Next Article in Journal
Environmental Injustice and Electronic Waste in Ghana: Challenges and Recommendations
Next Article in Special Issue
Examining Teacher Concerns and Anxiety on the Implementation of a Universal Body Image Program
Previous Article in Journal
Anxiety and Worry about Six Categories of Climate Change Impacts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internalized Weight Stigma and Weight Discrimination: Associations with Quality of Life and Psychosocial Impairment in a Sample Living with Food Insecurity
 
 
Brief Report
Peer-Review Record

Digital Mental Health Interventions: Differences in Diet Culture Intervention Framing

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010024
by Hannah F. Fitterman-Harris 1,*, Gabrielle G. Davis 2, Samantha P. Bedard 1,3, Claire E. Cusack 1 and Cheri A. Levinson 1,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010024
Submission received: 10 November 2023 / Revised: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 20 December 2023 / Published: 23 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Associations between Eating Disorders and Psychological Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Good morning.

I would like to congratulate the authors for their efforts in their work. They present interesting data. However, I consider that for the improvement of the final paper and its acceptance, a number of changes should be made.

Firstly, the type of manuscript is Brief Report and appears as Article. I believe that the paper provides information that could be expanded to be a full article. But that is the decision of the authors and the editor.

The main improvements should be made in the Materials and Methods section. The text in the proposed order complicates the comprehension and follow-up of the article, as in order to understand some of the data it is necessary to move forward or backward in the pages. The order should be:

Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

2.2. Measures

2.3. Procedures

2.4. Data Analyses (remove from results section)

Table 1 should only contain the Participant Demographic Information, while the descriptions of the questionnaires should appear under Results. Therefore, I recommend splitting the table into two parts.

The discussion should be expanded, as it is somewhat limited. The results should be interpreted in relation to other studies that have looked at the same variables or related topics.

The important limitations of the study should also be pointed out, not just the strengths.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop