Next Article in Journal
A Novel Thermochromic Liquid Crystal Fabric Design for the Early Detection of High-Risk Foot Complications: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Previous Article in Journal
Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Tarsal Navicular: Case Report and Review of a Rare Injury
 
 
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association is published by MDPI from Volume 116 Issue 1 (2026). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with American Podiatric Medical Association.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking

by
Kristína Tománková
1,2,*,
Miroslava PřIdalová
1,
Zdenek Svoboda
1 and
Roman Cuberek
3
1
Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, tř. Míru 117, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Anthropology and Health Education, Faculty of Education, Palacký University, Olomouc, Žižkovo náměstí 5, 771 40 Olomouc, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Active Lifestyle, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2017, 107(3), 208-214; https://doi.org/10.7547/15-143
Published: 1 May 2017

Abstract

Background: Excessive body weight seems to be a risk factor for foot loading. We sought to investigate the effect of different body mass index (BMI) levels on plantar pressure distribution during walking. Methods: In total, 163 women aged 45 to 65 years (mean ± SD: age, 57.4 ± 5.3 years; BMI, 27.0 ± 5.3) participated in the study. The women were divided, on the basis of BMI, into a normal-weight, overweight, or obese group. The study used the four following plantar pressure parameters (PPPs): contact percentage, absolute pressure impulse, relative pressure impulse, and absolute peak pressure, which were recorded in ten foot regions using a pressure measurement system. Results: The normal-weight group, compared with the overweight and obese groups, had significantly lower absolute PPP values. In the hallux, second through fifth metatarsals, midfoot, and heel regions, we observed significant between-group differences in the two absolute PPPs (peak pressure and pressure impulse) (P < .001). Between-group differences in the relative PPPs were found in the fourth metatarsal, midfoot, and medial heel (relative impulse) and in the second metatarsal (contact percentage) (P < .001). Conclusions: Higher BMI values correspond to a higher load on the foot during walking in women. The relative foot load in obese women is characterized by a pressure increase in the lateral forefoot and midfoot and by a pressure decrease in the medial heel. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 107(3): 208-214, 2017)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tománková, K.; PřIdalová, M.; Svoboda, Z.; Cuberek, R. Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2017, 107, 208-214. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-143

AMA Style

Tománková K, PřIdalová M, Svoboda Z, Cuberek R. Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2017; 107(3):208-214. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tománková, Kristína, Miroslava PřIdalová, Zdenek Svoboda, and Roman Cuberek. 2017. "Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking" Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 107, no. 3: 208-214. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-143

APA Style

Tománková, K., PřIdalová, M., Svoboda, Z., & Cuberek, R. (2017). Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 107(3), 208-214. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-143

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop