Next Article in Journal
Clinical Potential of Himalayan Herb Bergenia ligulata: An Evidence-Based Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Interplay between Nanoparticles and Phosphorus Dendrimers, and Their Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an HPV Genotype Detection Platform Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission (AIE) and Flow-Through Hybridization Technologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
MoS2 and MoS2 Nanocomposites for Adsorption and Photodegradation of Water Pollutants: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 20
10.3390/molecules27207037
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formation Optimization, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Auricularia auricula-judae Polysaccharide Nanoparticles Obtained via Antisolvent Precipitation

by
Yemei Dai
†,
Yuan Ma
*,†,
Xiaocui Liu
,
Ruyun Gao
,
Hongmei Min
,
Siyu Zhang
and
Siyu Hu
Sichuan Key Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, School of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
Molecules 2022, 27(20), 7037; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207037
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 14 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Auricularia auricula-judae polysaccharide (AAP)-based nanoparticles (NPs) prepared via an anti-solvent precipitation approach were studied. Response surface methodology (RSM) design was carried out on the basis of single factor experiments, using average size and polydispersity index (PDI) as indicators. The optimal preparation conditions were determined to include an AAP concentration of 1 mg/mL, a pH of 8, and an anti-solvent/solvent volume ratio of 6. The average particle sizes of the AAP-NPs, PDI and electrical characteristic (ζ-potential) were found to be 150.27 ± 3.21 nm, 0.135 ± 0.012 and −31.10 ± 0.52 mV, respectively. Furthermore, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to determine the chemical structure of the AAP-NPs. It was observed that the intensity of AAP-NPs in the wide spectral band of 3000–3750 cm−1 was significantly stronger than that of the AAP, as was the characteristic peak of carboxyl anion, and the characteristic band moved to shorter wavelengths. Subsequent thermogravimetric analysis showed that the antisolvent precipitation method improved the thermal stability of the AAP, while scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the morphology of AAP-NPs was uniform and well-distributed, and that their single crystal structures had remained unaffected during the process. Moreover, the DPPH and ABTS scavenging activities of AAP-NPs were increased, and the IC50 values were 0.544 ± 0.241 mg/mL and 0.755 ± 0.226 mg/mL, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Auricularia auricula-judae (A. auricula), of the genus Auricularia, family Auriculariaceae, order Auriculariales, class Agaricomycetes, and phylum Basidiomycota [1], is a common edible fungus with rich nutritional value found mainly in the Northern Hemisphere. Modern medical research [2,3,4,5] has shown that A. auricula can also provide extensive medicinal benefits. Its main active component, A. auricula polysaccharide (AAP), has been found to exhibit numerous physiological functions, including antioxidation [6,7], and antibacterial [8], hypoglycemic [9] and anti-cardiovascular activities [10]. AAP shows little toxicity or side effects in vivo, indicating that it has application value in the development of food and health products [11]. However, as a long-chain carbohydrate formed by the complex polymerization of various neutral sugars or ursolic acids through glycosidic bonds [12], polysaccharides exhibit poor pharmacokinetic behavior, resulting in low drug delivery and bioavailability in vivo [13].
The conversion of bioactive polysaccharides into nanoparticles (NPs) is an effective way to improve their comprehensive utilization. NPs exhibit promising advantages such as good cell penetration, targeting ability and biocompatibility and, consequently, are increasingly the subject of scientific investigation [14]. Due to their small particle size, large specific surface area and good biocompatibility, nanoparticles have been widely used in biomedical food industries, in applications such as nanocarriers and edible coatings. Generally speaking, the main methods used in the preparation of NPs include ion cross-linking [15,16], anti-solvent precipitation [17], emulsion cross-linking [18,19], chemical cross-linking [20,21], condensation, and spray drying [22]. Anti-solvent precipitation involves the addition of a solution of a drug or polymer (usually in a non-volatile solvent) to its antisolvent which leads to the precipitation of amorphous solid dispersions, provided the drug or polymer is insoluble in the antisolvent [23]. While there have been reports on the preparation of AAP-NPs using the ion cross-linking method, such as the studies by Xiong et al. [24,25] in which a new type of polyelectrolyte complex NPs were prepared using negatively charged A. auricula polysaccharides and positively charged chitosan as materials, to the best of our knowledge little information has thus far been made available on the preparation and biological activities of A. auricula polysaccharides nanoparticles (AAP-NPs). Compared with other methods in the preparation process, including the ion cross-linking method, the antisolvent precipitation method requires no special equipment, is low in cost, requires fewer types of reagents, and does not easily pollute samples, which is why it has recently attracted widespread attention [26]. Kakran et al. [27] prepared quercetin nanoparticles via injection using the anti-solvent precipitation method, and results showed that the dissolution rate and solubility of quercetin obtained using this method were improved in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF, pH 6.8) compared with the pure drugs. Chen et al. [28] developed oxidized lotus root starch (OLRS) nanoparticles in the hope of improving the stability and antioxidant activity of luteolin through this method. The results showed that OLRS NPs stabilized luteolin in simulated gastric juice and continuously released luteolin in simulated intestinal juice, and the antioxidant capacity was improved. Charoenchaitrakool et al. [29] used acetone as an organic solvent to dissolve the copolymers of mefenamic acid (MEF), paracetamol (PAR) and nicotinamide (NIC), with carbon dioxide as an anti-solvent. The new eutectic of MEF-PAR-NIC was successfully prepared and, in comparison with unprocessed MEF, the dissolution rate of MEF was increased 23.9 times and 20.8 times, respectively, under two different experimental conditions. The results of these studies suggest that the preparation of nanoparticles via the antisolvent precipitation method could result in different characteristics from the corresponding bulk materials while increasing the specific surface area of the material. However, this approach has not yet been applied to fungal polysaccharides.
Due to its simple operation and low cost, anti-solvent precipitation has more industrial application value compared with other nanoparticle preparation methods. Since this method had not hitherto been applied to mushroom polysaccharides, response surface methodology was used to optimize the preparation conditions of AAP-NPs, whereafter the particle size, PDI and ζ-potential of the prepared AAP-NPs were determined and the optimal preparation process of AAP-NPs via anti-solvent precipitation was obtained. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis and in vitro antioxidant activity analysis were performed for comparative analyses with the original AAP. This study enriches the existing preparation methods of mushroom nanoparticles and has reference significance for the industrial preparation of mushroom nanoparticles.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Selection of Factors and Their Levels via Single Factor Analysis

Prior to the optimization of the preparation parameters, the single factor effects of AAP-NPs average particle size as well as the PDI between AAP concentration, pH value and (v/v) were studied.
As shown in Figure 1a, within the AAP concentration range of 0.5~2.5%, the average particle size and PDI value of the AAP-NPs decreased initially and then increased. The antisolvent precipitation method produces nanoparticles in a ‘bottom-up’ self-assembly process. The precipitation process includes (i) supersaturation generation, (ii) nucleation and (iii) subsequent nuclei growth [30,31]. Higher drug concentrations can lead to higher supersaturation, resulting in faster nucleation rates [32]. In this study, when the AAP concentration was 1%, the average particle size of the AAP-NPs reached a minimum of 161.102 ± 4.932 nm, the molecular weight distribution of the AAP-NPs was the most uniform, and the PDI was also lowest at 0.212 ± 0.013. However, high supersaturation can also accelerate particle collisions, producing particles with a larger diameter. At higher drug concentrations, a large number of nuclei are formed at the interface of the two phases, and particle agglomeration is better than nucleation since it results in a wider molecular weight distribution of particles [33]. Thus, 1% was found to be the optimal concentration of the AAP-NPs prepared via the antisolvent precipitation approach selected by single factor experiment.
The average particle size and PDI of AAP-NPs in the range of pH = 5.0~9.0 are shown in Figure 1b. The size of AAP-NPs was found to be stable at 150~200 nm under alkaline and neutral conditions. When the pH reached 7, the particle size and PDI of the AAP-NPs reached their minimum values, at 165.391 ± 5.519 nm and 0.221 ± 0.009, respectively. However, particle size increased significantly under acidic conditions. These experimental results are consistent with those reported by Qin et al. [34], and indicate that the stability of AAP-NPs under neutral and alkaline conditions was better than that under acidic conditions. The reason for this phenomenon may be that the glycosidic bonds in the polysaccharides only ensured their stability in alkaline and neutral environments. However, the increase of the concentration of hydronium ion in an acidic medium has been shown to accelerate the hydrolysis and degradation process of glycosidic bonds, subsequently leading to the shortening of the cellulose chain of A. auricula polysaccharides, manifested as the decrease in the degree of AAP-NP polymerization [35].
The antisolvent: solvent volume ratio is a key index in the preparation of nanoparticles via antisolvent precipitation [36]. As shown in Figure 1c, with the increase in the antisolvent: solvent ratio (v/v), the AAP-NPs first decreased slowly and then increased sharply. When the antisolvent: solvent ratio (v/v) was 6:1, the mean particle size and PDI of AAP-NPs reached their minimum values or 180.591 ± 1.173 nm and 0.195 ± 0.015, respectively. Previous studies have shown that the solubility of polysaccharides in ethanol gradually decreases as the degree of polymerization increases [37]. Combined with the principle of preparing AAP-NPs via antisolvent precipitation, under the condition of various antisolvent: solvent volume ratios, the components of the AAP precipitated by local saturation may differ. At a lower antisolvent: solvent volume ratio, for example, an AAP with a low degree of polymerization is precipitated and so the particle diameter is smaller, whereas under the condition of a higher volume ratio, an AAP with a high degree of polymerization is mainly precipitated.
Through the single factor experimental design herein, the concentration of 1% AAP, pH of 7 and antisolvent: solvent ratio (v/v) of 6:1 were ultimately selected as the central parameters for the BBD, and the average particle size and PDI were taken as the response values to further optimize the preparation of AAP-NPs.

2.2. RSM Optimization of Operating Parameters

2.2.1. Model Building and ANOVA

Compared with the classical central composite design (CCD), BBD requires less experimental data in the case of three factors [38] and, consequently, was selected for application in this study. A three-factor and three-level Box-Behnken response surface test was designed using Design-Expert V. 8.1.5 (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA), and the (A) AAP concentration, (B) pH and (C) antisolvent: solvent volume ratio were optimized. The experimental parameters, average size and PDI of the AAP-NPs are shown in Table 1, with the ANOVA results presented in Table 2.
Based on the results of the multiple regression analysis, the quadratic regression equation of the AAP-NPs’ (Y1) average size and (Y2) PDI with (A) AAP concentration, (B) pH and (C) antisolvent: solvent volume ratio were obtained as follows:
Y1 = 153.07 − 2.51A − 2.03B − 1.25C − 3.32AB + 1.52AC + 4.44BC + 15.75A2 + 8.27B2 + 10.24C2
Y2 = 0.14 − 0.023A − 0.034B − 2.273E − 0.003C − 0.018AB − 0.022AC + 0.016BC + 0.11A2 − 0.069B2−0.049C2
As shown in Table 2, the Model F-values of (Y1) average size and (Y2) PDI were 99.86 and 58.63, respectively, and both had p-values < 0.0001, indicating that both of the two models had reached the highly significant level and had statistical significance. In addition, the ‘lack of fit’ of both Model 1 and Model 2 had p-values > 0.05, with no significant influence, demonstrating that there were no misfitting factors and that the test sites could be described by the model. Furthermore, the regression equation could well explain the results and predict the best preparation conditions. The correction coefficients (R2) were, successively, 0.9923 and 0.9869, both of which results were above 95%. Thus, the dependent variable was shown to have a significant impact on the independent variables (p < 0.01). The adjusted determination coefficient (Radj2) of Model 1 was 0.9823, and the coefficient of variation (C.V.%) was 0.87, indicating that only 0.87% of the total variation could not be explained by the model and that it, thus, had achieved a high degree of fit. Moreover, the ratio of adeq. precision of Model 1 was 27.915 more than 4, demonstrating that this Mode l could be used to navigate the design space. The same results and conclusion were obtained with Model 2.
The significance of each factor (A-AAP concentration, B-pH and C-antisolvent: solvent volume ratio) was subsequently tested. In Model 1, the one degree terms A and B were found to have significant effects on the average size (Y1) of the AAP-NPs (p < 0.01), the interaction terms AB and BC also had significant effects on Y1 (p < 0.01), while the second-order terms A2, B2 and C2 had significant effects on the average size (p < 0.01). In Model 2, the one degree terms A, B and C had extremely significant effects on the PDI (Y2) of the AAP-NPs (p < 0.01), and the F-values revealed that the contributions of the factors in this experiment were A > B > C. The interaction terms AB and AC had significant effects on PDI (p < 0.05), and the second-order terms were extremely significant (p < 0.01).

2.2.2. Three-Dimensional (3D) Response Surface Diagram Analysis

The 3D response surface plot provides an intuitive interpretation of the interaction between two independent variables. The degree of influence of the two variables on the response value was determined by observing the inclination degree of the surface. The higher the inclination degree of the 3D response surface graph, the steeper the slope and the more significant the interaction [39,40].
As can be seen in the 3D response surface diagram of the models (Figure 2), when the values of the three factors, (A) AAP concentration, (B) pH and (C) antisolvent: solvent volume ratio, were small, the response surface was steep, indicating that the influence of each factor on the (Y1) average size and (Y2) PDI of the AAP-NPs was obvious. However, when the value was large, the opposite occurred. Moreover, intense interactions between factors A and B, and B and C of Model 1 (Figure 2a,c), as well as between A and B, and A and C of Model 2 (Figure 2d,e) were observed visually, all of which were consistent with the results of the ANOVA.

2.2.3. Prediction of Optimal Response Surface

The minimum values of average size and PDI were applied to solve the regression equation using Design-Expert V. 8.0.6, thereby obtaining the optimal preparation conditions based on the antisolvent precipitation approach for AAP-NPs. The optimal combination of factors predicted by the software were an AAP concentration of 1.05 mg/mL, a pH of 8.01, and an antisolvent: solvent volume ratio of 6.01:1. The predicted average size and PDI were 152.95 nm and 0.141, respectively. The optimized experimental conditions were refined for real application as follows: an AAP concentration of 1 mg/mL, pH of 8, and antisolvent: solvent volume ratio of 6:1.

2.3. Morphology and Size Analysis

Particle size and dispersion are two key factors affecting the therapeutic potential of nanocarriers [41]. The best applicable range of PDI for the algorithm was found to be between 0.08 and 0.7, indicating that the sample to be tested was a moderately dispersed system. The larger the absolute value of ξ-potential, the stronger the repulsive force between particles and, consequently, the more stable the dispersion of particles in the system [42]. It is generally believed that polysaccharide solutions are relatively stable when the absolute value of ξ-potential is approximately 30 mV. The particle size distributions of AAP-NPs in triplicate experiments are shown in Figure 3. In this study, the average size of AAP-NPs was 150.27 ± 3.21 nm, and the PDI was 0.135 ± 0.012, which were in good agreement with the response surface prediction results. In addition, the ζ-potential of the AAP-NPs was −31.10 ± 0.52 mV. Zhang et al. [43] used the same method to prepare Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticles and obtained an average particle size, PDI and ξ-potential of 229.63 nm, 0.407 and −28.43 mV, respectively. The experimental results showed that the AAP-NPs prepared herein via response surface had a small particle size and good dispersion stability, indicating that the response surface had played an effective role in optimizing their preparation conditions.
In addition, the apparent morphologies of the AAP-NPs and AAP as observed via SEM is shown in Figure 4, in which it can be seen that the AAP without antisolvent precipitation was irregular sheet or rod shaped, with a large overall volume, while the rod-like AAP-NPs with uniform morphology and good distribution had been successfully synthesized. In conclusion, antisolvent precipitation effectively reduced the volume and increased the specific surface area of the AAP. Combined with the preparation process and SEM image analysis, the formation process of AAP-NPs can be described as follows: First, the AAP solution was diluted in a volume of absolute ethanol in which, due to supersaturation, it precipitates into a flocculent shape; subsequently, under the action of constant speed magnetic stirring, the flocculating polysaccharide is constantly wound and contracted, forming tiny nanoparticles.

2.4. FTIR Spectra Analysis

The effect of the antisolvent precipitation on the structure of AAP, as measured via FTIR, is shown in Figure 5. In general, the spectral features of the AAP-NPs and AAP were found to be similar, with the exception of some characteristic bands that showed changes in absorbance and wave number. The AAP-NPs and AAP shared a broad band in the 3000–3750 cm−1 region, and both had a strong characteristic absorption peak at 3397 cm−1, which was caused by the O-H stretching vibration of the polysaccharide hydroxyl group. In addition, a weak absorption peak at 2925 cm−1 was caused by the C-H stretching vibration of the polysaccharide alkyl group. The typical groups of polysaccharides are hydroxyl and alkyl [44,45]. The above results indicated the consistency of the AAP and AAP-NPs in the characteristic functional groups. Both the asymmetric (1700~1600 cm−1) and symmetric (1400~1300 cm−1) stretching of carboxyl anions exhibited characteristic peaks, indicating the presence of carboxyl groups and uronic acids in the samples, which were also responsible for the antioxidant properties of the AAP and AAP-NPs [46]. Intuitively, it was evident that the strength of AAP-NPs in the broad spectral band of 3000~3750 cm−1 was significantly greater than that of the AAP. Zhang et al. [47] speculated that the hydrogen bonds between polysaccharide molecular chains become stronger during nanotization. Interestingly, the intensity of the characteristic peak of the carboxyl anion of AAP-NPs in this study was significantly stronger than that of the AAP, and the characteristic band shifted to shorter wavelengths, indicating that the carboxyl anion in the polysaccharide molecular chain had been strengthened in the process of glycogenation. Therefore, it was speculated that AAP-NPs could have higher antioxidant activity than AAP, which was subsequently verified in the in vitro free radical scavenging activity experiment.

2.5. XRD Analysis

XRD phase analysis is a technique that uses the diffraction effect of X-ray in crystalline materials to analyze the structure of materials as either crystal or amorphous [48]. As shown in Figure 6, the multiple independent diffraction patterns of AAP-NPs and AAP showed no distinct differences, indicating that their crystal structures were the same and that the crystal structure of the AAP-NPs was not influenced by the antisolvent precipitation nanotization. Zhang et al. [43] used absolute ethanol as the antisolvent to prepare Sargasso pallidum polysaccharide NPs, while Park et al. [49] used distilled water as the antisolvent to prepare carbamazepine NPs, and the crystallinity of neither of these NPs was found to be affected by the process. In addition, in this study, the XRD pattern of both the AAP-NPs and AAP exhibited a sharp and narrow peak (2θ = 28.67°), which indicated that both had stable crystal structures. This result is consistent with that reported by Ren et al. [50], in which the XRD of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) polysaccharide QPI-Ⅰ had an obvious diffraction peak at 28.40°, which inferred that the QPI-Ⅰ had a stable single crystal structure.

2.6. Thermostability Analysis

Figure 7a shows that the thermogravimetric (TG) curves of the AAP-NPs and AAP within the experimental temperature range were similar, and could be summarized into three approximate stages. During the first stage, the mass losses of the AAP-NPs and AAP were approximately 9.47% and 10.24%, respectively, when the temperatures of the samples rose from 25 °C to 150 °C as a result of the evaporation of free and bound water in the polysaccharides [51]. In the second stage, the AAP-NPs and AAP exhibited obvious mass losses, mainly in the temperature range of 200 °C to 400 °C. The mass loss rates of the AAP-NPs and AAP were approximately 53.43% and 66.02%, respectively, and may have been caused by the glycan degradation of polysaccharides in this stage [52,53]. The third stage of thermal degradation was from 450 °C to 550 °C, during which both the AAP-NPs and AAP were calcined into ash. The final residual amounts at 600 °C were 10.5% and 5.63%, respectively. Corresponding to the TG curve, a DTG curve reflects the variation in the sample mass loss rate with temperature, and the peak value represents the temperature at which a sample reaches its maximum mass loss rate. In the DTG curves herein (Figure 7b), a peak in the AAP curve was evident at 480.01 °C, however, the peak shifted to 485.7 °C corresponding to the AAP-NPs curve, indicating that the antisolvent precipitation method had improved the thermal stability of the AAP. This may have been due to the strong electrostatic interaction between the hydrogen bonds in the AAP-NPs particles. Thermostability analysis laid a foundation for the application of AAP-NPs in thermal processing such as sterilization and baking [52].

2.7. Free Radical Scavenging Activity Assays

Polysaccharides isolated from natural sources have been shown to have potent antioxidant capabilities in vitro [54]. DPPH is a relatively stable free radical, and exogenous antioxidants can pair with free electrons to form stable presence groups, thereby weakening absorption. Antioxidant activity is evaluated indirectly by measuring the degree of absorption reduction. Due to its high stability, experimental feasibility and low cost, the DPPH method is often used in experiments to evaluate the antioxidant activity of chemical substances [55]. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the AAP-NPs in this study compared with that of the VC is shown in Figure 8a. The AAP-NPs, AAP and VC all showed good linear dose-response relationships within the experimental concentration range. At each concentration point, the AAP-NPs showed higher DPPH free radical scavenging rates than those of the AAP, but both were consistently lower than those of the positive control VC. Under the conditions of low concentration (0.1 mg/mL) and high concentration (2 mg/mL), the DPPH free radical scavenging rate of the AAP-NPs was higher than that of the AAP (33.333 ± 3.162%) and (24.860 ± 2.051%), respectively. The half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the AAP-NPs, AAP and VC were 0.544 ± 0.241 mg/mL, 1.004 ± 0.236 mg/mL and 0.060 ± 0.207 mg/mL, respectively. These results showed that the DPPH scavenging activity of A. auricula polysaccharides could be improved by antisolvent precipitation. Chen et al. [56] reported a similar effect when they prepared Mori Fructus nanoparticles using the same method, with their results indicating a significant improvement in the antioxidant activities of the nanoparticles.
The in vitro antioxidant activities of the AAP-NPs were subsequently further determined via the measurement of ABTS+ radical scavenging activity. Mixed with ABTS+ radicals, samples with antioxidant properties will generate colored substances with free radicals, which subsequently fade the total system and reduce its light absorption value, thereby reflecting the strength of the antioxidant ability [57]. As shown in Figure 8b, the AAP-NPs, AAP and VC in this study all exhibited dose-dependent quenching of ABTS+ radicals in the experimental concentration range. Based on IC50, the rank order of ABTS+ radical scavenging rates were as follows: AAP (IC50 mg/mL = 1.059 ± 0.226) > AAP-NPs (IC50 mg/mL = 0.755 ± 0.226) > VC (IC50 mg/mL = 0.063 ± 0.327). These experimental results, therefore, prove that the antisolvent precipitation treatment similarly increased the ABTS+ radical scavenging rate of the agaric polysaccharides.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

A. auricula polysaccharides were purchased from Shanxi Ciyuan Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shaanxi, China). Potassium bromide (SP, 99%), DPPH (SP, 98%), ABTS diammonium salt (SP, 98%), oxalic acid (98%), sodium hydroxide, ascorbic acid (VC) (analytical standard product, HPLC ≥ 99%) were purchased from Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). N-butanol, ethyl alcohol, potassium persulfate and other analytic-grade reagents were obtained from the Kelong Chemical Reagent Factory (Chengdu, China).

3.2. Formation of AAP-NPs

The A. auricula AAP-NPs were prepared via antisolvent precipitation, according to the experimental methods reported by Qin et al. [34] and Machmudah et al. [58], with slight modifications. Based on the differences in solubility between polysaccharides in deionized water and those in absolute ethanol, deionized water was used as the solvent while absolute ethanol was used as the antisolvent. Briefly, the A. auricula polysaccharides were mixed with deionized water and the solution was fully dissolved by magnetic stirring at room temperature (25 °C) for 1 h. The solution was then filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous filter membrane, and the pH value of polysaccharide solution was subsequently adjusted using sodium hydroxide or oxalic acid. Under constant speed mechanical stirring for 2 h with a magnetic stirrer, 2 mL polysaccharide solution was added to a certain volume of absolute ethanol. In this process, AAP was constantly supersaturated and precipitated into filaments, and then wound and contracted under the action of magnetic stirring at a constant speed until, finally, AAP-NPs were formed and distributed uniformly in the solution. The suspension was then centrifuged, the precipitate was rinsed with absolute ethanol to remove excess water, and the AAP-NPs were obtained via lyophilization. The formation process of AAP-NPs is shown in Figure 9.

