1. Introduction
The soil organic amendments produced from biomass or living organisms typically include compost, biochar, wood chips, charcoal, animal manure, straw, husk, geotextiles, sewage sludge, digestate, and hemicellulose waste from paper production [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7]. These compounds are rich in plant nutrients and contain high levels of organic matter, macro- and microelements that improve soil fertility by enhancing microclimatic conditions and providing microbial growth substrates [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17]. The incorporation of soil amendments can be beneficial in the production of
Miscanthus × giganteus J.M. Greef & Deuter ex Hodkinson & Renvoize
(Angiospermae: Poaceae) (
M × g) in poor soils by increasing soil fertility and maximising crop yield [
1].
M × g has a relatively high biomass yield and cellulose content compared with other lignocellulosic bioenergy crops [
18], which makes it one of the most promising feedstocks for the production of biofuels [
19] and bioproducts: fibres, insulation materials, and papers [
20]. The cultivation of
M × g on the slightly contaminated or marginal lands has environmental and economic benefits: in addition to the remediation potential [
21,
22], the plant demonstrates high efficiency in carbon sequestration [
23].
Sewage sludge is a widely used soil amendment of
M × g cultivation proposed to improve the biomass production on agricultural, marginal and slightly contaminated by trace elements land [
2,
3,
4]. The application of this amendment ensures high crop yields and biomass quality that can be used as raw material for energy and bio-products and improves soil health.
There is a close connection between biochar and bioenergy production: this amendment can be produced from the residues of bioenergy crops, generated during biochar production, and biochar can be applied to fields where energy crops including
M × g are grown [
5,
6]. Due to the ability of biochar to restore and remediate deteriorated soils [
7], it is widely touted as a valuable land management tool with great potential to mitigate climate change [
8]. Its application can improve soil quality in a variety of ways, including increasing soil water holding capacity and crop yield, raising pH, and increasing crop yield [
8]. Biochar amendment affects soil structure and function [
9], mainly by altering nutrient cycling [
10] and influencing soil microbial communities [
11].
During the production of energy crops on marginal land, another substance positively influencing soil fertility and biomass is the digestate from agricultural biogas plants [
12]. It can be used directly or processed into the amendment, the latter approach is more sustainable and beneficial to the environment [
13].
The use of paper mill sludge to improve soil quality and increase crop yield has been reported [
14,
15,
16], but caution should be exercised when using it as an amendment. The main concern of using the sludge is related to its content of industrially-derived contaminants of trace elements. As a result, the incorporation of this amendment may lead to new (secondary) contamination of the soil by contaminants presented in the sludge [
17].
While using soil amendments to increase
M × g production on marginal land, it is necessary to investigate the regulation of soil quality, which can be done by studying the soil biota. Nematodes are a dominant component of the soil biota and serve as primary, secondary, and tertiary consumers in soil food webs, thus reflecting their complexity. These organisms, which live in soil microecosystems, are sensitive to environmental changes and can be proposed as valuable bioindicators for soil health assessment [
24,
25]. The abundance and diversity of soil nematode communities can be used to holistically assess biotic and functional soil conditions due to the use of organic amendments [
26].
Subterranean nematodes are represented by two groups: plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) or herbivores that parasitise and damage plants and free-living nematodes (FLNs) [
27] providing the various ecosystem services, e.g., nutrient cycling [
28,
29], microbial redistribution in the soil profile [
30], and insect control [
31]. FLNs are classified as fungivores, bacterivores, predators, and omnivores that can be beneficial for soil fertility and ecosystem function [
27,
32].
Numerous studies have investigated the effects of organic amendments and fertilisers on soil nematodes [
33,
34,
35,
36,
37]. Organic amendments were proposed for the management of PPN populations [
38,
39]. Composted sewage sludge and fly ash from coal combustion had the potential to control populations of root-knot [
40] and cyst nematodes [
41,
42]. Some studies on the effects of biosolids on nematode communities illustrated existed disparity in results. Nematode abundance and diversity were significantly affected by five different sewage sludge treatments in five soil types [
43]. The most evident response to sewage sludge application was seen in bacterivores, with a negative correlation between the sewage sludge dose and nematode communities.
The effects of biochar on soil nematodes are less well studied [
44], and results illustrated different responses of PPNs to the treatment. Biochar incorporation reduced the abundance of the stubby-root nematode
Trichodorus sp. [
45] in maize crops and the migratory endoparasite nematode
Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb in carrot crops [
46]. Five-year monitoring of the impact of biochar and manure added to low fertile yellow cinnamon soil showed significant decreasing of PPNs levels. Moreover, the strong dominance of bacterivores was caused by increasing the soil productivity, which increased wheat yield [
47]. Wanjiku Kamau et al. [
45] observed a significant reduction in bacterivorous nematodes during maize vegetation in biochar-enriched soils. Microbial and bacterivore alterations could explain PPNs suppression mechanisms that occurred in biochar-enriched soils [
48]. The addition of biochar to rice potting soils reduced the crop’s susceptibility to the root-knot nematode
Meloidogyne graminicola Golden & Birchfield [
49]. In some cases [
50,
51] biochar did not impact to the potato cyst nematode
Globodera sp., while neutral and negative effects were determined for the root-knot nematode (
Meloidogyne sp.) [
44,
51,
52]. Several studies [
53,
54] explored the effect of biogas digestate (D) and hemicellulose waste from paper production (HW) on soil nematodes. It was shown that the combined treatment of soil with HW and urea reduced the population of soybean nematodes under greenhouse conditions [
53]. The addition of D showed the potential to limit infestations of
Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid & White and
Pratylenchus penetrans [
54].
In our previous study [
4], the impact of soil amendments and agricultural practices on soil nematode community under
M × g cultivation was investigated, while the post-military Pb-contaminated land was amended with biosolid from the wastewater treatment plant in combination with tillage treatment. The results showed that three-year crop growth affected the soil nematode community, which was highest in two exploited cases: tillage and tillage + biosolids. In the control case without agronomic practices, the nematode community diversity was enriched by increased populations of herbivores, omnivores and predators.
We are not aware of any systematic study that comprehensively addresses the assemblage and diversity of the soil nematode community during the cultivation of M × g on marginal land amended with various organic soil amendments. The main goal of the current study was to evaluate the short-term (one vegetation season) effect of soil amendments of different origins on the composition and diversity of the nematode community under M × g growth on marginal land. The following organic amendments were used: biochar in doses of 5 and 10% (BD1 and BD2), biogas digestate (D), sewage sludge (SS), and hemicellulose waste (HW).
3. Results
An average of 984 nematodes per 100 g of dry soil were detected in all treatments right after planting
M × g, this value was 1472 at the end of vegetation. 28 nematode taxa were identified, including 5 bacterivorous genera, 4 fungivorous genera, 5 herbivorous genera (11 species), 2 omnivorous genera, and 5 predatory genera (
Table S2). The abundance of different nematode taxa was tested as a function of sampling time and amendment type (
Table 4). These two effects explained up to 90% of the variation in the nematode population (
Table 5). The abundance of
Filenchus and
Dorylaimus was higher in Pf1 than in Pf2, while the abundance of
Cephalobus,
Panagrolaimus,
Aphelenchus,
Ditylenchus,
Filenchus, and
Dorylaimus was lower in Pf1 than in Pf2.
The application of BD1 and BD2 reduced the abundance of 10 and 13 taxa, respectively. An increase in abundance was observed for only one taxon, Enchodelus sp. for both treatments BD1 and BD2. The application of D decreased the abundance of 12 taxa, while 4 taxa increased. SS decreased the abundance of 17 taxa, while an increase was observed only for Coomanus sp. The greatest effect of soil amendment on nematode abundance was observed for HW: a decrease in abundance was observed for 19 taxa and an increase for 4 taxa.
EIs were calculated to measure the susceptibility of the nematode community to environmental change by selecting appropriate principal components (PC1–PC4) with eigenvalues greater than 1 (
Table 6). The first 4 components captured 89.6% of the variation in the indices. PC1 explained a maximum of 48.1% of the data variation, correlated positively with maturity, SI, the proportion of herbivores, predators, omnivores, and migratory endoparasites and negatively with the ratio of PPI and MI, ectoparasites, BI, enrichment footprint, and the proportions of fungivores and bacterivores. Thus, the variation in nematodes in PC1 could be determined by the maturity of the nematode community. PC2 captured 25.8% of the community variation, it correlated negatively with CI and positively with EI, total biomass, footprints of composite, structure, and omnivores. Nematode variation in PC2 could be determined as the biomass of the nematode community increased as omnivores increased. PC4 explained 6.8% of the variation and correlated positively with predator footprint. This component determined a change in the structure of trophic groups, which was associated with a variation in the importance of herbivores, bacterivores and predators.
PC1–PC4 scores were affected individually by sampling time during the growing season and the amendments type (
Table S3,
Figure S1). The effects of the growing season and the amendments treatments were significant for PC1–PC3 (
Table S4). Nematode community structure did not differ in sampling time Pf1 and Pf2, while in Pi a statistically significant increase in PC2 and PC3 was observed. The addition of BD1 and BD2 increased PC2 compared to the control; the incorporation of D decreased PC1 and increased PC2 and PC3. The application of SS increased PC1-PC3, and PC2 increased with the addition of HW.
The length of the largest gradient identified by the detrended correspondence analysis was less than 2 (1.68), and the partial redundancy analysis (pRDA) was applied as an ordination procedure to examine trends in the variability of community composition for each treatment by soil amendments (
Figure 1). The pRDA was statistically significant and explained a large portion of the community variances (
Radj2 = 0.68,
F = 16.6,
p < 0.001). The total inertia was 0.012 and explained 83% of constrained variables represented by amendments’ treatment categories. The pRDA was useful in elucidating trends in the variability of the nematode community structure among amendments type. The shifts in nematode community composition could be explained by four statistically significant axes, RDA1–RDA4. The RDA1 reflected the variability of the nematode community caused by the influence of HW, and this axis correlated with PC2. The change in nematode community composition caused by HW was due to changes in the number of taxa, such as
Paratylenchus projectus Jenkins,
Pratylenchus fallax Seinhorst,
Aphelenchoides sp.,
Coomansus sp., and
Mylonchulus sp. The RDA2 axis showed the variability in the nematode community composition caused by the effect of D amendments; this axis showed a positive correlation with PC3 and a negative correlation with PC1. D amendments caused the variations in nematode community composition due to changes in the number of taxa such as
Merlinius joctus Thorne. The RDA3 axis showed differences in the nematode community under the effects of treatments compared to the control. The RDA4 axis showed the effect on the nematode community composition caused by SS enrichment. The addition of SS was associated with an increase in PC1 and PC3 scores, while the addition of HW had the opposite effect.
Using a scatter plot between SI and EI, the food web of soil nematodes into four possible states after the application of soil amendments was classified, namely: disturbed/enriched, matured/enriched, structured/stable, and degraded/depleted. A nematode community characterised by low EI and high SI was likely to be found in healthy soil (
Figure 2). The addition of SS was reflected in a more stable and mature nematode community, and HW treatment resulted in a more mature state of the nematode food web. D treatment resulted in the nematode food web transformation towards a disturbed and degraded state. The effects of BD1 and BD2 treatments were more controversial, and changes in nematode composition at all trophic levels were observed in both the matured and degraded states.
A radar chart was used to assess the ecosystem services of soil nematodes after the application of amendments, which allowed to show the trend of functional metabolic footprints of soil nematodes under the influence of different amendments (
Figure 3). The greatest increase in nematode community biomass and/or activity occurred in HW treatment, with slightly smaller effects in SS, BD1, and BD2 treatments. D treatment had the least stimulatory effect on the ecosystem services of the nematode community. The application of amendments primarily activated the ecosystem service for disease suppression and pest control. It should be mentioned that the effect of amendments on
M × g yield was not statistically significant (
Table S3).
4. Discussion
This study investigated the effect of different organic amendments added to the marginal soil on the nematode community during three stages of the first
M × g. vegetation season. The effect appeared at the level of individual taxa and the community as a whole. Using PCA, the most important patterns affecting the variability of the nematode community were revealed, i.e.: the variation in maturity, as determined by a set of quantified indices, and the ecological processes. Out of four amendments, the application of SS caused increasing in community maturity and change in selected ecological traits, whereas D had the opposite effect. The improvement in the soil nematode community caused by SS amendment indicated a trend toward a more stable and sustained soil ecosystem in marginal soil. Furthermore, since nematodes are suitable indicators for soil monitoring [
4,
69], it can be concluded that the application of SS resulted in healthier soil.
The ecological succession of nematodes is usually orderly and predictable unless set back by environmental disturbance such as cultivation, pollution or nutrient enrichment (incorporation of amendments and fertilisers) [
4]. The impact of amendments on the nematode community and soil food web has been documented in several papers [
47,
70,
71,
72]. Following the addition of amendments, nematodes often undergo a successional transition with a high abundance of colonisers dominating disturbed or enriched habitats characterised by rapid reproduction [
73]. In the current study, testing the short-term effects of soil amendments, maturity increase was associated with increasing nematode biomass with concomitant decreasing in total community abundance, which became more abundant for the fungal-feeder nematodes in the late decomposition stage. This funding is partly consistent with the suggestion that the impact of amendments on soil nematode abundance varies across application years: the short-term presence of organic amendments in the soil affects nematode function [
74], whereas long-term application reduces total abundance and diversity [
75]. Studies have shown that the long-term application of SS has no adverse effects on nematode abundance or diversity [
70,
76]. Nematode community abundance and structure tended to change with higher pollutant levels in SS [
77]. However, total nematode abundance is a poor assessment tool for monitoring soil contamination and has to be modified by a variety of other factors [
78].
The soil pollution [
79] and agricultural practices such as tillage and fertilisation [
4] disrupt the soil ecosystem and stimulate bacterial and fungal activities to which the nematode community responds by reducing MI [
80]. Secondary succession leads to a reduction in trophic conditions and an increase in MI [
66]. However, MI is only a simple indication of environmental disturbance. For a better understanding of the extent of disturbance and the dynamics of the restoration process of the soil ecosystem, it is necessary to integrate the functional guild and taxonomic data [
81]. The use of PCA for a range of indices measuring the extent of ecosystem functions allows a comprehensive assessment of changes in the nematode community and functional diversity.
The enrichment of the soil ecosystem with nutrients leads to a shift in community dominance towards opportunistic coloniser species and returns the community to the earlier stages of successional dynamics [
82]. MI and PPI are two indices that respond in opposite directions when soil nutrient status increases [
83]. The larger the MI, the more the mature the soil ecosystem, and the lower is the degree of impact (PPI). Our results showed that MI and PPI indices changed coherently. This trait illustrated that the nematode community was influenced by enrichment of the soil with nutrients during application of amendments. Additionally, influence of changes in the physical properties of the environment, especially the air and water regimes of the soil, could not be excluded. However, this assumption requires further investigation.
For nematode communities living in the disturbed conditions, the ratio PPI/MI has a value of 1.25; for less disturbed communities it varies between 0.81 and 0.99 [
84]. In the current study the ratio PPI/MI ranged between 1.18–1.26 for all experimental variants except SS, and only SS treatment had a range of 0.86 to 1.00. This indicated that the application of SS promoted the acceleration of succession dynamics of nematode community and stabilised the nutrient dynamics and the community itself. The results showed that fluctuations in community maturity were accompanied by changes in trophic structure. The proportions of PPNs, predators, and omnivores increased with maturity, while the proportion of fungivores and bacterivores decreased. The observed increasing in abundance of PPNs could be due to an increase in migratory endoparasites, which occurred simultaneously with a decrease in the proportion of ectoparasites.
When the community is more mature, the value of SI is higher, and values of BI and EI are lower. The growth of SI indicates the increasing complexity of the food web and the redundancy of the nematode community structure [
85,
86,
87]. When soil is amended by SS, food resources are usually not limited and bacterial reproduction can be rapid and continuous. In such systems, nematode activity supports the active growth of bacterial populations and their distribution over the substrate [
88]. In some cases, the application of SS increases nematode population densities even in highly contaminated soils [
89,
90], as some functional groups and taxa respond primarily to resource availability and have a higher tolerance to environmental stress.
PC2 captured common features of all amendments, stimulating the nematode community biomass, and this trend was strongest for HW treatment. The application of all amendments was characterised by enhancing the ecosystem service for disease and pest suppression. Under the influence of HW, the main trend in nematode community change was maturation due to the community’s ability to respond faster to environmental enrichment with nutrients [
91].
In general, the nature of BDs’ effect was well described by PC2 and appeared to be similar to the effect of HW treatment. The influence of BDs on the community was not unidirectional: a trend was encountered of increasing the trophic structure of the community and its decreasing, illustrating the complex and multidirectional mechanisms of biochar influence on soil biota. Biochar affects soil acidity, which regulates the availability of nutrients to living organisms, ultimately leading to negative impacts on soil organisms [
92]. The observed positive effect of biochar on crop yields may be due to improvement of water retention in the soil [
93], which is more pronounced in nutrient-poor and acidic soils [
94], as in our case the research soil had a pH equal to 4.7.
Biochar has a physical and chemical impact on the soil that initiates the dynamics of biological processes [
95,
96,
97]. The microbial community changes with the incorporation of biochar [
98,
99], which affects the intensity of mineralisation of soil organic matter [
100,
101]. However, the medium-term field mesosome study provides evidence [
102] that amendment by biochar does not affect the basic physicochemical and microbial soil properties, however, can change the nematode community: despite biochar does not affect total nematode abundance, taxa richness and total plant biomass, a taxonomic and functional shift in the nematode community is observed, influenced by biochar application rate (30 vs. 5 t ha
−1). The low application rate promotes predatory and PPNs, while the high application rate favours bacterivores and fungivores. These published results [
102] are partly consistent with the current study’s observation.
All tested amendments caused the suppression of PPNs, and following several studies [
48,
103,
104,
105], this fact demonstrated that amendments produced from waste and plant residues can control PPN populations. However, the incorporation of organic amendments into the soil does not necessarily reduce the number of PPNs [
106,
107,
108], and even sometimes can increase it [
109,
110]. Chemical and biological mechanisms are responsible for the suppression of fungivores by soil amendments, such as the release of nematotoxic compounds originally presented in the incorporated materials, their generation during degradation in the soil, or the development of microbial antagonists of PPNs.
Our study showed that the application of different soil amendments on marginal land was likely to reduce the number of PPNs and provided pest control benefits. This is important funding in terms of growing concern that if the cultivation of energy crops such as
M × g expands, the harboured PPNs may be able to cause crop damage [
111]. The results ensured that the mechanisms affecting the soil biota under soil amendments and
M × g cultivation are complex, multidirectional, and required long-term multi-year observation.
We did not observe any significant effect of amendments on
M × g yield after the first vegetation (
Table S5) which was not surprising, as
M × g biomass is usually too low and economically invisible in the first 2–3 years of production; the intensity of biomass growth commonly accelerates in the subsequent years [
18]. Simultaneously, during the first years, the plant can produce a considerable mass of underground organs: roots and short, vigorous rhizomes that can quickly reinforce the topsoil.