Next Article in Journal
Metastasis-Free Survival in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan (MSUG94 Group)
Previous Article in Journal
Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib and Platin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: How to Choose Among Them and When Is Monotherapy with Osimertinib Still the Best Option?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 33
Issue 1
10.3390/curroncol33010055
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Targeting the Uncommon: A Case Report of Osimertinib Response in Advanced NSCLC Patient with Dual EGFR (E701fs and L702fs) Frameshift Deletions

by
Angel Kwan Qi Wong
1,
Saqib Raza Khan
2,3,
Danial Khan Hadi
2,3,
Daniel Breadner
2,3 and
Mark David Vincent
2,3,*
1
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
2
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
3
Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010055
Submission received: 9 December 2025 / Revised: 14 January 2026 / Accepted: 16 January 2026 / Published: 18 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Thoracic Oncology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, and most cases are non-small cell lung cancer types. Some patients have changes in their cancer genes (alterations) that can be treated with special (targeted) medicines instead of conventional chemotherapy. We describe a patient with a very rare type of gene change (EGFR; epidermal growth factor receptor) who responded well to an oral pill known as osimertinib. This case shows that patients with even uncommon, rare gene changes may benefit from this medication.

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers with adenocarcinoma being the most common subtype. Patients with stage IV NSCLC typically have poor prognosis. In these patients, identification of actionable genomic alterations allows for the selection of targeted therapy rather than chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy. EGFR mutations are a common oncogenic driver in NSCLC and are targetable by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, most of the studies primarily focus on common mutations, which are exon 19 deletions (Ex19del) and exon 21 (L858R) point mutations, and there is inconsistent data on efficacy in the treatment of patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. Currently, the first-line treatment for patients with common EGFR mutations involves a third-generation TKI, typically osimertinib. This case describes a 66-year-old gentleman with two uncommon EGFR frameshift deletions (E701fs and L702fs). His tumor staging was denoted as cT3N2M1b, stage IVA. The patient demonstrated a radiological and biochemical response to osimertinib as part of the OCELOT clinical trial (supported by a grant from AstraZeneca), with evidence of tumor marker decline and radiographic improvement within two months of osimertinib treatment initiation. This response has been durable with continued radiological stability and biochemical improvement at 11 months and ongoing. This case will help guide management for patients with this uncommon EGFR mutations and contribute to the scarce literature of EGFR frameshift deletions in advanced NSCLC patients.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide with an estimate of 2.2 million new lung cancer cases (11.4% of all cancers) and 1.8 million deaths (18.0% of all cancer deaths) in 2020 [1,2]. In Canada, lung cancer is both the most diagnosed cancer and cause of cancer death [3]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers, with adenocarcinoma being the most common (50%) subtype [4]. Patients with stage IV NSCLC typically have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival range from 2% to 13% [5,6].
Tobacco smoking is the most important risk factor for lung cancer, with smokers being 10–30 times more likely to have lung cancer than never-smokers [7]. Age is also a risk factor, with the incidence of lung cancer increasing dramatically over 45 years [8]. Notably, up to 25% of NSCLC cases globally occur in never-smokers with this type of presentation being more prevalent in women and Asian populations [9]. This is thought to be linked to environmental risk factors, such as air pollution, occupational exposures, pathogenic germline variants (TP53, ATM, CHEK2, EGFR), or genetic ancestry [4].
Identification of molecular alterations helps guide targeted therapy in both early- and advanced-stage disease [10]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing on tissue samples or via liquid biopsy (circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA]) is now recommended to identify target alterations, such as EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, ROS1 rearrangements, BRAF V600E mutations, NTRK fusions, ERBB2 mutations or HER2 amplifications, MET exon 14 skipping mutations, RET translocations, RAS mutations, and other novel mutations [10]. In patients with stage IV NSCLC, the identification of these actionable genomic alterations (AGA) is clinically relevant for selecting patients who can be treated with targeted drugs upfront, rather than chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy. A recent nationwide database in the United States from 2023 revealed the prevalence of oncogenic drivers in NSCLC as follows: 35.5%, 17.8%, 2.8%, and 2.3% of KRAS, EGFR, ERRB2, and BRAF V600E mutations; and 4.3%, 1.2%, 1.1%, and 0.1% in ALK, RET, ROS1, and NTRK fusions, respectively [11,12]. Additionally, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is also recommended to determine the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors [10].
According to the global guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), determination of treatment for patients with stage IV NSCLC is based on molecular features of tumor tissues, among other factors like histology, PD-L1 expression level, and patient factors, which include ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status and comorbidities [13,14,15,16,17]. The standard of care is then either targeted treatment based on particular AGA or, for AGA-negative cohort, combination chemo-immunotherapy or single-agent immunotherapy [13,14,15,16,17].
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is part of the tyrosine kinase type I receptor family, involved in signaling pathways that contribute to cell proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis (Figure 1) [18]. EGFR mutations are traditionally classified as “typical” (common) or “atypical” (uncommon). The typical EGFR driver mutations are exon 19 deletions (Ex19del) and exon 21 (L858R) point mutations [19,20,21]. Common mutations account for approximately 85% of cases and are sensitive to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) [19,20,21]. Other mutations, such as exon 20 insertions or exon 18 point mutations, have been documented but are less common [19,22]. Recently, the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) system was established, which is an EGFR classification system based on structural analysis. Robichaux et al. examined the response to TKIs in 16,715 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, identifying a structure-function relationship between mutations and drug sensitivity [22]. The groups identified were as follows: classical-like mutations that were distant from the ATP-binding pocket, T790M-like mutations in the hydrophobic core, exon 20 insertions in the loop at the C-terminal end of the αC-helix (Ex20ins-L), and mutations on the interior surface of the ATP-binding pocket or C-terminal end of the αC-helix, which were predicted to be P-loop and αC-helix compressing (PACC) (Table 1) [22]. These locations are structurally critical as this conformational compression stabilizes the active state of EGFR, leading to constitutive signaling even without ligand binding. This eventually impacts drug sensitivity and can make some tumors less sensitive to some EGFR TKI but more responsive to others. Altogether, this study indicated that uncommon EGFR mutations with a classical-like structure had a minimal effect on the overall structure of EGFR; thus, they were sensitive and selective for all classes of EGFR TKIs, both in vitro and in vivo [22].
Currently, first-line therapy for typical EGFR-driven tumors is targeted at treatment, with osimertinib being the most preferred option. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that binds irreversibly to the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, blocking downstream signaling pathways that contribute to cancer growth [14,16,18]. Osimertinib is highly active against EGFR-activating and T790M-resistant mutations [23]. Clinically, it is approved for first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic NSCLC with typical EGFR mutations and for patients who acquire the T790M mutation after earlier-generation TKIs such as afatinib (second-generation) or gefitinib/erlotinib (first-generation). The most clinical benefit has been observed in patients with common (Ex19del and exon 21 point mutations) EGFR mutations, where osimertinib in the 1L setting has demonstrated a survival benefit both with and without chemotherapy [23,24,25].
There is limited data to guide treatment for patients with rare and uncommon EGFR mutations. This study reports a 66-year-old gentleman with stage IV NSCLC who was found to have two uncommon EGFR frameshift deletions (E701fs and L702fs) and responded well to osimertinib as part of the OCELOT clinical trial. Considering these mutations are located in exon 18 and very close to E709, which is classified as a PACC mutations (Table 1), it is arguable that these could also represent PACC mutations. This case will help guide management for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and contribute to the scarce literature of EGFR frameshift deletions in advanced NSCLC patients.

2. Case Presentation

66-year-old gentleman from the Middle East initially presented to the emergency department (ED) in a tertiary care academic hospital, on 15 August 2024, with a four-month history of shortness of breath, now worsening with an increasing cough and a hoarse voice. He denied any fevers, chills, or hemoptysis. He is a lifelong non-smoker who was a professional. His past medical history is significant for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and there is no family history of malignancy. On physical examination, he looked well and rested comfortably. He was in no distress. His vital signs were within normal limits, and his chest was clear to auscultation with normal heart sounds. He underwent relevant investigations, including a chest X-ray, which was suspicious for a lung mass. On further inquiry, he mentioned that he was midway through workup for a lung mass and had a biopsy performed there before he moved to Canada. A subsequent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) confirmed a dominant left upper lobe (LUL)/infrahilar mass measuring 4.5 × 2.8 cm and many millimetric nodules bilaterally (Figure 2). There were multiple sites of lymphadenopathy in the mediastinum, with the largest measuring 1.6 cm in the subcarinal region. Diffuse sclerotic changes were noted on the left 2nd rib and multiple levels of upper thoracic and lower cervical spine vertebrae, consistent with osseous metastasis. The patient was managed conservatively in the ED and referred to outpatient clinic for further management (Figure 3).
The patient was seen at the outpatient clinic facility on 23 September 2024. Over the prior several months, he developed a thoracic backache between the scapulae, some weight loss (estimated 20 pounds), and a cough with no hemoptysis. He admitted to mild shortness of breath on effort and a hoarse voice over the last 5 months. He reported mild anterior sternal pain, not responsive to anti-reflux therapy, and an inguinal hernia, which appeared over the last couple of months, likely related to coughing. The patient also complained of pain in the mid-humerus on the left side and some pain radiating down into the left small finger. This was likely due to vertebral involvement at the corresponding level, specifically around the C7-C8 region. On physical examination, he was alert, hemodynamically stable, and had an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of one, indicating that the patient was restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory. There was evidence of weight loss, but he was not emaciated. He has an average height of 172 cm, and he weighed 71 kg. His body mass index (BMI) was 24.0. Head and neck exams were unremarkable with no evidence of Horner syndrome or palpable lymphadenopathy. His neck vertebrae were not particularly tender, but point tenderness was identified around T2 to T3 between the scapulae. Chest and heart exams were unremarkable. The abdominal exam revealed no lymph nodes, masses, free fluid, or visceromegaly. The central nervous system (CNS) was normal with no focal or lateralizing signs. Fingers had no evidence of clubbing or nicotine staining.
The patient provided computed tomography (CT) and biopsy results of the lung mass obtained from the Middle East. This included a CT of his head, which was unremarkable, and a CT of his abdomen and pelvis, which revealed a primary lung mass and widespread metastatic disease to the contralateral lung and bones. Histopathology confirmed a NSCLC, invasive adenocarcinoma, grade 2 (G2), with a predominant acinar pattern. Immunochemistry (IHC) revealed positive TTF1 (Thyroid transcription factor 1) and CK7 (cytokeratin7), with negative CK20. Tumor staging was denoted as cT3N2M1b, stage IVA based on clinical and radiographic findings.
As the patient was symptomatic, while waiting for the NGS testing and PD-L1 status results, he started systemic chemotherapy in September 2024 after prechemotherapy blood investigations, which were satisfactory (Table 2). He received two cycles of combination chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) five and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV), supported with vitamin B12 (1000 mcg intramuscular), folic acid (0.4 mg orally once daily), and pre-chemotherapy dexamethasone (4 mg orally BID for three days starting day before chemotherapy) along with IV zoledronate (4 mg intravenous monthly).
Subsequently, the results of the molecular investigations from Saudi Arabia were received in October 2024, which revealed negative PD-L1 status. NGS identified a PIK3CA E542K missense mutation (VAF [variant allele frequency] 39%) and two uncommon EGFR frameshift deletions (E701fs and L702fs; VAFs of 32.8% and 21.5%, respectively). The reported EGFR VAFs represents the proportion of sequencing reads harboring each EGFR frameshift deletion, reflecting the relative abundance of each mutation within the tumor sample rather than implying two separate tumor allele. Moreover, ALK, NTRK, MET, BRAF, ROS1, and TP53 were negative.
A multidisciplinary tumor board reviewed the case with new investigations. Given the patient’s stage IV NSCLC harboring a rare, uncommon EGFR mutation, the patient was enrolled in the OCELOT clinical trial on 6 November 2024, after obtaining informed written consent, and was switched to osimertinib 80 mg once daily, a 1L targeted therapy. OCELOT is a multicenter Canadian phase II clinical trial of osimertinib in 1L in patients with uncommon EGFR mutation (cohort B), in 3L (third-line) rechallenge of patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC following 1L treatment with Osimertinib, and 2L (second-line) treatment with platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy (cohort A) [26]. The trial is supported by a grant from AstraZeneca. The patient continued with zoledronate (4 mg IV monthly) for his bony metastases. Further CT imaging of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis was performed on 4 November 2024, before initiating osimertinib as part of the clinical trial, which redemonstrated a left upper lobe mass (4.6 × 2.9 cm) and multiple lymph nodes, as well as bony disease, without intracranial involvement. The overall scans as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) revealed that he did not respond well to the systemic chemotherapy and his symptoms also persisted. The patient then started to take osimertinib 80 mg daily as per the clinical trial protocol, with excellent tolerance and a significant improvement in the patient’s overall disease symptoms. He has been active and independent with normal Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). He reported good appetite, no mucositis, no nausea or vomiting, and no diarrhea. He denied any new aches or pains. He has a minor dry cough, which is unchanged from his baseline. He denied progressive shortness of breath. His follow-up chest X-ray, taken recently, showed decreased left perihilar and mid-lung opacity, with no other significant changes (Figure 4). His blood tumor markers, specifically CEA and CA125, showed notable improvement (Figure 5), with the most recent CT scan indicating partial response as per the RECIST criteria with residual left lung opacity measuring 2.2 cm (Figure 2).

3. Discussion

In this report, we identified a patient with stage IV NSCLC harbouring uncommon EGFR frameshift deletions, E701fs and L702fs, who had a partial response to osimertinib and is currently participating in the OCELOT clinical trial. Although TKIs are effective in typical/common EGFR mutations, there is varied literature on their efficacy in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, raising therapeutic uncertainty. Frameshift mutations specifically are extremely rare, but exon 19 frameshifts have been hypothesized to be responsive to TKI therapy, which suggest that the exon 18 frameshift mutation seen in our patient may respond similarly [27]. This case contributes to the sparse literature, specifically showcasing the effectiveness of osimertinib in these rare EGFR mutations.
As previously noted, in stage IV NSCLC, testing for AGA using methods such as NGS, IHC, or PCR (polymerase chain reaction) help guide therapy. Patients with an EGFR mutation commonly receive an EGFR TKI, which improves survival outcomes in this cohort. Current literature mainly focuses on patients with typical EGFR mutations, which represent around 85% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. These mutations are highly sensitive to EGFR TKIs. The most clinical benefit has been observed in patients with common (Ex19del and exon 21 codon p.Leu858Arg [L858R] point mutation) EGFR mutations, where osimertinib in the 1L setting has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 80% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and a median overall survival (OS) of 18.9 months (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37–0.57; p < 0.001) and 38.6 months (HR, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64–1.00; p = 0.046), respectively, as per the FLAURA trial [23,24]. The FLAURA2 trial, which evaluated the addition of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy over osimertinib alone, showed further progression-free survival gains (median PFS, 25.5 months vs. 16.7 months; HR for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 = 0.79; p < 0.001) [25]. The ORR was 83% (95% CI, 78–87%) in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and 76% (95% CI, 70–80%) in the osimertinib-alone group [25]. The final OS data presented in World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) in September 2025, reported a median OS of 47.5 months with combination therapy compared to 37.6 months with monotherapy (p = 0.02) [28]. However, similar to FLAURA, the FLAURA2 trial only enrolled patients with typical EGFR mutations.
Evidence for treatment in uncommon EGFR mutations mainly comes from retrospective, post hoc or pooled meta-analyses. A post hoc analysis from 2014 examined the effectiveness of gefitinib (a first-generation TKI) in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (G719X or L861Q). This study found that survival time tended to be shorter among patients receiving gefitinib for such uncommon EGFR mutations compared to those receiving carboplatin-paclitaxel (11.9 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.102) [29]. However, pooled post hoc LUX-Lung data showed the effectiveness of afatinib (a second-generation TKI) in patients with the G719X, L861Q, and S768I mutations. This study reported an overall survival of 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.4–26.9), objective response of 71.1% (95% CI, 54.1–84.6), and progression-free survival of 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.6–14.7) [30,31,32,33]. For the PACC subgroup of uncommon EGFR mutations, data reported an increased sensitivity with afatinib, with an ORR of approximately 56%, but with increased toxicity [22,31,34]. Hence, there is heterogeneity in the responsiveness of uncommon mutations to earlier-generation TKIs.
A multicenter, phase II trial in Korea reported the first evidence of osimertinib efficacy in metastatic or recurrent NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations [35]. This trial excluded typical NSCLC mutations, T790M-resistant mutations, and exon 20 insertions. Of the uncommon mutations, excluding exon 20 insertions, the study mainly included G719X, L861Q, and S768I mutations. This trial included 36 patients in the efficacy analyses and reported a median PFS of 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.8–9.2) and a median OS of 27.0 months (95% CI, 18.5–35.5) [35]. However, this study is limited by its small population size and the inclusion of both first-line treatment and additional lines of therapy. The UNICORN phase II non-randomized clinical trial also looked at the effectiveness of osimertinib in 40 patients with metastatic NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations, mainly G719X, S768I, and L861Q. This study excluded exon 20 insertions but included patients with common mutations if they had a coexisting uncommon EGFR mutation. This group of patients (n = 18) was assigned to the compound mutations arm, which also included patients with more than one uncommon EGFR mutation. The remaining (n = 22) had solitary mutations. They found osimertinib to be effective and reported a median PFS of 9.4 months (95% CI, 2.7–15.2). ORR was 45.5% (90% CI, 26.9–65.3) and 66.7% (90% CI, 43.7–83.7) in the solitary and compound groups, respectively [36]. Lastly, there was a phase II trial which ended early due to insufficient patient accrual. This study only included stage IV NSCLC patients with G719X, S768I, and L861Q mutations and had 17 patients enrolled. However, observational data found an ORR of 47% (95% CI, 23–72) and median PFS of 10.5 months [37]. The ongoing pan-Canadian OCELOT study of osimertinib for patients with treatment-naive advanced NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations also revealed valuable insights. Overall, the interim analysis of the study reported an ORR of 45% (95% CI, 33–58) with a disease control rate (DCR) of 77% (95% CI, 66–86) [26]. Of the 62 evaluable patients, 17 had L861X (classical-like type; ORR 8/17 = 47%), 31 had PACC (pure PACC or PACC compound mutations with other uncommon EGFR) mutations (ORR 12/31 = 38.7%), and 14 had neither (ORR 4/14 = 28.6%) [26]. There is no updated data on the uncommon co-occurring EGFR frameshift deletion mutation, which this gentleman has. Therefore, he is being treated with osimertinib as per the OCELOT trial, with an excellent clinical and improved radiological response.
Other TKIs have also been investigated in uncommon EGFR mutations. Cohort C of the CHRYSALIS-2 trial looked at the effectiveness of amivantamab plus lazertinib and included 105 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (mainly G719X, L861Q, and S768I), excluding exon 20 insertions and common EGFR mutations. Amivantamab is a bispecific antibody targeting EGFR Exon 20 insertions and MET mutations, while Lazertinib is a third-generation EGFR TKI shown to have increased effectiveness against T790M-resistance mutations [38,39,40]. Of the 49 patients that were treatment naïve, the ORR was 55% (95% CI, 40–69) with a median PFS of 19.5 months (95% CI, 11.0-NE [not estimable]) [41]. Likewise, the use of lazertinib alone was also studied among 36 patients with uncommon mutations, excluding exon 20 insertions, common EGFR mutations, and the T790M-resistance mutation. The ORR was found to be 50.0% (95% CI, 34.5–65.6), and median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 4.4–19.2) [42]. Specific to the PACC EGFR mutations, cohort 2 of the randomized global dose escalation FURTHER (FURMO-002) study looked at firmonertinib, a TKI approved in China for 1L advanced NSCLC for common EGFR mutations. The trial reported meaningful overall response rate in 1L setting with further investigations are still ongoing [43,44]. Anlotinib is another TKI with broad anti-tumor activity. Emerging evidence supports its use in advanced NSCLC, particularly in combination treatment approaches and in subsequent line settings following progression on platinum-based chemotherapy [45,46]. Moreover, combination of anlotinib with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) appears to enhance intracranial disease control in patients with brain metastasis [47]. In our case, NGS also identified a concurrent PIK3CA mutation. Although acquired PIK3CA mutations have been suggested to contribute to resistance to TKI therapy, available evidence indicates that the presence of this concurrent mutation does not significantly impact the clinical benefit of TKI monotherapy. Further evaluation of similar cases is warranted to better clarify its impact on treatment response [48,49].
Overall, osimertinib-based therapy, either as monotherapy or, preferably, with concurrent chemotherapy, remains the first-line treatment for patients with typical EGFR mutations. Of the rare and uncommon EGFR mutations (e.g., G719X, L861Q, and S768), including PACC-like and uncommon compound PACC-like mutations, afatinib has shown improved efficacy. However, known unpleasant side effects and limited CNS penetration make this drug less attractive. Patients with an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation may receive amivantamab (an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody) in combination with chemotherapy [50]. All other uncommon mutations are treated similarly to AGA-negative mutations and would receive platinum-doublet chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and pemetrexed, unless enrolled in a clinical trial. Our patient’s uncommon EGFR mutation falls outside the classical targets; however, due to his enrollment in the OCELOT trial, he was eligible for osimertinib and showed excellent overall improvement. Upon progression, further options for this gentleman would include palliative chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy, or new agents that target specific resistance mechanisms, as well as possible enrollment in other clinical trials.

4. Conclusions

The present case contributes to the rarest subset of uncommon EGFR mutations (E701fs and L702fs), which have shown a favourable response to osimertinib. Existing literature suggests frameshift deletion mutations to produce structural changes that may favour responsiveness to TKIs. Thus, further studies are needed to fully understand the sensitivity of these uncommon EGFR mutations to TKIs. Clinical trial enrolment remains critical for such patients.

Author Contributions

A.K.Q.W., S.R.K. and D.K.H.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Project administration. D.B. and M.D.V.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received support from the AstraZeneca grant that funded the OCELOT clinical trial.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, as it is an individual case report.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received funding from AstraZeneca. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NSCLCNon-small cell lung cancer
NGSNext-generation sequencing
ctDNACirculating tumor DNA
AGAActionable genomic alterations
PD-L1Programmed death-ligand 1
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
ASCOAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology
NCCNNational Comprehensive Cancer Network
CCOCancer Care Ontario
ECOGEastern Cooperative Oncology Group
TKITyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
MDACCMD Anderson Cancer Center System
PACCP-loop and αC-helix compressing
PFSProgression-free survival
OSOverall survival
ORRObjective response rate
CIConfidence interval
HRHazard ratio
DCRDisease control rate

References

  1. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brenner, D.R.; Gillis, J.; Demers, A.A.; Ellison, L.F.; Billette, J.-M.; Zhang, S.X.; Liu, J.L.; Woods, R.R.; Finley, C.; Fitzgerald, N.; et al. Projected Estimates of Cancer in Canada in 2024. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2024, 196, E615–E623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hendriks, L.E.L.; Remon, J.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Garassino, M.C.; Heymach, J.V.; Kerr, K.M.; Tan, D.S.W.; Veronesi, G.; Reck, M. Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2024, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Seung, S.J.; Hurry, M.; Walton, R.N.; Evans, W.K. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Survival in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Canada. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, e361–e367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ellison, L.F.; Saint-Jacques, N. Five-Year Cancer Survival by Stage at Diagnosis in Canada. Health Rep. 2023, 34, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barta, J.A.; Powell, C.A.; Wisnivesky, J.P. Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Ann. Glob. Health 2019, 85, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodak, O.; Peris-Díaz, M.D.; Olbromski, M.; Podhorska-Okołów, M.; Dzięgiel, P. Current Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Histological Classification, Targeted Therapies, and Immunotherapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. LoPiccolo, J.; Gusev, A.; Christiani, D.C.; Jänne, P.A. Lung Cancer in Patients Who Have Never Smoked—an Emerging Disease. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 21, 121–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elkrief, A.; Joubert, P.; Florescu, M.; Tehfe, M.; Blais, N.; Routy, B. Therapeutic Landscape of Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Canada in 2020. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laguna, J.C.; García-Pardo, M.; Alessi, J.; Barrios, C.; Singh, N.; Al-Shamsi, H.O.; Loong, H.; Ferriol, M.; Recondo, G.; Mezquita, L. Geographic Differences in Lung Cancer: Focus on Carcinogens, Genetic Predisposition, and Molecular Epidemiology. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2024, 16, 17588359241231260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muthusamy, B.; Raskina, K.; Lofgren, K.T.; Li, G.; Tolba, K.; Schwed, K.; Castellanos, E.; Huang, R.S.P.; Oxnard, G.R.; Schrock, A.B.; et al. Quantifying the Value of Multigene Testing in Resected Early Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2023, 18, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alexander, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Cheng, H. Update 2020: Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Lung 2020, 198, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bazhenova, L.; Ismaila, N.; Abu Rous, F.; Alluri, K.; Freeman-Daily, J.; Halmos, B.; Malhotra, N.; Marrone, K.A.; Puri, S.; Qin, A.; et al. Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2024.2. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, e72–e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hanna, N.H.; Robinson, A.G.; Temin, S.; Baker, S.; Brahmer, J.R.; Ellis, P.M.; Gaspar, L.E.; Haddad, R.Y.; Hesketh, P.J.; Jain, D.; et al. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1040–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Owen, D.H.; Jaiyesimi, I.A.; Leighl, N.B.; Ismaila, N.; Florez, N.; Puri, S.; Schenk, E.L.; Schneider, B.J.; Patel, J.D. Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline Clinical Insights. JCO Oncol. Pr. 2024, 20, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Riely, G.J.; Wood, D.E.; Ettinger, D.S.; Aisner, D.L.; Akerley, W.; Bauman, J.R.; Bharat, A.; Bruno, D.S.; Chang, J.Y.; Chirieac, L.R.; et al. Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2024, 22, 249–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yuan, M.; Huang, L.-L.; Chen, J.-H.; Wu, J.; Xu, Q. The Emerging Treatment Landscape of Targeted Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2019, 4, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Majeed, U.; Manochakian, R.; Zhao, Y.; Lou, Y. Targeted Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Advances and Future Trends. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Russano, M.; Perrone, G.; Fazio, G.R.D.; Galletti, A.; Citarella, F.; Santo, V.; Brunetti, L.; Vendittelli, A.; Vincenzi, B.; Tonini, G.; et al. Uncommon EGFR Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Precis. Cancer Med. 2022, 5, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harrison, P.T.; Vyse, S.; Huang, P.H. Rare Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 61, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Robichaux, J.P.; Le, X.; Vijayan, R.S.K.; Hicks, J.K.; Heeke, S.; Elamin, Y.Y.; Lin, H.Y.; Udagawa, H.; Skoulidis, F.; Tran, H.; et al. Structure-Based Classification Predicts Drug Response in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC. Nature 2021, 597, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Soria, J.-C.; Ohe, Y.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Reungwetwattana, T.; Chewaskulyong, B.; Lee, K.H.; Dechaphunkul, A.; Imamura, F.; Nogami, N.; Kurata, T.; et al. Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ramalingam, S.S.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Planchard, D.; Cho, B.C.; Gray, J.E.; Ohe, Y.; Zhou, C.; Reungwetwattana, T.; Cheng, Y.; Chewaskulyong, B.; et al. Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Planchard, D.; Jänne, P.A.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, J.C.-H.; Yanagitani, N.; Kim, S.-W.; Sugawara, S.; Yu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Geater, S.L.; et al. Osimertinib with or without Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389, 1935–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Breadner, D.A.; Liu, G.; Rothenstein, J.; Verma, S.; Menjak, I.; Cheema, P.K.; Juergens, R.; Mithoowani, H.; Bains, P.; Wang, Y.; et al. 1327P First-Line Osimertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutated Lung Cancer with Uncommon Mutations (OCELOT Study—Interim Analysis). Ann. Oncol. 2023, 34, S766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Improta, G.; Zupa, A.; Natalicchio, M.I.; Sisinni, L.; Marinaccio, A.; Bozza, G.; Vita, G.; Aieta, M.; Landriscina, M. Uncommon Frame-Shift Exon 19 EGFR Mutations Are Sensitive to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Med. Oncol. 2018, 35, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ecancer WCLC 2025: FLAURA2 Trial Shows Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy Improves Overall Survival in eGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC—Ecancer. Available online: http://ecancer.org/en/news/26998-wclc-2025-flaura2-trial-shows-osimertinib-plus-chemotherapy-improves-overall-survival-in-egfr-mutated-advanced-nsclc (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  29. Watanabe, S.; Minegishi, Y.; Yoshizawa, H.; Maemondo, M.; Inoue, A.; Sugawara, S.; Isobe, H.; Harada, M.; Ishii, Y.; Gemma, A.; et al. Effectiveness of Gefitinib against Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with the Uncommon EGFR Mutations G719X and L861Q. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cheunkarndee, T.; Guo, M.Z.; Houseknecht, S.; Feliciano, J.L.; Hann, C.L.; Lam, V.K.; Levy, B.P.; Murray, J.C.; Brahmer, J.R.; Forde, P.M.; et al. First-Line Osimertinib for Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Exon 19 Mutations and EGFR Compound Mutations. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2024, 5, 100686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, J.C.-H.; Schuler, M.; Popat, S.; Miura, S.; Heeke, S.; Park, K.; Märten, A.; Kim, E.S. Afatinib for the Treatment of NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Database of 693 Cases. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, J.C.-H.; Sequist, L.V.; Geater, S.L.; Tsai, C.-M.; Mok, T.S.K.; Schuler, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Yu, C.-J.; Ou, S.-H.I.; Zhou, C.; et al. Clinical Activity of Afatinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harbouring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Combined Post-Hoc Analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.-L.; Zhou, C.; Hu, C.-P.; Feng, J.; Lu, S.; Huang, Y.; Li, W.; Hou, M.; Shi, J.H.; Lee, K.Y.; et al. Afatinib versus Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Asian Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harbouring EGFR Mutations (LUX-Lung 6): An Open-Label, Randomised Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Borgeaud, M.; Parikh, K.; Banna, G.L.; Kim, F.; Olivier, T.; Le, X.; Addeo, A. Unveiling the Landscape of Uncommon EGFR Mutations in NSCLC-A Systematic Review. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2024, 19, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cho, J.H.; Lim, S.H.; An, H.J.; Kim, K.H.; Park, K.U.; Kang, E.J.; Choi, Y.H.; Ahn, M.S.; Sun, J.-M.; Lee, S.-H.; et al. MA13.04 Final Overall Survival Analysis of Osimertinib for Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations (KCSG-LU15-09). J. Thorac. Oncol. 2023, 18, S145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Okuma, Y.; Kubota, K.; Shimokawa, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Kawashima, Y.; Sakamoto, T.; Wakui, H.; Murakami, S.; Okishio, K.; Hayashihara, K.; et al. First-Line Osimertinib for Previously Untreated Patients With NSCLC and Uncommon EGFR Mutations: The UNICORN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024, 10, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Villaruz, L.C.; Wang, X.; Bertino, E.M.; Gu, L.; Antonia, S.J.; Burns, T.F.; Clarke, J.; Crawford, J.; Evans, T.L.; Friedland, D.M.; et al. A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Osimertinib in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 18 G719X, Exon 20 S768I, or Exon 21 L861Q Mutations. ESMO Open 2023, 8, 101183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Brazel, D.; Nagasaka, M. MARIPOSA: Can Amivantamab and Lazertinib Replace Osimertinib in the Front-Line Setting? Lung Cancer 2024, 15, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Park, K.; Haura, E.B.; Leighl, N.B.; Mitchell, P.; Shu, C.A.; Girard, N.; Viteri, S.; Han, J.-Y.; Kim, S.-W.; Lee, C.K.; et al. Amivantamab in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion–Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progressing on Platinum Chemotherapy: Initial Results From the CHRYSALIS Phase I Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 3391–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahn, M.-J.; Han, J.-Y.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, D.-W.; Lee, Y.-G.; Cho, E.K.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, G.-W.; Lee, J.-S.; et al. Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from the Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Parts of a First-in-Human, Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 1-2 Study. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1681–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cho, B.C.; Wang, Y.; Felip, E.; Cui, J.; Spira, A.I.; Neal, J.W.; Baik, C.; Marmarelis, M.E.; Ichihara, E.; Lee, J.-S.; et al. Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Atypical EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results from CHRYSALIS-2. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 8516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Park, S.; Ahn, H.K.; Lee, S.; Min, Y.J.; Kim, J.; Jung, H.A.; Sun, J.-M.; Lee, S.-H.; Ahn, J.S.; Ahn, M.-J.; et al. Lazertinib for Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Phase II Multicenter Trial. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2025, 20, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Le, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Planchard, D.; Cheng, Y.; Li, X.; Gadgeel, S.; Zhang, J.; Spira, A.; Hayashi, H.; et al. PL04.07 FURTHER: A Global, Randomized Study of Firmonertinib at Two Dose Levels in TKI-Naive, Advanced NSCLC with EGFR PACC Mutations. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2024, 19, S5–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ecancer WCLC 2024: Results from the FURTHER Trial Demonstrate Firmonertinib Is a Promising Potential Therapy for Patients with NSCLC with EGFR PACC Mutations—Ecancer. Available online: http://ecancer.org/en/news/25278-wclc-2024-results-from-the-further-trial-demonstrate-firmonertinib-is-a-promising-potential-therapy-for-patients-with-nsclc-with-egfr-pacc-mutations (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  45. Hetta, H.F.; Aljohani, H.M.; Sirag, N.; Elfadil, H.; Salama, A.; Al-Twalhy, R.; Alanazi, D.; Al-johani, M.D.; Albalawi, J.H.; Al-Otaibi, R.M.; et al. Synergizing Success: The Role of Anlotinib Combinations in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hetta, H.F.; Alqifari, S.F.; Alshehri, K.; Alhowiti, A.; Alharbi, S.S.; Mirghani, H.; Alrasheed, T.; Mostafa, M.E.A.; Sheikh, M.; Elodemi, M.; et al. Efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Docetaxel in Advanced NSCLC Previously Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hetta, H.F.; Ali, M.A.S.; Alqifari, S.F.; Salem, H.A.; Qasem, K.A.; Alanazi, F.E.; Alhowiti, A.; Alatawi, A.M.; Mirghani, H.; Alrasheed, T.; et al. Is Anlotinib and Radiotherapy Combination Effective for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases? A Systematic Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eng, J.; Woo, K.M.; Sima, C.S.; Plodkowski, A.; Hellmann, M.D.; Chaft, J.; Kris, M.G.; Arcila, M.E.; Ladanyi, M.; Drilon, A. Impact of Concurrent PIK3CA Mutations on Response to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers and on Prognosis in Oncogene-Driven Lung Adenocarcinomas. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, X.; Mei, W.; Zhang, P.; Zeng, C. PIK3CA Mutation as an Acquired Resistance Driver to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Challenges and Opportunities. Pharmacol. Res. 2024, 202, 107123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, C.; Tang, K.-J.; Cho, B.C.; Liu, B.; Paz-Ares, L.; Cheng, S.; Kitazono, S.; Thiagarajan, M.; Goldman, J.W.; Sabari, J.K.; et al. Amivantamab plus Chemotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389, 2039–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Curroncol 33 00055 g001
Figure 1. EGFR signaling pathway and our patient’s representative mutations in the EGFR TKI domain: In normal cells, the EGFR signalling pathway is activated by the binding of a ligand that causes dimerization of EGFR. This leads to downstream activation of several pathways like P13K/AKT, MAPK/RAF, and JAK/STAT. In EGFR-mutated lung cancer, activating mutations in exons 18–21 cause the EGFR kinase domain to be constitutively active. This leads to cell survival and resistance to apoptosis. MDACC: MD Anderson Cancer Center, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PACC: P-loop αC-helix compressing, Ex19del: exon 19 deletion, EX20ins: exon 20 insertion, fs: frameshift, ins: insertion. Arrows and perpendicular lines indicate activation/induction and inhibition/suppression, respectively.
Figure 1. EGFR signaling pathway and our patient’s representative mutations in the EGFR TKI domain: In normal cells, the EGFR signalling pathway is activated by the binding of a ligand that causes dimerization of EGFR. This leads to downstream activation of several pathways like P13K/AKT, MAPK/RAF, and JAK/STAT. In EGFR-mutated lung cancer, activating mutations in exons 18–21 cause the EGFR kinase domain to be constitutively active. This leads to cell survival and resistance to apoptosis. MDACC: MD Anderson Cancer Center, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PACC: P-loop αC-helix compressing, Ex19del: exon 19 deletion, EX20ins: exon 20 insertion, fs: frameshift, ins: insertion. Arrows and perpendicular lines indicate activation/induction and inhibition/suppression, respectively.
Curroncol 33 00055 g001
Curroncol 33 00055 g002
Figure 2. CT scan of the chest: Pre-treatment CT scan (15 August 2024) at baseline showing dominant left upper lobe/infrahilar mass [red arrow] with innumerable millimetric metastatic nodules bilaterally (A); most recent CT scan (5 September 2025) showing the residual focal opacity in the left upper lobe [red arrow] has decreased in size with some of the cavitary nodules being smaller, showing overall partial treatment response with osimertinib (B).
Figure 2. CT scan of the chest: Pre-treatment CT scan (15 August 2024) at baseline showing dominant left upper lobe/infrahilar mass [red arrow] with innumerable millimetric metastatic nodules bilaterally (A); most recent CT scan (5 September 2025) showing the residual focal opacity in the left upper lobe [red arrow] has decreased in size with some of the cavitary nodules being smaller, showing overall partial treatment response with osimertinib (B).
Curroncol 33 00055 g002
Curroncol 33 00055 g003
Figure 3. Timeline of case presentation. The timeline of this case presentation is detailed in chronological order, along with follow-up intermittent scans. ED: Emergency department, CC: Cancer Center, NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer, LUL: Left Upper Lobe, LLL: Left Lower Lobe, CTPA: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography, CT: Computer tomography, CXR: Chest X-ray, TAP: Thorax/Abdomen/Pelvis, IHC: Immunohistochemistry, NGS: Next-generation sequencing, AUC: area under the curve, IV: intravenous, IM: intramuscular, PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1, TTF1: Thyroid transcription factor 1, CK7: Cytokeratin7, mo: months, F/U: Follow-up, ADL: Activities of Daily Living, IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.
Figure 3. Timeline of case presentation. The timeline of this case presentation is detailed in chronological order, along with follow-up intermittent scans. ED: Emergency department, CC: Cancer Center, NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer, LUL: Left Upper Lobe, LLL: Left Lower Lobe, CTPA: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography, CT: Computer tomography, CXR: Chest X-ray, TAP: Thorax/Abdomen/Pelvis, IHC: Immunohistochemistry, NGS: Next-generation sequencing, AUC: area under the curve, IV: intravenous, IM: intramuscular, PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1, TTF1: Thyroid transcription factor 1, CK7: Cytokeratin7, mo: months, F/U: Follow-up, ADL: Activities of Daily Living, IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.
Curroncol 33 00055 g003
Curroncol 33 00055 g004
Figure 4. Chest X-ray (15 August 2024) at base line compared to the most recent: left upper lobe mass opacity with diffuse interstitial thickening (A); follow-up imaging (5 September 2025) revealed left lung opacity showing treatment response [red arrow left] and there is redemonstration and improvement in diffuse interstitial thickening [red arrow right] (B).
Figure 4. Chest X-ray (15 August 2024) at base line compared to the most recent: left upper lobe mass opacity with diffuse interstitial thickening (A); follow-up imaging (5 September 2025) revealed left lung opacity showing treatment response [red arrow left] and there is redemonstration and improvement in diffuse interstitial thickening [red arrow right] (B).
Curroncol 33 00055 g004
Curroncol 33 00055 g005
Figure 5. Timeline of Tumor Markers CEA, CA 125: Blood tumor markers CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) and CA 125 showed notable improvement after osimertinib administration.
Figure 5. Timeline of Tumor Markers CEA, CA 125: Blood tumor markers CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) and CA 125 showed notable improvement after osimertinib administration.
Curroncol 33 00055 g005
Table 1. Structured-based classification of EGFR mutations by the MD Anderson system [22].
Table 1. Structured-based classification of EGFR mutations by the MD Anderson system [22].
Classical-LikeT790M-LikeExon 20 Loop InsertionPACC
L858RTS90M-3SEx20ins-NLPrimary
Exon19delsClassical/T790MS768dupSVDG719X
S720PG719X/T790MA767dupASVS768I
L861Q/RL747_K745del insATSPED770insNPGL747P/S
S811FS768I/T790MD770del ins-GYV769L
K754ET790M-3REx20ins-FLE709_T710 delinsD
T725MEx19del/T790M/L792HH773insNPHAcquired
L833F/VL858R/T790M/L718XH773dupHC797S
A763insFQEAClassical/T790M/C797SV774insAVL792H
A763insLQEA V774insPRG724S
L718X
T854I
Exon20ins-NL: Exon20 near loop insertion, Exon20ins-FL: Exon20 far loop insertion, PACC: P-loop αC-helix compressing, T790M-3S: T790M-3 sensitive, T790M-3R: T790M-3 resistant.
Table 2. Key laboratory investigations trend at baseline, before starting osimertinib and on subsequent follow-up.
Table 2. Key laboratory investigations trend at baseline, before starting osimertinib and on subsequent follow-up.
Key Laboratory
Parameters		At Baseline
15 August 2024		Before Starting
Osimertinib
6 November 2024		Recent Follow-Up
5 September 2025
LKC (×109/L)
(NR: 4.0–10.0)		11.77.28.1
ERC (×1012/L)
(NR: 4.50–6.50)		4.744.454.67
Hemoglobin (g/L)
(NR: 135–170)		135139126
Thrombocytes (×109/L)
(NR: 150–400)		276345203
Neutrophil (×109/L)
(NR: 2.0–7.5)		8.23.84.7
Lymphocyte (×109/L)
(NR: 1.0–4.0)		2.32.22.4
Monocyte (×109/L)
(NR: 0.2–0.8)		0.71.00.7
Serum CA 19–9 (U/mL)
(NR: ≤34)		171918
Serum CEA (ug/L)
(NR: ≤5.0)		8.19.23.1
Serum CA 125 (U/mL)
(NR: ≤35)		233013
ALT (U/L)
(NR: <51)		756
AST (U/L)
(NR: <51)		121312
ALP (U/L)
(NR: 40–129)		26317577
Serum LD (U/L)
(NR: ≤225)		144181196
Sodium (mmol/L)
(NR: 135–145)		136137135
Potassium (mmol/L)
(NR: 3.50–5.00)		4.44.74.6
Albumin (g/L)
(NR: 35–52)		343240
Calcium (mmol/L)
(NR: 1.06–1/29)		2.052.082.19
Creatinine (umol/L)
(NR: ≤130) 		7999109
LKC: Leukocyte, ERC: Erythrocyte, CEA: Carcinoembryonic Antigen, ALT: Alanine Transaminase, AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase, LD: Lactate Dehydrogenase, NR: Normal range (reference value).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wong, A.K.Q.; Khan, S.R.; Hadi, D.K.; Breadner, D.; Vincent, M.D. Targeting the Uncommon: A Case Report of Osimertinib Response in Advanced NSCLC Patient with Dual EGFR (E701fs and L702fs) Frameshift Deletions. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010055

AMA Style

Wong AKQ, Khan SR, Hadi DK, Breadner D, Vincent MD. Targeting the Uncommon: A Case Report of Osimertinib Response in Advanced NSCLC Patient with Dual EGFR (E701fs and L702fs) Frameshift Deletions. Current Oncology. 2026; 33(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wong, Angel Kwan Qi, Saqib Raza Khan, Danial Khan Hadi, Daniel Breadner, and Mark David Vincent. 2026. "Targeting the Uncommon: A Case Report of Osimertinib Response in Advanced NSCLC Patient with Dual EGFR (E701fs and L702fs) Frameshift Deletions" Current Oncology 33, no. 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010055

APA Style

Wong, A. K. Q., Khan, S. R., Hadi, D. K., Breadner, D., & Vincent, M. D. (2026). Targeting the Uncommon: A Case Report of Osimertinib Response in Advanced NSCLC Patient with Dual EGFR (E701fs and L702fs) Frameshift Deletions. Current Oncology, 33(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop