric cavities. Appl. Math. Model. 2007, 31, 2355–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, R.L.; Slaboch, P.E.; Morris, S.C. Fluid mechanics of the flow-excited Helmholtz resonator. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 623, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, D.; Li, X.H.; Tang, C.L.; Kang, Y. Analytical and experimental investigations of the pulsed air-water jet. J. Fluids Struct. 2015, 54, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hlaváč, L.M. System of chambers for activation of modulation or pulsation in water jets. In Proceedings of the 2007 American WJTA Conference and Expo, Houston, TX, USA, 19–21 August 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mgr. Zuzana Šimonovská, LL.M., advokát. Device to Create and Intensify Modulation of Liquid Flow Velocity. P. Česká Republika Patent 302595, 27 July 2011.
  35. Li, G.; Shen, Z. Design principle of self-vibrating cavitation nozzle for organ pipe. J. Pet. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 1992, 5, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Structure diagram of an organ nozzle.
Figure 1. Structure diagram of an organ nozzle.
Energies 13 00367 g001
Figure 2. Structure diagram of a Helmholtz nozzle.
Figure 2. Structure diagram of a Helmholtz nozzle.
Energies 13 00367 g002
Figure 3. The structure diagram of organ–Helmholtz (OH) self-excited oscillation nozzle.
Figure 3. The structure diagram of organ–Helmholtz (OH) self-excited oscillation nozzle.
Energies 13 00367 g003
Figure 4. The physical diagram of OH self-excited oscillation nozzle.
Figure 4. The physical diagram of OH self-excited oscillation nozzle.
Energies 13 00367 g004
Figure 5. Connection diagram of the device.
Figure 5. Connection diagram of the device.
Energies 13 00367 g005
Figure 6. Pressure fluctuations during a period of time.
Figure 6. Pressure fluctuations during a period of time.
Energies 13 00367 g006
Figure 7. Performance comparison of three nozzles: (a). Comparison of pressure peaks at different axis target distances. (b). Comparison of pressure oscillation amplitude at different axis target distances.
Figure 7. Performance comparison of three nozzles: (a). Comparison of pressure peaks at different axis target distances. (b). Comparison of pressure oscillation amplitude at different axis target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g007
Figure 8. Effect of d1/d2 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d1/d2 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d1/d2 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Figure 8. Effect of d1/d2 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d1/d2 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d1/d2 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g008
Figure 9. Performance of different d1/d2 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d1/d2 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d1/d2 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Figure 9. Performance of different d1/d2 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d1/d2 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d1/d2 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Energies 13 00367 g009
Figure 10. Effect of d2/d3 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d2/d3 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d2/d3 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Figure 10. Effect of d2/d3 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d2/d3 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d2/d3 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g010
Figure 11. Performance of different d2/d3 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d2/d3 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d2/d3 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Figure 11. Performance of different d2/d3 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d2/d3 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d2/d3 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Energies 13 00367 g011
Figure 12. Effect of L2 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different L2 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different L2 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Figure 12. Effect of L2 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different L2 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different L2 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g012
Figure 13. Performance of different L2 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different L2 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different L2 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Figure 13. Performance of different L2 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different L2 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different L2 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Energies 13 00367 g013
Figure 14. Effect of d4 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d4 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d4 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Figure 14. Effect of d4 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d4 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d4 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g014
Figure 15. Performance of different d4 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d4 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d4 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Figure 15. Performance of different d4 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d4 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d4 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Energies 13 00367 g015
Figure 16. Effect of d3/d5 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d3/d5 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d3/d5 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Figure 16. Effect of d3/d5 on nozzle performance at 20 MPa pressure. (a). curves of nozzles with different d3/d5 on pressure pulsation amplitude at different target distances. (b). curves of nozzles with different d3/d5 on pressure oscillation peak at different target distances.
Energies 13 00367 g016
Figure 17. Performance of different d3/d5 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d3/d5 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d3/d5 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Figure 17. Performance of different d3/d5 nozzles under each pump pressure. (a). maximal jet pressure pulsation amplitudes of different d3/d5 nozzles. (b). maximal jet peak pressures of different d3/d5 nozzles at each pump pressure.
Energies 13 00367 g017
Table 1. Parameters of the basic nozzle.
Table 1. Parameters of the basic nozzle.
d1d2d3d4d5L1L2
13 mm6 mm2 mm10 mm2 mm21 mm6 mm

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Ding, X.; Xiang, M.; Li, D. An Experimental Study on the Jet Pressure Performance of Organ–Helmholtz (O-H), Self-Excited Oscillating Nozzles. Energies 2020, 13, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020367

AMA Style

Wang X, Li Y, Hu Y, Ding X, Xiang M, Li D. An Experimental Study on the Jet Pressure Performance of Organ–Helmholtz (O-H), Self-Excited Oscillating Nozzles. Energies. 2020; 13(2):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaochuan, Yueqin Li, Yi Hu, Xiaolong Ding, Meijing Xiang, and Deng Li. 2020. "An Experimental Study on the Jet Pressure Performance of Organ–Helmholtz (O-H), Self-Excited Oscillating Nozzles" Energies 13, no. 2: 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop