Next Article in Journal
Saving Energy in the Transportation Sector: An Analysis of Modified Bitumen Application Based on Marshall Test
Next Article in Special Issue
Modelling the Dynamics of Fuel and EU Allowance Prices during Phase 3 of the EU ETS
Previous Article in Journal
A Sequential Approach for Integrated Coal and Gas Mining of Closely-Spaced Outburst Coal Seams: Results from a Case Study Including Mine Safety Improvements and Greenhouse Gas Reductions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Asymmetric Impacts of Oil Price on Inflation: An Empirical Study of African OPEC Member Countries
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2018, 11(11), 3024;

Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Growth, and Energy Policy in China

School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
School of Management and Economics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 September 2018 / Revised: 22 October 2018 / Accepted: 31 October 2018 / Published: 3 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Markets and Economics)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1868 KB, uploaded 3 November 2018]   |  


China’s economy steps into the “new normal” phase, as it is growing in an innovation-driven instead of a factor-driven mode. In this paper, we constructed the corporate behavioral decision models in different scenarios of policy and analyzed the effect of energy policies on corporate behavior and societal welfare, in a duopoly market. The following conclusions were derived. (1) In a duopoly, the product pricing is irrelevant to the resource cost in their production process. (2) For the firm undertaking the social responsibility, the energy tax imposed by the government would increase either the production or the profit, but decrease the consumer surplus. In contrast, for the other firms, the energy tax rate is opposite to their profit. (3) Low-energy-consuming products will promote efficiency, which reduces either the price or the marginal cost, resulting in a more conspicuous cost advantage to the firm adopting the ecological innovation. (4) The marginal cost for a low-energy-consuming technology research and development steadily decreases, which turns their short-term financial disadvantages into the long-term competitive advantages. The marginal contribution of this paper was to build a simultaneously moving model, in duopoly market, and provide theoretical evidence to endogenize the firm strategy to undertake social responsibilities and to realize sustainable growth. View Full-Text
Keywords: strategic corporate social responsibility; environmental regulation; energy policy strategic corporate social responsibility; environmental regulation; energy policy

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, L.; Chao, A. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Growth, and Energy Policy in China. Energies 2018, 11, 3024.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top