Adaptation and Validation of the Eudaimonic Well-Being Questionnaire to the Spanish Sport Context
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Method
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measurements
2.3. Procedure
3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.2. Invariance Analysis by Gender
4.3. Descriptive Statistics, Reliability and Temporal Stability Analysis
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Sense of Meaning and Purpose
- Contribution and Social Competence
- Personal Development and Self-Acceptance
- Autonomy
- Personal Expressiveness
- Sense of Belonging
References
- Macdougall, H.; O’Halloran, P.; Shields, N.; Sherry, E. Comparing the well-being of para and Olympic sport athletes: A systematic review. Adapt. Phys. Act. Q. 2015, 32, 256–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Do Kim, Y.; Lee, H.W. It is time to consider athletes’ well-being and performance satisfaction: The roles of authentic leadership and psychological capital. Sport Manag. Rev. 2020, 23, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, W.H.; Chang, J.H.; Chen, L.H. mindfulness enhances change in athletes’ well-being: The mediating role of basic psychological needs fulfillment. Mindfulness 2018, 9, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouali, D.; Hall, C.; Pope, P. Measuring eudaimonic wellbeing in sport: Validation of the Eudaimonic Wellbeing in Sport Scale. Int. J. Wellbeing 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, D. Improving well-being through hedonic, eudaimonic, and social needs fulfillment in sport media consumption. Sport Manag. Rev. 2017, 20, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jongbloed, J. Higher education for happiness? Investigating the impact of education on the hedonic and eudaimonic well-being of Europeans. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 2018, 17, 733–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can. Psychol. Psychol. Can. 2008, 49, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Waterman, A.S. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 64, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waterman, A.S. Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. J. Posit. Psychol. 2008, 3, 234–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryff, C.D. Eudaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions. Int. Rev. Econ. 2017, 64, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheldon, K.M.; Corcoran, M.; Prentice, M. Pursuing eudaimonic functioning versus pursuing hedonic well-being: The first goal succeeds in its aim, whereas the second does not. J. Happiness Stud. 2019, 20, 919–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waterman, A.S.; Schwartz, S.J.; Zamboanga, B.L.; Ravert, R.D.; Williams, M.K.; Bede Agocha, V.; Yeong Kim, S.; Brent Donnellan, M. The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J. Posit. Psychol. 2010, 5, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerson, J.; Plagnol, A.C.; Corr, P.J. Subjective well-being and social media use: Do personality traits moderate the impact of social comparison on Facebook? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 63, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schwartz, S.J.; Waterman, A.S.; Vazsonyi, A.T.; Zamboanga, B.L.; Whitbourne, S.K.; Weisskirch, R.S.; Vernon, M.; Caraway, S.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Forthun, L.F.; et al. The association of well-being with health risk behaviors in college-attending young adults. Appl. Dev. Sci. 2011, 15, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unanue, W.; Dittmar, H.; Vignoles, V.L.; Vansteenkiste, M. Materialism and Well–Being in the UK and Chile: Basic Need Satisfaction and Basic Need Frustration as Underlying Psychological Processes. Eur. J. Personal. 2014, 28, 569–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huta, V. Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. J. Happiness Stud. 2012, 13, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schutte, L.; Wissing, M.P.; Khumalo, I.P. Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB). Psychol. Well Being 2013, 3, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salavera, C.; Usán, P. Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario QEWB de bienestar eudaimónico en adolescentes. Educ. Psychol. 2019, 25, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lynn, M.R. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 1986, 35, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, H.W.; Hocevar, D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Marsh, H.W. The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. Am. Educ. Res. J. 1993, 30, 841–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, H.W. Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. J. Educ. Psychol. 1991, 83, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, L.J.; Kowalski, K.C.; Mack, D.E.; Sabiston, C.M. Exploring self-compassion and eudaimonic well-being in young women athletes. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2014, 36, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferguson, L.J.; Kowalski, K.C.; Mack, D.E.; Sabiston, C.M. Self-compassion and eudaimonic well-being during emotionally difficult times in sport. J. Happiness Stud. 2015, 16, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behzadnia, B.; Ryan, R.M. Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations in physical education and their relations with motivation and wellness. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2018, 49, 363–385. [Google Scholar]
Type Analysis | Adjustment Index |
---|---|
RMSEA | Equal or less than 0.06 |
SRMSR | Equal or less than 0.08 |
IFI | +0.95 |
TLI | +0.95 |
CFI | +0.95 |
χ2/degree freedom | Between 2 and 3 |
Models | χ2 | df | χ2/df | IFI | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMSR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
One-factor Model | 649,10 | 189 | 3.43 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.53 |
3-factor Model | 1269,26 | 186 | 6.82 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
4-factor Model | 1058,53 | 183 | 5.78 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
6-factor Model | 431,52 | 174 | 2.48 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.51 |
Six-Factor Model | ||||||||||
Models | χ2 | df | χ2/df | Δχ2 | Δdf | CFI | TLI | IFI | RMSEA | SRMSR |
1 | 882.07 | 348 | 2.53 | - | - | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.051 | 0.045 |
2 | 963.68 | 363 | 2.65 | 24.03 | 15 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.055 | 0.051 |
3 | 1106.65 | 405 | 2.73 | 160.16 ** | 57 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.061 | 0.055 |
4 | 1188.31 | 426 | 2.79 | 289.48 ** | 78 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.067 | 0.060 |
Higher Order Model | ||||||||||
Models | χ2 | df | χ2/df | Δχ2 | Δdf | CFI | TLI | IFI | RMSEA | SRMSR |
1 | 945.43 | 366 | 2.58 | - | - | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.052 | 0.046 |
2 | 1009.19 | 381 | 2.65 | 41.56 | 15 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.055 | 0.048 |
3 | 1079.20 | 402 | 2.68 | 97.76 | 36 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.060 | 0.050 |
4 | 1139.76 | 408 | 2.80 | 135.76 ** | 41 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.066 | 0.052 |
5 | 1187.66 | 414 | 2.87 | 142.47 ** | 48 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.071 | 0.056 |
6 | 1300.54 | 435 | 2.99 | 193.55 ** | 69 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.075 | 0.060 |
Factors | M | SD | α | AVE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ICC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Sense of Meaning and Purpose | 3.23 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.66 | - | 0.38 ** | 0.59 *** | 0.39 *** | 0.58 ** | 0.55 ** | 0.88 (CI = 0.85–0.91) |
2. Contribution and Social Competence | 3.25 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 0.63 | - | 0.61 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.49 ** | 0.28 ** | 0.83 (CI = 0.80–0.88) | |
3. Personal Development and Self-Acceptance | 3.56 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.60 | - | 0.47 ** | 0.68 ** | 0.51 ** | 0.81 (CI = 0.80–0.85) | ||
4. Autonomy | 3.78 | 1.02 | 0.84 | 0.62 | - | 0.27 ** | 0.30 ** | 0.85 (CI = 0.82–0.89) | |||
5. Personal Expressiveness | 3.33 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 0.65 | - | 0.58 ** | 0.88 (CI = 0.83–0.92) | ||||
6. Sense of Belonging | 3.29 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.66 | - | 0.84 (CI = 0.82–0.87) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Trigueros, R.; Pérez-Jiménez, J.M.; García-Mas, A.; Aguilar-Parra, J.M.; Fernandez-Batanero, J.M.; Luque de la Rosa, A.; Manzano-León, A.; Navarro, N. Adaptation and Validation of the Eudaimonic Well-Being Questionnaire to the Spanish Sport Context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073609
Trigueros R, Pérez-Jiménez JM, García-Mas A, Aguilar-Parra JM, Fernandez-Batanero JM, Luque de la Rosa A, Manzano-León A, Navarro N. Adaptation and Validation of the Eudaimonic Well-Being Questionnaire to the Spanish Sport Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(7):3609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073609
Chicago/Turabian StyleTrigueros, Rubén, José M. Pérez-Jiménez, Alejandro García-Mas, José M. Aguilar-Parra, José M. Fernandez-Batanero, Antonio Luque de la Rosa, Ana Manzano-León, and Noelia Navarro. 2021. "Adaptation and Validation of the Eudaimonic Well-Being Questionnaire to the Spanish Sport Context" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 7: 3609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073609