Next Article in Journal
The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Audit Quality: An Analysis from the Perspectives of External Auditors in the UAE
Previous Article in Journal
A Generalized Entropy Approach to Portfolio Selection under a Hidden Markov Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Assessment of the Association between Political Orientation and Financial Risk Tolerance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pandemic-Era Uncertainty

1
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Research Department, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA
2
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México Business School, Mexico City 01080, Mexico
3
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
4
Hoover Institution, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
5
Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15(8), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080338
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Uncertainty Vis a Vis Risk in Investment Decisions)

Abstract

We examine several measures of uncertainty to make five points. First, equity market traders and executives at nonfinancial firms have shared similar assessments about one-year-ahead uncertainty since the pandemic struck. Both the one-year VIX and our survey-based measure of firm-level uncertainty at a one-year forecast horizon doubled at the onset of the pandemic and then fell about half-way back to pre-pandemic levels by mid-2021. Second, and in contrast, the 1-month VIX, a Twitter-based Economic Uncertainty Index, and macro forecaster disagreement all rose sharply in reaction to the pandemic but retrenched almost completely by mid-2021. Third, Categorical Policy Uncertainty Indexes highlight the changing sources of uncertainty—from healthcare and fiscal policy uncertainty in spring 2020 to elevated uncertainty around monetary policy and national security as of May 2022. Fourth, firm-level risk perceptions skewed heavily to the downside in spring 2020 but shifted rapidly to the upside from fall 2020 onwards. Perceived upside uncertainty remains highly elevated as of early 2022. Fifth, our survey evidence suggests that elevated uncertainty is exerting only mild restraint on capital investment plans for 2022 and 2023, perhaps because perceived risks are so skewed to the upside.
Keywords: business expectations; uncertainty; subjective forecast distributions; capital investments business expectations; uncertainty; subjective forecast distributions; capital investments

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer, B.; Mihaylov, E.; Barrero, J.M.; Davis, S.J.; Altig, D.; Bloom, N. Pandemic-Era Uncertainty. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080338

AMA Style

Meyer B, Mihaylov E, Barrero JM, Davis SJ, Altig D, Bloom N. Pandemic-Era Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022; 15(8):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meyer, Brent, Emil Mihaylov, Jose Maria Barrero, Steven J. Davis, David Altig, and Nicholas Bloom. 2022. "Pandemic-Era Uncertainty" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no. 8: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080338

APA Style

Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Barrero, J. M., Davis, S. J., Altig, D., & Bloom, N. (2022). Pandemic-Era Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080338

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop