Next Article in Journal
Insect Predation Estimate Using Binary Leaf Models and Image-Matching Shapes
Previous Article in Journal
Meeting the Challenges Facing Wheat Production: The Strategic Research Agenda of the Global Wheat Initiative
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Short-Term Effects of Amendments on Nematode Communities and Diversity Patterns under the Cultivation of Miscanthus × giganteus on Marginal Land
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth: Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops

by
Valentina Pidlisnyuk
1,* and
Željka Zgorelec
2,*
1
Department of Environmental Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Environment, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, Pasteurova 3632/15, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
2
Division for Agroecology, Department of General Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2768; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112768
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
This editorial belongs to the Special Issue “Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth: Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops”.
The harmonious development of renewable energy sources, including biomass, is becoming increasingly important nowadays as a contribution to energy security. In this regard, second-generation energy crops are attracted a special attention. These groups of plants can be cultivated on the different lands including marginal, with receiving lignocellulose biomass used for energy production; a substantial contribution to the alleviation of climate change is ensured if high yields can be sustained [1].
The production of energy crops’ biomass requires appropriate policies to secure long-term support to improve crop productivity and to ensure the environmental, economic, and social benefits of the cropping systems [2]. Additionally, second-generation energy crops are successfully applied in the phytoremediation processes of contaminated lands [3,4,5]. The green technology approach to contaminated sites implies a union of phytoremediation with biomass production, i.e., phytomanagement [6]. In order to benefit the soil and to ensure proper biomass harvest, the production of energy crops has to be supported by soil amendments, PGRs, fertilization, microorganisms, and retaining nutrients. Evaluating the impact of these factors on the production cycle and phytoremediation process from the theoretical and practical points of view is very important. The Special Issue of Agronomy titled “Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth:” Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops” brought together original scientific articles dealing with these topics.
Stefanovska et al. [7] investigated the short-term effects of soil amendments, such as biochar, sewage sludge, biogas digestate, and hemicellulose waste, on the harvest value as well as the structure, diversity, and function of a nematode community during the production of the second-generation energy crop Miscanthus × giganteus (M × g) on marginal land in a plantation located in Chomutov, the Czech Republic. In total, 28 nematode taxa were identified, including 5 bacterivores genera, 4 fungivores genera, 5 herbivores genera (11 species), 2 omnivores genera, and 5 predators’ genera. The incorporation of amendments affected the nematode food web and resulted in the suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs), which is an important finding for multiyear Mxg production.
Šurić et al. [8] researched the impact of application rate of a soil amendment—sewage sludge—on the biomass yield of the energy crop Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita L.) cultivated in the trace elements (TEs) contaminated soil. The following amounts of amendments were under consideration: 1.66, 3.32, and 6.64 t ha−1 DM. Results showed that with increasing the application rate a biomass yield had a positive trend. The incorporation of sewage sludge did not change the content of cellulose in the aboveground biomass; however, this amendment impacted to the content of hemicellulose: it was increased by 2.5% with an application of 6.64 t ha−1 and by 7.5% with an application of 1.66 t ha−1 of sewage sludge, consequently. When the dose of applied sewage sludge increased, the uptake of TEs, i.e., Cu, Ni, and Mo to biomass of Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita L.) decreased.
The influence of several plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) isolated from TEs-contaminated soil, namely, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia KP-13, Bacillus altitudinis KP-14, Pseudomonas fluorescens KP-16, and their consortia on the phytoremediation of M × g cultivated in the same TEs-contaminated soil was studied in [9]. Contrary to expectations, the effects of PGPB on the biomass harvest were low. The most significant increase was detected in leaves biomass treated with a consortium of tested PGPBs. The phytoparameters, i.e., translocation factor, comprehensive bioconcentration index, and uptake index, were used to characterize the behavior of Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, V, and Pb in the presence of isolates. Plants treated with PGPB strains accumulated minimal concentrations of Cu and Pb in the aboveground biomass, with a tendency for Zn to accumulate in the leaves and stems, and Sr to accumulate in the leaves. The results revealed the combinations of isolates that stimulated the minimal uptake of TEs into the stems with simultaneous increasing of DW. This study provides more insight into the leading factors of M × g phytoremediation supported by PGPB and can be helpful when the crop is cultivated on TEs-contaminated soils of different origins.
Biological carbon sequestration and sustainable nitrogen management are important tools for mitigation and adaptation to climate change. This SI contains two studies conducted in Croatia, where the status of macronutrients (C and N) in agricultural soils and soils contaminated by Hg and Cd were investigated during the growing of M × g. The authors researched the influence of soil amendments (sewage sludge, mycorrhiza, and ash) [10] and the selection of planting material (rhizomes (M × gR) and seedlings (M × gS)) [11] on the yield and N status of M × g leaves. It was shown that over seven years of vegetation (2016–2022), the total soil carbon content (TSCC) was 1.7 times higher in M × gS than in M × gR, which led to the conclusion that in the similar agroecological conditions, seedlings were more preferable over rhizomes because of much bigger carbon sequestration effect [11]. The application of the proximal spectroscopy method in VNIR spectra as a non-destructive method and the suitability of this approach to the determination of N status in the leaf (R2 = 0.87) was confirmed; however, the approach did not work for yield (R2 = 0.53) [10].
In the above-overviewed articles, the advanced scientific progress and the explored developments are presented. Therefore, we believe that the SI will serve as useful reference material for researchers involved in the production and utilization of the second-generation energy crops and phytoremediation processes.
We would like to express our appreciation and heartfelt thanks to all authors who contributed to the SI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.P.; methodology, V.P. and Ž.Z.; resources, V.P. and Ž.Z.; data curation, V.P. and Ž.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.P. and Ž.Z.; writing—review and editing, V.P. and Ž.Z.; visualization, V.P. and Ž.Z.; supervision, V.P.; project administration, V.P.; funding acquisition, V.P. and Ž.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Aigerim Mamirova, UJEP, for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Canadell, J.G.; Schulze, E.D. Global Potential of Biospheric Carbon Management for Climate Mitigation. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Souza, G.M.; Viktoria, R.L.; Joly, C.A.; Verdade, L.M. (Eds.) Bioenergy & Sustainability: Bridging the Gaps; SCOPE: Paris, France, 2015; Volume 72, ISBN 978-2-9545557-0-6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pidlisnyuk, V.V.; Erickson, L.; Stefanovska, T.; Popelka, J.; Hettiarachchi, G.; Davis, L.; Trögl, J. Potential Phytomanagement of Military Polluted Sites and Biomass Production Using Biofuel Crop Miscanthus × giganteus. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kononchuk, O.; Pidlisnyuk, V.; Mamirova, A.; Khomenchuk, V.; Herts, A.; Grycová, B.; Klemencová, K.; Leštinský, P.; Shapoval, P. Evaluation of the Impact of Varied Biochars Produced from M. × giganteus Waste and Application Rate on the Soil Properties and Physiological Parameters of Spinacia Oleracea L. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pidlisnyuk, V.; Herts, A.; Khomenchuk, V.; Mamirova, A.; Kononchuk, O.; Ust’ak, S. Dynamic of Morphological and Physiological Parameters and Variation of Soil Characteristics during Miscanthus × giganteus Cultivation in the Diesel-Contaminated Land. Agronomy 2021, 11, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Robinson, B.H.; Bañuelos, G.; Conesa, H.M.; Evangelou, M.W.H.; Schulin, R. The Phytomanagement of Trace Elements in Soil. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2009, 28, 240–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stefanovska, T.; Skwiercz, A.; Pidlisnyuk, V.; Zhukov, O.; Kozacki, D.; Mamirova, A.; Newton, R.A.; Ust’ak, S. The Short-Term Effects of Amendments on Nematode Communities and Diversity Patterns under the Cultivation of Miscanthus × giganteus on Marginal Land. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Šurić, J.; Brandić, I.; Peter, A.; Bilandžija, N.; Leto, J.; Karažija, T.; Kutnjak, H.; Poljak, M.; Voća, N. Wastewater Sewage Sludge Management via Production of the Energy Crop Virginia Mallow. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pidlisnyuk, V.; Mamirova, A.; Pranaw, K.; Stadnik, V.; Kuráň, P.; Trögl, J.; Shapoval, P. Miscanthus × giganteus Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Trace Elements as Influenced by the Presence of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Agronomy 2022, 12, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Šestak, I.; Bilandžija, N.; Perčin, A.; Fadljević, I.; Hrelja, I.; Zgorelec, Ž. Assessment of the Impact of Soil Contamination with Cadmium and Mercury on Leaf Nitrogen Content and Miscanthus Yield Applying Proximal Spectroscopy. Agronomy 2022, 12, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bilandžija, N.; Zgorelec, Ž.; Pezo, L.; Grubor, M.; Velaga, A.G.; Krička, T. Solid Biofuels Properites of Miscanthus × giganteus Cultivated on Contaminated Soil after Phytoremediation Process. J. Energy Inst. 2022, 101, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pidlisnyuk, V.; Zgorelec, Ž. Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth: Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2768. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112768

AMA Style

Pidlisnyuk V, Zgorelec Ž. Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth: Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2768. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112768

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pidlisnyuk, Valentina, and Željka Zgorelec. 2022. "Impact of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil on Plant Growth: Case of the Second-Generation Energy Crops" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2768. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112768

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop