# A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Analysis of West Texas Intermediate Oil Prices and the DOW JONES Index

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{5}

^{6}

^{7}

^{8}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. The Links between Oil Prices and Stock Markets

## 3. Econometric Model—The Nardl Approach

## 4. Results of the Analysis

#### 4.1. Preliminary Analysis

#### 4.2. Nardl Analysis

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Shin, Y.; Yu, B.; Greenwood-Nimmo, M. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In The Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt.: Econometric Methods and Applications; Horrace, W., Sickles, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 281–314. [Google Scholar]
- Zaghdoudi, T. nardl: Nonlinear Cointegrating Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model; R Package Version 0.1.5; 2018; Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nardl (accessed on 12 December 2019).
- Philips, A.Q. Have Your Cake and Eat It Too? Cointegration and dynamic inference from Autoregressive Distributed Lag Models. Am. J. Political Sci.
**2018**, 62, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Philips, A.Q. pss: Perform Bounds Test for Cointegration and Perform Dynamic Simulations; R Package Version 0.1.3.9000; 2016; Available online: http://andyphilips.github.io/pssbounds/ (accessed on 12 December 2019).
- Dickey, D.A.; Fuller, W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
**1979**, 74, 427–431. [Google Scholar] - Engle, R.F.; Granger, C.W.J. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica
**1987**, 55, 251–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Johansen, S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control
**1988**, 12, 231–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Phillips, P.C.B.; Hansen, B. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud.
**1990**, 57, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P.C.B.; Schmidt, P.; Shin, Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J. Econom.
**1992**, 54, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Park, J.Y.; Phillips, P.C.B. Nonlinear regressions with integrated time series. Econometrica
**2001**, 69, 117–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chang, Y.; Park, J.Y.; Phillips, P.C.B. Nonlinear econometric models with cointegrated and deterministically trending regressors. Econom. J.
**2001**, 4, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beirens, H.J.; Martins, L.F. Time-varying cointegration. Econom. Theory
**2010**, 26, 1453–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Park, J.Y.; Hahn, S.B. Cointegrating regressions with time-varying coefficients. Econom. Theory
**1999**, 15, 664–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hamilton, J.D. What is an oil shock? J. Econom.
**2003**, 113, 363–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balke, N.S.; Fomby, T.B. Threshold cointegration. Int. Econ. Rev.
**1997**, 38, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Psaradakis, Z.; Sola, M.; Spagnolo, F. On Markov error-correction models with an application to stock prices and dividends. J. Appl. Econom.
**2004**, 19, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kapetanios, G.; Shin, Y.; Snell, A. Testing for cointegration in nonlinear smooth transition error correction models. Econom. Theory
**2006**, 22, 279–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Schorderet, Y. Revisiting Okun’s Law: An Hysteretic Perspective; University of California San Diego: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Schorderet, Y. Asymmetric Cointegration; University of Geneva: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Granger, C.W.J.; Yoon, G. Hidden Cointegration; University of California San Diego: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y.; Smith, R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom.
**2001**, 16, 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Treeck, T. Asymmetric Income and Wealth Effects in a Non-Linear Error Correction Model of US Consumer Spending; Working Paper No. 6/2008; Macroeconomic Policy Institute in the Hans-Bockler Foundation: Dusseldorf, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kling, J.L. Oil price shocks and stock-market behavior. J. Portf. Manag.
**1985**, 12, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, N.-R.; Roll, R.; Ross, S.A. Economic forces and the stock market. J. Bus.
**1986**, 59, 383–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jones, C.; Kaul, G. Oil and the stock markets. J. Financ.
**1986**, 51, 463–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Huang, R.; Masulis, R.; Stoll, H. Energy shocks and financial markets. J. Futur. Mark.
**1996**, 16, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wei, C. Energy, the stock market, and the putty-clay investment model. Am. Econ. Rev.
**2003**, 93, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kilian, L.; Vigfusson, R.J. Are the resonses of the U.S. economy asymmetric in energy price increases and decreases? Quant. Econ.
**2011**, 2, 419–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kilian, L.; Park, C. The impact of oil price shocks on the US stock market. Int. Econ. Rev.
**2009**, 50, 1267–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jordan, S.; Philips, A.Q. pss: Perform Bounds Test for Cointegration and Perform Dynamic Simulations; R Package Version 0.1.3.9000; 2016; Available online: https://github.com/andyphilips/pss (accessed on 12 December 2019).
- Ryan, J.A.; Ulrich, J.M. Quantmod: Quantitative Financial Modelling Framework; R Package Version 0.4-15; 2019; Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantmod (accessed on 12 December 2019).
- Bai, J.; Perron, P. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. J. Appl. Econom.
**2003**, 18, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Hurst, H.E. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.
**1951**, 116, 770–799. [Google Scholar] - Jiang, H.; Skoulakis, G.; Xue, J. Oil and Equity Return Predictability: The Importance of Dissecting Oil Price Changes; Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS 2822061; 2018; Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2822061 (accessed on 12 December 2019).
- Kilian, L. Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. Am. Rev.
**2009**, 99, 1053–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Caldara, D.; Cavallo, M.; Iacoviello, M. Oil price elasticities and oil price fluctuations, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board. J. Monet. Econ.
**2019**, 103, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]

**Figure 1.**Plots of real values of Dow Jones Index and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Crude Oil Index.

Table 1A: Real Monthly Value of Dow Jones Index. | |||

Summary Statistics, 2000:02–2019:02 | |||

for RDOW (228 valid observations) | |||

Mean | Median | Minimum | Maximum |

62.179 | 57.520 | 33.205 | 105.07 |

Std. Dev. | C.V. | Skewness | Ex. kurtosis |

15.061 | 0.24221 | 1.0567 | 0.74540 |

5% perc. | 95% perc. | IQ Range | Missing obs. |

42.976 | 97.810 | 16.672 | 1 |

Table 1B: Real Monthly Value of WTI Crude Oil Index. | |||

Summary Statistics, 2000:02–2019:02 | |||

for RWTI (228 valid observations) | |||

Mean | Median | Minimum | Maximum |

0.28619 | 0.27188 | 0.10930 | 0.61564 |

Std. Dev. | C.V. | Skewness | Ex. kurtosis |

0.11102 | 0.38791 | 0.45737 | −0.65485 |

5% perc. | 95% perc. | IQ Range | Missing obs. |

0.14651 | 0.45587 | 0.19142 | 1 |

ADF Test with Constant | ADF Test with Constant and Trend | |
---|---|---|

RDOW | 0.319565 (0.98) | −1.45083 (0.84) |

LRTWI | −2.71641 (0.07) | −2.65379 (0.26) |

Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Ratio | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Test with constant | ||||

Constant | 67.37 | 2.76 | 24.45 | 0.00 |

LRTWI | −18.14 | 8.97 | −2.02 | 0.044 |

Test for unit root residuals | −0.45 | 0.97 | ||

Test with Constant and Trend | ||||

Constant | 55.10 | 1.90 | 28.93 | 0.00 |

LRTWI | −47–49 | 6.01 | −7.9 | 0.00 |

Time | 0.18 | 0.01 | 17.83 | 0.00 |

Test for unit root residuals | −2.36 | 0.60 |

ESTIMATES | LONG RUN COEFFICIENTS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Coefficients | Estimate | St.Error | tValue | Estimate | St.Error | tValue |

Const | 3.42705 | 1.01640 | 3.372 *** | |||

RDOW_1 | −0.05658 | 0.01726 | −3.277 *** | |||

LRTWI_p_1 | −2.27671 | 1.79029 | −1.272 | −40.2408 | 12.2512 | −3.2846 *** |

LRTWI_n_1 | −3.98850 | 1.96948 | −2.025 *** | −70.4967 | 21.4666 | −3.2840 *** |

D.RDOW_1 | −0.05659 | 0.06823 | −0.830 | −1.0003 | 0.3054 | −3.2745 *** |

D.RDOW_2 | −0.12431 | 0.06922 | −1.796 * | −2.1971 | 0.670542 | −3.2767 *** |

D.RDOW_3 | −0.05703 | 0.07173 | −0.795 | −1.0079 | 0.3078 | −3.2745 *** |

D.RDOW_4 | 0.01684 | 0.07198 | 0.234 | 0.2977 | 0.0907 | 3.2793 *** |

D.LRTWI_p_1 | 4.70325 | 14.50059 | 0.324 | 83.1301 | 25.4168 | 3.2707 *** |

D.LRTWI_p_2 | −25.00977 | 14.34213 | −1.744 * | −442.0481 | 134.8485 | −3.2781 *** |

D.LRTWI_p_3 | −15.05225 | 14.44845 | −1.042 | −266.0488 | 81.1257 | −3.2795 *** |

D.LRTWI_p_4 | −30.79094 | 14.43954 | −2.132 ** | −544.2303 | 165.9888 | −3.2787 *** |

D.LRTWI_n_1 | 6.27525 | 11.65583 | 0.538 | 110.9151 | 33.8112 | 3.2804 *** |

D.LRTWI_n_2 | 21.93929 | 12.40570 | 1.768 * | 387.7773 | 118.2812 | 3.2784 *** |

D.LRTWI_n_3 | 2.36444 | 12.75230 | 0.185 | 41.7916 | 12.6578 | 3.3016 *** |

D.LRTWI_n_4 | 20.18801 | 11.87684 | 1.700 * | 356.8234 | 108.7410 | 3.2814 *** |

Adjusted R-Squared | 0.06617 | |||||

F-statistic | 2.044 ** | |||||

Model Diagnostic tests | ||||||

JB test | 41.50852 *** | |||||

LM test ( 4 lags ) | 1.587934 | |||||

ARCH test (4 lags) | 8.74709 | |||||

Long-Run Asymmetry test | ||||||

F. Statistic | 17.9658 *** |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Allen, D.E.; McAleer, M.
A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Analysis of West Texas Intermediate Oil Prices and the DOW JONES Index. *Energies* **2020**, *13*, 4011.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13154011

**AMA Style**

Allen DE, McAleer M.
A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Analysis of West Texas Intermediate Oil Prices and the DOW JONES Index. *Energies*. 2020; 13(15):4011.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13154011

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Allen, David E., and Michael McAleer.
2020. "A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Analysis of West Texas Intermediate Oil Prices and the DOW JONES Index" *Energies* 13, no. 15: 4011.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13154011