Conduct Disorder in Immigrant Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden
1
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, SE-221 00 Malmö, Sweden
2
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
3
Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
4
Center for Community-Based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), Department of Functional Pathology, School of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 10643; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010643
Submission received: 11 July 2021
/
Revised: 26 September 2021
/
Accepted: 6 October 2021
/
Published: 11 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Real World Data for Population-Based Pediatric Studies)
Abstract
:Introduction. Conduct disorder is a psychiatric diagnosis characterized by repetitive and persistent norm-breaking behavior. This study aimed to compare the risk of conduct disorder between first- and second-generation immigrant children and adolescents and their native controls. Methods. In this nationwide, open-cohort study from Sweden, participants were born 1987–2010, aged 4–16 years at baseline, and were living in the country for at least one year during the follow-up period between 2001 and 2015. The sample included 1,902,526 and 805,450 children-adolescents with native and immigrant backgrounds, respectively. Data on the conduct disorder diagnoses were retrieved through the National Patient Register. We estimated the incidence of conduct disorder and calculated adjusted Hazard Ratios. Results. Overall, the adjusted risk of conduct disorder was lower among first-generation immigrants and most second-generation immigrant groups compared with natives (both males and females). However, second-generation immigrants with a Swedish-born mother and a foreign-born father had a higher risk of conduct disorder than natives. Similar results were found for sub-diagnoses of conduct disorder. Conclusions. The higher risk of conduct disorder among second-generation immigrants with a Swedish-born mother and the lower risk among most of the other immigrant groups warrants special attention and an investigation of potential underlying mechanisms.
Keywords:
adolescents; children; conduct disorder; cohort; real-world data; register-based research; immigrants; Sweden1. Introduction
According to United Nation (UN) estimates from the last decade, an increasing number of people have left their home countries to seek a safer and better life elsewhere [1]. War, conflict, and political and economic instability have jointly driven the current immigration crisis. As a result, many countries worldwide may receive even more immigrants in the coming years.
Immigrants experience substantial stress before, during, and after immigration. Upon arriving in the host country, issues like struggles with adapting to a new culture and securing jobs and housing can affect immigrants’ own as well as their children’s mental health [2]. Missing their country of origin and the loved ones left behind may additionally pose a high psychological burden on immigrants. Immigrant children and adolescents might have a higher risk of mental health issues because of their dependence on parents and impartial coping mechanisms. However, despite the importance of examining immigrant mental health, high-quality studies in this area are limited, and previous research on young immigrants’ mental health have shown inconsistent results. In a survey from The Netherlands, first- and second-generation Moroccan adolescents had lower self-reported externalizing behavior problems compared with their native peers [3]. However, an increasing trend of both internalizing and externalizing disorders over time was observed among immigrants, suggesting their diminishing mental health over time. A European study reported lower rates of externalizing disorders among 14–15-year-old immigrants compared with natives [4] and studies from the USA and Canada have shown a lower prevalence of externalizing problem behaviors among immigrants compared with natives [5]. Recent systematic reviews have reported that most studies on immigrant mental health had suboptimal designs such as low sample sizes and problems with bias [6,7,8].
Conduct disorder is a psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents that is characterized by repetitive and persistent norm-breaking behavior and violation of other people’s rights [9]. Affecting approximately 2% of children and adolescents globally [10], the disorder is responsible for 1% of the total years lived with disability [11]. Some data suggest an increasing trend of conduct disorder and other externalizing disorders over recent years [12,13]. A mix of genetic, family-related, environmental factors, and their interplay might explain the development of conduct disorder [9,14,15]. In addition, adolescents with conduct problems are more likely to commit crimes, get sexually abused, or use drugs [16,17], which may further deteriorate their mental health. Poor educational attainment and career failure may negatively affect the health-related quality of life of these individuals in adulthood [18,19]. Despite the negative effects of conduct disorder, little is known about the incidence across settings and subpopulations [9], and more knowledge of this disorder is particularly important in immigrants as the many negative effects of this disorder could hinder integration in the new society. It is also possible that the psychosocial stress related to migration may influence children’s and adolescents’ mental health. However, data from children and adolescents with an immigrant background is particularly limited [20,21,22]. This is partly due to limited availability of nationwide datasets that contain relevant determinants of health-related outcomes.
Sweden has received many refugees and non-refugee immigrants over the past few decades. By 2018, approximately one-third of the Swedish population were first- or second-generation immigrants [23]. In the 5–24 year age group, approximately 26% are first- or second-generation immigrants [24]. Sweden has also excellent register resources with national coverage. These registers have individual-level longitudinal data on various social, welfare, and health outcomes, which make them suitable for studies on immigrants’ mental health. In our recent studies, we have shown that the incidence of depression [25] and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD) [26] varies across immigrant groups and in comparison with the native population in Sweden. However, longitudinal studies on conduct disorders in immigrants are still limited worldwide. This study therefore aimed to examine the incidence of conduct disorder in first- and second-generation immigrant children and adolescents compared with natives in Sweden, taking socioeconomic factors into account. Identifying subpopulations at higher risks of conduct disorder is a crucial step in planning and delivering prevention and treatment interventions.
2. Materials and Methods
This was a population-based retrospective open cohort study. Pseudonymized data from several nationwide registers were provided to us by Statistics Sweden (SCB) [20] and The National Board of Health and Welfare (In Swedish: Socialstyrelsen) [27] for this study. A unique serial number was used to link data across registers at the individual level. All study procedures complied with the ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki [28]. This study was part of a larger project that received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden (Ethics approval No: 2012/795). The latest amendment was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority 12 March 2019 (Dnr: 2019-01588)”.
2.1. Participants and Observation
Eligible participants were born 1987–2010, and were registered as residents of Sweden during at least one year during the study period between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2015. The enrollment included individuals aged 4–16 years at baseline, which could occur between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2013. In total 2,707,976 children-adolescents were included in the study population that consisted of 1,902,526 (70.3%) natives (defined as Swedish-born with both parents born in Sweden), 228,889 (8.4%) first-generation immigrants (defined as born abroad with both parents born abroad), 160,839 (5.9%) second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father (and a native mother), 133,217 (4.9%) second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born mother (and a native father), and 282,505 (10.4%) second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents. All second-generation immigrant groups were defined as born in Sweden.
The follow-up continued until participants turned 18 years, emigrated, died, or at the end of the study on 31 December 2015, whichever came first. Approximately 90% of the participants from each of the native/immigrant groups were followed until the end of the study or the age of 18 years. In total, we accrued a total of 20,181,775 person-years of observations from participants including the following: natives (14,741,074 person-years), first-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents (1,139,125), second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents (2,103,371), second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born mother (991,173), and second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father (1,207,032).
2.2. Registers and Data
We used the following nationwide registers: The Register of the Total Population (RTB), the Multi-Generation Register, the Medical Birth Register, the Cause of Death register, the Migration Register, the Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (LISA), and The National Patient Register (NPR). Data on conduct disorder diagnoses were obtained from the National Patient Register (NPR). The NPR had full national coverage for inpatient and outpatient hospitalization records during the entire study period and has been validated for research purposes [29].
2.3. Maternal Income
We used maternal income as a surrogate of socioeconomic status. We obtained data on maternal income from the LISA database at Statistics Sweden. Statistics Sweden calculates disposable income based on total income from all potential sources, including wages, welfare benefits, other social subsidies, and pensions. We obtained annual disposable income for all females 18–65 years living in Sweden during the observation period. To account for inflation, we categorized income into quintiles relative to all other females assigned a disposable income in that year. We then created year-specific income quintiles and used the maternal income quintile for the year of start of follow-up for each participant. Few individuals lacked information on income in the total study population. As a higher proportion of foreign-born parents lacked information on income, we did not impute missing data on income since we judged that this information was not missing at random between subgroups. However, we included those with missing income values in the lowest income quintile.
2.4. Conduct Disorder Diagnosis
In the NPR all psychiatric diagnoses for the study period were registered using the 10th version of the International Classification of Disease (ICD 10) [30]. We searched for outpatient or inpatient hospital diagnoses with the three-digit code F91 to identify participants with a conduct disorder diagnosis. We also extracted data on specific subtypes of conduct disorder using the following four-digit ICD codes: confined to family context (F91.0), CD with aggression and lack of social adjustment (F91.1), CD with aggression but normal social adjustment (F91.2), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) (F91.3) and other and unspecified (F91.8, F91.9).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
We estimated non-adjusted incidence rates of conduct disorder per 100,000 person-years and report 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the estimates. Using Cox regression, we ran sex-specific models and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of conduct disorder with 95% CI for the immigrant groups compared with natives in two steps. In Model 1, we controlled for birth year and age at the start of the follow up. In Model 2, we additionally controlled for maternal income. Maternal income (see below) could not be attained for some participants including some of those from the first-generation immigrant group (n = 23,392; 10.2%); a majority of these did not have their biological mother in Sweden (n = 16,955; 7.4%). We assigned the lowest maternal income value (first income quintile) to those with a missing maternal income. We evaluated the proportional hazards assumptions for the Cox regression models using log-log survival plots and did not find any meaningful deviations from the assumption indicating that there was no effect modification from time in the models. We used Stata (version 15.1) for data management and statistical analysis [31].
3. Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study participants aged 4–16 years at baseline; i.e., natives, first-generation immigrants, and second-generation immigrants, the latter further divided into the three subgroups described above. Approximately one-quarter of natives (27.4%) compared with approximately three-quarters of the first-generation immigrants (77.3%) belonged to the lowest maternal income quintile. Among the second-generation immigrants, the lowest proportion of individuals in the lowest maternal income quintile was among those with a foreign-born mother and Swedish-born father (31.7%) and the highest proportion of individuals in the lowest maternal income quintile was among those with both parents born abroad (64.8%). In total, 9088 individuals, including 6440 natives, 454 first-generation immigrants, 780 s-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents, 473 s-generation immigrants with a foreign-born mother, and 941 s-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father, had a registered conduct disorder diagnosis in the NPR.
Table 2 shows that there were more male than female participants with a conduct disorder diagnosis (any subtype). Around two thirds (6203) were male. Table 2 also shows the non-adjusted incidence rates of conduct disorder among male and female study participants in the different groups. The incidence rates of conduct disorder ranged from 51.0 to 104.6 among males and 23.8 to 51.5 among females. In both males and females, the highest and lowest incidence rates of conduct disorder were found among the second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and the second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents, respectively. Across native and immigrant subgroups, the incidence rate of conduct disorder was approximately twice as high in males compared with females.
Table 3 shows the HRs of conduct disorder among the male and female immigrant groups compared with natives. In both males and females, first-generation immigrants and second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents had significantly lower hazards of conduct disorder compared with natives in both Model 1 (adjusted for birth year and age at baseline) and Model 2 (also adjusted for maternal income). In second-generation immigrants with only one foreign-born parent a different pattern emerged. Males and females with a foreign-born father and Swedish-born mother had the highest hazards of conduct disorder. Their significant HRs in Model 1 were 1.79 and 1.82, respectively. In Model 2, these risks only decreased slightly to 1.71 and 1.73, respectively, and remained significant. Males with a foreign-born mother and a Swedish-born father had a slightly but statistically non-significant higher risk of conduct disorder compared with natives; in Model 2, the HR was 1.04 (95% CI = 0.93, 1.16). The corresponding HR for females was 1.18 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.39).
In supplementary analyses of sub diagnoses, most of the cases were found to belong to ODD and other and unspecified conduct disorders in both males and females (Appendix Table A1). With few exceptions, most results for the sub diagnoses were consistent with the overall results. Both male and female second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother had higher HRs of all subtypes of conduct disorder and almost all of these were statistically significant (Table A2 and Table A3).
4. Discussion
Using nationwide registers, we conducted a longitudinal study to compare the incidence of conduct disorder between first- and second-generation immigrant children and adolescents and their native controls in Sweden. Our results indicated a markedly higher risk of conduct disorder among male and female second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother whereas males and females with a foreign-born mother and a Swedish-born father had slightly higher risks that where non-significant among the males. In contrast, in both males and females, first-generation immigrants and second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents had a lower risk of conduct disorder.
Our study indicated that a potential mental health advantage in first-generation immigrants seems to partly decrease in the second-generation immigrant children and adolescents. Our results are somewhat but not entirely in line with findings from studies across Europe and the USA as few studies have focused on conduct disorder, which belongs to the category externalizing disorders where ADHD also is included [3,4,5]. A recent systematic review of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in child and adolescent refugees and asylum seekers only found two studies for the conduct disorder subtype ODD with an estimated average prevalence of 1.69% (95% CI: 0.78, 4.16) for the condition in this group [8]. Our finding on markedly higher risks of conduct disorder in male and female second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother was in line with results from a study from Finland. The Finnish study found higher odds of externalizing disorders among offspring of foreign-born fathers [32]. However, the Finnish study also found higher odds of ADHD in the offspring of two foreign-born parents, which is in contrast with our results focusing on conduct disorders.
We are unaware of previous studies focusing on subtypes of conduct disorders, possibly due to small sample sizes. Although most of our findings for the subtypes were consistent with the overall results, these results are unique and could be helpful in future studies on potential mechanisms behind our findings.
Besides genetic factors, a set of prenatal (e.g., maternal stress, smoking, and drug use), perinatal (e.g., parental psychopathology and malnutrition), familial (e.g., maladaptive and harsh parenting), and neighborhood risk factors (e.g., deviant peers and poverty) may contribute to the risk of developing conduct disorder [9]. Despite its high burden, even in high-income countries such as the UK and the USA, research on conduct disorder has received substantially less funding compared with many other psychiatric diseases [9]. Our knowledge about causal pathways and the weight of various risk factors in the development of conduct disorder is therefore still at very early stages. This study did, however, not intend to examine the causal effects of immigration on risk of conduct disorder although we attempt to discuss potential explanations behind our findings.
Among all immigrant groups, only those second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother had markedly higher risks of conduct disorder compared with natives while first-generation immigrant children and adolescents as well as second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents had lower risks. All residents in Sweden are entitled to free healthcare until they turn 18 years old. Moreover, schools are actively engaged in maintaining the mental health of their students, but the use of these services may be hampered because some immigrant populations have different patterns of using healthcare services for their children’s psychiatric problems [33,34]. Poor health literacy, cultural barriers, and stigma related to psychiatric disorders are more common among immigrant parents than natives and especially in those with a low socioeconomic status [35,36]. On the other hand, because conduct disorder involves the violation of other peoples’ rights, lower service utilization may play a less important role in its diagnosis compared with other psychiatric disorders. Raising awareness on early symptoms of conduct disorder among parents, guardians, and teachers can help to ensure early diagnosis and start of psychosocial support among affected children and adolescents.
Most known non-genetic risk factors of conduct disorder are caused or associated with parental stress and conflict in the family. Marriage or partnership between a native and an immigrant person may result more frequently in divorce or break-up due to cultural differences and conflicts in parenting [37]. A study from Finland reported higher divorce rates among native women with a foreign-born partner compared with those with a native partner, which seemed to be explained by unemployment and economic issues in male immigrants [38]. This may partly explain our findings of a higher risk among second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother. In addition, cultural differences and conflicts in parenting may also affect these children’s mental health. More data collection is needed, however, to investigate the potential roles of parenting style differences and parental relationships on the mental health of immigrant offspring in Sweden.
The context of the host country and cultural stress may also play major roles in the integration of immigrants and in maintaining their mental health. In a study from the USA, bicultural stress was associated with changes in aggressive and rule-breaking behavior among newly arrived immigrant Hispanic high school adolescents [39]. This population group is also more likely to experience economic difficulties. Immigrants in Sweden have better living conditions compared with those in the UK, Germany, and The Netherlands, as previously reported in a European study [4]. Sweden provides unique social welfare services including unemployment benefits, paid parental leave, monthly child allowance, and free healthcare until the age of 18 to its residents. These services can minimize the impact of economic challenges on lower SES immigrant families. However, poorer social networks and poorer access or utilization of available health care resources may partially explain the lower risks in some vulnerable immigrant groups; if these persons don’t seek medical attention, they won’t be diagnosed. Future research should use other study designs in order to examine whether our findings are true, such as surveys and interviews of parents, teachers and school children. If differences between native and immigrant children/adolescents do exist, the next step would be to examine possible mechanisms behind these potential differences.
Limitations and Strengths
The results of this study must be interpreted in the light of some limitations. We identified participants with a conduct disorder diagnosis through their inpatient and outpatient hospital referrals in the patient register. While trained doctors with psychiatric expertise have made most of these diagnoses, some inconsistencies in diagnostic procedures over time and across hospitals could not be ruled out. Besides, cultural differences between natives and some immigrants may affect immigrant children’s likelihood of obtaining a conduct disorder diagnosis. Although we accounted for several potential confounders, our analysis did not include all potential confounders (e.g., parental marital status). Future research should attempt to account for residual confounding in their analyses. Despite these limitations, however, this study is the first national cohort study comparing the burden of conduct disorder between immigrant children-adolescents and natives using high quality data. For example, we had no loss to follow up as each person could be tracked for emigration or death because of the unique identification number assigned to each person with a residence permit in Sweden.
5. Conclusions
Our results indicated that first-generation immigrants and second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents had a lower risk of conduct disorder. In contrast, a markedly higher risk of conduct disorder among male and female second-generation immigrants with a foreign-born father and a Swedish-born mother was found. Future studies should investigate the underlying mechanisms behind these findings including potential inequities in the access to or the utilization of mental health services across natives and different immigrant groups.
Author Contributions
M.O., J.S. and K.S. designed the study. M.O. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. H.O., J.S. and K.S. contributed to the statistical analysis and the interpretation of the results. All authors contributed to finalizing the manuscript and read and approved the final version of the paper before the submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Sundquist J. has received funding to conduct this study from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No: 787592). The European Research Council as the sole funder of this study had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The European Research Council as the sole funder of this study had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was part of a larger project that received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden (Ethics approval No: 2012/795. The latest amendment was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority 12 March 2019 (No: 2019-01588. The aims in this study are also covered by Ethics approval No: 2008/409, 2010/476).
Informed Consent Statement
We have used pseudonymized register-based data for this study. According to the Swedish law, register-based studies do not need consent from participants.
Data Availability Statement
According to the Swedish law, national register data cannot be shared, but it is possible to apply for their use from the authorities.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A
Table A1.
Non-adjusted incidence rates of subtypes of conduct disorder per 100,000 participants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
Table A1.
Non-adjusted incidence rates of subtypes of conduct disorder per 100,000 participants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
| CD, Confined to Family Context (F91.0) | CD with Aggression and Lack of Social Adjsutment (F91.1) | CD with Aggression but Normal Social Adjustment (F91.2) | Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) (F91.3) | CD, Other & Unspecified (F91.8, F91.9) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male IR (95% CI) | Female IR (95% CI) | Male IR (95% CI) | Female IR (95% CI) | Male IR (95% CI) | Female IR (95% CI) | Male IR (95% CI) | Female IR (95% CI) | Male IR (95% CI) | Female IR (95% CI) | |
| Natives | 3.7 (3.3, 4.2) | 3.2 (2.8, 3.7) | 4.8 (4.3, 5.3) | 2.3 (1.9, 2.6) | 1.6 (1.4, 1.9) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) | 25.4 (24.3, 26.6) | 10.0 (9.3, 10.8) | 28.5 (27.3, 29.7) | 14.8 (13.9, 15.7) |
| First-generation | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 1.7 (0.9, 3.2) | 1.9 (1.0, 3.5) | 7.9 (5.9, 10.5) | 1.9 (1.0, 3.5) | 0.5 (0.2, 1.6) | 0.7 (0.3, 2.0) | 17.5 (14.4, 21.3) | 5.5 (3.8, 7.9) | 33.6 (29.2, 38.7) | 16.4 (13.3, 20.3) |
| Second-generation | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 2.7 (1.9, 3.9) | 2.1 (1.4, 3.2) | 4.5 (3.4, 6.0) | 2.2 (1.4, 3.3) | 1.3 (0.8, 2.2) | 0.9 (0.5, 1.7) | 20.3 (17.7, 23.2) | 7.3 (5.8, 9.2) | 26.9 (23.9, 30.2) | 13.2 (11.1, 15.6) |
| Foreign-born mother a | 3.0 (1.8, 4.9) | 3.1 (1.9, 5.2) | 5.9 (4.1, 8.5) | 1.7 (0.8, 3.4) | 2.4 (1.3, 4.2) | 1.3 (0.6, 2.8) | 24.1 (20.2, 28.8) | 11.5 (8.9, 15.0) | 32.3 (27.7, 37.6) | 18.9 (15.4, 23.2) |
| Foreign-born father a | 6.2 (4.5, 8.5) | 5.4 (3.9, 7.7) | 8.8 (6.7, 11.5) | 4.9 (3.4, 7.1) | 3.1 (2.0, 4.9) | 1.4 (0.7, 2.7) | 47.5 (42.4, 53.3) | 19.4 (16.2, 23.3) | 51.9 (46.5, 58.0) | 25.6 (21.8, 30.0) |
| Total population | 3.6 (3.3, 4.0) | 3.2 (2.8, 3.5) | 5.2 (4.8, 5.7) | 2.4 (2.1, 2.7) | 1.7 (1.4, 1.9) | 0.9 (0.8, 1.2) | 25.7 (24.7, 26.7) | 10.1 (9.5, 10.8) | 30.2 (29.1, 31.2) | 15.5 (14.8, 16.3) |
(Conduct Disorder: CD; Incidence Rate: IR; Confidence Interval: CI; Each participant could have more than one diagnosis). a Other parent was Swedish-born.
Table A2.
Hazard Ratios of subtypes of conduct disorder in male participants with an immigrant background and 4–16 years at baseline compared with natives in Sweden, 2001–2015.
Table A2.
Hazard Ratios of subtypes of conduct disorder in male participants with an immigrant background and 4–16 years at baseline compared with natives in Sweden, 2001–2015.
| CD, Confined to Family Context (ICD 10 Code: F91.0) | CD with Aggression and Lack of Social Adjustment (ICD 10 Code: F91.1) | CD with Aggression But Normal Social Adjustment (ICD 10 Code: F91.2) | Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ICD 10 Code: F91.3) | CD, Other & UNSPECIFIED (ICD 10 Code: F91.8, F91.9) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | |
| Natives | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| First-generation immigrants | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.36 (0.18, 0.71) | 0.28 (0.14, 0.56) | 1.33 (0.94, 1.89) | 0.93 (0.65, 1.34) | 0.33 (0.10, 1.07) | 0.28 (0.08, 0.92) | 0.61 (0.49, 0.76) | 0.47 (0.38, 0.59) | 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) | 0.82 (0.69, 0.97) |
| Second-generation immigrants | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.73 (0.50, 1.08) | 0.62 (0.42, 0.92) | 0.99 (0.73, 1.33) | 0.76 (0.56, 1.04) | 0.82 (0.47, 1.43) | 0.72 (0.41, 1.28) | 0.75 (0.65, 0.87) | 0.63 (0.55, 0.73) | 0.92 (0.82, 1.05) | 0.80 (0.71, 0.91) |
| Foreign-born mother a | 0.80 (0.48, 1.34) | 0.79 (0.47, 1.32) | 1.27 (0.87, 1.84) | 1.24 (0.86, 1.80) | 1.49 (0.82, 2.69) | 1.49 (0.82, 2.69) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.90 (0.75, 1.09) | 1.12 (0.96, 1.32) | 1.11 (0.95, 1.31) |
| Foreign-born father a | 1.66 (1.19, 2.35) | 1.59 (1.13, 2.23) | 1.86 (1.40, 2.48) | 1.72 (1.29, 2.29) | 1.93 (1.19, 3.14) | 1.85 (1.14, 3.01) | 1.84 (1.63, 2.09) | 1.75 (1.55, 1.98) | 1.82 (1.62, 2.05) | 1.75 (1.55, 1.96) |
(Conduct Disorder (CD); International Classification of Disease: ICD; Confidence Interval: CI; Hazard Ratio: HR; In model 1, we adjusted for birth year and age at baseline. In model 2, we additionally adjusted for maternal income. The HRs lower and greater than 1.0—with 95% CIs which did not include 1.0—were marked with underlined and bold texts, respectively.). a Other parent was Swedish-born.
Table A3.
Hazard Ratios of subtypes of conduct disorder in female participants with an immigrant background and 4–16 years at baseline compared with natives in Sweden, 2001–2015.
Table A3.
Hazard Ratios of subtypes of conduct disorder in female participants with an immigrant background and 4–16 years at baseline compared with natives in Sweden, 2001–2015.
| CD, Confined to Family Context (ICD 10 Code: F91.0) | CD with Aggression and Lack of Social Adjustment (ICD 10 Code: F91.1) | CD with Aggression But Normal Social Adjustment (ICD 10 Code: F91.2) | Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ICD 10 Code: F91.3) | CD, Other & Unspecified (ICD 10 Code: F91.8, F91.9) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | |
| Natives | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| First-generation immigrants | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.50 (0.26, 0.98) | 0.39 (0.20, 0.78) | 0.70 (0.35, 1.40) | 0.51 (0.25, 1.04) | 0.54 (0.17, 1.69) | 0,43 (0.13, 1.38) | 0.49 (0.33, 0.73) | 0.40 (0.27, 0.60) | 0.86 (0.67, 1.10) | 0.68 (0.53, 0.88) |
| Second-generation immigrants | ||||||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.66 (0.42, 1.04) | 0.56 (0.35, 0.88) | 1.05 (0.67, 1.65) | 0.84 (0.53, 1.33) | 0.99 (0.49, 1.98) | 0.83 (0.41, 1.70) | 0.71 (0.56, 0.90) | 0.61 (0.48, 0.78) | 0.94 (0.79, 1.13) | 0.80 (0.67, 0.97) |
| Foreign-born mother a | 1.00 (0.59, 1.68) | 0.98 (0.58, 1.66) | 0.78 (0.38, 1.59) | 0.76 (0.37, 1.55) | 1.39 (0.60, 3.20) | 1.38 (0.60, 3.18) | 1.14 (0.87, 1.50) | 1.13 (0.86, 1.49) | 1.33 (1.07, 1.64) | 1.31 (1.06, 1.63) |
| Foreign-born father a | 1.71 (1.18, 2.48) | 1.62 (1.12, 2.35) | 2.25 (1.52, 3.35) | 2.10 (1.41, 3.13) | 1.50 (0.72, 3.12) | 1.41 (0.68, 2.95) | 1.94 (1.59, 2.36) | 1.85 (1.52, 2.25) | 1.77 (1.49, 2.10) | 1.68 (1.42, 2.00) |
(Conduct Disorder (CD); International Classification of Disease: ICD; Confidence Interval: CI; Hazard Ratio: HR; In model 1, we adjusted for birth year and age at baseline. In model 2, we also adjusted for maternal income. The HRs lower and greater than 1.0—with 95% CIs which did not include 1.0—were marked with underlined and bold texts, respectively.). a Other parent was Swedish-born.
References
- International Migrants Numbered 272 Million in 2019, Continuing an Upward Trend in All Major World Regions: Population Facts; Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD: New York, NY, USA, 2019.
- Salami, B.; Yaskina, M.; Hegadoren, K.; Diaz, E.; Meherali, S.; Rammohan, A.; Ben-Shlomo, Y. Migration and social determinants of mental health: Results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can. J. Public Health 2017, 108, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paalman, C.; Van Domburgh, L.; Stevens, G.; Vermeiren, R.; Van De Ven, P.; Branje, S.; Frijns, T.; Meeus, W.; Koot, H.; Van Lier, P.; et al. Internalizing and externalizing problems in immigrant boys and girls. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2014, 39, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mood, C.; Jonsson, J.O.; Låftman, S.B. Immigrant Integration and Youth Mental Health in Four European Countries. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2016, 32, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhadj Kouider, E.; Koglin, U.; Petermann, F. Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Migrant Children and Adolescents in American Countries: A Systematic Review. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2015, 17, 1240–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bas-Sarmiento, P.; Saucedo-Moreno, M.J.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; Méndez, M.P. Mental Health in Immigrants Versus Native Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2017, 31, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kien, C.; Sommer, I.; Faustmann, A.; Gibson, L.; Schneider, M.; Krczal, E.; Jank, R.; Klerings, I.; Szelag, M.; Kerschner, B.; et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in young refugees and asylum seekers in European Countries: A systematic review. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2019, 28, 1295–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blackmore, R.; Gray, K.M.; Boyle, J.A.; Fazel, M.; Ranasinha, S.; Fitzgerald, G.; Misso, M.; Gibson-Helm, M. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: The Prevalence of Mental Illness in Child and Adolescent Refugees and Asylum Seekers. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2020, 59, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fairchild, G.; Hawes, D.J.; Frick, P.J.; Copeland, W.E.; Odgers, C.L.; Franke, B. Conduct disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polanczyk, G.V.; Salum, G.A.; Sugaya, L.S.; Caye, A.; Rohde, L.A. Annual Research Review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2015, 56, 345–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erskine, H.E.; Ferrari, A.; Polanczyk, G.V.; Moffitt, T.; Murray, C.J.L.; Vos, T.; Whiteford, H.; Scott, J. The global burden of conduct disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 2010. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2014, 55, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collishaw, S.; Maughan, B.; Goodman, R.; Pickles, A. Time trends in adolescent mental health. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2004, 45, 1350–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raman, S.R.; Man, K.K.C.; Bahmanyar, S.; Berard, A.; Bilder, S.; Boukhris, T.; Bushnell, G.; Crystal, S.; Furu, K.; KaoYang, Y.-H.; et al. Trends in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use: A retrospective observational study using population-based databases. Lancet Psychiatry 2018, 5, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Disney, E.R.; Iacono, W.; McGue, M.; Tully, E.; Legrand, L. Strengthening the Case: Prenatal Alcohol Exposure Is Associated With Increased Risk for Conduct Disorder. Pediatrics 2008, 122, e1225–e1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shaw, D.S.; Shelleby, E.C. Early-Starting Conduct Problems: Intersection of Conduct Problems and Poverty. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2014, 10, 503–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lopez, B.; Schwartz, S.J.; Prado, G.; Huang, S.; Rothe, E.M.; Wang, W.; Pantin, H. Correlates of Early Alcohol and Drug Use in Hispanic Adolescents: Examining the Role of ADHD with Comorbid Conduct Disorder, Family, School, and Peers. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2008, 37, 820–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Maniglio, R. Prevalence of Sexual Abuse Among Children with Conduct Disorder: A Systematic Review. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2014, 17, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fergusson, D.M.; Horwood, L.J. Early conduct problems and later life opportunities. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1998, 39, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szentiványi, D.; Balázs, J. Quality of life in children and adolescents with symptoms or diagnosis of conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder. Ment. Health Prev. 2018, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, T.X. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in 1.5th Generation, 2nd Generation Immigrant Children, and Foreign Adoptees. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2016, 18, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rousseau, C.; Hassan, G.; Measham, T.; Lashley, M. Prevalence and correlates of conduct disorder and problem behavior in Caribbean and Filipino immigrant adolescents. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2008, 17, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maniadaki, K.; Kakouros, E. Social and mental health profiles of young male offenders in detention in Greece. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 2008, 18, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SCB. Statistics Sweden (SCB). Available online: https://www.scb.se/en/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- Statistics Sweden (SCB). Number of Persons with Foreign or Swedish Background (Rough Division) by Region, Age and Sex. Year 2002–2018: (SCB) Statistikservice, Statistics Sweden. Available online: http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101Q/UtlSvBakgGrov/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- Osooli, M.; Ohlsson, H.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K. Major depressive disorders in young immigrants: A cohort study from primary healthcare settings in Sweden. Scand. J. Public Health 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osooli, M.; Ohlsson, H.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in first- and second-generation immigrant children and adolescents: A nationwide cohort study in Sweden. J. Psychosom. Res. 2021, 141, 110330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Socialstyrelsen. The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). Available online: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/en/about-us/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- World Medical, A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar]
- Ludvigsson, J.; Andersson, E.; Ekbom, A.; Feychting, M.; Kim, J.-L.; Reuterwall, C.; Heurgren, M.; Olausson, P.O. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth Revision, 2nd ed. Available online: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/F90-F98 (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Release, 15th ed.; StataCorp LLC.: College Station, TX, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Lehti, V.; Chudal, R.; Suominen, A.; Gissler, M.; Sourander, A. Association between immigrant background and ADHD: A nationwide population-based case-control study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2016, 57, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scheppers, E.F.; Van Dongen, E.; Dekker, J.; Geertzen, J. Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: A review. Fam. Pr. 2006, 23, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latzman, R.D.; Malikina, M.V.; Hecht, L.K.; Lilienfeld, S.O.; Chan, W.Y. The Contribution of Personality and Refugee Camp Experience to Callous and Unemotional Traits Among Immigrant Adolescents in the United States: Implications for the DSM-5 “Limited Prosocial Emotions” Specifier. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2015, 47, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bauldry, S.; Szaflarski, M. Immigrant-based Disparities in Mental Health Care Utilization. Socius Sociol. Res. A Dyn. World 2017, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Augsberger, A.; Yeung, A.; Dougher, M.; Hahm, H.C. Factors influencing the underutilization of mental health services among Asian American women with a history of depression and suicide. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dribe, M.; Lundh, C. Intermarriage, Value Context and Union Dissolution: Sweden 1990. Eur. J. Popul. Rev. Eur. De Démographie 2011, 28, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lainiala, L.; Säävälä, M. Intercultural marriages and consideration of divorce in Finland: Do value differences matter? Popul. Res. Inst. 2013, 10, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Forster, M.; Grigsby, T.; Soto, D.W.; Schwartz, S.J.; Unger, J. The Role of Bicultural Stress and Perceived Context of Reception in the Expression of Aggression and Rule Breaking Behaviors Among Recent-Immigrant Hispanic Youth. J. Interpers. Violence 2015, 30, 1807–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Characteristics of participants with a native or immigrant background in Sweden, born 1987–2010.
Table 1.
Characteristics of participants with a native or immigrant background in Sweden, born 1987–2010.
| Natives | First-Generation Immigrants | Second-Generation Immigrants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish-Born Parents | Two Foreign-Born Parents | Two Foreign-Born Parents | Foreign-Born Mother a | Foreign-Born Father a | |
| Included participants, n (%) | |||||
| Male | 977,897 (51.4) | 120,231 (52.5) | 144,826 (51.3) | 68,608 (51.5) | 82,177 (51.1) |
| Female | 924,629 (48.6) | 108,658 (47.5) | 137,679 (48.7) | 64,609 (48.5) | 78,662 (48.9) |
| Total | 1,902,526 | 228,889 | 282,505 | 133,217 | 160,839 |
| Age at baseline, n (%) | |||||
| 4–6 | 1,166,131 (61.3) | 66,952 (29.2) | 208,306 (73.7) | 89,110 (66.9) | 104,670 (65.1) |
| 7–11 | 468,002 (24.6) | 80,345 (35.1) | 52,060 (18.4) | 28,389 (21.3) | 36,354 (22.6) |
| 12–16 | 268,393 (14.1) | 81,592 (35.7) | 22,139 (7.8) | 15,718 (11.8) | 19,815 (12.3) |
| Maternal income at baseline | |||||
| Quintile 1 (lowest income) | 521,609 (27.4) | 176,965 (77.3) | 183,036 (64.8) | 42,221 (31.7) | 59,820 (37.2) |
| Quintile 2 | 613,257 (32.2) | 15,827 (6.9) | 55,987 (19.8) | 37,742 (28.3) | 46,679 (29.0) |
| Quintile 3 | 366,150 (19.2) | 5907 (2.6) | 23,624 (8.4) | 24,245 (18.2) | 27,783 (17.3) |
| Quintile 4 | 233,580 (12.3) | 3275 (1.4) | 11,136 (3.9) | 15,975 (12.0) | 15,472 (9.6) |
| Quintile 5 (highest income) | 163,105 (8.6) | 3523 (1.5) | 5330 (1.9) | 11,974 (9.0) | 10,109 (6.3) |
| Missing income | 4825 (0.2) | 23,392 (10.2) | 3392 (1.2) | 1060 (0.8) | 976 (0.6) |
| Had a conduct disorder diagnosis n (%) | 6440 (0.4) | 454 (0.2) | 780 (0.3) | 473 (0.4) | 941 (0.6) |
a Other parent was Swedish-born.
Table 2.
Incidence rates of Conduct Disorder (per 100,000 person-years) among participants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
Table 2.
Incidence rates of Conduct Disorder (per 100,000 person-years) among participants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
| Male | Female | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person-Years at Risk | Number of Cases | IR (95% CI) | Person-Years at Risk | Number of Cases | IR (95% CI) | |
| Natives | 7,554,503 | 4386 | 58.1 (56.4, 59.8) | 7,150,583 | 2054 | 28.7 (27.5, 30.0) |
| First-generation immigrants | ||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 570,751 | 325 | 56.9 (51.1, 63.5) | 529,726 | 129 | 24.3 (20.5, 28.9) |
| Second-generation immigrants | ||||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 1,059,598 | 540 | 51.0 (46.8, 55.4) | 1,009,784 | 240 | 23.8 (20.9, 27.0) |
| Foreign-born mother a | 504,614 | 313 | 62.0 (55.5, 69.3) | 476,362 | 160 | 33.6 (28.8, 39.2) |
| Foreign-born father a | 610,961 | 639 | 104.6 (96.8, 113.0) | 586,214 | 302 | 51.5 (46.0, 57.7) |
| Total population | 10,300,427 | 6203 | 60.2 (58.7, 61.7) | 9,752,969 | 2885 | 29.6 (28.5, 30.7) |
Conduct Disorder ICD 10 code: F91; Incidence Rate: IR; Confidence Interval: CI. a Other parent is Swedish-born.
Table 3.
Hazard ratios of Conduct Disorder among immigrants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
Table 3.
Hazard ratios of Conduct Disorder among immigrants 4–16 years at baseline in Sweden, 2001–2015.
| Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | Model 1 HR (95% CI) | Model 2 HR (95% CI) | |
| Natives | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| First-generation | ||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.81 (0.72, 0.92) | 0.64 (0.57, 0.73) | 0.66 (0.54, 0.81) | 0.53 (0.43, 0.65) |
| Second-generation | ||||
| Two foreign-born parents | 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) | 0.72 (0.66, 0.79) | 0.85 (0.74, 0.97) | 0.72 (0.63, 0.83) |
| Foreign-born mother a | 1.05 (0.94, 1.18) | 1.04 (0.93, 1.16) | 1.19 (1.01, 1.40) | 1.18 (1.00, 1.39) |
| Foreign-born father a | 1.79 (1.65, 1.95) | 1.71 (1.57, 1.85) | 1.82 (1.61, 2.05) | 1.73 (1.53, 1.95) |
Conduct Disorder ICD 10 code: F91; Hazard ratio: HR; Confidence Interval: CI. Model 1 is adjusted for birth year and age at baseline. Model 2 is also adjusted for maternal income.). a Other parent is Swedish-born.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Osooli, M.; Ohlsson, H.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K. Conduct Disorder in Immigrant Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010643
AMA Style
Osooli M, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Conduct Disorder in Immigrant Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(20):10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010643
Chicago/Turabian StyleOsooli, Mehdi, Henrik Ohlsson, Jan Sundquist, and Kristina Sundquist. 2021. "Conduct Disorder in Immigrant Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010643
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
