Switching from Femoral to Radial Access for Coronary Angiography in ACS
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Statistics
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Limitations
Disclosures
References
- Campeau, L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989, 16, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiemeneij, F.; Laarman, G.J. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993, 30, 173–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- [Agostoni, P.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.G.; de Benedictis, M.L.; Rigattieri, S.; Turri, M.; Anselmi, M.; et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004, 44, 349–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jolly, S.S.; Amlani, S.; Hamon, M.; Yusuf, S.; Mehta, S.R. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009, 157, 132–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jolly, S.S.; Yusuf, S.; Cairns, J.; Niemelä, K.; Xavier, D.; Widimsky, P.; et al. For the RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23, 377, 1409–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romagnoli, E.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.; Sciahbasi, A.; Politi, L.; Rigattieri, S.; Pendenza, G.; et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in STElevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18, 60, 2481–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012, 33, 2569–619. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013, 8, 1242–51.
- Mehran, R.; Rao, S.V.; Bhatt, D.L.; Gibson, C.M.; Caixeta, A.; Eikelboom, J.; et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011, 123, 2736–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Stone, G.W.; McLaurin, B.T.; Cox, D.A.; Bertrand, M.E.; Lincoff, A.M.; Moses, J.W.; et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. (ACUITY trial). N Engl J Med. 2006, 355, 2203–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hess, C.N.; Peterson, E.D.; Neely, M.L.; Dai, D.; Hillegass, W.B.; Krucoff, M.W.; et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2014 Jun 3, 129, 2277–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Radial (n = 285) | Femoral (n = 504) | p-value | |
Age | 62.2 ± 13.5 | 64.9 ± 12.6 | <0.01 |
Gender (male; %) | 74.4 | 77.2 | NS |
STEMI (%) | 44.6 | 59.7 | <0.01 |
Diabetes mellitus (%) | 16.5 | 14.9 | NS |
Hypertension (%) | 51.6 | 52.6 | NS |
Smoking (%) | 34.4 | 31.1 | NS |
Creatinine (μmol/l) | 79.1 ± 23.5 | 86.4 ± 56.3 | NS |
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 27.2 ± 4.4 | 27.0 ± 9.3 | NS |
Previous stroke (%) | 4.6 | 3.8 | NS |
Previous myocardial infarction (%) | 15.4 | 19.0 | NS |
Previous CABG (%) | 1.8 | 4.4 | 0.05 |
Previous PCI (%) | 14.7 | 17.5 | NS |
PVD (%) | 2.5 | 5.4 | 0.05 |
OAC (%) | 2.8 | 3.2 | NS |
Radial (n = 285) | Femoral (n = 504) | p-value | |
Total fluoroscopy time (min) | 11.2 ± 6.1 | 12.1 ± 8.8 | NS |
Total contrast used (ml) | 238 ± 75 | 241 ± 84 | NS |
Door-to-balloon time (STEMI patients only) | 111.5 ± 123.0 | 104.0 ± 90.4 | NS |
Number of guides used | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | NS |
Total stent length (mm) | 28 ± 17 | 31 ± 20 | 0.06 |
Access site crossover | 8.1% | 0% | <0.01 |
X-vessel disease | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 0.01 |
Gp IIb/IIIa use (%) | 14.4 | 33.9 | <0.01 |
Radial (n = 285) | Femoral (n = 504) | p-value | |
Any bleeding (%) | 5.3 | 14.1 | <0.01 |
Access site bleeding (%) | 3.9 | 10.5 | 0.01 |
Any bleeding without Gp IIb/IIIa use (%) | 4.1 | 8.7 | 0.03 |
Access site bleeding without Gp IIb/IIIa use (%) | 2.9 | 6.0 | 0.07 |
Bleeding according to BARC criteria (%) | |||
BARC 2 | 4.2 | 9.9 | |
BARC 3a | 0 | 1.2 | <0.01 |
BARC 3b | 1.1 | 2.6 | |
BARC 5 | 0 | 0.4 |
95% confidence interval* | p-value | |
Gender (male) | –0.58 to –0.05 | 0.02 |
(Lower) age | –0.04 to –0.005 | 0.02 |
Access route for coronary angiography (femoral) | 0.04 to 0.66 | 0.03 |
Diabetes | –0.70 to 0.08 | NS |
Renal failure | –0.20 to 0.46 | NS |
Gp IIb/IIIa use | 0.37 to 0.87 | <0.001 |
© 2015 by the author. Attribution - Non-Commercial - NoDerivatives 4.0.
Share and Cite
Reho, I.; Sprenger, M.; Tueller, D.; Bottignole, B.; Kurz, D.J.; Bernheim, A.; Eberli, F.R.; Zbinden, R. Switching from Femoral to Radial Access for Coronary Angiography in ACS. Cardiovasc. Med. 2015, 18, 169. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2015.00332
Reho I, Sprenger M, Tueller D, Bottignole B, Kurz DJ, Bernheim A, Eberli FR, Zbinden R. Switching from Femoral to Radial Access for Coronary Angiography in ACS. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2015; 18(5):169. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2015.00332
Chicago/Turabian StyleReho, Ivano, Martin Sprenger, David Tueller, Britta Bottignole, David J. Kurz, Alain Bernheim, Franz Robert Eberli, and Rainer Zbinden. 2015. "Switching from Femoral to Radial Access for Coronary Angiography in ACS" Cardiovascular Medicine 18, no. 5: 169. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2015.00332
APA StyleReho, I., Sprenger, M., Tueller, D., Bottignole, B., Kurz, D. J., Bernheim, A., Eberli, F. R., & Zbinden, R. (2015). Switching from Femoral to Radial Access for Coronary Angiography in ACS. Cardiovascular Medicine, 18(5), 169. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2015.00332