Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Mothers’ Perceived Unsupportive Intergenerational Co-Parenting on Children’s Social Competence: Evidence from China
Next Article in Special Issue
Inorganic Contaminants in Plant-Based Yogurts Commercialized in Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
A Bibliometric Study on the Social Validity of Telepractice in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Processed Food: Nutrition, Safety, and Public Health
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph20010424
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Reformulation of Top-Selling Processed and Ultra-Processed Foods and Beverages in the Peruvian Food Supply after Front-of-Package Warning Label Policy

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010424
by Lorena Saavedra-Garcia 1,2, Mayra Meza-Hernández 1, Francisco Diez-Canseco 1 and Lindsey Smith Taillie 2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Igor Dias
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010424
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processed Food: Nutrition, Safety and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

Please revise the manuscript accordingly.

Thanks,

Reviewer.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We wish to express our gratitude to the reviewer for  their time invested in reading our manuscript and their enriching comments which will result in an improved version of the manuscript.

Please find attached our point-by-point response to all the comments provided. All changes have been included in the manuscript using track changes.

The authors

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

GENERAL COMMENTS

Dear authors,

Congratulations on your manuscript.

The manuscript well written, easy to follow, and looks sound.

I have some minor questions.

Kind Regards

Reviewer

SPECIFIC COMMENTS

 Lines 18 and 87: In line 18 4 months are mentioned, but in line 87 3 months?

Line 96: What were the criteria used to classify the supermarkets in the three socioeconomic sectors? It would be important to clarify this point.

 

Author Response

We wish to express our gratitude to the reviewer for their time invested in reading our manuscript and thankful for their enriching comments which will result in an improved version of the manuscript.

Please find attached our point-by-point response to all the comments provided. All changes have been included in the manuscript using track changes.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

Please consider revising accordingly.

 

Reviewer.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We appreciate the feedback provided by the reviewer and we are grateful for the opportunity to submit a revised version of our manuscript.

Below you will find a point-by-point response to each comment.

- 

1. Consider changing to (i.e., sugar.....)

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We have modified as suggested. 

2. Change 6 to six.

Response: We have corrected the number.

3. Remove additional space(s). 

Response: We have rectified this. 

4. Consider rephrasing lines 374-376. 

Response Thanks for your suggestion. We have now clarified the statement.

Back to TopTop