Next Article in Journal
Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of 177Lu-Dotatate Induction and Maintenance Therapy of Various Types of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Phase II Registry Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 28
Issue 1
10.3390/curroncol28010016
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen

by
Ruiqi Chen
1,
Xing Liu
2,3,
Arjun D. Law
1,
Solaf Kanfar
1,
Dawn Maze
1,
Steven M. Chan
1,
Vikas Gupta
1,
Karen W. Yee
1,
Mark D. Minden
1,
Aaron D. Schimmer
1,
Andre C. Schuh
1,
Caroline J. McNamara
1,
Tracy Murphy
1,
Anna Xu
2,
Umberto Falcone
4,
Jack Seki
1,2,3 and
Hassan Sibai
1,*
1
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
2
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada
3
Department of Pharmacy, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
4
Department of Haematology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28(1), 128-137; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010016
Submission received: 9 August 2020 / Revised: 15 December 2020 / Accepted: 17 December 2020 / Published: 22 December 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in patients treated with asparaginase (ASNase)-including regiments. However, VTE risk in adult Philadelphia-positive ALL (Ph+ve ALL) patients treated with non-hyperCVAD chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we examined VTE incidence in adult Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a pediatric-inspired asparaginase (ASNase)-free regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol. Methods: a single centre retrospective review of Ph+ve ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008–2019 with imatinib plus modified DFCI protocol was conducted. Results: of the 123 patients included, 30 (24.3%) had at least 1 radiology confirmed VTE event from diagnosis to the end of maintenance therapy. 86.7% (26/30) of the VTE events occurred during active treatment. Of all VTE events, the majority (53.3%) were DVT and/or PE while another significant portion were catheter-related (40.0%). Major bleeding was observed in 1 patient on VTE treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Conclusion: a high VTE incidence (24.3%) was observed in adults Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus an ASNase-free modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol, suggesting prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for all adult Ph+ve ALL patients including those treated with ASNase-free regimens.

1. Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in oncology patients, either as a presenting symptom or as a complication of treatment [1]. Active neoplasms create a hypercoagulable state through several mechanisms. Neoplasms release increased tumour procoagulants, activate platelets, and increase endothelial tissue factor expression. Simultaneously, physiological anticoagulants and fibrinolytic activity are reduced [2]. Hematological malignancies have an elevated VTE risk that is comparable to high-risk solid tumours including brain, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer [3].
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are classified in two main subcategories, Philadelphia-negative (Ph-ve) and Philadelphia-positive (Ph+ve) ALL, as chemotherapeutic approaches are different [4]. Ph+ve ALL is characterized by a t(9;22) translocation and is found in approximately 20% of ALL patients [5]. Previous reports showed that VTE incidence in ALL patients ranges from 10.3% to 40.8% [6,7,8,9]. Several risk factors including age, sex, Philadelphia chromosome status, and asparaginase (ASNase) treatment were associated with VTE incidence in ALL patients [7]. ASNase is a well-known risk factor as it can lead to a significantly increased risk for VTE development, in large via mechanisms through the inhibition of hepatic protein synthesis including antithrombin III and protein C/S [10,11]. As a result, the prevention of VTE complications in patients receiving ASNase-based chemotherapy has remained in focus [12]. Several studies show that anticoagulation prophylaxis may be recommended in Ph-ve ALL patients as most receive ASNase at some point [9,13]. However, this is not a standard recommendation in adult Ph+ve ALL, which is typically treated with chemotherapy in combination with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Previously, the MD Anderson Cancer Centre reported an overall VTE incidence of 29% (n = 14/49) in Ph+ve ALL patients treated with the Hyper-CVAD protocol and established that Philadelphia chromosome positivity alone was a risk factor for VTE compared to Ph-ve ALL (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.21–6.21) [7].
The incidence of VTE in adult Ph+ve ALL patients treated other protocols requires further research. Our centre uses imatinib plus a pediatric-inspired regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) protocol [20]. Of note, the current modified DFCI protocol for Ph+ve ALL does not contain ASNase, which has been removed from our practice in 2008 due to unacceptable hepatic toxicity. Herein, we describe our experience with imatinib in combination with an ASNase-free pediatric inspired protocol in adults with Ph+ve ALL and examine the patterns of VTE in this population.

2. Methods

This study entails a single centre retrospective chart review of Ph+ve ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008–2019 with an imatinib-containing DFCI protocol-based regimen that omitted ASNase. Patients were identified from the hospital leukemia database. Patient electronic medical records and hospital pharmacy records were reviewed. Institutional ethics review board approval was obtained (Approval by The University Health Network Research Ethics Board, code 15-5077.4, 25 April 2016).
The treatment regimen under the modified DFCI protocol is summarized in Figure 1a, while patients above 60 years old received a reduced intensity protocol described in Figure 1b. Of note, allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) was traditionally offered to all adult Ph+ve patients after receiving induction chemotherapy, but the practice has been evolving as continuation with chemotherapy + TKI in patients who showed >3 log reduction after induction has gained popularity in recent years [21]. Patients were included in this study if ≥18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of Ph+ve ALL, underwent imatinib plus the ASNase-free modified DFCI protocol, and achieved complete morphological remission after induction chemotherapy. Patients who received VTE prophylaxis were excluded from the analysis. Patients were followed until they completed the modified DFCI protocol, underwent BMT, relapsed, stopped DFCI regimen early due to intolerance, died during treatment, or were lost to follow up.
The primary objective for this study was to characterize the incidence of VTE in adults with Ph+ve ALL during the entire ASNase-free DFCI treatment course. All VTE events were radiologically proven, including PE, DVT, line-related thrombosis, or others. Line-related thrombosis was categorized as PICC-line related and central venous catheter (CVC) related. The incidence of VTE was calculated as a fraction of all patients that underwent the modified DFCI treatment rather than those who actually completed each phase. The former method was chosen as a conservative measurement to preclude overestimation. Co-variants of age, sex, weight, BMI, follow-up time, Padua score, white blood cell count, and platelet count were also collected.
Descriptive statistics are used to summarize baseline patient demographics, disease characteristics, and laboratory data. Categorical variables such as sex, VTE proportions, and VTE sites are summarized with counts and percentages. Continuous variables such as age at diagnosis and weight are expressed as means ± standard deviation or medians with ranges. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact tests when appropriate. Continuous variables for the 2 groups were compared using a two-tailed student’s t-test for parametric tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric test. The cumulative incidence of VTE was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the end of modified DFCI treatment, including at the time of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. All p-values were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significantly different result.

3. Results

Overall, 123 patients were included in our analysis with baseline characteristics summarized in Table 1. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 49.9 years (range 17.4–80.9 years), with 45.5% being females. The average weight of the whole cohort was 74.7 kg (41.7–127 kg) and the average BMI was 26.4 kg/m2 (18.9–52.2 kg/m2). All patients received imatinib as the first-line TKI and completed modified DFCI induction. Of the 123 patients, 90 (73.2%) received the standard protocol (Figure 1a) while 33 (26.8%) received reduced intensity DFCI due to age >60 (Figure 1b). Notably, among the 123 patients, 106 (86.2%) completed induction, 82 (66.7%) completed intensification, and 48 (39.0%) completed the full treatment course. Among the patients who did not complete the DFCI protocol, 44 proceeded to bone marrow transplant, 14 passed away, 13 had relapsed, 4 stopped due to toxicity, and 1 was lost in follow up.
Overall, 30 (24.3%) patients had at least 1 VTE events from diagnosis to the end of treatment. The mean age was older in patients who developed VTE versus those who did not (p = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference between patients who developed VTE in comparison to patients who did not develop VTE in terms of sex, weight, BMI, WBC count, or blast percentage (Table 1). The mean Padua score for these patients was 5.4 with a range of 3–10.
The majority of the VTE events occurred during active modified DFCI treatment plus imatinib, with 10 (8.1%), 11 (8.9%), and 5 (4.1%) occurring during induction, intensification, and maintenance, respectively (Figure 2). Only 4 patients (3.1%) had VTE at the time of leukemia diagnosis. Of all 30 patients developed VTE, 16 (53.3%) were DVT and/or PE, 12 (40.0%) were PICC/CVC-related, and 2 (6.7%) involved a cardiac thrombus (Figure 3). For line-related thrombosis, 3 events were noted among 79 patients with CVC (~4% incidence), whereas 9 events were found from 44 patients on PICC-line (~20% incidence). A second thrombotic event during the modified DFCI treatment happened in 2 patients while on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment. With regard to bleeding risk, of the 10 patients who developed VTE during induction, 9 had days with platelet level of less than 50 bil/L (Table 2). In contrast, of the 11 patients who had VTE during intensification, only 2 had days with platelet level of less than 50 bil/L. When patients developed VTE during treatment, chemotherapy was temporarily held for 2 weeks and full-dose tinzaparin or enoxaparin was initiated. Two patients had experienced a recurrent VTE episode within a year while on LMWH treatment.
In terms of safety, only major bleeding events were collected in accordance to the guideline from International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) [22]. Major bleeding following anticoagulation was rare, which happened in 1 of the 30 patients who developed VTE throughout the treatment course followed by LMWH treatment. This patient developed a right atrial clot during the induction phase while in the ICU, and experienced a major bleeding into the psoas muscle while on LMWH plus platelet transfusion treatment. In this patient, LMWH was withheld for at least 1 week, and during this time no breakthrough VTE event occurred. No major bleeding events were observed in any of the other patients, including those who received therapeutic doses of LMWH after being diagnosed with VTE.

4. Discussion

The incidence of thrombosis in Ph+ve ALL is not well understood. In this study, we describe the largest adult Ph+ve ALL patient cohort published to date to characterize the thrombosis risk in this group. We have demonstrated that Ph+ve ALL patients receiving an ASNase-free protocol have a high risk of VTE development (30/123, 24.3%) from diagnosis to the end of treatment, with the majority of VTE events happening during induction and intensification phases (Figure 2). Although the incidence of VTE was slightly lower than the previously published VTE incidence (29%) in adult Ph+ve ALL patients receiving Hyper-CVAD [23], the results from our cohort suggest that the risk of thrombosis may have been underestimated in patients receiving ASNase-free protocols.
With regard to the site of VTE development, half of VTE events were DVT and/or PE (Figure 3). Catheter-related thrombosis also accounted for 40.0% of total VTE events and 9.8% of the total patient cohort, but this incidence was similar to previously reported central line-related thrombosis in cancer patients [24]. These results suggest that the high VTE incidence in Ph+ve ALL patients is multifactorial rather than related to leukemia alone [25,26]. In this study, age was a statistically significant cofactor associated with VTE (p = 0.010). This may be an independent predictor for VTE risk, but also may be a surrogate factor for underlying reasons, such as potentially more physical inactivity, artherosclerosis, and endothelial damages. Other factors may include chemotherapy other than ASNase (i.e., doxorubicin [27]), high dose corticosteroids [28], and PICC line use [24]. In fact, PICC-line related thrombosis happed in approximately 20% of patients while CVC-related thrombosis was only observed in 4% of patients. The decision of choosing CVC vs. PICC lines currently mainly depends on availability and patient preferences. This finding is another reminder that CVC may be preferred over PICC line from a thrombosis standpoint. Interestingly, in our practice, we only diagnosed line-related thrombosis in symptomatic patients with doppler ultrasound or incidental finding by CT scan. The full extent of line-related thrombosis in this group of patients would require a screening process that may warrant further studies. Of note, imatinib and dasatinib are not known to be pro-thrombotic [29,30,31]. We did not include patients who received ponatinib since we do not use it in the first-line setting, as well as its known thrombogenic effects.
The high thrombosis risk in Ph+ve ALL patients treated with the ASNase-free DFCI raises the question of whether anticoagulation prophylaxis is warranted. Previous studies of anticoagulation prophylaxis in Ph-ve ALL patients treated with ASNase-containing DFCI protocol showed a significant reduction of VTE with daily low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injections [9,13,32]. A major concern for anticoagulation prophylaxis is the risk of bleeding as ALL patients tend to have concurrent thrombocytopenia and hypercoagulability. One incidence of potentially LMWH-related major bleeding was noted in this study, suggesting that albeit low, there is a chance for major bleeding in patients treated with LMWH. Therefore, there is a need to carefully select patients with respect to patient factors, phase of treatment, choice of anticoagulant, dosing strategies in the presence of thrombocytopenia, and the impact of central venous catheters which warrant further studies.
Traditionally, LMWH has been used for anticoagulation prophylaxis, but its need for daily injections and continued VTE breakthrough from LMWH prophylaxis had led to considerations of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) [33]. Since recent studies showed the effectiveness of DOACs as prophylaxis agents as well as treatment for VTE in adults with solid tumours [34,35,36], further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of both LMWH and DOACs for VTE prophylaxis in Ph+ve ALL patients.
Our study is limited for its retrospective and descriptive nature. Therefore, several important factors such as comorbidities and minor bleeding events cannot be determined accurately, hindering the identification of potential predictors and safety profile characterizations. In addition, the retrospective nature of the study also did not allow us to fully elucidate asymptomatic thrombosis events such as calf vein thrombosis and incidental PE. Importantly, incidental PE may be a factor that contributes to cancer-related mortality [37,38] that were not captured in this study. Future prospective verifications will be needed to provide further insights into VTE risk and potential management options.

5. Conclusions

VTE was observed in 24.3% of adults with Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus an ASNase-free modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol. The majority of VTE events occurred during active treatment phases such as induction and intensification. DVT/PE consisted the majority of the thrombosis events while line-related thrombosis was also significant. The high observed VTE incidence suggests that future anticoagulation prophylaxis studies should include Ph+ve ALL instead of just focusing on ASNase-based treatment for Ph-ve ALL patients, especially if additional thromboembolic risk factors are present.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., X.L., J.S., H.S.; methodology, R.C., X.L., H.S.; formal analysis, R.C., X.L.; investigation, R.C., X.L., S.K., U.F., A.X.; resources, H.S.; data curation, R.C., X.L., S.K., U.F., A.X.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, A.D.L., D.M., S.M.C., V.G., K.W.Y., M.D.M., A.D.S., A.C.S., C.J.M., T.M.; visualization, R.C.; supervision, H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. White, R.H. The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolic Disease Venous Thromboembolism. Circulation 2003, 107, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Varki, A. Trousseau’s syndrome: Multiple definitions and multiple mechanisms. Blood 2007, 110, 1723–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Falanga, A.; Marchetti, M.; Russo, L. Venous thromboembolism in the hematologic malignancies. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2012, 24, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amriah, B. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016, 127, 2391–2405. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moorman, A.V.; Harrison, C.J.; Buck, G.A.N.; Richards, S.M.; Secker-Walker, L.M.; Martineau, M.; Vance, G.H.; Cherry, A.M.; Higgins, R.R.; Fielding, A.K.; et al. Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): Analysis of cytogenetic data from patients treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. Blood 2007, 109, 3189–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. de stefano, V.; Sora, F.; Rossi, E.; Chiusolo, P.; Laurenti, L.; Fianchi, L.; Zini, G.; Pagano, L.; Sica, S.; Leone, G. The risk of thrombosis in patients with acute leukemia: Occurrence of thrombosis at diagnosis and during treatment. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vu, K.; Luong, N.V.; Hubbard, J.; Zalpour, A.; Faderl, S.; Thomas, D.A.; Yang, D.; Kantarjian, H.; Kroll, M.H. A retrospective study of venous thromboembolism in acute leukemia patients treated at the university of texas MD anderson cancer center. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Elliott, M.A.; Wolf, R.C.; Hook, C.C.; Pruthi, R.K.; Heit, J.A.; Letendre, L.L.; Tefferi, A.; Kaufmann, S.H.; Mesa, R.A.; Litzow, M.R. Thromboembolism in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during induction with L-asparaginase-containing multi-agent regimens: Incidence, risk factors, and possible role of antithrombin. Leuk. Lymphoma 2004, 45, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grace, R.F.; DeAngelo, D.J.; Stevenson, K.E.; Neuberg, D.; Sallan, S.E.; Abou Mourad, Y.R.; Bergeron, J.; Seftel, M.D.; Kokulis, C.; Connors, J.M. The use of prophylactic anticoagulation during induction and consolidation chemotherapy in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2018, 45, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Stefano, V.; Za, T.; Ciminello, A.; Betti, S.; Rossi, E. Haemostatic alterations induced by treatment with asparaginases and clinical consequences. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 114, 247–261. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bade, N.A.; Lu, C.; Patzke, C.L.; Baer, M.R.; Duong, V.H.; Law, J.Y.; Lee, S.T.; Sausville, E.A.; Zimrin, A.B.; Duffy, A.P.; et al. Optimizing pegylated asparaginase use: An institutional guideline for dosing, monitoring, and management. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2019, 26, 74–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kekre, N.; Connors, J.M. Venous thromboembolism incidence in hematologic malignancies. Blood Rev. 2019, 33, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sibai, H.; Seki, J.T.; Wang, T.Q.; Sakurai, N.; Atenafu, E.G.; Yee, K.W.; Schuh, A.C.; Gupta, V.; Minden, M.D.; Schimmer, A.D.; et al. Venous thromboembolism prevention during asparaginase-based therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rives, S.; Estella, J.; Gómez, P.; López-Duarte, M.; de Miguel, P.G.; Verdeguer, A.; Moreno, M.J.; Vivanco, J.L.; Couselo, J.M.; Fernández-Delgado, R.; et al. Intermediate dose of imatinib in combination with chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves early outcome in paediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): Results of the Spanish Cooperative Group SHOP studies ALL-94, ALL-99 and ALL-2005. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 154, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Biondi, A.; Schrappe, M.; De Lorenzo, P.; Castor, A.; Lucchini, G.; Gandemer, V.; Pieters, R.; Stary, J.; Escherich, G.; Campbell, M.; et al. Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): A randomised, open-label, intergroup study. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schultz, K.R.; Carroll, A.; Heerema, N.A.; Bowman, W.P.; Aledo, A.; Slayton, W.B.; Sather, H.; Devidas, M.; Zheng, H.W.; Davies, S.M.; et al. Long-term follow-up of imatinib in pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children’s oncology group study AALL0031. Leukemia 2014, 28, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rowe, J.M.; Buck, G.; Burnett, A.K.; Chopra, R.; Wiernik, P.H.; Richards, S.M.; Lazarus, H.M.; Franklin, I.M.; Litzow, M.R.; Ciobanu, N.; et al. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993. Blood 2005, 106, 3760–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. DeAngelo, D.J.; Stevenson, K.E.; Dahlberg, S.E.; Silverman, L.B.; Couban, S.; Supko, J.G.; Amrein, P.C.; Ballen, K.K.; Seftel, M.D.; Turner, A.R.; et al. Long-term outcome of a pediatric-inspired regimen used for adults aged 18-50 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2015, 29, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daver, N.; Thomas, D.; Ravandi, F.; Cortes, J.; Garris, R.; Jabbour, E.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Borthakur, G.; Kadia, T.; Rytting, M.; et al. Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic Leukemia. Haematologica 2015, 100, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Thyagu, S.; Minden, M.D.; Gupta, V.; Yee, K.W.; Schimmer, A.D.; Schuh, A.C.; Lipton, J.H.; Messner, H.A.; Xu, W.; Brandwein, J.M. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with imatinib combined with a paediatric-based protocol. Br. J. Haematol. 2012, 158, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, L.P.; Zhang, X.H.; Chen, H.; Qin, Y.Z.; Ruan, G.R.; Jiang, H.; Jia, J.S.; Zhao, T.; et al. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018, 24, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Schulman, S.; Kearon, C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 692–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Luong, N.V.; Kroll, M.H.; Vu, K. Recurrence of venous thromboembolism among adults acute leukemia patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Incidence and risk factors. Thromb. Res. 2017, 156, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Refaei, M.; Fernandes, B.; Brandwein, J.; Goodyear, M.D.; Pokhrel, A.; Wu, C. Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in acute leukemia patients: A comparative, retrospective study of the safety of peripherally inserted vs. centrally inserted central venous catheters. Ann. Hematol. 2016, 95, 2057–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Noble, S.; Pasi, J. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of cancer-associated thrombosis. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, S2–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Timp, J.F.; Braekkan, S.K.; Versteeg, H.H.; Cannegieter, S.C. Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood 2013, 122, 1712–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, S.H.; Lim, K.M.; Noh, J.Y.; Kim, K.; Kang, S.; Chang, Y.K.; Shin, S.; Chung, J.H. Doxorubicin-induced platelet procoagulant activities: An important clue for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Toxicol. Sci. 2011, 124, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Johannesdottir, S.A.; Horváth-Puhó, E.; Dekkers, O.M.; Cannegieter, S.C.; Jørgensen, J.O.; Ehrenstein, V.; Vandenbroucke, J.P.; Pedersen, L.; Sørensen, H.T. Use of glucocorticoids and risk of venous thromboembolism: A nationwide population-based case-control study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Moslehi, J.J.; Deininger, M. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated cardiovascular toxicity in chronic myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 4210–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pasvolsky, O.; Leader, A.; Iakobishvili, Z.; Wasserstrum, Y.; Kornowski, R.; Raanani, P. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor associated vascular toxicity in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cardio Oncol. 2015, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gustafson, D.; Fish, J.E.; Lipton, J.H.; Aghel, N. Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Toxicity of BCR-ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2020, 15, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sibai, H.; Chen, R.; Liu, X.; Falcone, U.; Schimmer, A.; Schuh, A.; Law, A.; McNamara, C.; Maze, D.; Yee, K.; et al. Anticoagulation prophylaxis reduces venous thromboembolism rate in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with asparaginase-based therapy. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fulcher, J.; Carrier, M. Thromboembolism prophylaxis during L-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia—Time to reconsider current approaches? Thromb. Res. 2020, 188, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Soff, G.A.; Mones, J.; Wilkins, C.; Devlin, S.; Haegler-Laube, E.; Wills, J.; Sarasohn, D.M.; Juluru, K.; Singer, M.; Miao, Y.; et al. Rivaroxaban treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center institutional experience. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 3, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Agnelli, G.; Becattini, C.; Meyer, G.; Muñoz, A.; Huisman, M.V.; Connors, J.M.; Cohen, A.; Bauersachs, R.; Brenner, B.; Torbicki, A.; et al. Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McBane, R.D.; Wysokinski, W.E.; Le-Rademacher, J.G.; Zemla, T.; Ashrani, A.; Tafur, A.; Perepu, U.; Anderson, D.; Gundabolu, K.; Kuzma, C.; et al. Apixaban and dalteparin in active malignancy-associated venous thromboembolism: The ADAM VTE trial. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khorana, A.A.; Francis, C.W.; Culakova, E.; Kuderer, N.M.; Lyman, G.H. Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 632–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stein, P.D.; Beemath, A.; Meyers, F.A.; Kayali, F.; Skaf, E.; Olson, R.E. Pulmonary embolism as a cause of death in patients who died with cancer. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Curroncol 28 00016 g001 550
Figure 1. (a). Modified Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) protocol for adult Ph+ve acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with age under 60. (b). Modified DFCI protocol for adult Ph+ve ALL patients with age above 60.
Figure 1. (a). Modified Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) protocol for adult Ph+ve acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with age under 60. (b). Modified DFCI protocol for adult Ph+ve ALL patients with age above 60.
Curroncol 28 00016 g001
Curroncol 28 00016 g002 550
Figure 2. Overall temporal distribution of the 30 VTE events from diagnosis to the end of maintenance with respect to the whole cohort of 123 patients. The incidence was 3.25% (4 out of 123) at diagnosis, 8.13% (10 out of 123) during induction, 8.94% (11 out of 123) during intensification, and 4.07% (5 out of 123) during maintenance.
Figure 2. Overall temporal distribution of the 30 VTE events from diagnosis to the end of maintenance with respect to the whole cohort of 123 patients. The incidence was 3.25% (4 out of 123) at diagnosis, 8.13% (10 out of 123) during induction, 8.94% (11 out of 123) during intensification, and 4.07% (5 out of 123) during maintenance.
Curroncol 28 00016 g002
Curroncol 28 00016 g003 550
Figure 3. VTE site distribution throughout treatment phase. Dx = diagnosis; IND = induction; INT = intensification; Maint = maintenance.
Figure 3. VTE site distribution throughout treatment phase. Dx = diagnosis; IND = induction; INT = intensification; Maint = maintenance.
Curroncol 28 00016 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics.
VariablesWhole Cohort (n = 123) Mean (Range)Patients Who Developed VTE (n = 30) Mean (Range)Patients Who Did Not Develop VTE (n = 95) Mean (Range)p Value
Age at diagnosis (range)49.9 (17.4–80.9)55.2 (24.2–80.9)48.2 (17.4–80.0)0.01
Sex, female (%)56 (45.5%)16 (53.3%)40 (43.0%)0.32
Weight in kg (range)74.7 (41.7–127)73.1 (41.7–110.8)74.7 (47.0–127.0)0.48
BMI in kg/m2 (range)26.1 (18.9–52.2)26.3 (18.9–38.3)26.4 (17.7–52.2)0.56
WBC in bil/L (range)45.6 (0–460)41.9 (1.4–413) 46.8 (0–460)0.84
Blast in % (range)72.8 (0–98)74.9 (0–98)72.1 (0.8–97)0.80
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Table 2. Characteristics of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).
VariablesSub-CategoriesPatients with VTE n = 30 n (%)
Timing of VTEAt diagnosis4 (13.3)
Induction10 (33.3)
Intensification11 (36.7)
Maintenance5 (16.7)
Location of VTEDVT 10 (33.3)
PE6 (20.0)
Cardiac2 (6.7)
PICC/CVC-related12 (40.0)
plt < 50 bil/LAmong 10 VTE pts during induction 9 (9 in 10, 90.0%)
Among 11 VTE pts during intensification 2 (2 in 11, 18.2%)
Padua score (mean, range) 5.4, 3–10
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, R.; Liu, X.; Law, A.D.; Kanfar, S.; Maze, D.; Chan, S.M.; Gupta, V.; Yee, K.W.; Minden, M.D.; Schimmer, A.D.; et al. Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010016

AMA Style

Chen R, Liu X, Law AD, Kanfar S, Maze D, Chan SM, Gupta V, Yee KW, Minden MD, Schimmer AD, et al. Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen. Current Oncology. 2021; 28(1):128-137. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ruiqi, Xing Liu, Arjun D. Law, Solaf Kanfar, Dawn Maze, Steven M. Chan, Vikas Gupta, Karen W. Yee, Mark D. Minden, Aaron D. Schimmer, and et al. 2021. "Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen" Current Oncology 28, no. 1: 128-137. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010016

APA Style

Chen, R., Liu, X., Law, A. D., Kanfar, S., Maze, D., Chan, S. M., Gupta, V., Yee, K. W., Minden, M. D., Schimmer, A. D., Schuh, A. C., McNamara, C. J., Murphy, T., Xu, A., Falcone, U., Seki, J., & Sibai, H. (2021). Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen. Current Oncology, 28(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop