Next Article in Journal
Combustion Analysis of a Diesel Engine during Warm up at Different Coolant and Lubricating Oil Temperatures
Previous Article in Journal
Waste Management and Prediction of Air Pollutants Using IoT and Machine Learning Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Is Mortality Affected by Fossil Fuel Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Factors in CIS Region?
Open AccessArticle

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Bottlenecks: Prioritization of Targets for Climate Liability

1
Environmental & Energy Policy, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 4993, USA
2
Department of Material Science & Engineering and Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(15), 3932; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153932
Received: 18 June 2020 / Revised: 16 July 2020 / Accepted: 30 July 2020 / Published: 1 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Policy and Negative Emissions Technologies)
Due to market failures that allow uncompensated negative externalities from burning fossil fuels, there has been a growing call for climate change-related litigation targeting polluting companies. To determine the most intensive carbon dioxide (CO2)-emitting facilities in order prioritize liability for climate lawsuits, and risk mitigation strategies for identified companies as well as their insurers and investors, two methods are compared: (1) the conventional point-source method and (2) the proposed bottleneck method, which considers all emissions that a facility enables rather than only what it emits. Results indicate that the top ten CO2 emission bottlenecks in the U.S. are predominantly oil (47%) and natural gas (44%) pipelines. Compared to traditional point-source emissions methods, this study has demonstrated that a comprehensive bottleneck calculation is more effective. By employing an all-inclusive approach to calculating a polluting entity’s CO2 emissions, legal actions may be more accurately focused on major polluters, and these companies may preemptively mitigate their pollution to curb vulnerability to litigation and risk. The bottleneck methodology reveals the discrete link in the chain of the fossil-fuel lifecycle that is responsible for the largest amount of emissions, enabling informed climate change mitigation and risk management efforts. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy policy; greenhouse gas liability; climate change liability; risk analysis; risk management; climate governance; climate change; corporate environmental responsibility; climate lawsuits; carbon dioxide emissions energy policy; greenhouse gas liability; climate change liability; risk analysis; risk management; climate governance; climate change; corporate environmental responsibility; climate lawsuits; carbon dioxide emissions
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pascaris, A.S.; Pearce, J.M. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Bottlenecks: Prioritization of Targets for Climate Liability. Energies 2020, 13, 3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153932

AMA Style

Pascaris AS, Pearce JM. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Bottlenecks: Prioritization of Targets for Climate Liability. Energies. 2020; 13(15):3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pascaris, Alexis S.; Pearce, Joshua M. 2020. "U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Bottlenecks: Prioritization of Targets for Climate Liability" Energies 13, no. 15: 3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153932

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop