Short-Term Load Forecasting with Tensor Partial Least Squares-Neural Network
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Proposed Method
3. Brief Introduction of Comparative Models
3.1. PLS
3.2. LSSVM
3.3. NN
4. Forecast Results and Discussion
4.1. Data Interpretation
4.2. Load Forecasting
4.3. Daily Load Peak Forecasting
4.4. Discussion of the Results
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hu, R.; Wen, S.; Zeng, Z.; Huang, T. A short-term power load forecasting model based on the generalized regression neural network with decreasing step fruit fly optimization algorithm. Neurocomputing 2017, 221, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, H.; Srinivasan, D.; Khosravi, A. Short-term load and wind power forecasting using neural network-based prediction intervals. IEEE Trans.Neural Netw. Learn. 2014, 25, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monteiro, C.; Ramirez-Rosado, I.J.; Fernandez-Jimenez, L.A.; Ribeiro, M. New probabilistic price forecasting models: Application to the Iberian electricity market. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 103, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Meer, D.W.; Munkhammar, J.; Widen, J. Probabilistic forecasting of solar power, electricity consumption and net load: Investigating the effect of seasons, aggregation and penetration on prediction intervals. Sol. Energy 2018, 171, 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolda, T.G.; Bader, B.W. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev. 2009, 51, 455–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.M.; Yan, Y.; Wang, H.Z. Discriminative weighted sparse partial least squares for human detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Trans. Syst. 2016, 17, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, B.; Wang, J.; Zhou, J.; Wu, H.; Jin, Q. Quality-related statistical process monitoring method based on global and local partial least-squares projection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 1609–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattori, Y.; Otsuka, M. Modeling of feed-forward control using the partial least squares regression method in the tablet compression process. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 524, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, J.; Huang, D.; He, H.B.; Zhou, W.; Han, Q.; Li, T.F. A novel framework for fault diagnosis using kernel partial least squares based on an optimal preference matrix. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 64, 4315–4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Letexier, D.; Bourennane, S.; Talon, J.B. Nonorthogonal tensor matricization for hyperspectral image filtering. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008, 5, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, G.X.; Zhao, Q.B.; Zhang, Y.; Adali, T.; Xie, S.L.; Cichocki, A. Linked component analysis from matrices to high-order tensors: Applications to biomedical data. Proc. IEEE 2016, 104, 310–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Lathauwer, L. Decompositions of a higher-order tensor in block terms-part II: Definitions and uniqueness. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 2008, 30, 1033–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.B.; Caiafa, C.F.; Mandic, D.P.; Chao, Z.C.; Nagasaka, Y.; Fujii, N.; Zhang, L.Q.; Cichocki, A. Higher order partial least squares (HOPLS): A generalized multilinear regression method. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013, 35, 1660–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eliseyev, A.; Auboiroux, V.; Costecalde, T.; Langar, L.; Charvet, G.; Mestais, C.; Aksenova, T.; Benabid, A.L. Recursive exponentially weighted N-way partial least squares regression with recursive-validation of hyper-parameters in brain-computer interface applications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hervas, D.; Prats-Montalban, J.M.; Lahoz, A.; Ferrer, A. Sparse N-way partial least squares with R package sNPLS. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2018, 179, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Yan, X.; Yang, S.; Ren, H.; Ge, S.S. Low-cost pyrometry system with nonlinear multisense partial least squares. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2018, 48, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, G.; Chen, C.L.P.; Liu, Y.J.; Liu, Z. Neural network-based adaptive leader-following consensus control for a class of nonlinear multiagent state-delay systems. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2017, 47, 2151–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, C.; Zhang, L.; Guan, X. Distributed adaptive neural network output tracking of leader-following high-order stochastic nonlinear multiagent systems with unknown dead-zone input. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2017, 47, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, W.; Chen, Y.; Yin, Z. Adaptive neural network control of an uncertain robot with full-state constraints. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2016, 46, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.J.; Li, J.; Tong, S.; Chen, C.L.P. Neural network control-based adaptive learning design for nonlinear systems with full-state constraints. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. 2016, 27, 1562–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.L.P.; Liu, Y.J.; Wen, G.X. Fuzzy neural network-based adaptive control for a class of uncertain nonlinear stochastic systems. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2014, 44, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, C.L.; Hung, J.Y. Adaptive recurrent neural network enhanced variable structure control for nonlinear discrete MIMO systems. Asian J. Control 2018, 20, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Wang, D.; Zhao, D.; Wei, Q.; Jin, N. Neural-network-based optimal control for a class of unknown discrete-time nonlinear systems using globalized dual heuristic programming. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2012, 9, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoang, N.D.; Bui, D.T. Predicting earthquake-induced soil liquefaction based on a hybridization of kernel fisher discriminant analysis and a least squares support vector machine: a multi-dataset study. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2018, 77, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.H.; Shen, H. Grey-related least squares support vector machine optimization model and its application in predicting natural gas consumption demand. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2018, 338, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Tang, L.X.; Liu, J.Y. Least squares support vector machine with self-organizing multiple kernel learning and sparsity. Neurocomputing 2019, 331, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.; Tezcan, J.; Cheng, J. Confidence and prediction intervals for semiparametric mixed-effect least squares support vector machine. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2014, 40, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taubenschuss, U.; Santolik, O. Wave polarization analyzed by singular value decomposition of the spectral matrix in the presence of noise. Surv. Geophys. 2019, 40, 39–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Liu, T.; Wu, X.; Chen, Q. Research on bearing fault feature extraction based on singular value decomposition and optimized frequency band entropy. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 118, 477–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitton, G.; Heltai, L. Accelerating the iterative solution of convection-diffusion problems using singular value decomposition. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2018, 26, e2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, J.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, D.; Bao, H. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between temperature and power load. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 986–987, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Z. The effect of meteorology factors on power load in high-temperature seasons. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 1008–1009, 796–799. [Google Scholar]
Model | PLS | LSSVM | NN | TPN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hour | |||||
1 | 60.60 | 101.00 | 58.74 | 42.55 | |
2 | 60.80 | 99.00 | 76.57 | 42.61 | |
3 | 61.29 | 96.42 | 75.84 | 43.21 | |
4 | 62.27 | 94.80 | 97.88 | 44.94 | |
5 | 72.05 | 100.42 | 145.19 | 53.20 | |
6 | 103.49 | 135.77 | 126.02 | 78.61 | |
7 | 150.29 | 201.60 | 175.71 | 121.09 | |
8 | 175.88 | 226.68 | 182.10 | 146.10 | |
9 | 172.24 | 210.88 | 226.69 | 142.99 | |
10 | 186.62 | 207.55 | 246.46 | 141.62 | |
11 | 199.03 | 220.66 | 190.12 | 150.84 | |
12 | 211.25 | 236.84 | 206.86 | 158.24 |
Model | PLS | LSSVM | NN | TPN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hour | |||||
1 | 1.53% | 2.53% | 1.56% | 1.07% | |
2 | 1.53% | 2.48% | 1.91% | 1.07% | |
3 | 1.54% | 2.41% | 1.89% | 1.08% | |
4 | 1.55% | 2.40% | 2.54% | 1.12% | |
5 | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.42% | 1.36% | |
6 | 2.59% | 3.38% | 3.65% | 1.96% | |
7 | 3.73% | 5.04% | 4.39% | 3.02% | |
8 | 4.40% | 5.30% | 4.56% | 3.64% | |
9 | 4.45% | 5.29% | 5.67% | 3.67% | |
10 | 4.67% | 5.38% | 6.16% | 3.54% | |
11 | 5.07% | 5.61% | 5.75% | 3.79% | |
12 | 5.33% | 5.92% | 5.17% | 3.95% |
Output | PLS | LSSVM | NN | TPN |
---|---|---|---|---|
peak | 231.44 | 251.70 | 293.71 | 167.56 |
time | 2.36 | 2.47 | 2.60 | 2.48 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Feng, Y.; Xu, X.; Meng, Y. Short-Term Load Forecasting with Tensor Partial Least Squares-Neural Network. Energies 2019, 12, 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060990
Feng Y, Xu X, Meng Y. Short-Term Load Forecasting with Tensor Partial Least Squares-Neural Network. Energies. 2019; 12(6):990. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060990
Chicago/Turabian StyleFeng, Yu, Xianfeng Xu, and Yun Meng. 2019. "Short-Term Load Forecasting with Tensor Partial Least Squares-Neural Network" Energies 12, no. 6: 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060990