3.3. Determination of Average Particle Size, Polydispersity Index and Electrical Characteristics of AAP-NPs

The average particle size, PDI and ζ-potential of the AAP-NPs were determined via the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique using a zetasizer (Nano ZEN3600, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Prior to measurement, to avoid multiple scattering effects, the nanoparticle dispersion was diluted with ultra-pure water (0.1~0.5%) and equilibrated in a measuring chamber at 25 ± 1 °C. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

3.4. Optimization of AAP-NPs Formation

3.4.1. Single Factor Designs

The general preparation of AAP-NPs via the antisolvent precipitation approach was performed as described above. The concentration and pH of the polysaccharide solution, along with the solvent: antisolvent ratio, were the three main factors affecting the formation of the nanoparticles [59]. The average particle size and PDI of the AAP-NPs measured via the zetasizer were used as evaluation indexes to investigate the effects of the A. auricula polysaccharide solution concentration, pH value and antisolvent: solvent ratio on the average particle size formation and dispersion of the AAP-NPs. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
When investigating the impact of the AAP solution concentration in a range of 0.5~3%, the pH value of the AAP solution and antisolvent: solvent ratio were set to 7 and 6:1, respectively.
When investigating the impact of pH value of the AAP solution in a range of 5~9, the concentration of the AAP solution was set to 2%, and the antisolvent: solvent ratio was kept at 6:1.
When investigating the impact of the antisolvent: solvent volume ratio in a range of 4:1~8:1, the concentration and pH value of AAP solution were set to 2% and 7.4, respectively.

3.4.2. Box–Behnken Design (BBD)

The relevant factors affecting the formation of AAP-NPs were preliminarily determined on the basis of the single factor experimental results. RSM was subsequently applied to optimize the formation process using Design-Expert.V8.0.6.1 (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). According to the Box-Behnken central combination design principle, a three-level-three-factor BBD was employed to evaluate the combined effect of the three independent variables affecting the average particle size and PDI of AAP-NPs, namely (A) the AAP concentration, (B) pH value and (C) antisolvent: solvent ratio. The test factors and levels are presented in Table 3.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The morphology of the AAP-NPs was analyzed using a Hitachi 7700 SEM (Tokyo, Japan), with AAP as the control. The samples were fixed on copper plates and sprayed with gold. The microscopic morphology of the samples was observed and recorded using scanning electron microscopy under high vacuum conditions with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and image magnification of 2000 to 50,000.

3.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

The chemical structures of the AAP-NPs and the AAP were measured via FTIR (Tensor 27, Jasco Inc., Easton, MD, USA). First, the AAP-NPs and AAP were ground with agate mortar, to which dried chromatography-pure KBr powder was added. The mixture was then placed evenly into the mold and pressed into pieces on the tablet press, after which infrared spectrum analysis was carried out with FTIR. The KBr powder was used as the background, and the spectral domain was set to be between 4000 and 500 cm−1.

3.7. X-ray Diffraction

The crystal morphologies of the AAP and AAP-NPs were determined using an XRD analyzer (Empyrean, Malvern Panalytical, Shanghai, China). Voltage and current of the copper target were set as 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. Diffraction temperature was kept at 25 °C and the samples were collected in the 2θ range from 5–40°.

3.8. Thermostability

Thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA-50, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to study the thermodynamic properties of the AAP-NPs, with AAP as the control. Using accurately weighed 3~5 mg samples. The experimental temperature range was 25~550 °C, the heating rate was 10 °C/min, and the nitrogen flow rate was 50 mL/min.

3.9. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH activity was measured according to a previously reported method, with some modifications [60]. Initially, a series of concentration gradient test sample solutions (1.0 mL, 0.1~2.0 mg/mL) were mixed with 300 μL DPPH solution (0.4 mmol/L in EtOH) and 2.0 mL distilled water. The reaction mixture was shaken well and then left in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The resulting solution was measured at 517 nm, and AAP and VC (0.05~0.30 mg/mL) were used as controls. The DPPH radical scavenging rate was calculated using Equation (3):
DPPH scavenging rate (%) = [A2 − (A1 − A3)]/A2 × 100%
where A1 is the absorbance of the sample (DPPH solution with sample or controls), A2 is the absorbance of the control (DPPH solution with deionized water), and A3 is the absorbance of the blank (deionized water with sample or controls).

3.10. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

The ABTS radical scavenging rate was determined using a previously described method, with minor modifications [61]. In brief, 20 mL ABTS (7 mmol/L) solution and 352 μL (140 mmol/L) potassium persulfate solution were mixed by vortex and then left to stand in the dark for 16 h at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Subsequently, 4 mL ABTS stock solution was drawn and the absorbance at 734 nm was adjusted to 0.700 ± 0.02 with distilled water. Thereafter, various concentrations (200 μL, 0.1~2.0 mg/mL) of AAP-NPs solutions were mixed with 3 mL of a diluted ABTS solution in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 734 nm, as were the controls. The ABTS radical scavenging rate was calculated using Equation (4):
ABTS scavenging rate (%) = [A2 − (A1 − A3)]/A2 × 100%
where A1 represents the absorbance of the sample (diluted ABTS solution with sample or controls), A2 is the absorbance of the control (diluted ABTS solution with deionized water), and A3 is the absorbance of the blank (deionized water with sample or controls).

3.11. Statistical Analysis

In addition to the RSM, all statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (IBM SPSS 24, SPSS Inc., NY, USA). Data were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test and least-significant difference (LSD) to determine significant differences among the means at an α = 0.05 level. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The graphics were created using Origin Pro software (93E version, OriginLab Corporation, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

In this study, A. auricula polysaccharide nanoparticles were successfully prepared via the anti-solvent precipitation method, and the preparation conditions were optimized. The structure of the AAP-NPs prepared in this paper was that of a single crystal, which was not affected by the process of anti-solvent precipitation. Furthermore, the speculation that the process of antisolvent precipitation would enhance the hydrogen bonds between the molecular chains of AAP and strengthen the carboxyl anions was verified via subsequent thermogravimetric analysis and in vitro antioxidant tests. These results, thus, prove the suitability of AAP-NPs for application as antioxidants in the food- and health-related industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D.; Writing—original draft, Y.D., X.L., H.M., S.Z. and S.H.; Writing—review & editing, Y.M. and Y.D.; Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by Science and technology support program of Sichuan province [grant number 2021YFQ0071], Science and technology planning program of Sichuan province [grant number 2020YFN0121] and College students innovation and entrepreneurship training program of Xihua university [grant number S202010650104].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Wu, F.; Dai, Y.C. Notes on the nomenclature of the Auricularia auricula-judae complex. Mycosystema 2015, 34, 604–611. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhou, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, K.; Wang, Q.; Bao, H. Effects of Auricularia auricula-judae polysaccharide on pasting, gelatinization, rheology, structural properties and in vitro digestibility of kidney bean starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ma, J.; Qiao, Z.; Xia, X. Optimisation of extraction procedure for black fungus polysaccharides and effect of the polysaccharides on blood lipid and myocardium antioxidant enzymes activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peng, X.B.; Qian, L.; Ou, L.N.; Jiang, L.F.; Zeng, K. GC-MS, FT-IR analysis of black fungus polysaccharides and its inhibition against skin aging in mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 304–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pak, S.J.; Chen, F.; Ma, L.; Hu, X.; Ji, J. Functional perspective of black fungi (Auricularia auricula): Major bioactive components, health benefits and potential mechanisms. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lei, Q.A.; Han, L.B.; Tao, L.C.; Yl, D.; Zz, A.; Yz, B. Purification, characterization and in vitro antioxidant activity of a polysaccharide AAP–3–1 from Auricularia auricula. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar]
  7. Islam, T.; Yao, F.; Kang, W.; Lu, L.; Xu, B. A systematic study on mycochemical profiles, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities of 30 varieties of jew’s ear (Auricularia auricula-judae). Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2022, 11, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H.; Yang, Y.; Jian, X.; Wei, J.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, H. Comparison of compositions and antimicrobial activities of essential oils from chemically stimulated agarwood, wild agarwood and healthy Aquilaria sinensis (lour.) gilg trees. Molecules 2011, 16, 4884–4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Xiang, H.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Cui, C. Hypoglycemic polysaccharides from Auricularia auricula and Auricularia polytricha inhibit oxidative stress, NF-κb signaling and proinflammatory cytokine production in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2021, 10, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Y.; Shen, M.; Chen, Y.; Lou, Y.; Luo, R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, W. Optimization of the polysaccharide hydrolysate from Auricularia auricula with antioxidant activity by response surface methodology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bao, H.; You, S.; Cao, L.; Zhou, R.; Wang, Q.; Cui, S.W. Chemical and rheological properties of polysaccharides from fruit body of Auricularia auricular-judae. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 57, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Ren, Y.; Gao, Z. Edible fungal polysaccharides, the gut microbiota, and host health. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhe, L.; Wang, L.N.; Lin, X.; Lan, S.; Yi, F. Drug delivery for bioactive polysaccharides to improve their drug-like properties and curative efficacy. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zeb, A.; Rana, I.; Choi, H.I.; Lee, C.H.; Baek, S.W.; Lim, C.W. Potential and applications of nanocarriers for efficient delivery of biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, P.; She, F.; Kong, L. Development of chitosan nanoparticles as drug delivery systems for 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin blends. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 85, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meng, J.; Sturgis, T.F.; Youan, B. Engineering tenofovir loaded chitosan nanoparticles to maximize microbicide mucoadhesion. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 44, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gu, X.; Zhang, W.L.; Liu, J.P.; Shaw, J.P.; Xu, Y.M.; Lu, H.; Wu, Z.M. Preparation and characterization of a lovastatin-loaded protein-free nanostructured lipid carrier resembling high-density lipoprotein and evaluation of its targeting to foam cells. AAPS PharmSciTech 2011, 12, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Karnchanajindanun, J.; Srisa-Ard, M.; Baimark, Y. Genipin-cross-linked chitosan microspheres prepared by a water-in-oil emulsion solvent diffusion method for protein delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 85, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pang, Y.X.; Sun, Y.N.; Luo, Y.L.; Zhou, M.S.; Qiu, X.Q.; Yi, C.H.; Lou, H.M. Preparation of novel all-lignin microcapsules via interfacial cross-linking of pickering emulsion. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 167, 113468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pan, X.; Li, Y.S.; Pang, W.L.; Xue, Y.Q.; Wang, Z.X.; Jiang, C.P.; Shen, C.Y.; Liu, Q.; Liu, L. Preparation, characterisation and comparison of glabridin-loaded hydrogel-forming microneedles by chemical and physical cross-linking. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 617, 121612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coimbra, P.; Gil, M.H.; Figueiredo, M. Tailoring the properties of gelatin films for drug delivery applications: Influence of the chemical cross-linking method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tan, X.; Qiu, T.T.; Li. R., N.; Zhou, L.S.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Chen, S.S.; Zhang, H.C. Recent Progress in the Preparation and Application of Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Antimicrobial in Foods. Food Chem. 2020, 41, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhujbal, S.V.; Pathak, V.; Zemlyanov, D.Y.; Taylor, L.S.; Zhou, Q.T. Physical stability and dissolution of lumefantrine amorphous solid dispersions produced by spray anti-solvent precipitation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 110, 2423–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xiong, W.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, F.; Yu, S.; Ye, T.; Pan, W.; Yang, X. Auricularia auricular polysaccharide-low molecular weight chitosan polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles: Preparation and characterization. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xiong, W.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Pan, W.; Yang, X. Design and evaluation of a novel potential carrier for a hydrophilic antitumor drug: Auricularia auricular polysaccharide-chitosan nanoparticles as a delivery system for doxorubicin hydrochloride. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 511, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schenck, L.; Lowinger, M.; Troup, G.; Li, L.; McKelvey, C. Achieving a Hot Melt Extrusion Design Space for the Production of Solid Solutions. Chem. Eng. Pharm. Ind. 2019, 19, 469–487. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kakran, M.; Sahoo, N.G.; Lin, L.; Judeh, Z. Fabrication of quercetin nanoparticles by anti-solvent precipitation method for enhanced dissolution. Powder Technol. 2012, 223, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.Y.; Liu, K.; Zha, X.Q.; Li, Q.M.; Pan, L.H.; Luo, J.P. Encapsulation of luteolin using oxidized lotus root starch nanoparticles prepared by antisolvent precipitation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Charoenchaitrakool, M.; Roubroum, T.; Sudsakorn, K. Processing of a novel mefenamic acid–paracetamol–nicotinamide cocrystal using gas anti-solvent process. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 62, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, X.D.; Neuperger, E.; Dey, S.K. Insights into the synthesis of layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanoparticles: Part 1. Optimization and controlled synthesis of chloride-intercalated LDH. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 459, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Xu, S.; Lin, Y.; Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L. Construction of high strength hollow fibers by self-assembly of a stiff polysaccharide with short branches in water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 4198–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Markwalter, C.E.; Prud’Homme, R.K. Design of a small-scale multi-inlet vortex mixer for scalable nanoparticle production and application to the encapsulation of biologics by inverse flash nanoprecipitation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 107, 2465–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Galindo-Rodriguez, S.; Alle’mann, S.E.; Fessi, H.; Doelker, E. Physicochemical parameters associated with nanoparticle formation in the salting salting-out, emulsifification– diffusion, and nanoprecipitation methods. Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 1428–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qin, Y.; Xiong, L.; Li, M.; Liu, J.; Wu, H.; Qiu, H.W.; Mu, H.Y.; Xu, X.F.; Sun, Q.J. Preparation of bioactive polysaccharide nanoparticles with enhanced radical scavenging activity and antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4373–4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, X.H.; Fu, Y.J.; Miao, F.W.; Yu, Q.S.; Liu, N.; Zhang, F.S. Efficient separation of functional xylooligosaccharide, cellulose and lignin from poplar via thermal acetic acid/sodium acetate hydrolysis and subsequent kraft pulping. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 153, 112575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, H.V.; Campbell, K.; Painter, G.F.; Young, S.L.; Walker, G.F. Nanoparticle system based on amino-dextran as a drug delivery vehicle: Immune-stimulatory cpg-oligonucleotide loading and delivery. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yin, H.; Zhao, X.; Tong, L.L.; Wang, Z. In vitro and in vivo anti-hyperglycemic effects of polysaccharides from Auricularia auricular. Food Chem. 2015, 36, 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chopra, S.; Motwani, S.K.; Iqbal, Z.; Talegaonkar, S.; Ahmad, F.J.; Khar, R.K. Optimisation of polyherbal gels for vaginal drug delivery by Box–Behnken statistical design. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007, 67, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fabre, E.; Vale, C.; Pereira, E.; Silva, C.M. Experimental measurement and modeling of Hg(ii) removal from aqueous solutions using Eucalyptus globulus bark: Effect of pH, salinity and biosorbent dosage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shuang, Z.; Rong, C.; Yu, L.; Feng, X.; Wu, X. Extraction of a soluble polysaccharide from Auricularia polytricha and evaluation of its anti-hypercholesterolemic effect in rats. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei, Z.; Wang, H.; Xin, G.; Zeng, Z.; Huang, W. A pH-sensitive prodrug nanocarrier based on diosgenin for doxorubicin delivery to efficiently inhibit tumor metastasis. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 6545–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ghasemi, S.; Jafari, S.M.; Assadpour, E.; Khomeiri, M. Nanoencapsulation of d-limonene within nanocarriers produced by pectin-whey protein complexes. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 77, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, K.; Chen, C.; Huang, Q.; Li, C.; Fu, X. Preparation and characterization of Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticles with enhanced antioxidant activity and adsorption capacity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 208, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, B.; Wu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Yang, Q.; Kan, J. High-pressure ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from hovenia dulcis: Extraction, structure, antioxidant activity and hypoglycemic. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bao, H.; Zhou, R.; You, S.; Wu, S.; Wang, Q.; Cui, S.W. Gelation mechanism of polysaccharides from Auricularia auricula-judae. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 76, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cc, A.; Chao, L.; Qc, B.; Qiang, H.; Memp, C.; Xiong, F. Physicochemical characterization, potential antioxidant and hypoglycemic activity of polysaccharide from Sargassum pallidum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, R.Y.; Li, L.; Ma, C.X.; Ettoumi, F.; Javed, M.; Lin, X.Y.; Shao, X.F.; Xiao, G.S.; Luo, Z.S. Shape-controlled fabrication of zein and peach gum polysaccharide based complex nanoparticles by anti-solvent precipitation for curcumin-loaded Pickering emulsion stabilization. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 25, 100565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qian, J.Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.M.; Zhang, H. Adulteration identification of some fungal polysaccharides with SEM, XRD, IR and optical rotation: A primary approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, M.W.; Yeo, S.D. Antisolvent crystallization of carbamazepine from organic solutions. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012, 90, 2202–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ren, Y.; Liu, S. Effects of separation and purification on structural characteristics of polysaccharide from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 522, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, Y.D.; Wang, L.L.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Characterization of polysaccharide fractions from Allii macrostemonis bulbus and assessment of their antioxidant. LWT 2022, 165, 113687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, Y.Q.; Liu, N.Y.; Li, D.L.; Ren, Y.Y.; Dong, X.T.; Yang, L.; Wang, L.B. Functional properties, structure and anti-glycosylation activity of polysaccharide from blue honeysuckle fruit. Food Chem. 2020, 41, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ribeiro, A.M.; Ramalho, E.; Neto, M.P.; Pilo, R.M. Thermogravimetric analysis of high-density cork granules using isoconversional methods. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xiao, J.B.; Jiang, H.A. review on the structure-function relationship aspect of polysaccharides from tea materials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2015, 55, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singhal, P.; Satya, S.; Naik, S.N. Fermented bamboo shoots: A complete nutritional, anti-nutritional and antioxidant profile of the sustainable and functional food to food security. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2021, 3, 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, C.; Fu, X. Spheroidization on Fructus Mori polysaccharides to enhance bioavailability and bioactivity by anti-solvent precipitation method. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, D.W.; Lee, W.J.; Asmelash Gebru, Y.; Choi, H.S.; Yeo, S.H.; Jeong, Y.J. Comparison of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of maclura tricuspidata fruit extracts at different maturity stages. Molecules 2019, 24, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Machmudah, S.; Winardi, S.; Wahyudiono; Kanda, H.; Goto, M. Formation of Curcuma xanthorrhiza extract microparticles using supercritical anti solvent precipitation. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 3129–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, R.; Thakur, A.K.; Chaudhari, P.; Banerjee, N. Particle size reduction techniques of pharmaceutical compounds for the enhancement of their dissolution rate and bioavailability. J. Pharm. Innov. 2022, 17, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kwaw, E.; Ma, Y.; Tchabo, W.; Apaliya, M.T.; Wu, M.; Sackey, A.S.; Xiao, L.; Tahir, H. Effect of lactobacillus strains on phenolic profile, color attributes and antioxidant activities of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice. Food Chem. 2018, 250, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, Y.; Meng, A.L.; Liu, P.; Chen, Y.Y.; Yuan, A.Q.; Dai, Y.M.; Ye, K.Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Li, Z.M. Reflux extraction optimization and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from Pleioblastus amarus (Keng) shell. Molecules 2022, 27, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 07037 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of (a) different concentration of AAP, (b) solution pH levels and (c) antisolvent: solvent (v/v) ratios on the mean average particle size and PDI of AAP-NPs. Three independent experiments were carried out for each analysis. The data were measured by zetasizer, and results were expressed as a mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with different letters are those found to be significantly different in the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of (a) different concentration of AAP, (b) solution pH levels and (c) antisolvent: solvent (v/v) ratios on the mean average particle size and PDI of AAP-NPs. Three independent experiments were carried out for each analysis. The data were measured by zetasizer, and results were expressed as a mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with different letters are those found to be significantly different in the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Molecules 27 07037 g001
Molecules 27 07037 g002 550
Figure 2. Three-dimensional response surface diagrams of (a–c) Model 1 and (d–f) Model 2.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional response surface diagrams of (a–c) Model 1 and (d–f) Model 2.
Molecules 27 07037 g002
Molecules 27 07037 g003 550
Figure 3. AAP-NP particle size distributions (a) intensity; (b) number. Records 1 to 3 represent the repeated experiments.
Figure 3. AAP-NP particle size distributions (a) intensity; (b) number. Records 1 to 3 represent the repeated experiments.
Molecules 27 07037 g003
Molecules 27 07037 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of AAP (a,b) and AAP-NPs (c,d) with scale bars of 500 nm and 200 nm, respectively.
Figure 4. SEM images of AAP (a,b) and AAP-NPs (c,d) with scale bars of 500 nm and 200 nm, respectively.
Molecules 27 07037 g004
Molecules 27 07037 g005 550
Figure 5. FTIR images of AAP-NPs prepared at the optimal conditions and those of the original AAP.
Figure 5. FTIR images of AAP-NPs prepared at the optimal conditions and those of the original AAP.
Molecules 27 07037 g005
Molecules 27 07037 g006 550
Figure 6. X-ray diffractograms of AAP-NPs and AAP.
Figure 6. X-ray diffractograms of AAP-NPs and AAP.
Molecules 27 07037 g006
Molecules 27 07037 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) and (b) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of AAP-NPs and AAP.
Figure 7. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) and (b) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of AAP-NPs and AAP.
Molecules 27 07037 g007
Molecules 27 07037 g008 550
Figure 8. In vitro antioxidant activity of AAP-NPs, original AAP and VC, including (a) DPPH radical scavenging activity and (b) ABTS+ radical scavenging activity.
Figure 8. In vitro antioxidant activity of AAP-NPs, original AAP and VC, including (a) DPPH radical scavenging activity and (b) ABTS+ radical scavenging activity.
Molecules 27 07037 g008
Molecules 27 07037 g009 550
Figure 9. Formation of AAP-NPs via antisolvent precipitation.
Figure 9. Formation of AAP-NPs via antisolvent precipitation.
Molecules 27 07037 g009
Table
Table 1. BBD experiment design and results.
Table 1. BBD experiment design and results.
No.Experiment DesignExperimental Results
(A) AAP Concentration (%)(B) pH(C) Antisolvent: Solvent
(v:v)		(Y1) Average Size
(nm)		(Y2) PDI
10.585:1184.900.352
20.587:1178.500.312
30.576:1174.300.310
40.596:1179.870.318
5175:1169.970.247
6197:1173.970.245
7195:1166.950.223
8177:1163.200.212
9186:1153.970.142
10186:1152.700.136
11186:1153.000.138
12186:1154.500.142
13186:1151.180.155
141.585:1176.570.250
151.587:1176.270.298
161.576:1173.570.302
171.596:1168.400.245
Table
Table 2. Variance analysis results of regression models.
Table 2. Variance analysis results of regression models.
Sources of VarianceModel 1 Average Size/(nm)Model 2 PDI
Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value Prob > FSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value Prob > F
Model1918.269213.1499.86<0.0001 **0.08499.29 × 10−358.63<0.0001 **
A-AAP concentration (%)49.05149.0522.980.002 **4.03 × 10−314.03 × 10−325.460.0015 **
B-pH11.59111.595.430.05263.19 × 10−313.19 × 10−320.140.0028 **
Antisolvent: solvent (v:v)12.14112.145.690.0485 *4.01 × 10−514.01 × 10−50.250.6303
AB29.04129.0413.610.0078 **8.91 × 10−418.91 × 10−45.630.0495 *
AC9.3019.304.360.07521.94 × 10−311.94 × 10−312.220.01 *
BC52.09152.0924.410.0017 **7.17 × 10−417.17 × 10−44.530.071
A21044.6411044.64489.43<0.0001 **5.20 × 10−215.20 × 10−2328.73<0.0001 **
B2100.251100.2546.970.0002 **6.92 × 10−316.92 × 10−343.690.0003 **
C2441.401441.40206.8<0.0001 **1.00 × 10−211.00 × 10−264.35<0.0001 **
Residual14.9472.13 1.11 × 10−371.58 × 10−4
Lack of fit8.3732.791.70.30398.90 × 10−432.97 × 10−40.610.6434
Pure error6.5741.64 2.19 × 10−445.48 × 10−5
Total error1933.2016 8.08 × 10−416
R20.9923 0.9869
R a d j 2 0.9823 0.9701
C.V.%0.87 5.31
Adeq. precision27.915 21.493
Note: * p < 0.05 indicates significant difference; ** p < 0.01 indicates a highly significant difference.
Table
Table 3. BBD level table and coding of experimental factors.
Table 3. BBD level table and coding of experimental factors.
FactorsCoded SymbolsLevels
−101
AAP concentrationA0.511.5
pH valueB789
Antisolvent: solvent ratio (v/v)C5:16:17:1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, R.; Min, H.; Zhang, S.; Hu, S. Formation Optimization, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Auricularia auricula-judae Polysaccharide Nanoparticles Obtained via Antisolvent Precipitation. Molecules 2022, 27, 7037. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207037

AMA Style

Dai Y, Ma Y, Liu X, Gao R, Min H, Zhang S, Hu S. Formation Optimization, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Auricularia auricula-judae Polysaccharide Nanoparticles Obtained via Antisolvent Precipitation. Molecules. 2022; 27(20):7037. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Yemei, Yuan Ma, Xiaocui Liu, Ruyun Gao, Hongmei Min, Siyu Zhang, and Siyu Hu. 2022. "Formation Optimization, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Auricularia auricula-judae Polysaccharide Nanoparticles Obtained via Antisolvent Precipitation" Molecules 27, no. 20: 7037. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop