Next Article in Journal
Corticospinal Responses Following Gait-Specific Training in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Smoking Has No Influence on Outcomes after Repair of the Medial Meniscus in the Hypo and Avascular Zones—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Incidence Rates of Agricultural Machine-Related Injuries in South Korea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192315589
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Tibial Spine Height Measured by Radiograph Is a Risk Factor for Non-Contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Males: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15589; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315589
by Shixin Nie 1,2, Jiaxing Chen 1,2, Hua Zhang 1,2, Pei Zhao 1,2 and Wei Huang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Deryk G. Jones
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15589; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315589
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity, Diagnostics and Treatment in Knee Injury)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

There are a few grammatical errors. Please check this. Statement that males have higher exertion level than female seems incorrect and offensive. There are similar exertion levels but as you demonstrated in your study there are anatomic differences between males and females. I would remove this statement. At the beginning of the discussion it is stated that the differences in LTSH is the most significant finding but I would submit the that the OR for ACL rupture as demonstrated by the LTSH/TSW % is the most significant finding. The study is sound and the findings are significant and warrant further study particularly in relation to ACL reconstruction techniques and risk of failure of ACLr. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors perform a simple job.  They first compare data obtained by two orthopedic surgeons. Then they compare two groups of people to see differences between them.

The authors are aware of the limitations of their work and show this in the discussion. Despite this, the methodology is correct and the interpretation of the results as well.

In the method section, a subsection indicating the design of the study and/or the experimental protocol is missing.  Before the radiographic technique. It is confused.

Line 62. I don't see the description of the acronym MRI.

I don't understand the usefulness of work for injury prevention.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop