Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Western Romania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Oncology Nurses’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices in Providing Sexuality Care to Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

by
Omar Alqaisi
1,*,
Maha Subih
1,
Kurian Joseph
2,
Edward Yu
3 and
Patricia Tai
4,5
1
Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
2
Cross Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
3
Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
4
Department of Oncology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
5
UpToDate, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060337
Submission received: 18 May 2025 / Revised: 1 June 2025 / Accepted: 4 June 2025 / Published: 7 June 2025

Abstract

:
Sexual health in cancer care is often overlooked. This study examines oncology nurses’ knowledge and practices regarding sexuality care, identifying barriers and facilitators. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided search of Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and EBSCO focused on studies from 2014 to 2024. Of 1735 identified studies, only 11 met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed a lack of knowledge among nurses and dissatisfaction with sexual healthcare. Barriers include time constraints, cultural factors, and personal reservations. Routine discussions are often absent due to inadequate training. Education- and system-based strategies are needed to enhance nurses’ competence in addressing sexual concerns. Implementing training programs, structured records, evaluation tools, concept maps, and system support would improve patient care and oncology nursing practices. Addressing these gaps with practical measures can enhance communication, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. This unique analysis was conducted by two experienced advanced nurses in the Middle East, where discussions about sex are often regarded as taboo.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. In 2022, an estimated 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million deaths occurred. Based on currently available data from internet searches at the time of writing this manuscript in May 2025, cancer accounts for approximately one in six deaths worldwide [1,2]. The leading types of cancer worldwide were lung, colorectal, liver, and stomach cancers in 2023 [2,3]. Among men, the most common types of cancer are lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer. In women, the most prevalent cancers are breast, colorectal, lung, cervical, and thyroid cancer [4,5].
Sexual health is a fundamental aspect of overall well-being, influencing quality of life across physical, psychological, and social dimensions [6]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) (2009), sexual health is an integral component of well-being [7]. Cancer can disrupt daily activities, particularly sexual functioning, as the disease and its treatments may lead to loss of sexual desire, poor body image, and impaired sexual performance [8]. Cancer and its treatment have been linked to sexual dysfunction [9]. Male partners may experience erectile dysfunction, while females may face vaginal dryness and pain during sexual activity [10,11].
Both patients and their partners may be uncertain or hesitant about addressing sexual concerns, as cultural taboos often discourage discussions about sexuality in the context of illness [12]. Despite advancements in cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy, patients undergoing these treatments may experience irreversible sexual dysfunction [13,14]. Therefore, open discussions with healthcare providers about sexual care are essential [8]. Additionally, providing social support plays a crucial role in helping patients cope [15].
Sexual health information can help reduce anxiety related to sexual concerns, enhance sexual satisfaction, and improve patients’ overall quality of life [16]. Akhu-Zaheya et al. found that education on sexual health may help lower anxiety levels in patients [13]. Schwarz et al. noted that sexual health in cancer care is rarely prioritized, primarily due to language barriers, healthcare workers’ lack of knowledge on sexual health issues [17], and cultural and traditional factors that influence nurses’ perceptions of sexual care [14].
Understanding nurses’ attitudes toward sexual health, along with providing adequate training, is crucial for improving cancer treatment [18]. Cancer patients have sexual health needs, and unaddressed sexual dysfunction significantly reduces satisfaction, regardless of age, sex, or cancer type [19].
This scoping review explores existing literature on nurses’ attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding sexual care for cancer patients. It identifies key factors influencing care delivery, including barriers and facilitators in different countries. By mapping current evidence, this review provides insights into how healthcare providers can better support the sexual health of cancer patients, ultimately enhancing care quality and patient outcomes. We aim to improve sexual care for cancer patients globally, including in cultures where discussing sex is considered taboo.

2. Materials and Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across four major electronic databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and the Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) database, including Medline and CINAHL, focusing on peer-reviewed studies indexed in Web of Science and Scopus [20]. EBSCO is provided by the university for free, without any conflict of interest.
The search utilized a combination of keywords, including ‘nurses’, ‘attitudes’, ‘knowledge’, ‘cancer patients’ or ‘oncology patients’, and ‘sexual health’ or ‘sexual care’. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used as a checklist to simultaneously appraise and/or describe studies [21]. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to analyze past publications [22].

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The review included studies that met the following criteria: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research on nurses providing care to male or female cancer patients across various healthcare settings, published in English between 2014 and 2024. Data extraction followed a standardized form, capturing information on authorship (year of publication), study design, and results (knowledge, attitudes, practices, barriers, and facilitators). The data were extracted and evaluated by the first two coauthors (O.A., M.S.), while all coauthors critiqued the results for clinical relevance.

3. Results

The database search identified 1735 studies across the selected platforms. These were reviewed, duplicates were removed, and exclusions were made based on the study inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were assessed, resulting in the selection of studies eligible for full-text review to determine their final inclusion. The search process is outlined in the following flow diagram (Figure 1). The qualifying studies were analyzed to examine nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in delivering sexual care to cancer patients. A total of 11 papers were included in the final review, comprising quantitative and qualitative survey studies, quasi-experimental interventions and concept mapping studies.

Summary of Key Findings from Selected Studies

A significant finding across almost all studies is the widespread lack of knowledge among nurses regarding sexual care [17,23]. While nurses generally recognize the importance of addressing sexual health in cancer care, various barriers commonly hinder them from doing so:
  • Discomfort in discussing sexual health is a major challenge. Among Belgian oncology nurses, 85% reported feeling embarrassed when discussing sexual dysfunction with patients [24]. Similarly, in the study by Depke and Onitilo, 70% of nurses expressed the same concern [25].
  • Lack of time: In one study, 70% of Turkish nurses cited time constraints as a limiting factor when discussing sexual health [26]. Likewise, 60% of nurses participating in the Fex-Talk study reported similar challenges [27].
  • Alignment with cultural sensitivities: Chow et al. in 2021 used concept mapping to highlight the need for culturally appropriate care for the Chinese population, emphasizing that any developed model should align with the local clinical practice environment [28]. A three-phase concept mapping approach was adopted. Phase I involved individual interviews, Phase II generated a concept map, and Phase III evaluated its clinical applicability [28]. A total of 80 participants, including patients with gynecological cancers, their spouses/partners, nurses, and physicians, were recruited from two hospitals in Hong Kong. In Phase I, 50 statements were identified. Phase II used statistical techniques to create a concept map with seven clusters, including treatment impact, organizational support and information-giving. Phase III informed the development of an adapted practice model, based on the extended Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, Intensive Therapy (PLISSIT) model, which the concept map helped to shape [29]. Participants found this model appropriate for guiding sexuality care delivery [28]. Consistent with the above, Oskay et al. found that 60% of nurses in Turkey felt bound by cultural ethical values that prohibited discussions about sexual topics [26].
Practice tips evolving from our current study identify several facilitators that could help nurses provide better sexuality care:
  • Educational interventions: For instance, Winterling et al. found that 75% of nurses reported increased confidence following the intervention [27]. According to findings by Eid et al. and Winterling et al., structured training, practice, and workshops—particularly those incorporating focused role-playing—enhanced nurses’ self-perceived preparedness for discussing sexual health [27,30].
  • Structured tools and guidelines: Jung and Kim’s study highlighted a frequently overlooked issue: the importance of utilizing sexual healthcare (SHC) records for cancer patients to enhance nursing practice related to sexuality concerns [31].
  • A nursing chronicle focused on SHC for cancer patients may help facilitate and improve oncology nurses’ efficiency in delivering this type of care to their patients [32]. The authors emphasized the need for guidelines to standardize psychosexual care.
  • Supportive environments: The importance of the healthcare environment and team-based approaches was also highlighted. Paulsen et al. and Williams et al. affirmed nurses’ perspectives, stating that favorable systems and strong nurse–patient relationships encouraged greater disclosure [32,33]. Extracted summary is shown in Table 1.

4. Discussion

This review aimed to explore the existing literature on nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding sexual care for cancer patients. Three studies highlighted a significant knowledge gap among nurses (Table 1). Although they recognize the importance of sexual healthcare, factors such as limited understanding, embarrassment, time constraints and cultural barriers hinder effective communication in this area.
Despite widespread discomfort and lack of awareness, nurses acknowledge the significance of sexual health in cancer care. However, many report feeling embarrassed when discussing sexual health concerns with patients [25]. Attitudes are significantly influenced by cultural factors. For instance, Turkish nurses often perceive cultural conventions as barriers to discussing sexual matters [26]. Despite being aware of the importance of sexual health, nurses often refrain from actively engaging in discussions due to time constraints, lack of protocols, and inadequate skills. Educational methods, such as structured training and role-playing, can enhance their readiness and confidence [27]. Structured tools and criteria improve communication and attitudes [31]. Additionally, a supportive environment fosters honest and open conversations [32,33].
Table 1 supports several previous studies in the existing literature by addressing knowledge gaps, providing culturally appropriate solutions, and establishing a framework for enhancing sexual healthcare in cancer nursing practice worldwide [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The relevant references are discussed below. A published work from our university illustrates the cultural taboo surrounding discussions of male sexual impotence [35]. This review significantly contributes to the field.
Kotronoulas et al. concluded that nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in sexual and reproductive healthcare were inadequate [36]. Consistent with recent findings from Winterling et al. in 2020 and Paulsen et al. in 2023, interviewed nurses identified their educational deficits and insufficient training as key obstacles to addressing sexual health with cancer patients [27,33]. This highlights a persistent need for enhanced education and structured interventions to improve nurses’ communication skills in this area. Lack of education not only affects nurses’ knowledge but also impacts their confidence in addressing these issues. Despite efforts to advance nursing practices that aim to reduce sexual health inequalities, many nurses feel underprepared due to insufficient training.
Cultural factors also influence nurses’ attitudes toward sexual care. For instance, in studies conducted by Zeng et al., Chinese nurses reported that cultural norms posed significant challenges and served as reminders for oncology patients regarding sexual health [37,38]. Oskay et al. also highlighted that Turkish nurses faced cultural barriers in addressing sexual concerns. Both individual and societal factors prevented them from providing adequate support, despite the importance of sexual healthcare [26]. Discomfort in discussing sexual topics is often culturally rooted, particularly in conservative societies where sexual health remains a taboo subject. Cultural norms shape both nurse and patient perceptions, making it difficult to integrate sexual care into routine oncology practice. There are clear links between embarrassment, societal pressure, and the tendency of many Turkish nurses to avoid addressing sexually related matters [39]. Similarly, the current review identified cultural sensitivity as a significant barrier.
According to Kim et al. and Arikan et al., improving nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexual care requires targeted interventions, such as training programs and the development of sexual healthcare scales to assess nurses’ readiness [40,41]. These observations are consistent with Jung and Kim in 2016, who suggested that the use of several specific aspects of a formal sexual healthcare nursing note would enhance nurses’ attitudes [31]. Structured interventions help create an organized pattern for addressing sexual health concerns, thus helping nurses navigate these discussions without experiencing the embarrassment often reported [31]. Interventional programs provide a structured approach, enabling nurses to address sexual health more systematically, thus reducing personal discomfort and facilitating better patient care.
There are different research techniques, one of which is the mixed method research (MMR) [42]. Table 1 summarizes different practical methods in the literature to enhance sexual care of patients. Methods for sexual counseling based on PLISSIT (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestion, Intensive Therapy) and BETTER (Bring up, Explain, Tell, Time, Education, Record) should be in the nursing curriculum [43]. Different tools are available nowadays including scales for measurement [44]. Since cancer patients experience various post-treatment complications, research aimed at improving all aspects of quality of life—especially sexual health—is urgently needed.
Similar to nursing education, the core medical school curriculum does not adequately prepare students to discuss sexual health issues in their future careers [45,46]. These responsibilities often fall to coronary care nurses, especially when caring for patients recovering from a heart attack [47]. Sexual health is a crucial aspect of patients’ quality of life. In the minds of family doctors, they may feel incompetent to address all aspects of health for women of reproductive age [48]. Therefore, this study has broad implications for nursing, medical, and other health professional training programs, as well as ongoing continuing education after graduation. Obviously, breast, gynecologic, prostate, penile, testicular cancer patients would benefit from this study [49,50]. Other cancer types may also lead to post-treatment sexual morbidity. This study could serve as an important resource not only for cancer professionals but also for those involved in pre-exposure prophylaxis for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) transmission [51], sex education of teenagers and university students [52], and health surveys [53] aiming at improving communication and counseling.
Future research employing creative techniques may be beneficial, such as group sessions, phone conversations [54], artificial intelligence chatbots (especially useful when human resources are limited) [55], and protected online communities [56]. Research should also focus on specific subgroups of patients, such as sexual minorities [57,58], as well as individuals with special health conditions, including cardiac diseases, neurological disorders [59], or cystic fibrosis [60], etc. Their sexual health is often overlooked.
There are limitations to the present review. First, a large proportion of the reviewed studies relied on self-reported data, which carries a risk of bias. Nurses may have overestimated or underestimated their comfort level in handling sexual health-related duties. Additionally, potential language bias may exist, as only English-language articles were included. Furthermore, the diversity of healthcare systems represented across studies may affect generalizability.
In summary, this concise review, supported by valuable references, highlights a clinically significant issue that has received limited attention in publications. Notably, this work has been prepared by experienced and highly educated advanced nurses and researchers, whose backgrounds in ancient cultures have been shaped by religious beliefs that historically rendered discussions about sex with patients a taboo topic [35]. We are confident that both medical, nursing, and other healthcare professionals will benefit from adopting these suggestions. This work will serve as a valuable resource for all healthcare providers and educators.

5. Conclusions

This scoping review highlights the need for education, systematic reinforcement, and cultural competence to enhance oncology nurses’ ability to address the sexual health concerns of cancer patients. Despite perceived barriers, research has demonstrated that educational sex-related awareness sessions and structured interventions help ensure effective communication.
Further research should be encouraged to quantify these interventions over the long term and assess strategies for integrating sexual medicine into broader oncology practice across diverse cultural and healthcare settings. If these challenges are managed effectively, healthcare providers will be better positioned to deliver quality care that acknowledges the sexual health needs of cancer patients, thereby enhancing their quality of life.
Implications for practice are as follows: (1) To improve oncology nurses’ knowledge of sexual care for cancer patients, this review suggests integrating comprehensive sexual health education into established nursing and medical school curricula and continuing education programs, with an emphasis on multicultural competence. (2) Ongoing feedback and research on the long-term effects of these interventions are also crucial in modern healthcare practice to evaluate their benefits in various clinical settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, O.A. and M.S.; resources, writing—original draft preparation, O.A., M.S. and P.T.; writing—review and editing, all authors; critiqued the manuscript drafts, including K.J. and E.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

We have provided details regarding where data supporting reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study.

Acknowledgments

The other members of International Oncology Cooperative Research Group (IOCRG), particularly Kelvin Wong, for checking the manuscript and arranging zoom discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

P.T. is the clinical advisor of UpToDate. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BETTERBring up, Explain, Tell, Time, Education, Record
EBSCOElton B. Stephens Company
MMATMixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)
MMRMixed methods research
PLISSITPermission Limited Information Specific Suggestions Intensive Therapy
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
SHCSexual Healthcare
WHOWorld Health organization

References

  1. Lin, L.; Li, Z.; Yan, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, H. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence and death for 29 cancer groups in 2019 and trends analysis of the global cancer burden, 1990–2019. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Global Cancer Burden Growing, Amidst Mounting Need for Services. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/01-02-2024-global-cancer-burden-growing--amidst-mounting-need-for-services (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  3. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. World Health Organization; 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  5. Latest Global Cancer Data: Cancer Burden Rises to 19.3 Million New Cases and 10.0 Million Cancer Deaths in 2020. Available online: https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/latest-global-cancer-data-cancer-burden-rises-to-19-3-million-new-cases-and-10-0-million-cancer-deaths-in-2020/ (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  6. Verschuren, J.E.A.; Enzlin, P.; Dijkstra, P.U.; Geertzen, J.H.B.; Dekker, R. Chronic Disease and Sexuality: A Generic Conceptual Framework. J. Sex Res. 2010, 47, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mütsch, J.; Friedrich, M.; Leuteritz, K.; Sender, A.; Geue, K.; Hilbert, A.; Stöbel-Richter, Y. Sexuality and cancer in adolescents and young adults—A comparison between reproductive cancer patients and patients with non-reproductive cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hughes, M.K. Sexuality and the Cancer Survivor. Cancer Nurs. 2000, 23, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sexuality & Cancer. Available online: https://www.mdanderson.org/patients-family/diagnosis-treatment/emotional-physical-effects/sexuality-cancer.html (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  10. Matzo, M.; Hijjazi, K. If you don’t ask me…don’t expect me to tell: A pilot study of the sexual health of hospice patients. J. Hosp. Palliat. Nurs. 2009, 11, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Vocht, H.; Hordern, A.; Notter, J.; van de Wiel, H. Stepped skills: A team approach towards communication about sexuality and intimacy in cancer and palliative care. Australas. Med. J. 2011, 4, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Traumer, L.; Jacobsen, M.H.; Laursen, B.S. Patients’ experiences of sexuality as a taboo subject in the Danish healthcare system: Qualitative interview study. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2018, 33, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akhu-Zaheya, L.M.; Masadeh, A.B. Sexual information needs of Arab-Muslim patients with cardiac problems. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2015, 14, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Al-Ghabeesh, S.H.; Al-Momani, M.; Bashayreh, I.; Alshraifeen, A.; Saifan, A. Nurses’ perspective towards caring for Jordanian men with sexual health problems. J. Men’s Health 2019, 15, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  15. Al-Ghabeesh, S.H. How does coping strategies, social support, and mindfulness improve the psychological well-being of Jordanian burn survivors? A descriptive correlational study. Burns 2021, 48, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Byrne, M.; Murphy, P.; D’Eath, M.; Doherty, S.; Jaarsma, T. Association between sexual problems and relationship satisfaction among people with cardiovascular disease. J. Sex. Med. 2017, 14, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schwarz, E.R.; Kapur, V.; Bionat, S.; Rastogi, S.; Gupta, R.; Rosanio, S. The prevalence and clinical relevance of sexual dysfunction in women and men with chronic heart failure. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2007, 20, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fashafsheh, I.; Al-Ghabeesh, S.H.; Ayed, A.; Salama, B.; Batran, A.; Bawadi, H. Health-promoting behaviors among nursing students: Palestinian perspective. Inquiry 2021, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Acquati, C.; Zebrack, B.J.; Faul, A.C.; Embry, L.; Aguilar, C.; Block, R.; Hayes-Lattin, B.; Freyer, D.R.; Cole, S. Sexual functioning among young adult cancer patients: A 2-year longitudinal study. Cancer 2017, 124, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. EBSCO Research Databases. Available online: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  21. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 User Guide|Resource Details|National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Available online: https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/232 (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  22. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Assessing Sexual Knowledge and Sexual Attitudes of Nursing Students: Implications for Primary Health Care. Available online: https://spaj.ukm.my/ijphr/index.php/ijphr/article/view/255 (accessed on 5 June 2024).
  24. Mbalè, E.; D’Hondt, L.; Vastrade, C.; Coppieters, Y. Perceptions et attitudes des infirmier(e)s en matière de vie affective et sexuelle des patients cancéreux. Bull Cancer 2020, 107, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Depke, J.L.; Onitilo, A.A. Sexual health assessment and counseling: Oncology nurses’ perceptions, practices, and perceived barriers. J. Community Support. Oncol. 2015, 13, 442–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oskay, U.; Can, G.; Basgol, S. Discussing sexuality with cancer patients: Oncology nurses attitudes and views. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 7321–7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Winterling, J.; Lampic, C.; Wettergren, L. Fex-talk: A short educational intervention intended to enhance nurses’ readiness to discuss fertility and sexuality with cancer patients. J. Cancer Educ. 2019, 35, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chow, K.M.; Chan, C.W.H.; Choi, K.C.; White, I.D.; Siu, K.Y.; Sin, W.H. A practice model of sexuality nursing care: A concept mapping approach. Support. Care Cancer 2021, 29, 1663–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Annon, J. The PLISSIT Model: A proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. J. Sex Educ. Ther. 1976, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eid, K.; Christensen, S.; Hoff, J.; Drake, D.; Yadav, K.; Burtson, P.; Kuriakose, M.; Patton, H.; Nyamathi, A. Sexual Health Education: Knowledge Level of Oncology Nurses and Barriers to Discussing Concerns With Patients. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2020, 24, e50–e56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jung, D.; Kim, J.H. Effects of a sexual health care nursing record on the attitudes and practice of oncology nurses. Sex. Reprod. Heal. 2016, 9, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Williams, N.F.; Hauck, Y.L.; Bosco, A.M. Nurses’ perceptions of providing psychosexual care for women experiencing gynaecological cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2017, 30, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Paulsen, A.; Vistad, I.; Fegran, L. Nurse–patient sexual health communication in gynaecological cancer follow-up: A qualitative study from nurses’ perspectives. J. Adv. Nurs. 2023, 79, 4648–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mansour, S.E.; Mohamed, H.E. Handling sexuality concerns in women with gynecological cancer: Egyptian nurse’s knowledge and attitudes. J. Educ. Pract. 2015, 6, 146–159. [Google Scholar]
  35. Alnaeem, M.M.; Shehadeh, A.; Nashwan, A.J. The experience of patients with hematological malignancy in their terminal stage: A phenomenological study from Jordan’s perspective. BMC Palliat. Care 2024, 23, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Kotronoulas, G.; Papadopoulou, C.; Patiraki, E. Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of sexual health care in patients with cancer: Critical review of the evidence. Support. Care Cancer 2009, 17, 479–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zeng, Y.C.; Li, Q.; Wang, N.; Ching, S.S.Y.; Loke, A.Y. Chinese nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexuality care in cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2011, 34, e14–e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeng, Y.C.; Liu, X.; Loke, A.Y. Addressing sexuality issues of women with gynaecological cancer: Chinese nurses’ attitudes and practice. J. Adv. Nurs. 2011, 68, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Algier, L.; Kav, S. Nurses’ approach to sexuality-related issues in patients receiving cancer treatments. Turk. J. Cancer 2008, 38, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, S.; Kang, H.S.; Kim, J.H. A sexual health care attitude scale for nurses: Development and psychometric evaluation. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2011, 48, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arikan, F.; Meydanlioglu, A.; Ozcan, K.; Ozer, Z.C. Attitudes and beliefs of nurses regarding discussion of sexual concerns of patients during hospitalization. Sex. Disabil. 2014, 33, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, L.; Ivankova, N.V. Using mixed-methods in evidence-based nursing: A scoping review guided by a socio-ecological perspective. J. Res. Nurs. 2022, 27, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Shalamzari, K.H.; Asgharipour, N.; Jamali, J.; Kermani, A.T.; Babazadeh, R. Comparing the effect of sexual counseling based on BETTER and PLISSIT models on sexual assertiveness in women with breast cancer after mastectomy. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2024, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. Demirhan Kayacik, A.; Hamlaci Başkaya, Y.; İlçioğlu, K. Effect of sexual counseling training in gynecological cancers according to the PLISSIT model on midwifery students’ awareness and attitude: A randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Community Based Nurs. Midwifery 2024, 12, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Milazzo, M.; Parwatkar, K.; Perelmuter, S.; Blackman, C.; Tomaszewski, A.; Williams, A.; Rubin, R.S.; Lufler, R.S. What are future doctors learning about sex? An assessment of sexual health curricula across medical schools in the Northeastern United States. J. Sex. Med. 2024, 21, 1131–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Horning, P.; Scimeca, A.; Jenkins, L.C. The lack of sexual health education in medical training leaves students and residents feeling unprepared. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1998–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ivarsson, B.; Fridlund, B.; Sjöberg, T. Health professionals’ views on sexual information following MI. Br. J. Nurs. 2010, 19, 1052–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Conway, T.; Hu, T.C.; Mason, E.; Mueller, C. Are primary care residents adequately prepared to care for women of reproductive age? Fam. Plan. Perspect. 1995, 27, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kennedy, S.K.F.; Mekhaeil, S.; Zhang, E.; Jolfaei, N.A.; Wong, H.C.Y.; Chan, A.W.; Lee, S.F.; Haywood, D.; Kirk, D.; Abdou, A.M.; et al. Sexual health after breast cancer: A clinical practice review. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2024, 13, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Roumieux, C.; Vandermaesen, K.; Dancet, E.; Albersen, M. Penile cancer treatment and sexuality: A narrative review. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2025; epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, C.; Chang, W.; Liu, Y. Understanding the PrEP care continuum for adults: Health care providers’ perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and missed opportunities. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2025, 39, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sekine, M.; Aune, D.; Nojiri, S.; Watanabe, M.; Nakanishi, Y.; Sakurai, S.; Iwashimizu, T.; Sakano, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Nishizaki, Y. Cross-sectional study on public health knowledge among first-year university students in Japan: Implications for educators and educational institutions. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0291414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  53. Teshale, G.; Jejaw, M.; Demissie, K.A.; Baykemagn, N.D.; Yehuala, T.Z.; Kelkay, J.M. Healthcare-seeking behavior for sexually transmitted infections among women who initiated sexual intercourse at an early age in 22 Sub-Saharan African Countries: A multilevel analysis of 2018–2024 demographic and health survey data. BMC Infect. Dis. 2025, 25, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  54. Kim, H.S.; Yun, C. Effects of a sexual health enhancement program for women with breast cancer: A quasi-experimental study. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2025, 76, 102852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hanai, A.; Ishikawa, T.; Kawauchi, S.; Iida, Y.; Kawakami, E. Generative artificial intelligence and non-pharmacological bias: An experimental study on cancer patient sexual health communications. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024, 31, e100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  56. Ryu, H.; Pratt, W. Reducing the stigma of sexual and reproductive health care through supportive and protected online communities. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2025, 2024, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  57. Patel, R.K.; Rosa, W.E.; Chen, E.; Chitapanarux, I.; Pramesh, C.S.; Dee, E.C. Enhancing global cancer care for sexual and gender minority populations: Regional perspectives and global implications. Lancet Glob. Health 2025, 23, S2214-109X(25)00144-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Azzellino, G.; Aitella, E.; Ginaldi, L.; De Martinis, M. Barriers and nursing strategies in oncology care for LGBTQIA+ people: A scoping review. Cancers 2025, 17, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  59. Lefebvre, S.; Cousin, L.; Bourmaleau, J.; Rohé, S.; Devictor, J.; Martin, P.; Jovic, L. Nursing practices on sexual health for people with neurological disorders: A narrative review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2025, 34, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kazmerski, T.M.; Moy, C.; Aliaj, E.; Hudson, J.; Wright, B.; Poranski, M.; Sjoberg, J.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Georgiopoulos, A.M.; Ladores, S.L.; et al. Prioritizing sexual and reproductive health research and care for people with cystic fibrosis: A 2023 workshop report from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender (SHARING) Research Working Group. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2024, 23, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow diagram.
Figure 1. Flow diagram.
Curroncol 32 00337 g001
Table 1. Studies included in this review.
Table 1. Studies included in this review.
ReferencesStudy DesignSampleMain FindingsBarriers/Facilitators [as Identified by % of Respondents]
2020, Winterling J [27]Quantitative/descriptive cross-
sectional
Oncology nurses (N = 60) in
Sweden
Short educational intervention increased readiness to discuss fertility and sexuality (75%); improved communication confidence scores by 30%.Barriers: time constraints (60%); lack of training (40%). Facilitators: 85% found the short, structured program beneficial.
2023, Paulsen A [33]Qualitative Nurses in gynecologic cancer follow-up (N = 15) clinics in
Kristiansand, Norway
Expressed discomfort (70%);
unprepared to initiate sexual health conversations (80%); regularly addressed sexual health (only 20%).
Barriers: discomfort (70%); lack of training (80%); perceived patient reluctance (60%). Facilitators: familiarity with patients (40%).
2015, Depke JL [25] Descriptive cross- sectional Oncology nurses (N = 45) in
Weston, Wisconsin, United States
Recognized the importance of sexual health (80%); actively assessing patients (22%); embarrassment (70%); assumed patient disinterest (60%).Barriers: embarrassment (70%); assumed patient disinterest (60%).
Facilitators: 50% believed training could improve discussions.
2014, Oskay Ü [26]Descriptive cross- sectionalOncology nurses in Turkey (N = 112)Believed sexuality is important in care (65%); initiated patient discussions (15%); time limitations (70%); cultural barriers (60%).Barriers: time constraints (70%); cultural sensitivities (60%). Facilitators: more training on culturally sensitive care (55%).
2016, Jung D [31]Quasi- experimentalOncology nurses (N = 38) in Korea Structured records improved attitudes (80%) and increased comfort in discussing sexual health (75%).Barriers: initial reluctance to adopt new records (30%). Facilitators: structured documentation helpful (80%).
2015, Mansour SE [34]Mixed-
methods
approach
Oncology nurses in Egypt (N = 72)Poor knowledge scores (mean: 7.3 ± 2.5 among all nurses); discomfort in discussing sexual health was strongly correlated with lack of knowledge (p < 0.05).Barriers: limited resources, staff shortages and patient embarrassment. Facilitators: nurse–patient relationship, private setting, communication skills.
2021, Chow KM [28]Concept mappingNurses, patients, and spouses (N = 80) in China Developed a practice model based on 7 clusters, including attitude toward sexual care and timing of delivery. Concept map adapted from PLISSIT model.Barriers: lack of organizational support and structured protocols. Facilitators: organizational support, structured care model.
2020, Mbalè E [24]Qualitative Oncology nurses in Belgium (N = 20)Sexual dysfunction is under-valued: not discussing sexual health due to embarrassment (85%), lack of evaluation tools (65%).Barriers: embarrassment (85%), lack of tools (65%). Facilitators: increased awareness and knowledge.
2020, Eid K [30]Pre- and post-interventionOncology nurses (N = 65) in
United states
Knowledge scores improved significantly post-workshop;
barriers to discussing sexuality
reduced by 25% at 3 months and sustained at 6 months.
Barriers: lack of knowledge. Facilitators: workshop improved knowledge, role-playing activities.
2017, Williams NF [32]Qualitative Nurses in Australia (N = 17)Five themes emerged, including the influence of personal and professional experience on psychosexual care. Lacked system support (60%).Barriers: lack of system support (60%), personal discomfort. Facilitators: guidelines, teamwork, experience-based confidence.
PLISSIT: Permission Limited Information Specific Suggestions Intensive Therapy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alqaisi, O.; Subih, M.; Joseph, K.; Yu, E.; Tai, P. Oncology Nurses’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices in Providing Sexuality Care to Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060337

AMA Style

Alqaisi O, Subih M, Joseph K, Yu E, Tai P. Oncology Nurses’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices in Providing Sexuality Care to Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Current Oncology. 2025; 32(6):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alqaisi, Omar, Maha Subih, Kurian Joseph, Edward Yu, and Patricia Tai. 2025. "Oncology Nurses’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices in Providing Sexuality Care to Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review" Current Oncology 32, no. 6: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060337

APA Style

Alqaisi, O., Subih, M., Joseph, K., Yu, E., & Tai, P. (2025). Oncology Nurses’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices in Providing Sexuality Care to Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Current Oncology, 32(6), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060337

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop