Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variants in the Mitochondrial Thymidylate Biosynthesis Pathway Increase Colorectal Cancer Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Decitabine/Cedazuridine in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia in Canada
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 30
Issue 9
10.3390/curroncol30090582
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Managing the Risk of Lung Toxicity with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd): A Canadian Perspective

by
Jan-Willem Henning
1,*,
Christine Brezden-Masley
2,
Karen Gelmon
3,
Stephen Chia
3,
Shane Shapera
4,
Micheal McInnis
5,
Daniel Rayson
6 and
Jamil Asselah
7
1
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331-29th Street, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
2
Mount Sinai Hospital, 1284-600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
3
BC Cancer Agency, 600 10th Avenue West, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
4
University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 9N-971, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
5
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
6
Department of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, QEII-Bethune Building, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
7
Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(9), 8019-8038; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090582
Submission received: 5 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ongoing advances in precision cancer therapy have increased the number of molecularly targeted and immuno-oncology agents for a variety of cancers, many of which have been associated with a risk of pulmonary complications, among the most concerning being drug-induced interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (DI-ILD). As the number of patients undergoing treatment with novel anticancer agents continues to grow, DI-ILD is expected to become an increasingly significant clinical challenge. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody–drug conjugate targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 that is gaining widespread use in the metastatic breast cancer setting and is undergoing exploration for other oncologic indications. ILD/pneumonitis is an adverse event of special interest associated with T-DXd, which has potentially fatal consequences if left untreated and allowed to progress. When identified in the asymptomatic stage (grade 1), T-DXd-related ILD can be monitored and treated effectively with the possibility of treatment continuation. Delayed diagnosis and/or treatment, however, results in progression to grade 2 or higher toxicity and necessitates immediate and permanent discontinuation of this active agent. Strategies are, therefore, needed to optimize careful monitoring during treatment to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes. Several guidance documents have been developed regarding strategies for the early identification and management of T-DXd-related ILD, although none have been within the context of the Canadian health care environment. A Canadian multidisciplinary steering committee was, therefore, convened to evaluate existing recommendations and adapt them for application in Canada. A multidisciplinary approach involving collaboration among medical oncologists, radiologists, respirologists, and allied health care professionals is needed to ensure the proactive identification and management of T-DXd-related ILD and DI-ILD associated with other agents with a similar toxicity profile.

1. Introduction

A number of systemic agents used for the treatment of cancer have been associated with pulmonary toxicities, one of the most concerning of which is drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis (DI-ILD). Many novel therapies, including molecularly targeted agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been associated with a risk of DI-ILD. As the number of anticancer agents continues to grow, DI-ILD is expected to become an increasingly significant clinical challenge across all types of cancers. The recent approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel ADC targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (Figure 1), for various lines of therapy and indications in breast cancer has highlighted this issue and is the focus of this review.
ILD has been identified as an adverse event of special interest with T-DXd and occurs in approximately 10% to 14% of breast cancer patients treated with the drug [1,2,3,4]. If not effectively identified and treated, T-DXd-related ILD can be fatal. While asymptomatic (grade 1) DI-ILD caused by most drugs does not require specific therapy, T-DXd-related ILD is unique because of the high risk of evolution to serious illness (grades 3–4 ILD) and because early identification of grade 1 ILD may allow for ongoing treatment, whereas progression to grade 2 or higher ILD necessitates permanent discontinuation of T-DXd.
Curroncol 30 00582 g001
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). T-DXd is composed of an anti-HER2 antibody, a linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The anti-HER2 antibody binds to HER2 on tumor cells, which leads to ADC internalization. The linker, which is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are upregulated in cancer cells, is then cleaved and releases the topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The topoisomerase I inhibitor enters the nucleus of the cell, resulting in cell death. Upon cell death, the membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor is released from the cell and can then enter neighboring cells regardless of whether they express HER2. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan. Reproduced with permission from Swain et al. [5]. Reprinted from Cancer Treatment Reviews, Vol. 106, Swain S.M., et al., Multidisciplinary clinical guidance on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis-Focus on proactive monitoring, diagnosis, and management, 102378, Copyright (2022), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). T-DXd is composed of an anti-HER2 antibody, a linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The anti-HER2 antibody binds to HER2 on tumor cells, which leads to ADC internalization. The linker, which is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are upregulated in cancer cells, is then cleaved and releases the topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The topoisomerase I inhibitor enters the nucleus of the cell, resulting in cell death. Upon cell death, the membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor is released from the cell and can then enter neighboring cells regardless of whether they express HER2. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan. Reproduced with permission from Swain et al. [5]. Reprinted from Cancer Treatment Reviews, Vol. 106, Swain S.M., et al., Multidisciplinary clinical guidance on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis-Focus on proactive monitoring, diagnosis, and management, 102378, Copyright (2022), with permission from Elsevier.
Curroncol 30 00582 g001
Several guidance documents have been developed in the United States and Europe outlining strategies for the early identification and management of T-DXd-related ILD [5,6]. This multidisciplinary steering panel was convened to evaluate existing recommendations in the context of the Canadian health care system with the goal of developing a pragmatic strategy to optimize the therapeutic benefit of T-DXd for Canadian patients.

2. Indications for T-DXd in Canada

T-DXd is approved in Canada for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer as a third-line therapy after disease progression following taxanes, trastuzumab + pertuzumab, and trastuzumab-emtansine, as well as for early disease recurrence in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, and for second-line therapy in patients previously treated with taxanes and trastuzumab + pertuzumab [1,2,7]. In 2023, T-DXd was also approved for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer who have received at least two prior lines of endocrine therapy in addition to one line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or following disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. HER2-low is defined as a score of 1+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or an IHC score of 2+ with no HER2 amplification on in situ hybridization [4].
Approvals for these indications were based on significant improvements in all relevant efficacy endpoints compared to standard of care therapy observed in the DESTINY-Breast01 [1,8], DESTINY-Breast02 [2], DESTINY-Breast03 [3], and DESTINY-Breast04 [4] trials (Table 1).
In addition to the indications for metastatic breast cancer, T-DXd is approved in the United States for locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer, based on the positive results of the DESTINY-Gastric01 and DESTINY-Gastric02 trials [9,10]; for metastatic HER2-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 trials [11,12,13]; and is under investigation for various additional tumor types, including colorectal and other cancers [14,15].

3. Known Risk Factors for DI-ILD

The term “ILD/pneumonitis” is broadly used to describe a diverse group of inflammatory lung disorders affecting alveolar structures, pulmonary interstitium, and small airways and is characterized by the presence of inflammation or scarring of lung parenchyma [16]. Identifiable causes include exposure to organic materials, drugs, or toxins that trigger hypersensitivity pneumonitis; exposure to inorganic dusts and other compounds causing pneumoconiosis; autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma; uncommon or rare genetic abnormalities (mutations in telomerase enzymes, mucin genes, surfactant proteins, etc.); and exposure to certain drugs [16].
A number of drug classes have been implicated in DI-ILD, including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), antiarrhythmics, antimicrobials, and antineoplastic agents [17,18].
Key risk factors that predict for an increased risk of developing DI-ILD include a history of pre-existing lung disease and reduced lung function [18,19,20,21]; poor performance status [22]; smoking [18]; age older than 60 years [18,19,21]; Japanese or African American ethnicity [21,23]; and male sex [18,19]. Specifically related to oncology, prior treatment with multiple chemotherapy regimens or thoracic radiotherapy; history of radiation recall pneumonitis; presence of lung cancer, lung metastases, or other drug-induced pneumonitides; ongoing therapy with multiple molecularly targeted agents; and treatment with a combination of molecularly targeted and cytotoxic agents have all been identified as risk factors predisposing to DI-ILD [18,21,22]. Factors that increase the risk of poor outcomes and/or mortality from DI-ILD include acute symptomatic disease with rapid symptom onset, hypoxemia, need for mechanical ventilation (associated with a mortality rate > 60%), pre-existing ILD, male sex, age over 65 years, and a diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer [24,25,26,27,28,29]. However, it is important to note that many people who develop DI-ILD have no identifiable pre-existing risk factors, which highlights the need for vigilance.
The identification and monitoring of patients at risk of DI-ILD are crucial for timely intervention; however, there are currently no effective strategies for identifying and monitoring DI-ILD in clinical practice beyond CT imaging and monitoring of oxygen saturation. Prospective clinical trials are on the horizon to determine if there are any helpful screening tools. The authors of this paper encourage Canadian clinicians to collect real-world data on the incidence of T-DXd-related ILD and other potential adverse events.

4. DI-ILD with Specific Anticancer Treatments

DI-ILD has been recognized as an important toxicity associated with a number of chemotherapeutic and targeted antineoplastic therapies (Table 2). Bleomycin is the historical example, with a reported incidence of up to 45% and up to a 3% mortality rate [5,30,31]. Contemporary examples include agents targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [32,33], tyrosine kinase/anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], anti-HER2 agents [42,43,44,45,46], BRAF inhibitors [47], cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors [48,49,50], and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors [51], as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors [52,53,54,55,56,57] and ADCs [5], with case-fatality rates ranging from 0% to 51.3% depending on the drug [18]. DI-ILD has been reported, to a lesser extent, with other widely used conventional chemotherapeutic agents, such as taxanes and gemcitabine, with an incidence of DI-ILD of up to 5% [58,59], and rare but serious events can arise with oxaliplatin [60].
The pathogenesis of DI-ILD is poorly understood, but several mechanisms—both cytotoxic and immune related—may be involved, either alone or in combination, depending on the drug. Direct damage to pneumocytes or alveolar endothelial cells, cell-mediated lung injury, oxidative stress, and systemic cytokine release may all contribute to DI-ILD [61]. In patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, these mechanisms may be compounded by amplified auto-immune processes triggered by the therapy [57]. Further studies are needed to investigate further the cytotoxic and immune-related mechanisms involved in DI-ILD to provide a better understanding of the underlying processes involved and potentially aid in the development of preventive strategies.

5. T-DXd and the Risk of ILD

ILD was first identified as an adverse event of special interest in the DESTINY-Breast01 trial, where 13.6% of patients experienced independently adjudicated ILD and 2.2% died because of this complication [1]. Subsequently, guidelines for the identification and management of ILD were incorporated into the DESTINY clinical trial program with a focus on close monitoring and active management including corticosteroids, along with dose interruption/modification and mandatory discontinuation of T-DXd for grade 2 or higher ILD events.
In a pooled analysis of heavily treated patients across 9 phase 1 and 2 T-DXd clinical trials, the incidence of T-DXd-related ILD was 15.4%, with 11.9% experiencing grade 1 or 2 events and a 2.2% incidence of grade 5 events [62]. Rates of ILD ranged from 10.1% in DESTINY-Gastric02 [10] to 26.4% in DESTINY-Lung01 [11] (Table 3). Most events (87%) occurred during the first 12 months of treatment, with a median time to onset of 5.4 months (range < 0.1 to 46.8 months) overall and of 3.2 months for grade 5 events (range < 0.1 to 20.8 months) [62].
Potential risk factors for DI-ILD in the pooled analysis included baseline oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 95%, T-DXd dose > 6.4 mg/kg q3w, >4 years since initial disease diagnosis, renal dysfunction, age < 65 years, and baseline or prior lung comorbidities (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), prior ILD/pulmonary fibrosis, and radiation pneumonitis) [62]. Treatment in Japan was also identified as a risk factor for DI-ILD in the pooled analysis [62]; however, T-DXd was initially studied in Japan without the monitoring protocols implemented in later trials, which may account for the higher incidence in this population.
As with other anticancer agents, the underlying mechanisms of T-DXd-related DI-ILD are unclear, but the proposed pathogenesis includes target-dependent and/or -independent uptake and catabolism of the ADC or a bystander effect of the cytotoxic payload released from cells following ADC catabolism [63]. Lung epithelial cells express HER2 protein, and off-cancer target mechanisms have been suggested on the basis of animal studies which observed localization of T-DXd in alveolar macrophages rather than pulmonary epithelial cells [64]. The release of the chemotherapy payload and subsequent bystander effect resulting in cytotoxic lung injury is currently the leading hypothesis in the understanding of T-DXd-related ILD [5].

6. Diagnosis and Monitoring of T-DXd-Related ILD

Current published recommendations for the early identification and management of T-DXd-related ILD in other jurisdictions do not necessarily fully apply to the Canadian health care environment, with variable timely access to pulmonary function tests (PFTs), high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and subspecialty respirology expertise. The steering committee therefore sought to tailor existing recommendations and create a practical approach for the Canadian health care landscape (Figure 2).
Diagnosis of DI-ILD requires timely investigation and multidisciplinary collaboration among the oncologist, respirologist, radiologist, and other allied health care providers. In the case of reasonable causality between T-DXd and development of ILD/pneumonitis, prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention is key. Other diagnoses (e.g., bacterial, viral, and fungal infections; alveolar hemorrhage; metastases; heart failure; aspiration pneumonia; radiation-induced lung injury; and pulmonary embolism with infarction [65]) should be kept under consideration for atypical cases and nonresponding patients. Opportunistic infections such Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJP) should be strongly considered for patients on systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies.
While the risk of T-DXd-related ILD appears to plateau after 12 months [62], it can occur at any time, and long-term monitoring and vigilance are essential.

6.1. Key Investigations

6.1.1. Medical History

At baseline, a history and physical examination focusing on known T-DXd-related ILD risk factors should be conducted regardless of the patient’s age. If significant risk factors exist (i.e., baseline SpO2 < 95%, T-DXd dose > 6.4 mg/kg q3w, >4 years since initial disease diagnosis, renal dysfunction, age < 65 years, and baseline or prior lung comorbidities), patient discussion should include a risk–benefit ratio of treatment with T-DXd and consideration of alternative agents.

6.1.2. Monitoring for Symptoms

On-treatment clinical visits should focus on careful pulmonary symptom assessment in the context of a functional inquiry and physical examination to detect early signs and symptoms of T-DXd-related ILD. Patients should receive continuing education and regular reminders about the potential adverse events associated with T-DXd, including ILD. At each visit, patients should be asked about any potential symptoms of ILD and be advised of the risk and the need to immediately report symptoms [5]. Symptoms of DI-ILD are nonspecific and include cough (particularly dry cough), shortness of breath/exertional dyspnea, fever, and unexplained fatigue.

6.1.3. Pulmonary Function Testing (PFT)

Assessment of SpO2 with pulse oximetry should be conducted at baseline and at each pretreatment clinic visit or prior to treatment in the infusion center. An SpO2 of <95% or a drop of more than 4% from baseline during treatment is correlated with an increased risk of ILD and ILD severity [62] and should prompt a detailed respiratory assessment.
For patients with new pulmonary symptoms, PFT including spirometry for forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity, an exertional pulse oximetry walk test, or six-minute walk test [5] can identify abnormalities associated with pneumonitis and help to quantify the degree of physiological impairment. In particular, a low diffusion capacity (corrected for hemoglobin) can be a sensitive marker of parenchymal lung disease. Various guidelines recommend baseline and follow-up PFT testing for patients on T-DXd [1,5]; however, they may be difficult to interpret in a patient with significant pulmonary metastases, and there are currently no data to support a reduction in ILD incidence or early detection. In many centers in Canada, formal PFTs may take several weeks to arrange, and it is essential that decision making is not delayed while awaiting these investigations.
The steering committee recommends considering baseline PFTs only for patients with a history of lung comorbidities (asthma, COPD, prior ILD/pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary emphysema, and radiation pneumonitis) with repeat studies to aid in the adjudication of etiology in complex cases. Patients with asthma, COPD, or a history of previous ILD/pneumonitis should be evaluated by their respirologist (or referred for a new respirology consult if they are not already under the care of a respirologist) before starting treatment with T-DXd, if possible.

6.1.4. Chest Imaging

All patients undergoing treatment with T-DXd should undergo a baseline chest CT; the initial oncologic disease assessment CT is sufficient for this purpose. Because certain pre-existing lung conditions are risk factors for DI-ILD, imaging is critical to ensure safe consideration of T-DXd. Documentation of abnormal findings on pretreatment images, with particular attention to evidence of pre-existing ILD, is critical for the assessment of ILD on subsequent CT scans [30].
Patients with metastatic breast cancer on therapy generally undergo conventional CT scans every 9 to 12 weeks, and in many cases this will be sufficient for diagnosis of ILD. If ILD is suspected but not confidently diagnosed on conventional CT, HRCT should be promptly performed to confirm the diagnosis.
In contrast to a routine restaging CT, the HRCT protocol is performed without contrast and includes thinner slices (≤2 mm), as well as expiratory and prone imaging in cases of uncertainty with supine imaging revealing possible dependent atelectasis [66]. Volumetric image acquisition and both coronal and sagittal reconstructions can be helpful in determining the distribution of disease. All modern CT scanners are able to accommodate this protocol (available from the Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiologists: https://car.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/High-Resolution-CT-of-the-Chest-Recommended-Technique-2020.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2023) [66].
In the T-DXd clinical trials, disease and response assessments were conducted every 6 weeks with CT or MRI [67], an interval typically not feasible outside of a clinical trial. Further research is needed to determine the optimal imaging frequency for DI-ILD monitoring. The steering committee recommends CT chest imaging as per routine nontrial protocols, every 9 to 12 weeks, until further evidence becomes available regarding optimal imaging intervals while on T-DXd. HRCT may be used when the conventional CT is suspicious for ILD or when there is clinical suspicion outside of planned disease reassessment CT intervals.
In clinical practice, the CT requisition does not routinely state the specific therapy that a patient with breast cancer is receiving. With T-DXd, it is particularly important that the radiologist be alerted on the imaging requisition that the patient is potentially on a pneumotoxic drug and that the images be examined for both assessment of tumor response as well as for T-DXd-related ILD. The radiologist should be vigilant in identifying inflammatory pulmonary findings, as well as to adjudicate etiology, in the case of nonspecific findings of potential multifactorial origin. The results should be communicated as quickly as possible to ensure that prompt action can be taken.
Although the imaging presentation of DI-ILD is often nonspecific, there are four common patterns of DI-ILD on CT to consider—diffuse alveolar damage (DAD); nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP); and organizing pneumonia (OP) [63]. With T-DXd, OP and HP patterns have been observed and, in some severe cases, DAD [5,68,69].
DAD is the most aggressive presentation and is usually present in grade 4 DI-ILD. Features of DAD on CT include ground glass opacities (GGOs) with associated areas of consolidative opacities (Figure 3). OP is characterized by multifocal areas of GGO and peripheral consolidation. Reversed halo/atoll signs may also be seen (Figure 4). NSIP is characterized by GGO, which tends to be basal with peripheral reticular opacities (Figure 5). Features of HP on CT include diffuse GGO, ill-defined centrilobular nodules, mosaic attenuation on inspiratory images, and air trapping on expiratory CT images (Figure 6).
A diagnosis of DI-ILD requires interpretation of radiographic findings within the context of the clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory results. This may require multidisciplinary case conference discussions [70], but rapid diagnosis and upfront urgent management are critical to optimize outcomes.

6.2. Additional Investigations

Published guidelines recommend a number of additional procedures in the evaluation of possible DI-ILD, including sputum/blood culture, complete blood count; arterial blood gases; and respirology subspecialty consultation [1,5]. These investigations may not be essential for all patients and may be reserved for more complicated/nonresponding cases. All patients should be assessed for typical infectious processes and treated accordingly.
While blood tests alone cannot be used to diagnose DI-ILD, certain laboratory tests may play a supplementary role. Tests for nonspecific inflammatory response, tissue damage, and allergic reaction include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [30]. Tests such as Krebs von der Lungen-6 (KL-6), pulmonary surfactant protein-A (SP-A), pulmonary surfactant protein-D (SP-D), and drug lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) have been reported to be helpful prognostic indicators in studies [71,72,73], they are not generally available for clinical use. Tests that can aid in diagnosis and rule out infection include β-D glucan or galactomannan (invasive fungal infection), cytomegalovirus antigen, expectorated sputum bacterial smear and culture, acid-fast bacteria smear and culture, and viral and fungal polymerase chain reaction testing [63]. Bronchoscopy may be indicated if infection is suspected and has not been ruled out by less invasive investigations.
Cardiac testing for serologic markers of volume overload (beta-natriuretic peptide) may be helpful in the right clinical context.
  • Summary: Key Investigations for Patients Undergoing Treatment with T-DXd
●
Conduct a history and physical examination at baseline with the focus on known T-DXd-related ILD risk factors;
●
Ensure patient undergoes education and regular reminders concerning the potential adverse events associated with T-DXd and the need to immediately report symptoms, e.g., cough (particularly dry cough), shortness of breath/exertional dyspnea, fever, and unexplained fatigue;
●
Pulse oximetry (SpO2) should be performed at each clinic assessment, and an SpO2 < 95% or drop of more than 4% from baseline should prompt a detailed respiratory assessment;
●
Conduct baseline staging chest CT and restaging CT chest surveillance every 9–12 weeks:
⚬
Notify the radiologist to read the CT for both assessment of tumor response, as well as screening for ILD;
⚬
Conduct an HRCT promptly to confirm the diagnosis if ILD is suspected on the restaging CT but not confidently diagnosed or if ILD is clinically suspected but restaging is not required.
●
Patients with infectious/inflammatory opacities on CT scan should be considered for further evaluation to elucidate the cause and severity of these abnormalities:
⚬
Sputum for routine culture, acid-fast bacilli, and fungus; blood work to look for markers of inflammation and infection; beta-natriuretic peptide, echocardiogram, and PFT; consultation with infectious diseases or respirology; and bronchoscopy should all be considered in the appropriate clinical scenario.

7. Management of T-DXd—Related ILD

Because of the possibility of rapid ILD/pneumonitis progression and because holding treatment is critical in cases of T-DXd-related events, it is important not to delay implementation of the following management steps even when diagnosis may be uncertain (Figure 2).

7.1. Grade 1/Asymptomatic ILD

ILD can be fatal if it is left untreated, and progression to grade 2 or higher ILD precludes continued and future treatment with T-DXd [7]. Grade 1 disease will generally be diagnosed and managed by the oncologist or oncology delegate without the need for higher-level investigation or consultation. However, if the patient has a history of previous lung disease or if there is diagnostic uncertainty, assessment by respirology may be warranted.
Grade 1 ILD requires that T-DXd be withheld until recovery to grade 0 (normalization of CT abnormalities), at which point treatment may be resumed, with the dose depending on time to resolution [7]. If resolution occurs in 28 days or fewer from onset, the original dose of T-DXd can be maintained (5.4 mg/kg–6.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer), but dose escalation is not recommended, and some clinicians may choose to dose-reduce out of an abundance of caution. If resolution takes more than 28 days, the dose is reduced to 4.4 mg/kg after a first occurrence (5.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer). If there is a second occurrence, the dose is reduced to 3.2 mg/kg (4.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer). If there is a third occurrence of pneumonitis, or if the grade 1 ILD/pneumonitis event has not resolved within 18 weeks (126 days) from the last infusion, T-DXd must be permanently discontinued.
The Canadian Product Monograph for T-DXd recommends considering corticosteroid treatment for grade 1 DI-ILD (e.g., >0.5 mg/kg/day prednisolone or equivalent until improvement, with a gradual taper over 4 weeks or longer) [7]. Until there are further data to clarify the role of steroids for grade 1 events, the steering committee recommends following this guidance, especially if any DI-ILD-related risk factors are identified. Repeat HRCT should be considered prior to each of the next two doses of T-DXd to ensure no recurrence, after which conventional chest CT scans can resume at an interval of every 9 to 12 weeks.

7.2. Grade 2 ILD

Symptomatic ILD that does not interfere with activities of daily living (grade 2) requires permanent discontinuation of T-DXd and prompt initiation of systemic corticosteroid treatment (e.g., ≥1 mg/kg/day prednisolone or equivalent for at least 14 days followed by a gradual taper over at least a 4-week period) [7]. PJP prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) should be considered for all cases and is recommended for patients who are expected to be on corticosteroids at a dose of ≥20 mg for ≥1 month [74].
The patient’s symptoms should be monitored closely, with re-imaging conducted as clinically indicated. The steering committee recommends clinical reassessment 7 days after initiation of steroids and early, repeat imaging with low-dose CT scan 7 to 14 days after initiation of steroids for those with nonimproving or worsening symptoms. Precise timing of repeat chest imaging for those who are clearly responding to steroids can be determined by the treating oncologist but should occur within 4 to 6 weeks. If there is clinical or radiographic worsening (especially within 5 days of initiation of therapy), consideration should be given to increasing the dose of steroids (e.g., 2 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or equivalent) or switching to IV administration (e.g., methylprednisolone). A multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients is indicated. At this point, additional work-up for alternative etiologies and referral to respirology should be considered.

7.3. Grade 3 or 4 ILD

Patients with grade 3 or higher ILD need to be hospitalized because of supplemental oxygen requirements and ventilator support. Empiric high-dose methylprednisolone IV should be promptly initiated (e.g., 500 to 1000 mg/day for 3 days), followed by at least 1.0 mg/kg/day of prednisolone (or equivalent) for at least 14 days, followed by a gradual taper over at least 4 weeks. PJP prophylaxis with TMP-SMX should be considered for all cases and is recommended for patients who are expected to be on corticosteroids at a dose of ≥20 mg for ≥1 month [74].
A multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients is indicated. In-patient respirology consultation along with involvement of other relevant specialists should be considered, including but not limited to radiologists, intensivists, internists, and infectious disease specialists. The patient’s symptoms should be monitored closely, with re-imaging conducted as clinically indicated. The steering committee recommends daily clinical reassessment after initiation of steroids and early, repeat imaging with low-dose CT scan 7 to 14 days after initiation of steroids for those with nonimproving or worsening symptoms. Precise timing of repeat chest imaging for those who are clearly responding to steroids can be determined by the treating oncologist but should occur within 4 to 6 weeks. If there is clinical or radiographic worsening (especially within 5 days of initiation of therapy), additional work-up should be considered to explore alternative etiologies. Consider other immunosuppressants and/or treat per local practice.
  • Summary: Management of T-DXd-Related DI-ILD
  • Grade 1 DI-ILD
●
Interrupt T-DXd until resolved to grade 0 (resolution of CT abnormalities), then:
⚬
If resolved in ≤28 days from date of onset, maintain dose (starting dose is 5.4 mg/kg (6.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer));
⚬
If resolved in >28 days from date of onset, reduce dose one level:
●
Dose reduction with first occurrence: 4.4 mg/kg (5.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer);
●
Dose reduction with second occurrence: 3.2 mg/kg (4.4 mg/kg for gastric cancer).
⚬
Permanently discontinue T-DXd if there is a third recurrence;
⚬
Permanently discontinue T-DXd if the grade 1 ILD/pneumonitis event has not resolved within 18 weeks (126 days) from the last infusion.
●
Consider prednisolone ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day or equivalent with a gradual taper over ≥4 weeks, until improvement; *
●
Monitor and closely follow up in 2–7 days for onset of clinical symptoms and SpO2;
●
Consider follow-up imaging in 1–2 weeks or as clinically indicated.
  • Grade 2 DI-ILD
●
Permanently discontinue T-DXd;
●
Promptly initiate corticosteroid treatment as soon as ILD/pneumonitis is suspected: *
⚬
A total of 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or equivalent for ≥14 days;
⚬
Gradually taper over ≥4 weeks.
●
Monitor symptoms closely;
●
Re-image with HRCT within 7–14 days to confirm improvement and then re-image as clinically indicated;
●
If clinical or radiographic worsening or still no improvement (especially within 5 days):
⚬
Consider increasing dose of steroids (e.g., 2 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or equivalent), switching administration to i.v. (e.g., methylprednisolone); *
⚬
Reconsider additional work-up for alternative etiologies, as described above;
⚬
Escalate care as clinically indicated.
  • Grade 3+ DI-ILD
●
Permanently discontinue T-DXd;
●
Hospitalization required;
●
Promptly initiate empirical high-dose methylprednisolone IV treatment: *
⚬
Give 500–1000 mg/day for 3 days followed by ≥1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone (or equivalent) for ≥14 days;
⚬
Gradually taper over ≥4 weeks
●
Re-image with HRCT within 7–14 days to confirm improvement and then re-image as clinically indicated;
●
If clinical or radiographic worsening or still no improvement (especially within 5 days):
⚬
Reconsider additional work-up for alternative etiologies, as described above;
⚬
Consider other immunosuppressants and/or treat per local practice.
●
Consider involvement of respirology or internal medicine.
* Consider PJP prophylaxis with TMP-SMX for all patients—recommended for patients who are expected to be on corticosteroids at a dose of ≥20 mg for ≥1 month.

8. Conclusions

With the increase in novel therapies for cancer, the occurrence of DI-ILD is increasing and is a significant clinical challenge, as it requires early, presymptomatic diagnosis to avoid severe toxicity. Given the positive clinical trial results to date, T-DXd has the potential for widespread use in Canada in breast cancer and a variety of other malignancies. It is reasonable to expect that as the routine use of T-DXd increases, higher rates and grades of DI-ILD will be observed in real-world clinical care compared to that observed in randomized, controlled clinical trials. A proactive monitoring strategy aimed at early detection, along with a clear and rapidly initiated treatment algorithm, is critical to optimize clinical outcomes and minimize the risk of high-grade or fatal ILD [5,30].
T-DXd is unique among DI-ILD, because the occurrence of grade 2 or higher DI-ILD necessitates permanent cessation of the drug and even grade 1, asymptomatic findings require treatment interruption. To optimize treatment outcomes and minimize the risk of life-threatening T-DXd-related ILD, diligence in proactive monitoring is needed to ensure that potential cases of DI-ILD are identified and resolved in the earliest, asymptomatic stage (grade 1). This may require a multidisciplinary approach, involving the oncologist, radiologist, respirologist, and allied health care providers. Ongoing patient education ensuring awareness of the risks and the importance of reporting any potential symptoms of DI-ILD as soon as they occur is critical.
The need for closer monitoring of patients undergoing treatment with T-DXd, including a greater frequency of CT scans and the use of HRCT to confirm suspected cases of ILD, will translate to increased use of health care resources. A focus on screening, monitoring, and managing grade 1 ILD effectively will likely reduce the risk of progression to higher-grade lung toxicity. A novel and dedicated model of multidisciplinary care in oncology (medical oncologist, radiologist, and respirologist) in managing DI-ILD in breast cancer and other disease sites will likely be warranted as T-DXd, as well as other potentially pneumotoxic agents, become widely available in Canada (Table 4).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-W.H., C.B.-M., K.G., S.C., S.S., M.M. and J.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-W.H.; writing—review and editing, J.-W.H., C.B.-M., K.G., S.C., S.S., M.M.; D.R. and J.A.; supervision, J.-W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3).

Acknowledgments

Medical writing support was provided by Maryka Hladki of Science & Medicine Canada Inc. The manuscript was reviewed for medical accuracy by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; however, the authors retained full control of the content and made the final decisions for all aspects of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Jan-Willem Henning received honoraria and speaker’s fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Gilead, Knight Therapeutics, Eli-Lily, and Merck; is a member of advisory boards/speaker’s bureaus for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Gilead, Knight Therapeutics, Eli-Lily, and Merck; and received funding for grants and clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Novartis. Christine Brezden-Masley has received consultancy/advisory board honoraria from Astellas, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Seagen, Taiho, Sanofi, Knight, Agendia, Mylan, and Gilead; travel grant from Knight Pharmaceuticals; and research funds from Novartis, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. Karen Gelmon has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, BMS, and Roche; has been on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Seagan, Gilead, Merck, and Ayala; and she has received speaker honorarium from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly. Stephen Chia has received consultancy/advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, and Gilead; his institution has received research funding to conduct clinical trials from Novartis, Hoffmann LaRoche, Pfizer, Genomic Health (Exact Sciences), AstraZeneca, Genentech, Celgene, Amgen, BMS, Merck, Sanofi, PUMA, and Gilead. Shane Shapera has received consultancy/advisory board honoraria from Boehringer–Ingelheim, Hoffman La-Roche, and AstraZeneca; he has received research funding from Boehringer–Ingelheim, Hoffman La-Roche, Galecto Biotech, Galapagos, and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Micheal McInnis has received speaker fees from Boehringer–Ingelheim and consulting/advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca. Daniel Rayson has received advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, and his institution has received clinical trial support from AstraZeneca. Jamil Asselah has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Eisai, Ipsen, Taiho, Merck, and Novartis.

References

  1. Modi, S.; Saura, C.; Yamashita, T.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, S.B.; Tamura, K.; Andre, F.; Iwata, H.; Ito, Y.; Tsurutani, J.; et al. DESTINY-Breast01 Investigators. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated Her2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. André, F.; Hee Park, Y.; Kim, S.B.; Takano, T.; Im, S.A.; Borges, G.; Lima, J.P.; Aksoy, S.; Gavila Gregori, J.; De Laurentiis, M.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023, 401, 1773–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hurvitz, S.A.; Hegg, R.; Chung, W.P.; Im, S.A.; Jacot, W.; Ganju, V.; Chiu, J.W.Y.; Xu, B.; Hamilton, E.; Madhusudan, S.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023, 401, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Modi, S.; Jacot, W.; Yamashita, T.; Sohn, J.; Vidal, M.; Tokunaga, E.; Tsurutani, J.; Ueno, N.T.; Prat, A.; Chae, Y.S.; et al. DESTINY-Breast04 Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Swain, S.M.; Nishino, M.; Lancaster, L.H.; Li, B.T.; Nicholson, A.G.; Bartholmai, B.J.; Naidoo, J.; Schumacher-Wulf, E.; Shitara, K.; Tsurutani, J.; et al. Multidisciplinary clinical guidance on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis-Focus on proactive monitoring, diagnosis, and management. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2022, 106, 102378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rugo, H.S.; Bianchini, G.; Cortes, J.; Henning, J.W.; Untch, M. Optimizing treatment management of trastuzumab deruxtecan in clinical practice of breast cancer. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Enhertu (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for Injection) Product Monograph; AstraZeneca Canada Inc.: Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2023.
  8. Manich, S.C.; Modi, S.; Krop, I.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, S.; Tamura, K.; André, F.; Iwata, H.; Ito, Y.; Tsurutani, J.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Updated survival results from a phase II trial (DESTINY-Breast01). Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32 (Suppl. S5), S486. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shitara, K.; Bang, Y.J.; Iwasa, S.; Sugimoto, N.; Ryu, M.H.; Sakai, D.; Chung, H.C.; Kawakami, H.; Yabusaki, H.; Lee, J.; et al. DESTINY-Gastric01 Investigators. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ku, G.Y.; Di Bartolomeo, M.; Smyth, E.; Chau, I.; Park, H.; Siena, S.; Lonardi, S.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Ajani, J.A.; Chao, J.; et al. 1205MO Updated analysis of DESTINY-Gastric02: A phase II single-arm trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in western patients (Pts) with HER2-positive (HER2+) unresectable/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who progressed on or after trastuzumab-containing regimen. Ann. Oncol. 2022, 33, S1100. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, B.T.; Smit, E.F.; Goto, Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Udagawa, H.; Mazières, J.; Nagasaka, M.; Bazhenova, L.; Saltos, A.N.; Felip, E.; et al. DESTINY-Lung01 Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in Her2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smit, E.F.; Nakagawa, K.; Nagasaka, M.; Felip, E.; Goto, Y.; Li, B.T.; Pacheco, J.M.; Murakami, H.; Barlesi, F.; Saltos, A.N.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients with HER2-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Interim results of DESTINY-Lung01. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38 (Suppl. S15), 9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. ClinicalTrials.gov. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Participants with HER2-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (DESTINY-LUNG02). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04644237 (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  14. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Phase 2 Study of T-DXd in Patients With Selected HER2 Expressing Tumors (DPT02). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04482309 (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  15. ClinicalTrials.gov. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Participants with HER2-Overexpressing Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (DESTINY-CRC02). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04744831 (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  16. Kreuter, M.; Herth, F.J.; Wacker, M.; Leidl, R.; Hellmann, A.; Pfeifer, M.; Behr, J.; Witt, S.; Kauschka, D.; Mall, M.; et al. Exploring clinical and epidemiological characteristics of interstitial lung diseases: Rationale, aims, and design of a nationwide prospective registry—The EXCITING-ILD Registry. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 123876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Camus, P.; Bonniaud, P.; Fanton, A.; Camus, C.; Baudaun, N.; Foucher, P. Drug-induced and iatrogenic infiltrative lung disease. Clin. Chest Med. 2004, 25, 479–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Skeoch, S.; Weatherley, N.; Swift, A.J.; Oldroyd, A.; Johns, C.; Hayton, C.; Giollo, A.; Wild, J.M.; Waterton, J.C.; Buch, M.; et al. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: A systematic review. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Osawa, M.; Kudoh, S.; Sakai, F.; Endo, M.; Hamaguchi, T.; Ogino, Y.; Yoneoka, M.; Sakaguchi, M.; Nishimoto, H.; Gemma, A. Clinical features and risk factors of panitumumab-induced interstitial lung disease: A postmarketing all-case surveillance study. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 20, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sakurada, T.; Kakiuchi, S.; Tajima, S.; Horinouchi, Y.; Okada, N.; Nishisako, H.; Nakamura, T.; Teraoka, K.; Kawazoe, K.; Yanagawa, H.; et al. Characteristics of and risk factors for interstitial lung disease induced by chemotherapy for lung cancer. Ann. Pharmacother. 2015, 49, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schwaiblmair, M.; Behr, W.; Haeckel, T.; Märkl, B.; Foerg, W.; Berghaus, T. Drug induced interstitial lung disease. Open Respir. Med. J. 2012, 6, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yonemori, K.; Hirakawa, A.; Kawachi, A.; Kinoshita, F.; Okuma, H.; Nishikawa, T.; Tamura, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Takebe, N. Drug induced interstitial lung disease in oncology phase I trials. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 1830–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vansteenkiste, J. Nivolumab for NSCLC in Japanese patients: Similar benefits, but beware of pneumonitis. ESMO Open 2017, 2 (Suppl. S1), e000119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vial-Dupuy, A.; Sanchez, O.; Douvry, B.; Guetta, L.; Juvin, K.; Wermert, D.; Guérot, E.; Israël-Biet, D. Outcome of patients with interstitial lung disease admitted to the intensive care unit. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013, 30, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, S.Y.; Lim, S.Y.; Um, S.W.; Koh, W.J.; Chung, M.P.; Kim, H.; Kwon, O.J.; Park, H.K.; Kim, S.J.; Im, Y.H.; et al. Outcome and predictors of mortality in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure while undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy for solid cancers. Support. Care Cancer 2013, 21, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chikura, B.; Lane, S.; Dawson, J.K. Clinical expression of leflunomide-induced pneumonitis. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 1065–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mankikian, J.; Favelle, O.; Guillon, A.; Guilleminault, L.; Cormier, B.; Jonville-Béra, A.P.; Perrotin, D.; Diot, P.; Marchand-Adam, S. Initial characteristics and outcome of hospitalized patients with amiodarone pulmonary toxicity. Respir. Med. 2014, 108, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sato, T.; Inokuma, S.; Sagawa, A.; Matsuda, T.; Takemura, T.; Otsuka, T.; Saeki, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Sawada, T.; Study Committee for Leflunomide-induced Lung Injury; et al. Factors associated with fatal outcome of leflunomide-induced lung injury in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 1265–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yoshii, N.; Suzuki, T.; Nagashima, M.; Kon, A.; Kakihata, K.; Gemma, A. Clarification of clinical features of interstitial lung disease induced by irinotecan based on postmarketing surveillance data and spontaneous reports. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2011, 22, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kubo, K.; Azuma, A.; Kanazawa, M.; Kameda, H.; Kusumoto, M.; Genma, A.; Saijo, Y.; Sakai, F.; Sugiyama, Y.; Tatsumi, K.; et al. Japanese Respiratory Society Committee for formulation of Consensus statement for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced lung injuries. Consensus statement for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced lung injuries. Respir. Investig. 2013, 51, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sleijfer, S. Bleomycin-induced pneumonitis. Chest 2001, 120, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dabydeen, D.A.; Jagannathan, J.P.; Ramaiya, N.; Krajewski, K.; Schutz, F.A.; Cho, D.C.; Pedrosa, I.; Choueiri, T.K. Pneumonitis associated with mTOR inhibitors therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Incidence, radiographic findings and correlation with clinical outcome. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 1519–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baselga, J.; Campone, M.; Piccart, M.; Burris, H.A., 3rd; Rugo, H.S.; Sahmoud, T.; Noguchi, S.; Gnant, M.; Pritchard, K.I.; Lebrun, F.; et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Akamatsu, H.; Inoue, A.; Mitsudomi, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Nakagawa, K.; Mori, K.; Nukiwa, T.; Nakanishi, Y.; Yamamoto, N. Interstitial lung disease associated with gefitinib in Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: Combined analysis of two phase III trials (NEJ 002 and WJTOG 3405). Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 43, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hotta, K.; Kiura, K.; Takigawa, N.; Yoshioka, H.; Harita, S.; Kuyama, S.; Yonei, T.; Fujiwara, K.; Maeda, T.; Aoe, K.; et al. Comparison of the incidence and pattern of interstitial lung disease during erlotinib and gefitinib treatment in Japanese Patients with non-small cell lung cancer: The Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nakagawa, K.; Kudoh, S.; Ohe, Y.; Johkoh, T.; Ando, M.; Yamazaki, N.; Seki, A.; Takemoto, S.; Fukuoka, M. Postmarketing surveillance study of erlotinib in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An interim analysis of 3488 patients (POLARSTAR). J. Thorac. Oncol. 2012, 7, 1296–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pellegrino, B.; Facchinetti, F.; Bordi, P.; Silva, M.; Gnetti, L.; Tiseo, M. Lung toxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer patients exposed to ALK inhibitors: Report of a peculiar case and systematic review of the literature. Clin. Lung Cancer 2018, 19, e151–e161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nakano, K.; Seto, A.; Sasaki, T.; Shimbashi, W.; Fukushima, H.; Yonekawa, H.; Mitani, H.; Takahashi, S. Incidence and risk factors of interstitial lung disease of patients with head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab. Head Neck 2019, 41, 2574–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gemma, A.; Kusumoto, M.; Sakai, F.; Endo, M.; Kato, T.; Saito, Y.; Baba, T.; Sata, M.; Yamaguchi, O.; Yabuki, Y.; et al. Real-world evaluation of factors for interstitial lung disease incidence and radiologic characteristics in patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC treated with osimertinib in Japan. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1893–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Suh, C.H.; Kim, K.W.; Pyo, J.; Hatabu, H.; Nishino, M. The incidence of ALK inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2019, 132, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Suh, C.H.; Park, H.S.; Kim, K.W.; Pyo, J.; Hatabu, H.; Nishino, M. Pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Meta-analysis of 153 cohorts with 15,713 patients: Meta-analysis of incidence and risk factors of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis in NSCLC. Lung Cancer 2018, 123, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hackshaw, M.D.; Danysh, H.E.; Singh, J.; Ritchey, M.E.; Ladner, A.; Taitt, C.; Camidge, D.R.; Iwata, H.; Powell, C.A. Incidence of pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease induced by HER2-targeting therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2020, 183, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Banerji, U.; van Herpen, C.M.L.; Saura, C.; Thistlethwaite, F.; Lord, S.; Moreno, V.; Macpherson, I.R.; Boni, V.; Rolfo, C.; de Vries, E.G.E.; et al. Trastuzumab duocarmazine in locally advanced and metastatic solid tumours and HER2-expressing breast cancer: A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1124–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Manich, C.S.; O’Shaughnessy, J.; Aftimos, P.G.; van den Tweel, E.; Oesterholt, M.; Escrivá-de-Romaní, S.I.; Quenel Tueux, N.; Tan, T.J.; Lim, J.S.; Ladoire, S.; et al. Primary outcome of the phase III SYD985.002/TULIP trial comparing [vic-]trastuzumab duocarmazine to physician’s choice treatment in patients with pre-treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, S1288. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Qiu, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Shen, A.; Yuan, X.L.; Zhang, T.; Wei, X.L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Wang, D.S.; et al. A phase 1 multicenter, dose expansion study of ARX788 as monotherapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (ACE-Gastric-01). J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, e16059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hurvitz, S.A.; Park, H.; Frentzas, S.; Shannon, C.M.; Cuff, K.; Eek, R.W.; Budd, G.T.; McCartney, A.; O’Shaughnessy, J.; Lu, J.M.; et al. Safety and unique pharmacokinetic profile of ARX788, a site-specific ADC, in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-overexpresing solid tumors: Results from two phase 1 clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Flaherty, K.T.; Robert, C.; Hersey, P.; Nathan, P.; Garbe, C.; Milhem, M.; Demidov, L.V.; Hassel, J.C.; Rutkowski, P.; Mohr, P.; et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. M. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Verzanio (Abemaciclib) Product Monograph; Eli Lilly Canada: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019.
  49. Finn, R.S.; Rugo, H.S.; Gelmon, K.A.; Cristofanilli, M.; Colleoni, M.; Loi, S.; Schnell, P.; Lu, D.R.; Theall, K.P.; Mori, A.; et al. Long-term pooled safety analysis of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Updated analysis with up to 5 years of follow-up. Oncologist 2021, 26, e749–e755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kisqali (Ribociclib) Product Monograph; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.: Dorval, QC, Canada, 2012.
  51. Ma, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lu, W.; Guo, Q.; Wang, S.; You, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L. Risk of pneumonitis in cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and a pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 162, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Okada, N.; Matsuoka, R.; Sakurada, T.; Goda, M.; Chuma, M.; Yagi, K.; Zamami, Y.; Nishioka, Y.; Ishizawa, K. Risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease in patients with lung cancer: A single-institution retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Khunger, M.; Rakshit, S.; Pasupuleti, V.; Hernandez, A.V.; Mazzone, P.; Stevenson, J.; Pennell, N.A.; Velcheti, V. Incidence of pneumonitis with use of programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials. Chest 2017, 152, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Suzuki, Y.; Karayama, M.; Uto, T.; Fujii, M.; Matsui, T.; Asada, K.; Kusagaya, H.; Kato, M.; Matsuda, H.; Matsuura, S.; et al. Assessment of immune-related interstitial lung disease in patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicenter prospective study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kato, T.; Masuda, N.; Nakanishi, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Hida, T.; Sakai, H.; Atagi, S.; Fujita, S.; Tanaka, H.; Takeda, K.; et al. Nivolumab-induced interstitial lung disease analysis of two phase II studies patients with recurrent or advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2017, 104, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nishino, M.; Giobbie-Hurder, A.; Hatabu, H.; Ramaiya, N.H.; Hodi, F.S. Incidence of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor-related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Delaunay, M.; Cadranel, J.; Lusque, A.; Meyer, N.; Gounant, V.; Moro-Sibilot, D.; Michot, J.M.; Raimbourg, J.; Girard, N.; Guisier, F.; et al. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors associated with interstitial lung disease in cancer patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 50, 1700050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Barlési, F.; Villani, P.; Doddoli, C.; Gimenez, C.; Kleisbauer, J.P. Gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004, 18, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Singavi, A.K.; Ramalingam, V.; George, B. Etanercept for treatment of taxane-induced pneumonitis. J. Oncol. Pract. 2019, 15, 556–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Suthar, K.H.; Al Mutar, S.; Venkatesan, R. Oxaliplatin-induced pulmonary toxicity: A rare but serious complication. Cureus 2020, 12, e7483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Matsuno, O. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: Mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches. Respir. Res. 2012, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Powell, C.A.; Modi, S.; Iwata, H.; Takahashi, S.; Smit, E.F.; Siena, S.; Chang, D.Y.; Macpherson, E.; Qin, A.; Singh, J.; et al. Pooled analysis of drug-related interstitial lung disease and/or pneumonitis in nine trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy studies. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Conte, P.; Ascierto, P.A.; Patelli, G.; Danesi, R.; Vanzulli, A.; Sandomenico, F.; Tarsia, P.; Cattelan, A.; Comes, A.; De Laurentiis, M.; et al. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease during cancer therapies: Expert opinion on diagnosis and treatment. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumagai, K.; Aida, T.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Kishino, Y.; Kai, K.; Mori, K. Interstitial pneumonitis related to trastuzumab deruxtecan, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeting Ab-drug conjugate, in monkeys. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 4636–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Müller, N.L.; White, D.A.; Jiang, H.; Gemma, A. Diagnosis and management of drug-associated interstitial lung disease. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91 (Suppl. S2), S24–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hague, C.; McInnis, M.; Souza, C. High Resolution CT of the Chest Recommended Technique. February 2020. Available online: https://car.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/High-Resolution-CT-of-the-Chest-Recommended-Technique-2020.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2023).
  67. US Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. NDA/BLA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation {BLA 761139} ENHERTU (Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki); US Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gemma, A.; Kudoh, S.; Ando, M.; Ohe, Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Johkoh, T.; Yamazaki, N.; Arakawa, H.; Inoue, Y.; Ebina, M.; et al. Final safety and efficacy of erlotinib in the phase 4 POLARSTAR surveillance study of 10,708 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Johkoh, T.; Lee, K.S.; Nishino, M.; Travis, W.D.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Ryerson, C.J.; Franquet, T.; Bankier, A.A.; Brown, K.K.; et al. Chest CT diagnosis and clinical management of drug-related pneumonitis in patients receiving molecular targeting agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A position paper from the Fleischner Society. Chest 2021, 159, 1107–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Raghu, G.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Richeldi, L.; Thomson, C.C.; Inoue, Y.; Johkoh, T.; Kreuter, M.; Lynch, D.A.; Maher, T.M.; Martinez, F.J.; et al. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (an Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 205, e18–e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kohno, N.; Awaya, Y.; Oyama, T.; Yamakido, M.; Akiyama, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yokoyama, A.; Hamada, H.; Fujioka, S.; Hiwada, K. KL-6, a mucin-like glycoprotein, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with interstitial lung disease. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1993, 148, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ohnishi, H.; Yokoyama, A.; Yasuhara, Y.; Watanabe, A.; Naka, T.; Hamada, H.; Abe, M.; Nishimura, K.; Higaki, J.; Ikezoe, J.; et al. Circulating KL-6 levels in patients with drug induced pneumonitis. Thorax 2003, 58, 872–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kondo, A. Drug-induced pneumonitis. Kekkaku 1999, 74, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  74. Limper, A.H.; Knox, K.S.; Sarosi, G.A.; Ampel, N.M.; Bennett, J.E.; Catanzaro, A.; Davies, S.F.; Dismukes, W.E.; Hage, C.A.; Marr, K.A.; et al. American Thoracic Society Fungal Working Group. An official American Thoracic Society statement: Treatment of fungal infections in adult pulmonary and critical care patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183, 96–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Curroncol 30 00582 g002
Figure 2. Steering Committee recommendations for the multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis in patients undergoing treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). These guidelines have been adapted from guidelines published by Modi et al. [1] and Swain et al. [5] and based on the Canadian product monograph [7]. CBC: Complete blood count; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HRCT: High resolution computed tomograph; PJP: P jirovecii pneumonia; PFT: pulmonary function test; SpO2: oxygen saturation.
Figure 2. Steering Committee recommendations for the multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis in patients undergoing treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). These guidelines have been adapted from guidelines published by Modi et al. [1] and Swain et al. [5] and based on the Canadian product monograph [7]. CBC: Complete blood count; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HRCT: High resolution computed tomograph; PJP: P jirovecii pneumonia; PFT: pulmonary function test; SpO2: oxygen saturation.
Curroncol 30 00582 g002
Curroncol 30 00582 g003
Figure 3. Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). DAD is characterized by broad areas of ground glass opacity (GGO, asterisks) on CT, here seen with a geographic distribution, contrasting regions of abnormal, and normal lung (A–D).
Figure 3. Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). DAD is characterized by broad areas of ground glass opacity (GGO, asterisks) on CT, here seen with a geographic distribution, contrasting regions of abnormal, and normal lung (A–D).
Curroncol 30 00582 g003
Curroncol 30 00582 g004
Figure 4. Organizing pneumonia (OP). OP is characterized by multifocal areas of peripheral consolidation (asterisks) and less dense areas of ground glass opacity (arrows). Reversed halo/atoll signs may be seen. OP often fluctuates. (A) Typical OP at baseline: Large volume of consolidation (asterisk), predominantly in the left lower lobe, and mild surrounding GGO (arrow). (B) Follow-up image 3 months later shows complete resolution of left lower lobe findings and new right lower lobe consolidation (asterisk) and GGO (arrow).
Figure 4. Organizing pneumonia (OP). OP is characterized by multifocal areas of peripheral consolidation (asterisks) and less dense areas of ground glass opacity (arrows). Reversed halo/atoll signs may be seen. OP often fluctuates. (A) Typical OP at baseline: Large volume of consolidation (asterisk), predominantly in the left lower lobe, and mild surrounding GGO (arrow). (B) Follow-up image 3 months later shows complete resolution of left lower lobe findings and new right lower lobe consolidation (asterisk) and GGO (arrow).
Curroncol 30 00582 g004
Curroncol 30 00582 g005
Figure 5. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NISP). NSIP is characterized by ground glass opacity (GGO), which tends to be basal predominant with peripheral reticular opacities, seen in all images here (A–D) but best demonstrated in (D) (asterisk). Note sparing of the immediate subpleural lung in (B,C) (arrows), which is a hallmark of NSIP.
Figure 5. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NISP). NSIP is characterized by ground glass opacity (GGO), which tends to be basal predominant with peripheral reticular opacities, seen in all images here (A–D) but best demonstrated in (D) (asterisk). Note sparing of the immediate subpleural lung in (B,C) (arrows), which is a hallmark of NSIP.
Curroncol 30 00582 g005
Curroncol 30 00582 g006
Figure 6. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (A–D). HP often presents in its nonfibrotic form—seen here as subtle but diffuse ground glass opacity (GGO, asterisks), sometimes with an aspect of centrilobular nodularity. While GGO is nonspecific, mosaic lung attenuation with patchy spared lobules (arrows) is typical of the air trapping seen in HP.
Figure 6. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (A–D). HP often presents in its nonfibrotic form—seen here as subtle but diffuse ground glass opacity (GGO, asterisks), sometimes with an aspect of centrilobular nodularity. While GGO is nonspecific, mosaic lung attenuation with patchy spared lobules (arrows) is typical of the air trapping seen in HP.
Curroncol 30 00582 g006
Table 1. Key efficacy results in the T-DXd DESTINY trials.
Table 1. Key efficacy results in the T-DXd DESTINY trials.
StudynPopulationDesignMedian PFS, MonthsMedian OS, MonthsResponse Rate (RR), %Duration of Response, Months
DESTINY-Breast01 [1,8]184HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with previous treatment with trastuzumab emtansineOpen-label
Phase 2
Single arm		16.429.1Overall RR 60.914.8
DESTINY-Breast02 [2]608HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with previous treatment with trastuzumab emtansineOpen label
Phase 3
Randomized (T-DXd vs. investigator’s choice of treatment)		17.8 T-DXd vs. 6.9 investigator’s choice39.2 T-DXd vs. 26.5 investigator’s choiceObjective RR 69.7 T-DXd vs. 29.2 investigator’s choice19.6 T-DXd vs. 8.3 investigator’s choice
DESTINY-Breast03 [3]524HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxaneOpen label
Phase 3
Randomized (T-DXd vs. T-DM1)		28.8 T-DXd vs. 6.8 T-DM1Not reachedOverall RR 79 T-DXd vs. 35 T-DM136.6 T-DXd vs. 23.8 T-DM1
DESTINY-Breast04 [4]557HER2-low * metastatic breast cancer patients who received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy Open label
Phase 3
Randomized (T-DXd vs. physician’s choice of chemotherapy)		9.9 T-DXd vs. 5.1 physician’s choice of chemotherapy23.4 T-DXd vs. 16.8 physician’s choice of chemotherapyObjective RR 52.3 T-DXd vs. 16.3 physician’s choice of chemotherapy10.7 T-DXd vs. 6.8 physician’s choice of chemotherapy
DESTINY-Gastric01 [9]187HER2-positive advanced gastric cancerOpen label
Phase 2
Randomized
(T-DXd vs. physician’s choice of chemotherapy)		5.6 T-DXd vs. 3.6 physician’s choice of chemotherapy12.5 T-DXd vs. 8.4 physician’s choice of chemotherapyObjective RR 51 T-DXd vs. 14 physician’s choice of chemotherapy11.3 T-DXd
vs. 3.9 physician’s choice of chemotherapy
DESTINY-Gastric02 [10]79HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic gastric/GEJ cancerPhase 2
Single arm		5.612.1Objective RR 41.88.1
DESTINY-Lung01 [11]91HER2-mutant unresectable or metastatic NSCLCPhase 2
Single arm		8.217.8Objective RR 559.3
* Low expression of HER2 was defined as a score of 1+ on immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on in situ hybridization. GEJ: gastroesophageal junction; NR: not reported; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer; T-DXd: trastuzumab deruxtecan; T-DM1: trastuzumab emtansine.
Table 2. Incidence and severity of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis associated with various molecular targeting and immune checkpoint inhibitor anticancer treatments other than trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd).
Table 2. Incidence and severity of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis associated with various molecular targeting and immune checkpoint inhibitor anticancer treatments other than trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd).
TreatmentTumor TypesNumber of Studies (Number of Patients)Any Grade ILD, n (%)Grade 5 ILD, n (%)
Anti-HER2
Trastuzumab [42]HER2-positive advanced or unresectable/metastatic breast cancer8 (1642)162 (9.9)3 (0.2)
Lapatinib [42]HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer4 (4470)8 (0.2)0
T-DM1 [42]HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer3 (3290)15 (0.5)6 (0.2)
SYD985 [42,43] aHER2-expressing b locally advanced or metastatic breast, gastric, urothelial, or endometrial cancer 1 (185)4 (2.2)1 (0.5)
SYD985 [44]HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer1 (291)NR (7.6)2 (0.7)
ARX788 [45]HER2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer1 (23)NR 0
ARX788 [46] cHER2-positive advanced breast cancer1 (69)NR (4.3) c NR
ARX788 [46] cHER2-positive advanced solid tumors1 (34)NR (2.9) cNR
TKI and/or EGFR inhibitor
Gefitinib [34] dEGFR-mutated NSCLC2 (201)10 (5.0)2 (1.0)
Gefitinib [35] dNSCLC1 (330)8 (2.4)6 (1.8)
Erlotinib [36] dRecurrent/advanced NSCLCNA (3488)158 (4.5)55 (1.6)
Crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, TSR-011, ASP3026, or ensartinib [37]NSCLCNA (4943)37 (0.7)5 (0.1) e
Cetuximab [38] dHead and neck squamous cancerNA (201)9 (4.5)1 (0.5)
Osimertinib [39] dEGFR-mutated inoperable or recurrent NSCLCNA (3578)231 (6.5) f29 (0.8)
Alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, or brigatinib [40] gAdvanced NSCLC18 (2261)NR (2.14)NR (0.22)
Erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib [41] gAdvanced NSCLC144 (15,713)NR (1.12)NR (0.20)
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or durvalumab [52] dLung cancerNA (102)19 (18.6)4 (3.9)
Nivolumab or pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitors) [53] a,gNSCLC12 (3232)NR (3.6)7 (NR)
Atezolizumab, durvalumab, or avelumab (PD-L1 inhibitors) [53] a,gNSCLC7 (1806)NR (1.3)0
Anti-PD-1 monotherapy [54] dNSCLCNA (138)20 (14.5)3 (2.2)
Nivolumab [55] dRecurrent or advanced NSCLC2 (111)8 (7.2)1 (0.9)
PD-L1 inhibitors [56] a,gMelanoma, NSCLC, or renal cell carcinoma20 (4496)NR (2.7)NR
CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1 inhibitors [57]NSCLC, melanoma, cavum, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, or UCNTNR (1862)64 (3.5)6 (0.3)
CDK4/6 Inhibitors
Abemaciclib [48]Metastatic breast cancer3 (900)NR (3.2)NR (0.4)
Palbociclib [49]HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer3 (872)6 (0.69)0 (0)
Ribociclib [50]HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer3 (1153)NR (1.6)NR (0.1)
CTLA-4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR: hormone receptor; ILD: interstitial lung disease; NA: nonapplicable; NR: not reported; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer; PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1: Programmed cell death ligand 1; SYD985: trastuzumab duocarmazine; T790M: methionine substitution for threonine at amino acid position 790; T-DM1: trastuzumab emtansine; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor; UCNT: undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type. a The study was specific to pneumonitis. b HER2 expression was required for eligibility for the dose-expansion phase of this study (n = 146). Patients were eligible for the dose-escalation phase (n = 39) regardless of their HER2 status. c Percentages were only reported for grade > 3 pneumonitis. d Study conducted in Japanese patients only. e ILD grade information was unavailable for 11 patients who had ILD events. f The ILD cases reported here were those that were adjudicated by an ILD expert committee; there were 245 patients with ILD reported by their attending physicians. g The pooled incidence of pneumonitis was reported. Reprinted from Cancer Treatment Reviews, Vol. 106, Swain S.M., et al. [5], Multidisciplinary clinical guidance on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis-Focus on proactive monitoring, diagnosis, and management, 102378., Copyright (2022), with permission from Elsevier.
Table 3. Rates of interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis in the T-DXd DESTINY clinical trials.
Table 3. Rates of interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis in the T-DXd DESTINY clinical trials.
Studyn *PopulationILD Incidence (T-DXd Arm), %
Any GradeGrade 1 or 2Grade 5
DESTINY-Breast01 [1]184HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with previous treatment with trastuzumab emtansine13.610.9 2.2
DESTINY-Breast02 [2]404HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with previous treatment with trastuzumab emtansine10.49.20.5
DESTINY-Breast03 [3]257HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane15.24.30
DESTINY-Breast04 [4]371HER2-low † metastatic breast cancer patients who received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy 12.1100.8
DESTINY-Gastric01 [9]125HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer9.67.2 0
DESTINY-Gastric02 [10]79HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic gastric/GEJ cancer10.1 7.62.5
DESTINY-Lung01 [11]91HER2-mutant unresectable or metastatic NSCLC26.419.82.2
* T-D0058d arm. † Low expression of HER2 was defined as a score of 1+ upon immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on in situ hybridization. GEJ: gastroesophageal junction; NR: not reported; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer; T-DXd: trastuzumab deruxtecan; T-DM1: trastuzumab emtansine.
Table 4. Roles of the multidisciplinary team in the management of DI-ILD.
Table 4. Roles of the multidisciplinary team in the management of DI-ILD.
Medical OncologistRadiologistRespirologist
  • Taking a detailed history for relevant risk factors
  • Monitoring for potential signs and symptoms
  • Notifying the radiologist that the patient is taking a drug that could lead to DI-ILD
  • Treatment of all stages of ILD/pneumonitis
  • Referral to respirology if required
  • Knowing that the patient is taking a drug with known pulmonary toxicities
  • Prompt communication of any findings suspicious of ILD/pneumonitis
  • Evaluating patients with pre-existing lung comorbidities (asthma, COPD, ILD, etc.) before starting treatment with T-DXd
  • Conducting baseline PFTs for patients with a history of lung comorbidities (if not already performed)
  • Assisting in treatment decisions for grade 2 or higher ILD/pneumonitis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Henning, J.-W.; Brezden-Masley, C.; Gelmon, K.; Chia, S.; Shapera, S.; McInnis, M.; Rayson, D.; Asselah, J. Managing the Risk of Lung Toxicity with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd): A Canadian Perspective. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 8019-8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090582

AMA Style

Henning J-W, Brezden-Masley C, Gelmon K, Chia S, Shapera S, McInnis M, Rayson D, Asselah J. Managing the Risk of Lung Toxicity with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd): A Canadian Perspective. Current Oncology. 2023; 30(9):8019-8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Henning, Jan-Willem, Christine Brezden-Masley, Karen Gelmon, Stephen Chia, Shane Shapera, Micheal McInnis, Daniel Rayson, and Jamil Asselah. 2023. "Managing the Risk of Lung Toxicity with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd): A Canadian Perspective" Current Oncology 30, no. 9: 8019-8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090582

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop