Next Article in Journal
Incorporating Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Clinically Node-Positive Women Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Shared Decision-Making Model and Nuanced Approached to the Axilla
Previous Article in Journal
New Generation of 3D Virtual Models with Perfusional Zones: Perioperative Assistance for the Best Pedicle Management during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth

by
Pierre J. A. Villeneuve
1,2,* and
Christopher Bredeson
1,2
1
Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
2
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(4), 4033-4040; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040305
Submission received: 13 February 2023 / Revised: 26 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 3 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Therapy)

Abstract

New therapies in a publicly funded healthcare system are first appraised by health technology assessment agencies that provide funding recommendations to the payers. Treatment with Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy is revolutionizing the management of patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma by providing an effective alternative to the standard of care. Yet, the implementation of CAR-T treatment has a substantial impact on the healthcare system due to its high cost, complex manufacturing process, and requirement for highly specialized services and expertise. CAR-T Cells, as a “living drug”, are fundamentally different from usual medications, and their approvals and funding recommendations pose unique challenges to the health technology agency. In this paper, we explore the specific challenges that face the health technology agencies in reviewing reimbursement recommendations for CAR-T therapy. We take a Canadian perspective and use CAR-T treatment of relapse/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma as an example.
Keywords: CAR-T; CADTH; health technology assessment; HTA CAR-T; CADTH; health technology assessment; HTA

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villeneuve, P.J.A.; Bredeson, C. CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 4033-4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040305

AMA Style

Villeneuve PJA, Bredeson C. CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth. Current Oncology. 2023; 30(4):4033-4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villeneuve, Pierre J. A., and Christopher Bredeson. 2023. "CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth" Current Oncology 30, no. 4: 4033-4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040305

APA Style

Villeneuve, P. J. A., & Bredeson, C. (2023). CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value’s Worth. Current Oncology, 30(4), 4033-4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040305

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop