Next Article in Journal
Has Screening Mammography Become Obsolete?
Previous Article in Journal
Wait Times for Prostate Cancer Treatment and Patient Perceptions of Care in Canada: A Mixed-Methods Report
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Mammography Debate, Round Two: Science, Smoke and Mirrors

No Surrender Breast Cancer Foundation, Locust Valley, NY, USA
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(5), 325-327; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2890
Submission received: 7 July 2015 / Revised: 5 August 2015 / Accepted: 11 September 2015 / Published: 1 October 2015

Excerpt

Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

Regrettably, some aspects of the breast cancer screening debate display their own uniquely obfuscating argumentation, more smoke and mirrors than scientific clarity. [...]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaniklidis, C. The Mammography Debate, Round Two: Science, Smoke and Mirrors. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 325-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2890

AMA Style

Kaniklidis C. The Mammography Debate, Round Two: Science, Smoke and Mirrors. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(5):325-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaniklidis, C. 2015. "The Mammography Debate, Round Two: Science, Smoke and Mirrors" Current Oncology 22, no. 5: 325-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2890

APA Style

Kaniklidis, C. (2015). The Mammography Debate, Round Two: Science, Smoke and Mirrors. Current Oncology, 22(5), 325-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2890

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop