Next Article in Journal
Graphene Oxide: An Effective Promoter for CO2 Hydrate Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Scaling Rules at Constant Frequency for Resonant Inductive Power Transfer Systems for Electric Vehicles
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2018, 11(7), 1755; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071755

City Bus Powertrain Comparison: Driving Cycle Variation and Passenger Load Sensitivity Analysis

Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Puumiehenkuja 5, 02150 Espoo, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 June 2018 / Revised: 29 June 2018 / Accepted: 2 July 2018 / Published: 4 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [15578 KB, uploaded 4 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

Alternative powertrains are rapidly increasing in popularity in city buses. Hence, it is vitally important to understand the factors affecting the performance of the powertrains in order to operate them on appropriate routes and as efficiently as possible. To that end, this paper presents an exhaustive driving cycle and passenger load sensitivity analysis for the most common city bus powertrain topologies. Three-thousand synthetic cycles were generated for a typical suburban bus route based on measured cycles and passenger numbers from the route. The cycles were simulated with six bus models: compressed natural gas, diesel, parallel hybrid, series hybrid, hydrogen fuel cell hybrid, and battery electric bus. Twenty reference cycles featuring various types of routes were simulated for comparison. Correlations between energy consumption and the various driving cycle parameters and passenger loads were examined. Further analysis was conducted with variance decomposition. Aggressiveness and stop frequency had the highest correlation with the consumption. The diesel bus was the most sensitive to aggressiveness. The parallel hybrid had a lower statistical dispersion of consumption than the series hybrid on the suburban route. On the varied routes, the opposite was true. The performance of the parallel hybrid powertrain deteriorated significantly on cycles with high aggressiveness and stop frequency. In general, the high correlation between aggressiveness and energy consumption implies that particular attention must be paid to limiting high-speed accelerations of city buses. View Full-Text
Keywords: city bus; powertrain; driving cycle; passenger load; energy consumption city bus; powertrain; driving cycle; passenger load; energy consumption
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kivekäs, K.; Lajunen, A.; Vepsäläinen, J.; Tammi, K. City Bus Powertrain Comparison: Driving Cycle Variation and Passenger Load Sensitivity Analysis. Energies 2018, 11, 1755.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top