Next Article in Journal
Decision Tree for Online Voltage Stability Margin Assessment Using C4.5 and Relief-F Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Groove Method to Suppress Stall in Pump Turbine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Turkey
2
Department of Energy Engineering, Yasar University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(15), 3823; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153823
Submission received: 7 July 2020 / Revised: 23 July 2020 / Accepted: 24 July 2020 / Published: 25 July 2020

Abstract

This research put forth exergy-based economic and sustainability analyses of a (J85-GE-5H) military turbojet engine (TJE). Firstly, sustainability, conventional exergoeconomic and advanced exergoeconomic cost analyses were executed utilizing kerosene fuel according to real engine working circumstances. The engine was likewise investigated parametrically, considering H2 fuel utilization. The sustainable economic analysis assessment of the TJE was finally actualized by comparing the acquired outcomes for both fuels. The entire engine’s unit exergy cost of product (cPr) with kerosene was determined 76.45 $/GJ for the military (MIL) process mode (PM), whereas it was computed 94.97 $/GJ for the afterburner (AB) PM. Given the use of H2, the cPr increased to 179 and 288 $/GJ for the aforementioned two modes, seriatim. While the sustainability cost index (SCI) values were obtained 52.86 and 78.84 $/GJ for the MIL and AB PM, seriatim, they became 128 and 244 $/GJ when considering H2. Consequently, the higher exergy demolitions occurring in the afterburner exhaust duct (ABED) and combustion chamber (CC) sections led to higher exergy destruction costs in the TJE. However, the engine worked less cost efficient with H2 fuel rather than JP-8 fuel because of the higher cost value of fuel.
Keywords: turbojet engine; sustainability analysis; performance assessment; advanced exergoeconomic analysis; H2 fuel; cost effectiveness turbojet engine; sustainability analysis; performance assessment; advanced exergoeconomic analysis; H2 fuel; cost effectiveness
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuksel, B.; Gunerhan, H.; Hepbasli, A. Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels. Energies 2020, 13, 3823. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153823

AMA Style

Yuksel B, Gunerhan H, Hepbasli A. Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels. Energies. 2020; 13(15):3823. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153823

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuksel, Burak, Huseyin Gunerhan, and Arif Hepbasli. 2020. "Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels" Energies 13, no. 15: 3823. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153823

APA Style

Yuksel, B., Gunerhan, H., & Hepbasli, A. (2020). Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels. Energies, 13(15), 3823. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153823

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop